@@Uzarran solar power is weak power. You not going to have air-conditioning or a stove or hot water heater or clothes dryer. Especially after the sun goes down and you're using the stored energy.
@@NoRegertsHere Nuclear subs have nuclear weapons... Where are they going to store them? The latest modular nuclear power station, only produce steam as they operate, what is cleaner than that ?
There hoping Klaus Schawb has given them both a Room in the underground city's they won't be getting one Albo failed Klaus with the voice Thomas Mayo is middle eastern he works for Klaus Schawb Albo is being blackmailed
I am not surprised at all that this has happened simply because Labor keeps talking about stopping climate change while Europe, the UK, Canada and the US are talking about lowering CO2 emissions. The difference in communication is obvious because by pushing the emergency, end of the world climate change alarmism, it gives Labor the implicit authority to play roughshod over voters by expedient implementation of its ideology without having to give any regard to democratic processes. In other words, it is a licence to rule by decree under the pretence that we are in a climate emergency rather than adopt the more rational and more difficult narrative of the need to reduce CO2 emissions.
Ok, first off, what climate emergency ? it was called global warming, until it was proven the planet was getting cooler. So they spun a few words and now it is a climate emergency. Can we stop putting labels on everything. The planet has been dieing since the 1980s . There outlandish claims have all come to pass The hole in the ozone layer no longer there. The pacific islands will be wiped out, never happened. Perth was supposed to be a dry dusty bowl by 2000 never happened. It the planet was on only getting hotter debunked. All the artic in the artic was going to melt.. The great Greta Thornburg or who ever that stupid kid was, the Earth was doomed by 2023..
It's not only the government who is anti nuclear, it is also gas and electrical energy companies, who have invested interests in renewables. Plus the fact they receive billions in subsidies from the government/taxpayer.
They're afraid of losing the election and this is just a desperate attempt to gain a few votes. If they were to win, this would disappear within nanoseconds.
it’s great to get some real facts on the cost of nuclear over the period of generation which is 40% cheaper then Bowens madness definitely voting Nuclear ex alp voter
The actual figures are already well known. They very a little because of the older technology in the mix, but typically it is only marginally higher than coal over the full lifespan of the plant. Cost out the same for so called renewable over a 60 to 80 year forward projection and see what costing come up :) (P.S. That is about 4 to 5 near complete replacements of the total renewable generators.)
What a load of crap. Heres a fact. Even if we agreed to have nuclear power we would need to wait 10 years before we could even break ground to build one. Minimum 15 years before even 1 might be ready. So what happens in the next15 years? Any plans until then?
@@polarbear7255 Please do let the grown ups talk. We can use a mix of wind, solar, gas, hydro and geothermal, all relatively cheap options. The nuclear designs that are being proposed don't exist yet, in theory some of them could be quite economical especially the designs from Terra power if they pan out, they are proposing to reduce the regulatory requirements by seperating the nuclear and power generation units which would result in a cheaper more cost effective plant that could be commissioned sooner. But again, the design is just that, a design which is unproven. Coal isn't the answer, it's by far the worst option for us mere mortals, more radioactivity has been released into the environment from coal fired plants then the combined total of that put out by the nuclear industry.
The opposite is happening. IEA data shows that 85% of global power investment is going to new energy technologies and only 1% to nuclear. Recent blowouts in nuclear projects such as Vogtle, Hinkley, Flamanville, Olkiluto and Sumner C have placed a risk premium on capital which makes renewables a much more attractive investment. Last year global nuclear capacity went backwards, with closures exceeding new capacity coming online, yet 510 GW of renewables were added
@TheDesertraptor Not true. David Littleproud confirmed what any thoughtful person already knew - the LNP only plan to provide SOME of Australia's power from nukes, the rest to come from renewables and gas.
Why not the democrats' can not think of anything by themselves.. They want to build a wall now. They are talking about securing the border now that they got 21 million illegals to vote in the upcoming election. give me one thing the democrats have thought up by themselves that was a success ?
OMG if we had Nuclear then fine we could keep maintaining them. Nuclear has an essential role which is 100% correct if you have already built them. The issue is building them from scratch. Anyway its now too late and a waste of time in Australia and NO our model is NOT renewable and storage. It also includes Gas Turbine back up which is what makes Renewables low cost and reliable for a 90%+ Renewable grid. (Just Renewables and Storage is NUTS expensive and NO it is NOT planned here).
