RUclips Shadow Banning again Please share, like and comment to break the Algorithm Tell us, where you’re watching from? Brothers and Sisters! Please Like, Comment and Share the video to help us reach more people so you can share in the reward in sha Allah! *SUPPORT DAWAHWISE* ❤www.patreon.com/dawahwise ❤gofund.me/dba0c96f ❤www.paypal.me/dawahwise ❤Join DawahWise Membership: ruclips.net/user/DawahWisejoin
@@DawahWise New York City. The disbelief will not stop pestering true Faith thinking it can sway it to consider disbelief and accept it as something noble. Nay!
Stopped watching video when the guy with hat and glasses said that countries tolerance and growth is because of secularism. Not really true. Infact he's wrong. Hinduism has pretty good proven tolerance to multitude of beliefs and ideas, compared to Islam and christianity which only accepts one belief. It is the culture and not the constitution itself. It is the poor choice of government policy that China is economically more developed than India. Turkey also is secular, but are there any significant visible minorities and their beliefs there except christianity. The answer is NO.
I'm an Indian-Tamilian too as he is. This guy speak out of pure ignorance. Even if the growth/development of India is coming out of culture/tradition as he claimed, yet it's nothing to do with Hinduism/ Islam/Christianity or any other religion. All the people irrespective of their faith are contributing to the nation's development. The hindutva is spreading a false information which is believed by most Hindus that the country was thriving before Mughal/British invasions, which was actually not. There were very negligible percentage of people who are kings or some wealthy landlords who were rich and thriving. The majority was struggling for food and suffering poverty. Same as now, the development they claim is just a very minor percentage of people businesses men/ IT professionals/ etc.. are having enough wealth, the majority are suffering even for the three times food. Only a few states of India are performing good in nation's development, the reat majority states are struggling. Unemployment rate is skyrocketing in the country. They are just simply obsessed with Pakistan, that's it. Pakistan is anything and everything for them. They don't think beyond that. All they see is, we are not in as bad situation as Pakistan, then they feel content.
Hi. I don't disagree with your summary bro, but I want to know what happened to India, because 20 to 25+ years ago this obsession about Pakistan didn't exist. What changed ?
U summarize a long fact in a very brief way.. MashaAllah I m 100 percent agree with ur each and every word..they r highly obsessed with Pakistan..they don't think beyond this.
@@SlimDonni Answer in one sentence is "BJP wants power + RSS wants to eliminate Muslims" for this both to happen, this collab took a tool "Pakistan". And the followers of both are executing the orders.
I want ask this Hindu brother one question, Nepal got freedom 1923 and it is a Hindu or a Hindu Majority Country. Why Nepal is so poor? If Hinduism is the factor for India's growth WHY HINDUISM can't play a role Nepal's economic growth or any sort of development? And Bangladesh is ahead of Nepal getting independence in 1923 when Bangladesh in 1971. I wonder if his hate towards Islam has allowed him to looked at the bigger picture. This guy conveniently just ignored China when they got their independence in 1949 but it wont fit his narrative. And how in the world I do not see anyone talking about how British stole from India over $45 Trillions, they were Christians but again not fitting his narrative so just ignore it and blame it on the Mugals. As a matter of fact in Hindu scripter Mugal King were being called Bhramhin Brothers. And adding up to who did harm India? No one has hurt India and Indian society more than Hindu Bhrambhins. If a society preaching follows Gautama Dharmasūtra (12:4-6 according to one numbering, 2:3:4 according to another) to this effect: “4 And if he listens in on a vedic recitation, his ears shall be filled with molten tin or lac; 5 if he repeats it, his tongue shall be cut off; 6 if he commits it to memory, his body shall be split asunder.” (Translation Patrick Olivelle, Dharmasūtras: The law codes of ancient India, OUP, 1999, p.98) I can go on and on and on how Bramhans being a tiney tiny part of the population oppressed Sudras over thousands of years and it's all over Hindu scripters. He is so dishonest he blame Muslims and Islam. I can clearly see, he is trying so hard to be J Sai Deepak another Hindu extremist and propagandist. And to conclude, Pakistan's fall not because of Islam: it is rather falling apart from Islamic values and culture as a whole.
India is not a single nation. It is an aggregation of multiple nation states that were forced together by the Christian British, an enforced aggregation perpetuated by hindutva nationalism.
Yeah and tbh the most developed part of India is the southern region who do not consider religion as a priority... Tamil Nadu for example has an atheist party that has dominated the politics of TN for the past 60 years.....
India does 2-3 things good: "saar, that is because we are Hindu nation" India does 500 things bad: "saar, that is because islamic and british invasion"
You can't talk to brainwashed people who believes that the Taj Mahal was not built in the 17th century but several centuries ago even though it is carbon dated to that time.
This caller is hilarious 😂 He shot himself in the foot when he said "hindutva bjp rss" has nothing to do with "true hindu rashtra based on hinduism". If that is true, why does he even refer to Pakistan as an "islamic state"? Hashim, don't waste your time with such amateurs.
Lolz😂😂😂 Only a matter of time before he brought up the "islamic invasion" . Mughal Hindustan was a powerhouse of the medieval era which laid the foundations for everything the modern Secular Republic then inherited. The pre-existing vedic hindu tribes (themselves a product of FOREIGN influence-but that is another story) hoarded the people's wealth in temples under the tyranny of the caste system. Vedic hindu tribal "India" would have gone the way of the Aztecs because of their simplistic, carnal and despotic form of governance.
As a Saudi, I’ve noticed that whenever I speak to an Indian worker, they often express negative opinions about Pakistan. May Allah bless Pakistan. They really protecting rest of Muslim world from this filth.
Thank you brother, as a Pakistani, I respect Saudi's, but there has been negativity from Saudi's towards Pakistani workers, only what ive heard over time, and I hope things have changed dramatically, as we have been facing prejudice for years now, and plenty of it from the west.
This Dalit guy is trying to be more Roman than the Romans themselves. Clear dehuminisation of his people throughout India and yet he defends those very people and their traditions which perpetuate this crime. What is he suffering from?? Somebody tell me....🎉
@@yusufwadkar6011 He's gonna say that all three of said countries are not Muslims, well if we're talking about SG then sure, but the Islamic influence are still there, in fact, if the Muslims didn't preach Islam in the Malay Archipelago, we'd be stuck with that stupid caste system.
Not only APJ Abdul Kalam..... In India gate hindu are 20000+ but Muslim are 60000+ more than 3 times are Muslim to fight and killed by British army ... Veer Abdul Hamid finishes the 7 pakistani tank ... Abid Hasan Safrani Abid Hasan Safrani, an Indian National Army (INA) soldier from Hyderabad is one of the unsung heroes of Hyderabad. He not only played role in India’s independence but also coined the slogan ‘Jai Hind’ which was later declared the salutation of the Indian Army and government employees.
He thinks muslims invade india first, but what about Iran, Greeks.. who ruled for 2 centuries 😂 .. guess white doesn't count. Who the hell set boundaries in the first place, when everyone was invading the other. He sounds perfectly egoistic of his mythical and self created past
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 no such thing as india back then. What I meant is people invading from these regions which are now called as Iran and Greece, were actually the first invasion on the land that is now called as india
4:23 this question caught the goof ..he tried to show Hindus are developing and Muslims are not because of it's religion.. INDIA'S mainly hindus does this they act superior by comparing other below countries those who don't have as much as opportunities compare as land wise , population wise etc 😂😂😂
I am Indian too. He is lying so much. First of all, the only fair comparison of India is with China because India has a much larger area of land, and a much larger population, both are neighboring countries, and India Hindu is more similar to the Chinese than the Pakistani Muslim culture. The only similarity between Pakistan and India is that not all but some Pakistanis like Sindhis, Punjabis, etc are ethnically the same as some north-western Indians. India has more people below the poverty line than Pakistan's total population. If he is comparing GDP with a much smaller country, it is obviously false. But if wants to compare per capita then he should also look at Bangladesh also Muslim country that was created much later than India and has better per capita income than India.
i am from KPK pakistan. the reason why pakistan is behind india interms of development is because of the 10 million afghan living here since 1979 causing instabillity
@@Rockyrock511 Don't blame afghans, infact they have contributed heavily in development of Pakistan. I will tell you although on paper Pakistan appear poor, but they are living in far better condition than indian. Pakistan had to live as a security state and spend heavily for its defence then due to security condition investment in industry nearly dried up. Well it is long debate and Pakistan problems are multidimensional.
