4 stars because it doesn't have electronic gizmos like emergency braking aid etc. That decreased it's overall safety rating. The Pedestrian scores were also not that great, but in all honestly, who cares. From the video it's clear the car's structure is extremely well designed, most poles crash tests collapse the roof. All the frontal crashes don't even affect the doors or window structures at all. I'd say this is a safe car.
Watch the pole crashtest of the new aygo to see what a really sturdy construction looks like. Its a shame that a car of this price, and from a manufacturer That wants to be seen as 'premium' doesn't have a premium safetylevel allround. Audi is more name then fame. It scored extremly bad in the latest relaiabilaty tests too.
Michiel M I'm sorry but the Aygo, although did well, didn't seem to do any better than the TT in the pole test. Both cars roof didn't sustain much damage. The frontal impact of the TT did much better than the Aygo. Either way, you're comparing a sports car to a small car for some reason. Secondly, you clearly know nothing about new Audi and their safety because their new A3 is the only premium european compact car to receive 5 star rating from IIHS, NHTSA and Euro NCAP and absolutely passed the small overlap crash test with flying colours. www.autoevolution.com/news/2015-audi-a3-s3-crash-tested-both-get-five-star-ratings-video-90094.html Thirdly, Audi isn't more name than fame considering their Motorsport heritage and prestige, as well as being one of major premium car players, whether you like it or not, it's a fact and a fact for a reason. Yes, their cars at one point used to be ridiculously unreliable, but all manufactures go through that. Prior to their unreliable phase, they were extremely robust. Now they are reliable again and offer 2 additional years of full warranty on top of the original 4 year warranty for all CPO cars, so 6 years from inception date. If they weren't reliable now, they'd go bankrupt on warranty claims. Lastly, I've never owned an Audi, nor have any of my family member so no I'm not an Audi fan boy, but I call it as it is.
You should do your homework statement. First of all the Aygo costs 4 times less than the TT and scored just as good, so thats makes the TT's performance questionable. Second The Lexus CT200h scored full 5 stars, and did good in the smal overlap test like the Audi A3. So did the Prius+. The subaru Impreza is a topsafetypick for several years now, as almost every Subaru. A Suzuki Kizashi scored ' good' in the smal overlap tests in 2012, when every Audi ( and VW) failed miserablely. Then third the bad relaiabilaty of Audi. A dutch survey in 2014 showed serious flaws in costumers satisfaction due to engine and gearbox failures. A recent german longterm test of an Audi Q3 didn't end well either, with a complete fail of the expensive DSG gearbox. My conclusion is that the real quality is lacking in an Audi. Its just a premium feel the want to sell, with no real quality underneeth. But back to the disapointing performance of the TT in the crashtest. I really think its a shame that a car this expensive fails to deliver the premium performance you pay for.
Michiel M Just because a cheaper car out performs a more expensive one doesn't make the car better on all fronts. Your logic is so flawed, so I'll stop here.
I don`t know why anyone would give a car 4 stars due to the lack of emergency braking! Two weeks ago, a new mercedes eclass just dandomly breaked in front of me and we nearly collided. Afterwards, the driver told me, he hadnt breaked, there was propably just a leave or something hitting the distance sensor!
Hubert Walter LoL you should be banished of talking about cars just for thinking the fact that Audi doesn't care about safety. As ***** said, it was because of the new, more severe tests of 2015
Albert Arrabal How do they care about safety you self proclaimed expert? Advertised safety and real safety are two different things mr. smart ass. All safety they offer is the safety that is needed to meet regulations and tests, nothing beyond that. I don't see any major safety improvements in the last +/- 10 years that have been developed by Audi or the parent VW. The Audi A4 failed so bad in the IIHS small overlap. Stop ignoring facts.
They gave it 4 stars, because it doesn`t have an emergency braking assistant. But I really don`t know why anyone would give a car 4 stars due to the lack of emergency braking! Two weeks ago, a new mercedes eclass just randomly breaked in front of me and we nearly collided. Afterwards, the driver told me, he hadnt hit the breakes, there was propably just a leave or something hitting the distance sensor!
