As always Maarten, a very well put together review with a nice flow to the extensive amount of detailed information shared in one production. I applaud you for the clarity and all-inclusive reviews that share good points and limitations.
As always an informative and detailed video. The 70-300mm would be the perfect travel lens together with the 18-80mm. I already got the 100-400mm, but it's quite heavy for traveling. It's a little bit baffling how lightweight the 70-300mm is compared with the 100-400mm.
I don't see this mentioned in any other comments but I don't think the teleconverters work with all x-mount lenses as stated around 12:35. To my knowledge, only the 70-300, 50-140, and 100-400 are able to use the 1.4x and 2.0x converters. The converter has a magnification barrel that sticks out the lens side so the lens needs to adapt to fit over that barrel. I use the 1.4 on my 100-400 with great results for far off stationary birds. Tripod mandatory!
@12:34 you said that the tele converter works with all Xmonut lessens, that is not the case, it works only with Fuji lenses that have the glass inside the lens moved inward, so the tele converter front glass can go inside.
Finally a big channel talking about the zoom problem of the Fuji lenses, that kind of blur effect, also the exposure problem on some fixed aperture model like the 16-80. We know most are not parfocal, but competitors offer cheap solutions without this problem in video, and I doubt some lenses are really parfocal like a basic 14-42 Lumix. I made a video about it time ago. 👍🏻 Ths solution is not to suggest or use the cinema lines btw, considering there is no autofocus and there aree many alternative in the mirrorless market with Autofocus and great for AF, it's mostly a Fuji lens design "problem". Lumix docet. Also this problem during a zoom action can create troubles for stills, when you're tracking a moving subject and you need to zoom you may encounter some scene blackout or stutter during the zoom. Really visible on the 50-140 2.8, too much blue during normal use when zooming, even without recording any video. I made the video to reach Fujifilm and find an answer about these behavior, I do not have the answer yet, it's a real downside for an hybrid system as Fujifilm says.
@@MaartenHeilbron 😊 nice lens the new 70-300. But I prefer to have the 100-400 and tc 1.4x for more reach, the best combo on earth for the price and focal, but still out of my budget at the moment. 🤣
@@MaartenHeilbron bit late to this conversation, but would like to know why you won't recommend for video? I've recently picked this one up, and have (to my dismay) found it very soft when using a VND filter (yes, it is a 'fotga', so not best quality, but still didn't expect this horrible softness). Any advice of VND's that is suitable for video shooting with 70-300?
This lens does not maintain focus as you change the focal length. In my mind that makes it unsuitable for video. I would recommend a 3 or 5 stop ND filter from a reputable brand like Tiffen, B=W or Hoya.
You would sure be an experienced and inspiring photographer. I am an amateur still trying to learn. Still with the kit lens 18-55. And wanted to have the 70-300 someday just for more reach and birds
I bought an XF 70-300mm lens today for my X-E3 camera and plan to take them to the total solar eclipse in 2024. I was rather concerned that looking at the IS MODE menu there was no option to turn off the image stabilisation and this is the preferred way of using the camera when on a tripod. The people in the shop were puzzled with this and I was prepared to upgrade to the X-S10 if the X-E3 wouldn't work properly with the new lens. However, on putting the 70-300mm lens on the X-E3 in the shop and switching on the camera, the IS MODE menu showed the OFF menu item. So, it looks like the camera / lens combination will be suitable for taking photographs on a tripod. Unfortunately, the 70-300mm doesn't have a lens collar or a standard Fujifilm accessory to mount the lens directly onto a tripod. However, iShoot makes one that is compatible with both the 70-300 and the 50-200 lenses. It looks good, but I am concerned that it could scratch the lovely brand new lens, especially as the lens is mostly made out of plastic. In your opinion, do these types of lens collars mark the lens?
Yes, the only way to turn off stabilization is in the camera menu. I haven't tried this device, so can't offer any advice. A few external scratches may be worth the results.
Hello, I'm a subscriber to your channel and I really enjoy your videos. I have a question about the Fuji 70-300mm lens. Can it blur the background when you focus on an object or person that is 15-20 meters away?
I'm glad someone thorough and unbiased like you has finally reviewed the 70-300. In your opinion, is the trade off between image quality and reach when using the 2x teleconverter worth it? I'll probably rent both teleconverters before buying one, but I'm interested in an outside opinion. Thank you for this video!