@@snd9826 brother, you dont know. IN kpk Afghans started smuggling our goods to afghanistan in karachi the afghans formed colonies and didnt allow muhajirs to come in, resulting in civil unrestbetween the muhajirs and afgahans
@@Rockyrock511 it is very easy to blame some one else for our own short falls. What you think we Pakistani punjabis and all others are not involved in smuggling and every conceivable crime. Afghans could have done what you said but there share in all kinds of crimes is far less than what we assume. The fault is clearly of our own. We must not make any community a scapegoat for our wrong doing.
@@snd9826 i am not speaking into air, i am taing statistics and 00% factual arguments into account. compare the growth rate of pakistan before and after afghan refugees.
If religion is used as reason for Indian success than why is large numbers of Indians working in the Gulf nations and earning huge foreign exchange? Poverty index puts India below Pakistan and Bangladesh. So one can get to dark side of the moon while your people are starving. Get your priorities right.
Hindu Rastra means cast system: Bhramma, Khatria, Baisha, Sudra and Untouchables. Disgrace of humanity. It creates division among human being. A dog can drink water in a Bhramma house but a Sudra or Untouchable is not allowed to drink water in a Bhramma house. If a lower cast person touch any item of a Bhramma house that item become unholy. Higher cast are the master and lower cast are the slave like in Hindu religion. Lower cast only born to serve higher cast and in a real classical Hindu culture lower cast don't have any fundamental rights against the higher cast.
As a Pakistani, I would love a chance to explain to this lindu how Pakistan was backstabbed during its creation. The lindus kept our money. We weren't given our fair share of the partition. Nothing was shared equally or on the basis of 7030 as it was supposed to be. India still owes a couple of 100 million rupees to Pakistan from 1947. So this lindu coming here and seeing that Pakistan and India started at the same footing is completely wrong
lets not forget the millions of the Indians that are working in the gulf Muslim countries and sending remittance's back home to India to feed their families or trading to contribute to India's GDP.
Your right, this should have been put into this hindutva guys head, plus tye fact that India has more Muslims in India than overall in Pakistan, so hindu's haven't excelled India economically.
Ask him why Nepal which was a Hindu Monarchy until 2008 is still poorer than Bangladesh, Secular India and Pak. And did I mention they kicked out Buddhist monks from Nepal just for preaching Buddhism. So much for being a "tolerant" religion.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 The point here is that the clueless debater was trying to link India's prosperity to "Hindu culture and traditions" even though that really isn't the case since even former Hindu monarchies like Nepal are still poorer than Pak. Bangladesh, despite gaining independence much later than India and despite being formerly the poorest province of Pak, ended up having a higher Human Development Index ranking , Higher life expectancy, higher per capita income than India. So Display Name's claims are all bogus.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 India is neither Bangladesh's top import nor export partner. Keep coping. Did you even read my response ? Or do not understand English ?
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 There are atleast 14 countries that are landlocked like Nepal and are far richer and more developed than India. Your point is moot.
The guy talks about Islamic invasions setting india back. What nonsense. The guy doesnt realise that if Muslims didn't rule and hence unite it as a single nation, the hindu kings of each part of india would still be fighting among themselves to this day.
@@ARVINDYADAV-es6qk This is the problem with most indians: Still stuck in ancient history hangover. Come back to the present. Moreover according to several accounts from some historians, many large parts of india were not part of Maurya empire and were controlled by independent autonomous tribes. Anyways, we are talking about present day india. The present day india wouldn't be an integrated nation as it is today if Mughals didn't rule india.
India is becoming economic superpower not because of hinduism. Its because it has historically tried tondistance itself from hinduism. Lets get into the examples, 1850s and 60s sati pratha was abolished, it was a strike against hinduism. Then the initiation of widow marriage, abrogation of child marriage and polygamy all were attacks on hinduism. Studying western philosophy, science etc were also seen as a blow on the local vedic and brahminic tradition. And when the constitution was made, it was madenas such no human on the basis of gender, community, cast will be favoured or declined. These fundamental change in the society gave india the needed unity under diversity to grow, everyone here thought india as their own. This sense of ferternity, belongings etc were key, not hinduism. All govt institutes in india follows these secular, liberal philosophy. So ya, india has not become successful because of hinduism, NOT AT ALL. But sadly, its going backwards now a days.
And the comparison with pakistan or bangladesh is i will say ignorant.When country got independence, it was hell lot poor. Now if you want to become rich, u need business and industries. And this needs manpower, stable govt, raw materials etc. The main mineral rich parts of the subcontinent felt in india. The chotanagpur plateau, the deccan plateau... And the food bowls like ganges, brahmaputra plain basin.. so bangladesh isnt rich in minerals, although its rich in ploughable land. And pakistan also doesnt hv rice minerals, just some ploughable lands in the middle in sindh-sagar doab and the two sides of river indus. So there are lot of factors. And making it seems like religion did this, is pure nonsence
No you are wrong King Ashoka was the first to unite entire India including Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran under his command, but even under Ashoka period he couldn't invade the Tamil lands in South India which was ruled by cholas, pandyas and cheras , so it was Ashoka first not the Mughals,
The first education minister was a muslim.. There were loads of Muslim who were freedom fighters along with others who sacrificed their life. So if he is talking about the starting point he needs to be reminded how did we arrive at the starting point in the first place.
India only started doing well in the 90s with economic liberalisation. Pakistan has been under military rule and elite (feudal system) for most of part of its independent existence. It has hardly anything to do with the religion of their population.
The globalization which started in 80's and liberalisation policy in 90's laid the foundation for a huge economic growth in india. One other key factor which benefited India was the English speaking population unlike China, grabbed most of the IT outsourcing. So though the British looted us, they left us with good language skills But there are a few good points by the tamil guy which Muslims should introspect and balance religion with development
@@khozabenhamid9745 Indian textbooks clearly has all invasions of India. The people who talk about Only Mughal invasion, haven't read any of history even on surface level
The first law passed by Babur was to make wearing clothes mandatory. Imagine, other than 5% of people (who were the rulers), were not allowed to even wear clothes! You can deny all you want that India achieved its golden era under the Mughals, nothing will change except it displays your hypocrisy.
@@chillbreeze9970yes, I have. I was a history student who did research on various kingdoms in India and wrote papers. I spoke with that knowledge. I don’t mean to offend anyone or put anyone down. Don’t believe me? No problem. There are number of Hindu writers who wrote books, good writers and researchers. Please read them. What happened in history has nothing to do with today, it doesn’t make you any big or small. Take it easy.
Pakistan is a new country, not India... Bc Pakistan comes out of India... India is one of the oldest country and Moreover India didn't start came into existence in 1947.... the development we are seeing in India are because of British and their infrastructures
Bro india never United it had divided in many kingdom not a single empire which conclude all part of india unite which is today ,,, every empire had left some land like mughal didn't conquer some part south india,,maurya empire didn't conquer northeast India 😅so india is actually a new United country if we talk about history
Bangladesh is doing phenomenally well in terms of literacy and education. Its doing better than india I would say. India is doing well but its still a mess and has huge poverty and a high illiteracy rate among the population.
Too many false comparisons. 1. India is 4 to 5 times larger than Pakistan 2. Most of the industrial, commercial sectors that were built during Mughals and British Raj were mostly in India giving their economy a boost 3. Political stability after independence were markedly different not due to religion or culture but rather the societal make up and chain of events. To name the few
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 If a country is bigger in size it gets more natural resources to boost the economy and that is the biggest factor here other two points are insignificant, there was no india as it now at that time because pak and ind were together so u can't taken from India, There are other religions in Pakistan as well. And the reason for Pakistans downfall is because ot it's corrupt politicians it has nothing to with religion.
