Are Turbo Engines Reliable?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 авг 2022
- I've taken a deep look into turbo engines and whether or not you can have a reliable car with a turbo in it. We'll talk about some of the ways that turbos fail or turbo engines have problems, and what issues might arise. I'll take you through an explainer of how turbo engines work and why they might have some issues as a result of how turbos work.
We all love turbo charges for efficiency and power reasons, but sometimes they can cause you to have a engine reliability issues.
Exotic car play place, where we believe that Life's Too Short To Drive Boring Cars so we just don't and you shouldn't either.
Like this video? Subscribe by clicking below:
/ @ecpp
TWITTER - @Exoticcarplaypl
- / exoticcarplaypl
FACEBOOK -
- / supercars2000
INSTAGRAM - @Exoticcar_Playplace
- / exoticcar_playplace 
Авто/Мото
They are only fuel efficient if you drive normally,NOT WHEN YOU DRIVE LIKE YOU'RE IN A NASCAR
Absolutely right. Go hard and they can guzzle too
@@ECPP Agreed.
Yep, my dads 2020 f150 has the twin turbo v6 & gets 19.5 mpg…… vs my f250 4x4 w/ a 6” lift that gets 11 mpg🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Life’s too short to drive normal.
Question is, with an ecoboost truck towing, are the turbos not constantly screaming?
Depends entirely on how you drive the car and, critically, how well you service/ maintain critical things, such as oil, coolant, etc.
Cheers
Very well said.
All diesel are turbocharged
@@ECPP welcome. I have a 2 litre turbo petrol: relatively common configuration. I change the oil for new religiously every 7000 miles, and coolant I have just recently drained and changed. Suspected wastegate actuator issue not long ago and I didn't hesitate in having a better, stronger one fitted. The stock blowoff valve I had changed from the plasticky one to a fully cast Turbosmart one. Don't want to take any chances, but, runs very nicely, smoothly and powerfully
Turbos are very sensitive to proper oil changes. Forget that "10,000-mile" oil change marketing pitch. Change your oil and filter every 4,000 miles or 6 months if you don't drive much.
The truth is, we pretty much are running out of naturally aspirated engines! Our options are very limited today.
I would agree with that
Toyota still has a plethora of natural aspirated options.
@@quinty26 Especially if you are willing to get a hybrid.
Mazda
It’s our government pushed by bankers. Nothing to do with the environment.
Planned obsolescence and the fact they're sticking them into virtually every new car should answer that question in terms of long-term reliability.
Exactly
Excellent video. Best explanation I’ve heard on turbos vs naturally aspirated. I have both and NOW i understand they have to be treated slightly different. Keep up the great work and I’ll keep watching. 👍🏼
Excellent video. Going back a few years I remember my friends lusting after the Saab 9-3 Aero with the turbo 4-cylinder engine. I thought it was an amazing design at the time, but I was living in a hot, desert climate and it seemed their turbos preferred cooler climates. Now days I drive an E350 with the turbo inline 4 cylinder engine and am amazed at how much performance you can get out of a 2L.
For sure the modern turbo engines put out a lot of power
@ECPP great video brother. what is your opinion on the new hurricane engine from jeep ? I'm looking now to lease a new wagoneer with the hurricane but I feel unsure. Would you prefer the hemi rather ?
Very nice 👍 Excellent description of use cases for turbo vs non-turbo. Also excellent description of how the engineers have to design the complexity of engines. Thanks, Mark!
Thank you very much Michael. Much appreciated. Hope you are having a great weekend.
Had a 1986 Ford Thunderbird with a little 2.3 turbo. I was just a kid old enough to drive. Worked my butt off to pay for it. I believe it was around 190 hp. which wasn't terrible for the 1980s. I fell in love with that car, had no intercooler. Not one thing while I owned it went wrong. I beat the hell out of it and towed a 19ft open fisherman style boat. I would be at the boat ramp ready to pull my boat out of the water. Always, mostly from the truck people would always keep an eye on it while I was pulling the boat out of the water. Like it wasn't going to do it. It had a five speed manual with a posi rear end. All you heard was the turbo spool up and it would easily pull my boat out, everytime. I put 120,000 rough miles on it before I sold it( had to so I could get a work truck).
It wasn't the fastest car I ever had, but it was the best, most reliable and fun car I've ever owned. I'm an old man, I've had more cars then I can remember.
Dam, I miss that car.
I know turbos put extra wear on a engine, I couldn't kill that car. Had to be very lucky, because I ran it like it was stolen. Great car.