@@MaartenHeilbron Sorry, I didn't mean that to sound like "what took you so long". I've been looking forward to seeing a bit about what people, who are not directly related to Fuji's marketing, think about it before the release date. Until the pandemic winds down a bit, I'm kind of limited to taking pictures of birds in trees behind my apartment and not being able to rent lenses. My 16-80 is really struggling so I'm excited for a new option!
I recently acquired the 2x tc and now I have both. Tested it on the my 50-140 which is already a very sharp lens. I was happy with the results as the the image degradation isnt drastic to my eyes. Handled abberation well and loss of detail isn't noticeably bad. The only gripe is the loss of light by 2x of course but I think I can live with it by using the tc sparingly with decent lighting conditions. Cant wait to pair it with the 70-300 when it finally arrives.
I would love your thoughts 100-400 compared to 70-300. IM in particular as I have the former but I am thinking to get the latter for long reach in my landscape travels. I use the GFX primarily for that but also carry the XT4 as backup/long reach camera
I've had my eye on the 70-300 since its announcement. I find the 55-200 isn't always quite enough reach for my son's soccer games (not to mention a sometimes hazy image at the full 200mm), so I've been hopeful that this new lens might fill that need better. Thanks for this breakdown of the newest lenses!
Always my pleasure! Thanks for taking the time to comment with your kind words. I agree, I had that feeling as well, that the further I zoomed in, the less contrast. I couldn't reproduce that in a test, but
@@MaartenHeilbron thanks for quick reply, i was thinking same. On Canon FF i had 100-400 Tamron i was usually on 250-300 mm. How is the sharpness between 70-300 and 55-200mm
Hi Maarten, thanks for another informative video. My question: you say that the teleconverter fits all x-mount lenses. The last Fuji teleconverter I owned did not fit my 55-200mm lens. Is this a new converter and if so, will it fit the 55-200mm? Many thanks!
Nice to hear again sir! Sir if you also have a comparison between the 70-300 and the 100-400mm. Looking forward for your advice .. I only have here the 50-140mm but I want to go further and get close to my subjects, I am planning to get the 100-400mm but when this 70-300mm came out, it makes me decide ok i will just wait to read and see more reviews about it. thank you so much.
Thanks Maarten helped me with my choice of the XS10 coupled with the 16 to 80 and the 70 to 300. Not a bad setup what do you think? Bit of a wait in the UK for all the above but all good things come to those who wait
The only downside to the XS10 is perhaps the lack of WR, kind of helpful for UK no? Considering the two lens you are getting are both WR, I think the XT3 is on sale with the 16-80 in a kit. Perhaps a better buy, you lose IBIS but you gain quite a lot too.
@@mixeddrinks8100 I would not consider the general weather in the UK - unless you regularly shoot in rainstorms - to be a drawback. the lack of WR designation doesn't mean it will fail if there's a little rain.
You stated that the 2x teleconverter works with all X mount lenses. That’s not correct. Only the 100-400mm, 70-300mm, 50-140mm and 80mm are compatible with either of Fuji’s two teleconverters.
Another little slip Maarten. Converter only connects to some, not all X mount lenses. 100-400, 50-140, 80 macro and the new 70-300. Of course I know you knew that!
I think you covered everything. This is all you need 10-24, 16-80, and 70-300. Was really nice to see how small the 70-300, and the extender makes it a little better lens than the one Nikon makes. But it’s slower than my Nikon 70-300. I would still need prime lenses, but would get the 23mm for my primary lens. The image quality with the X-E4 look pretty good. Fujifilm MKX lenses on an X-E4?
I have a question about the lens hood for the 70-300. Are the tabs that clicks when you twist it on to the lens on very thin plastic “bits or arms” (I don’t know what to call them, English is not my native language), or are they thicker? I’m asking because the tabs on the lens hood for the 90mm lens are on very thin plastic. They have broken for me, even though I’m always careful with my gear. It’s actually happened twice. I got a replacement hood and it also lost the tabs. I’m just worried that this new lens might have the same design. The old 55-200mm had a much more sturdy design, so I hope it’s more like that. (Hope that was understandable)
Hi, thanks for the review, I've been thinking about buying it and any info is truly relevant. Currently, I have the XC 50-230, and I'd like to have more reach, and faster autofocus, how does it performs in continuous vs the "cheap" one I have?
