You guys and girls are so quick at getting water on to the fire, Firefighters in the US would have stood around looking at it for 10min, so glad you are the ones looking out for us in the UK
No we would have stretch two 1 3/4 interior lines in less than 2 minutes been prepared to open the roof, setup positive pressure which would have helped keep the fire out of the building. Put an additional exposure line on the neighbors house. Cranked up the deck gun and knocked the RV fire out in 1 minute. No interior fire fighting at all in the video they let the fire breached the roof then dumped tons of water on the attic. Waste!. Oh yeah are all your lined rolled up we have 4 attack line skids mid ship a 5 inch supply line and 3 large attack lines equipped with small blitz water monitors and 2 1/2 fog or smooth bore nozzles. So to you who try to make fun of US tactics come ride with us we will show you how to do the job.
you couldn't be more wrong about U.S. firefighters. They're some of the best in the world. I've witnessed these firefighters firsthand, and they would put these Brits, to shame.
Being a tad 'old school' my view of this is somewhat different. It was clear that the roof of the property was being affected by the vehicle fire and this could be seen by the crews on arrival. I've been retired now for 25 years but I would have had a BA crew up in the loft with a hosereel immediately after getting water on to that vehicle fire. This would have prevented fire spread in the structure and saved a whole lot of grief for the owners. I saw little point in setting up the ground monitor just to wash the roof along with the 3 other jets I counted. The fire was inside, not outside. Still, at least everyone got to wear a tabard. If that's how fires are approached these days and this is brigade policy then so be it. I'll go back to sleep. 😂😂
@@COMPUTERGAMESPS5 Good question. Close coupled roof construction can be problematic in fires. Those spiked plates hammered in that join together the spars are an aluminium alloy. Aluminium melts at around 660°C, fires generally burn around 900°C to 1100°C so there is a probable/possible loss of stability. In the early stages of an incident, however, which this was, whilst it is a consideration, it shouldn't limit the Incident Commander's actions in mitigating the damage to the property.
ive watched a lot of these type of video's and i came up with the idea of a hoistable fire blanket that you could put between properties that could activate when there's a fire. i don't know if that's a good invention or not some day.
I'm always impressed how quickly UK firefighters get water on a fire compared to USA, who take 5 to 15 minutes, shame you held the camera the wrong way round though
What are you talking about ???? 35 seconds to get water on the fire. That was impressive. Did you not read the message properly ??????? @@Redrose-zc7hj
Urgency wasn't there if they look at the footage very slow water pressure very bad at first probably lost three homes wen really should of only been a camper van.
5 to 15 minutes???? Are you saying in the US once crews arrive on scene it takes them 5-15 minutes to get water on the fire??? Is that what your saying?????
I see alot of comments on here knocking us fire departments and comments about uk firefighters at the end of the day you all do the same job no matter where in the world you are and I daresay in each country things are done differently! But you are all brothers the world over no matter where you come from! Firefighters of every country you di a great job much respect and admiration to you all!
Fantastic response from the fire service, well done to all the emergency response teams who attended the call, and well done to the camera operator for capturing all the action and fast response of the crews involved.
Thank you Billy, we too own a Motorhome, and it sits on our driveway. I took the video, to highlight just how quickly, fire can spread. I'm so glad, that no one was injured. Cheers Steve
I to have a caravan in my driveway very close to my house. My neighbour also has one in their driveway that separates our vans by about 1.5 meters. How quickly you can lose everything. Great work by the fire crews protecting the exposures and nice handy work by the cameraman. Cheers from Australia 🇦🇺
1 minute and water on the fire. Good job, lads, and lasses stay safe they should not be keeper so close to houses they spread to quickly when fire starts
Wow. That was one angry fire!! The rate it spread too. Bet the neighbours were glad (sort of) that they are detached houses!! Camera man. Not a bad job but still need practice before you land that job at the BBC!! 😂
Great work by the guys at the Scottish Fire & Rescue Service. Our heart goes out to the residents that were caught up in this incident, thankfully nobody was understood to have been seriously injured or in need of any frontline medical care Steve. The explosion pops that you can hear in the background which was previously thought by some to be aerosol cannisters is actually that of solar lithium batteries exploding although at those temperatures inside the property anything that is combustible is potentially very much not immune to exploding. Although the extent of the damage to the roof & guttering is the least of anyones worries sadly not to mention the solar system and that's just for starters sadly. Really hope all concerned are fully insured, really sad watching someone's personal property being destroyed by fire although it could have been alot worse! 4:08 The fire fighter who is running to the end of driveway is gesturing to his colleague to increase the pressure of the water.
Não achei muito inteligente eles gastarem todo o tempo e a preciosa água só molhando o telhado por fora enquanto o fogo tava lá dentro da casa destruindo tudo. Eu acho que primeiro tinha que quebrar os vitros e as portas e ia direto nos focos do fogo 🔥.
@@melania3228 Trzeba przyznać, że to nie do końca Liga Sprawiedliwości, więc bądźmy uczciwi i realistyczni, chociaż zawsze można poprawić czas reakcji, słuszna uwaga Malenia!
Amazing what you can do with one appliance and a well trained crew. This as a nasty fire, well done to the guys and girls in their professional approach.
They never attacked the house fire... they sprayed water on the roof & walls as opposed the actual seat of the fire Which is why the fire continued on the inside, spread throughout the house, and the roof collapsed You have to actually get water on the fire to stop it.
Interesting on seeing the variations in fire ground tactics from other countries. In California the response and initial attack would have been completely different, but would most likely would have had the same end results. Glad no one was hurt, and sad to see such loss!
Well said, other countries should watch this video and learn by it, water on flames is good rather than just standing watching as the property burns down, and did you see how fast they had the first water on after arrival, well done to everyone involved.
@@ffjsb well they didn't burn the house down but they all did try and save it, didn't see any of the crews just standing watching it burn like you see in other videos, it was the initial response and attack response I was referring to, so again, well done all crews.
At least they had water on it in under 20 seconds of arriving. Not waste precious time screw around like most house fire video. Great work men and woman firefighters. That house was a complete burn down ,the best they could do was save the neighbors houses and they did
I’m not a fireman nor do I know the policy of this brigade but all I can say is jolly well done and they deserve more than a pat on their shoulder. Thanks for your hard work and dedication to the job. Stay safe and stay awesome.
im really lucky to live within a 4 min drive of the fire station (including traffic), i had a house fire when i was like 15, i was walking home from school and i just had a bad feeling as soon as the fire engines went past and as i got to my road i saw lots of smoke but luckily it wasnt all bad news as everyone was okay and we lived with our aunt for a few months and our house was A okay
I am glad I am not the only one thinking they delt with this fire wrong. In the states there are a great many departments that fight fires from the outside of the building. Indeed they are proud of this tactic. The departments that follow this philosophy tend to be suburban departments and on the more well to do side, income wise. They feel that the home owners have insurance for a reason, building new buildings is good for the economy and fewer firefighters get hurt fighting the fire on the outside of the building than on the inside. (I am certain that the cost savings in this has absolutely no impact on this policy.) There are also departments that lack the manpower to get aggressive with their firefighting, though this does not appear to be the case in this clip.
Speed is irrelevant if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt, and is why the house was lost Spraying water onto a roof does nothing to put out the fire underneath it, which you can actually watch here They are pouring water onto the roof which quickly flows right off Meanwhile you can see the fire underneath do nothing but grow and spread The only time they got water into the interior is after the roof collapsed And even that water wasnt very effective
Bloody hell that’s a nasty one. That’s someone’s possessions and memories gone up in smoke. All one can hope for is that everyone got out safely. Pretty shocking fire.
