P-47 Thunderbolt Pt. 3 Armor and Protection
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- The top TEN P-47 aces in the Eighth Air Force survived the war. In this video we discuss the design and features that gave the Thunderbolt pilots protection. It's the armor, structure, and a lot more!
The Official auto and Air Fan Store is Here!
gregs-airplane...
Please consider supporting this channel on Patreon: / gregsairplanesandautom...
I served during the Korean conflict.What I do know is that ground crews that were in the my squadron loved the jug as they called,those veterans as well as pilots of the war swore by its rugged construction and toughness.
Most channels like the History channel are full of reality tv. The few documentaries that are being made today are full of cgi and explosions, glossing over details and little known facts.... it’s like people have forgotten how to research. Thank you for making quality content and sharing your knowledge! I’m so lucky they’re about the P-47... my favorite airplane!
I worked on armoring the HumVee, and that system had two layer armor, one called dual hard, and one of composite Kevlar and fiberglass.
The hard armor blunted hard-pointed rounds and the composite caught the pieces and absorbed the kinetic energy
Interesting Jack, thanks for posting.
My father was a six victory (+1 probable) ace in P-38s in the MTO. He did a second tour later in P-47s. Although he loved the P-38, his comment on the P-47 was: "If I had a P-47 the first time around, I would have been a triple ace!" The Luftwaffe pilots in 1943 were still very skilled and knew how to maximize their strengths against our weaknesses. The experienced German pilots would split-S and head vertical for the ground. The early P-38s did not have the dive recovery flaps and could not follow them in the power dive without losing elevator effectiveness. (Compressibility). My dad's next comment was: "No one ever out dove a P-47; that was pure suicide by the enemy pilot....
Thanks for your comment. It's always great to hear such information.
"(Compressibility). My dad's next comment was: "No one ever out dove a P-47; that was pure suicide by the enemy pilot....""
- I may be wrong, but wasn't compressibility also a problem for P-47? I have watched wartime instructional video on flying P-47 and they state the limitations for diving. They seemed rather strict to me... Surely better than P-38 though, but that would be the context of your dad's comment, if I'm understanding it all correctly.
Every aircraft has a Vne( never exceed speed.) This limitation may be due to airframe limitations, controllibility, or who knows.It is just that the P-38 approached that speed faster and earlier than most of its contemporaries. If I remember correctly some P-47s also had "dive recover flaps" to assist with this as well. Anyone?
@@goldcfi7103 Yes, I know that any plane can exceed controllable dive speeds, but the thing with P-47 was that it couldn't recover from powered, vertical dives from 15 000 ft. starting at 250 mph IAS.
That's not much...
Have a look at "How To Fly The P-47 - High Altitude Flight and Aerobatics (1943)" video. Dive speed limits are discussed at around 17:45 min. mark (starts earlier), but the whole movie is some sort of a masterpiece, so worth watching regardless of this topic. Beautiful flying! Your dad could do that too, I guess.
It reminded me of when I've seen a Corsair doing aerobatics right above my head, below 100m for sure. Those guys absolutely rocked! Probably the most impressive display I have seen during the whole airshow. How they got her to Poland, I'm not sure, but they got here and showed everybody how bald eagles do it!
@@bakters Greg covered dive speeds in part 2, check it out.
ruclips.net/video/aCNt3J65UqE/видео.html
Sorry wrong link, the correct one is below
ruclips.net/video/wwP6qv8jOhI/видео.html
It is beautiful to witness how the Internet is working to keep history alive. My dad was a B29 pilot in WWII and my psyche is steeped in early experiences of his frequent living room gab fests with his pilot buddies and being hoisted through the nose hatch of one of those winged war wagons and it's highly organized innards which certainly didn't resemble the living room, in fact imbued me with a love of logic, order and purpose. I congratulate you on this Channel and will hang around for a bit and see what else you got going on here. I often fantasize what it might have been like with my fist wrapped around a control stick in some high altitude field of battle. I'm a WWII junkie and relish explanatory videos such as this. We owe those guys our lives and minds and not a day goes by that I am not thankful for their sense of right and wrong. Don't stop.
Walter
My grandfather Capt. Jay P Green took a Canadian 5" shell through his left wing while returning to base in France and landed with no problem. The picture is lost but I remember seeing him and his crew chief on the wing as a kid.
It’s good to see such a breakdown as the P-47 is one of those planes where many people make the mistake of overemphasizing ‘armour’ rather than construction. The armour did not make it the tough nut it was, in many ways the armour was standard (or even below it) and not special. The construction is what mattered and made it standout. Good point on mentioning that looking at only the return aircraft is risky, survivors bias is a thing.
A few points:
Regarding gun cam footage. These were stored in Dresden and were destroyed in the bombing. Hence a wealth of potential footage vs. P-47s was destroyed. This is also the reason why the same footage is also always looped in all documentaries, sometimes mirrored, zoomed etc. making it seem like different footage. There isn’t anything else left.
Armour plating: The P-47 has, as you mentioned, a standard armour load-out pretty much typical for planes of the time, with a single plate for the pilot, some limited frontal protection and ‘armoured glass’. In a past video I made on this topic I compared it to the Japanese Ki-43 which has a thicker armour plate behind the pilot. As for the hardness, iirc I have seen something on a Japanese test versus a US plate in the Pacific of the same thickness as the P-47D. The Japanese 12.7mm AP rounds managed to penetrate it (although no intervening material/ angle was used affair), while the Japanese claimed their own plates would usually offer comparative protection from this calibre. Working on a project concerning this topic which will come to my channel soon. Will have something more definite then.
Auxiliary armour tends to be armour that isn’t actually ‘armour’. It is not supposed to stop a bullet but rather take its kinetic energy, disfigure the bullet and/or make it change its trajectory. For example, the Bf 109 had a similar thin sheet set about a frame before the armour plate In essence, anything that is between the bullet and the armour could count as this, but auxiliary armour is the stuff that has no other use but this. I am in the office atm (yup, even on NY Eve) so I can’t check for a source atm, but I presume William Wolf or Francis Dean might have something on it regarding the P-47 (?).