If you have Hindu Rashtra based on Hindu scriptures then casteism should come back again as it is an integral part of Hindi scriptures. A good example is the treatment of Karan met by Hindu gods cos he was supposed to be a lower caste. There are several such examples in Hindu scriptures
First he says india after 1947, the moment hashim points out on hunger index, he talks about invasions before 1947. He don't want to give this benefit of doubt to Pakistan or Bangladesh. Purr hypocrisy. 😏
India is still a poor country. 1.4 billion people collectively make the india 3rd largest. But average income of common people of india is very low. Per capita GDP of Bangladesh is higher than India.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 2023 and previously was higher for Bangladesh. But it's very close to each other like this year and the previous years too
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688Bangladesh got independence much later than India, yet there's just 80 dollar difference in per capita income and it has higher hdi and life expectancy than India.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 Keep giving excuses. India has more resources, larger population, got independence much earlier, larger labour force etc etc, still it got outcompeted by smaller countries like Bangladesh and Vietnam.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 So why much larger countries like China is richer than India despite current govt getting established 3 years after India's did ? Keep giving excuses for your incompetence.
Highly advanced country is 110 on hunger index and both its 'less advanced' neigjbours are doing better in this context. So no, thanks we are happy the way we are🤣🤣
India, Nepal, and Mauritius, the only 3 hindu majority states in the world. In terms of GDP per capita, Nepal is at no.151, India at no.130 and Mauritius at no.72. Bangladesh GDP is higher than India, at no.127 in the world. India's population is the highest in the world currently, but with a 130th position is truly embarrassing, showing extreme unproductivity or a critical failure in their system so idk why this bloke goes around yapping garbage
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 2024 is still ongoing, my dear indian enthusiast and when we do data comparison, we compare complete data. i'm from neither of those countries but my country is ranked in the top 5 but still, we feel grateful and help those who are in need while ya'll start yapping and start calling overseas hotlines boasting about your tiny GDP per capita, when the top 10 in the world are all about 50-60 times bigger than yours. and all this with an ongoing 2024 data. indians are just so proud of nothing.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 it's not IMF's fault but your own, for not knowing how to do basic comparison correctly. you seem to have a habit of pushing the blame of your own ignorance to others, which i suggest you drop it for your own growth. Bangladesh has had higher (Nominal & PPP) GDP per capita in 2023 and (Nominal) GDP per capita 2022 than in india, both years proving basically they could walk into your country and live a more comfortable life than an average indian but i didn't see no Bangladeshi boasting and jeering india the way your people do? and why not compare yourself to Singapore then, a country that gained independence in the 1965, and see where it stands now.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 Can you explain why Bangladesh's life expectancy is higher than India's and also has higher HDI despite gaining independence several decades later ?
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 Bangladesh is not a "small" country , it's population is bigger than Russia ! The fact you cannot explain why Bangladesh is more developed than India shows how clueless you are. In that case why bigger countries like China is more developed than India despite getting independence later ? Keep coping.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688Yeah india is doing so good economically that's why most of you live in UAE, Malaysia, Indonesia and europe. Even your multi millionaires and billionaires don't want to live in india I wonder why😂? Also don't you guys claim you are the most ancient nation on earth? So that means you had plenty of time to develope then shouldn't you at least be 3rd or 2nd place worldwide in every category?
What nonesense! He started saying they developed by hinduism but later couldnt say one law that helped in developement. He was talking about cultures and traditions!!
Pakistan was not given 40 crores which was promised as a part of partition. The same reason why Godsey killed Gandhi. The same leading Pakistan to go to IMF which turned into a rabbit hole and rest is history
All India monuments which India earn all are given by Muslims and Mughals ... Division of India and Pakistan is not justice because India capture 29 state and give Pakistan only two or three state... All all earning places are captured by India ... This is the reason India is more developed then Pakistan 😊
In Gujrat some years before there was report dalits were beaten publicly. The allegations. Was that they ate cows.. It was reported and there was videos too.
What an irony the ones who have suffered insults and discrimination for thousands of years from upper caste are defending the religion,in fact should be grateful for reservation and not religion.
This guy is denying the discrimination against Dalits in India. Is he really from India or trying to cover up an open fact. Dalits are converting to other religions. Is there any limit to this guy’s ignorance? May be, this guy is just trying to polish his English language skills here. Are other people not surprised from this guy’s Hindu mentality? I’m not surprised at all.
We should send him to pakistan . Such naive ideology of hindutwa brother a limited capacity to compare neighbour country , way why not compare with japan,china malaysia and so on.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688Pakistan is also much cleaner then India. This is a fact. I've been to both and despite pakistan's issue's it's also safer [less r-cases].
These Hindu nationalist have an issue to distinguish Sanatan dharma from culture, traditions when on the first hand they claim everything to be hindu. See there's a contradiction when you have seperated an identity of religion or Sanatan dharma from your culture or traditions, then what that means is you can't claim anything under identity of hindu and every region, land in geography is indipendent from the claims of sanatan dharma. So ultimately you can only talking about a certain king or emperor not Bharat as a nation because you can't claim it's diversity under any umbrella other than sanatan dharma.
We all have seen India land on the moon using a 1977 space invader game. Imagine in thse day's of digital cameras they couldn't shoot a decent footage of the moon landing.
Iam an muslim Indian. But let me tell that landing a rover on moon doesnt define success. Sure its for research purposes, but no need to brag about it. Its just childish. Especially when mocking other countries. And comming to your comment, in space normal electronics doesnt work. So they use different electronics which are costly. And ISRO is not as rich as NASA, even their employees doesnt even earn much, R&D development budget is low. so yeah it looked in poor quality.
so where did the 45 trillion that british took come from? and prior to that Mughal ruled India for roughly 300 years. So is it wrong to say Mughals were partly if not majorly responsible for the riches in India.
Do he still make the argument fair Meta AI discovers the fact ,I asked Meta AI which revealed that before invasion also india became poor. [13/09, 15:35] Alfaan: Does india had poor people before muslim invasion(or) British invasion? I think india has ? Right or wrong ? [13/09, 15:35] Meta AI: India had poor people before Muslim and British invasions. _Poverty in Ancient and Medieval India:_ 1. Vedic Period (1500 BCE - 500 BCE): Social hierarchy, with Vaishyas (traders) and Shudras (labourers) facing economic challenges. 2. Mauryan Empire (322 BCE - 185 BCE): Economic inequality, with a small elite controlling resources. 3. Gupta Empire (320 CE - 550 CE): Social and economic disparities persisted. _Causes of Poverty:_ 1. Caste system 2. Limited economic opportunities 3. Social inequality 4. Regional disparities 5. Natural disasters and famines _Muslim Invasion (11th-12th century):_ 1. Disrupted trade and economy 2. Destruction of temples, universities, and libraries 3. Imposition of Islamic rule, leading to cultural and social changes _British Invasion (18th-19th century):_ 1. Exploitation of resources 2. Destruction of indigenous industries (textiles, iron) 3. Imposition of British education and culture 4. Economic drain (transfer of wealth to Britain) _Poverty Rates (Pre-British Era):_ Estimates vary, but: 1. Ancient India: 10-20% of population lived in poverty 2. Medieval India: 20-30% of population lived in poverty _Post-Independence Poverty Rates:_ 1. 1950s: 50-60% of population lived in poverty 2. 1970s: 40-50% of population lived in poverty 3. 1990s: 30-40% of population lived in poverty _Recent Trends:_ 1. Poverty rates declined from 35.7% (2004-05) to 21.2% (2011-12) 2. 2020 estimates: 35.7% of population lives in poverty India's poverty history is complex, with various factors contributing to economic disparities.
This is funny In one single breath he said Mughal invasion bankrupted the India and next comes British who stole 45 trillion pounds so where did this 45 trillion come from in Mughal period?