Hi Maarten, Do you know the lens will work well at 300 with my xt2? There is no ibis in the camera. If so, do you think the 1.4 teleconverter would work without ibis? Thanks in advance.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks Maarten, do you think I can hand hold it though? getting my shutter speed fast enough not darkening it the photo to much that I need to raise the ISO to the point where it compromises the image quality? Thanks again in advance, Colin
thank you Maarten - excellent and concise as always :-) I was interested in the 70-300, but have invested in the GF100-200 instead (I know - I am beyond hope and help!!)
Maarten your videos are always so helpful. I was wondering if you would give me your opinion on this: For bird and wildlife would you get the 1.4x TC or the 2.x to go on the 70-300mm. My dilemma is in thinking that 210mm (35mm equiv.) minimum FL might be too much?... Or not...I'm a new hobby photographer with a penchant for birds and wildlife. Thank you.
Yeah I own both teleconverter to use with the 50-140. I hesitated to purchase the 2x tc but ended getting it anyways to pair up with the 70-300 rather getting the beastly 100-400. I find the 2x is definitely sharp enough imo. My dilema now is to keep both tc or get rid of the 1.4x since they are limited to few certain lenses. I know id be losing 2x stops of light vs 1 but I'd be earning my money back to put towards the 70-300 when it arrives in stock. I find my sweet spot for birding is in the 500-600mm range and I can always crop too if I need to fill the frame by using xt3's sports mode 1.25x or manually in post.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
You have a great calm voice. Everything clearly explained. Thank you for not including commercials for your videos!
So nice of you to say, thanks for the kind words.
Your videos are always a reference. Thanks for your time and work.
So nice of you to say, thanks, appreciated.
As always Maarten, a very well put together review with a nice flow to the extensive amount of detailed information shared in one production. I applaud you for the clarity and all-inclusive reviews that share good points and limitations.
Many thanks! A pleasure to read your very kind words.
Always much better than we expect.
Thanks so much Maarten.
How kind! Thanks very much!!
Helpful, and clearly explained - thank you.
You're welcome! I appreciate your kind words.
Very informative, non confrontational and thoughtful Maarten. I aspire to be like you one day!
Wow, thank you! It's always a pleasure to read kind words from my viewers.
Amazing details review. Thanks. The most dependable advise which can be followed with no doubt. 👍👏🏽
Glad you enjoyed it! A pleasure to read your kind words, thanks!
I love your presentation style and flow :D
What a pleasure to read your kind words, thanks very much!!
One of the best youtubers
You are very kind, thanks very much!!
As always an informative and detailed video. The 70-300mm would be the perfect travel lens together with the 18-80mm. I already got the 100-400mm, but it's quite heavy for traveling. It's a little bit baffling how lightweight the 70-300mm is compared with the 100-400mm.
Thanks for the kind words. The weight saving is likely due to the ramped aperture range.
@@unclefester6501 No. All XC-series mics are plasticky and really not worth considering.
Thank you for a well presented, interesting and highly informative review of Fujifilm lenses I love to use!
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Already at the start 01:04 giving so much great insights. Thank you, super helpful
Great to hear! Always nice to hear from viewers who appreciate my videos.
Maarten- Regarding ads, I did get a preroll and midroll ad when viewing this video. Thanks for the excellent content!
Thanks. I'll check the mid-roll settings again, sometimes it doesn't take.
Little correction: You forgot the 50mm f/1.0, so the fastest aperture is f/1.0 not 1.2 (at about 4:55)
Thanks! I always appreciate the corrections.
I don't see this mentioned in any other comments but I don't think the teleconverters work with all x-mount lenses as stated around 12:35. To my knowledge, only the 70-300, 50-140, and 100-400 are able to use the 1.4x and 2.0x converters. The converter has a magnification barrel that sticks out the lens side so the lens needs to adapt to fit over that barrel. I use the 1.4 on my 100-400 with great results for far off stationary birds. Tripod mandatory!
Yes, that's correct, as others have pointed out, and as updated in the description.