All cars should have side air bags, I don't understand why some companies skip on safety features for the sake of styling. I love how some car companies offer side airbags as OPTIONAL. Seriously.
It only got 4 stars because it underperformed. EuroNCAP rated it at 81% for occupants protection. That is really low such a new car. Almost all new cars from big manufatures are getting 85%+ and 5 stars. (Including other Audi's, it just seems the TT is not one of those)
Albert Arrabal Fuck you how the FUCK am I trolling? Misuse that word harder pls. "Audi's latest coupe is marked down to four stars in Euro NCAP crash test rating due to lack of safety tech" Moron learn to fucking read, if anyone is trolling it's you smartass.
Albert Arrabal Yes, AND the lack of electronic crash prevention systems caused this car to only have a four star rating. Try and think a bit more, please.
I think it must be 3 stars... 🤔who else? Remember the sideboard crashtest was bad, in the Front crashtest the dummy in the Bag was to mich hurts and and and (sorry Firma my Bad english)
Curley Pubes You should see the Jazz's NCAP test video. There's no class in these tests. This test puts the cars through the same testing mechanism and then calculates a measure denoting how safe it's occupants will be. Apparently, you'd be safer in a 5 star car than a 4 star one. Ultimately, it all depends on the situation. Audi drivers are much more prone to speeding, couple that with the fact that it's meant to be a performance-oriented car. Not that a 4 star rating is bad in anyway, but a 5 star one is obviously more superior to it.
+Zubin Gautam "The Euro NCAP impact tests simulates crashing a car into another of similar mass and structure. This means that the ratings can only be meaningfully compared between cars of the same type and size" from their own website. you should probably do more research before commenting. your car belongs to the super mini class. this tt to the roadster sports class. the report for this car also says the 4 start is because of lack of electronic collision mitigation technology which your car lacks too but is not expected from the cheaper classes of cars
4 stars because it doesn't have electronic gizmos like emergency braking aid etc. That decreased it's overall safety rating.
The Pedestrian scores were also not that great, but in all honestly, who cares.
From the video it's clear the car's structure is extremely well designed, most poles crash tests collapse the roof. All the frontal crashes don't even affect the doors or window structures at all. I'd say this is a safe car.
Watch the pole crashtest of the new aygo to see what a really sturdy construction looks like. Its a shame that a car of this price, and from a manufacturer That wants to be seen as 'premium' doesn't have a premium safetylevel allround. Audi is more name then fame. It scored extremly bad in the latest relaiabilaty tests too.
Michiel M could use real humans in the aygo test haha
Michiel M I'm sorry but the Aygo, although did well, didn't seem to do any better than the TT in the pole test. Both cars roof didn't sustain much damage. The frontal impact of the TT did much better than the Aygo. Either way, you're comparing a sports car to a small car for some reason.
Secondly, you clearly know nothing about new Audi and their safety because their new A3 is the only premium european compact car to receive 5 star rating from IIHS, NHTSA and Euro NCAP and absolutely passed the small overlap crash test with flying colours. www.autoevolution.com/news/2015-audi-a3-s3-crash-tested-both-get-five-star-ratings-video-90094.html
Thirdly, Audi isn't more name than fame considering their Motorsport heritage and prestige, as well as being one of major premium car players, whether you like it or not, it's a fact and a fact for a reason. Yes, their cars at one point used to be ridiculously unreliable, but all manufactures go through that. Prior to their unreliable phase, they were extremely robust. Now they are reliable again and offer 2 additional years of full warranty on top of the original 4 year warranty for all CPO cars, so 6 years from inception date. If they weren't reliable now, they'd go bankrupt on warranty claims.
Lastly, I've never owned an Audi, nor have any of my family member so no I'm not an Audi fan boy, but I call it as it is.
