@@IAmAwsomeO1 nah that’s Donald. Putin’s puppet. Putin is setting up the NWO and once he gets the US divided and weakened enough, he’ll throw Donald under the bus and take over
The interview was presented as a one-on-one organic conversation. It's what 60 minutes interviews are known for. Pretending this was merely an efficiency edit is dishonest, especially when Kamala's ramblings were already an established component of her critique. I didn't vote for Trumpo, but this is political distortion at it's purest.
@@daveisbrill that’s exactly the attitude Donald wants you to have. Flood the zone so regular people get tired and ignore it all, and so the left can’t keep up with everything he’s doing.
@@agentofchaos7456Rogan has stated multiple times he would have loved to have her on his show. All he wanted was no less than one hour of uninterrupted time with zero talking points. He said he wanted to get to know the person behind the candidate. She demanded 20 minutes and Rogan could only ask the questions laid out by her campaign.
@@agentofchaos7456 according to who? Reddit? The man has stated that multiple times with multiple different guests including during the President Trump interview.
Yes, Trump is working this for his benefit but Cenk is missing the other point. Why did CBS withhold releasing the entire Harris interview when they've released full interviews in the past with other politicians. That's the reason this molehill turned into a mountain.
@@steelehere1 wrong! Thank God trump decided to come out of his beautiful life and put up with this crap. I'm sick of you on the left using emotion as an argument. First you try and claim to know what trump is thinking than you claim to know what he's going to do on that. Instead try and see that USAID resisted all past attempts for a congressional audit and Elon is doing an audit agency by agency to find waste,fruad,and abuse. He is backed by the president who told everyone that he was going to do a government audit if elected. again.
If CBS interviewed Trump and he gave a Kamala-esque bumbling word salad answer, they'd say "This makes him look like an idiot, leave it all in." Kamala gives a bumbling word salad answer, CBS would say "guys, we have time constraints, commercials....let's cut it down for time purposes " This is why she didn't do Rogan. No backup.
TYT LOGIC: Your opponent cheats. You still come out victorious. You call out your opponent to expose cheating TYT: "WHY DOES IT EVEN MATTTERRR" Absolute brain dead take.
OMG you two just lost all credibility Anna i a SO disappointed in you! I watched the unedited vs the edited. They changed quite a bit. They made her look "better". I expect the "trump is a whiner" bit from Cenk, but from you we usually get the real deal.Did you watch the whole thing or just read the talking points Cenk prepared?
Aka the one time Ana doesn't grift to appeal to you guys you start crying. If birthing person doesnt say Kamala bad 24/7 you snowflakes have a meltdown. Yall are so pathetic. 😂
Another bad take from Ana. CBS should be held accountable because they completely changed her answer with another one from a different question. You guys need to do more research.
They just showed that what you are saying is absolutely false. They just didn't show the entire response which happens in editing all the time. But now you want the government to control free press. This is how democracy dies.
@@leeg1069 freee press? lol legacy media is NOT free press democracy dies when the institutions fall in line behind a political party and parrots talking points like the state run media it is. covid showed us that and now all of the "facts" are turning out to be wrong
Is this coming from the same group who was post screen shots of left wing politicians speeches when they raised their hands and tried to pretend like they were doing the n**i salute. How about you air those full speech ya hypocrite.
"In terms of, in regards too, in the context of, let me be clear. Hopes, dreams, aspirations, we are all people" it was idiotspeak . She humiliated herself in that full unedited interview.
Freedom of speech for the press does not mean manipulating footage to make a Presidential canidate’s response to a question look less idiotic. It’s not bullying to hold CBS accountable. This wasn’t a red carpet interview of an actress for E! It was an interview held right before the election for the leader of the free world. If he hadn’t sued, we wouldn’t know. That alone justifies the lawsuit.
They also have always released the full unedited transcripts of all their other interviews but didn't in Harris's case, that to me proves ill intent. If they were editing for time like they always do they would have included the full transcript on their website.
CBS aired a different answer in their interview preview from the actual edited interview they aired. If they hadn't had made that mistake, none of this would have happened. It made everyone suspicious. It's their fault and the only way to fix it was to release the unedited interview.
No, they didn't. I was one of the people calling for the full interview. I understood the reason for the snippet, but I wanted the whole thing because I like to be informed as much as possible.