Ok, so mine sites use solar panels for power, which are toxic.. They clear the bush then build massive solar farms on native land. What happens when we get storms that damage these farms it will happen, then the toxic chemicals and the rainwater leak back into the ground ?
No bank will finance a new coal plant in Australia due to the risk of it becoming a stranded asset. It is a 20th century technology trying to compete in a 21st century power market. The last coal power plant in the UK, the birthplace of coal power, has just shut down.
@@ShaneMcGrath. High power prices are not the fault of renewables, but our old coal plants that keep breaking down. The Australian Energy Regulator sets the benchmarks for consumer power prices. When they released the benchmarks for 2023/24 they gave the main reason as outages at coal plants over the last 2 years forcing expensive gas to be used to fill the gap. In the winter of 2022, up to 14 out of 47 coal generators were offline at once. Callide C is only just coming online after a catastrophic explosion in May 2021 that caused blackouts in SE Qld and into NSW. It had another unit offline for months due to a cooling tower problem All that is going to cost over $400 million to fix at the latest estimate The AER also said that prices would have been even higher had not increased renewables output filled part of the gap
@@tassied12 How is gas more expensive ? There is like tons of it been drilled off W.A by the biggest companies in the world.. BHP Chevron Santos Woodside. Shell. Etc, oh wait the last labour government signed a deal forgoing taxes on gas to big companies.
@@MrGrim2u1987 There is no gas reservation policy in the Eastern states, so gas plants there pay global prices for gas. WA has a gas reservation policy, established by the Carpenter govt, despite opposition from the Howard govt.
Under the new MaD laws i wont be able to comment about the level of misinformation from the govt on nuclear energy shortly.. Where are we going Australia. Why are these ideas so straight forward except for the people in charge.
So, you're saying that Albo and his cohorts, have been spewing "misinformation/disinformation" to the Australian public on this issue (and others too)? I'd posit that if the Mis/Dis-information was Law, then the Australian public would not have been told about this U.S. report.
$1.5B USD to restore a decomissioned reactor at a functioning plant, so how much is our electricity going to cost with nuclear considering we would be building from scratch. I'm not opposed to nuclear as a green option but lets not kid ourselves, it is going to cost more, pamphlet aside from the lobby.
Nuclear doesn't "compete" with renewables, it makes them utterly pointless. Why bother with costly wind farms and Solar that have a 20 year life span and only provide intermittent power when nukes provide consistent and cheap electricity? Nukes in the USA sell power at about 7 cents/KWH. What were you charged in your last power bill?
Hey... ACMA, the e-Safety Commission's M&D Information Department, and the Australian Taxpayer... 🤥 "Cheapa Ewectwishitty!" 🤥 "My word is my bond." 🤥 "It's all Dutton's fault!" 🤥 "This is another fine mess you've gotten me into, Bowen!" 🤥 "...and FU2 Sleepy Joe! 🤬"
you forgot to mention microsoft reactivating three mile island for their server farms. a private company contracting a power station for its exclusive use is the next step in cheap electricity.
But we are Australians not Americans who really gives a shit what they think or do Israel doesn't. They also have 300 million citizens you can't compare costs from a study done for north america.
If only albo took out the ear plugs and not try and take away our voice most Australians would have told him and saved the nation's embarrassment, Biden is more intelligent then albo
I would say that renewables would complement Nuclear as the reliable baseload power source, not vice versa. Blackouts and $Blowouts are all we can expect from Bowen's and Labor/Greens push for 100% renewables, with more expensive energy bills.
I don’t believe that nuclear is needed at all in Australia we had clean burning coal stations they mothballed with some of the cleanest burning coal in the world .. where is all the spent nuclear fuel going to be dumped ?
What happens to intractable waste in Australia ? Nuclear energy is a one-way street ! Are plenty of kids going to become poorly-paid scientists ? Name one private Australian company which employs scientists. Presumption, denial and speculation are not forms of risk management.
As a miner, hate to say this, 9000 hours of heavy diesel machinery to get your the resource's for your 1 tesla, care to explain how that is green ? How many hours do you think we will need for them giant batteries ? Your green dream renewables is a scam. Plus a couple of side notes, a tesla on fire in California used two fire trucks and 1 million liters of water before the got it out.{ not very green wasting all that water, all those toxic chemicals in the air} Just think about when you have a multi crash on a highway involving burning electric cars. Yes it happens more than our censored media tells us.
@@ThatGuy-ze5kk I've made the same argument about 'renewables'. I understand it applies. To make sensible choices we need people with sense, they're too few and hard to find.
