US government report ‘putting to bed’ Chris Bowen’s nuclear arguments
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- Sky News host Peta Credlin says a “bombshell report” released by the United States government has “put to bed” so many of Energy Minister Chris Bowen’s arguments regarding nuclear.
Ms Credlin said it also put to rest some of the CSIRO’s arguments surrounding nuclear as well.
She was joined by Sky News contributor Chris Uhlmann to discuss the US report challenging Mr Bowen’s agenda.
Surprise surprise surprise
Bowen is proved WRONG !!!
We all knew this
NOW HERES PROOF !!!
Just look at Asia, Europe they all nuclear and increasing nuclear
Clearly, you appear to be regurgitating BS. Nuclear is only expanding in China. On a global scale, nuclear is shrinking.
Per 𝘞𝘕𝘐𝘚𝘙2024, Key Insights on page 19:
"""
𝙉𝙚𝙩 𝘿𝙚𝙘𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙉𝙪𝙘𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝘾𝙖𝙥𝙖𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙮 - 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙄𝙣𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙨 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙍𝙚𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝘽𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙬 2021
ɚ 𝘐𝘯 2023, 5 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 (5 𝘎𝘞) 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘶𝘱 𝘢𝘯𝘥 5 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 (6 𝘎𝘞), 𝘵𝘩𝘶𝘴 𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘣𝘺 1 𝘎𝘞 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺.
ɚ 𝘎𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 2.2 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘸 2021 𝘢𝘯𝘥 2019.
ɚ 𝘕𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘺’𝘴 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 9.2 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 9.1 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘬 𝘰𝘧 17.5 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘯 1996.
ɚ 𝘈𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘪𝘥-2024, 408 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 367 𝘎𝘞 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥, 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘢 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘳, 30 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2002-𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘬-34 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘨-𝘛𝘦𝘳𝘮 𝘖𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘦.
ɚ 𝘉𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 2004-2023, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 102 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 104 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥𝘸𝘪𝘥𝘦: 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 49 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢; 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢, 𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 51 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘴.
"""
And on page 20:
"""
𝙎𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙒𝙞𝙣𝙙 𝘼𝙙𝙙 𝙃𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙂𝙞𝙜𝙖𝙬𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙨, 𝙉𝙪𝙘𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙎𝙝𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙠𝙨
𝘐𝘯 2023, 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘩𝘺𝘥𝘳𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥 𝘜𝘚$623 𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯, 27 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴. 𝘚𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘸 𝘣𝘺 73 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 51 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘺, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 460 𝘎𝘞 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘶𝘴 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 1 𝘎𝘞 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘎𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 50 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴.
𝘾𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙖 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 200 𝘎𝘞 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 1 𝘎𝘞 𝘰𝘧 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳; 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 578 𝘛𝘞𝘩 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘺 40 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘈𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘩𝘺𝘥𝘳𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘣𝘪𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘴, 𝘯𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘱𝘶𝘵.
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙀𝙪𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘥 44 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 40 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦. 𝘚𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 721 𝘛𝘞𝘩, 𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 588 𝘛𝘞𝘩. 𝘈𝘭𝘴𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘩𝘺𝘥𝘳𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘭 𝘧𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘭 𝘨𝘢𝘴. 𝘍𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘭 𝘧𝘶𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥 19 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳.
"""
Bowen fails once again...
It’s called hating Australia by certain politicians.
Some politicians have shares in the renewable companies - no wonder they don't want to change when it affects their hip pocket !!!!!!!!!! Stuff the good of Australia !!!!!!!!!!!!
Albo & Bobo...got it so wrongo!! Ffs the subs ok but wrong for pwr ...😂
Nuclear moving forward immediately. It's so obvious. I am just a normal technical Engineering kinda guy of 62 years. I am increasingly alarmed about the naivety of our elected representatives. Start building yesterday, be the best at it.
Albo hates NOOKLYAR
Nookylar
Noook-leear 😂😂😂😂
Will Bowen call usa liars???
or, will bobblehead buffoon Bowen accuse the U S of A of "misinformation" or "disinformation"???😮😂😂😂
So when does the upper echelon of the Australian labor party/ vicpoll get jailed for treason???????
Right after you do.
@@justlikeredwine well done cupcake 🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@justlikeredwine how’s life eating your mums stinky cont everyday??????
@@richardwilcox5988 typical response from a weak snowflake
@@richardwilcox5988 some people will never learn, it's better to keep their mouth closed and be thought a fool, than to open it and REMOVE all doubt!!!
Bowen has not a clue.
Chris Ulhman makes perfect sense always. I have read his work for a long time, and he has never been afraid to say it like it is!
Scrap the idea of sharing renewables with Nuclear, just go Nuclear full stop! No more destructive fans and mirrors!!
Can we stop calling them renewables too, they are intermittents needing regular replacement.
Exactly and at a NEVERENDING, FOREVER cost!!
@@SueNicholls-95 Ruinables?
Unreliables?