Many thanks for these very high quality videos :)
Glad you like them! Thanks for your kind words.
Solid roundup of the new Fujis! I have my eye on the 70-300 😁
Thanks for the kind words, appreciated!!
Beautiful simple clear informative video, thanks for posting
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for taking the time to comment.
I really enjoyed the wide to telephoto examples. I think the 70-300mm would be very useful for some of my photography.
Absolutely!
12:30 isn't the teleconverter only works for specific lens?
As other commenter s have pointed out, and as I corrected in the description, that is true. I mis-spoke.
As always very informative. Thank you very much for what you do!
My pleasure! Thanks for taking the time to post your kind words, always nice to see your comments.
@12:34 you said that the tele converter works with all Xmonut lessens, that is not the case, it works only with Fuji lenses that have the glass inside the lens moved inward, so the tele converter front glass can go inside.
You're right, that is not the case. The correction is noted in the description.
As usual very nice explanation! Thanks!
Glad you liked it! Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Finally a big channel talking about the zoom problem of the Fuji lenses, that kind of blur effect, also the exposure problem on some fixed aperture model like the 16-80. We know most are not parfocal, but competitors offer cheap solutions without this problem in video, and I doubt some lenses are really parfocal like a basic 14-42 Lumix. I made a video about it time ago. 👍🏻
Ths solution is not to suggest or use the cinema lines btw, considering there is no autofocus and there aree many alternative in the mirrorless market with Autofocus and great for AF, it's mostly a Fuji lens design "problem". Lumix docet. Also this problem during a zoom action can create troubles for stills, when you're tracking a moving subject and you need to zoom you may encounter some scene blackout or stutter during the zoom. Really visible on the 50-140 2.8, too much blue during normal use when zooming, even without recording any video.
I made the video to reach Fujifilm and find an answer about these behavior, I do not have the answer yet, it's a real downside for an hybrid system as Fujifilm says.
Right. Thanks for adding this detail. Always nice to see your avatar among the comments.
@@MaartenHeilbron 😊 nice lens the new 70-300. But I prefer to have the 100-400 and tc 1.4x for more reach, the best combo on earth for the price and focal, but still out of my budget at the moment. 🤣
@@nerdMike Understood. I'm certain you're not the only one.
How can I shoot a video with this lens? Please give the video shooting settings for Fuji XT4 camera I want to shoot landscapes and seascapes. Thanks
I would not recommend this lens for that purpose - either for video or for wide angle scenes.
@@MaartenHeilbronthank you so much.
@@MaartenHeilbron bit late to this conversation, but would like to know why you won't recommend for video? I've recently picked this one up, and have (to my dismay) found it very soft when using a VND filter (yes, it is a 'fotga', so not best quality, but still didn't expect this horrible softness). Any advice of VND's that is suitable for video shooting with 70-300?
This lens does not maintain focus as you change the focal length. In my mind that makes it unsuitable for video. I would recommend a 3 or 5 stop ND filter from a reputable brand like Tiffen, B=W or Hoya.
You would sure be an experienced and inspiring photographer. I am an amateur still trying to learn. Still with the kit lens 18-55. And wanted to have the 70-300 someday just for more reach and birds
Thanks for your kind words.
Packed with information! Thank you so much
Thanks, that's exactly my intention. I appreciate the kind words.
Great presentation! Looking forward to test 70-300 and hopefully to buy it with 2x TC.
Have fun! Thanks for the kind words.
I bought an XF 70-300mm lens today for my X-E3 camera and plan to take them to the total solar eclipse in 2024. I was rather concerned that looking at the IS MODE menu there was no option to turn off the image stabilisation and this is the preferred way of using the camera when on a tripod. The people in the shop were puzzled with this and I was prepared to upgrade to the X-S10 if the X-E3 wouldn't work properly with the new lens. However, on putting the 70-300mm lens on the X-E3 in the shop and switching on the camera, the IS MODE menu showed the OFF menu item. So, it looks like the camera / lens combination will be suitable for taking photographs on a tripod.
Unfortunately, the 70-300mm doesn't have a lens collar or a standard Fujifilm accessory to mount the lens directly onto a tripod. However, iShoot makes one that is compatible with both the 70-300 and the 50-200 lenses. It looks good, but I am concerned that it could scratch the lovely brand new lens, especially as the lens is mostly made out of plastic. In your opinion, do these types of lens collars mark the lens?
