Have mercy it's the Lighlark Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 8

  • @raynorchen5602
    @raynorchen5602 Год назад +8

    Chocolate cake with ranch dressing - that's a yikes combo

  • @vanyavanilla7108
    @vanyavanilla7108 Год назад +4

    There’s a lot of things I could point out in this review. But since it’s Lightlark I’m not gonna blame anyone for getting stuff in this book wrong.

    • @talexratcliffe
      @talexratcliffe  Год назад +5

      I really tried to catch stuff and take notes but this book was costed in attention Teflon.

  • @ssswords
    @ssswords 2 месяца назад +1

    17:17 Don't you mean, *sneak* into conversation? I'll see myself out.

  • @porcelainchips6061
    @porcelainchips6061 10 месяцев назад +2

    Everything I have heard of this book, your review included, seems to point to the importance of asking why each element of a fictional setting exists. Why does there need to be a centennial event? Why does it need to be 100 days, or fifty days or whatever? What is the purpose of there being rules, or structure to it / what does it serve to do it one way instead of another way? And not the given explanations; what are the meta reasons these are being implemented? Here's a good one; why is it important, on a meta-writing level, for the lead character to have no magic powers in a magic world? Every review doesn't seem to cover a plot point that would prove it to be useful for the writer. The whole point of Hobbits seeming so physically weak compared other races of middle-earth is to then emphasize themes in the story. Why is the main character of Lightlark magic-less in a magical world? That seams like a "point" but from everything I've heard it serves no purpose.

  • @migmit
    @migmit 9 месяцев назад

    Um, no, past tense of "sneak" can be EITHER "snuck" OR "sneaked". Check Merriam-Webster, if you don't believe me. Check Wiktionary. Whatever.