Objective Personality ANIMALS l A New Take On Introverts and Extroverts

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 сен 2024
  • Are you a Consume, Blast, Sleep or Play type and what is the difference? This is my interpretation of the Objective Personality animals.
    Learn how I connect the classic OP concepts to Introversion, Extroversion, Judging and Perceiving.
    See how the animals can be used to explain how you relate to boundaries, energy management, and more.
    Check out objectivepersonality.com to learn more about Dave & Shannons system.
    #objectivepersonality #animals #mbti
    FAQ
    You can check out objective personality at: www.objectivepersonality.com
    You can test my Objective Personality self-assessment test at www.erikthor.c...
    I appreciate Objective Personality for their desire to make the study of psychology more scientific. I will try my best to help them develop and better understand different concepts while doing my best to connect their ideas to Carl Jung and classic Jungian views. I will be questioning and criticizing what I see as problems and issues with the Objective Personality model.
    I do not consider Objective Personality objective by any degree. Take their model with a grain of salt. They have not been able to prove anything they say and are still in the early process of gathering data. It may take years before they land anywhere consistent.
    I do not think Dave & Shannon are always able to type people accurately. They may be able to type similarly, but you can train two people to consistently hit the wrong spot over and over again.
    I think you should trust your own view of yourself and only seek external evidence in order to verify and understand yourself better.
    OP argue that traumas and problems are innate and that we are born with certain anxieties and problems. I do not think trauma is a personality type and I think it is wrong to assert that you are born with a certain trauma or anxiety. These ideas lead to a static mindset and can be very toxic.
    I am doing these series because I am tired of everyone running off and creating their own models and want to help bring typology more in line.
    I am known for my videos on personality psychology. I promote personal growth, self-acceptance, and flow. I want people to live more meaningful lives. I want to help people find their passion. I do not practice a specific system of typology. I understand all perspectives and focus on teaching you what works. I believe in an ethical approach to personality psychology. The goal is to help you understand yourself and to promote mental health and well being.
    16 Personalities, Myers Briggs Type Indicator, The Enneagram, Personality Types, Personal Growth, Mental Health, INFP Personality Type Videos.
    Check out my website:
    www.erikthor.com
    Become a patron:
    / erikthor Join the community @ / discord

Комментарии • 19

  • @ErikThor
    @ErikThor  2 года назад +15

    I plan to continue this series until at least January and will be going over all their channels, so subscribe for more videos like this.
    FAQ
    You can check out objective personality at: www.objectivepersonality.com
    You can test my Objective Personality self-assessment test at www.erikthor.com/objective-personality-test/
    I appreciate Objective Personality for their desire to make the study of psychology more scientific. I will try my best to help them develop and better understand different concepts while doing my best to connect their ideas to Carl Jung and classic Jungian views. I will be questioning and criticizing what I see as problems and issues with the Objective Personality model.
    I do not consider Objective Personality objective by any degree. Take their model with a grain of salt. They have not been able to prove anything they say and are still in the early process of gathering data. It may take years before they land anywhere consistent.
    I do not think Dave & Shannon are always able to type people accurately. They may be able to type similarly, but you can train two people to consistently hit the wrong spot over and over again.
    I think you should trust your own view of yourself and only seek external evidence in order to verify and understand yourself better.
    OP argue that traumas and problems are innate and that we are born with certain anxieties and problems. I do not think trauma is a personality type and I think it is wrong to assert that you are born with a certain trauma or anxiety. These ideas lead to a static mindset and can be very toxic.
    I am doing these series because I am tired of everyone running off and creating their own models and want to help bring typology more in line.

  • @AndeAndrea
    @AndeAndrea 2 года назад

    I’m really glad you have OPS videos. I don’t comment often but I consume a ton of content & information.
    My action orders are SC/PB ; with double activated sleep and consume.
    So that’s mostly how I spend my time (and how I conceptualized my companies)
    It makes navigating thru external blast very difficult for me and exhausting.
    The internal business systems I have to set up even within my own companies to accomplish blast
    affectively is insane.
    I find blast last types and the sexual modalities in general fascinating
    and a huge nuance to OPS I love. I could write a novel about my thoughts on blast last.

  • @humanbeing1754
    @humanbeing1754 2 года назад +3

    You should highlight on important points such as, Consume and Sleep are for the self, and Play and Blast are for the tribe
    Consume is, Di + Oe, basically introverted deciding + extroverted observing, basically gathering information for self
    Blast is, Oi + De, basically giving out the organized information to others in relation to tribe's reasons because De means tribe's reasons
    Play is, Oe + De, basically immediately giving out info to the tribe by tribe reasons
    Sleep is, Oi + Di, basically processing info only for the self
    The thing is, when De is involved, things are done for the tribe, by the reasons the tribe has, so Play and Blast are selfless
    And, when Di is involved, things are done for the self, by reasons of the self, so Consume and Sleep are selfish
    Those who have an animal stack like, SC/B(P), it means they spend most of their time in organizing information for the self and also consuming information for the self and they spend little time in doing work for the tribe or communicate with the tribe
    SC/P(B), CS/B(P) etc combinations are selfish people who aren't giving respect to tribe's reasons
    And on the other hand, something like PB/C(S) are those people who care too much about the tribe but don't take care of themselves at all

  • @hananoush4109
    @hananoush4109 2 года назад +2

    Hi, I relate the most to « sleep » and I think I’m going to enjoy very much this series. Thank you !

