The COMPROMISE of 1850 [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 4] Period 5: 1844-1877
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 июн 2024
- GET FOLLOW-ALONG NOTEGUIDES for this video: bit.ly/3NUwwmj
AP HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDE (formerly known as the Ultimate Review Packet):
+APUSH Heimler Review Guide: bit.ly/44p4pRL
+AP Essay CRAM Course (DBQ, LEQ, SAQ Help): bit.ly/3XuwaWN
+Bundle Heimler Review Guide and Essay CRAM Course: bit.ly/46tjbZo
HEIMLER’S HISTORY MERCH! / @heimlershistory
Instagram: @heimlers_history
For more videos on APUSH Unit 5, check out the playlist: [bit.ly/36EARDq](bit.ly/36EARDq)
In this video Heimler takes you through Unit 5 Topic 4 of the AP U.S. History curriculum which is set in period 5 (1844-1877).
After the new lands from the Mexican Cession (Mexican American War) came into the possession of the United States, the exceedingly contentious question over whether slavery would be allowed in those territories erupted.
The Wilmot Proviso proposed banning slavery in the new territories, but it was struck down in the Senate.
Southerners argued that the Missouri Compromise (Compromise of 1820) had already settled the issue. But ultimately at stake here was the precarious balance in the Senate between slave and free states.
In order to mollify the warring factions, Henry Clay proposed the Compromise of 1850 which settled the fractious passions of the North and South, but only for a while.
If you have any questions, leave them below and Heimler shall answer forthwithly.
This video is aligned with the AP U.S. History Curriculum and Exam Description for Unit 5 Topic 2, and all the key concepts thereunto appertaining.
![SECTIONAL Conflict: Regional Differences [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 5] Period 5: 1844-1877](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Rfv-jDlJEY8/mqdefault.jpg)
![SECTIONAL Conflict: Regional Differences [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 5] Period 5: 1844-1877](/img/tr.png)
![The FAILURE of Compromise Pre-Civil War [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 6] Period 5: 1844-1877](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/L3OOD9u1bR8/mqdefault.jpg)
![APUSH Unit 4 REVIEW [Period 4: 1800-1848]-Everything You NEED to Know](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-wnDpr9PMnc/mqdefault.jpg)
been here since ap world sophomore year and now I'm watching you for apush. heimler for president 2024
SAME
An actual life saver
How does that make him eligible for president 😂😂😂
@@breequeen2441 he's very well experienced in history and politics and stuff like that, he would actually do pretty well as president considering the fact he knows American history and government very well
@@Silentassassins229 knowing American history doesn’t make a good politician. The way I pick who I want in office is by observing what they promise to do for the community. All we know about him is that he knows his history, but that doesn’t make him qualified to be president. We know he can talk to kids really well, but what about adults, the voters of America? How good are his problem solving skills? I love heimler, don’t get me wrong, and he totally saved my history grade... but I feel like “heimler for president” is a little dramatic. Also, being a politician in this age isn’t a compliment lol
the dude that did the thumbs down is probably a teacher that doesn't want his students to succeed, smh
Yeah, can’t please everybody…
@@heimlershistory Kind of like how the Compromise of 1850 didn't appeal to the Union, amirite??? :D Darn history jokes
My notes:
Wilmot Proviso which would have prohibited slavery in new territories won from Mexican American War was turned down.
- Positions of those in power in regards to expansion of slavery into the territories
- Southern Position
○ Believed slavery was a constitutional right
○ Cited Missouri Compromise and said the line should continue to the Pacific Ocean as to where slavery could exist and where it could not
○ Any attempt to curtail slavery was a move to the South's destruction
- Free Soil movement
○ Composed of Northern Democrats and Whigs
§ Some abolitionists
○ Wanted new territories acquired to be the dominion of free laborers
§ Not necessarily about morality of slavery
§ Wanted white opportunity in these territories
- Popular Sovereignty
○ Argued that the people living in each territory should decide the slavery question for themselves
Exceedingly bitter fight between these three positions and there was no way to compromise
- With so much land that entered after the war, the debate became even worse
- With admission of California and New Mexico as free states, it tipped the balance of slave states vs free states in the senate
- Each state was equal in the senate so that no law could be passed to stop or prevent slavery since all votes would be 50-50
- Southern states were outraged that the two states were admitted as free because it meant the Senate was now unbalanced
To solve these problems, Henry Clay proposed the compromise of 1850 to calm the tensions
- Proposed Mexican Cession divided into Utah and New Mexico territories and would practice popular sovereignty
- California admitted as free state
- Slave trade banned in Washington DC
- Stricter Fugitive Slave Act
The fugitive slave act erased any calming of tensions the treaty might have other had
- Any slave that escaped to free states could now be captured by their owners and brought back
- Additionally, if any citizen in the north knew about a runaway slave, they were required by law to turn them in
your a fucking legend
@@natemont8418 Do you know how to contextualize on a DBQ? I always go too far back into the past or I double dip :/
@@all_a_asian9647 Yes I do, best thing to do is talk about what came right before. For instance war of 1812 i talk about the revolutionary war. The great awakening i talk about the pendulum of faith switching from more conservative to religious movements. Cold war i talk about the end of ww2 and status of the world. That seems to be the easiest way for me.