@@thatcatboabIt should be law to have full Building and Contents insurance for a property in the UK ? Unfortunately it's not compulsory. Which I think is a stupid written law.
So, quick response, immediate initial protection of exposures, quick work to establish water supply and effective use of this thereafter. Great work. If this was in the USA they would still be pulling houses and smashing windows with no water well after the video ended, and 3 houses lost. Not this country
You CLEARLY have ZERO knowledge of what you're talking about. While it takes slightly longer to get water from a preconnected hand line, a small 1" reel flows very little water. They are making almost NO headway into this fire with that small line, and NO ONE has on SCBA initially.
FFJSB you have no clue at all. Whilst they hook up to a hydrant they are not only able to attack the fire with what they have instantly at hand but can cool the neighbouring property and prevent it spreading to there too. US firefighters would still be running around trying to look good and by the time they were ready to fight the fire the houses either side of this fire would be engulfed.
Wow alot disdain for American firefighters it seems . Apparently you Brits cant get over your own supposed superiority complex. Aren't you're firefighters the ones who tell people to stay in a burning building. See over here our firefighters want to save our lives and tell us to get the hell out no matter how small the fire is. Until you actually know more about the way American firefighters are trained and what the priorities at a fire scene are best to keep your insults to yourself.
High pressure hose reels give rapid attack on small fires (flow 58 US gallons/min.) using the on-board 1,800 litre tank. Often can extinguish small fires especially on vehicles. In this case it had gone way over that as Alloa fire station is 4.3 miles travel distance.
Amazing work yet again. I've watched lots of vids like this and I get frustrated to see the American fire fighters take do long to get water on. It's almost like they say too late let it burn.
Not true at all it depends on the fire conditions and first arrival size up how long the fire has been burning how far the crews have to travel to get there and with how inconsiderate some idiots are whether or not they have to dodge traffic there are many factors to take into consideration sir. That and the fact that different departments have a different sop. If the building is indeed beyond saving then a defensive attack is used to stop the possible spread to other structures. If it's safe to do so an interior attack is employed it all depends on what commands the crews are given here. No sense in unnecessary risk .
@@derrickguffey4775 not to mention trying to find water supply set up equipment at the same time listening to command as to what your assignment is. It does take a bit of time it doesn’t happen at the snap of a finger
Yet you missed the part where the house was destroyed... Oops Speed is irrelevant if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt, and is why the house was lost Spraying water onto a roof does nothing to put out the fire underneath it, which you can actually watch here They are pouring water onto the roof which quickly flows right off Meanwhile you can watch as the fire underneath does nothing but grow and spread The only time they got water into the interior is after the roof collapsed And even that water wasnt very effective
@@virgilhilts3924what were they meant to do? They couldn't get in the house, could they? And spraying water from that angle will help. An apex roof is designed for water coming down. Not up. I get wind will push rain in different directions. But water was being sprayed directly under the tiles which would have gone up and under the interlocked tile above it and into the room below. Not as effective as spraying water directly onto the fire, but I think everything here was a superb job.
Should have had 2 hose at least on that from the get go. One on each side, and spray, NOT jet. A third on the house full time might have been a good idea too.
Speed is irrelevant if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt, and is why the house was lost Spraying water onto a roof does nothing to put out the fire underneath it, which you can actually watch here They are pouring water onto the roof which quickly flows right off Meanwhile you can see the fire underneath do nothing but grow and spread The only time they got water into the interior is after the roof collapsed And even that water wasnt very effective
Same thing happened in Enniskillen last week and as seen here, once the flames reached the gutters then facias, the house went the same way. So sad to see the destruction, the loss of a family home, the mementos and possessions within and I can only hope the insurance is up to date. Great clear footage and I am impressed at how the cameraman/woman positioned themselves perfectly between the two tenders, long before they arrived..
Cheers Dave, as an owner of a mobile home myself, I filmed it to alert other owners, of how quick the whole thing spread. I found out there was nobody hurt, before posting. Cheers Steve
Positioning of the engines on scene looks a bit weird, as well as the fact that some firefighters wear no protective gear at all, but the time it took from parking brake to first line under pressure is impressive.
@@ffjsb yes there is unless you’re going to say that putting some water on a fire is pointless? In which case the person on the hose should just stand there doing nothing until the main jet is ready…..
Hello sis, this is the first time I have seen a house on fire where the water hoses have rained water for so so long and the fire persisted. Practically the whole hse is flooded, yet it is still smouldering. Well with such a scene, I hope you all should be very careful with your house.. Take good care and God bless.. With regards.. ❤❤
Right, and then people have the nerve to spout "pay attention American firefighters" what are we paying attention to? the fact that you let the house burn and did go inside.
The property was a total loss anyways and was compromised, they did the best thing and remained defensive protecting the other properties, can't send BA crews inside anyways as no one was trapped inside and the first floor and roof was a collapse risk, what they did was adequate enough to contain the fire
41 seconds after the engine stopped on scene; water started flowing onto the fire.. A normal day for the UK emergency services.. Heroes without a cape.
@@ffjsb still better than nothing whatsoever, may not be too much use in tackling the main seat of fire but can still be highly effective at protecting surrounding/adjoining property.
I live not far from here so I went to look at it a couple weeks ago after discovering this video..... house is gutted and boarded up with no roof. The two on either side of it are thankfully fine but damn itvwas a close call, especially for that one on the right.... 🔥
I think firetrucks should be equipped with truck mounted high pressure hose(s) under close to full pressure during the transit to the fire location and to full pressure and start spraying as soon as the truck comes to a halt at the scene. Every second counts. Too much time taken pulling the hoses out and turning the water on and start spraying. The water pressure on those hoses here is not enough, it was almost a weak trickle of water discharge. You got to spray with at least one or two hoses in a large diameter cone pattern under high pressure where water almost becomes atomized and saturates the air with moisture to cool down the entire local atmospheric area as well as the structures on fire to keep it from spreading to nearby structures. Other hoses can then be brought into action with more focussed and directed spray on the fire itself.
As a FF, I'll never understand the European way of using, what is basically a high pressure garden hose on fires. Here, we use big water on big fires. End result might not have changed but it probably would have gone out faster and caused less damage to exposures. Thoughts or comments from my Brothers and Sisters overseas?
in the uk, the hose reel "garden hose" is used in compartment firefighting often, and exterior.... its all to do with the water droplet sizes to reduce the amount of steam made inside a buring compartment....
@@limbeck1866 I get what you're saying. My dept used fog nozzles but with minimum 1.75 inch lines at approx 110psi. Get about 175 gallons/min. Puts fire out fast. Different tactics. Cheers .
Sorry, but through practical experience I understand the folly of "steam" and "pushing the fire". Bollocks. You must attack the source energy. Otherwise, it will have you.
@@bradleypryor5586 That sounds OK, but there's many videos from the US where it takes up to 10 minutes to produce any water from the hydrant. Meanwhile the fire's rapidly grown and spread. The hose reels are 22mm with a flow rate of 58 gallons/minute and very useful for rapid attack from the on board 1,800 litre tank. See link for vehicle use: ruclips.net/video/ZQtEdXNjono/видео.html
@@nevillemason6791 In my metro department, we were expected to get a solid water supply in about 5 minutes. There are definitely departments that don't do that. That 22mm line is what we typically refer to as a booster line or red line (because they're usually red). I loved it but we NEVER pulled it for a structure fire. For car fires like you showed, we pulled 100ft of 1.75 at about 150 gpm. Puts the fire out WAY faster, especially if there are exposures. The 22mm was typically used for small brush fires or cleanup. Don't get me wrong. EVERYONE loved that line, but it doesn't put out a substantial fire.