If CBS had done this to help Trump, Cenk would be ranting at the top of his lungs about how. This was a typical TYT ‘Rules for thee but not for Me’ scenario.
Ana doesn't seem to realise that most people understand why stuff is edited for TV (time, etc). People are annoyed at how it was edited. It was deliberately edited in a way to make her look stronger than she actually was. Because watching that unedited interview, she came across as absolutely lost and defeated. This is making these media companies accountable. I agree with it. I'm probably more on the conservative side of the aisle but I do enjoy listening to Cenk and Ana and agree with them on many topics. But they are dead wrong on this one.
you are both biased. when you evaluate something, the first think that you take into account is the intention. there are other parts that the CBS didn't use and they are not good for Harris
TYT, have some dignity and admit that you think Kamala is a charlatan and is mediocre. Instead of attacking your political-rivals, why not use your platform to push for the democratic party to be more democratic in electing your presidential picks, and at least have some candidates that are smarter and intelligible than Kamala? Cut the bullshit and stop acting as if you don’t believe she is stupid.
The network may have been receiving funds from USAID to edit the interview to make Harris look less clumsy. The press has always seemed ready, even eager to favor Democrats.
To all of the Trumpers posting comments about Kamala Harris and the CBS interview please tell me what they actually did that was wrong. The full interview was broadcasted on 60 minutes and a condensed version was aired on Face the Nation. Now if you are so angry about that then what about Foxnews definitely editing out Trump's answers during his interview in a Barbershop to make him look better.
This was a candidate for the united state of America anything she says is (VERY VERY)important. The purpose of the interview is for the people to see the unedited version of their speech no media should be helping them seem smarter or less of if you can't see that then you will continuing to be led like sheep!!!!
Did you actually watch the interview. The part that people say is edited really wasn't. Kamala's answer was already on the vid. Trump didn't even do an interview.
You’re deliberately misleading your viewers with your portrayal of what happened. CBS didn’t edit down Harris’ answer for clarity or time; they literally replaced her original answer with a different one because her actual answer was nonsensical word salad. There’s a difference between editing down a long answer and COMPLETELY REPLACING IT WITH A DIFFERENT ONE.
No because ,the news are aloud to play clips of any information pertaining to news topic,that's why so many other podcasts from Rogan to piers Morgan and others have played it multiple times
@carlmiller757 it would be protected by the fair use doctrine. TYT is "media" so it would be even easier for them to use it without asking for permission than it would be for me or you.
What is the point of this? We're mad that they released the unedited full video? This should of been done from the start. They should all release these videos unedited. Otherwise it can be framed any other way they'd like. Man this channel is getting old...
I didn’t watch the original interview but I watched the full interview and her response about illegal migration is what needed editing, she sounded like a blithering idiot
They didn’t simply edit down. They changed the answer she gave to one question with a response she gave to a different question. That is tampering. Plain and simple.
Anything but self reflection, anything but giving the voters what they want. It’s so obvious and in your face but it can’t be that there was anything wrong with her campaign
The question to ask and be honest about, if Trump fumbled answers like she did do you think they would favorably edit them down or publish the full answers to make him look bad?
The editing clearly didn't make much difference. What is noticeable is how much political noise there is over this editing, but virtual silence on the serious editing Fox did to protect Trump. Why is that?
@@surge3158 If you aren't aware of the significant editing Fox was doing on Trump interviews you are clearly not watching balanced news. Try googling 'Fox news Trump Epstein editing', that would be a start.
@@st4331 I'm not watching any news, it's all bullshit. I see what people say and the actions that follow. CNN, Fox, MSNBC and the like can all go to hell as far as I'm concerned
Bad take. “Bad precedent” is the verbiage being used repeatedly here, but the true “bad precedent” is presenting one of the nominees for POTUS in an edited format to make them seem more intelligent & concise than they actually are. Editing their answers, whether it’s the intention or not, is skewing viewer’s opinions of the candidate.
Cenk, don't inclue Joe Rogan in your examples. He does not do edited interviews. And, btw, 60 minutes could release every interview they do in its' entirety using the web. Frontline does it. It might save them this problem in the future.
