Based on the information processing model, where does the following fit in with the schema theory? Recall Schema Recognition Schema Parameters Long-term memory Short-term or working memory Encoding process Retrieval process
I have a question: Information processing model has three main stages. Show how a teacher can apply the three stages in the information processing model to enhance learners understanding.
nicely done but then you seemed to have confused me a little. if you said that it takes encoding to transfer information from the STM to the LTM, how then about Elaborative rehearsal???
I really enjoyed this video, but can u make indonesian subtitle? because this video is recommend by my teacher, so many myfriends do not understand what theory u say. thank u :)
It's surprising that you would use the example of driving a car while talking on your cellphone, given that that is illegal in a lot of places precisely because you can't concentrate on both properly.
Thank you for watching. The example was explaining how you can perform an auditory and visual task at the same time much easier than two auditory tasks or two visual tasks. It was not as much commenting on the safety of talking on the phone and driving in itself. Visual and auditory attention are processed in different areas of the brain. As a result - you can only take up capacity for one visual or auditory task rather than two. But you do have capacity to do an auditory and visual task at the same time. For example, its a lot harder to text and drive than it is to talk on the phone and drive because texting and driving are both visual tasks. Talking on the phone is an auditory tasks and driving is a visual task (non-competing). As a result you are more likely to get in a wreck if you are texting versus being on the phone while driving. I hope that this example makes sense.
I agree. 'Having a conversation with a passenger' would have been a better example (and is legal everywhere as far as I know). It's too easy to misconstrue from the given example that phones are safe to use whilst driving, which they are not, even though the main dangers do not relate to talking on the phone per se, but concern holding the device and using the keypad. Having said that, there is evidence that even hands-free phone use impacts driving ability, because visual and auditory channels are not completely independent.
@@KingMrColin Please tell me how hands free driving and 'Having a conversation with a passenger' are different. With your logic, you shouldn't talk to your passenger because talking hands free "impacts" driving. If I take a phone call completely hands free with my voice, that is no different than talking to the passenger. Also it's not his job to point out that texting and driving is not safe, this man provides us with a very good video about information processing and your takeaway is, he should've said 'passenger' instead of 'phone call' because apparently the two are vastly different.
Love your videos but if I can give you some feedback on your website: it is not good. It's covered with ads which makes it difficult to navigate on it, some tests don't work and the filtering part is also quite messy.
Outdated and incorrect terminology/information. Even harmful information that asserts we CAN focus on driving and talking at the same time. We can't. That's why it's illegal in my country. You should take this down and upload a correct version. If you're a student, please find another source of information. This is scientifically inaccurate.
That’s not at all the same thing in the sense of cognitive experiment. It means two separate processing slave systems don’t interfere with each other or with minimal effect. Talking and driving is just a real-life example
@@yanchan2839 I'm literally a current psychology student in university and this is an EXACT study we went over in class. So yes, it is the same. If 'real life examples' don't count, then what DOES? Only closed lab studies? Real life isn't real?? My dude. You can try to dress your reply with bullshit purple prose all you like, it doesn't make you any less wrong. Professional, clinical psychologists went over this EXACT thing with us. If I'm going to believe anybody, it's them and the repeatable clinical studies, not some dude on the internet trying to sound smart and failing miserably.
@@pokealjaAs a psy student, you should probably understand the difference between clinical studies/behavioural experiments and cognitive models. Your claims dont make decades of studies on how the slave systems dont interfere with each other less "believable". PLUS, this is a tutorial video explaining WM in simpler words -- some random guy (who has a degree already in psychology & cognitive science )
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
good stuff, love the visual graphic to help with retaining it....much better then talking into the camera.
Thank you. This helps me alot. I hardly understand this topic given the lack of information in my module.
thank you so much. you are my lecturer from now on.
Well detailed information and well explained, thank you Sir!
Thank youu! You cover the topics I need!! You are so helpful
Thank you for watching!!!
Thank you. I was taking a practice test while listening to this and had to watch it again because of selective listening.
2:53 i am writing a paper on this theory in the library at this moment lol
Ive had this since I can remember. Theory should be used. He pretty much nails it. I struggle everyday.
Excellent explanation! Thank you.
This helped me a lot! Thank you!!
Thank you for this information and well explain
Excellent explanation!
Based on the information processing model, where does the following fit in with the schema theory?
Recall Schema
Recognition Schema
Parameters
Long-term memory
Short-term or working memory
Encoding process
Retrieval process
Very helpful thank you!!
Wonderful session
Thanks, super helpful!