i love you
love u
Henry Clay finna make me act up 👀
Ayo ??
📸 📸🤨
Pause
I’m in no way close to here in my current unit but the way you teach history is so chill that I’m still watching anyways. Your channel is way too underrated.
*your
ur a life saver. ive watched all the videos since period 1 and like i dont even hate it u make it interesting
Helped me through World, now APUSH whats next?
AP Gov all day
5:25 yeah, i can feel the tension, may or may not be cause i have an saq next period…but we shall see
anybody else cramming for exam?
ive been cramming all of his unit reviews cuz my teacher hasn't even finished teaching unit 9 yet
@@Silentassassins229 a phatt rip
@@connosu_ indeed
I just wanted to thank you, you're the one way i understand the topics in APUSH. :)
as a student who is an USH and not APUSH because my teacher uses your videos, I wish you'd include pictures, I really do like your videos, we use them a lot.
girl
@@briannanila3198Some people learn better with visuals. Sure he uses some visuals but not many
Thanks for this
i love this man, he is saving me
Cries. It’s too late I took the test it was quite awful and I’m here for reassurance of how much I’ve missed. It was a long shot
Good luck on the exam cuties
thanks cutie ;)
I've got a study session soon. Listening to this so I can sound semi-intelligent during it😂
Thank you so much for all of these videos!
thank youuuu
It’s a great video, though. Your enthusiasm makes it even more interesting.
"In order for a bill to pass into law it requires a simple majority vote."
Once upon a time at least...
ur the best youtuber ever
Unit 7 PLZ
The practice of the Vice President of the United States serving as the tie-breaking vote in the Senate is established by the United States Constitution. Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution states that the Vice President shall be the President of the Senate and shall have the casting vote in case of a tie.
thank you besti
heimler you are my Pharaoh
Thanks that means a lot to hear
2024, class of 2025 let’s go
From Cotton to Cannabis Southern Cannabis to the Peculiar People #Giveusourharvest
Does the Free Soil Party support an abolitionist moral cause or merely "no extension of slavery" as an economic cause?
Some but not all were abolitionists
Sir, are you aware that New Mexico didn’t become a state until 1912? Around four minutes into your video you say New Mexico came in as a free state along with California around 1850.
Tomar
Sometimes winning a war causes problems.
Imperialism can have its downsides.
every war
I think that a very important thing to note that you did not note is that popular sovereignty is a misnomer for what it actually stood for. Popular does mean people and sovereignty does mean power, but the definition you provided can only be true if black people are excluded from "people". Popular sovereignty really means white democracy, nothing else.
and assumed texas debts
i m here after the exam :|
5:00 “50-50”? It is 50 50 today. Not back in the 1840s-50s
Good video but please talk slower, it's really hard to process what you're saying
hello there, i dont mean to force my religion on you at all. but Jesus is the messiah. he is the lord and savior of the world. please turn to him and repent from your sins! let's worship the Lord together!! Amen! Glory to the Lord almighty!A
I don’t mean force my religion on you but now I’m gonna do it any way! That is literally what you are doing idgaf about god ok I have my own gods and they don’t use fear tactics to make me believe in them. Comments like this are annoying and rude and saying your not trying to force religion doesn’t mean you now not doing it just don’t comment shit like this
Hold up, what does the first amendment say again?
@@tjclark1504 just cause you can say it doesn’t mean you should and it doesn’t take away from the fact that their comment was uncalled for. I don’t need to hear about Christianity every place I look it’s not the only religion and I should be able to have the ability to practice my religion in peace without Christians getting mad and coming in comments saying how their god loves me or that I’m going to hell.
@@runningmeadow1356 😂 I gotcha
@@runningmeadow1356 also it’s mega sus that this is literally the only comment on thier channel
It’s almost like it was a burner account to spam pro-Christianity messages in comment sections
(AGAIN YOU CAN SAY IT ITS JUST NOT NECESSARY IN 95% OF SITUATIONS)