New DRILLING Machine Unlocks Unlimited ENERGY!?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 201

  • @raffriff42
    @raffriff42 Год назад +21

    US Patent 3,693‚731 (Los Alamos, 1972) “A machine and method for drilling bore holes and tunnels by melting …and during operation of which the molten material may be disposed adjacent the boring zone in cracks in the rock and a vitreous wall lining of the tunnel so formed. The heat source can be electrical or nuclear…”

    • @nikitaw1982
      @nikitaw1982 Месяц назад

      $1.3 trillion annual spend on climate change and they've had a patent for 50 years. They could have fixed the problem many times over CC is a scam to tax co2.Everything anyone does produces co2. Global taxation scam

  • @stevechance150
    @stevechance150 Год назад +11

    Rick: "So let me guess Morty, you dropped the light saber perfectly vertical and now it's headed to the Earth's core?!"

  • @geoffgeoff143
    @geoffgeoff143 Год назад +14

    1 mw/h for how far at what diameter. That is a unit of energy, not power. You are mixing apples with millimetres.

    • @markawbolton
      @markawbolton Год назад +6

      Thank you for picking up on that. I wondered of any one wouild.... Like so many of these "Wow Man I love Science !! " the level of Literacy is abysmal. Wiht deep drilling Geothermal the thermal energy is important .. not simply the temprature of the rocks at depth. How much heat is stored in the strata. How permeable is it. Like water underground. Sure dig a well till you hit water but how much can you extract WRT to how quickly the aquifer is replenished. It is intencely irritating to me because of the Limitless Energy bandwagoning that goes on ..so much snake oil ... When we need a lot more energy than we have now e will need a technology that will work not just a Marketing Scam.

    • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n Год назад +3

      @@markawbolton You mentioned literacy, the ability to read and write. But you don't read what you've written and this is a mess.

    • @Tech_Planet
      @Tech_Planet  Год назад +2

      Yes, good point! It's compared to a 21 cm/ 8 inch hole. It's all-in estimate of the cost per megawatt-hour (MWh) but they are using 1 MWh gyrotron so it's probably a low number. GA Drilling already changed their numbers multiple times so I don't like throwing straight technical comparisons, so I tried basing it on the minimum energy requirements/geothermal well diameters to give people an idea.

    • @maliq4
      @maliq4 4 месяца назад +1

      @@Tech_Planet See, you've done it again. I think you may not be qualified for this field. You said in the video "... hundreds of megawatts per hour..." - this makes no sense. Like @markawbolton said above, you are confusing energy and power units. And now you did it again, in reverse, by saying "1MWh gyrotron". Gyrotrons are rated on their power, not an amount of energy. You are clearly reading these figures from somewhere and then mis-stating them here.

  • @ag135i
    @ag135i Год назад +16

    Only a cone shaped carbide drill can reach the maximum distance possible but we will need to constantly replace them and try to keep them cool, replacing the drill head again and again is the biggest challenge.

    • @fredd629
      @fredd629 Год назад +3

      They have had carbide drill heads that can with stand 500degree Temps for a decade at least .

    • @DaveEtchells
      @DaveEtchells Год назад +1

      Interesting, I didn’t know they could handle that much heat. My impression has been that the microwave approach could potentially be much faster. I’d think they would just use microwaves all the way down, but maybe the cost per unit of depth is higher than conventional rotary drilling until you hit a certain depth.
      (As you mention, on deep holes changing the bit is the huge bottleneck; they need to pull out and disassemble the whole drill stack, replace the head, then reassemble and lower it back down. I wonder how long that takes for, say, a 2km hole? Anyone know?

    • @TimDavies1955
      @TimDavies1955 Год назад

      Needs plasma cutting to 10miles

    • @fredd629
      @fredd629 Год назад +2

      @@DaveEtchells My friend worked for a lubricant distributor that serviced industry including mining and oil drillers .He would give me from time to time the Trade Magazines to read. This is where I read about the New High Temp drilling heads .That was at least Decade ago.

