Essentially everything he said in note form (sorry format is kind of messed up but anyways here it is): Topic 2: -July of 1845 gave American impulse for westward expansion a name: Manifest Destiny -What is it: To possess the whole continent from sea to shining sea/coast to coast -Who gave it: Providence/God -Idea is that Americans have a God-given right to take over land from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean (and later, more) -Needed for: -More access to minerals and natural resources -Discovery of gold in California: Gold Rush -More migration west -More economic + homestead opportunities -Preemption Acts of 1830s + 1840s -Religious refuge -Mormons -James K. Polk was a big believer in Manifest Destiny -Wanted Texas + Oregon -Texas had 3x more Americans than Mexicans by 1830 -Most of these Americans were Southern, Protestant, and slaveowners or sympathizers to slavery -In 1829 Mexican government made two requirements for immigrants living in Mexico -Must convert to Roman Catholicism + slavery outlawed -Americans initially ignored the laws -Mexico shut down border to further immigration in response -American immigrants kept coming -In 1834, Mexico had a change in government w/ dictator Santa Anna now the leader -Decided to enforce the laws -Rebelled under Sam Houston + claimed to be an independent republic in 1836 -Mexican gov't sent forces and had battles at Alamo (loss for Texans b/c all defenders were killed) and San Jacinto (victory for Texans b/c they captured Santa Anna) -Texas gained independence but Mexico did not recognize independence -Jackson, Van Buren, and John Tyler all wanted to annex (add) Texas to the U.S. but did not end up doing so (whether b/c of their decisions or b/c of the Senate) due to fears of going to war w/ Mexico -Texas stayed independent for a while -Oregon had both British and American settlers -Competing claims -British claimed land because they had established a profitable fur trade there and had been settled for much longer -America had been settling missionaries and farmers in far greater numbers than the British -James K. Polk wanted to add Texas + Oregon + California to the U.S. and had ran his election platform on the annexation of these territories -Since he won the presidency, he believed that it was the American people's will to add these territories to the U.S. and that it was his job to fulfill their desire -Predecessor John Tyler (in last months of presidency) annexed Texas -Mexican government not happy about the annexation and went to war with the U.S. -Polk worked out a treaty w/ Britain for Oregon (w/ Senate approval) and divided it at the 49th parallel
nah I like WHAP better, since we can understand how different things in different countries impacted each other and I really loved my teacher too so overall I would take whap over apush 10/10
Is there a reason that the review videos for the whole unit ended in unit 5? I found those super helpful since I'm sorta cramming the course, but I can't find them. Am I just being stupid?
hey i like the videos but how come you have full unit reviews for all units 1-4 of apush but on unit 5 and on its just the small videos instead of one with all the info. I like the one video and would love to see one for each unit
I'd like to make a correction. The general who signed the treaty was the same man who was the leader of the Mexican government (Santa Anna). The Mexican Congress refused to recognize it because Santa Anna signed it as a prisoner of war against his will, and also violated Mexican law.
I think we often confuse manifest destiny as an idea that Americans wanted to take land from the indigenous people as opposed to wanting spread their claims to the continent over and above other competing European powers. Consider that in the wake of warring European nations the indigenous tribes people were not seen as a sovereign or organized nations, they were not real competitors for the territory. While it is tragic that Americans did not respect them more and treat them better… their lands were going to be inhabited by more powerful nations. One could well imagine that had Europeans never set foot in the America’s that the Americas would have then been conquered by great native empires or later by asian expansion and imperialism. All of history is the story of advancing technology and the spread of those who use it.
And how abstract ideas such as religion and art play a role in the development, interactions, and conflicts between different groups of people over time.
@@aidanforman5950i feel like honestly those abstract ideas are a result of conflicts between people, like conflicts between different economic interests. religion, art, culture, it’s not the cause of these conflicts, but conflicting economic interests cause those things to be the way that they are. like the religion or culture we have is a way to maintain these conflicts and ensure that one dominant group of people stay in power- like a lot of the religious, artistic, and cultural movements in us history (and all history) to me seem to be a result of that
@elizabethkurth2069 No no. Religion is definitely the cause of many conflicts. Just look at the split in the Mulsim Caliphate, the Spanish Inquisition, the battles between different Christain groups all because their interpretations of the Bible were slightly different. I will say that monotheistic religions definitely cause way more conflicts than polytheism religions, but still.