Robert Johnson was heavily hit as you said. The initial damage was made by 20mm cannons, this rendered his plane combat ineffective. The second FW190 fired only 7.92mm rounds (probably ran out of 20mm earlier in the ‘same’ fight). In his book Thunderbolt he recounts this. It’s important to make that distinction.
Happy New Year and pardon the British spelling ;)
HI Bismark, thanks for commenting.
I didn't know that's what happened to all the gun camera footage. Yet another reason bombing Dresden wasn't a good idea.
I couldn't find anything meaningful on the Auxiliary armor for the Thunderbolt, other than it being mentioned in couple places, one if which is the parts manual page I put in the video. It would be great if you could find a source. I'm really looking forward to your next video, I think a lot of people are.
It's always tough to figure things out from "encounter" or "after action" reports. R.S. Johnson's 6-26-43 incident is a good example. Even though we have pretty good data on this one, I am just not sure that the second 190 was already out of 20mm. I base this on the statement that Johnson's plane was initially hit from above in a single diving pass. All 21 20mm hit the fuselage. It seems to me that it would be tough to score that many hits, all on the fuselage in a single diving pass. It seems more likely to me that a few were from the second plane, but I am not sure we will ever know. Of course even if the second plane did have 20mm, it clearly didn't have much at the time of the encounter.
History channel claims that the second 190 was piloted by Egon Mayer. I couldn't find any real evidence of that, and I am curious if you have any thoughts on that.
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles I'll check once I get the chance.
It's indeed tough to piece this incident together, even if we have relatively good data on it. 21 hits in a pass would be possible, provided Jerry was a good shot and closing speed wasn't too fast. I seem to remember about half of those were in the wings. Might be that I remember that wrong, have not looked at it too closely in some time. Anyway, FW190As in mid-43 were equipped with up to four 20mm cannons - although some of the variants might still rely on two of the four being the less effective MGFF/Ms. Without knowing who pulled the trigger, we have no idea what exactly was fired down range.
As for Egon Mayer, I don't know. It's possible, then again can be that it's a guess to provide some closure. Mayer didn't make it so there was no way to ask him and since the majority of the files have been lost, it will probably remain a mystery.
I wonder how the P47 structure developed? Was it a philosophy that came out of the Seversky P43 Lancer and earlier P35?
I would assume so, but I do't know for sure.
@Military Avaition History , I reviewed Johnson's book. In it he says that the second plane didn't have any cannon ammo, and that 9 of the 21 20mm did hit the wings. Specifically 5 in the left and 4 in the right. That makes a lot of sense. On Wikipedia it says " damaged by an Fw 190 fighter which fired 21 20 mm cannon shells into his fuselage" WIkipedia doesn't list a source so I think I'll go with Johnson's version. Looks like you remembered correctly :)
The P47 Thunderbolt has a Special place in Brazilian military aviation, in WWII the pilots from Brazilian Air Force ( First Fighter Squadron) received training in US and after that were deployed in the Italian front, main mission was bombing enemy convoys, rail roads, trains and Bridges. They also served as bombers escort (at list one time according a book I read). Very good content in your vídeo! Thank you for upload and share. Have a Great New Year! God Bless! Congratts from Brazil!!!
They are remembered. I grew up in Westhampton Beach, New York, location of Gabreski Airport where they trained. Mom (90 years old) lived near the airport tells stories of the constant flights and occasional crashes (and her high school classmates swooning over the dashing Brazilian pilots...). When I was a boy, we found tarnished .50 cal shell cases in areas that were once firing ranges around the airport. Gabreski commanded the airbase in the early '50s during the transition from P-47s to F-86s.
@@baker2niner Thank you for share this History!
A Brazilian born friend of mine, classmates until high school had told me a story of a neighbor of his who had served with one of the squadrons in Italy. Cannot remember it for the life of me. But Brazilian service during the war especially in the Mediterranean Theater of Operations is admirable nonetheless.
One of my Dad's stories as an Army Air Corp cadet was that a student from Brazil died in a plane crash accident and all the other Brazilian students refused to fly.
1º Grupo de Aviação de Caça or 1º GAvCa
Thanks for the added commentary on Bob Johnson. I read his book cover to cover 12 times as a kid. I think he was a remarkable man.
When I was a kid, I loved the P-47 Thunderbolt. Read all kinds of books relating to this plane, and Pilot Gabby Gabreski became my hero. This pilot and airplane formed my love for ww2 air combat, and desire to join the Air Force.
Rivet You do know there were 200 Germans that had more than Gabreski 25 Brits /Dominions and do you know none flew P47s
Jack Tattis You know why that is right? Basically there was no true combat rotation for Nazi German air crews, and they were fighting the Soviets. You combine the facts of never going home, being in near, constant contact with the enemy, and having a huge number of potentially weak targets to shoot at, and it’s possible to score a lot of aerial victories. Much harder to rack up the count when your primary responsibility is escorting high altitude bombers to a variety of locations, from bases hundreds of miles distant from the enemy. An enemy which has pretty good aircraft and pilot training. By the time Germany didn’t have those things, they didn’t have many aircraft in the air for allied pilots to shoot down.
@@jacktattis143 You do know there was only 1 Ozzie ace that matched Gabreski in WW2 and the rest fell FAR short, yet you Ozzies were supposedly fighting for a lot longer than the U.S. Of course, the majority of Clive Caldwell's victories were flying the U.S.-made P-40 not the Spitfire. However, the P-40 itself shouldn't be blamed for him having the habit of shooting pilots hanging in parachutes.
the "Armor" plate is actually only one plate and has the same characteristics of the front plate, the "face" facing the pilot on both front and rear plates, have 2 sides, one side is armored, the other is not, it has stencilled on it in large letters, "This side facing toward the Pilot", hence why it is numbered 1 & 2
Furthermore, HalfPint was repaired and then sent to the 9th FS, from then on, I have no trace of the aircraft.
