Awesome stuff Bryan. I just want to say that vehemently disagree with you not referring to those 84-85 star cards as rookies lol. I know it just comes down to each person’s own definition and criteria for what a rookie card is. I’d be lying if I said my view of the 86 fleer and star 101 hasn’t drastically changed over the last 6 months. I just can’t call the 86 fleer, 3rd year card, a rookie when it doesn’t have any college stats on the back and instead has his two prior Bulls seasons. If there were no other licensed card before that one, I would concede. But, here we are with a paradigm shift on the hobby’s thoughts.
Pack pulled or it’s not a rookie. To each his own. It’s really not relevant. Both cards are must have cards and I put both cards into one for a reason so no need to shoot the messenger, I just speak for most of the people in hobby that were a little bit sick of the condescending star pump at the moment. It’ll pass soon.
@@cajuncardboardlike you said it doesn’t matter because both cards are sought after but I’m not sure who made that theory up about pack pulled or not a rookie. There are humongous rookie cards still made to this day that aren’t pack pulled from complete sets. Panini sells prizm basketball complete sets that are numbered and none of the cards are in a pack accept the box topper. It’s a box set. Basketball, football and baseball. Huge rookies.
1995-96 Topps Gallery Player's Private Issue (#1-18). Inserted 1:96 Series Two Hobby packs o 1996-97f Topps Stadium Club. #19-144 only were inserted 1:12 packs into 1995-96 Topps Gallery. According to Beckett "Quite a hullabaloo was made over the discovery that Topps had never released the first 18 cards in this set (the Masters subset) due to an unannounced production flaw at the printing plant. For many months, it was believed that Private Issue parallels existed for these first eighteen cards (as was stated on Topps media literature) but the cards were simply not turning up on the open market as wholesale dealer buy offers skyrocketed. Topps made good on these 18 cards the following year by producing them and inserting them into series two hobby packs of 1996-97 Stadium Club."
Oh, that’s right they forgot about it and so they put it in the other product, even though it came in the other product. I still think it’s a topps gallery don’t you?
Nice recap once again Bryan 👍🏼 I agree with you on the Star Jordan’s- crazy how much they’ve run lately even in the lower grades! 🤯 I can see warming up to the 101 but it’s nuts how all of them are up so much.
power in the key is a nightmare to grade.... although the images arent amazing really close up- that is a 10! most of the cards looked like a dog chewed the edges- they give it a 10 if the card still has print up to the edge- since its very sensitive on the front- the back is given leeway- there would be no 10's without understanding the cards fragility. I met Jordan at his public bday party in 1996- and went to his camp in the 90s- dude isnt that fragile!! but the card is.. unfortunately
Adam, thanks for that info, I’m with you but given what you said there should be no tens. You don’t change your grading standards for a particular card because it’s more condition sensitive. If that were the case, there would be PMG 9s and 10s. I’m not aware of PSA changing their standards for one card versus another when it comes to assigning numerical grades
Are you sure? I need to take a closer look, but I swear I thought it looked like a blazers uniform. I will be very ashamed if I missed a player from Louisiana on a card! No excuse for me to botch that!!!
Closer to 10th best. There’s really no legit argument for top 5, dude had one MVP and his career trajectory looks a lot different if he’s not in LA (Shaq wasn’t leaving Orlando to join him in Sacramento or wherever)
Awesome stuff Bryan. I just want to say that vehemently disagree with you not referring to those 84-85 star cards as rookies lol. I know it just comes down to each person’s own definition and criteria for what a rookie card is. I’d be lying if I said my view of the 86 fleer and star 101 hasn’t drastically changed over the last 6 months. I just can’t call the 86 fleer, 3rd year card, a rookie when it doesn’t have any college stats on the back and instead has his two prior Bulls seasons. If there were no other licensed card before that one, I would concede. But, here we are with a paradigm shift on the hobby’s thoughts.
Pack pulled or it’s not a rookie. To each his own. It’s really not relevant. Both cards are must have cards and I put both cards into one for a reason so no need to shoot the messenger, I just speak for most of the people in hobby that were a little bit sick of the condescending star pump at the moment. It’ll pass soon.
I'd rather have the Fleer, nothing appealing to me with Jordan grabbing a rebound behind Quintin Dailey
@@cajuncardboardI hope you’re wrong but you’re probably right. I’ll be watching on the sidelines.