You may be correct that this was all motivated by corporate interests et al, but there is no questions that CBS absolutely edited the interview with motive to make Harris appear more coherent/competent than she was. You can't just go off the transcript...the full video put on full display her lack of confidence and substance in answering even the most basic questions.
This was such a well-researched analysis! The connection between CBS’s compliance and the Paramount-SkyDance merger was something I hadn’t considered. Thank you for shedding light on the bigger picture behind these media decisions!
If 60 minutes was interviewing Trump they would never edited the parts that make him look bad I was never a big fan of Donald Trump but the media does take a lot of his clips out of context
Lmao to defend this is crazy smh. You know what I’ll happily admit they didn’t do anything wrong and this happens all the time when you admit that if this was the other way around and Trump did this in an interview somehow there would be no edited or I’m sorry “condensed” version they would mysteriously have all the time in the world to show his entire answer! The double standard here is RIDICULOUS and you know it!
The difference is you read it well but watching her answer is the point the long winded answer was clearly her answering with a talking point and when he followed up she was completely lost that is what they edited out I don't really care but to say there wasn't a clear difference is just lying, the point was when she is on script she still struggled but shows she had no ability answer the smallest push back
Why keep going on about this? It is important to show people how they can be manipulated by some clever editing. Not just this time, but inevitably, moving forward too.
Her second answer was NOT EDITED to be shorter!!! It was a completely different answer substituted from elsewhere in the interview! You might as well condone instructing AI to chop and change words and answers to suit your preferred candidate.
My God, I almost forgot how much word salad that woman served up.
@chrlpolk more then trump babbling about nothing
This is why she didn’t go on Joe Rogan
She could never have managed three hours, and especially not without editorial control.
@@init100exactly that’s why she went on Wiggy Stern instead of
@@justinball5068 prez Elon actually had a lot to do with that
She didn't go on Rogan because Rogan didn't want her on. He was coerced by Trump and Musk. The harris campaigned released info on this
@@infjintegrityvsnarcissism7295 you dumb fool. Rogan blocked her from comming on. Wake up. You are being lied too!!!
This is all the more reason why interviews should be done live.
Preach!
She wasnt a legit candidate
Worstest candidate evurrrr.
@@IAmAwsomeO1 nah that’s Donald. Putin’s puppet. Putin is setting up the NWO and once he gets the US divided and weakened enough, he’ll throw Donald under the bus and take over
The interview was presented as a one-on-one organic conversation. It's what 60 minutes interviews are known for. Pretending this was merely an efficiency edit is dishonest, especially when Kamala's ramblings were already an established component of her critique. I didn't vote for Trumpo, but this is political distortion at it's purest.
Well said !
To absolutely no one's surprise, CBS News comes across as PR firm for the DNC.
@@dewayneblue1834 and Fox, OAN, etc aren’t PR firms for Donald? Gtfoh 🙄
@@Goof.McDoofYour name suits you 😂
@ yours suits you better, you’re as intelligent as a drawing of a small bird
@@Goof.McDoof Weak response 😂 🤣
@@Goof.McDoof Try again soyjack
WHO is going to bother watching presidential candidate interviews if they have no idea if and how they've been post edited by the broadcaster?
(many) Democrat voters
@@daveisbrill that’s exactly the attitude Donald wants you to have. Flood the zone so regular people get tired and ignore it all, and so the left can’t keep up with everything he’s doing.
So, broadcasters expect to cut and paste answers to aid their preferred candidate and still be considered trustworthy.?
Just post the entire interview every time you interview a politician. Problem solved. See how easy that was.
Revoke CBS broadcasting licenses at this point. This is beyond shameful, it's bordering treasonous.
Why not? CBS did wrong it was a word salad
Her typical word salad responses turned out to be a full salad bar. No wonder she (and 'her team') wouldn't allow her on Joe Rogan without conditions.
Rogan is a dummy.
Actually, Rogan didn't want her on.
@@agentofchaos7456Rogan has stated multiple times he would have loved to have her on his show. All he wanted was no less than one hour of uninterrupted time with zero talking points. He said he wanted to get to know the person behind the candidate. She demanded 20 minutes and Rogan could only ask the questions laid out by her campaign.
@@snapdragon420 Well, that was revealed to be bullshit.
@@agentofchaos7456 according to who? Reddit? The man has stated that multiple times with multiple different guests including during the President Trump interview.
