Have you seen Jonathan Yeo’s portrait of King Charles yet?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Commissioned on behalf of the Drapers' Company, this monumental portrait of King Charles - the first to which he has formally sat as King - by the leading figurative artist Jonathan Yeo will be making its way to our gallery from Buckingham Palace, where it was recently unveiled.
The portrait will be on public view at the Philip Mould Gallery from the 16th of May until the 14th of June, Mondays to Fridays, from 9.30am until 5.30pm.
Entry is free. Booking is not required.
Find out more on our website: philipmould.com/
#TheButterflyPortrait #JonathanYeo #KingCharles #CharlesIII
The blood red color and the MK Ultra monarch butterfly symbolism fits.
The red represents blood. The 'King' is covered in it. And as he's fading into the background, so is the British monarchy. The monarchy represented by the monarch butterfly.
I think people misinterpret it. His hands are not covered in blood.. neither is his face. His uniform which literally stands for the monarchy is covered in blood BUT not the king himself. I think its their way of acknowledge the bloody history of the monarchy yet distinguish the King personally from the crimes of the past. (The Monarchy is covered in blood but the Kings hands are clean)
The picture Is terrible…
It is awful. Blood all over.
That's the point. This painter has the rare talent of being able to paint the essence of a person and not just the likeness.
Terrible. Wouldn't be surprised if it ends up in the Royal bin.
Have you seen the mirror image? When they are placed beside there is definitely a goats head… I don’t see how the artist could have accidentally painted this. Does he actually think of the Royal family in this evil way?
This is absolutely awful especially because the artist has the ability to paint beautifully. I would hope that the King has another artist paint an appropriate portrait. I think if we could hear the children looking at this 200 years from now as you stated…you would find them shocked and also wondering about how the Royal family could be made such a laughing stock.
I'd love to hear Mr Mould's comments on the work.
Me too! A raw and honest opinion.
What is your opinion on the portrait, William?
@@Johndeplume. I think the likeness is excellent. I do not, however, favour the preponderance of red. Mr Yeo has apparently said it is a tribute to the tunic of the Welsh Guards, which HM The King wears in the portrait, but I think it camouflages, rather than salutes, the uniform. I presume the butterfly and uniform juxtapose the gentleness and strength of an ideal monarch but, overall, I'm sorry to say that the work is a miss for me.
@@williamevans9426: A great appraisal, and I tend to concur with you. I haven't seen it in person, but I think he has the face right, with great depth (at least from what I can tell on my screen). The Monarch butterfly was a good touch, but overall, it looked unfinished.
I'd hope that someone in the manner of Ralph Heimans could be commissioned to paint a grand Coronation commission - he did an outstanding job of our late Queen's Diamond Jubilee commission, as well as almost every other commission I've seen him undertake. He is, of course, well liked by our Royal family, as well as others.
Keep well. 👍
@@Johndeplume. ... Nor have I seen the portrait 'in the flesh', so-to-speak. One visitor to the Mould Gallery commented that he found it better in person than via media representations - perhaps we're being too harsh!
You can find Philip's piece for the Telegraph here: www.telegraph.co.uk/art/artists/king-charles-portrait-jonathan-yeo-phillip-mould/
Looks satanic
Bold, striking, provocative, memorable. Love the colour and the symbolism of the monarch butterfly. Well done, Mr Yeo. It's a yes from me.
It’s growing on me. Think it suits the King’s personality.
Satanic
I like it. As some said, in person (which I pick up on) it's 3D so he looks life like. It's art, it's personal interpretation and not same old same Ole.
I find it tiresome
The Red Dragon being the national symbol of Wales is LITERALLY what gave King Charles his power, throne and great authority (just like Revelation 13:2 says) being known as the Prince of Wales for 54 years (before his recent coronation) giving him access and connections to powerful organizations and individuals. King Charles' Coat of Arms has the Imagery of the Beast. The dexter Beast in his his Coat of Arms (the Lion) has all the characteristics of the Beast (Revelation 13:2 writes them as similes meaning Saint John gave words to the vision he saw, describing what the Beasts' body resembled and if you Google "lion's feet" and "bear's feet" you wil quickly realize the clear difference between the two). The Unicorn in King Charles' Coat of Arms is the little horn of Daniel 7:8 and also has the three horns plucked up by the roots, and the Unicorn has human eyes (all Daniel 7:8). In the Coat of Arms, the chain on the Unicorn connected to the compartment of The Red Dragon is called a "restrainer" in heraldry (the Unicorn is restrained) and in a different version of the Coat of Arms, the Unicorn is no longer restrained and The Red Dragon is also different symbolizing the Devil's posession of Charles (when he becomes the Son of Perdition (2 Thessalonians 2:6-7). 666 Name Calculation: In order to do the Name Calculation of the Beast, the Imagery of the Beast needs to be present (which it is, and for other Antichrist candidates it is NOT, this is where people have typically gone wrong) and his name and title did indeed calculate to 666 using the exact Hebrew Numbering System identified in the Hebrew of Revelation 13:18, with the exact Hebrew spelling the Israeli press have used for Charles. The calculation did in fact come out as 666 in BOTH English and Hebrew (which is mathematically impossible, this is God giving us CLEAR indication that this is the right individual). In Daniel 9:27, the Hebrew root word of "confirm" means "to make strong" or "strengthen". The name Charles in Germanic languages literally means "strong man" or "to make strong" (see the connection?). The Abomination of Desolation Statue ALREADY exists! Google "King Charles Saviour of the World Statue". A root word in Daniel describing the Abomination of Desolation Statue is "winged". The Statue of Charles portrays him as a GOD, WINGED, dressed only in a loincloth, above the Earth with people underneath. A miniature version was gifted to Charles while he was on a trip to Brazil, giving him credit for the success of the COP Climate Meetings (he gathered the participants beforehand on his Royal Yacht Britannia to ensure the success of the meetings) and was given the statue after. THIS is the Statue that will be placed in the Third Temple merely YEARS from now! A full size version exists, 10 cubits in height, the SAME height as the Cherubim Statues placed on both sides of the Ark of the Covenant in the Second Temple.