My retired relative just bought a new Honda CRV with a non-turbo 4 cyl. The no turbo is why he went to it. He wanted less expensive complex technology and less parts and more reliability. It is also a top seller. His last car was a Fusion. My car is a 2006 Escape 4-cyl with 269,000 miles. The engine and auto trans have never been gone into. It does not burn oil.
Great choice. Performance cars are great but Honda did struggle with the 1.5 litre turbo engine
Some folks get the luck of the draw. change oil and filer between three and four thousand miles. Drive normally not like you are on a race track.
The real question is .. why would anyone want a turbo in a crv hahahaha
I have a 2017 Civic Hatchback with the 1.5 Turbo. I've been lucky so far to have had none of the problems associated with this engine. This car gets downright stupid real world MPG (34-37) and it's a blast to drive. BUT - I have no confidence that this will last for the long haul. Great Video Mark, one of my personal favorites.
Thank you so much and I appreciate you watching. I actually have a video coming soon on the 1.5 specifically, and really it is Ana amazing engine technically. Thanks again for watching.
Honda built up a great reputation from the 70's and 80's in terms of reliability, but given today, they're actually not as reliable as they once were. No one stays on top forever.
I wouldn't worry about it unless you have oil dilution. I've seen reports of the 1.5 accord blowing headgaskets but it has more boost. If you don't have oil dilution, I wouldn't worry about it.
Nice video. Appreciate the truthful information.
It's much more fun to drive turbocharged car. But as an owner I prefer reliability and simplicity of a regular engine.
I use to own a Peugot 508 turbo saloon and even after putting top grade Motul oil at service the turbo had issues like smoke and leaks later. Also, I saw the service history of the car and the turbo had repair work done to it a few years before.
The theory in practice is to take a small engine and add performance, which in turn provides for less emissions, and all the other ecological feel good legislation. Out of the equation is reliability, longevity. And the engine plastic melts like a candle, like Ford's disastrous Ecoboost engine, with enough heat to ignite the engine into flames. Carbon build up, integrity of oil quality. Personally, I like naturally aspirated engines, large displacement. Ford used to make a wonderful 460CID with a four barrel eight jet carburetor for their Lincoln line. Those were the days! I blame California for the demise of the auto industry.
That’s likely the issue. You are right, the old small and big block engines generally chugged along and lasted forever. Even the NA LS engines are work horses
Very nice Excellent description of use cases for turbo vs non-turbo. Also excellent description of how the engineers have to design the complexity of engines. Thanks, Mark!
Thank you very much!
Love your vids....lots of good stuff!
I just came across your video. Thank you so much. You made the video so easy to understand. I'm looking at the new 2024 Toyota Tacoma with 4 cylinder turbo. I feel a little bit more comfortable now.
I'm glad you decided to feature the J35 in the Accord.
I own a 2003 Accord with the J30 engine. Hopefully I can buy the 9th gen Accord V6 one day. Fantastic 6 cylinder engines.
Love this video.
Thanks very much for watching. Yes there are some great Ho da drivetrains that are indeed built to last forever with a little bit of easy maintenance
After watching this video, I think going for the Lexus IS 350 F Sport sounds like a great idea. It looks fantastic and it's a NA V6. Thanks for the information and great videos as always. Keep up the good work.
I was also deciding between BMW and Mercedes but decided Lexus might be the best bet. But, sometimes still kind of have trouble deciding.
Great work and informative. Back in 2008, I compared and opted to replace turbo with hybrid cars cause they both provide that extra boost, only with the electric, one gets instant torque, zero atmosphere impact, no added heat built up & amazing reliability with added low maintenance
But no manual. No manual, no buy. Driving an electric is better than an automatic but it's not really driving.
Well explained. Thank you.
Glad it was helpful!
Simple and straight to the point
Thanks
Also, the newer Kia's and Hyundai's with the 1.6 L turbocharged four-cylinder GDI engine and the seven-speed dual-clutch transmission are unreliable as well. Please avoid any of them and buy the ones with the 2 L and/or 2.4 L four-cylinder non-GDI engine, if you are planning to purchase a Kia or a Hyundai. Better yet, buy the ones with the 3.3 L, 3.5 L and/or the 3.8 L V6 engines instead.
Thanks for sharing
@@ECPP You're welcome.
@@md2k8 As a Kia dealership Technician, I think you hit the nail right on the head.