Yes, Trump is working this for his benefit but Cenk is missing the other point. Why did CBS withhold releasing the entire Harris interview when they've released full interviews in the past with other politicians. That's the reason this molehill turned into a mountain.
@@steelehere1 wrong! Thank God trump decided to come out of his beautiful life and put up with this crap. I'm sick of you on the left using emotion as an argument. First you try and claim to know what trump is thinking than you claim to know what he's going to do on that. Instead try and see that USAID resisted all past attempts for a congressional audit and Elon is doing an audit agency by agency to find waste,fruad,and abuse. He is backed by the president who told everyone that he was going to do a government audit if elected. again.
They didn't "edit the answer down"... they swapped it with her response to a different question... and it still sounded like word salad!
If CBS interviewed Trump and he gave a Kamala-esque bumbling word salad answer, they'd say "This makes him look like an idiot, leave it all in."
Kamala gives a bumbling word salad answer, CBS would say "guys, we have time constraints, commercials....let's cut it down for time purposes "
This is why she didn't do Rogan. No backup.
The worst presidential candidate in history.
Worst!!!
Absolute Worst!!
Let’s not go so hard on Biden. Honesty, I think Carter was worse.
The one in the WH now was and is the worst.
TYT LOGIC:
Your opponent cheats.
You still come out victorious.
You call out your opponent to expose cheating
TYT: "WHY DOES IT EVEN MATTTERRR"
Absolute brain dead take.
OMG you two just lost all credibility Anna i a SO disappointed in you! I watched the unedited vs the edited. They changed quite a bit. They made her look "better". I expect the "trump is a whiner" bit from Cenk, but from you we usually get the real deal.Did you watch the whole thing or just read the talking points Cenk prepared?
Second that.
She also reads Kamala's lines more confidently than how Kamala actually says the words herself.
Aka the one time Ana doesn't grift to appeal to you guys you start crying.
If birthing person doesnt say Kamala bad 24/7 you snowflakes have a meltdown. Yall are so pathetic. 😂
Another bad take from Ana. CBS should be held accountable because they completely changed her answer with another one from a different question. You guys need to do more research.
Another bad take of a Trump. What you just said doesnt make sense. Fox DOES THE SAME WITH REPUBLICANS. They edit! Is part of the process!
They just showed that what you are saying is absolutely false. They just didn't show the entire response which happens in editing all the time. But now you want the government to control free press. This is how democracy dies.
YES!
@@leeg1069 freee press? lol
legacy media is NOT free press
democracy dies when the institutions fall in line behind a political party and parrots talking points like the state run media it is. covid showed us that and now all of the "facts" are turning out to be wrong
There is only one truth. Not “your truth” but “the truth”. Just air it all. Simple.
Is this coming from the same group who was post screen shots of left wing politicians speeches when they raised their hands and tried to pretend like they were doing the n**i salute. How about you air those full speech ya hypocrite.
kamala has been reduced to a punchline!
This is exactly why she wasn't allowed to go on Rogan.
Hilarious how mad Cenk is for the audience seeing through his spin to save CBS lol
Clearly why she didn’t want to go on Rogan
"In terms of, in regards too, in the context of, let me be clear. Hopes, dreams, aspirations, we are all people" it was idiotspeak . She humiliated herself in that full unedited interview.
But Trump never sounds like an idiot, right?
@@TIG5574😂😂 cope harder there is no comparison here
@adimamusa1772 He's a wannbe dictator and already turning America into a circus. Everyone will be coping in a few months including you.
@@TIG5574did CBS edit his interview?
Freedom of speech for the press does not mean manipulating footage to make a Presidential canidate’s response to a question look less idiotic. It’s not bullying to hold CBS accountable. This wasn’t a red carpet interview of an actress for E! It was an interview held right before the election for the leader of the free world. If he hadn’t sued, we wouldn’t know. That alone justifies the lawsuit.
Exactly. It was outrageous. They changed it in plain sight, not even trying to hide what they did. An absolute joke.
They also have always released the full unedited transcripts of all their other interviews but didn't in Harris's case, that to me proves ill intent. If they were editing for time like they always do they would have included the full transcript on their website.
CBS aired a different answer in their interview preview from the actual edited interview they aired. If they hadn't had made that mistake, none of this would have happened. It made everyone suspicious. It's their fault and the only way to fix it was to release the unedited interview.