    • @josephdelp87
      @josephdelp87 Год назад

      Russia tried it. The bit wouldn't go any further not even a cm.

  • @terryspeicher9953
    @terryspeicher9953 Год назад +6

    In the 70s NASA developed a ceramic heated to great temperatures that simply melted its way down pushing material to the side making a glass bore as it went down -though I haven't see references to it in years-- seemed like a great idea and was elegant in its simplicity

  • @charlesblithfield6182
    @charlesblithfield6182 Год назад +6

    Right off the bat I’m curious what the payback time is for the more intense methods, both economic payback and in terms of energy expended vs energy generated.

  • @y0uCantHandle
    @y0uCantHandle Год назад +7

    Scotty, set phasers to maximum!

  • @benmcreynolds8581
    @benmcreynolds8581 Год назад +11

    I really hope we can advance our drilling technology to utilize those laser/plasma ideas that harden up the bore hole wall as it goes. If we can get Styropyro to collaborate with certain people, who knows? Maybe laser, plasma tech is possible to see advancement here soon. Lol

  • @robevans2114
    @robevans2114 Год назад +5

    I wonder if we could drill next to existing power plants whose energy could be used when excess power is available?

    • @jupiler02
      @jupiler02 9 месяцев назад

      Yes, as far as I understood, this is possible and use the existing power plants.

  • @venturefanatic9262
    @venturefanatic9262 Год назад +5

    How about drilling a hole in deep ocean floor over a thinner crustal area. Install Sterling Engines using the Deep Cold Ocean to offset the heat from such a deep bore hole. No Steam or Pluming needed.

    • @ag135i
      @ag135i Год назад +3

      Equipment can't easily survive at such depths because of intense weight and pressure of water over it maybe that's why it's still not being tried.

    • @jean-claudefrancoisbaroudd730
      @jean-claudefrancoisbaroudd730 4 месяца назад

      The salt in the water is really a problem for maintenance

  • @janewray-mccann2133
    @janewray-mccann2133 Год назад +5

    Replace the tungsten carbide inserts with osmiridium for starters as it will take the enormous heat generated by extreme deep holes. The bit itself should be manufactured with titanium steel. We have the technology to replace bits in the hole already but the real problem with geo thermal holes is to keep them clear as the steam generated is not just steam it is most often a composite of deleterious solutions such as calcium and barium which inevitably clogs the annulus reducing the steam pressure. Keep at it all the same. Excellent vid.

    • @__WJK__
      @__WJK__ 10 месяцев назад

      Seems they should be able to keep the holes clean, by re-running the plasma/lasers down the bore, as needed.

  • @chuckaddison5134
    @chuckaddison5134 Год назад +3

    Waveguide is easy, it's been made since about WW2. Millimeter wave generating equipment is pretty commonplace too. Both are everyday items in the military inventories.
    The challenges are going to be the temperatures around and aft of the drill head. Molten rock AKA lava is about the same temperature that steel melts at. So it will take some pretty expensive alloys to do this.
    Not impossible just challenging. Assuming the power requirements are not understated.

    • @vylbird8014
      @vylbird8014 Год назад +1

      Millimeter wave generating equipment, yes. But at the power levels needed for this, not so much - you're going to need about a megawatt of output. Doable, yes, but lots of custom heavy engineering to make not just the gyrotron but also the power supply for it.

    • @atlet1
      @atlet1 Год назад

      @@vylbird8014 what about coolingen and tungsten or other heat resistant skin?

  • @kirikset
    @kirikset Год назад +4

    When you say "it consumes 1MWhour", i think you are using incorrect units. It is "1MW", no need to add hours to power consumption.

  • @defiant18
    @defiant18 Год назад +3

    There was a guy in USA who developed a high pressure steam drill. He built a working version that drilled thru a metre of granite in a few minutes

  • @douginorlando6260
    @douginorlando6260 Год назад +17

    Low cost tunneling would be a huge game changer. Urban regions could eliminate the need for surface roads. Water transportation under mountain ranges could turn deserts into farmland gardens while avoiding pumping water thousands of feet vertical.

