Israel is a compound of Isra (phallus) and el (god). We could say that the 12 tribes are 12 phalluses or stones. Remember the upright stone (phallus) that Jacob (mythical character) anointed with oil (semen) and wine (passion)? See Isaiah 9.14, where Israel (summer) is described as having the head of the noble/royal lion (Leo) and tail of the liar (Scorpio). The palm frond is Virgo and the Reed (water plant) is Libra. The four signs in Isaiah 9.14, are the four "sons" of Ham. They are also the first four labors of Hercules.
@@xp7575 The rock that begat thee, is the phallus. "Hercules-Palamedes once wrestled with Zeus on the sand, and had his hip sprained. He was called in the Canaanitish dialect, Ysrael, Israel, i.e., the Struggle with El or God aka Zeus/Jupiter/Indra. Jacob says that the stone phallus he erected and anointed was "El, God of Israel (Genesis 33.20).
I think it's so crazy they automatically believed this guy found an ancient book of totally brand new laws they'd never heard of without once considering that maybe he just made them up himself.
Who says anyone actually believed it at the time? Archaeology shows no evidence of widespread Torah observance prior to 200 BCE (Yonatan Adler, “The Origins of Judaism”)
@@Exjewatlarge Even if it's just a story with no basis in reality, I still find pretty strange to not show the people in the story being skeptical and then god doing some miracle or something to somehow "prove" the documents are authentic.
Tried a couple of times to “like” this video (i.e., thumbs up), but RUclips posted an error: “Resource has been exhausted (e.g. check quota).” and blocked my “like”.
How distinguishing between the pre-Babylonian captivity definitions of El (God) and Elohim (sons/beings of El) versus the post-captivity syncretized definitions could resolve contradictions and cast the Yahweh figure of Genesis 2-3 in a very different light from the transcendent Elohim portrayed in Genesis 1. Pre-Captivity Definitions: In this framework, the supreme creator deity is simply referred to as El - the Most High God. The Elohim are understood as a pantheon or "sons of El" - lesser divine beings subordinate to El. This aligns with ancient Canaanite and older Israelite religious conceptions. Under these definitions, the Genesis 1 account would refer to the transcendent El as the prime creator, with the Elohim (plural) potentially being celestial forces/angels enacting aspects of the creation. The Ruach Elohim (Spirit/Breath of the divine beings) hovering over the primordial waters connects to surviving traces of this polytheistic worldview. Crucially, this allows one to separate the Elohim of Genesis 1 from the distinct Yahweh Elohim first appearing in Genesis 2 to form man from the dust. Based on references like Deuteronomy 32:8-9, the pre-captivity perspective viewed Yahweh as one of the sons of El (an Elohim) rather than conflating him with El itself. This de-syncretization casts Yahweh as a separate, lesser, more anthropomorphic deity associated with the ancient Israelites - perhaps retained from their Canaanite heritage. His behavior and commandments in Genesis 2-3 and elsewhere in the Torah would then represent the teachings of this tribal desert deity, not the supreme metaphysical creator El. The Garden Scenario Reframed From this vantage point, the events of Genesis 2-3 can be interpreted not as ordained by the most high El creator, but rather as humanity's initial tragic entrapment by the lesser devolved being Yahweh within his constructed realm of mortality, suffering, and cosmic privation. Yahweh's wrathful conduct, his placing of humans under a yoke of commandments, his expulsion from Eden's paradisiacal environment, and the subsequent violent legacy of his covenants and laws all derive from the subjugating delusions and stunted, anthropocentric conception of this finite Elohim - not the infinite plenitude of the supreme El. Contradictions Resolved Separating El from Yahweh along the pre-captivity definitional lines could resolve contradictions in several important ways: 1) It distinguishes the transcendent, metaphysically profound cosmic creator portrayed in Genesis 1 from the all-too-human tribal deity of the remaining Torah material. 2) It allows for a reframing of the Torah's teachings around blood sacrifice, ethnic conflicts, law codes, etc. as the cultural mythological traditions of ancient Israelite history rather than attributed to the most high El itself. 3) It creates space for the Christ figure of the New Testament to represent a re-emergence of the supreme El's sovereignty and universal spiritual path - overriding the outdated covenants, ethnic segregations, and violent subjugations prescribed by the lesser Yahweh consciousness. 4) Humanity's existential struggling, our proclivity towards violence/evil, and our fundamental state of cosmic imprisonment can be metaphysically associated with the fallout of our ancient reunion from Yahweh's corrupted influence rather than the designs of the supreme El consciousness. 