You should do your homework statement. First of all the Aygo costs 4 times less than the TT and scored just as good, so thats makes the TT's performance questionable. Second The Lexus CT200h scored full 5 stars, and did good in the smal overlap test like the Audi A3. So did the Prius+. The subaru Impreza is a topsafetypick for several years now, as almost every Subaru. A Suzuki Kizashi scored ' good' in the smal overlap tests in 2012, when every Audi ( and VW) failed miserablely. Then third the bad relaiabilaty of Audi. A dutch survey in 2014 showed serious flaws in costumers satisfaction due to engine and gearbox failures. A recent german longterm test of an Audi Q3 didn't end well either, with a complete fail of the expensive DSG gearbox. My conclusion is that the real quality is lacking in an Audi. Its just a premium feel the want to sell, with no real quality underneeth. But back to the disapointing performance of the TT in the crashtest. I really think its a shame that a car this expensive fails to deliver the premium performance you pay for.
Michiel M Just because a cheaper car out performs a more expensive one doesn't make the car better on all fronts. Your logic is so flawed, so I'll stop here.
Rayos veo este video y se me parte el corazon ver al audi mas hermoso del mundo chocar asi...
I don`t know why anyone would give a car 4 stars due to the lack of emergency braking! Two weeks ago, a new mercedes eclass just dandomly breaked in front of me and we nearly collided. Afterwards, the driver told me, he hadnt breaked, there was propably just a leave or something hitting the distance sensor!
Not bad at all. I think it only got 4 stars because of the new test modes.
It got 4 because audi does not care about safety. Profit is what counts, go see the results on the website especially for whiplash injuries.
TheEryk03 stick to your video games kid..
Hubert Walter LoL you should be banished of talking about cars just for thinking the fact that Audi doesn't care about safety.
As ***** said, it was because of the new, more severe tests of 2015
Albert Arrabal How do they care about safety you self proclaimed expert? Advertised safety and real safety are two different things mr. smart ass. All safety they offer is the safety that is needed to meet regulations and tests, nothing beyond that. I don't see any major safety improvements in the last +/- 10 years that have been developed by Audi or the parent VW. The Audi A4 failed so bad in the IIHS small overlap. Stop ignoring facts.
Hubert Walter I've decided that I'll ignore you and all your extremely stupid comments.
Havr a nice and safe crash with your Prius ;)
Looks like a 5 star test to me....
+AversaS look can be deceiving
Who drives an audi tt at 64 kmh (39.283 mph)?
Those who have seen videos like this and want to be alive after such a crash.
Me🤣🤣i drive like a turtle
did the grill came off?
It would be nice to up-load the MP4 HD version for the best result. Is this possible?
Build a car only to total it... YES!!!
+MrTwhispers yes, they are doing it just for fun...
Some new tests... Interesting... But only 4 stars :( and why is there no HD on this video?
Thats what i drive!
Solo 4 estrellas 😲 una más que el Ford ka del año 1998 que fuerte.
They gave it 4 stars, because it doesn`t have an emergency braking assistant. But I really don`t know why anyone would give a car 4 stars due to the lack of emergency braking! Two weeks ago, a new mercedes eclass just randomly breaked in front of me and we nearly collided. Afterwards, the driver told me, he hadnt hit the breakes, there was propably just a leave or something hitting the distance sensor!
On top of it, the auto emergency break is usually optional. Don't know too many people choosing to pay extra for it...
le Créatif Exactly!
+Kommentator lol so true
Kommentator fdfjkokji de laatste
In 1:00 the belt slides off the shoulder
вы ищменили тесты? на американский манер? тогда ждём 25%)))
0:54 the back seeter died😫
Maybe not no one knows
I Like It Audi TT 2015
I guess it had 4 stars because in the medium overlap test the lateral airbag ripped and it sprayed some engine liquid to the outside.
1:10 ahhhh my face because im sensitive lol
Unrealistic Test! Every Audi driver is speeding and never drives under 80 km/h!
Ye...YEAH!
Audi drivers are usually so fast :-(
only 4 stars? oh my...