@@tubenachosif it were just about the image I’d be with you 100%
@@cajuncardboardlike you said it doesn’t matter because both cards are sought after but I’m not sure who made that theory up about pack pulled or not a rookie. There are humongous rookie cards still made to this day that aren’t pack pulled from complete sets. Panini sells prizm basketball complete sets that are numbered and none of the cards are in a pack accept the box topper. It’s a box set. Basketball, football and baseball. Huge rookies.
1995-96 Topps Gallery Player's Private Issue (#1-18). Inserted 1:96 Series Two Hobby packs o 1996-97f Topps Stadium Club. #19-144 only were inserted 1:12 packs into 1995-96 Topps Gallery. According to Beckett "Quite a hullabaloo was made over the discovery that Topps had never released the first 18 cards in this set (the Masters subset) due to an unannounced production flaw at the printing plant. For many months, it was believed that Private Issue parallels existed for these first eighteen cards (as was stated on Topps media literature) but the cards were simply not turning up on the open market as wholesale dealer buy offers skyrocketed. Topps made good on these 18 cards the following year by producing them and inserting them into series two hobby packs of 1996-97 Stadium Club."
Oh, that’s right they forgot about it and so they put it in the other product, even though it came in the other product. I still think it’s a topps gallery don’t you?
@@MatthewMar Love the depth!
Nice recap once again Bryan 👍🏼 I agree with you on the Star Jordan’s- crazy how much they’ve run lately even in the lower grades! 🤯 I can see warming up to the 101 but it’s nuts how all of them are up so much.
It’ll be interesting to see where it all goes over the next 60-90 days.
The 96 Jordan credentials is that price because it's the first of its kind.
Cherry Blossoms are awesome cards!!!
That Kobe/Shaq patch lord almighty 😳 😍
I know right? Wow. 🤯
No need to apologize to the Kobe and Lebron collectors, it’s all about MJ 😂. Great stuff Cajun
Hi Cajun. I believe these Topps Gallery with their Private parallel were inserted into TSC packs.
Yeah, I can’t believe. I totally forgot about that, but that doesn’t change the fact that they were topps gallery in my personal opinion.
That old label Kobe PSA 10 Hardware has quite a bit of surface wear on the front top right quadrant.
lebron sp authentic went way up(7500) from last comp....last psa 9 in march did 5188
“Goat skin and monkey breath” 😂😂😂
SSP dude. Trust me
Congrats on the sales💰💰
Thanks brett
also.. great video as always!
A because im a diehard collector
I bet total psa pop of all star jordans ...all of them. Is < 25% of 86 fleer jordan pop
It’s way less than 25%. It’s probably 5-10% but the demand for 86 fleer is probably 50x the star 101.
power in the key is a nightmare to grade.... although the images arent amazing really close up- that is a 10!
most of the cards looked like a dog chewed the edges- they give it a 10 if the card still has print up to the edge- since its very sensitive on the front- the back is given leeway- there would be no 10's without understanding the cards fragility. I met Jordan at his public bday party in 1996- and went to his camp in the 90s- dude isnt that fragile!! but the card is.. unfortunately
Adam, thanks for that info, I’m with you but given what you said there should be no tens. You don’t change your grading standards for a particular card because it’s more condition sensitive. If that were the case, there would be PMG 9s and 10s. I’m not aware of PSA changing their standards for one card versus another when it comes to assigning numerical grades
@@cajuncardboard yeah good point- I've been looking at power in the key- they all kinda have some issue- i agree with you on "no 10's"
John Hot Rod Williams in Sun uniform
Are you sure? I need to take a closer look, but I swear I thought it looked like a blazers uniform. I will be very ashamed if I missed a player from Louisiana on a card! No excuse for me to botch that!!!
C'mon Bryan haha, that's so obviously a Sun's uniform. I'm disappointed too, esp from a die hard 90s NBA cards collector
CC, yes, selling whale MJ to build up war chest... what are in your cross hairs? Waiting for your update.
It’s coming. Some great eye candy. I bought 9 cards with the sales proceeds from this fanatics weekly. 😳
Kobe 3rd best player? U might be a lebron fan huh
Nope. Furthest from it. You must be new
@@cajuncardboard u sound like a kobe hater foo
Closer to 10th best. There’s really no legit argument for top 5, dude had one MVP and his career trajectory looks a lot different if he’s not in LA (Shaq wasn’t leaving Orlando to join him in Sacramento or wherever)
@@mcap8396😂😂
@@albertolivera3735 He was the best player in the league once in his career..
Love it.