I have the Elantra with 1.6 Turbo but with the 6 speed manual; I definitely wouldn't have bought mine if the DCT was my only choice of transmission
I have the Elantra with 1.6 Turbo but with the 6 speed manual; I definitely wouldn't have bought mine if the DCT was my only choice of transmission
🇨🇦 great subject & content. Have a great weekend 🇨🇦✌️👍
Thank you very much. Hope you are also enjoying the weekend. Cheers
I always wanted to get an answer on this topic! Tyvm
Thanka
After having a terrible charged car and now switching over to a regular 3.7 V6 I much prefer the naturally aspirated much less things to worry about and it sounds so damn good fuel economy for me has been about the same I average about 19 to 22 in the city with the V6 depending on how I drive and with the 4-cylinder turbocharged I would typically average about the same
I’m doing real world documentation on my 2018 Civic EXT, 1.5 liter, turbo, GDI, CVT. To date I have 124,100 trouble-free miles with exceptional maintenance. I’m hoping to get 300k miles without repair. Looking forward to your video on this type of engine.
Cheers
If you maintain your oil change on time turbo can be for life, fresh oil is the key to maintain the longevity of a turbo
True
You gave me the answer. Thank you!
Turbo 4s are generally short-lived. I had an Audi A4, and it was wretched in terms of reliability and upkeep. Used oil, lots of electronic issues, and at 50K miles, the turbo died. As naturally aspirated engines go away, we'll be driving more cars that are expensive, unreliable and so on. Gone are the days when your Toyota Camry would last 200K miles.
The Camry still can but in base engine configuration
4cy turbo diesels are perfectly fine and capable of moon miles.
Camrys are still naturally aspirated
What year was your Audi? Some models are less reliable than others
It wasn't the turbo that made it short lived, it was the Audi. Lol. I've had Nissan SR20DET engines that stayed incredibly reliable for a long time and same with EJ20ET. The EJ had a chance of issue from weak pistons that Subaru used but as a daily under stock boost, it was fine. Either engine had stock turbos last over 150k miles with regular oil changes.
It's modifying that kills turbos and engines. Poor tuning. Over boosting. Lack of cool down. Poor gas quality. This is mostly from user error.
good info. I like your channel.
Thank you very much
Wife has the V8 Mercedes 2 turbo. I ❤️ my golf. Never an issue. Great German build quality.
Very nice. I love the Golfs, we have owned a couple before too
I'll take the Escape with the 2.5 4 cylinder, I DON'T WANT A TURBO. They are fast, but don't last
That’s fair. I know a person with the current Escape in Na form and someone with the turbo 2 and the NA has been less problematic so far.
@@ECPP You can also go for the Escape with the 3 L V6 engine instead.
Appreciate your videos man!! Could you make one specifically for the Genesis G70 2.0 and 3.3 twin turbo?
I will see what we can do. Thanks for watching
@@ECPP thanks man!
Very educative video
Thank you
Mark, I found this video educational. Can you do one on superchargers. thanks
Thanks a lot. You bet, that is certainly in the que. part of a small series indeed.
Use decent full synthetic oil and give the engine a chance to warm before you hammer it. That's all you need to know.
My daily driver was a golf tdi pd, with original factory turbo and re map 160bhp, 200,000 miles, change oil regular and air filter ( factory airbox). Also V.N.T never seized.
Thanks for sharing
Kinda like AWD.(puts less stress on the engine, when drove lightly and not maxing it out,and not driving conservatively)
Depends mainly on the engine and type of engine mainly.
That’s exactly true. Some engines get the R and D to make them durable while others are poorly done.
I bought a 2021 Subaru Legacy with the 2.4 turbo. I like having the power when I want/need it, but I wish now I had bought the naturally aspirated 2.5 in the Legacy. Would have cost less and it probably would last longer. I make sure I change the oil a little sooner than Subaru recommends.
Yup, Now You're In My Territory. I Worked For Honeywell For 22yrs, In The Turbocharger Division. In Higher Altitudes They Lose Power Because Of Thinner Air. Another Problem Is, Bent Turbo Blades & Shafts From Turbo Heat. In1992, I Bought A Nissan 300zx, But, Not The Twin Turbo Version, And Still Have It Today ! The Only Difference Is Less Speed On The Front End, But Both Clock In At 155 mph. Love This Car !! 😉👌💯🏁
All engines can lose power at high altitudes, but normally aspirated engines suffer far worse than turbocharged ones.
In fact turbocharging and supercharging was used in aviation engines during WW2 to enable aircraft to fly higher.