Please remember, It's a whole new test.
+Peter Dzvoník yes because the tt does not have city emergency braking and losts 1 star.
the new tt is the safest coupe ever made
I'm still waiting for a crash test for the 2015 mustang before I commit to buying it........hint hint
Three tests at the end were permormed using a brand new car for each? If yes, what a shame and waste.
+GermanyTechno it is done with every car
+GermanyTechno unlike humans cars can be replaced after a real life crash...
In America some five star cars are rated poor by the Iihs namely the BMW X1 so imagine the four star cars ratings +Junkee1997
i think npw is audi T_T
I like Audi tts
Most Audis by now are safe
4 stars
lol what a shame, brand new audi and only 4 stars
The structure was fine, no crash mitigation = 4 stars
+m80pls What do you mean by crash mitigation?
Carbonized433 electronics to reduce severity
m80pls Oh right, so things like head rests popping forward? That's the only one I can think of
Carbonized433 just search on the internet, there is a detailed Wikipedia article called "Collision avoidance system" to get some basic info...
All cars should have side air bags, I don't understand why some companies skip on safety features for the sake of styling. I love how some car companies offer side airbags as OPTIONAL. Seriously.
It only got 4 stars because it underperformed. EuroNCAP rated it at 81% for occupants protection. That is really low such a new car. Almost all new cars from big manufatures are getting 85%+ and 5 stars. (Including other Audi's, it just seems the TT is not one of those)
no it didn't, it got 4 stars because of the lack of electronic aids to prevent crashes go read up on it
Albert Arrabal Fuck you how the FUCK am I trolling? Misuse that word harder pls.
"Audi's latest coupe is marked down to four stars in Euro NCAP crash test rating due to lack of safety tech"
Moron learn to fucking read, if anyone is trolling it's you smartass.
m80pls Nice words for a manga woman :P
Albert Arrabal >Manga
>Twilight dressed as solid snake
>ok
Albert Arrabal Yes, AND the lack of electronic crash prevention systems caused this car to only have a four star rating. Try and think a bit more, please.
4 Stars ? Omg error :D
что-то ауди подкачала)
почему? что не так по-вашему?
Всего 4 звезды, она из бумаги что ли?
4 звезды потому что нет системы предотвращения дтп, новое требование
5 звезд супер-пупер безопасная, 4 звезды - говно из бумаги?
@@the__pride113 а вы не знаете случайно сейчас эта система появилась?
A good Audi is still a dead Audi
i think 4 stars are enough
And the Airbags comea a little bit tool late
Deji
I think it must be 3 stars... 🤔who else? Remember the sideboard crashtest was bad, in the Front crashtest the dummy in the Bag was to mich hurts and and and (sorry Firma my Bad english)
Can't believe this 3X more expensive German car gets 4 star rating and my 2015 Honda Fit (known as 'Jazz' here in India) gets a 5 star one.
it's a 4 star for its class and yours is 5 Star for its. compared to your jazz is much much more safer.
it's a 4 star for its class and yours is 5 Star for its. compared to your jazz is much much more safer.
Curley Pubes You should see the Jazz's NCAP test video.
There's no class in these tests. This test puts the cars through the same testing mechanism and then calculates a measure denoting how safe it's occupants will be.
Apparently, you'd be safer in a 5 star car than a 4 star one. Ultimately, it all depends on the situation.
Audi drivers are much more prone to speeding, couple that with the fact that it's meant to be a performance-oriented car.
Not that a 4 star rating is bad in anyway, but a 5 star one is obviously more superior to it.
+Zubin Gautam "The Euro NCAP impact tests simulates crashing a car into another of similar mass and structure. This means that the ratings can only be meaningfully compared between cars of the same type and size" from their own website. you should probably do more research before commenting. your car belongs to the super mini class. this tt to the roadster sports class.
the report for this car also says the 4 start is because of lack of electronic collision mitigation technology which your car lacks too but is not expected from the cheaper classes of cars
It´s too rigid.