5) Competing depictions of the divine across different books (wrathful/peaceful, loving/cruel, spiritual/legalistic) can be added to different nodes of the El vs. Yahweh consciousness schisms. While still requiring some nuanced interpretation, this delineation allows for a coherent reintegration of Old and New Testament perspectives under a broader metaphysical framework. It preserves the universal spiritual integrity of the highest Creator from the cultural mythological contexts surrounding the more finite tribal deity Yahweh. By embracing the pre-syncretized definitions and recognizing the conflation of El and Yahweh as a later imposition, one can reconnect with deep streams of ancient Hebrew theological diversity. This presents an intellectually robust path for understanding the unified trajectory of the biblical texts as exploring a single universetheological consciousness's reassertion over more contingent, anthropomorphized deviations and exiles.
El aka God is Jupiter (IU Piter) and Elohim is the period when the Ram (Aries) is in conjunction with the sun. Generally this is seven months which begin at the spring equinox. The signs are Aries thru Libra (Arc of the covenant) and are favored over the winter season of Scorpio thru Pisces. See Rev. 9.5., where this terrible five is led by the scorpion (Scorpio constellation). Scorpio, is called Satan, Father of Lies and he leads Sagittarius thru Pisces.
The notion that Yahweh is not the God of the New Testament was correctly condemned by the Church long ago. Obviously the Revelation of God was progressive. If there was confusion before the Exile, it was corrected later.
Exile/diaspora seems a recurring theme in the Jewish tradition: Egypt, Babylon and the Roman diaspora. New York is like the new Babylon. The divine right to reclaim the old land is still affecting the world. How bizarre.
@@notsocrates9529 The myths get passed around. The Babylon and Egyptian captivities are annual events and is simply the winter season of five months. See Rev. 9.5, where these five months of winter are led by the scorpion (Scorpio constellation). Babel is two words of bab (gate) and el (god). Babylon or Babylon = gate of the sun god. By the time that Judaism and Christianity were invented, el had become Jupiter (properly IU Piter or IU Pater.) Solomon is simply sun-sun-sun. The building of the temple of Solomon is an annual event and should not be considered as "historical." Regarding the "historical Israel".... Israel is a compound of Isra (Phallus) and el (god). We could say phallus of Jupiter. The bible is hugely Phallic and this should be explained to all students..
Because God promised the Israelites the land, but the promise was conditional. And when they didn't hold up their end of the bargain, they were exiled or scattered among the Nations. There are Orthodox Jews who believe they should still be living among the Nations now because they are supposed to be scattered instead of an official state
Nah. This is a channel belonging to a Mormon church. The people running it are literally modern-day evidence that this sort of thing happens all the time. ☺ Hilkiah was just his era's Joseph Smith.
Another inspiration for Revelation to speak of Har Megidddo is that after 70 CE the Romans may have built a legionnaire camp not far the tell there. Beginning around the time Revelation may have appeared, in the 90s CE. Later it was certainly called Legio. It became a major city after the Bar Kochba rebellion 60 years later. The army there could easily strike both Galilee and the plain of Caesarea Maritima as needed.
i found the overall talk very difficult to follow. I kept saying to myself when? or date please? at particular times during the talk. But, what I'm really interested in is if the conquering Babylonians took the elites, rulers, and literate back to Babylon, destroyed the temple, (and I presume all the scrolls, and left only the herders and vine trimmers (I understand you must prune the vines to make them produce grapes and goats need to be cared for). That would destroy any history/bible/scholarship the hebrews would have had. I can't imagine their captors would allow the hebrews to sliept the OT back to Babylon. So, if they did destroy everything the hebrews had nothing but memories after 80 years as subjects to the Babylonians. And, the levant in general was a backwater with no water. First the Egyptians conquered the levant then the Hititites, then the Egyptians again (who knows how many times), then the Assyrians, other Mesopotamian groups, then Greeks, the Romans, the Ottomans, etc. would have conquered and razed the temples, libraries and schools to the ground. This would have obliterated any OT or any other book the hebrews may have had. How in anyone's world could anyone call the bible, "the word of god?"