No, they didn't. I was one of the people calling for the full interview. I understood the reason for the snippet, but I wanted the whole thing because I like to be informed as much as possible.
@DRNT940 Yes, they did.
If CBS had done this to help Trump, Cenk would be ranting at the top of his lungs about how. This was a typical TYT ‘Rules for thee but not for Me’ scenario.
Had CBS done this to help Trump, Trump and his goons wouldn’t have launched their investigation in the first place.
The real question is why didn't they just release it months ago???
You know the answer.
Because they did nothing wrong and felt like they did nothing wrong but have recently been threatened to be taken off the air by Trump
It made Kamala look worse than she already did. Pretty simple. Can't let Americans see the truth.
Ana doesn't seem to realise that most people understand why stuff is edited for TV (time, etc). People are annoyed at how it was edited. It was deliberately edited in a way to make her look stronger than she actually was. Because watching that unedited interview, she came across as absolutely lost and defeated.
This is making these media companies accountable. I agree with it.
I'm probably more on the conservative side of the aisle but I do enjoy listening to Cenk and Ana and agree with them on many topics. But they are dead wrong on this one.
You’re fine when Fox News edits trumps BS though
@CG-bv4of I never said I was. Also, I'm not American. Also, you can see unedited interviews of Trump all over the Internet. They aren't hidden.
@@CG-bv4ofgive us a concrete example.
@@CG-bv4ofproof of trumps interviews being edited.
@@LoyalWilliamUKif you're not American then mind your own business.
Thank you, President Trump, for taking the time to expose the fake news
So Trumps the bad guy here?
Youve lost your mind.
Zactly
right? people are crazy
Or they're forced to appease the crazy blue haired people....
Kamala is so weird. I’m sorry, but there’s just something about her.
She’s not authentic.
@ She’s not authentic, and she’s apparently unaware of the fact that everyone sees it.
@@bengalpixie082It’s so much more than just that though
@ agreed.
I'm stunned that so many people refuse to just acknowledge this. She's awful.
Would you be upset if fox did that for trump?
They don't. That's the difference.
you are both biased. when you evaluate something, the first think that you take into account is the intention. there are other parts that the CBS didn't use and they are not good for Harris
This is A BIG DEAL, a very big deal
TYT, have some dignity and admit that you think Kamala is a charlatan and is mediocre. Instead of attacking your political-rivals, why not use your platform to push for the democratic party to be more democratic in electing your presidential picks, and at least have some candidates that are smarter and intelligible than Kamala? Cut the bullshit and stop acting as if you don’t believe she is stupid.
The network may have been receiving funds from USAID to edit the interview to make Harris look less clumsy. The press has always seemed ready, even eager to favor Democrats.
Harris is a leftwing puppet
Money talks
Kamala is so annoying
@@BadKid95US as well as any other democrat.
Regardless if it effected the outcome of the election or not, this is not good.
Trump just needed to call out that misbehavior from CBS so that it won't become a pattern..
To all of the Trumpers posting comments about Kamala Harris and the CBS interview please tell me what they actually did that was wrong. The full interview was broadcasted on 60 minutes and a condensed version was aired on Face the Nation.
Now if you are so angry about that then what about Foxnews definitely editing out Trump's answers during his interview in a Barbershop to make him look better.
BECAUSE IT IS CHEATING ANNA . If you think BRAZEN PREFERABLE EDITING IS OK it shows why Americans are DONE with liberals.
That didn't happen, but it does on Fox News.
@DRNT940 saying but but but fox news just makes you seem dumb.
@listenup7284 You watching Fox News makes you dumber and when you say you don't, you just watch others parroting the same horseshit.
Fox news has edited trump interviews just stop
Hearing Kamala speak for 5 minutes is enough to make any sane person vote Republican
This was a candidate for the united state of America anything she says is (VERY VERY)important. The purpose of the interview is for the people to see the unedited version of their speech no media should be helping them seem smarter or less of if you can't see that then you will continuing to be led like sheep!!!!
Did you actually watch the interview. The part that people say is edited really wasn't. Kamala's answer was already on the vid. Trump didn't even do an interview.