@@aidanforman5950 if you examine these conflicts further, you may often find economic reasons behind them. I don’t know much about the Muslim Caliphate, but the Spanish Inquisition cannot be reduced to “being caused by religion.” A large part of the issue was the desire of the monarchy to expand influence economically and benefit their class interests, it was not entirely a religious issue- nothing really is entirely caused by religion, religion is often a cover or a justification for exploitation or conquest. You could also think about why such a religion, such a rigid, structured, hierarchal religion in which huge amounts of profits are garnered really exists- is that a natural human phenomenon, or is there a reason that people would create this type of religion beyond just spirituality? Namely, profit and economic interests. Look at televangelists, look at the Catholic Church, look at the way the British used Christianity as an excuse to create colonies or expand their rule- organized religion is often a result of economic organization, economic relations, and the interest of those in power to maintain their power through appealing to morality. Another thing is that organized religions as they exist today are often kept relevant because of the lack of adequate social services and access to basic necessities- the churches/ religious organizations provide this through charity because of the poor economic organization and poor economic status of many individuals, allowing the religion to maintain its power.
Fact: The General was the new ruler of Mexico - Santa Anna. Fact 2: Mexico didn't exactly abolish slavery in Texas, as Steven F. Austin convinced Mexico about it. Fact 3: Texas was also mad that Mexico merged them with Cohuila.
![The MEXICAN-AMERICAN War [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 3] Period 5: 1844-1877](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MOCr_4N0RM0/mqdefault.jpg)
![The MEXICAN-AMERICAN War [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 3] Period 5: 1844-1877](/img/tr.png)
![The COMPROMISE of 1850 [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 4] Period 5: 1844-1877](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aHIZONFF4nk/mqdefault.jpg)
![The FAILURE of Compromise Pre-Civil War [APUSH Review Unit 5 Topic 6] Period 5: 1844-1877](/img/1.gif)
I love how he manages to communicate lots of information, be goofy, and make it sound really conversational all at once😂
Time to cram for midterms. You are saving my grade right now thank you so much! I love all of your videos and helped me get a 4 on my ap world test.
me rn omg
bro same
Yessss passed with a 84!
Good job, man
Destiny is when I reviewed this in class today and then Heimler makes a video that fills in all the gaps.✨
Oh heck yes it is...
That Destiny is just Manifesting
@@vainavichilukuri5547 I’m a bit late, but ba dum tsss.
John 15:10
@@heimlershistory I lovee you sigma
The "Don't mess with Texas" bit actually had me on the floor. SO FUNNY
I'll say it again, Heimler's History is the goat
Just me cram reviewing last minute?
Most def not
my test is in an hour 😨
@@vecnadoesntlikegenesis3852try 5 min 😢
Test in 5
Test in a few hours, I'm cooked 😔
Best apush channel ever!
ha, thanks...
Best WHAP channel too this man helped me to a 5
@@slowedworks5237 nice
i just wanna thank you for making these videos. you're truly a life saver and such a good explainer!
heimy you should upload the audios from your videos on a podcast platform so people have more access to them as study resources
Essentially everything he said in note form (sorry format is kind of messed up but anyways here it is):
Topic 2:
-July of 1845 gave American impulse for westward expansion a name: Manifest Destiny
-What is it: To possess the whole continent from sea to shining sea/coast to coast
-Who gave it: Providence/God
-Idea is that Americans have a God-given right to take over land from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean (and later, more)
-Needed for:
-More access to minerals and natural resources
-Discovery of gold in California: Gold Rush
-More migration west
-More economic + homestead opportunities
-Preemption Acts of 1830s + 1840s
-Religious refuge
-Mormons
-James K. Polk was a big believer in Manifest Destiny
-Wanted Texas + Oregon
-Texas had 3x more Americans than Mexicans by 1830
-Most of these Americans were Southern, Protestant, and slaveowners or sympathizers to slavery
-In 1829 Mexican government made two requirements for immigrants living in Mexico
-Must convert to Roman Catholicism + slavery outlawed
-Americans initially ignored the laws
-Mexico shut down border to further immigration in response
-American immigrants kept coming
-In 1834, Mexico had a change in government w/ dictator Santa Anna now the leader
-Decided to enforce the laws
-Rebelled under Sam Houston + claimed to be an independent republic in 1836
-Mexican gov't sent forces and had battles at Alamo (loss for Texans b/c all defenders were killed) and San Jacinto (victory for Texans b/c they captured Santa Anna)
-Texas gained independence but Mexico did not recognize independence
-Jackson, Van Buren, and John Tyler all wanted to annex (add) Texas to the U.S. but did not end up doing so (whether b/c of their decisions or b/c of the Senate) due to fears of going to war w/ Mexico
-Texas stayed independent for a while
-Oregon had both British and American settlers
-Competing claims
-British claimed land because they had established a profitable fur trade there and had been settled for much longer
-America had been settling missionaries and farmers in far greater numbers than the British
-James K. Polk wanted to add Texas + Oregon + California to the U.S. and had ran his election platform on the annexation of these territories
-Since he won the presidency, he believed that it was the American people's will to add these territories to the U.S. and that it was his job to fulfill their desire
-Predecessor John Tyler (in last months of presidency) annexed Texas
-Mexican government not happy about the annexation and went to war with the U.S.