The honest intelligent people already know all of this. Maybe Labor needs to do something about it's internal "misinformation" problem.
How out of touch with reality are labor these days?
Time for Elmer Fudd and Casanova Bowen to pull their heads out of the sand.
Don't you mean their ass.
Our of each others arseholes
AnAL Daisy Chain bum chums Bowne & Albonazi
I'm not sure that it is the sand that their heads are in.
@@sidecarmisanthrope5927 I was trying to be polite.😀
No need for renewables with nuclear.
coal supplied power for decades without help from so called renewables, nuclear can do the same.
Not for large-scale use, at least.
There's till a value to them for individual households as a backup to the main grid.
@@Uzarran solar power is weak power. You not going to have air-conditioning or a stove or hot water heater or clothes dryer. Especially after the sun goes down and you're using the stored energy.
@@StrikeBuster-b2b Nonsense LOL : )
"Slowly, slowly catch a monkey..........."
Wait for the BS from Blackout Bowen
In WA we already have frequent text messages about power outages in some suburbs. The black out is leady here, and we get sillently used to it.
But Albo/ Bowen it's OK for nuclear subs ??? FFS these two have done so much damage to Australia 🇦🇺
💯
Different Power plant. Nuke subs use uranium enriched to weapons grade, never needs to be refuelled for 30-40 years.
@@NoRegertsHere Nuclear subs have nuclear weapons...
Where are they going to store them?
The latest modular nuclear power station, only produce steam as they operate, what is cleaner than that ?
@@MrGrim2u1987 no they don’t have nuclear weapons. They are powered by nuclear reactors
I like to see them suggest a renewables only submarines. Let see how far that goes.
Australia needs its own energy policy. I am sick of lazy politicians following overseas trends.
Because physics is different down here.
Coal and gas fired power we have a bit .
You know why 🤔 Because nuclear power works thats why !
Proven power generation 50 years in service France & Canada
These guys get it...👆👍
Albo should be on hey Hey it's Saturday red faces 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
What's new pissy-cat ?
An early gong from Red and a 0. For sure
He could play Mrs. McGillicuddy, without makeup.
I loved that show as a kid
hasn't the talent for it.
I doubt Bowen,Albo would even listen=both know so much better😂😂
I guess they figure that if they can't be part of the solution, there's money to be made in perpetuating the problem.
Albo and Bowen won’t hear this because they have heir heads in the sand.
I know it's a dark place. But sand? I think not.
So Bowen and wankeasy will be jailed for treason?????
😂😂😂😂😂
There hoping Klaus Schawb has given them both a Room in the underground city's they won't be getting one Albo failed Klaus with the voice Thomas Mayo is middle eastern he works for Klaus Schawb Albo is being blackmailed
@@tomjones5338get off the meth nan
Jailed by their own misinformation bill?
We can only hope...🙏
Stating the bleeding obvious 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
Green / Labor / Teal 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Australia have the rare ability to have nuclear all onshore from mining all the way to permanent disposal
Albi will lose its cash cow in nuclear goes ahead
Union mates heavily invested in wind and solar
Oh, but the CSIRO said Nuclear bad, without interviewing one single expert on the subject.
albo and bowen, the dynamic duo.what a pair of numb sculls.
CAN'T WAIT TO VOTE LABOR OUT
Not a good look Alby. Where he goes, destruction follows. Grimm Reaper😬
But nuclear isn't part of the climate change religion in Australia.
No, because it neatly side steps the planned destruction of Australia. Hence the bitter opposition from the "left"
That Green religion is a Communist suicide program.
Greens nuke opposition = Labor preferences.
Hard to imagine how stupid are Labor politicians.
this government has lost the fucking plot , old Ablo fucking passion fingers fucks everything he touches
I am not surprised at all that this has happened simply because Labor keeps talking about stopping climate change while Europe, the UK, Canada and the US are talking about lowering CO2 emissions.
The difference in communication is obvious because by pushing the emergency, end of the world climate change alarmism, it gives Labor the implicit authority to play roughshod over voters by expedient implementation of its ideology without having to give any regard to democratic processes. In other words, it is a licence to rule by decree under the pretence that we are in a climate emergency rather than adopt the more rational and more difficult narrative of the need to reduce CO2 emissions.
Ok, first off, what climate emergency ?
it was called global warming, until it was proven the planet was getting cooler.
So they spun a few words and now it is a climate emergency.
Can we stop putting labels on everything.
The planet has been dieing since the 1980s .
There outlandish claims have all come to pass
The hole in the ozone layer no longer there.
