The more amount you can build transistors in a chip, the smaller it should be. Now it reaches quantum scale where you would never be able to predict due to uncertainty principle of Heissenberg. Luckily, we can build a quantum computer. WELCOME TO THE FUTURE. We are in the maximum stage of technology. Moore's law is gonna be completely broken somewhere in 2030-2050. If you don't believe in teleportation, vanishing object to a196884th dimension, or planning for human immortality. Believe me, it's been done in CERN, UN human genome project, Norwegia and Japan.
*BUT* what conditions are responsible for that forecast specifically? What conditions the silicon chips in regards to doubling the amount of transistors that they can take in that specific 2 year timeframe? That's what i don't understand....possibly because i'm no HW guy.
Isn't there another theory which says if something becomes hard to use/make, or if we want more of something we will make it better. Before transistors vacuum tubes were used, they were unreliable so scientists went out to invent the transistor. I think scientists will invent something that may be even more powerful than transistors. I hope they do (after a while at least). A real-life example would be copper wires. Copper started to get expensive, the countries with copper sold it for high prices, coppers were in high demand because they were used in wires, then scientists invented fiber optic cables. The demand for copper depleted, and now our wires are made from sand (or something, can't fully remember). citation - ruclips.net/video/ByeyFfOHgQA/видео.html (it's a film theory film lol).
I hope this isn't a stupid question but does anyone know if we're using two years (pre-2013) or three years (post-2013) in the exam if they don't specify which year? The exam is multiple choice so I don't want to get something wrong on a technicality. eg. "How often does transistor density double according to Moore's Law?" a) Every two years. b) Every three years. I ask because Moore's Law states two years, and it is our observation, not Moore's, that states every three years after 2013. - n7521758
Well if the Steam-machine no longer can do his work ...it's time to change "things" into other things.... Perhaps into parts of this atom on the inside of it,.............
If anyone is interested, I've just uploaded video which shows how transistor count changed from 1971 to 2020, check it out! ruclips.net/video/Glk1Osql1KQ/видео.html
I WATCHED THIS VIDEO IN 2X SPEED SO MY PC CAN GET 4 TIMES FASTER EVERY YEAR!
Underrated comment
Ah I get it, Really fast is faster than faster.
So it should be really fast is really fast than faster
@@Alex_Mercer_ I this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
Explained well and fast, well done.
lol, I love the pissed off scientist at the end xD
Ya
What an amazing video! Thanks for this
what a way of teaching....I loved it. And yes moore is looking handsome.lol
Moore's Law aplies to all industries, but not at the same rate.
Watching this video with my iPad instead of doing science 😂
Great and Short explanation !
So WHY can we fit more and more transistors on chips?
The more amount you can build transistors in a chip, the smaller it should be. Now it reaches quantum scale where you would never be able to predict due to uncertainty principle of Heissenberg.
Luckily, we can build a quantum computer. WELCOME TO THE FUTURE. We are in the maximum stage of technology. Moore's law is gonna be completely broken somewhere in 2030-2050.
If you don't believe in teleportation, vanishing object to a196884th dimension, or planning for human immortality. Believe me, it's been done in CERN, UN human genome project, Norwegia and Japan.
Sebastian Lukito lol stfu with your scientology garbage
@@Ayayron_e3 why are you watching a vid on moore's law if you're not interested in the advancement of technology
@@hawksandwich4742 read my comment and open a dictionary would ya? I never said I wasn't interested in science and tech.
@@hawksandwich4742 hes interested in scientology idiot
nice animation
*BUT* what conditions are responsible for that forecast specifically?
What conditions the silicon chips in regards to doubling the amount of transistors that they can take in that specific 2 year timeframe? That's what i don't understand....possibly because i'm no HW guy.
I keep re-watching the beginning with the transistors and adders. I want to get it but I can't fully grasp it!
What if we made a new transistor then it will take 10 more years and so on?
Please tell me if I am getting it wrong or right?¿
Excellent Video.
I love this video thanks !
Moore's law might be ending.
5 years later and still not true. what makes you come to that conclusion?
Isn't there another theory which says if something becomes hard to use/make, or if we want more of something we will make it better. Before transistors vacuum tubes were used, they were unreliable so scientists went out to invent the transistor.
I think scientists will invent something that may be even more powerful than transistors.
I hope they do (after a while at least).
A real-life example would be copper wires. Copper started to get expensive, the countries with copper sold it for high prices, coppers were in high demand because they were used in wires, then scientists invented fiber optic cables. The demand for copper depleted, and now our wires are made from sand (or something, can't fully remember).
citation - ruclips.net/video/ByeyFfOHgQA/видео.html (it's a film theory film lol).
How does that 4 bit transistor looking diagram work?
thats called a full adder circuit...u can google it and there are plenty of videos explaining
Animation is great :) how do they do it?
I hope this isn't a stupid question but does anyone know if we're using two years (pre-2013) or three years (post-2013) in the exam if they don't specify which year? The exam is multiple choice so I don't want to get something wrong on a technicality.
eg. "How often does transistor density double according to Moore's Law?"
a) Every two years.
b) Every three years.
I ask because Moore's Law states two years, and it is our observation, not Moore's, that states every three years after 2013. - n7521758
Since the question specifically asks according to Moore’s law, I’d go with answer choice A. I hope this helps you on your exam 🙌
@@henry_evan little bit late
@@jeremyjemba 😂😂😂😂lol
Thanks this saved my ass I might just get an A
"Chips"? Oh! you mean those delicious Silicon Waffers?
It's a self fulfilling prophecy imo
are you an intel fanboy?
Nice sarcasm at the end !!!
me, watching the full adder work :👁️👄👁️
We are wasting computational power on playing game
Lol
Nothing wrong with that ...lol
I don't get it.....
18 months, not two years
1:38 asic bitcoin mining equipment after two years
Well if the Steam-machine no longer can do his work ...it's time to change "things" into other things....
Perhaps into parts of this atom on the inside of it,.............
Say that to the New 3080 GPU with 28 billion transistors
so what? even decade old one has billion
"MONOPOLY"
If anyone is interested, I've just uploaded video which shows how transistor count changed from 1971 to 2020, check it out!
ruclips.net/video/Glk1Osql1KQ/видео.html
How much for divorce paperwork? Send text back
Are kehna kya chahte ho
I know . That I do not Know
😂
hhhhhha
This law is outdated
I don't think so yet
But soon
How is it outdated? You can't make a transistor smaller than an atom
It was always a retarted law
it is NOT A LAW.