"Mr Display Name" displays shamelessly, in public, more ignorance and confusion than knowledge and understanding. 1- There is a failure to recognize the existing divide between India and neighbouring countries even by the usual measures of GDP per capita expressed in current international dollars corrected by purchasing power parity (PPP). Data from the World Bank indicate that though India's figures are higher than Bangladesh's and Pakistan's, they were lagging behind the latter until 2008. Part of the blame for the failure of economic policies in these countries should be laid at the door of politicians and may be largely explained by the repetitive coups d'etat and political instability. Nothing to do with Islamic theology or Islamic economics. 2- Surprisingly, the sense of over-triumphalism toward Bangladesh and Pakistan displayed by Mr "Display Name" does not extend to other neighbours. Bhutan and Sri Lanka have persistently higher GDP per capita than India. Does the evidence mean that their versions of Hinduism is superior to India's? Also, perhaps the reason for avoiding any comparison with China lies in the fact that the latter's GDP per capita figures are more than double India's. Again, does the evidence mean that China's version of Buddhism is superior to India's? No to mention the immense gap even with Middle-Income countries. So the question to Mr "Display Name" is: what Hindu teachings can explain India's economic success compared to Bangladesh and Pakistan, and failure compared to China and other countries with majority Hindu populations. 3- Seemingly, Mr "Display Name" has no answers to complex questions related to human, economic, and social development, which require a basic level of critical thinking. Alas, logical thinking seems to be suppressed, in the case of Mr "Display Name" by deep Islamophobia, and inhibited by sheer arrogance. Fast speech does not win arguments, and no amount of data analysis can help bridge these clear cognitive problems. A display of good knowledge, humility, and sincerity may.
@alimelmalak7907 I ❤how you refer to that delusional individual as mr. Display name as we can see in the screen😂. The reason he can't show his face is most likely cause he has some suspicious "business" from some shady mall or appartmentcomplex. Where he and his "co workers" aka fellow [scammers] "work" their way into some old [whyte] lady's bankaccount overseas. Pretending to work for a pay-pal centre😂. They have to keep their identity a secret otherwise their only "source" of income is out the window LOL.
alimelmalak7907 I ❤how you refer to that delusional individual as mr. Display name as we can see in the screen😂. The reason he can't show his face is most likely cause he has some suspicious "business" from some shady mall or appartmentcomplex. Where he and his "co workers" aka fellow [scammers] "work" their way into some old [whyte] lady's bankaccount overseas. Pretending to work for a pay-pal centre😂. They have to keep their identity a secret otherwise their only "source" of income is out the window LOL.
What amazes me is that when most Indian non-Muslims pride themselves on their country's success in landing on the moon. Yes! It is a scientific achievement to be proud of. But, isn't it also a contradiction that a large population lives in poverty and the cities lack basic Toilet amenities? I am not a biased person who favors Indians or Pakistanis because I am not Indian or Pakistani and respect both, but I visited both countries and found that Pakistani cities are more developed and clean with fewer beggars on the roads. Nations build modern cities and good economies and eradicate poverty before spending billions of $$$ flying to outer space.
Modern China started its journey on Oct 1st 1949 which Tamilian do not wants to compare with. China has contributed almost three-quarters of the global reduction in the number of people living in extreme poverty over the past 40 years.
One pattern I noticed with Hindu arguemnets is that, when you show a contradiction in their vedas, they will say we took it out of context. And when you prove that you didn't take it out of context, then they claim that the problem is with our misinterpretation. And if you somehow prove it's not a misinterpretation issue, they will tell you it takes years of practice and education to decode the vedas. I notice the same pattern with almost all of their arguments. They will kick the ball around and always try to blame something or somebody else. But they will never accept the fact that everything in their religion is messed up or the fact that this country is only going down. Have you noticed how he went silent when you mentioned the fluid nature of dharma. Like they don't know what their dharma even is. I mean, would you say Hitler did his dharma well? There's almost no distinction between the concept of evil and good. You can see this if you read Mahabharatha.
RUclips Shadow Banning again Please share, like and comment to break the Algorithm
Tell us, where you’re watching from?
Brothers and Sisters! Please Like, Comment and Share the video to help us reach more people so you can share in the reward in sha Allah!
*SUPPORT DAWAHWISE*
❤www.patreon.com/dawahwise
❤gofund.me/dba0c96f
❤www.paypal.me/dawahwise
❤Join DawahWise Membership:
ruclips.net/user/DawahWisejoin
Assalaam alaikum. I think there is an algorithm switch somewhere between 200k and 300k. May not be a shadow ban.
@@DawahWise New York City. The disbelief will not stop pestering true Faith thinking it can sway it to consider disbelief and accept it as something noble. Nay!
Pakistan finds the 4th largest oil reserve in the world 😅😅😅
Things are going to change soon inshaAllah
I am an Indian Tamil Muslim
Watching from Paris, France
Stopped watching video when the guy with hat and glasses said that countries tolerance and growth is because of secularism. Not really true. Infact he's wrong. Hinduism has pretty good proven tolerance to multitude of beliefs and ideas, compared to Islam and christianity which only accepts one belief. It is the culture and not the constitution itself. It is the poor choice of government policy that China is economically more developed than India.
Turkey also is secular, but are there any significant visible minorities and their beliefs there except christianity. The answer is NO.
India is one of the largest exporters of beef in the world
Hindu owners with Muslim company names like al kabeer 😂
I really enjoy watching two grown adults argue about whose imaginary friend is better than the others.😂
imaginery for you, not for others @@itachiofthesharingan67
The beef they export is buffalo meat not cow and those businesses do have Muslim co owners
@@eggytoasthe is saying they named their company after muslim names.
@@eggytoast The Muslim countries don't import Buffalo meat, check it at your end. You lost this so badly.
I'm an Indian-Tamilian too as he is. This guy speak out of pure ignorance. Even if the growth/development of India is coming out of culture/tradition as he claimed, yet it's nothing to do with Hinduism/ Islam/Christianity or any other religion. All the people irrespective of their faith are contributing to the nation's development. The hindutva is spreading a false information which is believed by most Hindus that the country was thriving before Mughal/British invasions, which was actually not. There were very negligible percentage of people who are kings or some wealthy landlords who were rich and thriving. The majority was struggling for food and suffering poverty. Same as now, the development they claim is just a very minor percentage of people businesses men/ IT professionals/ etc.. are having enough wealth, the majority are suffering even for the three times food. Only a few states of India are performing good in nation's development, the reat majority states are struggling.
Unemployment rate is skyrocketing in the country.
They are just simply obsessed with Pakistan, that's it. Pakistan is anything and everything for them. They don't think beyond that. All they see is, we are not in as bad situation as Pakistan, then they feel content.
Hi. I don't disagree with your summary bro, but I want to know what happened to India, because 20 to 25+ years ago this obsession about Pakistan didn't exist. What changed ?
U summarize a long fact in a very brief way.. MashaAllah I m 100 percent agree with ur each and every word..they r highly obsessed with Pakistan..they don't think beyond this.
@@SlimDonni You disagree? Very simple, pull out your summary why you disagree about it which you wont do anyway, so why waste time here?
@@SlimDonni Answer in one sentence is "BJP wants power + RSS wants to eliminate Muslims" for this both to happen, this collab took a tool "Pakistan". And the followers of both are executing the orders.
I can also see the unhealthy obsession of Pakistan by Indians, rarely so from Pakistanis.
I want ask this Hindu brother one question, Nepal got freedom 1923 and it is a Hindu or a Hindu Majority Country. Why Nepal is so poor? If Hinduism is the factor for India's growth WHY HINDUISM can't play a role Nepal's economic growth or any sort of development? And Bangladesh is ahead of Nepal getting independence in 1923 when Bangladesh in 1971. I wonder if his hate towards Islam has allowed him to looked at the bigger picture. This guy conveniently just ignored China when they got their independence in 1949 but it wont fit his narrative. And how in the world I do not see anyone talking about how British stole from India over $45 Trillions, they were Christians but again not fitting his narrative so just ignore it and blame it on the Mugals. As a matter of fact in Hindu scripter Mugal King were being called Bhramhin Brothers.