3pm this afternoon Thursday 27th May 2021. Motorhome caught fire, then expoloded, setting the house on fire. 3 Fire Engines in attendance. I was told no one was hurt. Shocking how quickly it all happened !!!! Clifford Park Menstrie, Clackmannanshire.
Wow, 3 Engines!?! That would have been at least a dozen different pieces of apparatus over here in the US… That’s a big job for some hard working crews!
@@firevike2420 UK houses are not 100% timber/plastic like the US (brick/concrete blocks, concrete roof tiles) so don't generate vast amounts of radiated heat and fires are often confined to the room contents. Standard turn out to a house fire is 2 pumps. Aerial platforms only used on industrial and high rise fires. UK fire hydrants have 2.5 inch outlet (hydrant stand pipe, with double outlet, on rear fire engine door at 1:09). Stand pipe screws onto the below ground hydrant valve.
UK firefighters could give the US some tips. Ours are so good. Straight on the water the second they get there. The US ones I've seen stand around talking for a while before actually doing anything. With the US firefighters and other emergency services there seems there's no urgency in what they do. Well done to ours for doing a good job.
Fast attack...with garden hoses I'm afraid. Speed is useless if you don't attack the amount of energy that is there. Sorry, but the proof is in the pudding. This was a case where a 2 1/2 inch line should have been put in play. They did not do this. The result was an exposure fire, it got 8nto the attic.
@@robertborchert932 they did use a 2.5 inch hose , they started out with the smaller high pressure hoses as they are set up and just need to be reeled out . Then they set up a 2.5 inch and a hydrant to supply it . There isn't that much water on the appliance but the smaller high pressure hoses can be utilised straight away .
Quick water yes but totally ineffective...Big fire, Big water now...Europe can't grasp that...If it looks good a lot of times it isnt....This fire is typical for ill-preperation...
@@MegaMantim Thats just bollocks... Initial attack followed up by "big water" in a planned an controlled manner by professional fire fighters without all the fannying around you usually see in the US. But different strokes for different folks I suppose...
Je suis peut être d'une autre époque mais en mon temps une equipe aurait pénétré dans la maisonet pourtant les equipements étaient moins performant mais autre époque autre technique bravo pour votre boulot mesdames messieurs.
@@tymcclengineering8672 Respect Brother.So Much Doing Nothing. I Felt Embarrassed.Sadly I Looked A Sad Joke.To Slow,Not Old School Fire Fighters.They Lost It. Looked Like They Were Untrained.Take Care Brother.👍.
Pelo visto o incêndio começou no motorhome e terminou na residência.....e deu muito trabalho para os bombeiros extinguir...... parabéns ao Fire Departament !!
I presume you are American. At least the lego fire service got water (albeit a slow flow) on the fire within 30 seconds of arrival. I've seen videos of US fire services taking up to six minutes to get water flowing. I once saw them described as 'foundation savers'. i.e there is nothing left of the building.
@@timothyjames5320 Those pre primed high pressure solid hose reels deliver more water than you can see due to the pressure. Their immediate deployment time saves a lot of lives and property, particularly in vehicle fires where their training water on adjacent fire time is 15 seconds. They also allow a rescue crew to enter a building almost immediately, without waiting for lines to be pulled and primed. Their water delivery time is 10 to 15 minutes continuous running from the tank. When the second truck arrives, they then have 4 lines which put out more than 95% of UK fires without unrolling larger hoses. The rolled hose at 1:40 was for hydrant to tank connection. Even if not required, the tanks are kept topped up ready for the next call. Another important factor is that everyone has a specific task on arrival, rather than standing around waiting for orders The US laugh at them, but they are now being installed in several city areas, where they are more versatile than their deck cannons. PS, I saw one American incident, where the water on fire time was 17 minutes.
Need big water for that, straight to a 2.5 inch smoothbore handline. Water on the fire quickly is good but doesnt matter if you dont have the right line
I mean they went straight to a main jet they just had the HPHR while it was being setup 😂 why wouldn’t you do that to get some water on it while that’s happening it isn’t going to slow the process down
You all just watched the same thing I did right??? A garden hose on a car fire “in one minute”…. And a few minutes later a house engulfed in fire…..not sure what was the great deed done here…..looked like a comedy of errors with crossing water lines and people running around without much command
I acc can’t be bothered to write an intellectual reply to someone as ignorant to firefighting and frankly stupid to reading a situation…….it’s literally there in the film. If you knew how to read smoke and fire etc it may make you sound less of a moron in future comments.
Im just watching now, great to have a Fire Service & reminds me to always have two garden hoses always ready. What happened to the big hoses, the house next door needs saving too ?!
I watch a lot of these videos, most of which are in the USA and I'm always shocked at how slow they are attacking a fire. These boys put the yanks to shame. Great response boys.
BS The never got water onto the house fire, which is why it spread throughout the home The only time they got water onto the seat of the structure fire... was after the roof collapsed And even then only part of it Speed means nothing if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt This incident is what we call surround & drown... because they never actually attacked the seat of the house fire
All that yellow smoke looked to me is if the whole top of the dwelling was about to flash over. And it appeared that the fire 🔥started in an automobile 🚘 and spread to the dwelling. That happens all to often.
The title says 'Motorhome fire and explosion'. In the US that's an 'RV'. Unlike the US, the house isn't just wood/plastic. It's brick/concrete block construction and the roof is concrete tiles (with solar panels). There's a lot less to burn, never the less the fire has got into the interior and the roof space.
Wow I never caught the title of the video,and from the view I saw I couldn't see the R.V but we all must be very board commenting on comments. I watch dozens of these fire dept. videos.
@@nevillemason6791 The rainwater guttering and boards along the base of the roof are UPVC and the roof is held up by wooden trussed rafters, so yes there is a lot to burn. That roof was going well inside before the Fire Service arrived.
Can someone explain the logic of not performing an aggressive interior fire attack as soon as it was obvious that the fire had extended into the structure? Instead of spraying water on the outside walls where it isn’t even hitting the fire?
Looks like the motorhome was parked close to the door so obstructed accesz. Plus they didnt know how many gas cylinders were inside...too risky for firemen...
The risk assessment would have made not to due to the Fire spread within the roof space which as you can see before the Fire Appliances arrived had taken hold. Firstly the Camper Van was close to the front door which would have prevented an early entry to the house, secondly the risk from the roof collapsing would have been too great, The weight of that roof would have been several tonnes. In the Uk we have have Safe systems of work and Health & Safety Policies we are required to follow.
Other than the other comments the exterior attack is being effective. As you can see in the video, the change in colour of smoke, change in pressure and punch out are all indicators that the defensive attack is working well. I think personally I wouldn’t make the decision to commit firefighters into that building to much risk of cylinders from the motorhome, risk of collapse and risk from the jets going into the building.
No fire station in Menstrie, Alloa (3 pumps), Bridge of Allen & Tillicoultry (only 1 pump each) fire stations are each about 5 miles away, & Stirling,Dunblane are even further away.