-Polk worked out a treaty w/ Britain for Oregon (w/ Senate approval) and divided it at the 49th parallel
The most important takeaway from this video:
*DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS!*
YESSIR
i cried during my leq so my teacher let me retake it, feeling good
all been there
Good idea
I’m going to try this.
I have a History test tomorrow and I already have a C- in History. Hoping I get a good grade because I haven't been doing so well this quarter.
OMG SAME! I’m hoping to get a good grade!
You make amazing content that helps us all, and we thank you for that. I don’t want to rush you, but will you do APEuro videos later too?
So glad you're finding some help. APUSH has me full up this year, so Euro won't come till next year (maybe the year after). Sorry...
@@heimlershistory That’s alright, take your time and thank you!
I should’ve taken APUSH, I’m currently in APWH but US history is more intriguing and intricate. Hopefully next year, love the vids ✌️
Yeah they're both interesting, but agreed that U.S. is more detailed...
we called AP world "WHAP" it rolls of the tongue better lol
nah I like WHAP better, since we can understand how different things in different countries impacted each other and I really loved my teacher too so overall I would take whap over apush 10/10
@@vihashah5975 dudeee i wish i could fit whap somewhere in my highschool career, unfortunately i cant 💔 world history is a lot more interesting to me
Oh this one was a TREAT, thank you so much for making these vids, they’re so helpful 😭
doing god's work, keep them coming king
Always...
God's* Praise the Lord!
Thank you Himmler for your accurate representation of Texans - a Texan
did u know that Polk was the only president in history to fulfill all of his campaign promises
How are u so perfectly on time, We started Unit 5 today!
You guys just started unit 5, we are on Kansas Nebraska act
@@ayaanmodi9815 nicee
thank you for making these videos, they help me so much!!!!
Glad to hear they're helping!
i love your videos! i use them to understand the terms better; which helps with my essay exams!!
This lecture seemed especially enthusiastic compared to previous ones. Keep it up! :)
you help me understand everything that I dont understand from my teacher!! remote learning sure is hard
only got one hour left to cram study before the midterm 😭 (i do great on seq’s but multi gets me bad)
Happy Birthday! (Or at least that's what famous birthdays says) Thank you for these videos they are a lifesaver in studying for the Exam!
how come there isnt and "everything you NEED to know" for unit 5?
Is there a reason that the review videos for the whole unit ended in unit 5? I found those super helpful since I'm sorta cramming the course, but I can't find them. Am I just being stupid?
Ha, no you’re not being stupid. Those videos for units 5-9 are only in my Ultimate Review Packet...
@@heimlershistorybut that’s not fair!!!😢
rip
Narzis had a similar concept called lebensraum, lzrel has a similar concept called Eratz lzrel
uploaded just in time for my test
hey i like the videos but how come you have full unit reviews for all units 1-4 of apush but on unit 5 and on its just the small videos instead of one with all the info. I like the one video and would love to see one for each unit
you have to pay and get his ultimate review packet or video course to get the unit reviews for the other videos, they're not on youtube
You are keeping me alive. Thank you for these videos
I'd like to make a correction. The general who signed the treaty was the same man who was the leader of the Mexican government (Santa Anna). The Mexican Congress refused to recognize it because Santa Anna signed it as a prisoner of war against his will, and also violated Mexican law.
Hey Mr, Heimler, could you please do unit 8-10 for APUSH. Thanks a bunch
i did not study time to take notes on these videos lets go
Hope they help!
You're amazingly hilarious, thank you!!
"Don't mess with Texas" 😂😂
Don't do it...
I think we often confuse manifest destiny as an idea that Americans wanted to take land from the indigenous people as opposed to wanting spread their claims to the continent over and above other competing European powers. Consider that in the wake of warring European nations the indigenous tribes people were not seen as a sovereign or organized nations, they were not real competitors for the territory. While it is tragic that Americans did not respect them more and treat them better… their lands were going to be inhabited by more powerful nations. One could well imagine that had Europeans never set foot in the America’s that the Americas would have then been conquered by great native empires or later by asian expansion and imperialism. All of history is the story of advancing technology and the spread of those who use it.
We don’t confuse it. We just don’t ignore it. Populations were exterminated over generations.