I found these details in my research for the P47D-30 which I am rebuilding for the FREE flightsim, www.flightgear.org
So come on and fly with freedom and as many planes as you'd wish to fly, from the Curtiss Jenny to an Airbus A380
I really enjoy your content. Your channel is a hidden gem on youtube
Thank you. Yes it is a bit hidden, but that's OK because it's not for everyone.
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobilesLove your detailed specific content. Absolutely definitive and rare. I learn so much.
@@RemoteViewr1 ditto! Greg's careful explanations of WW2 technical stuff is unmatched.
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles This was good my man. Do the same for others. Axis and Allied. Would be great to learn about other airframes.
Thank you for the P-47 series. This is a real treat not only learning so much about my favorite aircraft from WWII but also that you’re a fellow Oklahoman aviator as well. I’ve seen the painting before but didn’t know the story. How great.
I once read a comment of a wwII pilot that said something like this: want to show off, fly a Mustang, want to come back of every mission, fly a P-47
Roberto J mateau : Not if that role was Ground Attack
@@hoatattis7283 Especially in a ground attack the jug is favorable over the mustang
@Hoa Tattis Imagine how many P-51 they would have lost if they used the P-51 instead of the P-47 for ground attacks.
@Hoa Tattis Your provided data does not help your point at all.
First of all - the maneuverability is not that important if you have air superiority and if you are strafing ground targets. The P-47 is fast enough for that for sure.
Second and most important, the P-51 just cannot sustain damage. The P-47 is way more rugged.
It is a known fact that the P-47 (even if designed as high altitude fighter / escort plane) is a better ground attacker than the P-51 which also shines in high alt.
If you wanna argue that, argue with someone else.
Man, your videos on airplanes are pure gold! Deep document digging and first of all deep UNDERSTANDING of processes and matters you talk about is beyond anything I saw on RUclips or even Discovery or other "serious" TV channel. Well, maybe on par with Ian from Forgotten Weapons, he knows his shit too.
Anyway, thank you and keep up this awesome channel!
Thorneyed Краб, здоров! Где рисовач по Тундроболту (высотным истребителям) и с Новым годом!
I'm glad you mentioned the book "Thunderbolt" by Martin Caiden. I love that book. It's got some great pictures as do his other great books "Flying Forts" and "P-38, The Forked Tail Devil" to add 2 more of my favorite books.
I noticed something my dad showed me one time on a P-47, Being a Crash Crew Fireman at Point Mugu Naval Air Station it came in handy. You can see the feature in a few pics, There's a hole straight thru the Fuselage that is used to pick up the airplane along with the engine mount. Nobody else knew how to pick one up.
I like Martin Caiden. For some reason, he gets a lot of hate in the comment section here, most based on "Samurai!". Overall, I think his stuff is good. He was a real pilot, owned and flew a JU-52 and is accurate far more often than not. An occasional mistake here and there, but that's always true with this stuff.
My paternal grandfather was a Crash Crew Fireman at the Smyrna Air Base near Nashville in WWII. He had nightmares for years after the war from dragging parts of B-24 crews out of the wrecks by student pilots. He wore an asbestos suit and charged right in to try and save those guys.
If those 20mm were "Minengeschoss" rounds. Which is likely, they detontated. Those are basically HE rounds not made for penetrating Amored plates within the aircraft. They are rather ripping large holes in the planes surface.
Hi Sheriff, I always look forward to your comments. You, Barton and Central are my go to channels for sim content. Anyway, I think you are correct. If I were flying an FW190 I would select high explosive rounds and sacrifice the armor penetration for the blast damage. It makes more sense when shooting at things made mostly out of thin aluminum. I also think that the holes aft of the armor plate show the the shells hit at a steep angle and Johnson's report indicates that the fire came from above, which also gives an indication of the angle of the 20mm shells relative to the armor plate, so it could be a combination of factors.
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles The belting of the 20mm was usually not up to the pilot. Basically there was a standard belt afaik. Considering that Fw 190s fighting P-47 were specifically equipped to shoot down planes (B-17s and P-47s) I think we can assume high amounts of Minengeschoss rounds.
However I dont know for sure how the belting was in detail in 1944/45. Pretty sure there are people who know more and have sources.
I agree entirely. It certainly makes sense. Of course I can't speak German (well, I speak enough to order schnitzel, which I plan to do when in Morbach next month), so all the stuff I have read from the German side are the few bigger publications translated into English. I have never seen any mention of just how German ammo was selected, but what you say makes sense. The U.S. pilots did have a certain amount of control over ammo type. For example some avoided use of tracer rounds because when you miss they give away your position.
well if you one day stumble across german docs and you need a translation summary let me know. I'll happily do that.
Perhaps Google Translate might be useful for translations. I haven’t used it extensively, but have had some occasional success.
Greg,
You are the man. I've been involved in general aviation for my entire adult life, and was a WW2 warbird fan since I was a kid. You are definitely one-stop shopping for getting to intimately know the particulars of the aircraft you've covered in your series. Thank you for all your hard work!
plane
This plane is fast becoming my favorite.
The Thunderbolt is my favorite WWII fighter and I have a number of books regarding this plane and Republic Aircraft. I remember reading something like "If you want to impress the girl back home have your picture taken on a P-51 and if you want get back to the girl back home do on a P-47". This might have been form the book " Thunderbolt". Thanks for these great videos.
Not only informative and entertaining but it's also nice to be able to understand the Presenter/Narrator's accent.😁 It's also nice to hear him say "I'm uncertain" and/or "I couldn't verify" etc. instead of making stuff up an presenting his opinions as facts. Nice job, Greg.🙂
All of that is even more amazing seeing as they were assembled on-site
I was an AME [Aviation Structural Mechanic (egress/environmental)] in the US Navy. The systems you're talking about are right up my alley, Think Aviation life support systems. The Navy actually thought about changing our rate to ALSS. AME's and PR's (parachute riggers) were the only rates, I'm aware of, that required a specialized school (A school). We worked closely with the Naval Aviators (read, not pilots). Thank a vet. These men and woman gave it their best.
Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles has added something unique to our RUclips community. Thank you, Greg! Great job!
A few things to consider:
1) 20mm cannon shells fired rather low velocity projectiles with a bursting charge, and were chosen for their destructive capabilities on bombers at very close range. The fact they didn't penetrate the armor, especially after traveling through other parts of the fuselage, isn't terribly surprising.
2) Projectiles tumble quite readily when transitioning from one medium to another. Once destabilized, their penetrative capabilities are essentially nil. Given a well built and rather thickly skinned airframe like the P-47's, the armor is essentially never taking the full force of an incoming round. Look at the effectiveness of the German's Schutzen tank armor upgrades for a clear example.
Take into consideration that any trajectory variation from perpendicular increases the armors relatively thickness, and that speed is the most critical factor in the ability of a projectile to penetrate, and it becomes rather easy to explain why field experiences will differ greatly from blasting at a solitary piece of P-47 armor with an MG 131 at 50 yds.
Oh I guess now I know what to do with 25mins of this sunday.
Thanks Sheriff, and I really enjoy your channel.
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles thx!
I was hoping you’d show up haha
@MIDKNIGHT FENERIR I will be covering that exact topic before this series is done. We are only about 1/2 way through.
Let's say that aside from the Wright Flyer that the P-47 is your favorite airplane for six decades. Then Greg does this. I musta been high.
WW2 ace Chuck Yeager said in an interview that our 50 caliber armor piercing incendiary rounds penetrated into the aircraft and destroyed internal machinery. He said that the German 20mm ammo exploded on the aluminum skin of the plane and did less internal damage.
Your comments about the additional structure including the duct work make perfect sense. We had spaced armor in the tanks and sometimes on the APCs I served on. The concept is the same. The items you mentioned will absorb some energy as well as redirect some of the energy/direction of travel of the round. I was always of the opinion that I'd rather have something, anything, between me and a round than nothing.
I read all I can on ww2 fighters, but the p47, I love!!! People say its ugly, but in the air, with its big wings it looks graceful!!
Watched an episode of Wings I think it as that had a P-47 pilot, Simmons or Simpson, was nursing his damaged plane from a previous attack when German Ace Myers spotted him alone. The P-47 survived 3 strafings. Myers pulled up, shook his head, waved and left. His FW 190 was out of ammo.
That was Robert S. Johnson.
On the German 20mm shell and the Bob Johnson P-47, I saw somewhere that they tend to choose explosive and/or incendiary shells, not armor piercing ones. The reason is that it was discovered early in the war, that opening roles on the enemy's fuselage was much more effective than to make a shell go through the enemy armor, since it may or may not hit something important.
I agree 100%, The Sim Sheriff make the same remark, so you are in good company.
Think of the drag that such a hole creates
@@martijn9568 Indeed. Imagine the difficulty of flying with one or more big holes on your wing. It should make you a siting duck in a dogfight.
At least one P-38 pilot claimed his 20 mm gun was loaded with explosive shells and when they recovered "Glacer Girl" they took out its its 20 mm cannon and fired at a 55 gallon drum blowing it apart with a single shot with an explosive shell.
Good video. I'm gaining a greater appreciation for the 47 with each episode.
I can imagine the survivability conversation with the B-17 crews ‘The P-47 is very heavy and very strong to protect the pilot so that he can protect you better’
‘I see, but can it fly with us for the whole mission’
‘No it doesn’t have the range for that’
‘Right, in that case we prefer the P-51’
You might want to watch the rest of the series, especially episode 6.
My Dad worked on P 47's during WWII and had stories that impressed me about the durability of the 47. He observed planes landing with large trees named in the wings. And they all made it home safely. What a tough plane.
2400 lost in the G/A role never made it home It should never have been used in that role It was too large and not manoeuvrable enough
Well done, thorough: the source drawings/documents/testimony is greatly appreciated. Thank you for sharing.
So... you like the thunderbolt?
I sure do, your videos are great, I'm not joking when I say these videos should be in national archives, you're doing a historian's work.
Thanks Birdy. I do like the Thunderbolt, but I like a lot of planes. I am just focusing on the Thunderbolt for the first in the series because it allows me to cover a lot of the major principles we will be using in the future, and all in one airplane, i.e. supercharging, turbocharging, fuel injection, mach numbers, tail warning radar, etc.
Thanks Greg for the quick response. I am a docent at the PS Air Museum and I have one of these beasts in my (European Theater) hanger, along with a still flying P-51 in Red Tail Sq colors. I just love the comparison that I can now afford visitors due to your videos. Also, quite possibly I am alive today because of a briefly clear sky above Bastogne when my father was on the ground getting ready to be overrun by some tanks....then along came a squad of P-47s....
Thanks for your comments. I haven't been to the museum in Palm Springs, but I hope to get there one day. I have flown over it, it's more or less under one of the arrivals into Ontario.
Hub Zemke in his book "Zemkes wolf pack" told of taking a cannon round that killed the engine. He had a lot of altitude, and figured he could make it most of the way to the channel. When he got into heavier air, the aircraft started up and he flew back to base, no problems. The cannon round had holed the duct work for the pressure side of the turbo, and the engine didn't have the oxygen to run.
oxegen
hehe
There was an interesting study done during WWII by the brits (I think). A group was tasked to try and stem the massive bomber losses (1943/44?) and so they started surveying battle damage to the aircraft that returned. Lets say for statistical purposes they broke the airframe up into zones when counting hits. Overwhelmingly over the span of a month surveying a couple of hundred airframes it emerged for example that Zones A and C were getting plenty of hits, Zone D about 50% less and Zone B next to none. A recommendation was made to armour plate Zone B. The Bomber Command initially questioned this advice - surely - if A and C were receiving the hits then that is where the armour needed to be (seems logical). The answer is even more logical - the surveys were completed on planes that made it BACK to the UK after their mission. Clearly, the planes were still capable of flying if hit in A,C, and to a lesser extent D. The fact that there were only a few with hits to Zone B that made it back showed that your odds of making it back to the UK were slim if you got hit there. Ergo the 'odd' decision.