Hey man great questions! I have thought many of these myself, some of modern biblical scholarship tries to find this out. There is a fantastic series on the Stanford RUclips page by Christine Hayes called " Introduction to the old testament" which I totally recommend. There is another academic called Dan McClellan ( also on youtube)who also has depths of knowledge about the O.T, and then a slightly more Niche channel called Esoterica (most of it is about different types of esotericism, but has great videos covering Old Testament history.
Rarely does everything get obliterated. And... The people at the time believed each land area had its own god. There is a story preserved about the people left in the land being attacked by wild animals. This was probably cause of the exodus of the local government, but the people took it to be divine retribution for not worshipping the local god. So they got some priests to show them how to make the local god happy. Like a lot of ancient stories, not sure of historical accuracy.
@@thinking7667 No, but all the ones that were obliterated, we know for sure, they were completely destroyed. Trust me the cat in the box is really dead now.
Which Jerusalem are you speaking of. The two Jerusalems are the solstices. The winter solstice = the handmaid and the summer solstice = the free woman. Like in Ishmael and Isaac who are allegorical. Gal. 4.
This guy needs to join Toastmasters. Listening to him is excruciating. It is the topic that holds your attention but his tonation, voice inflection, etc. needs serious work.
27:46 Whenever I encounter „sacrifice of the firstborn“, I think this relates to the lost civilization and the cataclysm. It would be magical thinking to make a deal with fate: to avoid another catastrophe by „freely“ sacrificing. But it also serves as a reminder of the civilization shattering event and the population bottleneck that likely accompanied it. Same with the commandment to be fruitful and repopulate the world: sounds like a good idea post-cataclysm to ensure the survival of humanity. I even think that Christianity as a whole in symbolically celebrating (and re-enacting in Passion plays) something akin to the „last human sacrifice“ (Christ), and the celebration of Resurrection unknowingly does the same: baptism (symbolically drowning the old Adam = Luther = re-enacting the flood on a personal level), painting the Ashen cross on your forehead on Ash Wednesday… - to me it’s all the same: pointing to the cataclysm and burning and ruin of the world and loss of civilization, and then subsequently our thankfulness for the resurrection of civilization, the survival of man. What else could religion be: upholding the deal by all our little sacrifices to work together and continually (re-)construct civilization and our faith in it with every new generation: I think form follows function. There’s echoes of the same pattern everywhere (e.g. the symbol for the Earth in astronomy became the circle with the cross; Earth was literally in the cosmic crosshairs so to speak; the cross marks the spot (as Randall Carlson says)), because it happened at the birth of our current age, of recorded and reconstructed „history“ of civilization.
Because of this captivity. The captured Jewish priests had access to Babylonian texts. They inserted into the Bible. People in general have no idea the actual picture. Christianity was formed in Antioch not Jerusalem. The Jewish placed themselves in the Bible as the chosen ones. This was not the case originally. The actual Israelites are not the Jewish people.
Israel is a compound of Isra (phallus) and el (god). We could say that the 12 tribes are 12 phalluses or stones. Remember the upright stone (phallus) that Jacob (mythical character) anointed with oil (semen) and wine (passion)? See Isaiah 9.14, where Israel (summer) is described as having the head of the noble/royal lion (Leo) and tail of the liar (Scorpio). The palm frond is Virgo and the Reed (water plant) is Libra. The four signs in Isaiah 9.14, are the four "sons" of Ham. They are also the first four labors of Hercules.