And how abstract ideas such as religion and art play a role in the development, interactions, and conflicts between different groups of people over time.
@@aidanforman5950i feel like honestly those abstract ideas are a result of conflicts between people, like conflicts between different economic interests. religion, art, culture, it’s not the cause of these conflicts, but conflicting economic interests cause those things to be the way that they are. like the religion or culture we have is a way to maintain these conflicts and ensure that one dominant group of people stay in power- like a lot of the religious, artistic, and cultural movements in us history (and all history) to me seem to be a result of that
@elizabethkurth2069
No no. Religion is definitely the cause of many conflicts. Just look at the split in the Mulsim Caliphate, the Spanish Inquisition, the battles between different Christain groups all because their interpretations of the Bible were slightly different. I will say that monotheistic religions definitely cause way more conflicts than polytheism religions, but still.
@@aidanforman5950 if you examine these conflicts further, you may often find economic reasons behind them. I don’t know much about the Muslim Caliphate, but the Spanish Inquisition cannot be reduced to “being caused by religion.” A large part of the issue was the desire of the monarchy to expand influence economically and benefit their class interests, it was not entirely a religious issue- nothing really is entirely caused by religion, religion is often a cover or a justification for exploitation or conquest.
You could also think about why such a religion, such a rigid, structured, hierarchal religion in which huge amounts of profits are garnered really exists- is that a natural human phenomenon, or is there a reason that people would create this type of religion beyond just spirituality? Namely, profit and economic interests. Look at televangelists, look at the Catholic Church, look at the way the British used Christianity as an excuse to create colonies or expand their rule- organized religion is often a result of economic organization, economic relations, and the interest of those in power to maintain their power through appealing to morality.
Another thing is that organized religions as they exist today are often kept relevant because of the lack of adequate social services and access to basic necessities- the churches/ religious organizations provide this through charity because of the poor economic organization and poor economic status of many individuals, allowing the religion to maintain its power.
Thank you so much!
You're welcome!
should i watch all of the vids then the review video or just the review video for each APUSH topic?
Don’t mess with Texas 😂
Don't do it.
Got me my first A on an APUSH test
Dub
i purchased the ulitmate review guide! where is topic 1?
The first and last topics of the unit are summaries of the whole unit, so the units summary video covers both of them. I hope it helps!
Hi you’re the best
Yeah Texas Mentioned 💪💪💪
Is this for US history EOC as well
What is topic 1?
Where’s topic 1?
As I am writing down notes I’m wondering how long one man can talk about Texas for 😂😅😅
Thank you so much.
Is there a topic 1 video?
Did u find out?
@@Aaron-vw2on unit 1 video only available to those who buy his ultimate review packet 👍🏻
Hello! Do you have an overview review video for period 5?
He doesn’t share the rest of the review videos publicly. They come with the Ultimate Review Packet
John 14:21
You might not believe this however I am related to Davy Crockett, a soldier from the alamo.
Where's the Unit 5 review? :(((
"DON'T MESS WITH TEXAS!" 4:50
Thanks bud
Fact: The General was the new ruler of Mexico - Santa Anna.
Fact 2: Mexico didn't exactly abolish slavery in Texas, as Steven F. Austin convinced Mexico about it.
Fact 3: Texas was also mad that Mexico merged them with Cohuila.
What country had California before the U?S
Hi Crystal
Go west young man
Good cideo
Katherine Street
I guess we shouldn't mess with Texas
you look like vsauce with less eyebrow
That's what they tell me...
@@heimlershistory "hey vsauce, heimler here. what is a brain cow?"
1:24
The good ol days when americans were crossing the mexican border illegally
ily
My G
Sawayn Course
Borer Street
Don't mess with texas
Never…
Colorado Nevada Dakota California
Where tf was this a month ago :cry:
Dont. Mess. With. Texas.
takeaways:
dont mess with texas
are you messing with texa-
I SaId DoNt MEsS wItH TeXas!
Douglas Springs
Texans be texans
Im so cooked
Nitzsche Corner
Larkin Extensions
Wanna hear a joke mister Heimler?
Obviously.
Heimler's History ok the joke is
Why are Turks always afraid?
Im dying for the answer
He never finished... so sad
Stupid boii oh sorry forgot
#giveusourharvest
my teacher started moving faster:((((
Rolfson Wells
E
Bro everybody always travelin around bc of the three Gs
Russel Green
Caleigh Park
Jacquelyn Centers
Effertz Isle
Andy Flats
Pamela Rue
Kariane Estate
Tromp Center
Kiehn Haven
Ramona Turnpike
Jaqueline Courts
Von Lodge
Mac Villages