Bismark has a good video on that exact subject: ruclips.net/video/B3YQJ5DwTzM/видео.html
Fantastic logic, thanks
This is similar to the studies on helmet effectiveness in wwi.
Studies showed an enormous increase in head wounds at the hospitals once helmets were issued.
This seemed counterintuitive until it was realized that before helmets were issued many of those wounds were never counted as such. They didn’t make it to the hospitals. They’d been fatalities.
The same logic was applied to the B29's that returned from bombing missions over Japan. The B29's that returned did not show damage from being hit in the engine nacelles. Engineers installed armour to protect the B29's engines and the survivability did increase significantly on those missions.
The two armor plates talked about in the first part of the video. I have no source but my theory is, there are indeed two stacked plates. Maybe there's two plates instead of one because the rear plate is made of a different more expensive, better quality metal. Maybe the two type metal plate combo was a compromise between protection and weight over just increasing the thickness of the original plate with the same metal.
Didn't the 51 drivers used to say that the 47 drivers idea of taking evasive action was to get out of the seat and run around the cockpit?
@@Moelders109 I am reminded of the similar contention between F-15 and F-16 drivers, with F-16 drivers referring to the F-15 as the "Great Prehistoric Bird Rodan" and cartoons showing an F-15 with a pair of F-16s slung as underwing ordnance.
Systems redundancy, quality components, well thought out and proven design. Very resistant to catastrophic failure from virtually any cause.
Many a pilot owed his life to this tough old bird.
"This P-47 landed on a 500lb bomb and the pilot survived". I don't even have words. I love the P-47, not sure how good of a fighter it was but it certainly does a few things obscenely well.
Olivia : As a fighter it was very good as a Ground attack not so good
@@skyscall 3 years late, but if you've watched Gregg's next videos of the p47, that's not really true. The introduction of the paddle prop and 2800 hp upgrade in 1944 made the p47 competitive in a climb with the latest german fighters. Hell, USAAF ace Robert S. johnson mentions in his diary just how much perfomance the paddle prop added to the p47 in terms of climb performance. That is certainly true in earlier p47 variants, but not at all true in 1944 towards the end of the war in 1945. The plane continued to improve and was a force to be reckoned with. To say it was a mediocre fighter is false, it did most of the heavy lifting in the European theater before the merlin powered p51's arrived in large numbers. Again, watch Gregg's later videos on it, he discusses climb performance and maneuverability
Great vid. You can be sure I'll hunt up the rest of them on the P-47s and then start on the rest.
Years ago I read voraciously every book on WWII fighter pilots that I could lay my hands on. Here's some bits and pieces I remember that you might find amusing.
-Immediately after WWII, the Russians getting difficult to deal with, LeMay withdrew the 51s and reintroduced P-47s for the projected ground attack role.
-An episode (I think in Tumult in the Sky) was related that it was a court marshalling offense for a pilot to have a woman in BOQ room. The base commander made an unannounced inspection and as luck would have it, knocked and entered the room of his top ace and watched two women trying desperately to exit the room by the far window.
At the end of the inspection the base commander mused aloud that the rule was one woman, nothing was said about two.
Mr lemonbaby : I am sure that the P47 in the Ground Attack role would not have worried the Russians
Afterall the usaaf LOST 2400/2600 IN THAT ROLE
I agree that the book “Thunderbolt!” is a fantastic read. I especially like how the author explains why certain upgrades helped him in combat. As always, thank you for this great series on a legendary aircraft.
Fantastic vid on the jug!!!! My father flew 104 missions with the 358thfg and went through 7 planes without a scratch. The jug definitly protected the pilot!!!!!!!
Thanks Scott.
One other thing about the turbo charger of the 47. Crew chiefs learned never to leave the turbo intake side doors open on the fuselage when parked. Birds had the tendency to build nests right on top of the turbos. So in flight the nests would catch fire, often causing the pilot in flight panic, a return to base and in one case loss of the 47. I do not have a complete breakdown of the rear armor plate system and dimensions, but in front of the main armor plate, there is a secondary plate which the seat is mounted too. This plate does not exceed the seats height but does exceed the width. When I can find in my 47 library the exact breakdown, I'll let you know. Maj. Robert S. Johnson seems to be a forgotten USAAF Ace. For some reason he was given the moniker "Lone Wolf" and even a few of his exploits{the tangle with the Fw early in his career} and a confirmed Fw kill { the 28th}was taken from him. In the book "Called to Command" Gen. Gerald Johnson referred to the early Fw encounter as made up and false. Of course that claim was made after Bob was deceased. The 28th kill was taken from him by the winers from 4th F.G., claiming that, since no-one witnessed the Fw {which disappeared into the clouds in flames} crash it is just a probable. Blakeslee hoped that one of his 51 pilots would eventually surpass both Johnson and Gabreski. "Shorty" Rankin {Bob's last wingman} has always claimed Bob Johnson was the best Fighter pilot he had ever flew with and he{Shorty} flew with all the best of the 56thFG. One final note, 4th Fg was the only group that wanted aircraft destroyed on the ground counted as equal to air to air kills in the tally. That's why Capt. George Preddy's score is so exaggerated on his 51. 8th AF Fighter command said no. Blakslee again cried, as usual. Enjoyed the vid immensely and looking forward to all the forthcoming on the 47. Thanks!
That's a great post. I never heard about the bird nest issue, but it makes perfect sense. Birds are always trying to next in airplanes and the 47's intercooler doors probably look really inviting. I do think Robert S. Johnson's is largely forgotten and under rated.