For full breakdowns of all this - and HOURS of a lot more look up "Author Tim Cohen" on YT and go to his channel, or go to "Janie DuVall" channel and find videos there. Tim Cohen exposed Charles in 1998 (BEFORE the statue was even made). God bless ✝
Awful!
It's a good painting and I like it because it's honest. It's bold not just in color but in having the gall to give this man a portrait of himself drenched in gore. The butterfly is a nice touch. Notice how it too is painted over in red and how it doesn't actually touch the subject.
The butterfly represents nature, and it represents Charles, himself. The red is the world ablaze, as global warming takes our natural world apart. It speaks to the irony of somebody so mindful and one of the first public voices to speak on the subject of climate change, is now at the top of the tree that that started capitalism and war.
Very poignant.
The monarch butterfly is a well-known MK Ultra symbol.
bold is one word for it.
Can you honestly think of anyone wanting that picture hanging in their home...think about
it, how about in your home...da...
Why not? It's too big for any of my walls but I'd certainly enjoy having a painting by the artist if I had the room.
It was painted for a specific purpose, it's never meant to be in anyone's home.
I think it represents the horrors of monarchy well. But i find the butterfly tacky.
The monarch butterfly is a well-known MK Ultra symbol. A CIA mind-control program that the British government was up to their eyebrows in.
A butterfly flits from one interest to another without much influence and surely the background colour should be purple?
Love it!
The secret volcano manor boss in elden ring
The color is fitting since he lived such a way that caused harm to all he touched.
What?
Which is complete and utter nonsense, but do continue to display your stupidity to the world.
🥱
🙄
Please. You are thinking of Henry the 8th 😂
Someone else could do a more traditional portrait.
It doesn't appeal to me aesthetically.😏
This is the end my Friend....
Ghost busters painting
I think it’s very good
Awful!
I actually like it.
APPRECIATE this video of likes and unlikes from the People…..I LIKE it….and do BELIEVE it will grow on the consciousness of the People over time…..
An interesting painting. As for the red, I would go with it being a lucky and auspicious colour, associated with the fire element, which represents life, vitality, and light. Because it's viewed so positively, red symbolizes happiness, success, and good fortune. Long live the King and may there be many more wonderful portraits for Mr. Mould to exhibit!
It represents blood. The 'King' is covered in it. And as he's fading into the background, so is the British monarchy.
@@nontoxicpaint I did not ask for your opinion. But since you seem to have the need to reply to my post, here's mine: what it represents to you is a reflection of your own toxic mind.
Man, what reality are you living in? The first thing which comes to mind when someone sees a man in red, is blood.
But you are aware, that the King and queen and the whole monarchy is funded by taxes and other money hauled out from UKs inhabitants. This red thing also, I think and there are people in the UK who dont know how to feed their children.
Got to do something with all that contaminated blood.
Love it
* Elden Ring boss music * has entered the chat
He's the secret boss in shadow of the erdtree dlc
It's horrible. I've seen so many memes with this portrait, which tells you just how awful it is.
I like it.
really like it. Very symbolic and compassionate portrait.
It is very symbolic but not in a good way!
I love it!
too big for my wall
Clever painting. The face is close to life as is the butterfly. Butterflies have short lives and different phases before they reach adulthood of being a butterfly. Can say that about the human depicted. Then again a butterfly's wing beats in China and is felt across the world. Thus every action, every atom is connected.
The colour red has many interpretations. The one probably most associated with the sitter is sins. Then death and cause of deaths.
The painting is strong. Interesting in that the picture gives the audience power to say what the artist and or sitter are saying to viewer. Whereas the viewer can allow personal reasons finding the sitter guilty or innocent of past history. While the artist is just the hand that transforms the perception of sight into a moment of reality.
SMH
I think it is very innovative! 🫠😇💘💝💖
SUPER LAME ! lol 😅