    • @a-a-ron4679
      @a-a-ron4679 Год назад

      The people in NYC may disagree with you at this very moment.

    • @bazoo513
      @bazoo513 Год назад

      @@a-a-ron4679 Why?

    • @a-a-ron4679
      @a-a-ron4679 Год назад

      @@bazoo513 because the city is or was flooded. That’s why

    • @bazoo513
      @bazoo513 Год назад

      @@a-a-ron4679 Flooding or not, NYC _depends_ on tunnels, for everything from potable water to sewer to steam to comm cables to subway. And some of them are _very_ deep.

    • @a-a-ron4679
      @a-a-ron4679 Год назад

      @@bazoo513 yeah I know

  • @stever197037
    @stever197037 Год назад +3

    Graphine conducts heat over a long distance with little loss almost instantly.
    Just transfer the heat from deep for power.
    No need for turbines with a large bank of Themo electric generators.

    • @vylbird8014
      @vylbird8014 Год назад +2

      TEGs have crap efficiency compared to turbines. They do have their uses - they have near-perfect reliability, happy to operate for decades without servicing - but their efficiency is awful.

    • @stever197037
      @stever197037 Год назад

      @@vylbird8014 yes but turbines require a lot hotter water or high pressure steam. A teg can make power with less.

    • @methylene5
      @methylene5 4 месяца назад

      You need to learn the relationship between thermodynamics and efficiency. Peltier junctions (TEGs) are notoriously inefficient.

  • @robertgaines-tulsa
    @robertgaines-tulsa Год назад +2

    I hope this new energy based drilling technology takes off. We need more energy tech if we are to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and have more environmentally friendly tech. Nuclear bothers too many people and isn't cheap. If by some miracle fusion works, it will likely be fore expensive as well. Geothermal is a really good answer to all this.

  • @AlaskaSlay
    @AlaskaSlay 3 месяца назад +1

    What happens if you hit water? North of the Alaska range around Fairbanks, its almost impossible drill without punching through a significant layer of ground water at some point. Just curious if it would function going through ground water

  • @col.johnson9938
    @col.johnson9938 Год назад +3

    just love the fact that humans continue to find ways to to destroy the planet in order to make their lives better. Instead of working with what is at hand

  • @africanelectron751
    @africanelectron751 Год назад +2

    You could absolutely use diesel generators to generate 8mw. Might take a few trucks to deliver them and fuel them tho.

    • @vylbird8014
      @vylbird8014 Год назад +2

      Could. But then, if you're drilling for geothermal power, you're going to have to run a high-capacity grid connection to the site anyway to get the power out. Might as well just use that to power the drill.

  • @timkahn2813
    @timkahn2813 Год назад +3

    everything can be used up over time. but this is the second biggest source we have . the sun being number one . i dont count wind . although its said to be 300 time more from off shore wine then we now need.

    • @Mallchad
      @Mallchad Год назад +1

      there's lots of energy in wind but it's super hard to capture and induces a lot of mechanical stress hence why we chase things like photo-voltaic cells
      Solar and geothermal is the only thing any self respecting Type-1 civilisation would use with nuclear fusion and fission where needed

  • @barabolak
    @barabolak Год назад +5

    I bet they have gigantic nuclear drilling devices that are capable of making entire cities under the ground

    • @everettstormy
      @everettstormy Год назад

      There was a Russian nuclear mole that could travel under ground really quickly. They supposedly stopped the project

    • @barabolak
      @barabolak Год назад

      @@everettstormy russians make A LOT of stuff up. They're great liars historically and currently

  • @XimCines
    @XimCines Год назад +1

    I stepped on this technology im April this year and thought it was a big deal.
    Making electricity from geothermal from almost any place in the world would be the most efficient and green way of generating electricity.
    Solar panels are not reliable and uses rare materials.
    Wind are also a problem in material issues.
    Nuclear is good but people hate it.
    This can be what we need to help our planet alongside with artificial photosyntesis for carbon capture.