@@nathanr.8556 fire and rescue is organised somewhat differently in the UK, we don't have the small fire departments that you see in the USA, indeed Scotland is covered by one fire and rescue service and one ambulance service, theres a huge difference in residential construction between the US and UK with the vast majority of uk homes built brick, indeed if you built a US style timber home in the UK you would (a) struggle to get a loan to buy it and(b) struggle to find anyone to give you home insurance without paying significantly more than for a brick built home
@@stevenbowers4164 Been some real bad timber framed fires in the UK, & one day there will be a high fatality one,I do not like timber framed buildings,2 timber framed tower blocks burnt down,one was in Peckham, London in 2009. You get very,very rapid fire spread,darn scary, seen one where the fire burned inside the cavity first,before breaking out & spreading to a garage.www.fire-magazine.com/it-s-in-the-walls
This is how fast most firefighters get the water going around Europe, we have fast attack lines, but the US is still here, with unrolling the hose, the connections, tighten the connections, set the PSI, go to the hydrant, get the kinks out of the hose, then finally start spraying.. The US firefighters take an average of 7-10 minutes to start spraying water, once on scene, because of the weird hose system they have.
Your assertions are 100% BS That said, you missed the part where this house was destroyed... Oops Speed is irrelevant if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt, and is why the house was lost Spraying water onto a roof does nothing to put out the fire underneath it, which you can actually watch here They are pouring water onto the roof which quickly flows right off Meanwhile you can watch as the fire underneath does nothing but grow and spread The only time they got water into the interior is after the roof collapsed And even that water wasnt very effective
Is that apply to everywhere, or communist countries. Communication is a very important part of a fire scene, and your told to spray low to out out the base of the fire, cooling it enough to maybe do an interior attack. When you think you know more, come back and try another comment.
![Tee Grizzley - Robbery 8 [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/34_vkNV6wrU/mqdefault.jpg)
You guys and girls are so quick at getting water on to the fire, Firefighters in the US would have stood around looking at it for 10min, so glad you are the ones looking out for us in the UK
Yeah no.
In the US they'd have looked for a doughnut (yes, correct spelling) store first.
No we would have stretch two 1 3/4 interior lines in less than 2 minutes been prepared to open the roof, setup positive pressure which would have helped keep the fire out of the building. Put an additional exposure line on the neighbors house. Cranked up the deck gun and knocked the RV fire out in 1 minute.
No interior fire fighting at all in the video they let the fire breached the roof then dumped tons of water on the attic. Waste!.
Oh yeah are all your lined rolled up we have 4 attack line skids mid ship a 5 inch supply line and 3 large attack lines equipped with small blitz water monitors and 2 1/2 fog or smooth bore nozzles.
So to you who try to make fun of US tactics come ride with us we will show you how to do the job.
@@Coastalgafiretrn You would have done that after hunting for a hydrant for ages. Water flowing here 34 seconds after arrival!!
you couldn't be more wrong about U.S. firefighters. They're some of the best in the world. I've witnessed these firefighters firsthand, and they would put these Brits, to shame.
Being a tad 'old school' my view of this is somewhat different. It was clear that the roof of the property was being affected by the vehicle fire and this could be seen by the crews on arrival. I've been retired now for 25 years but I would have had a BA crew up in the loft with a hosereel immediately after getting water on to that vehicle fire. This would have prevented fire spread in the structure and saved a whole lot of grief for the owners.
I saw little point in setting up the ground monitor just to wash the roof along with the 3 other jets I counted. The fire was inside, not outside. Still, at least everyone got to wear a tabard.
If that's how fires are approached these days and this is brigade policy then so be it. I'll go back to sleep. 😂😂
This.
why didn't they send a crew in, is it too dangerous due to the roof collapse?
@@COMPUTERGAMESPS5
Good question.
Close coupled roof construction can be problematic in fires. Those spiked plates hammered in that join together the spars are an aluminium alloy. Aluminium melts at around 660°C, fires generally burn around 900°C to 1100°C so there is a probable/possible loss of stability. In the early stages of an incident, however, which this was, whilst it is a consideration, it shouldn't limit the Incident Commander's actions in mitigating the damage to the property.
i noticed the next door window smashes from the heat. it must be some heat from that distance then to do that.
ive watched a lot of these type of video's and i came up with the idea of a hoistable fire blanket that you could put between properties that could activate when there's a fire. i don't know if that's a good invention or not some day.
I'm always impressed how quickly UK firefighters get water on a fire compared to USA, who take 5 to 15 minutes, shame you held the camera the wrong way round though
I Timed it close to 35 seconds. Very impressive for sure
What did you say, shame on him? Have you tried holding a camera for 20 mins?
What are you talking about ???? 35 seconds to get water on the fire. That was impressive. Did you not read the message properly ???????
@@Redrose-zc7hj
Urgency wasn't there if they look at the footage very slow water pressure very bad at first probably lost three homes wen really should of only been a camper van.
5 to 15 minutes???? Are you saying in the US once crews arrive on scene it takes them 5-15 minutes to get water on the fire??? Is that what your saying?????
I see alot of comments on here knocking us fire departments and comments about uk firefighters at the end of the day you all do the same job no matter where in the world you are and I daresay in each country things are done differently! But you are all brothers the world over no matter where you come from! Firefighters of every country you di a great job much respect and admiration to you all!
Well said 👏
Thank you!👍🏼
Fantastic response from the fire service, well done to all the emergency response teams who attended the call, and well done to the camera operator for capturing all the action and fast response of the crews involved.
Thank you Billy, we too own a Motorhome, and it sits on our driveway. I took the video, to highlight just how quickly, fire can spread. I'm so glad, that no one was injured. Cheers Steve
I to have a caravan in my driveway very close to my house. My neighbour also has one in their driveway that separates our vans by about 1.5 meters. How quickly you can lose everything. Great work by the fire crews protecting the exposures and nice handy work by the cameraman. Cheers from Australia 🇦🇺
Fantastic?
Hardly
1 minute and water on the fire. Good job, lads, and lasses stay safe they should not be keeper so close to houses they spread to quickly when fire starts
Wow. That was one angry fire!! The rate it spread too. Bet the neighbours were glad (sort of) that they are detached houses!!
Camera man. Not a bad job but still need practice before you land that job at the BBC!! 😂
Great work by the guys at the Scottish Fire & Rescue Service.
Our heart goes out to the residents that were caught up in this incident, thankfully nobody was understood to have been seriously injured or in need of any frontline medical care Steve.
The explosion pops that you can hear in the background which was previously thought by some to be aerosol cannisters is actually that of solar lithium batteries exploding although at those temperatures inside the property anything that is combustible is potentially very much not immune to exploding.
Although the extent of the damage to the roof & guttering is the least of anyones worries sadly not to mention the solar system and that's just for starters sadly.
Really hope all concerned are fully insured, really sad watching someone's personal property being destroyed by fire although it could have been alot worse!
4:08 The fire fighter who is running to the end of driveway is gesturing to his colleague to increase the pressure of the water.
Solar lithium batteries! And to think the world wants everyone to use batteries for everyday living! 🫤
Świetna robota człowieku nie ośmiesza się Nic dziwnego że Polacy jeżdżą do pożarów po całym świecie jak z takim pożarem nie umiecie sobie poradzić
Não achei muito inteligente eles gastarem todo o tempo e a preciosa água só molhando o telhado por fora enquanto o fogo tava lá dentro da casa destruindo tudo.
Eu acho que primeiro tinha que quebrar os vitros e as portas e ia direto nos focos do fogo 🔥.
Wo bitte schön ist das eine großartige Arbeit der Feuerwehr. ⁉️
Den kann man beim Laufen die Schuhe besohlen so schnell sind die.❗🤔 😵 🤭
@@melania3228 Trzeba przyznać, że to nie do końca Liga Sprawiedliwości, więc bądźmy uczciwi i realistyczni, chociaż zawsze można poprawić czas reakcji, słuszna uwaga Malenia!