And adding up to who did harm India? No one has hurt India and Indian society more than Hindu Bhrambhins. If a society preaching follows
Gautama Dharmasūtra (12:4-6 according to one numbering, 2:3:4 according to another) to this effect:
“4 And if he listens in on a vedic recitation, his ears shall be filled with molten tin or lac; 5 if he repeats it, his tongue shall be cut off; 6 if he commits it to memory, his body shall be split asunder.” (Translation Patrick Olivelle, Dharmasūtras: The law codes of ancient India, OUP, 1999, p.98)
I can go on and on and on how Bramhans being a tiney tiny part of the population oppressed Sudras over thousands of years and it's all over Hindu scripters. He is so dishonest he blame Muslims and Islam. I can clearly see, he is trying so hard to be J Sai Deepak another Hindu extremist and propagandist.
And to conclude, Pakistan's fall not because of Islam: it is rather falling apart from Islamic values and culture as a whole.
Great brother
Well Said!!
Because Pakistan abandoned Allah's Sharia that's Y the fall
This amount was calculated in in previous decade. I recalculated the amount and adjusted it for inflation it amounted to $ 65 trillion.
Similar thing for Malaysia 1957. Lets compare their growth with india.
India is not a single nation. It is an aggregation of multiple nation states that were forced together by the Christian British, an enforced aggregation perpetuated by hindutva nationalism.
And it does NOT only consist of Hindus, Muslims played a huge part in both the past and present right now
From London originally but now in 🇶🇦 Qatar ❤
The sheer irony of the colonised being instilled with the mindset of the colonisers
Yeah and tbh the most developed part of India is the southern region who do not consider religion as a priority... Tamil Nadu for example has an atheist party that has dominated the politics of TN for the past 60 years.....
Britain belongs to Celtics hindus
blinded by hatred
and drunkeness too
GDP per capita of Bangladesh is more than India
Bro u sure🙂
Per capita 2023 bangladesh is higher
@ibtedaa2 of course it is
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 yeah that's right
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688
Three poor people arguing who is more poor in 2024 ...
Time can change easily
India does 2-3 things good: "saar, that is because we are Hindu nation"
India does 500 things bad: "saar, that is because islamic and british invasion"
Lmfao They masters at picking and choosing their narratives.
So freaking true
You can't talk to brainwashed people who believes that the Taj Mahal was not built in the 17th century but several centuries ago even though it is carbon dated to that time.
😂😂😂
LoL, So trueee😂
This caller is hilarious 😂
He shot himself in the foot when he said "hindutva bjp rss" has nothing to do with "true hindu rashtra based on hinduism". If that is true, why does he even refer to Pakistan as an "islamic state"?
Hashim, don't waste your time with such amateurs.
Not wasting time. It is to expose them
Narrow minded
Lolz😂😂😂
Only a matter of time before he brought up the "islamic invasion" .
Mughal Hindustan was a powerhouse of the medieval era which laid the foundations for everything the modern Secular Republic then inherited. The pre-existing vedic hindu tribes (themselves a product of FOREIGN influence-but that is another story) hoarded the people's wealth in temples under the tyranny of the caste system. Vedic hindu tribal "India" would have gone the way of the Aztecs because of their simplistic, carnal and despotic form of governance.
Ignorant is a choice, but certain people are born with it........
Dont say that, ut goes against Islam
I am a Tamil Muslim ❤
Mashallah, I'm from Bangalore
Alhamdulillah
Why is this guy so obsessed with Pakistan ?
Thats how the BJP keeps Indians away from thinking.
He is an agent
As a Saudi, I’ve noticed that whenever I speak to an Indian worker, they often express negative opinions about Pakistan. May Allah bless Pakistan. They really protecting rest of Muslim world from this filth.
Thank you brother, as a Pakistani, I respect Saudi's, but there has been negativity from Saudi's towards Pakistani workers, only what ive heard over time, and I hope things have changed dramatically, as we have been facing prejudice for years now, and plenty of it from the west.
Because it's a muslim majority country
This Dalit guy is trying to be more Roman than the Romans themselves. Clear dehuminisation of his people throughout India and yet he defends those very people and their traditions which perpetuate this crime. What is he suffering from?? Somebody tell me....🎉
How did you know that he is a dalit?
@@PrasadVarshanMusic He claims to be one in the video.
Man focused on Only Pakistan Bangladesh and left out Indonesia Malaysia Singapore 😂
@@yusufwadkar6011 He's gonna say that all three of said countries are not Muslims, well if we're talking about SG then sure, but the Islamic influence are still there, in fact, if the Muslims didn't preach Islam in the Malay Archipelago, we'd be stuck with that stupid caste system.
The Father of all scientists in India is APJ Abdul Kalam
A hidden Hindu with Muslim name.
I must say Hindus are more into education than Muslims.
Abdul Kalam is not a muslim
He loved Hinduism tho
@@namah4399but you hate him that,s why you called Muslims abduls😂😂
@@Omegacrafton what when did I call them abduls ?
@@namah4399 I am not talking about you I am talking about majority hindoos , almost 99 percent
I m watching from India.... I want to tell him display man even muslim made major contribution ... APJ Abdul kalam ...
Not only APJ Abdul Kalam.....
In India gate hindu are 20000+ but Muslim are 60000+ more than 3 times are Muslim to fight and killed by British army ...
Veer Abdul Hamid finishes the 7 pakistani tank ...
Abid Hasan Safrani
Abid Hasan Safrani, an Indian National Army (INA) soldier from Hyderabad is one of the unsung heroes of Hyderabad. He not only played role in India’s independence but also coined the slogan ‘Jai Hind’ which was later declared the salutation of the Indian Army and government employees.
Tamilian lolll
Ask him why haven't they developed bathrooms and toilets?
Why is soap water and deodrant a kryptonite to them?
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688Excellent. Now go ask the politicians to flush the bigotry out of their bodies, and don't forget to wash your hands
@@SyiepherzeU nailed it
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688average Lindu brain
He thinks muslims invade india first, but what about Iran, Greeks.. who ruled for 2 centuries 😂 .. guess white doesn't count.
Who the hell set boundaries in the first place, when everyone was invading the other.
He sounds perfectly egoistic of his mythical and self created past
He fell asleep then
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 no such thing as india back then.
What I meant is people invading from these regions which are now called as Iran and Greece, were actually the first invasion on the land that is now called as india
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688Fine, Persians and Ancient Greeks. Satisfied?
When did the ancient greeks invade india lol maybe north india.
@@2sangillis umm.. they controlled North for whole lot of 2 centuries...
Come on guys let us eat Beef...
Allahu Akbar Allah is the greatest ⏲️
4:23 this question caught the goof ..he tried to show Hindus are developing and Muslims are not because of it's religion.. INDIA'S mainly hindus does this they act superior by comparing other below countries those who don't have as much as opportunities compare as land wise , population wise etc 😂😂😂
I am Indian too. He is lying so much. First of all, the only fair comparison of India is with China because India has a much larger area of land, and a much larger population, both are neighboring countries, and India Hindu is more similar to the Chinese than the Pakistani Muslim culture. The only similarity between Pakistan and India is that not all but some Pakistanis like Sindhis, Punjabis, etc are ethnically the same as some north-western Indians. India has more people below the poverty line than Pakistan's total population. If he is comparing GDP with a much smaller country, it is obviously false. But if wants to compare per capita then he should also look at Bangladesh also Muslim country that was created much later than India and has better per capita income than India.
i am from KPK pakistan. the reason why pakistan is behind india interms of development is because of the 10 million afghan living here since 1979 causing instabillity
@@Rockyrock511 Don't blame afghans, infact they have contributed heavily in development of Pakistan. I will tell you although on paper Pakistan appear poor, but they are living in far better condition than indian. Pakistan had to live as a security state and spend heavily for its defence then due to security condition investment in industry nearly dried up. Well it is long debate and Pakistan problems are multidimensional.