  • @kastenolsen9577
    @kastenolsen9577 Год назад +1

    Look at the technologies like the Rodin Coil, The Spatial Resonance Induction Transformer, or the Crystal Energy Generator that have been supressed.

  • @tejishtosh1491
    @tejishtosh1491 Год назад +2

    This idea i imagined when I was in college , but in my idea there is a slice difference that was to drill near to a volcano 🌋 to get enough heat for steam generation 😅

  • @themacker894
    @themacker894 Год назад +2

    Nice job and excellent analysis.

  • @KJAJOBRIEN
    @KJAJOBRIEN 2 месяца назад

    Remember that directional core bore drilling was very expensive at it's inception. Today, it's so cost effective that it's everywhere.

  • @michaeljames5936
    @michaeljames5936 3 дня назад

    I fear we may be too late, but I've been watching Geo-thermal for the past few years, and I think it will be our biggest energy source in 15 - 20 years. NB We still need all the promise of fusion to come true, to have any hope of trying to repair the damage.

  • @That_Freedom_Guy
    @That_Freedom_Guy Год назад +1

    Very nice! Non contact drilling. Excellent!👍🏻

  • @eclipsos8187
    @eclipsos8187 5 месяцев назад

    Easy solution. Find location that has high geothermal gradient. Get mobile nuclear powerplant which we already have on aircraft carriers. Build a cooling tower real quick as there obviously no ocean. Then use nuclear powerplant to drill in one spot and make a plant. Check energy efficiency. Keep drilling in nearby areas using nuclear plant. Once energy needs are met use already existing geothermal plants to provide energy for continue drilling in local. Move nuclear plant to new area and repeat.
    At that point the energy drilling mechanism can be scaled up for more rapid drilling. Sell energy cheaply to local. Become monopoly basically guarenteed.

  • @hu5116
    @hu5116 Год назад +2

    I think these ideas are all on the right track but each has detractors. Some combination of techniques might prove useful

  • @YouT-DJ
    @YouT-DJ Год назад +1

    One of the aspirations of many a scifi story. Some day. What about gas pockets and extreme back pressure?

  • @WeTheLittlePeople
    @WeTheLittlePeople Год назад +1

    Awesome. Dreaming one day of someone pouring waste water contaminates into a geo-thermal pocket to remove the waste, recover the water vapor and turn it all into energy and remove pollution with the same system. Should be doable. Advances in ceramic pipes would help.

  • @iancormie9916
    @iancormie9916 Год назад +1

    One has to wonder how they would stabilize the wellbore when they go deep. One also has to wonder what will happen when they hit very porous water wet zones.

  • @anttikuisma6283
    @anttikuisma6283 8 месяцев назад

    Great video. Thank you. Im 100% sure that geothermal will have big role in our future energy production. We will see huge development in the are of drilling technology.

  • @mitseraffej5812
    @mitseraffej5812 Год назад +8

    Nothing is unlimited, not even the heat/ energy contained within the earth. Possibly unlimited in terms of human civilisation but it seems that whatever humanity does has some unforeseen consequence. When the Industrial Revolution began I’m sure no one every dreamt of the damage that burning fossil fuels would end up doing. At the time we had very little knowledge of how fragile the planet’s atmosphere and oceans were.
    I think a cool apocalyptic movie would be how humanity sucked so much energy out of the earths core that it solidified and the magnetic field turned off. Slowly the atmosphere was blown off by the solar wind and we all lived in pressurised houses with reticulated air. To bad if you can’t afford to pay the monthly bill.

  • @paulflute
    @paulflute Год назад +1

    seems to me that a large power requirement should be irrelevant if the purpose of the whole ti access near unlimited free safe power..
    sounds like ti will pay for itself fairly quickly ...???