Interesting; one thing I had learned is that the 4th FG was so 'enamored' with their Spitfires as former 'Eagle Squadron' flyers, the Group Command REALLY hated the P47 and the feeling 'leaked down' to the rank & file. As for Johnson, he was always considered a 'disciplinary case' because of his willingness to break away from group formation to make solo attacks against enemy aircraft-not so much 'lone wolf' as 'hot dog'; in any case the 56th was the only group of the first three US Fighter groups to 'start out' with the P47; the 4th loved their spits and the 78th was supposed to fly P38s but they got taken from them (to give the US fighter groups in Tunisia to make up for combat losses) and they ended up with P47s in England, and were not quite 'sure' of the plane.
Huh, Yet Hub{56th FG Commander} made him {Bob Johnson} Squadron Commander of the 62 FG. Interesting. @@nickmitsialis
Hub just cared about combat results and was willing to overlook certain 'peculiarities'...besides, Zemke was kind of a 'pistol' too. ;-)
Or maybe Bob Johnson was just a plain old "Hot stick" or "Big Wheel", a great flight leader and Squadron Commander? Zemke wasn't a "Pistol" he was often referred to by 8th AF Fighter Command as the best commander, with excellent pilot skills, combat ability, command authority and a calm deposition. Which they wish they could get out of Blakslee. Hub had such a positive and lasting influence on his men that even Robin Olds{who flew with Hub} named his F-4 group in Vietnam the "Wolfpack"?. So obviously you know nothing about "Hub" Zemke, Bob Johnson, or the 56th FG. @@nickmitsialis
and Gregs god bless the ground crews that kept these fantastic fighters in the sky
Fantastic work as always! Behind the FW-190, the P-47 is probably my favorite aircraft of the war.
I know one thing, the flying skill of WW2 pilots was simply amazing. They were constantly flying with other planes in close formation. There was almost no autopilot functions used in the formations they flew in. They were amazing. I salute them. They also had to manage the engine, there were no computers taking care of things for them.
As time proceeds what was the best becomes obsolete and then when there are no more they become priceless.Those wonderful planes from the wooden wonder to the blackbird an many between.
great post Gregs i love to learn about p-47 p 38s and ENGLISH MOSQUITO three great planes that do not get the recognition they deserve god bless all the guys that flew them we owe them so much
I agree that the Mosquito doesn't get the recognition is deserves, neither does the P-38. I'll cover both in the future.
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles THANK YOU FOR THE REPLY Gregs look forward to the posts god bless the USA
This stuff is pure gold. Thank you for your hard work putting these videos together.
TY Greg. My friend is named Greg, and when he comes over he says "Greetings!"
the extensive rear fuselage structure and ducting of the P-47 can cause even 20mm rounds to begin to tumble and lose most of their penetrating power by the time they reach the actual armor plate...effectively a spaced armor concept
Thanks for your very informative third video on my favorite fighter. One additional thing about the P-47 armor was that the head protection plate was angled forward on the bubble top to aid in deflection. I'll bet Johnson would have appreciated that feature in the razorback version that he flew against the 190. That was his first combat mission by the way. I remember reading his memoir of that event. He said that all he could do was to crank his seat down as far as possible and wait it out. I remember he said that he had his wrist watch shot off and that he tried to bail out when the plane was on fire, but couldn't because the sheet metal damage (shown by your photo) kept him from sliding the canopy back more than six inches. You can see in your photo that the side plexi-glass panel of the canopy was removed after his crash landing (after running into some parked Spitfires because the loss of hydraulic fluid left him with no brakes) allowing him to get out of the cockpit. This, by the way, is why we must keep these warbirds flying to honor these great men who flew them and there dedicated ground crews who kept them flying. One other potential hazard of the P-47 was that the pressurized return air from the supercharger had to pass through the cockpit to the engine. I did my flight training at the Spartan school of aviation in Jenks, OK in the 1970's right next to your home town of Tulsa. An old flight instructor there did some test flying of the P-47 during the war and said it was a concern, but never heard of it causing any damage. You can see these return ducts on your photo of the guys doing maintenance on a jug.
Very good article. Keep up the good work!
That was not his first combat mission. In previous mission(s) he would break formation. he got his ass chewed, and in this mission he was determined to stay where he belonged. Being in the tail of the flight he was jumped by the 190.
Kevin Schreur You're probably right about it not being his first combat mission, perhaps I read that maybe it was his first dogfight. I do remember that he was "tail end Charlie" and that his radio was not functioning so he couldn't warn the others of the incoming German planes. I remember writing a letter to Republic Aircraft in the early 60's asking for drawings of a P-47 to help with a model I was building. Robert Johnson replied to my letter with a cutaway drawing and said he hoped it would help. He had obviously landed a PR job with Republic. He was a great guy and always one of my heroes.
@@intrepid2011 "Robert Johnson replied to my letter with a cutaway drawing"
- Do you have it framed? I'd do it for sure.
Possible answer for the auxiliary armor; In armor vehicles we would often have a thin sheet of steel spaced before/ exterior the main armor. This would break up an impacting round and by having the space it could not carry it's kenetic energy directly into the main armor plate. Great effectiveness with less material. Similarly we would often have a "spall liners" inside. This was a sort of sheet of kevlar or similar material to catch pieces of steel from the armor itself which could break away and go flying through the interior of the vehicle, even from the impact of a round which didn't penetrate.
I first read "Thunderbolt" when I was eight, at the beginning of a four-week long family road trip vacation. It hooked me completely, made me forever interested in military history. So much so that I used a fair bit of the money I'd saved up for souvenirs to purchase a book on Midway along the way.
ABSOLUTELY OUTSTANDING! Greg, I gotta stand and applaud you here... You are definitely an encyclopedia of knowledge and consummate WW2 warbird researcher - with a flair for masterful storytelling to boot. I fly RC warbirds for fun and you have clearly demonstrated in this series that the Republic P-47s were some badass planes! GREAT CHANNEL!
Republic was always very well built, and thus quite heavy in comparison.
But; I always said when people ask; "what if you were a fighter pilot during WW2, what aircraft do you want to fly?"