The pacific islands will be wiped out, never happened.
Perth was supposed to be a dry dusty bowl by 2000 never happened.
It the planet was on only getting hotter debunked.
All the artic in the artic was going to melt..
The great Greta Thornburg or who ever that stupid kid was, the Earth was doomed by 2023..
Too much for them to understand....They need to go back to school 😂
That would have to be preschool
Haha, idealogical and illogical. Nice. Too true too.
Albonnochio and Bowen are sitting watching with their fingers in their ears singing Lalalalalalalalalala to block out the FACTS..as usual.
Haha definitely I can picture that in my head from Pauline Hansons cartoons 😂😂
Get that up you Bowen
Albo thinks Joe is alive..
AI Joey
@@troywallace322 actor
A sock puppet would fool albo
😅
Bye bye Albo. 😁
It's not only the government who is anti nuclear, it is also gas and electrical energy companies, who have invested interests in renewables. Plus the fact they receive billions in subsidies from the government/taxpayer.
Gas and Coal Power Stations required yesterday
🤡👈Albo
🤡👈 Bowen.
😂
Don't forget Chalmers 😂
@@gegangen2008 and that other bloke wong
Can the Chinese turn-off the power from a distance ? They are supplying everything.
With Satellite's .
They certainly have a stranglehold on renewables and battery production.
They're running scared. It's too late. Like they do something on the last few days on the job.
They're afraid of losing the election and this is just a desperate attempt to gain a few votes.
If they were to win, this would disappear within nanoseconds.
How many people realise that snowy 2 can only provide a few percent of NSW total power . Batteries don't work so something has to
Your cooked Bowen, your done, any argument from you now is all 100% spin, that is now proven. Your snookered.
Going to need firm electric power from nuclear reactors to power the artificial intelligence industry. Renewables, just won't be enough.
Even Sweden has decided to take up the nuclear option from memory.
Sweden has had nuclear since 1947. (There's this thing called "wikipedia")
What ? ?
@@DANCEGARAGEPUNK What "What ? ?" ?
@@footbru not replying to you : )
All those A.I. data centres need cheap reliable energy to monitor you. It's not for your benefit.
But, Chris Bowen said that it can't be done...
ALBO is gone. I predict he will take between 8 to 10 labor held seats, with him. 😊
it’s great to get some real facts on the cost of nuclear over the period of generation which is 40% cheaper then Bowens madness
definitely voting Nuclear
ex alp voter
The actual figures are already well known. They very a little because of the older technology in the mix, but typically it is only marginally higher than coal over the full lifespan of the plant.
Cost out the same for so called renewable over a 60 to 80 year forward projection and see what costing come up :)
(P.S. That is about 4 to 5 near complete replacements of the total renewable generators.)
Albo and Black out Bowen going to announce this is misinformation and disinformation 😂
Well, if the allies say it's good, it must be good.. I'm pretty sure the aussie government will follow.
What a load of crap. Heres a fact. Even if we agreed to have nuclear power we would need to wait 10 years before we could even break ground to build one. Minimum 15 years before even 1 might be ready. So what happens in the next15 years? Any plans until then?
Coal!!
@@polarbear7255 Please do let the grown ups talk.
We can use a mix of wind, solar, gas, hydro and geothermal, all relatively cheap options.
The nuclear designs that are being proposed don't exist yet, in theory some of them could be quite economical especially the designs from Terra power if they pan out, they are proposing to reduce the regulatory requirements by seperating the nuclear and power generation units which would result in a cheaper more cost effective plant that could be commissioned sooner. But again, the design is just that, a design which is unproven.
Coal isn't the answer, it's by far the worst option for us mere mortals, more radioactivity has been released into the environment from coal fired plants then the combined total of that put out by the nuclear industry.
AMERICANS 😊VOTE FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP….DUMP THE TRAMP🤤NOW
? ? Democrats are bringing Nuclear
Vote Kamala ! : )
Old Mate, Black - Outs Bowen, and his "NICK-YUO-LAR" rhetoric...🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣
Dollars to donuts that Bowen and Bandt will ignore this. They don’t like their little world being disturbed by facts.
Nuclear does not compliment renewables. It 100% replaces renewables. It makes renewables redundant
The opposite is happening. IEA data shows that 85% of global power investment is going to new energy technologies and only 1% to nuclear.
Recent blowouts in nuclear projects such as Vogtle, Hinkley, Flamanville, Olkiluto and Sumner C have placed a risk premium on capital which makes renewables a much more attractive investment.