  • @westcoastswingmusic
    @westcoastswingmusic 2 года назад

    Great job explaining these thoroughly.
    To answer your question at the end, for the energy animals, Dr. Andrew Huberman shared information from a study that introverts release more dopamine faster in social situations, whereas extroverts needed more socializing because they release less dopamine.
    The info animals both seem to to relate to the judging/perceiving axis as your diagram shows.
    It makes me wonder why the addition of these 4 animals Judging/Blast, Perceiving/Consume, Introversion/Sleep, Extroversion/Play if these are already included in the Observer and Decider coins. The Introversion/Sleep or Extroversion/Play simply corresponds to the Oi or Oe and the Di or De.
    For example: I'm INFP
    FiNe is the classic arrangement which would be Sleep Consume.
    I might be a jumper FiSi. I still consider myself Sleep Consume.
    I don't believe FiSi changes it to Sleep Blast. It wouldn't correspond to ISFP either since they have Se/ Oe+S which seems more Play + Consume.
    Thanks for sharing perspectives from other systems.
    I am so curious about Harry's model. I like his demeanor, yet have gaps in my understanding. I especially like how he says the 8th function can circle back around and be activated by our first function.
    This rings true for my Ti. Harry seems to be on to something, but the explanations are very abstract, with his system's technical jargon and few examples, illustrations, or analogies to help me grasp it.
    Thanks again Erik for sharing what you have distilled from these other systems.

  • @fishmerised5835
    @fishmerised5835 2 года назад +2

    Thank you for the useful explainer. I took your test and came up with CSPB which is how I typed myself using OPS.

  • @BethanyLowe8773
    @BethanyLowe8773 2 года назад +1

    It seems so odd that they call these Animals when data-gathering is the kind of thing that we consider to be especially human! I'd love a backtrack to explain why these modes are thought (by OP) to be a fundamental part of personality (over some other things).

    • @ErikThor
      @ErikThor  2 года назад +2

      I agree, the term Animals is a weird metaphor and so far not working for me haha

    • @timefortee
      @timefortee 2 года назад +1

      Yes!! It is so silly, and yet apparently grown adults talk about "their animals" and how they've got "feminine Fe" etc with a straight face LoL

  • @anandaalvarez4336
    @anandaalvarez4336 2 года назад

    👏

  • @satoshinakamoto5710
    @satoshinakamoto5710 2 года назад

    Sleep/Introversion as having narrow interests makes sense. You'd think Blast/Judging would be more narrower because it's focused on getting things done. But it makes sense that introverts are really only truly introverted in things outside of their limited interests. This applies to both introverted perception and judging. Probably more to introverted perception since Consume/Perceiving applies to introverted judging.

  • @nanettewinston-armstrong9294
    @nanettewinston-armstrong9294 2 года назад +1

    Hi Erik 🌞 I feel I might be , Blast “ type according to that model ‘ . With that in Mind - I think , usually Persnickety People who are of a Specialty ( that are Not seasoned ‘ , however Cruised ‘ somehow ) opinion of particular Certain things ‘ are maybe , The Consumers ? Great to bounce Ideas withe , engaging Conversation .. However , Not necessarily as The fellow colleagues collaborating as other Blasters - Of course in A Prolific Providential Production And or Project , Posterity scale And level of Mindfulness .
    Some enable in a vicarious recreational Common exchange way of Dynamic 💟

    • @6Churches
      @6Churches 2 года назад +1

      Great to see you engaging with these ideas. It does get a little more complicated as there are many different types of Blast.
      Four modality types MM MF FM and FF (from most pushy to most gentle with instruction)
      and four temperament types NF NT SF and ST (where Ni or Si is paired with Fe or Te)

    • @nanettewinston-armstrong9294
      @nanettewinston-armstrong9294 2 года назад +1

      @@6Churches strictly As a novice psych student ‘ / Village engager HopenWishing for Humanity Plateau🤍✨🙏🏻💓♒️💟🌌
      In My Youth , I took a Psychology Class at SMC . After a Year off Working a first Job proceeding the Proficiency Test out of High School early in the 11 th Grade . The Psych Class at Santa Monica Jr . College was mostly coming from
      Dr . Carl Jung perspective . The Teacher referred to The Rider Waite Tarot deck Major Arcana as Archetype discussed , which I thought was Interesting 🤔

  • @cjclementine434
    @cjclementine434 2 года назад

    Erik, have you formed a partnership with Dave and Shan of OP?

    • @ErikThor
      @ErikThor  2 года назад +6

      No, I am pursuing this independently and as a critic trying to make sense of it, not a supporter 😊 See my FAQ in the description. I also plan to talk CPT and other models later.

  • @TheLategates
    @TheLategates 2 года назад

    I haven't watched the entire vid but I read through your FAQ and I think you’re strawmanning OPS and putting words in their mouth. For example, “OP argue that traumas and problems are innate and that we are born with certain anxieties and problems.” No, OP argues that you’re born with predominate functions. Functions themselves are neutral.

  • @Dgn404
    @Dgn404 3 месяца назад

    I think your understanding of sleep and play is not quite right