@@snd9826 brother, you dont know. IN kpk Afghans started smuggling our goods to afghanistan in karachi the afghans formed colonies and didnt allow muhajirs to come in, resulting in civil unrestbetween the muhajirs and afgahans
@@Rockyrock511 it is very easy to blame some one else for our own short falls. What you think we Pakistani punjabis and all others are not involved in smuggling and every conceivable crime. Afghans could have done what you said but there share in all kinds of crimes is far less than what we assume. The fault is clearly of our own. We must not make any community a scapegoat for our wrong doing.
@@snd9826 i am not speaking into air, i am taing statistics and 00% factual arguments into account. compare the growth rate of pakistan before and after afghan refugees.
If religion is used as reason for Indian success than why is large numbers of Indians working in the Gulf nations and earning huge foreign exchange?
Poverty index puts India below Pakistan and Bangladesh.
So one can get to dark side of the moon while your people are starving. Get your priorities right.
Hindu Rastra means cast system: Bhramma, Khatria, Baisha, Sudra and Untouchables. Disgrace of humanity. It creates division among human being. A dog can drink water in a Bhramma house but a Sudra or Untouchable is not allowed to drink water in a Bhramma house. If a lower cast person touch any item of a Bhramma house that item become unholy. Higher cast are the master and lower cast are the slave like in Hindu religion. Lower cast only born to serve higher cast and in a real classical Hindu culture lower cast don't have any fundamental rights against the higher cast.
As a Pakistani, I would love a chance to explain to this lindu how Pakistan was backstabbed during its creation. The lindus kept our money. We weren't given our fair share of the partition. Nothing was shared equally or on the basis of 7030 as it was supposed to be. India still owes a couple of 100 million rupees to Pakistan from 1947. So this lindu coming here and seeing that Pakistan and India started at the same footing is completely wrong
lets not forget the millions of the Indians that are working in the gulf Muslim countries and sending remittance's back home to India to feed their families or trading to contribute to India's GDP.
Real.
Your right, this should have been put into this hindutva guys head, plus tye fact that India has more Muslims in India than overall in Pakistan, so hindu's haven't excelled India economically.
Ask him why Nepal which was a Hindu Monarchy until 2008 is still poorer than Bangladesh, Secular India and Pak. And did I mention they kicked out Buddhist monks from Nepal just for preaching Buddhism. So much for being a "tolerant" religion.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 The point here is that the clueless debater was trying to link India's prosperity to "Hindu culture and traditions" even though that really isn't the case since even former Hindu monarchies like Nepal are still poorer than Pak. Bangladesh, despite gaining independence much later than India and despite being formerly the poorest province of Pak, ended up having a higher Human Development Index ranking , Higher life expectancy, higher per capita income than India. So Display Name's claims are all bogus.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 India is neither Bangladesh's top import nor export partner. Keep coping. Did you even read my response ? Or do not understand English ?
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 There are atleast 14 countries that are landlocked like Nepal and are far richer and more developed than India. Your point is moot.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 Lol complete lie
The guy talks about Islamic invasions setting india back. What nonsense. The guy doesnt realise that if Muslims didn't rule and hence unite it as a single nation, the hindu kings of each part of india would still be fighting among themselves to this day.
Maurya Empire
@@ARVINDYADAV-es6qk This is the problem with most indians: Still stuck in ancient history hangover. Come back to the present.
Moreover according to several accounts from some historians, many large parts of india were not part of Maurya empire and were controlled by independent autonomous tribes. Anyways, we are talking about present day india. The present day india wouldn't be an integrated nation as it is today if Mughals didn't rule india.
India Scared of China 😂😂😂😂
India is becoming economic superpower not because of hinduism. Its because it has historically tried tondistance itself from hinduism. Lets get into the examples, 1850s and 60s sati pratha was abolished, it was a strike against hinduism. Then the initiation of widow marriage, abrogation of child marriage and polygamy all were attacks on hinduism. Studying western philosophy, science etc were also seen as a blow on the local vedic and brahminic tradition. And when the constitution was made, it was madenas such no human on the basis of gender, community, cast will be favoured or declined. These fundamental change in the society gave india the needed unity under diversity to grow, everyone here thought india as their own. This sense of ferternity, belongings etc were key, not hinduism. All govt institutes in india follows these secular, liberal philosophy. So ya, india has not become successful because of hinduism, NOT AT ALL.
But sadly, its going backwards now a days.
And the comparison with pakistan or bangladesh is i will say ignorant.When country got independence, it was hell lot poor. Now if you want to become rich, u need business and industries. And this needs manpower, stable govt, raw materials etc. The main mineral rich parts of the subcontinent felt in india. The chotanagpur plateau, the deccan plateau... And the food bowls like ganges, brahmaputra plain basin.. so bangladesh isnt rich in minerals, although its rich in ploughable land. And pakistan also doesnt hv rice minerals, just some ploughable lands in the middle in sindh-sagar doab and the two sides of river indus. So there are lot of factors. And making it seems like religion did this, is pure nonsence
Before the Sultans and Mughals , There is No India... They came and United all these States to One India.. 😂
No you are wrong King Ashoka was the first to unite entire India including Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran under his command, but even under Ashoka period he couldn't invade the Tamil lands in South India which was ruled by cholas, pandyas and cheras , so it was Ashoka first not the Mughals,
@Kuffarkiller no he was a Hindu, only after Kalinga War Ashoka converted to Buddhism, he was an expansionist before that also
@@PrasadVarshanMusic Mythology 😜
The first education minister was a muslim..
There were loads of Muslim who were freedom fighters along with others who sacrificed their life.
So if he is talking about the starting point he needs to be reminded how did we arrive at the starting point in the first place.
India only started doing well in the 90s with economic liberalisation.
Pakistan has been under military rule and elite (feudal system) for most of part of its independent existence.
It has hardly anything to do with the religion of their population.
And under corrupt leaders that have been charged with money laundering
The globalization which started in 80's and liberalisation policy in 90's laid the foundation for a huge economic growth in india. One other key factor which benefited India was the English speaking population unlike China, grabbed most of the IT outsourcing. So though the British looted us, they left us with good language skills
But there are a few good points by the tamil guy which Muslims should introspect and balance religion with development
This kid should learn world history,not based on India textbook.. almost no British colonization we're mention by him.. hypocrite+double standard
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 because British suck the resources within colonization..not Islam.. yet,you blamed the muslim on others fault
@@khozabenhamid9745 Indian textbooks clearly has all invasions of India. The people who talk about Only Mughal invasion, haven't read any of history even on surface level
@@SherlockH0lmes majority about Islam invasion.. colonization by English,we're kept hidden like it never happend..correct???
The first law passed by Babur was to make wearing clothes mandatory.
Imagine, other than 5% of people (who were the rulers), were not allowed to even wear clothes!
You can deny all you want that India achieved its golden era under the Mughals, nothing will change except it displays your hypocrisy.
You have never heard of the Mauryan Empire, Gupta Empire, chalukya Empire, cholas, vijaynagar Empire, Nanda Empire, pallava dynasty etc
@@chillbreeze9970Which has no impact whatsoever on the Indian people if they had to pass a law for wearing clothes
@@nutzhazel who were restricted on wearing the clothes and who did it
@@chillbreeze9970yes, I have.
I was a history student who did research on various kingdoms in India and wrote papers.
I spoke with that knowledge. I don’t mean to offend anyone or put anyone down.
Don’t believe me? No problem.
There are number of Hindu writers who wrote books, good writers and researchers.
Please read them.
What happened in history has nothing to do with today, it doesn’t make you any big or small.
Take it easy.
Let's not forget the breast tax.