While others talk about the P-51 or Spitfire or any other more nimble and famous fighter, I always maintained I rather fly a Jug; the p-47 always gave you the best chance of getting back home, air cooled engine and a strong build with good protection. More than one pilot survived a harsh landing due to the supercharger arrangement and the ducted channels working like a modern deformation zone on a car.
Regarding ammunition and armour piercing I am not exactly an armourer but I used to clear unexploded ammunition and aircraft prefer to use nose fused high explosive high sensitive ammunition over armour piercing, that would only be on dedicated tank busting operation you choose an armour piercing round for an aircraft mounted automatic cannon.
If you were going for survivability, the P-39 or B-26 might give you better odds.
This is just a terrific half hour. Love the technical details. Keep going. Add as much stuff as appeals to you as you wish. There does not seem to be many of us who like the actual details. We should encourage each other as much as possible. Cheers.
Thanks. I know these topics are not that popular, and youtube doesn't really like it either (they demonetized this video within 3 mins of its release), however the relatively small group that does like this stuff are really into it, and a great bunch of people. Just look through the comments here!
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles Now you really have my attention. Why in the name of God would they wish to demonetise this ? And secondly,within 3 min ? Huh ? I would be beyond furious, enraged instead. Controlled but enraged. Any content as to why,actual explanations,Greg or others please wade in. Not speculation,content. As to why.
No explanation at all as to why the demonetized this one, it's the only one they have demonetized so far.
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles Bizarre. We make jokes about machining porn,gun porn,model railroad porn, etc. I am going to follow up on this till I can communicate with a human. Find out what the latest alibi is. Maybe wait till after Jan 1,but find out I will. Irked.
Wow... some of that battle damage. Certainly was a tough aircraft. Yep, you're not going to be shooting the wings off that in a single pass.
Absurd design, shouldn't have worked -- but it did, remarkably so.
Excellent, balanced video.
6:41 Auxiliary Armor provides supplementary or additional help and support. (Source: Dictionary)
ie, it's some bulk item to dampen fragments from slowed/burst shells if it is rearward of the armor plate it supports, or it is a spall liner if forward. If it is merely spaced armor, it could be on either or both sides. It's probably just a flack vest-like, or other utility thing like a seat back though.
As far as german ww2 planes go the f.w 190 is my favorite, after watching the first 3 videos on this fighter i think i found my new favorite American ww2 fighter, i love the graphs and pics of assembly diagrams, everytime i go into auto parts stores i still flip through chiltons repair manuals just to see how they put different things together..
Thanks Satch, I'm glad you like the videos.
Quentin Annenson wrote a book made into a PBS documentary called A Fighter Pilot's Story. Excellent film and a great inspiration of a man.
Hey. I can fully respect the fact you referred to Chuck Hawks. Man, oh man.
Chuck's guides are the best. Even if you don't fly on DCS they are great.
I had never, ever, heard of the tail radar on the P-47! With autopilot and the EWS, the airframe design and power plant, it was an amazingly advanced plane for the time!
Thanks Greg. I was oblivious to the 47 and its superior design and performance until now!
Spent my lunch yesterday watching this video. Certainly made that time much more enjoyable. Most informative as always.
Mechanical designer with MTO experience here. It looks like they doubled up on the rear plate. So that would be two 3/8" plates for a total of 3/4" of armor in the rear. That has a fair chance of stopping .50 caliber rounds.
Another great video from you. Very nice Greg. Can't wait for the next one. Thx for upload! :D
Greg - Happy New Year ! And thanks for all your hard work making this video. I can tell it is a labor of love - but still - I see a ton of work and extreme devotion to the subject matter as well as Ground Truth. It's totally appreciated. I love how you gave the turbocharged Pratt & Whitney R-2800 it's due regard as the heart of the Thunderbolt, a sword in the hands of an aggressive airman like Johnson and capable of shielding bullets away from that man. Many of them hauled on home with entire cylinders missing (blown clean through the cowling) and their connecting rods flailing away out in the breeze. Corsair pilots also sang the praises of the mighty Double Wasp as a true mechanical ally in the struggle to win or at least survive Air Combat.
PS - At 1:32 AM CST 1/1/2019 the counter shows 666 thumbs up and ZERO THUMBS DOWN.
Been watching RUclips since 2004 and I have never seen that before !
Great episode 👍
I saw a P-47 in Seattle ,it was a beast of an airplane. Great technical information 👌.
Thanks for another great and very technical video on WW2 aircraft
Greg thank you for a wonderful series of videos, solid data and knowledgeable commentary is so refreshing.
Very good information, well done! An old friend flew Spitfires during the war. He reckoned a Spit was indestructible until he pulled the wings off one in a dive! To be a fighter pilot you need absolute confidence in the airframe. Any hesitation in performing a maneuvre and you will die. I understood this when I began chucking planes around. The Thunderbolt would have been a favourite in the war, it was so well constructed.
Yes and he pulled that wing off at what Tactical Mach
P47 death dive 0.73 F/O OShea 0.88 AFDU Duxford in a Spitfire MkXI
The P47 were banned from having mock Fights with the Spitfire below 8000ft They lost 4 in quick succession trying to turn with the Spitfire IX Source: 2 Lt Ervin Miller ex Eagle Sqn when he was transitioning from Spits to P47s.
So it has always been a fallacy that any P47 could beat the Spitfire in Climb, Roll , Dive ,. Acceleration, Service Ceiling.
The American TigerTank of the Air ... ( plus 8 .50's) ...
My Christmas present, thanks Greg!
Very informative and interesting video about the P47....It was one hell of a tough sucker. not to mention a very dangerous adversary...
Really like your work. Excellent video and thank you for sharing.
I read "somewhere" that when RAF fighter pilots first saw a P-47 they were mislead by its chunky appearance and assumed it would be an easy kill for the slim and lethal 109s - they said it was a good thing the plane was so tubby since it would give the pilot a chance to "dodge about" inside to avoid MG and cannon fire.