Amazing what you can do with one appliance and a well trained crew. This as a nasty fire, well done to the guys and girls in their professional approach.
Really nice to see good boundary cooling to protect neighbouring property. U often don't see it on RUclips. Nice job chaps and chapesses👍
Wow, these firefighters actually hustled! That's the fastest I've ever seen firefighters attacking a fire. Good job! 👍👏
They never attacked the house fire... they sprayed water on the roof & walls as opposed the actual seat of the fire
Which is why the fire continued on the inside, spread throughout the house, and the roof collapsed
You have to actually get water on the fire to stop it.
@@virgilhilts3924 why would they risk fire fighters when the property was empty and the roof and first floor compromised.
@@douglasstocks9698
What does any of your assertion have to do with what the poster stated and my reply do it?
35 seconds from parking brake to water on fire.
Take note US guys
Not enough water.neaded 2 pipe squeakieys full pressure,followed with the big stuff.
@@harryproud9679For God sake!
Thanks m8.are you a firefighter, I was , London , Kingston Wimbledon. Tooting ,Brixton, ect. It was in out no messing about.kindest regards.
Very good. Now try getting the rest right😂
70 seconds in no nock down yet ?????
great response. hopefully nobody hurt and can rebuild quickly
Interesting on seeing the variations in fire ground tactics from other countries. In California the response and initial attack would have been completely different, but would most likely would have had the same end results. Glad no one was hurt, and sad to see such loss!
Well said, other countries should watch this video and learn by it, water on flames is good rather than just standing watching as the property burns down, and did you see how fast they had the first water on after arrival, well done to everyone involved.
@@digicam8 Fast water doesn't matter if the hose line is totally inadequate...
I definitely would not say well done when they burned the house down...
@@ffjsb well they didn't burn the house down but they all did try and save it, didn't see any of the crews just standing watching it burn like you see in other videos, it was the initial response and attack response I was referring to, so again, well done all crews.
@@ffjsb The definitely didn't burn the house down.
@@ffjsb
Well said sir
At least they had water on it in under 20 seconds of arriving. Not waste precious time screw around like most house fire video. Great work men and woman firefighters. That house was a complete burn down ,the best they could do was save the neighbors houses and they did
They didn’t have engine water on it in 20 seconds that was a garden hose.
I’m not a fireman nor do I know the policy of this brigade but all I can say is jolly well done and they deserve more than a pat on their shoulder. Thanks for your hard work and dedication to the job. Stay safe and stay awesome.
Well said 👏
@@stevepeebles61😢
im really lucky to live within a 4 min drive of the fire station (including traffic), i had a house fire when i was like 15, i was walking home from school and i just had a bad feeling as soon as the fire engines went past and as i got to my road i saw lots of smoke but luckily it wasnt all bad news as everyone was okay and we lived with our aunt for a few months and our house was A okay
The worst fire fighters ever
I am glad I am not the only one thinking they delt with this fire wrong.
In the states there are a great many departments that fight fires from the outside of the building. Indeed they are proud of this tactic. The departments that follow this philosophy tend to be suburban departments and on the more well to do side, income wise. They feel that the home owners have insurance for a reason, building new buildings is good for the economy and fewer firefighters get hurt fighting the fire on the outside of the building than on the inside. (I am certain that the cost savings in this has absolutely no impact on this policy.) There are also departments that lack the manpower to get aggressive with their firefighting, though this does not appear to be the case in this clip.
These firemen don't show any urgency while the fire rages & spreading to the house and engulfing it. They are acting in a very leisurely manner.
My feelings exactly, nobody hustled like in their training.
20 mn de préparation en contrôlant après ils envoient la sauce 22 mm tout est éteint enfin si c’est une tesla c’est autre chose
Lazy attitude
Well done lads. Got water onto the fire in under a minute, and didn"t all stand around like some other countrie"s fire depts and watch it burn!!!
Doesn’t matter how fast you have water flowing, if you Don’t know how to attack the
fire and protect exposures
@@jk1320m Expert!
@@jk1320m
Correct
Speed is irrelevant if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt, and is why the house was lost
Spraying water onto a roof does nothing to put out the fire underneath it, which you can actually watch here
They are pouring water onto the roof which quickly flows right off
Meanwhile you can see the fire underneath do nothing but grow and spread
The only time they got water into the interior is after the roof collapsed
And even that water wasnt very effective
Interesting Video - Thank you for uploading!
Bloody hell that’s a nasty one.
That’s someone’s possessions and memories gone up in smoke.
All one can hope for is that everyone got out safely.
Pretty shocking fire.
Fire fighters did an awesome job, hope home owners have a fast recovery from shock an rebuilding their home.
That's assuming they have insurance 🙄
@@davidcurry4433 if they have a mortgage ... Building insurance as far as I know is compulsory.x
@@thatcatboab It's not compulsory in the UK if you own your own home..
@@davidcurry4433 ok just wondered.
@@thatcatboabIt should be law to have full Building and Contents insurance for a property in the UK ? Unfortunately it's not compulsory. Which I think is a stupid written law.
I have looked at many videos or fire's. I am amazed to see the quick response and action of these fire fighting team. Well done you guys.
Вывод- по вине пожарных сгорел дом.У них там такой прикол не тушить,а водой поливать,только не там где горит.
Если бы у нас так работали пожарные,их бы давно уволили.
Did I see that right? A watch manager in a BA set? That’s a rare sight.
I was just going to post the same thing!! 😂 Dare I say it.. Must be a team player 🤦🏼😂
it suer is but sometimes even the boss has to help his or her team in a major incident.
Not really. !!!!
May I suggest landscape mode?
You get more of what the firefighters are doing then.
I’m sure he’ll remember that for the next house fire he walks past
Не знаю как другие, а мне было стыдно смотреть как работают пожарники, а струя воды…. Вот это мощь…
Соледарен с вами. Зато какие коменты
So, quick response, immediate initial protection of exposures, quick work to establish water supply and effective use of this thereafter. Great work. If this was in the USA they would still be pulling houses and smashing windows with no water well after the video ended, and 3 houses lost. Not this country
Yeah, I don't get the window-smashing. I've seen videos from other countries, where they just open the windows.
I feel so sorry for the owners of this house but it could have been worse if it happened at night and they had potential to be trapped in their home .
И только они но и соседи-почему так близко друг к другу строят дома -кошмар
At 10 10 one of the firemen is just casually watering the conifer tree haha
SHAZAAM ! the sure move faster then American firefighters. . .
You CLEARLY have ZERO knowledge of what you're talking about. While it takes slightly longer to get water from a preconnected hand line, a small 1" reel flows very little water. They are making almost NO headway into this fire with that small line, and NO ONE has on SCBA initially.
@@ffjsb oh stop it!!!!!!
FFJSB you have no clue at all. Whilst they hook up to a hydrant they are not only able to attack the fire with what they have instantly at hand but can cool the neighbouring property and prevent it spreading to there too. US firefighters would still be running around trying to look good and by the time they were ready to fight the fire the houses either side of this fire would be engulfed.
Wow alot disdain for American firefighters it seems . Apparently you Brits cant get over your own supposed superiority complex. Aren't you're firefighters the ones who tell people to stay in a burning building. See over here our firefighters want to save our lives and tell us to get the hell out no matter how small the fire is. Until you actually know more about the way American firefighters are trained and what the priorities at a fire scene are best to keep your insults to yourself.