@@xp7575 12 tribes of Judah not 1. . Not the Jew first then the gentile. They are guilty by omission and never were the “chosen” ones. These so called bibles were taken from much older scriptures in Babylonian libraries. Written with a narrative that placed them as the Israelites. They never were ………….many times were they booted from countries all over the world for the same few crimes. The same being committed today.
Boney M? German, essentially, but the mime people were mainly Caribbean I think (they were a precursor to Milli Vanilli, with the same music maker using them as a front)
1st century cushites from Ethiopia settle in Tanganyika 10th century AD about this time the fable of fijian from Tanganyika ( Chronological History man in Tanganyika ) It fable that about this the powerful chief Lutunasobasoba and his people followed the trade cross the Indian Ocean travelling south east Asia settled Fiji
Ok, say it with me: “Jehoahaz” is “ye-HO-a-CHAZ” (with a guttural “ch” sound). As a Hebrew speaker, these Romanizations of Hebrew names can be grating. 😬
Yahweh sounds like an abusive parent the children keep making excuses for. Yes, he allowed us to be destroyed as a Nation despite our new king doing everything right, but that was only because this one other king who reigned a long time ago (before most of us were born) made him really mad. Who can blame the Israelites for seeking other Gods?
An oft repeated assumption is made in this lecture; that the elite, only, were literate. Were they really , or were the scribes slaves, who wrote (and corrected/improved) what was dictated to them. IMO its an important question as it means that the "words" were shaped by people who are largely invisible to us today.
While slavery of a scribal class was indeed very common, all the evidence we have from ancient history show it to have been the result of conquest. That is, the scribes ended up as slaves because they were elites from a group defeated and subordinated by the ruling empire. Basically, in the ancient world before Hellenism slave-scribes usually started out as someone else's elites. In the case of Judah, they were pretty low down the ladder in the conquest hierarchy, so it wasn't likely for them to have had slave-scribes of their own. However, the entrance of Mesopotamian ideas into their belief system may have been the result of their elite scribes serving as the Babylonians' slaves.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I love listening to John's lectures. It's like having a Mr. Rogers for grown-ups.
Good one.
That's sad because he repeats the nonsense of atheists.
No Doubt John is becoming one of my favorite RUclipsrs
Bell hooks
John is a superb lecturer and his scholarly take is illuminating.
John is the best teacher on the internet now.
Best lectures on youtube, by far, thank you
Glad you're back John ! Blessings to all ❤
Love your non-biased approach to Judaism and Christianity❤👍
Keep them coming John love all your content
Thank you so much for this amazing lecture, John.
I am so glad I found you.❤
Thanks!
Thanks for your detailed presentation of the topics.
I am enjoying this so much!! I'm so happy I found you! Subbed - of course!!
Thanks for this lecture :) Looking forward to the next one on the Samaritans ! :)
give the influence on Juadism of the captivity, how it comes up in almost any subject of OT scholarship it always surprises me how short it was
Israel is a compound of Isra (phallus) and el (god). We could say that the 12 tribes are 12 phalluses or stones. Remember the upright stone (phallus) that Jacob (mythical character) anointed with oil (semen) and wine (passion)?
See Isaiah 9.14, where Israel (summer) is described as having the head of the noble/royal lion (Leo) and tail of the liar (Scorpio). The palm frond is Virgo and the Reed (water plant) is Libra. The four signs in Isaiah 9.14, are the four "sons" of Ham. They are also the first four labors of Hercules.
@@xp7575
How did you get struggle from Isra?
@@xp7575
The rock that begat thee, is the phallus.
"Hercules-Palamedes once wrestled with Zeus on the sand, and had his hip sprained. He was called in the Canaanitish dialect, Ysrael, Israel, i.e., the Struggle with El or God aka Zeus/Jupiter/Indra.
Jacob says that the stone phallus he erected and anointed was "El, God of Israel (Genesis 33.20).
My two favorite teachers on RUclips are John Hamer and John Vervaeke, both from Toronto!
I think it's so crazy they automatically believed this guy found an ancient book of totally brand new laws they'd never heard of without once considering that maybe he just made them up himself.