  • @STYX-a-Lot
    @STYX-a-Lot 2 месяца назад

    Love it… At whatever costs it takes to drill a hole for each neighborhood… Once it’s done, we all got free power. I had conceived a way to use a zirconium dioxide pipe with a u-turn on the bottom of it to go to the bottom of the ocean and dip into the magma all along the oceanic ridge where tectonic plates separate, and heat from magma is near the surface. It would be like a coffee percolator, or thermal siphon. Water going in the pipe would be 40,000 psi but would never reach the surface of the ocean because it turns to hyper sonic steam. Theoretically you could separate hydrogen and oxygen via thermolysis. Or, create electricity and use electrolysis. Sand entering the pipe could form fiberglass pipelines by a centrifuge that could head for the continents. Clean water could be stored as high as 1 mile above the ocean in giant bowls of frothed glass for clean water pressure to be used on land. Also to power homes by water pressure. The salt removed would be added as the water returns to the ocean once it has filled the rivers etc. no more energy shortage, and no more water shortage. Unusable amounts of hydrogen fuel etc. Artificial Geysers if you will that can form themselves without human intervention. Also, floating islands of foamed glass that produce energy by the tides. People could move onto the snow white mountainous islands and enjoy homes carved out of the foamed glass. The ultimate pipe dream. Floating sky islands made of sea gel foam the float high in the sky to gather enormous static electricity and blot out the harmful rays of the sun could also create rain, or stop it. You could literally reverse the footprint of man by adding ice to the polar ice caps etc. maybe A.I. can work out the details. A.I. could also figure a way to use hummingbird muscle cells to wrap around a shaft and make motors that run on sugar water, and electric impulses. This way people could have high pressure inflatable wings made of graphene that roll up instantly in a wearable backpack so you just think about flying, and you are. I used to daydream a lot….hmmmm.

  • @SrenelyDiscord
    @SrenelyDiscord Год назад +1

    It should have been our #1 development after sending man to the moon.

  • @JoshMarshain
    @JoshMarshain 3 месяца назад

    Glad we're at least trying stuff, we kinda have to, my concern is how many locations are ideal for this to work without causing dangerous knock-on effects, even if successful.

  • @theretrogamer5843
    @theretrogamer5843 Год назад +1

    What would be the implications of removing that much heat energy from the crust?

    • @maneatingduck
      @maneatingduck Год назад +1

      None. The heat is replenished from the earth's magma layer (mantle), and there is _a lot_ of it, with a practically inexhaustible supply of heat energy. If you compare it to emptying the ocean with a shot glass, this would have a lot less impact than that :)

  • @alberthartl8885
    @alberthartl8885 7 месяцев назад

    GA drilling's plasmabit is directional so would be complementary to Eavor's design. Quaise Energy requires a straight line. They just go deeper to get the heat required.

  • @victoryfirst2878
    @victoryfirst2878 Год назад +2

    I like the video fella. The problem is TALK IS CHEAP. No one want to make anything to buck the system. I would bet that the petroleum industry will do everything in there power to stop this from happening. The most corrupt entity on the earth.

    • @thebigdog2295
      @thebigdog2295 Год назад +1

      They're already doing it now, when's the last time you heard of a hydroelectric dam being built. Somewhere on this platform is a documentary about the last man who built a geothermal power plant, and the lengths he had to go through to get it built. Big oil isn't the only ones doing it. The big electric companies have do their best to keep new sources from being built. Look up what they did with the Tennessee Valley Authority, only a small percentage of dams were built with power plants, just to keep prices up.

  • @ahmetmutlu348
    @ahmetmutlu348 Год назад +1

    I think main problem is keeping the line open as heat will clog te pipe... anyway new archiewements/upgrades in this technology will help making wenus's potential energy accessible... whch i guess has extreme potential as its surface is too hot and upper atmosphere is too cold... or night side... i think vens has more potential then mars... as its bigger as 2 adventages ower mas ie too high an too cold place which meand energy 😊 and lots of chemcals that can be used for lots of things ..

  • @cfalletta7220
    @cfalletta7220 Год назад +2

    You know I agree with all of these clean energy methods but the problem is that the oil companies have a very strong grip on the government and as soon as hurt the pocketbooks the more they are not going to transition to clean energy systems even if it is possible ✌️❤️👍

  • @13thbiosphere
    @13thbiosphere 9 месяцев назад

    Consider the possibility of heating a tungsten drill bit to 3,000 Celsius

  • @srotovnikabc6919
    @srotovnikabc6919 Год назад +1

    It would be more reasonable to find a practically usable heat accumulator from summer to winter than to risk further problems with the consequences of drilling.

