Prerequisites for LTI Systems (Laplace Transform)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 янв 2025

Комментарии • 66

  • @ken6277
    @ken6277 2 года назад +6

    I am literally so happy that you exist, there is light at the end of the EE tunnel when I watch your videos.

  • @rationalthinker9612
    @rationalthinker9612 2 года назад +43

    You literally just pulled a bunch of new things out of the air without explaining their background. Where did h(t) come from and why is it a transfer function? What is a transfer function? You applied this property of LaPlace , L{f(t-a)}=L{f(t)}×e^-as, and didn't explain how you got that or prove it's true. You didn't explain why H(s) = Y(s) / X(s). You also just randomly said the inverse LaPlace of e^(as) is d(t-a)...no explanation of how you know that or where it came from. Most of your videos are really good. This one was horrible.

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 3 года назад +10

    Laplace? More like “this is the place”…for learning. Thank you for uploading these very informative lectures!

    • @omarilyas6103
      @omarilyas6103 3 года назад +6

      that was terrible bro, but respect for posting it stiwl

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 года назад +1

      @@omarilyas6103 Haha yeah I know, but I still like posting puns because it's led to some really cool conversations! Plus I think it drives up engagement on videos, and I try to support the channels that way. Another strategy I've adopted is replying to comments that mention an upcoming test, and asking how it went. I've gotten a few conversations out of that as well.

    • @zeusor
      @zeusor Год назад +1

      you are still alive dud?

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP Год назад

      @@zeusor Yep

    • @zeusor
      @zeusor Год назад +1

      @@PunmasterSTP so how's life tho?

  • @BECSAQUIB
    @BECSAQUIB 3 года назад +2

    Great work!❤️

  • @theNeuo13
    @theNeuo13 5 лет назад +3

    Sir, in minute 6:56, you changed the +infinity into 0. This made the integration limits from -infinity to 0!!!

    • @wulantsabita9843
      @wulantsabita9843 4 года назад +1

      yes, can someone explain/correct this?

    • @charankumar4267
      @charankumar4267 4 года назад +1

      @@wulantsabita9843 if you know the definition of unit step then you can understand that

    • @dhrumilshah5000
      @dhrumilshah5000 3 года назад +1

      @@charankumar4267 I know it but didn't understand why we changed the limit from +infinity to zero. Can you explain it please?

    • @parthaprateempatra4278
      @parthaprateempatra4278 3 года назад +1

      unit step function is defined for x>=0

  • @pavankalyansripathi1807
    @pavankalyansripathi1807 2 года назад +1

    I have a doubt why we are multiplying f(t) with u(t) ?
    but through this video it is cleared
    thanks a lot

  • @Gayatrisoni1974
    @Gayatrisoni1974 10 месяцев назад +1

    i have a doubt here you have taken limit from - infinity to infinity but in maths we studied limit from 0 to infinity for laplace please explain

    • @Burak-hv3gm
      @Burak-hv3gm 10 месяцев назад

      I am confused too. Laplace of constant number is a/s. I think there is a mistake

  • @kurapatianwesh9114
    @kurapatianwesh9114 7 лет назад +4

    sir can i say that we are discussing about the impulse response for LTI systems only to discuss about the properties of LTI system in a simpler way.but how does it make it simpler

  • @ankursantoria5401
    @ankursantoria5401 7 лет назад +4

    Sir please upload lectures on convolution.

  • @c.j.9773
    @c.j.9773 4 года назад +5

    Sir can you please provide notes of these videoes?

  • @samarthshah302
    @samarthshah302 7 лет назад +13

    how did you get X(s)e^-s?

    • @sayan486
      @sayan486 7 лет назад +16

      L{f(t-a)}=L{f(t)}×e^-as

    • @inwarsnighter
      @inwarsnighter 3 года назад +1

      @@sayan486 Can you tell me, L{f(t-a)}=L{f(t)}×e^-as it is one of laplace tranform properties or what else?
      sorry for my language if it's wrong.

    • @sumanthbadugu5109
      @sumanthbadugu5109 3 года назад +1

      @@inwarsnighter Yes it is a property of Laplace transform

  • @jasneetsingh4018
    @jasneetsingh4018 7 лет назад +2

    sir when will u teach fourier series and transform?

  • @bionic3604
    @bionic3604 2 года назад +4

    why is the transform of x(t-1) -> x(s)e^-s ???

  • @mrhumza7618
    @mrhumza7618 7 лет назад +2

    sir please upload video on convolution in time domain.

  • @himanshuarora1910
    @himanshuarora1910 7 лет назад +9

    how to calculate laplace of x(t-1)

    • @sayan486
      @sayan486 7 лет назад +5

      L{f(t-a)}=L{f(t)}×e^-as

    • @haiderriaz6793
      @haiderriaz6793 5 лет назад +1

      @@sayan486 shouldn't there be -e^-as after where you ended you equation?

    • @abhaykondru3570
      @abhaykondru3570 4 года назад +1

      a=1

    • @hanuma8658
      @hanuma8658 11 месяцев назад

      Shifting theorem L{f(x-X)}= F(s).e^-sX

  • @ErSubh
    @ErSubh 7 лет назад +1

    Thank you very much sir.....

  • @kurapatianwesh9114
    @kurapatianwesh9114 7 лет назад +2

    cant we define impulse response for LTV variant system

  • @AbuSaud.Christos
    @AbuSaud.Christos 5 лет назад +1

    Great !

  • @inwarsnighter
    @inwarsnighter 3 года назад

    Can anyone tell me, L{f(t-a)}=L{f(t)}×e^-as it is one of laplace tranform properties or what else?
    sorry for my language if it's wrong.

  • @shivamsharma-wm8pp
    @shivamsharma-wm8pp 7 лет назад

    U(t) is step signal that limit you used in example but you said Impulse response used to get system response. May be it's because of Laplace integration we have to take during convert "t" to "S" domain. point me if i'm incorrect.

  • @pavankumaruppu102
    @pavankumaruppu102 7 лет назад +2

    U told that split systems are time variant

    • @pavankumaruppu102
      @pavankumaruppu102 7 лет назад

      Neso Academy ruclips.net/video/emRV4juY17s/видео.html at 5:40

    • @pavankumaruppu102
      @pavankumaruppu102 7 лет назад

      Neso Academy for split systems do we apply convolution integral

    • @alphasatari
      @alphasatari 6 лет назад +1

      It is not split system. It's TIV system.
      y(t)=a(t)x(t-1)+b(t)x(t+1)
      a(t)=1 t0
      this is split. here we define coefficient a(t) and b(t).

    • @Code65115
      @Code65115 4 года назад

      @@alphasatari thanks bro

  • @yaldarazimanesh7328
    @yaldarazimanesh7328 Год назад

    My first born son shall be named "Sajeed".

  • @charankumar4267
    @charankumar4267 4 года назад

    sir, integral of 0(zero) is some constant. i think you should modify that.

  • @jahansaid6382
    @jahansaid6382 5 лет назад

    Thank you !

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 3 года назад

      This is the only reaction from NESO. Don't they like feedback?
      If you can't handle criticism, stay away from science!

  • @siddharthmehta6976
    @siddharthmehta6976 7 лет назад

    Can I get written notes of these lectures?