Didn't Joseph Smith find something like that?
Who says anyone actually believed it at the time? Archaeology shows no evidence of widespread Torah observance prior to 200 BCE (Yonatan Adler, “The Origins of Judaism”)
@@Exjewatlarge Even if it's just a story with no basis in reality, I still find pretty strange to not show the people in the story being skeptical and then god doing some miracle or something to somehow "prove" the documents are authentic.
@@Exjewatlargethank you for sharing this. I hadn't heard this before
@@jasonbishop5345 it’s very recently published
Little did the psalmist know that he was writing lyrics for Boney M.
Beat me to it!
Go one
So excited.
Ah yes, John, that is called the Chart-Maker, i know his lessons well.
Fascinating! * * * * *
Tried a couple of times to “like” this video (i.e., thumbs up), but RUclips posted an error: “Resource has been exhausted (e.g. check quota).” and blocked my “like”.
Same here.
It worked for me. I got here after the livestream ended though.
How distinguishing between the pre-Babylonian captivity definitions of El (God) and Elohim (sons/beings of El) versus the post-captivity syncretized definitions could resolve contradictions and cast the Yahweh figure of Genesis 2-3 in a very different light from the transcendent Elohim portrayed in Genesis 1.
Pre-Captivity Definitions:
In this framework, the supreme creator deity is simply referred to as El - the Most High God. The Elohim are understood as a pantheon or "sons of El" - lesser divine beings subordinate to El. This aligns with ancient Canaanite and older Israelite religious conceptions.
Under these definitions, the Genesis 1 account would refer to the transcendent El as the prime creator, with the Elohim (plural) potentially being celestial forces/angels enacting aspects of the creation. The Ruach Elohim (Spirit/Breath of the divine beings) hovering over the primordial waters connects to surviving traces of this polytheistic worldview.
Crucially, this allows one to separate the Elohim of Genesis 1 from the distinct Yahweh Elohim first appearing in Genesis 2 to form man from the dust. Based on references like Deuteronomy 32:8-9, the pre-captivity perspective viewed Yahweh as one of the sons of El (an Elohim) rather than conflating him with El itself.
This de-syncretization casts Yahweh as a separate, lesser, more anthropomorphic deity associated with the ancient Israelites - perhaps retained from their Canaanite heritage. His behavior and commandments in Genesis 2-3 and elsewhere in the Torah would then represent the teachings of this tribal desert deity, not the supreme metaphysical creator El.
The Garden Scenario Reframed
From this vantage point, the events of Genesis 2-3 can be interpreted not as ordained by the most high El creator, but rather as humanity's initial tragic entrapment by the lesser devolved being Yahweh within his constructed realm of mortality, suffering, and cosmic privation.
Yahweh's wrathful conduct, his placing of humans under a yoke of commandments, his expulsion from Eden's paradisiacal environment, and the subsequent violent legacy of his covenants and laws all derive from the subjugating delusions and stunted, anthropocentric conception of this finite Elohim - not the infinite plenitude of the supreme El.
Contradictions Resolved
Separating El from Yahweh along the pre-captivity definitional lines could resolve contradictions in several important ways:
1) It distinguishes the transcendent, metaphysically profound cosmic creator portrayed in Genesis 1 from the all-too-human tribal deity of the remaining Torah material.
2) It allows for a reframing of the Torah's teachings around blood sacrifice, ethnic conflicts, law codes, etc. as the cultural mythological traditions of ancient Israelite history rather than attributed to the most high El itself.
3) It creates space for the Christ figure of the New Testament to represent a re-emergence of the supreme El's sovereignty and universal spiritual path - overriding the outdated covenants, ethnic segregations, and violent subjugations prescribed by the lesser Yahweh consciousness.
4) Humanity's existential struggling, our proclivity towards violence/evil, and our fundamental state of cosmic imprisonment can be metaphysically associated with the fallout of our ancient reunion from Yahweh's corrupted influence rather than the designs of the supreme El consciousness.
5) Competing depictions of the divine across different books (wrathful/peaceful, loving/cruel, spiritual/legalistic) can be added to different nodes of the El vs. Yahweh consciousness schisms.