Last year global nuclear capacity went backwards, with closures exceeding new capacity coming online, yet 510 GW of renewables were added
@TheDesertraptor Not true. David Littleproud confirmed what any thoughtful person already knew - the LNP only plan to provide SOME of Australia's power from nukes, the rest to come from renewables and gas.
The US NRC would have to be revamped or abolished if new nuclear were a priority.
This not Trumps idea?
Why not the democrats' can not think of anything by themselves..
They want to build a wall now.
They are talking about securing the border now that they got 21 million illegals to vote in the upcoming election.
give me one thing the democrats have thought up by themselves that was a success ?
No Kamalas ! : )
OMG if we had Nuclear then fine we could keep maintaining them. Nuclear has an essential role which is 100% correct if you have already built them. The issue is building them from scratch. Anyway its now too late and a waste of time in Australia and NO our model is NOT renewable and storage. It also includes Gas Turbine back up which is what makes Renewables low cost and reliable for a 90%+ Renewable grid. (Just Renewables and Storage is NUTS expensive and NO it is NOT planned here).
Ok, so mine sites use solar panels for power, which are toxic..
They clear the bush then build massive solar farms on native land.
What happens when we get storms that damage these farms it will happen, then the toxic chemicals and the rainwater leak back into the ground ?
There is no 'anti nuclear' stance.
It is only about economics.
Nuclear is far too expensive
It's not political mate it's greed
We all know that they have skin in the game
How much cheaper could power be if we just stuck with coal. We have shit loads
No bank will finance a new coal plant in Australia due to the risk of it becoming a stranded asset. It is a 20th century technology trying to compete in a 21st century power market.
The last coal power plant in the UK, the birthplace of coal power, has just shut down.
@@tassied12 And old people are freezing to death because they can't afford the power bill now!
You forgot to mention that part about renewables.
@@ShaneMcGrath. High power prices are not the fault of renewables, but our old coal plants that keep breaking down.
The Australian Energy Regulator sets the benchmarks for consumer power prices. When they released the benchmarks for 2023/24 they gave the main reason as outages at coal plants over the last 2 years forcing expensive gas to be used to fill the gap. In the winter of 2022, up to 14 out of 47 coal generators were offline at once. Callide C is only just coming online after a catastrophic explosion in May 2021 that caused blackouts in SE Qld and into NSW. It had another unit offline for months due to a cooling tower problem All that is going to cost over $400 million to fix at the latest estimate
The AER also said that prices would have been even higher had not increased renewables output filled part of the gap
@@tassied12 How is gas more expensive ? There is like tons of it been drilled off W.A by the biggest companies in the world..
BHP
Chevron
Santos
Woodside.
Shell.
Etc, oh wait the last labour government signed a deal forgoing taxes on gas to big companies.
@@MrGrim2u1987 There is no gas reservation policy in the Eastern states, so gas plants there pay global prices for gas.
WA has a gas reservation policy, established by the Carpenter govt, despite opposition from the Howard govt.
This is the first I"ve heard of this, but if true it's the only thing I can agree with Biden on.
But the billion dollar question that Bowen is dying to ask, can you make shoes from nuclear power? 👞
nucular
Big no to nuclear for me.
This won't make mainstream news
How 'bout the US mind it's own business.
Albanese misinformation needs to be fined. Albanese should stop spreading lies. Can we kick him out
I'm presuming that the renewables part of this is for remote communities? No need to make two completely different power generating systems.
Under the new MaD laws i wont be able to comment about the level of misinformation from the govt on nuclear energy shortly.. Where are we going Australia. Why are these ideas so straight forward except for the people in charge.
So, you're saying that Albo and his cohorts, have been spewing "misinformation/disinformation" to the Australian public on this issue (and others too)?
I'd posit that if the Mis/Dis-information was Law, then the Australian public would not have been told about this U.S. report.
Egg on the government's face😅
Good that’l be running a big ole bug up the arse of Albozo for sure.
Vote Trump!!
Trump is a pedophile...proved
💯💯💯👏👏👏 wish he could be our prime minister instead of the clown we have
? ? Kamala is bringing nuclear ! : )
Vote Kamala for nuclear !
You guys can Goto merica if you want Trump, take your BS partisan politics/religion there with you.
I would argue that with nuclear you do not require wind and solar at all
$1.5B USD to restore a decomissioned reactor at a functioning plant, so how much is our electricity going to cost with nuclear considering we would be building from scratch.