What about the honda accord 2.0t is it suppose to be reliable in the long run?
Turbochargers require good maintenance and some sane driving. Ignore the maintenance will always lead to failure.
You also made a good argument for hybrid vehicles. Great for short trips, no turbo lag, less maintenance bc the engine only runs half the time, but good acceleration. The Honda CR-V hybrid is faster 0-60 than its 1.5 turbo sibling.
You bet, short city trips, hybrids do make sense indeed. For pure fun the ICE component is the win. May be a win win.
@@ECPP I actually like the idea of a turbo in a sports car or diesel, but I’m skeptical of putting a turbo in a tiny engine for improved fuel economy
Thanks......great explanation...........so choose what you want......many cars there..............
Absolutely there Ted. Have a great weekend
The 2.0 tsi Is one of the most interesting engine by far
Can you please do a reliability comparison with turbo versus supercharger?
That is why I got my new 4runner before too late. Just sold 2019 Accord 1.5 turbo. That sucks
True, the 1.5 is a mess
We have a 2001 Pontiac Grand Prix with turbo charger. On our trip to ND two years ago we averaged 35 mph. We never lacked for power over the high altitude passes or avoiding traffic with power when necessary. Our problem is the electronics controlling the defrost mechanism. We cannot find someone to fix it and often have to resort to manual means. I understand that many cars of our vintage are abandoned because they are not worth fixing. As the Electric Vehicles increases I can tell you that the circuits for control are subject to vibration, moisture and corrosion. Often total replacement is the only fix and the cost is more than the car is worth. Just like the battery pack on the Prius. The best car I ever owned the drove was a Cad Seville with the turbocharged V8. If I had a few beers after work and drove home 15 blocks on the back roads, the horn would start honking and the lights flashing. The problem was a sealed module mounted on the wall between the trunk and back seat. The drain from the moon roof was plugged creating a pond under the rear seat. I sold it for $300 bucks cash. I now have a 2001 Toyota Tacoma 2wd pickup without modules on the a/c , heat and wipers. I sort of miss elect windows, cruise and auto transmission but, it might be my last vehicle and I can trust it to get me home for dinner.
Speaking of turbos, I saw a yellow 02 Z3 M roadster with appears to look like a huge 80MM turbo sticking out of its hood and it was just cruising by
Very cool indeed
In Fiat Ducato Vans with 2.3 liter diesel engines they suggest 48,000 km between the services!
I made an oil service in my X3 20d 2008 recently, and after resetting the "calculator" it suggest 30,000 km to the next oil service!
Too long in my opinion
I don't own turbo charged cars, But if I did I would Change the oil NO less than every 5,000 miles with Amsoil Full Synthetic oil, Because I would drive it hard of course 🤓. I hear Honda has solved the oil dilution problem with better oil and some minor design changes, Don't know if that's true yet, I guess time will tell.
For sure time will tell on the Hondas. The added performance sure is great.
Useful clip as always .Do you think a 3 cylinder GDI turbo engine would last at least 200k if you generally drive below 3000 rpm and practice good driving habits you explained such as
1. not pushing the engine till its fully warmed up,
2. Idling the engine before shutdown.
3. Using a quality full synthetic oil and changing oil at 5k miles or 6 months. I love my little turbo but am paranoid about its long term durability.
Why "or six months" Oil does not go bad just sitting there in the pan.
@@davenone7312actually it does. Because there's airspace inside the engine which is open to the atmosphere. Expansion and contraction can change the air, and the air contains moisture which can condense and contaminate the oil.
Great video Mark, whats your take on a 2009 Porsche Turbo PDK, the last year of the highly successfully Metzger engine
Absolutely, 100 percent a go for me. Arguably the best generation. Of 911 turbo. The Metzger GT1 dry sump is true racer, manual or PDK are great, but avoid earlier Tip as it takes some of the special away. The more modern type headlights. Simpler a a bit more robust than later turbos.
@@ECPP
Thanks Mark apologize for the same question on a different video.
As always terrific coverage and have saved me from harming my wallet.
I have a 2016 1.5t civic 150,000 been a great car so far
Good stuff
Turbo lag is so 1980s the turbos today are either ran by the computer so there isn't much lag
What's the comparison between Turbocharging and Supercharging, as far as shopping for cars goes? And reliability. I know both technically reduce the lifespan of the engine, but I'd figure that Superchargers are a bit easier on the engine.
hello i have a question about turbo 4 cylinder engines . are they capable of long term reliability when only driven short distances ?