While still requiring some nuanced interpretation, this delineation allows for a coherent reintegration of Old and New Testament perspectives under a broader metaphysical framework. It preserves the universal spiritual integrity of the highest Creator from the cultural mythological contexts surrounding the more finite tribal deity Yahweh.
By embracing the pre-syncretized definitions and recognizing the conflation of El and Yahweh as a later imposition, one can reconnect with deep streams of ancient Hebrew theological diversity. This presents an intellectually robust path for understanding the unified trajectory of the biblical texts as exploring a single universetheological consciousness's reassertion over more contingent, anthropomorphized deviations and exiles.
El aka God is Jupiter (IU Piter) and Elohim is the period when the Ram (Aries) is in conjunction with the sun. Generally this is seven months which begin at the spring equinox. The signs are Aries thru Libra (Arc of the covenant) and are favored over the winter season of Scorpio thru Pisces. See Rev. 9.5., where this terrible five is led by the scorpion (Scorpio constellation). Scorpio, is called Satan, Father of Lies and he leads Sagittarius thru Pisces.
The notion that Yahweh is not the God of the New Testament was correctly condemned by the Church long ago. Obviously the Revelation of God was progressive. If there was confusion before the Exile, it was corrected later.
@@briteness
Some first follow the true Savior but then turn away to worship a dead man.
Exile/diaspora seems a recurring theme in the Jewish tradition: Egypt, Babylon and the Roman diaspora. New York is like the new Babylon. The divine right to reclaim the old land is still affecting the world. How bizarre.
Bizarre how multiple cultures spanning over a couple millenniums all have similar tales about their behavior.
@@notsocrates9529
The myths get passed around. The Babylon and Egyptian captivities are annual events and is simply the winter season of five months. See Rev. 9.5, where these five months of winter are led by the scorpion (Scorpio constellation).
Babel is two words of bab (gate) and el (god). Babylon or Babylon = gate of the sun god. By the time that Judaism and Christianity were invented, el had become Jupiter (properly IU Piter or IU Pater.)
Solomon is simply sun-sun-sun. The building of the temple of Solomon is an annual event and should not be considered as "historical."
Regarding the "historical Israel".... Israel is a compound of Isra (Phallus) and el (god). We could say phallus of Jupiter.
The bible is hugely Phallic and this should be explained to all students..
Because God promised the Israelites the land, but the promise was conditional. And when they didn't hold up their end of the bargain, they were exiled or scattered among the Nations. There are Orthodox Jews who believe they should still be living among the Nations now because they are supposed to be scattered instead of an official state
@@thinking7667 Fair enough
@@harveywabbit9541What were the phalluses of Egypt? That were the obelisks topped with the Ben Ben (seed - semen) stone.
Thanks!
Thank you for supporting the channel!
Finding of the scroll of the Law in the Temple is most likely a literary fiction, a back projection from the Persian times.
Nah. This is a channel belonging to a Mormon church. The people running it are literally modern-day evidence that this sort of thing happens all the time. ☺ Hilkiah was just his era's Joseph Smith.
i'm from babylonian 🇮🇶❤
Another inspiration for Revelation to speak of Har Megidddo is that after 70 CE the Romans may have built a legionnaire camp not far the tell there. Beginning around the time Revelation may have appeared, in the 90s CE. Later it was certainly called Legio. It became a major city after the Bar Kochba rebellion 60 years later. The army there could easily strike both Galilee and the plain of Caesarea Maritima as needed.
This gives more texture to the scene where the hobbits were asked to sing when faramir was sent out to die.
Citation to the Psalms, or prayers of the Jewish people in captitivity, are mostly totally out of context today.
Interesting. I largely agree. Can you expand on that for the Psalms specifically, please?
@@AaronGardner98 Just listen to Boney M.
Is the Old Testament about Jews or Hebrews??