I'm not opposed to nuclear as a green option but lets not kid ourselves, it is going to cost more, pamphlet aside from the lobby.
That's a fact jack Bowen
The Labor Party Crime Syndicate. Regressing Australia at a feverish pace.
This is based on America not Australia.
It's based on an industry paper lobbying for this solution, basically people with a vested interest with us going down this path.
Albo mr. Disinformation and misinformation and slithering snake Bowen, what a pair of empty vessels 😂😂😂
Nuclear doesn't "compete" with renewables, it makes them utterly pointless. Why bother with costly wind farms and Solar that have a 20 year life span and only provide intermittent power when nukes provide consistent and cheap electricity?
Nukes in the USA sell power at about 7 cents/KWH. What were you charged in your last power bill?
Turn that graph/ picture into bumper stickers!
The explanation given by the US as to why they want nuclear is the exact reason why albo and his gang don't want it.
Hey... ACMA, the e-Safety Commission's M&D Information Department, and the Australian Taxpayer...
🤥 "Cheapa Ewectwishitty!"
🤥 "My word is my bond."
🤥 "It's all Dutton's fault!"
🤥 "This is another fine mess you've gotten me into, Bowen!"
🤥 "...and FU2 Sleepy Joe! 🤬"
you forgot to mention microsoft reactivating three mile island for their server farms. a private company contracting a power station for its exclusive use is the next step in cheap electricity.
Hey Chris how many PWR are currently under construction in the US.
But we are Australians not Americans who really gives a shit what they think or do Israel doesn't.
They also have 300 million citizens you can't compare costs from a study done for north america.
Chris Bowens should work at Bunnings selling Duracell batteries
Albo spreading misinformation
We don’t make any of our own decisions. Just follow along like sheep 🐑. Pathetic leadership
If only albo took out the ear plugs and not try and take away our voice most Australians would have told him and saved the nation's embarrassment, Biden is more intelligent then albo
Well Kenny ,if you like Nuclear Power so much, why don’t you move to America, live next to a Power Plant, Try before you by.
I would say that renewables would complement Nuclear as the reliable baseload power source, not vice versa. Blackouts and $Blowouts are all we can expect from Bowen's and Labor/Greens push for 100% renewables, with more expensive energy bills.
I don’t believe that nuclear is needed at all in Australia we had clean burning coal stations they mothballed with some of the cleanest burning coal in the world .. where is all the spent nuclear fuel going to be dumped ?
there scared of trump doing the exact thing there talking about because he said that he is going to get out of the Paris agreement
Albo is dead in the water
Ermmm..won't be worth having nuclear energy if Putin does what he's thinking about doing...lol
Russia has a floating barge powering an Arctic town and future mining companies using twin reactors used in submarines…..
And toxic nuclear waste that I’m sure Sky news would be happy to store in its backyard 😂
DON'T FORGET what it does to hard working farmers who work to produce food ..that we buy in our supermarkets!!❤❤❤
A nuc aircraft which has 2 nuc power stations can power a population of 25000 people. That's from aircraft carriers. Go nuck
Nuck? It's a Nuclear Wessel😂
Great that the Democrats are bringing this in !
The USA is moving forward with Kamala ! : )
What happens to intractable waste in Australia ? Nuclear energy is a one-way street ! Are plenty of kids going to become poorly-paid scientists ? Name one private Australian company which employs scientists. Presumption, denial and speculation are not forms of risk management.
Back your claims about nuclear science with money - build a school of sciences and pay decent wages.
i've worked on privately owned farms that employ scientists.
"low carbon" ? How much carbon do they think will be produced in manufacturing the required components for nuclear power? It's a shell game.
your argument applies the same to renewables i'm afraid... try again!
As a miner, hate to say this, 9000 hours of heavy diesel machinery to get your the resource's for your 1 tesla, care to explain how that is green ?
How many hours do you think we will need for them giant batteries ?
Your green dream renewables is a scam.
Plus a couple of side notes, a tesla on fire in California used two fire trucks and 1 million liters of water before the got it out.{ not very green wasting all that water, all those toxic chemicals in the air}
Just think about when you have a multi crash on a highway involving burning electric cars.
Yes it happens more than our censored media tells us.
@@ThatGuy-ze5kk I've made the same argument about 'renewables'. I understand it applies. To make sensible choices we need people with sense, they're too few and hard to find.
Thes so and so's be gone soon
What.... common sense 😂😂
That makes for a serious policy for the Democrats - potentially a winner. Does the Trump campaign have an equivalent or better policy?