It’s hard for me to get good mileage in my 2019 benz because I love the performance of the turbo coupled with the direct inject 4 cyl engine
They can be fun indeed
We as a nation should demand the reduction of over-engineered vehicles. Why do we need plastic push buttons (that require chips) for starter, parking brake, transmission drive/reverse select , windows, seats, mirrors, etc? We got lazy. We should demand BASICS, QUALITY and SAFETY only AND an End to Dealerships, and an End of Turbo's. Gas Hybrids are still the only acceptable future mandate until hydrogen is perfected. PHEV and Electric are just stupid as the electrical grid cannot handle millions of them; plus, they will burn your garage/house down.
Yes it’s reliable, especially with Lexus NX 350 f sport (so I have it one) and also it single turbocharged 4 cylinder with 8 speed automatic transmission , and this is a major playing the game with Lexus 😁😁😁😁
Cheers
Have the 2020 Honda Accord with the 1.5 turbo. Average 37.6 mpg.Rarely any short drives. Mostly highway. Oil changes when maintenance minder says oil has 40% life left...which is usually around 7000 miles. So far so good...knock wood.
Good plan just stay on top of oil changes
Depends what your using them for, if your going like a teen with a lead foot, then its going to be bad on the engine. If you buy one to help you in times of need, say trying to go up a big bridge or hill, trying to pass someone, then your going to be OK. trying any of those with a small non turbo engine and its going to be scary.
Hence the importance of premium gas on those turbo charge engine.I have a 2020 turbo charge Audi only filling up with shell v-power.
Exactly so important
I think that's all I needed to know. All in a short 10 minutes.
Thanks
You scared me a lot. I drive a civic'18 in a tropical country. Should I be worried about oil dilution. I was told it affects in the extreme cold countries only.
my mom had a 1986 Subaru XT Turbo in late 80s early 90s when me and my younger brother were kids she had the car for about 7.5 years fall 1985 to Spring 1993 until it was stolen from an auto repair shop and she bought a beater to replace it
That is old school
I have been working on cars and come to realize most of turbo cars have so many issues after 100K miles. I'd rather have natural aspirated engine over turbo any day.
what kind of issues please explain
I am looking to purchase a 2023 Toyota Sequoia or a 2023 Nissan Armada. I am concerned about the turbo engines. Is the Toyota 6 cylinder turbo in the NEW Sequoia a reliable engine or would a Nissan Armada be a better choice?
Turbos is old school.
Honda's latest 3 engine configuration in Accord and CRV is going to be much more efficient and effective in propelling a car forward fast.
I came here more for the comments than video, there will always be turb lovers and haters. IMO there's nothing wrong with a turbo charged engine a well designed & maintained turbo engine and can be very reliable. This is assuming you are not putting 20+ psi into the cylinders but I could the same for a 1,000HP NA engine. I own one with @ 260,000 miles on it that has been in the family since new and no major issues yet. Just traded in a 98,000 miled one that had zero issue throughout its life.
What about Lexus N300 it’s got Turbo it seems like solid SUV & bullet proof engine!!!
Regular maintenance 91oct your good 🤷♂️
Great Video
Alan H
Hi Mark. I am planning to buy hybrid car. And not able to decide between kia sporatge hybrid SX prestige and honda CRV hybrid sports touring. Please throw some guidance.
I've heard you speak poorly of the BMW 4.0 turbo. What are your thoughts on the AMG 4.0 V8 biturbo ?
Turbo is just an excuse to use a cheaper 4 cylinder or 6 cylinder engine rather than tried true bulletproof V8. By pushing these smaller liter engines, it pushes the engines well beyond there design limits. Hence why turbo cars often get less than 150,000 miles before detonation. Best to stick with electric hybrid car engines naturally aspirated without turbo, if you want power, fuel efficiency and longevity.
Idk. All that heat turbos create, and a bunch of plastic parts under the hood doesn't make sense to me.
That’s fair but a lot of it depends on shielding and amount of plastics parts
Turbo's suck for daily drivers. They are meant for performance cars that are not driven a lot.
They do take a bit more care and attention which can increase running costs. Especially for a daily.
I don’t know anything about cars and this is just a thought, perhaps better engine cooling can help with the turbos? Idk.
Good info., although the truth is, auto makers could care less about emissions. It's ALL about money. The only reason for emissions is because of government regulations.
is it the same with smaller engines like comparing 1.6 and 1.4T? I'm thinking a smaller engine has a better chance to be more reliable than a bigger one with turbo since it wont make as much heat, no? 🧐
Well….