  • @snorfallupagus6014
    @snorfallupagus6014 Год назад +1

    Deeper...faster...deeper..faster.Deeper.Faster!

  • @jepleas9159
    @jepleas9159 9 месяцев назад

    Eavor is drilling deep with advanced conventional drilling equipment and expects their first commercial geothermal plant to start operating in 2024.

  • @l0I0I0I0
    @l0I0I0I0 Год назад +1

    Im interested but the first thing I would want to know is, the company owner and management trurthy or will they cheat you? Thats most important to me.

  • @BallBusta
    @BallBusta 9 месяцев назад

    Honestly, if no company is willing to out drill the kola superdeep borehole, I don't foresee geothermal energy production exploding into the future any time soon.

  • @UberMick
    @UberMick Год назад +1

    What happens if they hit an LNG pocket?

  • @historyisfake9153
    @historyisfake9153 Год назад +1

    Phil shnieder was talking bout these in his area 51 speeches.
    Another link proving he's right xxx

  • @unpopuIaropinion
    @unpopuIaropinion Год назад +2

    Lately everyone is supposedly caring about global warming. Have you thought about the implications of this energy source ?

    • @theotherandrew5540
      @theotherandrew5540 Год назад +1

      The implications of this energy source are that fossil fuelled power plants can be directly converted to using geothermal steam to run their generators by displacing the need for fossil fuel.

  • @Chobaca
    @Chobaca 9 месяцев назад +1

    Retrofit every coal power plant on earth with geo thermal is what I think

  • @luzi29
    @luzi29 Месяц назад

    I hope there will be investment into this technology as it seems to be the only truly sustainable solutions for replacing hydrocarbons. Especially as it serves for electricity generation and be used as heat source for homes and industry 24/7

  • @jonnyfatboy7563
    @jonnyfatboy7563 Год назад +1

    the US military's 1,000+ kilowatt laser should do the trick then 😅

  • @autohypnotic6750
    @autohypnotic6750 4 месяца назад

    Wave guides don't need to be straight. Think fiber optics. I think the main problem would be the vaporized rock liquefying the bore hole on the way up.

  • @gijoe41688
    @gijoe41688 Год назад +2

    how is the holes cleared of debris?

    • @truetech4158
      @truetech4158 Год назад

      By squeezing them, like a pimple that is miles deep until the very long strand of spaghetti reaches its entirety, but then after that is removed, a fountain of endless fire pours out until the plastic surgeons move in and seal it up, like that one time when brad pitt had that major pimple that required surgical intervention.

    • @alberthartl8885
      @alberthartl8885 7 месяцев назад

      The rock is vaporized so it leaves the bore as a gas.

    • @michael-vl1mn
      @michael-vl1mn 6 месяцев назад

      The vapourised rock is transported up the hole using high-pressure Argon.

  • @martialbroussard8028
    @martialbroussard8028 Год назад +1

    HOW WOULD YOU BSTEER THESE HOOKUPS IN DIRECTIONAL HOLES?

  • @plummyplumage
    @plummyplumage Год назад

    @4:12 "very interesting machine because it's *a very high interest diffusion research* so it's definitely interesting to see an offset technology be used in drilling but more importantly it only consumes about *one megawatt hour*" (emphasis added).
    Do you simply mean that diffusion research is interesting? (I wouldn't ask if I didn't agree with what that apparently means.)
    Did you mean to say one megawatt /per/ hour?

  • @animeswitch
    @animeswitch Год назад

    lmfao its like the movie core

  • @bazoo513
    @bazoo513 Год назад

    3:33 - I nitpick like this only on good videos: "hundreds of megawatts per hour" makes no sense. Either "hundreds of MW" (power) or "hundreds of MWh each hour" (energy). As the former implies the latter, it would be preferred. Similar, "it only consumes about one MWh" around 4_24; "it only needs about one MW" or "it only consumes about one MWh per hour"; preferably the former.
    Why is it that some, even technically savvy people, keep confusing power and energy ?