We will return, God willing. We are the sons of Sumer and Babylon. Nothing is too much for us
i found the overall talk very difficult to follow. I kept saying to myself when? or date please? at particular times during the talk. But, what I'm really interested in is if the conquering Babylonians took the elites, rulers, and literate back to Babylon, destroyed the temple, (and I presume all the scrolls, and left only the herders and vine trimmers (I understand you must prune the vines to make them produce grapes and goats need to be cared for). That would destroy any history/bible/scholarship the hebrews would have had. I can't imagine their captors would allow the hebrews to sliept the OT back to Babylon. So, if they did destroy everything the hebrews had nothing but memories after 80 years as subjects to the Babylonians. And, the levant in general was a backwater with no water. First the Egyptians conquered the levant then the Hititites, then the Egyptians again (who knows how many times), then the Assyrians, other Mesopotamian groups, then Greeks, the Romans, the Ottomans, etc. would have conquered and razed the temples, libraries and schools to the ground. This would have obliterated any OT or any other book the hebrews may have had. How in anyone's world could anyone call the bible, "the word of god?"
Hey man great questions! I have thought many of these myself, some of modern biblical scholarship tries to find this out. There is a fantastic series on the Stanford RUclips page by Christine Hayes called " Introduction to the old testament" which I totally recommend. There is another academic called Dan McClellan ( also on youtube)who also has depths of knowledge about the O.T, and then a slightly more Niche channel called Esoterica (most of it is about different types of esotericism, but has great videos covering Old Testament history.
And in regards to your last sentence, I suppose that's why humans have been trying to find out and interact with for 100s of years now
Do you know this for a fact or are you just assuming that each culture obliterated any and all texts?
Rarely does everything get obliterated.
And...
The people at the time believed each land area had its own god. There is a story preserved about the people left in the land being attacked by wild animals. This was probably cause of the exodus of the local government, but the people took it to be divine retribution for not worshipping the local god. So they got some priests to show them how to make the local god happy.
Like a lot of ancient stories, not sure of historical accuracy.
@@thinking7667 No, but all the ones that were obliterated, we know for sure, they were completely destroyed. Trust me the cat in the box is really dead now.
Sublime does a song about this
And Bob Marley. Can’t stop hearing it.
Egypt was under Kushitic Kings from 744-656 B.C.E. In 720 BCE the Kushites went to Jerusalem to kick out the Assyrians.
Which Jerusalem are you speaking of. The two Jerusalems are the solstices. The winter solstice = the handmaid and the summer solstice = the free woman. Like in Ishmael and Isaac who are allegorical. Gal. 4.
Was the centralization of all Yahweh worship to Jerusalem done for economic reasons?
Heck yea brother
This guy needs to join Toastmasters. Listening to him is excruciating. It is the topic that holds your attention but his tonation, voice inflection, etc. needs serious work.
I 100% disagree
27:46
Whenever I encounter „sacrifice of the firstborn“, I think this relates to the lost civilization and the cataclysm. It would be magical thinking to make a deal with fate: to avoid another catastrophe by „freely“ sacrificing. But it also serves as a reminder of the civilization shattering event and the population bottleneck that likely accompanied it.
Same with the commandment to be fruitful and repopulate the world: sounds like a good idea post-cataclysm to ensure the survival of humanity.
I even think that Christianity as a whole in symbolically celebrating (and re-enacting in Passion plays) something akin to the „last human sacrifice“ (Christ), and the celebration of Resurrection unknowingly does the same: baptism (symbolically drowning the old Adam = Luther = re-enacting the flood on a personal level), painting the Ashen cross on your forehead on Ash Wednesday… - to me it’s all the same: pointing to the cataclysm and burning and ruin of the world and loss of civilization, and then subsequently our thankfulness for the resurrection of civilization, the survival of man.
What else could religion be: upholding the deal by all our little sacrifices to work together and continually (re-)construct civilization and our faith in it with every new generation: I think form follows function. There’s echoes of the same pattern everywhere (e.g. the symbol for the Earth in astronomy became the circle with the cross; Earth was literally in the cosmic crosshairs so to speak; the cross marks the spot (as Randall Carlson says)), because it happened at the birth of our current age, of recorded and reconstructed „history“ of civilization.