Would a larger engine (i.e. a 6 or 8-banger) tend to last longer with turbo than a 4-cyl. engine? In other words, can I lessen the risk of getting a turbo engine if the engine itself is larger?
I'm good at regular maintenance and only drive hard for fun maybe once a month.
For the most part no unless this is a towing vehicle then in your scenario the larger displacement would be a better option.
Turbo chargers require more maintenance and create a lot of heat which deteriorates other parts
If you floor the pedal to keep going faster , turbos will guzzle gas.
At slow speeds they are economical.
Yes
Do some videos on the c43 amgs
You bet indeed
Turbos pump waaaaaay more adrenalin while you are wondering if this thing will ever get going, than after it goes.
Except the B58 with oil changes done at 5k Intervals 🙂
Cheers
So, if having a car with a turbo is a reliability, how concerning is it to have a car with a turbocharger and a supercharger. My Volvo 2020 V90 Inscription T6 estate has both. From the various Volvo owner forums I subscribe to I haven't noticed many complaints, but maybe my sample size is too small.
Car Master 🙏
Thanks
I plan on buying a Mazda CX 5 in December, would the regular non turbo engine be enough to get to 65 MPH when getting on the interstate from the off ramp? That's pretty much all I need.
I’ve driven both turbo and non turbo CX-5’s. The turbo is more fun, but the non-turbo has enough torque and power for everyday needs like getting on a highway just fine.
I have a 2019 CX-5 Touring and the 2.5 engine works well. This is my experience driving in SoCal and now in Omaha, Nebraska. Very reliable vehicle as well.
Thanks for answering guys! You’re gonna save me at least a couple of thousand bucks!
WHAT about a CORKSPORT RAM AIR INTAKE? I know they help the performance- but would that HURT one? Scotty Kilmer says NEVER run one.. THOUGHT?? or SUPERCHARGER???
Listen carefully , turbos belong on diesel engines and racing applications . This guy all wrong about the false sales narrative "more power and better gas mileage" . It takes "X" number of joules (work energy) to move 3000 Lbs. from zero to 60 mph in 5 seconds . Force them and they blow the gas like a V8 . THERE IS NO FREE ENERGY . Gdi engine intake valves are shedding chunks of burned coked oil through the turbine side of the rotating element causing servere unrepairable damage . This debris then plugs the catalytic converters , very expensive . I am a turbine machinist for twenty years . I make a good living from the poor customers that fall for the B/S . ALWAYS get the bigger engine . If you gave me a free turbo car , I wouldn't thank you for it , and I couldn't sell it fast enough . Avoid GDI , turbo and CVT at all cost .
Me, a 2012.Chevy cruze turbo owner attempting to learn more about turbos, knowing just how bad I hate my car, hears the exact make an model at the end of the video. I just knew it was coming... lmao.
Im learning to love my little missile. Even if I have to go back and un-do GMs engineering and use after market upgrades. Cant be mechanically stupid and poor if you own one of these damn cars lol
Haha, glad it’s working out
What do you think about the Acura integra 1.5 turbo? Old Honda engine
whoa whoa whoa, please check out my video tomorrow morning and I will share this topic with you.
@@ECPP waiting....about to put a deposit for 6-sp manual. Thanks!
smart guy he is,,,,you need turbo on race cars,,,not to go work,,,
I have a 07 Acura RDX and she is at almost 260k miles and is still all original
Cheers
She gets mobile one synthetic oil changes every 4k miles and I trust her to go anywhere she has the 2.3 turbo Honda engine I bet this engine would have been amazing in the Acura TSX paired with six speed manual
Unfortunately my 2002 Volkswagen Passat GLS has a turbo and that’s the only way you can get the 1.8 engine.
That is true, sometimes there are no options. But with a well designed system and hood parts, the turbos can go as long as the rest of the engine.
@@ECPP Agreed
great video
Thank you so much Colin. Have a wonderful weekend.
Not a turbo fan. Cost more to maintain and sound isn't that good. Also older turbo cars with turbo lag drove me nuts. NA all the way!
yyou are granpa toyota?
Cheers
I had over 700K with no problems related to the turbo on my vehicle when I sold it. 2016 Freightliner Cascadia.....
Haha, true those will run a long time
These car manufactures aren't stupid, they know they don't need to build them to be reliable. They just have to make them reliable enough to get past the warranty period. Because I want to drive my cars for a long time without undue maintenance issues, no turbo, hybrid or CVT for me.