  • @vandalorian8777
    @vandalorian8777 Год назад +1

    Isn’t this how the planet Krypton exploded?

    • @michael-vl1mn
      @michael-vl1mn 6 месяцев назад

      Krypton is a fictional planet it does not exist in the universe we exist in.

  • @Patiboke
    @Patiboke Год назад

    This is not about the drilling tech, but I'm afraid if they would harvest lots and lots of geothermal energy it would significantly cool down the Earths crust and some of the liquid mantle underneath would become solid. Now you have a thicker crust, so more time between earthquakes but more powerful earthquakes. It wouldn't happen soon but look at what we've done with CO2...

  • @NekoNinja13
    @NekoNinja13 Год назад +1

    sounds like the oil/gas industries worst nightmare im certain it will go swimmingly and publicly yield great results, and definitely wont be sabotaged, legally bound and inoperable for years, and or silently "forgotten" so that people dont remember to ask where their infinite and affordable energy is 🙃

  • @shahidnazirgujjar6510
    @shahidnazirgujjar6510 Год назад

    Geothermal energy extraction through ABONDEND OIL AND GAS AND GAS AND GAS WELLS through closed loop system

  • @Etheoma
    @Etheoma 3 месяца назад

    Dude, I don't think you realize how expensive the machine could be and it still be amazingly economically viable, assuming they can get 75MW from a single hole 75MW of natural gas would cost $322.5 per second given the cost of natural gas at wholesale is 0.0043 USD per kWh which in a year would cost 10.17 billion USD in natural gas.
    Assuming quaise's machine can last 5 years of operation, with maintenance doubling that cost, a 20% margin and it takes them 100 days to drill a 20km hole like they claim, they could dig 18.25 holes before the machine died. Also assuming that investors would like to see a return on investment within a year which is pretty accurate the machine could cost 74.2 billion investors would be investing in building geothermal plants because it would offer a return on investment of almost 2x in a year because it's half the cost of natural gas per kWh, and for every year after that you being 10.17 billion USD better off than building a natural gas power plant.
    WITH THE MACHINE COSTING 74.2 BILLION, the machine can be expensive, it's fine.

  • @markdavis8888
    @markdavis8888 3 месяца назад

    Drilling holes in the Earth has caused much trouble

  • @johnssmith4005
    @johnssmith4005 Год назад

    Don't dig too deep guys or else you'll wake the Balrog

  • @owenwilson25
    @owenwilson25 Год назад

    Italy is just 3km on top of a bulging supervolcano that could/will kill all humans in the northern hemisphere, or power all Europe for the next ten thousand years (a potential win win for Italy & Europe)

  • @stormbringermornblade8811
    @stormbringermornblade8811 Год назад +6

    you know the EPA or some such will jack this in courts for ever.

  • @arthurzettel6618
    @arthurzettel6618 Год назад

    For some strange reason something is telling me that this is a bad idea geothermally and geologically.

  • @53022347
    @53022347 Год назад

    Dig a hole like this in Yellowstone or Tambora and see what happens.

    • @michael-vl1mn
      @michael-vl1mn 8 месяцев назад +1

      ONLY A TRUMP SUPPORTER WOULD BE SO SILLY

  • @TheDrackOfSpades
    @TheDrackOfSpades 2 месяца назад

    ROCK AND STONE!

  • @bazoo513
    @bazoo513 Год назад

    We should now shy from high cost of these technologies. We need reliable base load power - it is either this or nuclear. As strong proponent of nuclear energy I might be, I cannot ignore the fact that most of cost lowering promises of SMR are yet to materialize, and (trans) continental transmission grids and utility scale energy storage needed tp wind and solar to play that role are expensive. too, with the former also being politically vulnerable.
    In the end, we will need _everything,_ from conventional gigawatt-scale fission reactors all the way down to residential solar with perhap 100kWh worth of storage.