Yes, the only way to turn off stabilization is in the camera menu. I haven't tried this device, so can't offer any advice. A few external scratches may be worth the results.
@@MaartenHeilbron Many thanks for your reply. I have just ordered the lens collar and will let you know what I think of it when I have tried it out.
I look forward to your update.
Hello, I'm a subscriber to your channel and I really enjoy your videos.
I have a question about the Fuji 70-300mm lens.
Can it blur the background when you focus on an object or person that is 15-20 meters away?
Thanks for the kind words. Yes, that's totally possible, as you see in the images in the video or posted on flickr.
I'm glad someone thorough and unbiased like you has finally reviewed the 70-300.
In your opinion, is the trade off between image quality and reach when using the 2x teleconverter worth it? I'll probably rent both teleconverters before buying one, but I'm interested in an outside opinion.
Thank you for this video!
Finally? It's not even officially available in Canada yet. It depends on your subject, yes, probably.
@@MaartenHeilbron Sorry, I didn't mean that to sound like "what took you so long". I've been looking forward to seeing a bit about what people, who are not directly related to Fuji's marketing, think about it before the release date.
Until the pandemic winds down a bit, I'm kind of limited to taking pictures of birds in trees behind my apartment and not being able to rent lenses. My 16-80 is really struggling so I'm excited for a new option!
@@nicholascooper843 Thanks. Hopefully, we will all have our mobility back soon.
I recently acquired the 2x tc and now I have both. Tested it on the my 50-140 which is already a very sharp lens. I was happy with the results as the the image degradation isnt drastic to my eyes. Handled abberation well and loss of detail isn't noticeably bad. The only gripe is the loss of light by 2x of course but I think I can live with it by using the tc sparingly with decent lighting conditions.
Cant wait to pair it with the 70-300 when it finally arrives.
@@streetzine Great to hear, thanks for commenting.
I would love your thoughts 100-400 compared to 70-300. IM in particular as I have the former but I am thinking to get the latter for long reach in my landscape travels. I use the GFX primarily for that but also carry the XT4 as backup/long reach camera
The 70-300 is lighter and smaller - otherwise, you've got all the reach you need!
I've had my eye on the 70-300 since its announcement. I find the 55-200 isn't always quite enough reach for my son's soccer games (not to mention a sometimes hazy image at the full 200mm), so I've been hopeful that this new lens might fill that need better. Thanks for this breakdown of the newest lenses!
Always my pleasure! Thanks for taking the time to comment with your kind words. I agree, I had that feeling as well, that the further I zoomed in, the less contrast. I couldn't reproduce that in a test, but
What a pleasant video.
Thank you for your kind words, appreciated.
What lens would you recommend for shooting kiteboarding? 70-300mm or 55-200?
No experience with that myself, but imagine the longer reach of the 70-300 will be useful.
@@MaartenHeilbron thanks for quick reply, i was thinking same. On Canon FF i had 100-400 Tamron i was usually on 250-300 mm. How is the sharpness between 70-300 and 55-200mm
I was not able to compare them side by side, so can't comment.
Hi Maarten, thanks for another informative video. My question: you say that the teleconverter fits all x-mount lenses. The last Fuji teleconverter I owned did not fit my 55-200mm lens. Is this a new converter and if so, will it fit the 55-200mm? Many thanks!
I was wrong. It does not fit on that, or on most Fujifilm lenses.
@@MaartenHeilbron Which means, I'll HAVE TO buy the new 70-300mm ;-) Many thanks for your speedy reply.
@@nadjawendt380 Understood. Enjoy.
Nice to hear again sir! Sir if you also have a comparison between the 70-300 and the 100-400mm. Looking forward for your advice .. I only have here the 50-140mm but I want to go further and get close to my subjects, I am planning to get the 100-400mm but when this 70-300mm came out, it makes me decide ok i will just wait to read and see more reviews about it. thank you so much.
Thanks, I appreciate your kind words. At this point, I'm not planning to do that comparison - mostly because I don't have a 100-400.
@@MaartenHeilbron ok. Anyway thank you so much i am always one of your follower. Waiting for your next video..