I would like to add a small contribution to this episode. Deflection from many points of contact, however that send the munition (think ricochet) in a plethora of directions plus the pieces of the aircraft flayling (deflecting) about. JMR
I think I read something about a Brazilian WWII pilot in Italy, when his wingman was straffing a train station and hit a ammo deposit, he went through the flames and during the recovery the wing separeted
That could be. WW2 was so vast that almost anything that could have happened did at some point. The greater point I was making is that the P-47's wings are very well secured and less likely to come off than most if not all other fighters.
Fantastic, thank you.
Holy crap that plane is tough.
Greg, thanks so much for these awesome videos. They are a great addition to all the books I've been reading lately about WWII air combat and have satisfied many of the more technical questions that come to mind while reading them. I really can't tell you how much I appreciate your work. Keep it up!
I just wanted to note that according to the American Air Museum in Britain website, 'Half Pint' (41-6235), Bob Johnson's P47C that made it back to base after absorbing a ton of damage, was not scrapped afterward, but was rebuilt and transferred to the 36th Fighter Group. It was apparently lost in combat over France on 13 August 1944. I haven't verified this independently yet, but if true, it's an even greater testament to the amazing durability of the P-47. Just an incredible aircraft.
I'm glad you like my videos.
So in case anyone (other than Greg!) might actually read these comments, I thought I'd note that the above information is sourced from Roger Freeman, which to me speaks in favor of the truth of it. And maybe I'm just late to the party here, but Gerald W. Johnson's combat report of 6/26/43 seems to contradict Robert Johnson's account. Unless another pilot had a similar encounter on the same day (God knows how many P-47s were flying over France that day), it seems reasonable to assume that Robert Johnson's account may have been exaggerated a bit and perhaps 'Half Pint' did not sustain as much damage as one might suppose. The surviving pictures of the aircraft in question that I've seen aren't exactly comprehensive. Is there any kind of repair report? If anyone has dug into this further, please comment here so I can see it. I'm not the kind of guy that gets any pleasure from suggesting a real hero (in his own estimation) might be padding the truth; it's an interesting story either way. But an elusive truth is sometimes difficult to resist!
Thank you for another informative video. Several years ago I built the Trumpeter P-47N and during my research of the subject I came to the conclusion that the P-47 was probably a better all around fighter than the P-51, with the exception of range of course. Your fascinating series just reinforces my opinion.Had the Air Force OK'ed Republic's larger fuel carrying wings sooner there may have never been a Merlin powered Mustang, there would have been no need for it.
Greg, absolutely great video series. Love it!
absolute gem of a series thanks looking forward to the next one
In an autobiography I read about a P-47 commander, he told all his pilots that the seat armour could stop a 50 cal bullet.
He wasn't sure, so secretly he fired some 50 cal rounds into a P-47 seat. The rounds went thru the seat with ease, but he didn't tell any of his pilots about the test.
That's probably true. The only common WW2 fighter I know of that had armor that could was the Corsair, and then only at very specific angles. A 50 cal at short range, say 300 meters or less will punch through anything in the sky.
5:30 '...the pilot is further protected by... the fuel tank'.
I'm sure they were real happy to hear that!
It's true. It does sound strange, but a self sealing tank is a tough thing to shoot through.
@@GregsAirplanesandAutomobiles No doubt; I would suspect it would act like those bullet traps the FBI uses for rifling comparison (I wonder how many rounds they found inside the tanks throughout the war?)
I still imagine there were some raised eyebrows on the first day of orientation!
I don't know if you covered this yet , The P-47 was shipped in a large box and could be
assembled using the shipping box , simple hand tools and a number of men ...in a field.
I smashed the thumbs up button with glee. Happy New Year.
Thanks Ron. I did cover the shipping and assembly a bit in Part 1.
WOW! I live and work in Sand Spring on the edg of Tulsa. A gentleman named Gene Sawyer let me read a book that he had that was about a friend of his that was a P-47 pilot in World War II. Well needless to say I read that book. It was a total shock to just hear that on your video and to find out that you live in Tulsa I love your Channel. So keep up the great work.
Wow, thanks Michael. We are neighbors, I am in Sapulpa, just north of Route 66!
I’ve always loved the P-47, the P-39 and the P-38 for aesthetic reasons in addition to their technical merits.
Their design came out of the 1930s era of streamlining with beautiful rounded curves. Which is excellent for smooth subsonic airflow.
They all looked sexy in the air.
The P-39 was the ultimate example until they ruined it with the vertical stabilizer in the P-63.
The bubble canopy P-47 is a close second only because of the vertical stabilizer/ fuselage junction.
The tail of the P-38 is a work of art. Look how the sexiness was removed later in the P-61 tail design.
Engineers were learning about intersection drag, clipped wings and other important aerodynamic advances.
But the airplanes designed later in WWII just weren’t as sexy.
The B-26 and even the B-29 exhibited a lot of the same sexy curved aesthetics.
Great video and very informative. Greg's voice and lack of accent and loud terrible music makes this video very enjoyable to watch and listen to. Very Well Done Greg. Thank you. All of your videos are First Class.
Thank you.
Thank you very well done, This presentation answered a lot of P-47 internal structure questions and their Whys.
Thank you
13:48 this is true in online play in GB (BoX) series games, 80-90% of planes downed dont even see you untill you either hit them, miss and they notice traicers or destroy them in first pass. Having good SA online keeps you alive long time, having bad SA and you think everyone is just showing up on you 6 from nowere :D
I’d be very interesting to see Greg research a piece on the comparative manufacturing costs of the top WW2 planes. I know the Spitfire was supposed to be twice the cost of a 109 for fairly obvious reasons. The P47 double again I’d have guessed. Of course this is all academic. It made a huge difference to the Germans, but not much to the ‘muricans. But it would make an interesting study.
I actually made that video comparing the cost of the P-38 to the Mosquito, it has some other stuff in there too, but I haven't released it yet.