  • @Zindo.Majesty.HisMajesty
    @Zindo.Majesty.HisMajesty Год назад

    Not sure we should be putting holes that far down.

  • @kevinbrowndc
    @kevinbrowndc Год назад

    Power with SMR?

  • @alterbart7916
    @alterbart7916 Год назад +2

    Power of hundreds of megawatt *PER HOUR* ?😅🤣😂😅🤣😂😅🤣😂

  • @richarddechatfield2297
    @richarddechatfield2297 12 дней назад

    could building road and train tunnels.

  • @johnschmidbauer1659
    @johnschmidbauer1659 Год назад

    We don’t hear about this in the news………. Many if the mainstream would push geothermal and not useless windmills.

    • @michael-vl1mn
      @michael-vl1mn 6 месяцев назад +1

      A windmill is used to mill grain, it is not a useful description to describe wind turbines as windmils.

    • @johnschmidbauer1659
      @johnschmidbauer1659 6 месяцев назад

      Thank god the engineers showed up. Haha😂

  • @banto1
    @banto1 Год назад

    But we were always told that a nuclear power plant could meltdown and it would create a hole through the earth, reaching china. They even made a movie with Jane Fonda called the China Syndrome to make everyone believe it was true. Shouldn't we just get Jane to show us how to build a nuclear power plant that can make these holes a lot easier than drilling or using fancy lasers?

  • @jamiebee1642
    @jamiebee1642 7 месяцев назад

    V.I.R.G.I.L is the 🐐 of all drills.
    The Core, one of the best terrible movies that's worth watching.

  • @polarper8165
    @polarper8165 5 месяцев назад

    Geothermal is the future

  • @Kakalacki
    @Kakalacki 5 месяцев назад

    And if you could drill in an existing coal plant you already have the infrastructure in place

  • @lincolnrock9158
    @lincolnrock9158 Год назад

    Please investigate thunderstorms generator. Doubles fuel. 0. Carbon. Put on any engine

    • @Tech_Planet
      @Tech_Planet  Год назад

      I'm looking into it right now, thanks!

  • @The1stDukeDroklar
    @The1stDukeDroklar Год назад

    I think it would be a much better investment than fusion which is pie-in-the-sky.

  • @alexanderchenf1
    @alexanderchenf1 Год назад

    If geothermal is truly to be exploited, Hawaii will replace Texas as the energy hub.

  • @fesquemonkey9784
    @fesquemonkey9784 Год назад

    NASA already doing @ Yellowstone

  • @RoboArc
    @RoboArc Год назад +1

    Drilling is old, plasma would be bad fkn ass 😂 it would also be a very straight hole. Think a CNC EDM robot but as a drill.
    I say we do it, but we need a way to make power better 😎 need more Kv

  • @SubmitTheKraken
    @SubmitTheKraken Год назад

    Wait. They want to drill a hole to the earth's core? Right?

  • @viniciusnoyoutube
    @viniciusnoyoutube 10 месяцев назад

    If it can generate a enormous amount of energy, the spend of a very amount of electricity is justified and paid back in some years.

  • @vg23air
    @vg23air Год назад

    yay, lets vent the geothermal and cool the core of the planet, and see what happens next, yay, lets dill petroleum out of the planet and burn it and see what happens next

  • @cirocko1
    @cirocko1 Год назад

    Hard to beat nuclear, thats the future

  • @YordanGeorgiev
    @YordanGeorgiev 2 месяца назад

    Jee why this area is so underinvested?

  • @alphauno6614
    @alphauno6614 9 месяцев назад

    Why don't we just pour water in volcanos and make steam that way?

  • @Etheoma
    @Etheoma 3 месяца назад

    Ah dude, you should have went with UNLIMITED POWER!!! in the tile, such a wasted opportunity.

  • @배창희-n7n
    @배창희-n7n 11 месяцев назад

    대단한 아이디어 입니다

  • @KennethC43
    @KennethC43 Год назад

    Leave it up to humans to make boiling water complicated.

  • @Nehmo
    @Nehmo Год назад

    Anybody who gets watts and watt-hours confused isn't well-versed on the subject.