Sounding true to you does not make it true.
Aren't some saying that the so-called fake Moses script might have been the book Josiah found?
Because of this captivity. The captured Jewish priests had access to Babylonian texts. They inserted into the Bible. People in general have no idea the actual picture. Christianity was formed in Antioch not Jerusalem. The Jewish placed themselves in the Bible as the chosen ones. This was not the case originally. The actual Israelites are not the Jewish people.
Israel is a compound of Isra (phallus) and el (god). We could say that the 12 tribes are 12 phalluses or stones. Remember the upright stone (phallus) that Jacob (mythical character) anointed with oil (semen) and wine (passion)?
See Isaiah 9.14, where Israel (summer) is described as having the head of the noble/royal lion (Leo) and tail of the liar (Scorpio). The palm frond is Virgo and the Reed (water plant) is Libra. The four signs in Isaiah 9.14, are the four "sons" of Ham. They are also the first four labors of Hercules.
How did they place themselves in the Bible?
@@thinking7667 simple. Placed themselves as the chosen ones. But never were though.
@@thinking7667 they are not the Israelites. We are however the Amerites of in America. “Atlantis”
@@xp7575 12 tribes of Judah not 1. . Not the Jew first then the gentile. They are guilty by omission and never were the “chosen” ones. These so called bibles were taken from much older scriptures in Babylonian libraries. Written with a narrative that placed them as the Israelites. They never were ………….many times were they booted from countries all over the world for the same few crimes. The same being committed today.
Presume pagan cults to be inapposite to the tribal cults they were meant to replace. Your relationship with your female wolfdog had a religion.
Moore Cross than whom?
❤
No one ever sings the last verse of that _"Reebahs of Babylon"_ song.
{:o:O:}
38:00 Talk about tacky apologetics.
I love that funky song about Babylon which was maybe done by an African group of maybe black folk. Or maybe they were Caribbeans.
Boney M? German, essentially, but the mime people were mainly Caribbean I think (they were a precursor to Milli Vanilli, with the same music maker using them as a front)
A few reggae musicians have recorded that song. I think Jimmy Cliff does a version of it. Toots and the Maytals too. Great song.
1st century cushites from Ethiopia settle in Tanganyika
10th century AD about this time the fable of fijian from Tanganyika
( Chronological History man in Tanganyika )
It fable that about this the powerful chief Lutunasobasoba and his people followed the trade cross the Indian Ocean travelling south east Asia settled Fiji
ISAIAH 11 : 11
Kushites Egypt and Ruah river fiji Tanganyika
Islands pacific fiji
Ok, say it with me: “Jehoahaz” is “ye-HO-a-CHAZ” (with a guttural “ch” sound). As a Hebrew speaker, these Romanizations of Hebrew names can be grating. 😬
Grandfather ancient history brought circumcision culture tradition custom, fiji Islands pacific
Yahweh sounds like an abusive parent the children keep making excuses for. Yes, he allowed us to be destroyed as a Nation despite our new king doing everything right, but that was only because this one other king who reigned a long time ago (before most of us were born) made him really mad.
Who can blame the Israelites for seeking other Gods?
Boney m song
An oft repeated assumption is made in this lecture; that the elite, only, were literate. Were they really , or were the scribes slaves, who wrote (and corrected/improved) what was dictated to them. IMO its an important question as it means that the "words" were shaped by people who are largely invisible to us today.
While slavery of a scribal class was indeed very common, all the evidence we have from ancient history show it to have been the result of conquest. That is, the scribes ended up as slaves because they were elites from a group defeated and subordinated by the ruling empire. Basically, in the ancient world before Hellenism slave-scribes usually started out as someone else's elites. In the case of Judah, they were pretty low down the ladder in the conquest hierarchy, so it wasn't likely for them to have had slave-scribes of their own. However, the entrance of Mesopotamian ideas into their belief system may have been the result of their elite scribes serving as the Babylonians' slaves.
For a Mormon he's good.
Lets talk about GENOCIDE and ETHNIC CLEANSING in Gaza