@@DasArab Son, you're a special kind of stupid. I actually do this for a living, and have for decades...
I'm brasilian fireman! Retired. Good service!
👿😪🥺🤩😪😊🙉🥺🥺😊🙉🥺🙉😊🥺🙉🤩😝🤩☠️☠️😝😽☠️😽😝
Electrical vehicle fire.
By the black , black Toxic smoke.? Seeing a lot of electrical fires good job fireman and keep safe.
Im just glad that there was a bystander there directing the fire fighters where the fire was otherwise those poor guys may have never found it 😮
The lady firefighter is working harder than ten men 👍
The Firefighters are here.
This is heartbreaking!
I was hoping it would catch the house, goes to show how rapid fire spreds!
My heart goes out,this is awful!
Oh my God!!!!!
The firemen are fantastic in rapid action, but the fire was very strong!!!!!!
Jesus.. water on fire 9 seconds on scene.. at least slow down to chock the tires fellas. Good work.
High pressure hose reels give rapid attack on small fires (flow 58 US gallons/min.) using the on-board 1,800 litre tank. Often can extinguish small fires especially on vehicles. In this case it had gone way over that as Alloa fire station is 4.3 miles travel distance.
Los bomberos y auxiliares del camión cisterna, TARDAN MUCHO EN CONECTAR MAS MANGUERAS. SON MUY LENTOS.
Amazing work yet again. I've watched lots of vids like this and I get frustrated to see the American fire fighters take do long to get water on. It's almost like they say too late let it burn.
Not true at all it depends on the fire conditions and first arrival size up how long the fire has been burning how far the crews have to travel to get there and with how inconsiderate some idiots are whether or not they have to dodge traffic there are many factors to take into consideration sir. That and the fact that different departments have a different sop. If the building is indeed beyond saving then a defensive attack is used to stop the possible spread to other structures. If it's safe to do so an interior attack is employed it all depends on what commands the crews are given here. No sense in unnecessary risk .
@@derrickguffey4775 not to mention trying to find water supply set up equipment at the same time listening to command as to what your assignment is. It does take a bit of time it doesn’t happen at the snap of a finger
Yet you missed the part where the house was destroyed... Oops
Speed is irrelevant if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt, and is why the house was lost
Spraying water onto a roof does nothing to put out the fire underneath it, which you can actually watch here
They are pouring water onto the roof which quickly flows right off
Meanwhile you can watch as the fire underneath does nothing but grow and spread
The only time they got water into the interior is after the roof collapsed
And even that water wasnt very effective
Too busy posing for pictures and putting on leather helmets. Morons.
@@virgilhilts3924what were they meant to do? They couldn't get in the house, could they? And spraying water from that angle will help. An apex roof is designed for water coming down. Not up. I get wind will push rain in different directions. But water was being sprayed directly under the tiles which would have gone up and under the interlocked tile above it and into the room below. Not as effective as spraying water directly onto the fire, but I think everything here was a superb job.
Should have had 2 hose at least on that from the get go. One on each side, and spray, NOT jet. A third on the house full time might have been a good idea too.
fire engines dont have unlimited water
Twenty seven seconds from arrival to fighting the fire!
About two minutes faster than US firefighters it seems from various videos.
Speed is irrelevant if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt, and is why the house was lost
Spraying water onto a roof does nothing to put out the fire underneath it, which you can actually watch here
They are pouring water onto the roof which quickly flows right off
Meanwhile you can see the fire underneath do nothing but grow and spread
The only time they got water into the interior is after the roof collapsed
And even that water wasnt very effective
Same thing happened in Enniskillen last week and as seen here, once the flames reached the gutters then facias, the house went the same way. So sad to see the destruction, the loss of a family home, the mementos and possessions within and I can only hope the insurance is up to date. Great clear footage and I am impressed at how the cameraman/woman positioned themselves perfectly between the two tenders, long before they arrived..
Cheers Dave, as an owner of a mobile home myself, I filmed it to alert other owners, of how quick the whole thing spread. I found out there was nobody hurt, before posting. Cheers Steve
Fire is inside the rear building but fire fighters spraying water outside ! Instead should go inside the house and finished up fire base. 😂
11:00 I thing they need to go attic to put this fire down. Funny way to roll the fire hose. Best wishes from polish fireman.
Dobra robota !!! Dzielnie walczyli !!!!
Wow that went up so fast!
Firefighters are brave 😍
Another good job by F & R, as usual. Sorry for the owner.
Positioning of the engines on scene looks a bit weird, as well as the fact that some firefighters wear no protective gear at all, but the time it took from parking brake to first line under pressure is impressive.
Only the drivers aren’t in gear.
@@CymruEmergencyResponderI think he is talking about lack of breathing apparatus on the crews. I found that interesting also.
Marvellous vid well put together excellent work
Nice camera work, shows everything and kept filming throughout. Awful for the householders but hopefully the I insurance will cover it all 🤞🏼
Shite camera work, you mean!
What a smoke!!! Good job propje
Nice water on the fire quickly!
Except that in wasn't nearly enough to do the job.
@@ffjsb you’ve genuinely missed the point of an initial defensive attack. Just engage your brain for a moment to understand the logic
@@swt2296 Again, not enough to do the job... If you can't knock down the fire, then there's no point in doing it.
@@ffjsb yes there is unless you’re going to say that putting some water on a fire is pointless? In which case the person on the hose should just stand there doing nothing until the main jet is ready…..
Hello sis, this is the first time I have seen a house on fire where the water hoses have rained water for so so long and the fire persisted. Practically the whole hse is flooded, yet it is still smouldering. Well with such a scene, I hope you all should be very careful with your house..
Take good care and God bless.. With regards.. ❤❤
I noticed your fire service did not attempt to put the house fire out; they just let it burn and contained it.
Right, and then people have the nerve to spout "pay attention American firefighters" what are we paying attention to? the fact that you let the house burn and did go inside.
The property was a total loss anyways and was compromised, they did the best thing and remained defensive protecting the other properties, can't send BA crews inside anyways as no one was trapped inside and the first floor and roof was a collapse risk, what they did was adequate enough to contain the fire
Look at all that black smoke, that’s one house. Imagine Maui with the hundreds of homes that were burnt how dark that smoke must’ve been.😢
Is this real? They had water on it in less than a minute after arrival! I’ve never seen that fast before!!! Excellent work !!!!
Yes sadly it was real. Excellent work indeed Derrick.
41 seconds after the engine stopped on scene; water started flowing onto the fire.. A normal day for the UK emergency services.. Heroes without a cape.
@@CallumKray Heros without SCBA as well... SMH.
Fast water doesn't mean much when the hose line is too small...
@@ffjsb still better than nothing whatsoever, may not be too much use in tackling the main seat of fire but can still be highly effective at protecting surrounding/adjoining property.
Just goes to show how quickly fires can take off .sympathy to the home owner 😢😢
Luckily no one was hurt in the fire. It took 20 months before the folk could move in.
Reason 950 why not to build houses so close together.
Here in North Yorkshire UK the fire services take upto 30 minutes or more to arrive on scene by that time there would be nothing left
In South Africa, the fire engine won't even get out of the station because the proletariat have stolen the wheels and battery.
@@a95569 omg
Bad fire that, the house will need rebuilt probally and the 2 on each side gutted with smoke damage, how are they looking today?