Pakistan is a new country, not India... Bc Pakistan comes out of India... India is one of the oldest country and Moreover India didn't start came into existence in 1947.... the development we are seeing in India are because of British and their infrastructures
Bro don't abuse, all the cultures and civilization came thru sindh, Punjab, pakhtun region. So don't abuse
Bro india never United it had divided in many kingdom not a single empire which conclude all part of india unite which is today ,,, every empire had left some land like mughal didn't conquer some part south india,,maurya empire didn't conquer northeast India
😅so india is actually a new United country if we talk about history
@@BHOGVILAS279He is not abusing bro... He wrote bc as the short form of "because"😅
Not that what you are thinking
Bangladesh is doing phenomenally well in terms of literacy and education. Its doing better than india I would say. India is doing well but its still a mess and has huge poverty and a high illiteracy rate among the population.
And gdp per capita was higher in 2023 and previous years
On per capita scale :- Bangladesh is better
On national scale :- India is way ahead
Too many false comparisons.
1. India is 4 to 5 times larger than Pakistan
2. Most of the industrial, commercial sectors that were built during Mughals and British Raj were mostly in India giving their economy a boost
3. Political stability after independence were markedly different not due to religion or culture but rather the societal make up and chain of events.
To name the few
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 If a country is bigger in size it gets more natural resources to boost the economy and that is the biggest factor here other two points are insignificant, there was no india as it now at that time because pak and ind were together so u can't taken from India, There are other religions in Pakistan as well. And the reason for Pakistans downfall is because ot it's corrupt politicians it has nothing to with religion.
Wonderful reply Hashim....compare to the other neighbouring countries eg china
Please pray for the well-being of Indian Muslims.
Thanks brother!! 💚💚 Allahu Akbar ☝☝(From India 🇮🇳💚)
Answering without fact evidence and proof. Just his ignorant opinion.
If you have Hindu Rashtra based on Hindu scriptures then casteism should come back again as it is an integral part of Hindi scriptures. A good example is the treatment of Karan met by Hindu gods cos he was supposed to be a lower caste. There are several such examples in Hindu scriptures
Bro not a Tamilan, he is a Sanghi !
First he says india after 1947, the moment hashim points out on hunger index, he talks about invasions before 1947. He don't want to give this benefit of doubt to Pakistan or Bangladesh. Purr hypocrisy. 😏
Hashim crushed this guy when he noted the religion is capitalism and not based on any Hindu acetic principles
India is still a poor country. 1.4 billion people collectively make the india 3rd largest. But average income of common people of india is very low.
Per capita GDP of Bangladesh is higher than India.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 2023 and previously was higher for Bangladesh. But it's very close to each other like this year and the previous years too
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688Bangladesh got independence much later than India, yet there's just 80 dollar difference in per capita income and it has higher hdi and life expectancy than India.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 Keep giving excuses. India has more resources, larger population, got independence much earlier, larger labour force etc etc, still it got outcompeted by smaller countries like Bangladesh and Vietnam.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 So why much larger countries like China is richer than India despite current govt getting established 3 years after India's did ? Keep giving excuses for your incompetence.
"Incompetence can only be measure by CPI".
Source:Trust me bro.
No wonder you are being beaten by Bangladesh. Good luck with all that coping.
Amazing conversation ❤❤❤
I bet this is a civil service aspirants
Highly advanced country is 110 on hunger index and both its 'less advanced' neigjbours are doing better in this context. So no, thanks we are happy the way we are🤣🤣
Fajr Zuhr Asar Maghrib Isha and Witr Salah, Dua Qunoot ♥👌❤
Establish regular Salah and pay ZAKAT
India, Nepal, and Mauritius, the only 3 hindu majority states in the world. In terms of GDP per capita, Nepal is at no.151, India at no.130 and Mauritius at no.72. Bangladesh GDP is higher than India, at no.127 in the world. India's population is the highest in the world currently, but with a 130th position is truly embarrassing, showing extreme unproductivity or a critical failure in their system so idk why this bloke goes around yapping garbage
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 2024 is still ongoing, my dear indian enthusiast and when we do data comparison, we compare complete data. i'm from neither of those countries but my country is ranked in the top 5 but still, we feel grateful and help those who are in need while ya'll start yapping and start calling overseas hotlines boasting about your tiny GDP per capita, when the top 10 in the world are all about 50-60 times bigger than yours. and all this with an ongoing 2024 data. indians are just so proud of nothing.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 it's not IMF's fault but your own, for not knowing how to do basic comparison correctly. you seem to have a habit of pushing the blame of your own ignorance to others, which i suggest you drop it for your own growth.
Bangladesh has had higher (Nominal & PPP) GDP per capita in 2023 and (Nominal) GDP per capita 2022 than in india, both years proving basically they could walk into your country and live a more comfortable life than an average indian but i didn't see no Bangladeshi boasting and jeering india the way your people do? and why not compare yourself to Singapore then, a country that gained independence in the 1965, and see where it stands now.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 Can you explain why Bangladesh's life expectancy is higher than India's and also has higher HDI despite gaining independence several decades later ?
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688 Bangladesh is not a "small" country , it's population is bigger than Russia ! The fact you cannot explain why Bangladesh is more developed than India shows how clueless you are. In that case why bigger countries like China is more developed than India despite getting independence later ? Keep coping.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688Yeah india is doing so good economically that's why most of you live in UAE, Malaysia, Indonesia and europe. Even your multi millionaires and billionaires don't want to live in india I wonder why😂?
Also don't you guys claim you are the most ancient nation on earth? So that means you had plenty of time to develope then shouldn't you at least be 3rd or 2nd place worldwide in every category?
India is doing better economically because they have colonial allies. The success of colonial allies depends on subjugating others.
What nonesense! He started saying they developed by hinduism but later couldnt say one law that helped in developement. He was talking about cultures and traditions!!
Vedas the scripture that gave birth to 33 crore gods
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 yeah that drunk guy believes it
Pakistan was not given 40 crores which was promised as a part of partition.
The same reason why Godsey killed Gandhi.
The same leading Pakistan to go to IMF which turned into a rabbit hole and rest is history
JazakAllah'u khairan brothers
All India monuments which India earn all are given by Muslims and Mughals ...
Division of India and Pakistan is not justice because India capture 29 state and give Pakistan only two or three state...
All all earning places are captured by India ... This is the reason India is more developed then Pakistan 😊
In Gujrat some years before there was report dalits were beaten publicly. The allegations. Was that they ate cows..
It was reported and there was videos too.
Picture of "aggressive ignorance"
This muslim debaters completely lost 😂
Tamilnadu the place which he live never ruled by Mugals..
What an irony the ones who have suffered insults and discrimination for thousands of years from upper caste are defending the religion,in fact should be grateful for reservation and not religion.
Cholas invaded Orissa, Bengal, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand and built temples in those countries.
Salam from Ballarat, Australia!
This guy is denying the discrimination against Dalits in India. Is he really from India or trying to cover up an open fact. Dalits are converting to other religions. Is there any limit to this guy’s ignorance? May be, this guy is just trying to polish his English language skills here. Are other people not surprised from this guy’s Hindu mentality? I’m not surprised at all.
It is quite interesting listening to 4 witless blighters debate.
I will be looking forward to more.
What held him to wait for a reservation, how long they were waiting, why not his parents, grand parents were not in that rich wealthy Indian picture.
India mainly developed by gulf currency and beef exports
baraka ALLAHU fikoum
Equal footing is very important. In almost every aspect!
Foundation of development, education , and justice to all.
Bro had 10 cups of coffee that day!
Without milk
We should send him to pakistan . Such naive ideology of hindutwa brother a limited capacity to compare neighbour country , way why not compare with japan,china malaysia and so on.
This mofo should know most of history Pakistan always ahead of India until this last decade.
@@hihowareyouhihowareyou3688Pakistan is also much cleaner then India. This is a fact. I've been to both and despite pakistan's issue's it's also safer [less r-cases].
This muslim debaters completely lost 😂 When U say TV is Haram ,New technology is haram Then u become Pakistan 😂
These Hindu nationalist have an issue to distinguish Sanatan dharma from culture, traditions when on the first hand they claim everything to be hindu.
See there's a contradiction when you have seperated an identity of religion or Sanatan dharma from your culture or traditions, then what that means is you can't claim anything under identity of hindu and every region, land in geography is indipendent from the claims of sanatan dharma.