Hi Thanks 🙏🏼 needed to better understand this theory for my class tonight.
Informative video, I enjoyed it!
Thank you so much, this was so helpful!
Just can say well done 👍🙏
Thank you! It was extremely descriptive video with images :)
Well explained
Thank you so much. It was a great explanation.
Thank you so much!!🙏🏻💛💛🇧🇷
thank you sir! 😊
pwede tagalog naman nahihirapan ako ahahahahahaha charot well detailed tnks
Think you i will get an
A at my test
I have a question: Information processing model has three main stages. Show how a teacher can apply the three stages in the information processing model to enhance learners understanding.
Thank you! :)
nicely done but then you seemed to have confused me a little. if you said that it takes encoding to transfer information from the STM to the LTM, how then about Elaborative rehearsal???
Thanks!
Thanks for watching!
Thank you for watching!
Thanks
you got any sources for this
I really enjoyed this video, but can u make indonesian subtitle? because this video is recommend by my teacher, so many myfriends do not understand what theory u say. thank u :)
I’m not sure how to do that, but I can try to check it out.
4:20
It's surprising that you would use the example of driving a car while talking on your cellphone, given that that is illegal in a lot of places precisely because you can't concentrate on both properly.
Thank you for watching. The example was explaining how you can perform an auditory and visual task at the same time much easier than two auditory tasks or two visual tasks. It was not as much commenting on the safety of talking on the phone and driving in itself. Visual and auditory attention are processed in different areas of the brain. As a result - you can only take up capacity for one visual or auditory task rather than two. But you do have capacity to do an auditory and visual task at the same time. For example, its a lot harder to text and drive than it is to talk on the phone and drive because texting and driving are both visual tasks. Talking on the phone is an auditory tasks and driving is a visual task (non-competing). As a result you are more likely to get in a wreck if you are texting versus being on the phone while driving. I hope that this example makes sense.
I agree. 'Having a conversation with a passenger' would have been a better example (and is legal everywhere as far as I know). It's too easy to misconstrue from the given example that phones are safe to use whilst driving, which they are not, even though the main dangers do not relate to talking on the phone per se, but concern holding the device and using the keypad. Having said that, there is evidence that even hands-free phone use impacts driving ability, because visual and auditory channels are not completely independent.
@@KingMrColin wow you guys really are little babies.
It not that deep sis.
@@KingMrColin Please tell me how hands free driving and 'Having a conversation with a passenger' are different. With your logic, you shouldn't talk to your passenger because talking hands free "impacts" driving. If I take a phone call completely hands free with my voice, that is no different than talking to the passenger. Also it's not his job to point out that texting and driving is not safe, this man provides us with a very good video about information processing and your takeaway is, he should've said 'passenger' instead of 'phone call' because apparently the two are vastly different.
Love your videos but if I can give you some feedback on your website: it is not good. It's covered with ads which makes it difficult to navigate on it, some tests don't work and the filtering part is also quite messy.
Well done! Maybe step up the clarity of the audio, the quality is not up to the standard of the content.
What about people with learning disability
Learning disabilities or Select Learning Disorders are not explained specifically by this model.
Excuse me, what editor did you use please. I'd enjoy the animation💓 and the way you explain it.
That’s what he used
Pog
Is that your own theory?
When you watch inside out..
What??
B.M.H.S wyaa😂
Outdated and incorrect terminology/information. Even harmful information that asserts we CAN focus on driving and talking at the same time. We can't. That's why it's illegal in my country. You should take this down and upload a correct version. If you're a student, please find another source of information. This is scientifically inaccurate.
That’s not at all the same thing in the sense of cognitive experiment. It means two separate processing slave systems don’t interfere with each other or with minimal effect. Talking and driving is just a real-life example
@@yanchan2839 I'm literally a current psychology student in university and this is an EXACT study we went over in class. So yes, it is the same. If 'real life examples' don't count, then what DOES? Only closed lab studies? Real life isn't real?? My dude. You can try to dress your reply with bullshit purple prose all you like, it doesn't make you any less wrong. Professional, clinical psychologists went over this EXACT thing with us. If I'm going to believe anybody, it's them and the repeatable clinical studies, not some dude on the internet trying to sound smart and failing miserably.
@@pokealjaAs a psy student, you should probably understand the difference between clinical studies/behavioural experiments and cognitive models. Your claims dont make decades of studies on how the slave systems dont interfere with each other less "believable". PLUS, this is a tutorial video explaining WM in simpler words -- some random guy (who has a degree already in psychology & cognitive science )
Thanks!
Thanks