Snake mouth and WANKENEASY 😎😎🤣🤣🤣🤣
Don't forget carpet muncher Benny Wong and Dim Jim Snake Chalmer.😂😅
Dim Jim and Ping pong Wong 😂
Thats going to hurt labor, show who has investments un green energy, look at all the tax money lining there pockets
*their. You definitely aren't up to discussing nuclear when you can't even speak English
@@justlikeredwine
I smell a Spelling Nazi Labor Voting Greenie.
Farkwit 👈
I am not surprised at all that this has happened simply because Labor keeps talking about stopping climate change while Europe, the UK, Canada and the US are talking about lowering CO2 emissions.
The difference in communication is obvious because by pushing the emergency, end of the world climate change alarmism, it gives Labor the implicit authority to play roughshod over voters by expedient implementation of its ideology without having to give any regard to democratic processes. In other words, it is a licence to rule by decree under the pretence that we are in a climate emergency rather than adopt the more rational and more difficult narrative of the need to reduce CO2 emissions.
A movie coming out about Al Gore & his lies
Thank you Chris.
About time we had some information about what other countries are doing for their people. Thanks Peta.
🇦🇺
Instead of going in one ear and out the other like most things, maybe this report will stick in Bowen's brain?
The report is flawed. You don't understand the first thing about nuclear
@@justlikeredwine explain???
@@justlikeredwine Actually I know more than most about nuclear and a lot more than lamb brain Chris Bowen.
What brain?????
@@ThatGuy-ze5kk I don't have the time or the crayons to explain it to you in the manner to which you are accustomed
But it’s all about the clown shoes according to Bowen
PAKISTAN, 6 YEARS TO BUILD, ACP1000, 1100MWe.... HUALONG ONE PWR POWER PLANT...60 YEAR LIFE.... $2.7 BILLION USD ACCORDING TO BLOOMBERG.... PAKISTAN IS RANKED 88 IN ADVANCED COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD, 250 MILLION PEOPLE.... AUSTRALIA IS RANKED 20 WITH 26 MILLION... AND WE CAN'T BUILD NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS... AUSTRALIA ????
In just a few years the average Australian family will be paying $8,000+ annually for expensive unreliable renewable electricity.
This anti nuclear hysteria will be short lived as nuclear is the only viable option, if you want affordable, reliable power without the emissions.
Labor of course didn't do its sums properly yet again !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And nuclear without renewables? Whats that cost? Kess again ill bet
Bowen down to anybody !
nuclear power is incredibly underrated!
Wait, what. Are you suggesting our paid public servants Albo, Bowen and the CSIRO would dare to lie to the Australian public?!?
Would they get prosecuted if the Lord forbid the misinfo bill becomes a thing? Oh wait.
Coal $10 per MwH
Casanova Bowen! Everything he touches......he f#@ks! Great words by Ray Hadley 😂
Just wait for the day when Albogreasy says to Dimwit Bowen ......... "I've decided we're going to go Nuclear as part of the mix, oh and can you go out to the press room and let everyone know please"
It’s a shame the average person is so bad at dealing with big numbers. Community wide infrastructure is expensive if you look at it as a single number but let’s say the total cost is $100B that’s only $3333 per person assuming our population hits 30m by the time it’s built. That’s not substantially different to the cost of delivery of new services to a new house or installing solar panels etc and inline with projects like the NBN. It’s certainly a better spend than the $15b Victoria is currently spending for a 9km railway from one side of the city to the other that most Victorians will be lucky to use more than twice a year. If we want cheaper and reliable electricity that doesn’t involve a huge environmental impact to install it, as well as an energy source with enough guts to power the industries we need to make things and therefore keep jobs here and charge our future EV fleet, nuclear is the only choice. Even at 20 years it will still be faster than other energy sources and it could be quicker if we actually just got started instead of spending years talking about it. The idea that it’s ok for somewhere like Iran to use Australian uranium to power their country but not ok for us to do so because it’s not safe just makes no sense at all
No right channel audio.
Seriously the report is two pages long and concludes with it might reduce electricity prices in conjunction with renewables. Chris tell us how much Vogtle 3 & 4 cost and how long they took to construct.
What on earth is the US doing telling Australians what to do.
Ahhh P Credlin, dual accolades - the woman that brought down Prime Minister T Abbott AND Australia's greatest wine mum. . .
How predictable are retarded leftard such as yourself Resort to person attacks because of the actual true facts...
Sun is FREE vs Nuclear is disposal is for eternity!
Thanks to Orano's world-leading industrial-scale technologies, almost 96% of the spent fuel used in nuclear reactors for power generation or research purposes can be recycled.
So much for that Argument.😂
Making solar panels is dirty and disposal of them is even more so. If just buried in the ground, they can poison the soil forever.
Nothing is free Buddy. You still need alot of gear and money to make power out of the sun.
How to tell us you know Jack shit!!! 😂😂
How is credlin still on air? She is a danger to road users.
So what you doing here then. Go back to your Bias Liebor ABC that should suit you
She's only a danger to Labor shills.
If only every voting aged Aussie watch Credlin, the country wouldn't be so screwed up.