Thanks Maarten helped me with my choice of the XS10 coupled with the 16 to 80 and the 70 to 300. Not a bad setup what do you think? Bit of a wait in the UK for all the above but all good things come to those who wait
Sounds like a good plan to me.
The only downside to the XS10 is perhaps the lack of WR, kind of helpful for UK no? Considering the two lens you are getting are both WR, I think the XT3 is on sale with the 16-80 in a kit. Perhaps a better buy, you lose IBIS but you gain quite a lot too.
@@mixeddrinks8100 I would not consider the general weather in the UK - unless you regularly shoot in rainstorms - to be a drawback. the lack of WR designation doesn't mean it will fail if there's a little rain.
great content. only problem I encountered with this lens is the sagging when it is mounted on a tripod
Thanks for the kind words. Does your tripod not have a tilt lock?
@@MaartenHeilbron I guess it is caused by the ball head maybe?
@@jerickjann06 Right. Those can be notoriously difficult to tighten - perhaps you're now exceeding the weight of the tripod.
You stated that the 2x teleconverter works with all X mount lenses. That’s not correct. Only the 100-400mm, 70-300mm, 50-140mm and 80mm are compatible with either of Fuji’s two teleconverters.
Yes, I mis-spoke. The corrections are in the description.
Another little slip Maarten. Converter only connects to some, not all X mount lenses. 100-400, 50-140, 80 macro and the new 70-300. Of course I know you knew that!
Sorry just saw the earlier comment. Me jumping high I guess.
Thanks - however, I do always appreciate the correction when I mis-speak.
Where's the "join" option?
Should be below the video. Not sure why it doesn't always appear. Alternately, go back to the RUclips.com/maartech home page for my channel.
I think you covered everything. This is all you need 10-24, 16-80, and 70-300. Was really nice to see how small the 70-300, and the extender makes it a little better lens than the one Nikon makes. But it’s slower than my Nikon 70-300. I would still need prime lenses, but would get the 23mm for my primary lens. The image quality with the X-E4 look pretty good. Fujifilm MKX lenses on an X-E4?
Thanks for your kind words. I would not actually be tempted to use the X-E4 for any video purpose, MKX lens or no.
Just a note, fuji's teleconverter only works with a hand full of lenses, 50-140, 100-400 and 70-300. Maybe one or 2 more.
Thanks. I've made the correction in the description.
@@MaartenHeilbron NP (:
I don't think the 2x converter works will all x-mount lenses. It only works with some like the 70-300, not the 27, or the 16-80
Correct. I mis-spoke.
I have a question about the lens hood for the 70-300. Are the tabs that clicks when you twist it on to the lens on very thin plastic “bits or arms” (I don’t know what to call them, English is not my native language), or are they thicker?
I’m asking because the tabs on the lens hood for the 90mm lens are on very thin plastic. They have broken for me, even though I’m always careful with my gear. It’s actually happened twice. I got a replacement hood and it also lost the tabs.
I’m just worried that this new lens might have the same design.
The old 55-200mm had a much more sturdy design, so I hope it’s more like that.
(Hope that was understandable)
Hmmm. I don't know how to describe them for you. They seem substantial enough, but don't have the 90mm to compare.
I would be grateful for your thoughts on how the I.Q. of the 70-300mm compares to the older 55-200mm.
I didn't have the change to compare them side by side.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks for getting back.
Awesome work man, Quick question is that a green screen behind ye?
Yes, the give-away is that the snowflakes are too large.
@@MaartenHeilbron It also looks like a picture frame not a window (:
@@lesleycrystal1205 I"m sorry if my work is not up to your standards. Please lower your standards.
Hi, thanks for the review, I've been thinking about buying it and any info is truly relevant. Currently, I have the XC 50-230, and I'd like to have more reach, and faster autofocus, how does it performs in continuous vs the "cheap" one I have?
I thought I demonstrated that - I didn't have them side by side, but in my opinion it was faster.
Ahhh a new vid. Looks cold out there right now, perhaps a cuppa. Stay cozy everyone.
Warm inside though! Thanks for the kind words, always nice to see your friendly avatar.
Hi Maarten, Do you know the lens will work well at 300 with my xt2? There is no ibis in the camera. If so, do you think the 1.4 teleconverter would work without ibis? Thanks in advance.