@@15jewjewtrump did tons of multiple hour interviews that are all unedited, it’s one of the reasons he won
@@seanmitchell5438 Even though the debate was unedited and he lost to Kamala?
@@seanmitchell5438 Are we gonna talk about the fox news interview where Donald Trump said he was less inclined to release the Epstein files.
You’re deliberately misleading your viewers with your portrayal of what happened.
CBS didn’t edit down Harris’ answer for clarity or time; they literally replaced her original answer with a different one because her actual answer was nonsensical word salad.
There’s a difference between editing down a long answer and COMPLETELY REPLACING IT WITH A DIFFERENT ONE.
Gee I wonder why you don't play the side by side that would counter your watered down version. You lose credibility doing this
It's called copyright laws. That's why they didn't.
No because ,the news are aloud to play clips of any information pertaining to news topic,that's why so many other podcasts from Rogan to piers Morgan and others have played it multiple times
@carlmiller757 it would be protected by the fair use doctrine. TYT is "media" so it would be even easier for them to use it without asking for permission than it would be for me or you.
You just proved that they took the answer from another question and put it in.
What are you talking about? They didn't switch any of her answers and the transcripts prove that.
You're one of those people who comments without watching the whole video.
We clearly dodged a huge bullet.
They're being dishonest that's why we care. You should care too if you care about journalist integrity.
The last thing this channel Cares about is the truth
I agree, Fox News needs some journalistic integrity. The dishonesty on that channel is terrible.
Why are you reading the transcripts in a calm, smooth voice when the video is available?? We know why, but I thought you were better than this...
As a conservative I’m not a fan of this. Let’s release all Fox interviews. We have to be consistent.
You're not welcome here
I think the difference is that CBS receives government funding.
@@TamunoOpuboCooksCookeyGam CBS doesn't get government funding. It's a private company.
@@TamunoOpuboCooksCookeyGam💯
You really think they would have edited it for Trump? No is the answer
What is the point of this? We're mad that they released the unedited full video? This should of been done from the start. They should all release these videos unedited. Otherwise it can be framed any other way they'd like. Man this channel is getting old...
I didn’t watch the original interview but I watched the full interview and her response about illegal migration is what needed editing, she sounded like a blithering idiot
She is a blithering idiot and the MSM should show that.
she IS a blithering idiot
The point of it was to show the media bias that's it.
They didn’t simply edit down. They changed the answer she gave to one question with a response she gave to a different question. That is tampering. Plain and simple.
Exactly I hope Trump put them and all crooked media out of buissness
Why is there so much debate about why Harris lost? Do you not have eyes?
So scared of competent women.
@ if Kamala Harris is your idea of a competent woman you have a very low opinion of women.
@@nikosvaultfeminist detected lol
Anything but self reflection, anything but giving the voters what they want. It’s so obvious and in your face but it can’t be that there was anything wrong with her campaign
The question to ask and be honest about, if Trump fumbled answers like she did do you think they would favorably edit them down or publish the full answers to make him look bad?
💯 this is the EXACT point that needs to be made.
No, they would edit it to make him sound even worse.
These interviews should be unedited.
Just because it didn't work doesn't mean what they did wasn't wrong!
You're making me feel like I'm drunk they literally changed a response the words were not the same
The editing clearly didn't make much difference. What is noticeable is how much political noise there is over this editing, but virtual silence on the serious editing Fox did to protect Trump. Why is that?
Good point!
@@st4331 classic CNN response, make the same claims but never actually point to any evidence. What are you talking about?
@@surge3158 If you aren't aware of the significant editing Fox was doing on Trump interviews you are clearly not watching balanced news. Try googling 'Fox news Trump Epstein editing', that would be a start.
@@st4331 I'm not watching any news, it's all bullshit. I see what people say and the actions that follow. CNN, Fox, MSNBC and the like can all go to hell as far as I'm concerned
America dodged a bullet. Could you imagine her being the president of the United States
It would have been so much better than the insanity going on right now.
No way. An empty suit forever.
Bad take. “Bad precedent” is the verbiage being used repeatedly here, but the true “bad precedent” is presenting one of the nominees for POTUS in an edited format to make them seem more intelligent & concise than they actually are. Editing their answers, whether it’s the intention or not, is skewing viewer’s opinions of the candidate.
They edit literally every interview they ever do
At the end of the day CBS cut the word salad to make her look better, so little sympathy
You just hate when the truth comes out don't you.