I live not far from here so I went to look at it a couple weeks ago after discovering this video..... house is gutted and boarded up with no roof. The two on either side of it are thankfully fine but damn itvwas a close call, especially for that one on the right.... 🔥
See them daily as I pass. Fire house was gutted either side is fine.
@@1ninjatiger Interested to know, is the "fire house" rebuilt or still boarded up
@@beccabush1252 rebuilt
18 seconds after arrival to get water on the fire!👍👍🤩
but where was the interior fire attack? All you're doing is cooling the roof and exterior walls!
Don't post stupid questions your just making a tit of yourself.
Meanwhile the fire did nothing but grow and spread throughout the interior
I think firetrucks should be equipped with truck mounted high pressure hose(s) under close to full pressure during the transit to the fire location and to full pressure and start spraying as soon as the truck comes to a halt at the scene.
Every second counts.
Too much time taken pulling the hoses out and turning the water on and start spraying. The water pressure on those hoses here is not enough, it was almost a weak trickle of water discharge.
You got to spray with at least one or two hoses in a large diameter cone pattern under high pressure where water almost becomes atomized and saturates the air with moisture to cool down the entire local atmospheric area as well as the structures on fire to keep it from spreading to nearby structures.
Other hoses can then be brought into action with more focussed and directed spray on the fire itself.
As a FF, I'll never understand the European way of using, what is basically a high pressure garden hose on fires. Here, we use big water on big fires. End result might not have changed but it probably would have gone out faster and caused less damage to exposures. Thoughts or comments from my Brothers and Sisters overseas?
in the uk, the hose reel "garden hose" is used in compartment firefighting often, and exterior.... its all to do with the water droplet sizes to reduce the amount of steam made inside a buring compartment....
@@limbeck1866 I get what you're saying. My dept used fog nozzles but with minimum 1.75 inch lines at approx 110psi. Get about 175 gallons/min. Puts fire out fast. Different tactics. Cheers .
Sorry, but through practical experience I understand the folly of "steam" and "pushing the fire".
Bollocks. You must attack the source energy. Otherwise, it will have you.
@@bradleypryor5586 That sounds OK, but there's many videos from the US where it takes up to 10 minutes to produce any water from the hydrant. Meanwhile the fire's rapidly grown and spread. The hose reels are 22mm with a flow rate of 58 gallons/minute and very useful for rapid attack from the on board 1,800 litre tank. See link for vehicle use: ruclips.net/video/ZQtEdXNjono/видео.html
@@nevillemason6791 In my metro department, we were expected to get a solid water supply in about 5 minutes. There are definitely departments that don't do that. That 22mm line is what we typically refer to as a booster line or red line (because they're usually red). I loved it but we NEVER pulled it for a structure fire. For car fires like you showed, we pulled 100ft of 1.75 at about 150 gpm. Puts the fire out WAY faster, especially if there are exposures. The 22mm was typically used for small brush fires or cleanup. Don't get me wrong. EVERYONE loved that line, but it doesn't put out a substantial fire.
If the fire department was quicker the house wouldn't have caught fire
What? That's a stupid thing to say. The house was already on fire before the fire brigade was called.
3pm this afternoon Thursday 27th May 2021. Motorhome caught fire, then expoloded, setting the house on fire. 3 Fire Engines in attendance.
I was told no one was hurt. Shocking how quickly it all happened !!!!
Clifford Park Menstrie, Clackmannanshire.
Absolutely terrifying
@@janeclark46 , luckily no one hurt.
Wow, 3 Engines!?! That would have been at least a dozen different pieces of apparatus over here in the US… That’s a big job for some hard working crews!
How many per engine? No matter-that is one bust ass bull work fire. They earned their pay on this one. No losses and no injuries. That, is a win.
@@firevike2420 UK houses are not 100% timber/plastic like the US (brick/concrete blocks, concrete roof tiles) so don't generate vast amounts of radiated heat and fires are often confined to the room contents. Standard turn out to a house fire is 2 pumps. Aerial platforms only used on industrial and high rise fires. UK fire hydrants have 2.5 inch outlet (hydrant stand pipe, with double outlet, on rear fire engine door at 1:09). Stand pipe screws onto the below ground hydrant valve.
Fascinating 😮 in holiday times remember to have your motor home safely away from your house
Hi Jim , you had to be there, mate .
The fire took hold so quickly 👍
UK firefighters could give the US some tips. Ours are so good. Straight on the water the second they get there. The US ones I've seen stand around talking for a while before actually doing anything. With the US firefighters and other emergency services there seems there's no urgency in what they do. Well done to ours for doing a good job.
I was thinking the same , 30 seconds after they arrived the first hose was on and working. Lucky no one was in the house
Fast attack...with garden hoses I'm afraid. Speed is useless if you don't attack the amount of energy that is there.
Sorry, but the proof is in the pudding. This was a case where a 2 1/2 inch line should have been put in play. They did not do this.
The result was an exposure fire, it got 8nto the attic.
@@robertborchert932 they did use a 2.5 inch hose , they started out with the smaller high pressure hoses as they are set up and just need to be reeled out . Then they set up a 2.5 inch and a hydrant to supply it . There isn't that much water on the appliance but the smaller high pressure hoses can be utilised straight away .
Quick water yes but totally ineffective...Big fire, Big water now...Europe can't grasp that...If it looks good a lot of times it isnt....This fire is typical for ill-preperation...
@@MegaMantim Thats just bollocks... Initial attack followed up by "big water" in a planned an controlled manner by professional fire fighters without all the fannying around you usually see in the US. But different strokes for different folks I suppose...
Một câu chuyện buồn, mong bình yên với mọi người
The wind made that fire rage badly. Hope knowone wasn’t hurt
Luckily no one hurt.
All fine
Je suis peut être d'une autre époque mais en mon temps une equipe aurait pénétré dans la maisonet pourtant les equipements étaient moins performant mais autre époque autre technique bravo pour votre boulot mesdames messieurs.
I served 32 years in the fire service when it was a fire service, why are they washing the roof and walls its a complete joke now .
@@tymcclengineering8672 Respect Brother.So Much Doing Nothing. I Felt Embarrassed.Sadly I Looked A Sad Joke.To Slow,Not Old School Fire Fighters.They Lost It. Looked Like They Were Untrained.Take Care Brother.👍.
Pelo visto o incêndio começou no motorhome e terminou na residência.....e deu muito trabalho para os bombeiros extinguir...... parabéns ao Fire Departament !!
Everything in Britain looks like a 1980s Lego set.
I presume you are American. At least the lego fire service got water (albeit a slow flow) on the fire within 30 seconds of arrival. I've seen videos of US fire services taking up to six minutes to get water flowing. I once saw them described as 'foundation savers'. i.e there is nothing left of the building.
@@timothyjames5320 UK houses are small and ugly, the fire engines are cheap and small, your cars are cheap and small.
@@casmatori Thanks for letting me know.
@@timothyjames5320 Those pre primed high pressure solid hose reels deliver more water than you can see due to the pressure. Their immediate deployment time saves a lot of lives and property, particularly in vehicle fires where their training water on adjacent fire time is 15 seconds. They also allow a rescue crew to enter a building almost immediately, without waiting for lines to be pulled and primed. Their water delivery time is 10 to 15 minutes continuous running from the tank.
When the second truck arrives, they then have 4 lines which put out more than 95% of UK fires without unrolling larger hoses.
The rolled hose at 1:40 was for hydrant to tank connection. Even if not required, the tanks are kept topped up ready for the next call.
Another important factor is that everyone has a specific task on arrival, rather than standing around waiting for orders
The US laugh at them, but they are now being installed in several city areas, where they are more versatile than their deck cannons.