Yes and yes, depending on your shutter speed and the use of a tripod to mitigate.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks Maarten, do you think I can hand hold it though? getting my shutter speed fast enough not darkening it the photo to much that I need to raise the ISO to the point where it compromises the image quality? Thanks again in advance, Colin
@@lesleycrystal1205 That depends entirely on the situation. Eventually, even with stabilization, you run out of light and higher ISOs are inevitable.
thank you Maarten - excellent and concise as always :-)
I was interested in the 70-300, but have invested in the GF100-200 instead (I know - I am beyond hope and help!!)
What makes that decision beyond help?
@@MaartenHeilbron just the buying of even more lenses I guess :-)
@@duringthemeanwhilst Oh. hehe
Teleconverters do not work with all X-mount lenses, only a few zooms.
Yes, thanks. I've corrected the description.
I've heard conflicting info if the xf 27mm mkII is quieter focusing then the previous version, does it seem like it to you?
Wasn't able to compare side-by-side, but it seems quiet enough to me.
@@MaartenHeilbron thanks!
Maarten your videos are always so helpful. I was wondering if you would give me your opinion on this: For bird and wildlife would you get the 1.4x TC or the 2.x to go on the 70-300mm. My dilemma is in thinking that 210mm (35mm equiv.) minimum FL might be too much?... Or not...I'm a new hobby photographer with a penchant for birds and wildlife. Thank you.
Go with the 2x, it's not too much.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you Maarten!
Yeah I own both teleconverter to use with the 50-140. I hesitated to purchase the 2x tc but ended getting it anyways to pair up with the 70-300 rather getting the beastly 100-400. I find the 2x is definitely sharp enough imo. My dilema now is to keep both tc or get rid of the 1.4x since they are limited to few certain lenses. I know id be losing 2x stops of light vs 1 but I'd be earning my money back to put towards the 70-300 when it arrives in stock.
I find my sweet spot for birding is in the 500-600mm range and I can always crop too if I need to fill the frame by using xt3's sports mode 1.25x or manually in post.
@@streetzine Thanks for sharing these notes.
Great,thank you
Welcome! Always nice when viewers appreciate my work.
Thank you Maarten. This was really interesting for me! Still the question for me is: if I have the 55-200, does it make sense to upgrade?
Probably not.
If you want / need weather sealing + closeup shooting, yes. If you want none of those. No.
@@erikfarkas7868 I think you are missing some nuance in your comment.
The teleconverter works with all X mount lenses?
As far as I know both teleconverter work only on compatibel lensens, not all lenses.
No, it does not work with all x-mount lenses. For instance, it does not work with 55-200.. However, it will work with 70-300.
I believe it works with the 80mm macro, 50-140, 100-400 and now the 70-300.
Because it extends into the back of the lens, it's only compatible with some, like the 70-300 and the 50-140.
Thanks for adding this detail.
Great little lens but image qualitywise nothing extraordinary. Won't sell my 50-140 to get this... great review by the way, thanks!
Always nice to know I've provided useful information, thanks for commenting.
The tele works with all X mount lenses? Really? Not true.
Correct. Not true.
I want the 70-300.......
Understood. Now, how to turn your wants into action!
I think they need to incorporate economic video lens so we can benefit from the hight video quality without spending a fortune of money.
The reality is that if your projects are no generating revenue, you'll always find it difficult to fund your interests.
With that background all I heard was blah blah blah blah blah. So picturesque!
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed our snowy day (although it is admittedly a composite created with green screen).
@@MaartenHeilbron You fooled me. Wow I thought that was a window. Thanks Maarten. Always appreciate your videos.
@@jasonlee6848 Thanks. The tip-off should be that the snowflakes are too big - because they're close to the camera.
All well and good but come on Fuji ...give us a GREAT 18-135 ....please!
Are you wanting one at D2.8, F4 or F4-5.6?
@@MaartenHeilbron F4
They already have a good 18-135mm
@@graham_T Well, if you are willing to settle for F3.5-5.6 - bhpho.to/3uus7uG (affiliate link)
Why do you seem like a stage magician? I half-expect you to saw the lens in half then, with a puff of smoke, produce a white dove in its place
An excellent suggestion for my next video, thanks!!