I care more about POLITICO getting paid 34.3 million by USAID
Make
American
Gullible
Again
Try doing some actual research.
OF COURSE you're still defending Kamala.... 🤦🏽♂️🤡 Thank you for proving on a daily basis why yall lost
You guys just lost some credibility with this crap. You guy are spinning it and you know it.
Cenk, don't inclue Joe Rogan in your examples. He does not do edited interviews. And, btw, 60 minutes could release every interview they do in its' entirety using the web. Frontline does it. It might save them this problem in the future.
10:30
Horrible logic, Ana. CBS could be putting thumbs on scales and still lose.
Ana losing credibility unfortunately. CBS clearly edited the interview to make KH look better. FAFO.
I would wager Trump has a bone to pick with political legacy media , wouldn’t you?
All one would need to do is look at the history of the past decade
Wait until they go after fox who ran fake town halls for trump AND they EDITED trump's nonsensical answers!!!
You may be correct that this was all motivated by corporate interests et al, but there is no questions that CBS absolutely edited the interview with motive to make Harris appear more coherent/competent than she was. You can't just go off the transcript...the full video put on full display her lack of confidence and substance in answering even the most basic questions.
😂They probably edited Kamala’s laugh out.
😂😂😂
Guess we got another case for Fox opinions, since they actually cut Trump's commentary
This was such a well-researched analysis! The connection between CBS’s compliance and the Paramount-SkyDance merger was something I hadn’t considered. Thank you for shedding light on the bigger picture behind these media decisions!
CBS was totally in the bag for Kamala Harris
Was trump edited like kamala?
He didn't do the 60 minutes interview.
Have you heard of Fox new????
The issue is that leading up to the interview, all attention was on whether Kamala can do interviews. Remember she kept avoiding hard interviews.
Hmmm why'd you leave out the part where she couldn't answer why she wants to be president 😭
😅😂😂😂that's the worst part!, it was like an answer from a 12 year old pageantry contender not leader of the most powerful nation
If 60 minutes was interviewing Trump they would never edited the parts that make him look bad I was never a big fan of Donald Trump but the media does take a lot of his clips out of context
This woman may have been problematic anyway
Did they edit any of Trump's answers from his interview?
Fox edited Trump lots of times to protect him
@@st4331 Exactly. This is such a non-story. Trump is the world's worst sore winner.
@@Salmagundiii winner indeed
Which interview? Unlike Harris, he did far more than 3. Much like he's done more interviews since taking office than oatmeal brain did in 4 years.
Interviews? The dude rambles on and does his same old rally routine
Ain't no fun when the rabbit got the gun. 😅
Rather than read the q&a Ana, why don't you play the actual video. Reducing a 175+ word answer down to 22 words is not editing, it's altering.
Ex pdf CEO of CBS Leslie Moonves on Donald Trump: “It May Not Be Good for America, but It’s Damn Good for CBS”. That was during Trump's 1st run.
Lmao to defend this is crazy smh. You know what I’ll happily admit they didn’t do anything wrong and this happens all the time when you admit that if this was the other way around and Trump did this in an interview somehow there would be no edited or I’m sorry “condensed” version they would mysteriously have all the time in the world to show his entire answer! The double standard here is RIDICULOUS and you know it!
The difference is you read it well but watching her answer is the point the long winded answer was clearly her answering with a talking point and when he followed up she was completely lost that is what they edited out I don't really care but to say there wasn't a clear difference is just lying, the point was when she is on script she still struggled but shows she had no ability answer the smallest push back
Your so bias it ain't even funny
Why keep going on about this? It is important to show people how they can be manipulated by some clever editing. Not just this time, but inevitably, moving forward too.
Tyt really losing me two days I a row just terrible takes
You can’t be actually defending them
They should be canceled and fired that's why!
Oh give me a break Anna.....your better than this spinning news for CBS
How about companies always just have a link to unedited content? Problem-o solved
This was a horrible take Cenk.
Her second answer was NOT EDITED to be shorter!!!
It was a completely different answer substituted from elsewhere in the interview! You might as well condone instructing AI to chop and change words and answers to suit your preferred candidate.
Ana is becoming my best commentator
Even as a Conservative, i want the full story and she delivers