So ultimately you can only talking about a certain king or emperor not Bharat as a nation because you can't claim it's diversity under any umbrella other than sanatan dharma.
Chola kingdom invasion is hindhuism now . Yet they cry invasion of others to them.
Subhanallah Alhamdulillah Allah-u-akbar
That Tamil Hindu puts his own words into the mouth of the panel. 😀
It was Islam India brought The Name India brought Into the world
Why do we even accept GDP as a barometer??? I just don't get it. Surely we should judge things based on the living standards of the average citizen.
Come on guys I am from Maharashtra Nashik and i love beef ❤❤❤
We all have seen India land on the moon using a 1977 space invader game. Imagine in thse day's of digital cameras they couldn't shoot a decent footage of the moon landing.
Iam an muslim Indian. But let me tell that landing a rover on moon doesnt define success.
Sure its for research purposes, but no need to brag about it. Its just childish. Especially when mocking other countries.
And comming to your comment, in space normal electronics doesnt work. So they use different electronics which are costly.
And ISRO is not as rich as NASA, even their employees doesnt even earn much, R&D development budget is low. so yeah it looked in poor quality.
Befor mugals India was not a single country it was somany small small countries fight each other
He denied that Islam brought prosperity to India
so where did the 45 trillion that british took come from? and prior to that Mughal ruled India for roughly 300 years. So is it wrong to say Mughals were partly if not majorly responsible for the riches in India.
The guy lacks knowledge both about his religion and history logic, which is missing from his thinking a product of the bjp
🎉🎉🎉
Does Pakistan have Agricultural land same as india? Or materials which found in india?
Do he still make the argument fair Meta AI discovers the fact ,I asked Meta AI which revealed that before invasion also india became poor.
[13/09, 15:35] Alfaan: Does india had poor people before muslim invasion(or) British invasion? I think india has ? Right or wrong ?
[13/09, 15:35] Meta AI: India had poor people before Muslim and British invasions.
_Poverty in Ancient and Medieval India:_
1. Vedic Period (1500 BCE - 500 BCE): Social hierarchy, with Vaishyas (traders) and Shudras (labourers) facing economic challenges.
2. Mauryan Empire (322 BCE - 185 BCE): Economic inequality, with a small elite controlling resources.
3. Gupta Empire (320 CE - 550 CE): Social and economic disparities persisted.
_Causes of Poverty:_
1. Caste system
2. Limited economic opportunities
3. Social inequality
4. Regional disparities
5. Natural disasters and famines
_Muslim Invasion (11th-12th century):_
1. Disrupted trade and economy
2. Destruction of temples, universities, and libraries
3. Imposition of Islamic rule, leading to cultural and social changes
_British Invasion (18th-19th century):_
1. Exploitation of resources
2. Destruction of indigenous industries (textiles, iron)
3. Imposition of British education and culture
4. Economic drain (transfer of wealth to Britain)
_Poverty Rates (Pre-British Era):_
Estimates vary, but:
1. Ancient India: 10-20% of population lived in poverty
2. Medieval India: 20-30% of population lived in poverty
_Post-Independence Poverty Rates:_
1. 1950s: 50-60% of population lived in poverty
2. 1970s: 40-50% of population lived in poverty
3. 1990s: 30-40% of population lived in poverty
_Recent Trends:_
1. Poverty rates declined from 35.7% (2004-05) to 21.2% (2011-12)
2. 2020 estimates: 35.7% of population lives in poverty
India's poverty history is complex, with various factors contributing to economic disparities.
35:50 there goes his Dharma!!!
This is funny In one single breath he said Mughal invasion bankrupted the India and next comes British who stole 45 trillion pounds so where did this 45 trillion come from in Mughal period?
They are still earning from Mughal investments. Almost all famous monuments are from that era.
"Mr Display Name" displays shamelessly, in public, more ignorance and confusion than knowledge and understanding.
1- There is a failure to recognize the existing divide between India and neighbouring countries even by the usual measures of GDP per capita expressed in current international dollars corrected by purchasing power parity (PPP). Data from the World Bank indicate that though India's figures are higher than Bangladesh's and Pakistan's, they were lagging behind the latter until 2008. Part of the blame for the failure of economic policies in these countries should be laid at the door of politicians and may be largely explained by the repetitive coups d'etat and political instability. Nothing to do with Islamic theology or Islamic economics.
2- Surprisingly, the sense of over-triumphalism toward Bangladesh and Pakistan displayed by Mr "Display Name" does not extend to other neighbours. Bhutan and Sri Lanka have persistently higher GDP per capita than India. Does the evidence mean that their versions of Hinduism is superior to India's? Also, perhaps the reason for avoiding any comparison with China lies in the fact that the latter's GDP per capita figures are more than double India's. Again, does the evidence mean that China's version of Buddhism is superior to India's? No to mention the immense gap even with Middle-Income countries. So the question to Mr "Display Name" is: what Hindu teachings can explain India's economic success compared to Bangladesh and Pakistan, and failure compared to China and other countries with majority Hindu populations.
3- Seemingly, Mr "Display Name" has no answers to complex questions related to human, economic, and social development, which require a basic level of critical thinking. Alas, logical thinking seems to be suppressed, in the case of Mr "Display Name" by deep Islamophobia, and inhibited by sheer arrogance. Fast speech does not win arguments, and no amount of data analysis can help bridge these clear cognitive problems. A display of good knowledge, humility, and sincerity may.
@alimelmalak7907 I ❤how you refer to that delusional individual as mr. Display name as we can see in the screen😂. The reason he can't show his face is most likely cause he has some suspicious "business" from some shady mall or appartmentcomplex.
Where he and his "co workers" aka fellow [scammers] "work" their way into some old [whyte] lady's bankaccount overseas. Pretending to work for a pay-pal centre😂. They have to keep their identity a secret otherwise their only "source" of income is out the window LOL.
alimelmalak7907 I ❤how you refer to that delusional individual as mr. Display name as we can see in the screen😂. The reason he can't show his face is most likely cause he has some suspicious "business" from some shady mall or appartmentcomplex.
Where he and his "co workers" aka fellow [scammers] "work" their way into some old [whyte] lady's bankaccount overseas. Pretending to work for a pay-pal centre😂. They have to keep their identity a secret otherwise their only "source" of income is out the window LOL.
I am a Tamil muslim too.. These sangam era GDP data are all cooked up data..
Tamils suffered a lot only during the rule of Vijayanagar kingdom..
What amazes me is that when most Indian non-Muslims pride themselves on their country's success in landing on the moon. Yes! It is a scientific achievement to be proud of. But, isn't it also a contradiction that a large population lives in poverty and the cities lack basic Toilet amenities? I am not a biased person who favors Indians or Pakistanis because I am not Indian or Pakistani and respect both, but I visited both countries and found that Pakistani cities are more developed and clean with fewer beggars on the roads. Nations build modern cities and good economies and eradicate poverty before spending billions of $$$ flying to outer space.
Apparently they don’t even try to acquire any knowledge about their own religion.
Wait did he say landed on the south part of the moon and then spoke about religion? When the man himself, "The Missile Man of India', was a Muslim?!
Modern China started its journey on Oct 1st 1949 which Tamilian do not wants to compare with.
China has contributed almost three-quarters of the global reduction in the number of people living in extreme poverty over the past 40 years.
One pattern I noticed with Hindu arguemnets is that, when you show a contradiction in their vedas, they will say we took it out of context. And when you prove that you didn't take it out of context, then they claim that the problem is with our misinterpretation. And if you somehow prove it's not a misinterpretation issue, they will tell you it takes years of practice and education to decode the vedas.
I notice the same pattern with almost all of their arguments. They will kick the ball around and always try to blame something or somebody else. But they will never accept the fact that everything in their religion is messed up or the fact that this country is only going down.
Have you noticed how he went silent when you mentioned the fluid nature of dharma. Like they don't know what their dharma even is. I mean, would you say Hitler did his dharma well?
There's almost no distinction between the concept of evil and good. You can see this if you read Mahabharatha.
Alhumdulillah