Multivariable Calculus | Stoke's Theorem

We give a description of Stoke's Theorem as well as a sketch of the proof.
Please Subscribe: www.youtube.co...
Personal Website: www.michael-pen...
Randolph College Math: www.randolphcol...
Research Gate profile: www.researchga...
Google Scholar profile: scholar.google...

[@willyh.r.1216]

Stoke's Theorem proof revisited. Most of Multi-variable Calc. students should enjoy this video. Thank you Michael Penn.

[@oqardZ]

6:37: should be Qx - Py instead of Qy - Px

[@ehess1492]

When the circle showed up on the integral sign - this is the defining point where I stopped caring about math during my engineering degree and just mailed it in for a 50. 😄

[@MichaelPennMath]

Thats funny, I got more psyched when "fancy" notation starting showing up in problems!

[@MrCentrax]

You're the best math channel. Love your vector Calculus videos

[@MCdouchbag]

Very good videos, despite me not understanding everything!

[@MrRenanwill]

Hahaha Not sure how you know Bolsonaro, but your name is quite interesting. I would suggest to you take Jerry out of the name to make It a better joke for brazilians. Hahaha

[@MCdouchbag]

@@MrRenanwill I'm Portuguese so I'm acquainted with the man. I went with Jerry because it just sounds funny.

[@KaliFissure]

Nice, clear, concise 👍
Surface(cos(u/2)cos(v/2),cos(u/2)sin(v/2),sin(u)/2),u,0,2pi,v,0,4pi
Single sided or not? The missing Klein?

[@tomkerruish2982]

Now do the full Stokes' Theorem, with manifolds and the exterior derivative and all that jazz.

[@theelephant4680]

loving the lack of numbers😍😍

[@nellvincervantes6233]

If you Physics, can you answer this pls?
A horizontal shaft rotates in bearings at its ends. At its midpoint is keyed a disk weighing 40lbs, whose center of gravity is 0.1 inch from the axis of rotation. If a static force of 200 lbs deflects the shaft and disk through 0.1 inch, determine the critical speed of rotation of the shaft.

[@tighemcasey7589]

what are inches and pounds?

[@johnsonoyero2855]

Good stuff

[@yeahyeah54]

14:25, dx is missing, by the way i love this videos

[@kingmunch7252]

So what must we do to proof the general case?

[@sarpozturk6511]

I'm on a plain, I can't complain

[@danielvolinski8319]

The last 10 seconds of this video are really fishy: how did dA, a scalar, gets transformed into dS, a vector? Thanks!

[@aswinibanerjee6261]

Hey the equation on the thumbnail is probably wrong

[@MichaelPennMath]

fixed!

[@CDChester]

#GUCCI

[@willyh.r.1216]

Stoke's Theorem proof revisited. Most of Multi-variable Calc. students should enjoy this video. Thank you Michael Penn.