PS, I saw one American incident, where the water on fire time was 17 minutes.
@@casmatori Everything is smaller because we're a much smaller country. Roads are smaller, houses are smaller as we don't have the room the US does.
Good Service fire fighting team
Need big water for that, straight to a 2.5 inch smoothbore handline. Water on the fire quickly is good but doesnt matter if you dont have the right line
2.5" for a car fire? Work smarter not harder.
@@bradleypryor5586 car fire?
@@kimberlysevastyanenko3798 Ooops. Commented on the wrong video. What Michael said ^^^. A 2.5 would be fine.
@@bradleypryor5586 ok. Lol
I mean they went straight to a main jet they just had the HPHR while it was being setup 😂 why wouldn’t you do that to get some water on it while that’s happening it isn’t going to slow the process down
Got water on that fire faster than any American fire department! I have no idea why our departments take a long time to get water started!
You all just watched the same thing I did right??? A garden hose on a car fire “in one minute”…. And a few minutes later a house engulfed in fire…..not sure what was the great deed done here…..looked like a comedy of errors with crossing water lines and people running around without much command
Actually it’s better to have some water then no water so whilst someone had that small hose they were getting the bigger one ready as fast as possible
Riiiiggghhhttt
I acc can’t be bothered to write an intellectual reply to someone as ignorant to firefighting and frankly stupid to reading a situation…….it’s literally there in the film. If you knew how to read smoke and fire etc it may make you sound less of a moron in future comments.
@@swt2296 you’re right about not making an intellectual reply
@@brianog5267 😂😂 perfect point proven
Im just watching now, great to have a Fire Service & reminds me to always have two garden hoses always ready. What happened to the big hoses, the house next door needs saving too ?!
I watch a lot of these videos, most of which are in the USA and I'm always shocked at how slow they are attacking a fire. These boys put the yanks to shame. Great response boys.
BS
The never got water onto the house fire, which is why it spread throughout the home
The only time they got water onto the seat of the structure fire... was after the roof collapsed
And even then only part of it
Speed means nothing if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt
This incident is what we call surround & drown... because they never actually attacked the seat of the house fire
How did the motor home catch fire in the first place. Hope there insurance covers their neighbours too.
Properly gas bottle not removed
How did you manage to use 'there' and 'their' for the same thing in one sentence..?
That's how terrifying that must be.
OMG It's Gone Past 200K Views 😮
Once you get a motorhome, an outdoor open floor kinda pull out kitchen. I would design such a thing myself
All that yellow smoke looked to me is if the whole top of the dwelling was about to flash over. And it appeared that the fire 🔥started in an automobile 🚘 and spread to the dwelling. That happens all to often.
The title says 'Motorhome fire and explosion'. In the US that's an 'RV'. Unlike the US, the house isn't just wood/plastic. It's brick/concrete block construction and the roof is concrete tiles (with solar panels). There's a lot less to burn, never the less the fire has got into the interior and the roof space.
They did at least protect the exposures. The one on the right was lighting up before the hit it with water but didn’t appear to get inside.
Thanks for stating the bleeding obvious!🙄
Wow I never caught the title of the video,and from the view I saw I couldn't see the R.V but we all must be very board commenting on comments. I watch dozens of these fire dept. videos.
@@nevillemason6791 The rainwater guttering and boards along the base of the roof are UPVC and the roof is held up by wooden trussed rafters, so yes there is a lot to burn. That roof was going well inside before the Fire Service arrived.
Que triste , ojalá Nadie haya muerto
NICE SAVE BROTHER SISTERS 😃
Fires so scary to watch and so destructive and so quickly. Well done the fire services
So true.
Can someone explain the logic of not performing an aggressive interior fire attack as soon as it was obvious that the fire had extended into the structure? Instead of spraying water on the outside
walls where it isn’t even hitting the fire?
Looks like the motorhome was parked close to the door so obstructed accesz. Plus they didnt know how many gas cylinders were inside...too risky for firemen...
Because the roof was already unstable. Never commit firefighters below a collapse risk.
Because i would answer that by making sure that the house was stable enough for these firefighters to enter the house. Common sense really!!
The risk assessment would have made not to due to the Fire spread within the roof space which as you can see before the Fire Appliances arrived had taken hold. Firstly the Camper Van was close to the front door which would have prevented an early entry to the house, secondly the risk from the roof collapsing would have been too great, The weight of that roof would have been several tonnes. In the Uk we have have Safe systems of work and Health & Safety Policies we are required to follow.
Other than the other comments the exterior attack is being effective. As you can see in the video, the change in colour of smoke, change in pressure and punch out are all indicators that the defensive attack is working well. I think personally I wouldn’t make the decision to commit firefighters into that building to much risk of cylinders from the motorhome, risk of collapse and risk from the jets going into the building.
Has the cameraman got Parkinson’s?
Gee I hope no one was seriously hurt fighting that fire
In the U.S. there would be at least 6 engines on scene
No fire station in Menstrie, Alloa (3 pumps), Bridge of Allen & Tillicoultry (only 1 pump each) fire stations are each about 5 miles away, & Stirling,Dunblane are even further away.
@@stuartandrews4344 Makes no difference. In the U.S. if local resources aren't sufficient they will call for mutual aid from other departments
@@nathanr.8556 fire and rescue is organised somewhat differently in the UK, we don't have the small fire departments that you see in the USA, indeed Scotland is covered by one fire and rescue service and one ambulance service, theres a huge difference in residential construction between the US and UK with the vast majority of uk homes built brick, indeed if you built a US style timber home in the UK you would (a) struggle to get a loan to buy it and(b) struggle to find anyone to give you home insurance without paying significantly more than for a brick built home
Basically uk homes don't go up like a Roman candle
@@stevenbowers4164 Been some real bad timber framed fires in the UK, & one day there will be a high fatality one,I do not like timber framed buildings,2 timber framed tower blocks burnt down,one was in Peckham, London in 2009. You get very,very rapid fire spread,darn scary, seen one where the fire burned inside the cavity first,before breaking out & spreading to a garage.www.fire-magazine.com/it-s-in-the-walls
São anjos, os bombeiros.
Trabalho muito arriscado.
This is how fast most firefighters get the water going around Europe, we have fast attack lines, but the US is still here, with unrolling the hose, the connections, tighten the connections, set the PSI, go to the hydrant, get the kinks out of the hose, then finally start spraying.. The US firefighters take an average of 7-10 minutes to start spraying water, once on scene, because of the weird hose system they have.
Your assertions are 100% BS
That said, you missed the part where this house was destroyed... Oops
Speed is irrelevant if the water isn't used effectively, which in this case it wasnt, and is why the house was lost
Spraying water onto a roof does nothing to put out the fire underneath it, which you can actually watch here
They are pouring water onto the roof which quickly flows right off
Meanwhile you can watch as the fire underneath does nothing but grow and spread
The only time they got water into the interior is after the roof collapsed
And even that water wasnt very effective
Firefigters are absolutely untrained and unmotivated
when spraying don't keep shaking, finally the floor is sprayed, never stop spraying, don't talk too much..
Is that apply to everywhere, or communist countries. Communication is a very important part of a fire scene, and your told to spray low to out out the base of the fire, cooling it enough to maybe do an interior attack. When you think you know more, come back and try another comment.
Marvellous work by fire And rescue
How long did it take to put that fire out
It's still burning.
Until there was nothing left to burn.
The fire is bad but wow what a nice view they have
The Ochil Hills ❤️🏴