Ref loses control of soccer match!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- Ref loses control of soccer match as he decides not to give anyone cards on any body checks or rough tackles so the game late in the 2nd half really gets out of hand as Laguna United defeats Fram 3-2, with a late goal during a head injury where play should have been stopped right away
Do you need videography services?
Contact: George Langevin Productions
We do sports, live events, theatre arts, or editing.
www.langevinproductions.com
Videographer since 1987, serving all of Southern California.
Experts in special event video through out the USA!
Find us on Facebook here:
/ glpvideos
Check us out on Twitter:
/ glp_productions
• Ref loses control of s...
#georgelangevin #georgelangevinproductions #sportsvideo #sportsvideography
The kid ran straight into to goalie , dry your eyes and get on with the game
Seriously, i played it back slowed down and he ran into the goalie very clearly. It looked like he ran into a fucking wall, though. That kid is rock solid. That was amazing.
Yes but the guy rolled around crying... obvious red card
WorkingClassMan yeah bro
Bro I’m a goalie myself if I got called on something like that I would go ape shit on that ref
Exactly
The goalkeeper was perfectly entitled to stick his arm out to protect himself from that disgraceful challenge in the opening bit of the video. There is no requirement to allow yourself to be bulldozed by an opponent. White player will think twice before doing that again.
Dude, why do I always find you in some random videos? 😂
It wasn't even a challenge, the white player just ran full speed into him.
And his arm was already sticking out when he was running
They also had a problem with the ref not stopping the game because the player was on the floor, in doing so, the orange team ended up scoring. I'm not sure what the rules used to be back then though.
@@antoniolandos1650 as in immediate obstruction play has to stop, otherwise, play continues to next normal stoppage and is noted as injury stoppage
Ref had full control of game, You just didn’t like his decisions
Are you braindead lmao
@@bonden5167 yeah i think he is
The player in the white shirt ran into the keeper if you didnt see
@@bonden5167 I think you're the brain dead one. The ref never lost control of the game
I think he made the right calls 🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
Although i am really confused about the restart after the card to the keeper lol it should be a PK unless he was calling a foul against the attacker and carding the keepers reaction???
The ref literally made the right call every time. What am I missing?
Americans 🤣
nothing, the players, parents, and coaches just can’t behave themselves
Ref made the right call but the red was really not a red like a yellow and what did the goal keeper do to get the yellow
The yellow card to the gk was totally wrong and I wonder how he resumed the game (he can't take only the disciplinary action without a technical one if the ball is in play). As a ref, I can say that the colleague in the video has totally lost the control of the game. In our activity, it's important not only taking right decisions, but most of all that our decisions (also wrong decisions) are accepted by players and trainers and that they recognize our authority on the pitch. The ref in the video has lost his authority from the moment in which he let the coach yell at him in front of his player without taking any disciplinary action. From that moment, the player has done whatever they wanted and this has culminated with that terrible foul and an anaboidable red card.
Ignorant parents.
"Ref, that was a charging foul" hahahaha I'm dying😂😂😂
El Stupido Stupido lmao he be out here saying basketball rules
You can get fouled for charging in soccer now
TBS_ Lexi never call it soccer
Looool. Your name is perfect for what that parent said. 😂
@@xr7_nv348 fuck you I am Mexican I play basketball and my second sport is soccer
That player ran straight into the goalie and got weight roomed, no foul on the goalie.
What the offender did is the oldest trick in the book to😂
wrong
My 12 year old daughter and I were watching that, and even she knew that's goalkeepers ball, because she is a goaly
+Steve Coty As a goalie that's not necessarily true. Players are still entitled to challenge for the ball in a fair, safe manner. Just because you're a goalie doesn't entitle you to further protection under the laws of the game.
That said, it was a fair challenge from the GK imo.
I mean it the ball was clearly in possession of the goalie. He made a long touch on the ball and you can see the idiot in white take a huge step to get in front of the goalie. Had the keeper not maintained control of the ball after the collision there should have been a foul on the white player. Since i retained control i can only assume that the ref gave advantage and let play continue.
The goalie didn't foul the player the player ran into the goalkeeper with no intention of getting the ball
Ikr
Honest to god the kid ran into the goalies outstretched elbow... Should've been a foul on the white-shirt player.
Though, to be fair, the ref really should have stopped play for any head injury.
+Stephen Malacaria This is a difficult thing to do in these circumstances--the referee is tracking the ball and running to the other side of the field, trying to keep the bell between himself and the assistant referee who would be "lower right side" or the screen. The "lower right side" assistant referee is focused on the offside line on the other half of the field. Neither one of these referees should be even looking in the direction of the injured player--their attention and line-of-sight is elsewhere. The only referee with a chance to see this is the "upper left side" assistant referee, who has no way to convey this to the others in dynamic play. IF center referee had realized the injury, play should have stopped. But we cannot ex post facto stop play. Goal should count, as it did.
+James Johnson The keeper didn't have to throw an elbow.
+Erik Morrissey Keeper's elbow was out before the forward even got to him. That was not an elbow, that was a forward running into the keeper. If anything - foul on the forward. Since there was no advantage realized, good no call.
Ref here. Apologies if I’m missing something, but I don’t see anything really wrong with most of these calls. In the first clip, the goalkeeper protected himself from a charging player. The force of the GK may have taken him down, however this is not a foul, and does not warrant a stoppage in play unless the player had a severe head injury. The second call was also correct, as the goalkeeper attempted to nitpick at the player and was caught in the act, being issued a caution as stated in IFAB. The red card was deserved as well; the studs were up, the challenge was late, there was no contact with the ball, and it endangered the safety of the opponent, all IFAB laws that warrant an ejection. After the tackle you can also see the player put his studs into the fouled player’s back. The only thing I hope is that the referee had a talk to the player who shoved the player that was sent off. While he was further endangering the opponent, a shove was not needed, however nothing should be issued to that player than a talking to. Just my view, you’re entitled to your opinion 🙃
absolutely agree
Hopefully the white team lost the match..
I think they did. Look at the description :)
yeah cause that challenge at the end was so called for
Racist
@@edjones8061 Cry about it😭
@@notOL01 i think he is being sarcastic, i hope so☠️
As an American, I apologize for these players and parents that think they have a say for the call.
I agree
Blame Europeans for bringing this soft sport. When you see the pros roll around for 30mins it transfers to the youngins.
@@butchcassidy8307 WHAT IS YOU TALKING ABOUT MAN... have you seen players in italy.. you obviously don't watch football
Butch Cassidy Tried to get tackled like that yourself and see how it feels like.
Zhenyu Huang I’ve played soccer. Again, it’s nothing to other American sports as far as mentality and physical abuse. Rugby is more of a comparison. You’ll never see those guys flailing around just to get a card, theatrics or not.
What some Parents & coaches fail to understand is that the referee is in charge, not them, these moronic Parents ruin games for everyone including their own Kids, who have to see & hear this crap!
roy theboy omg yes and some parents can be annoying like once a parent from the opposite team was being so ride to me and she would comment on how bad I play and she would try and tell me what to do on the field and I was like stfu bitch 😂
I agree I’ve played soccer for 8 years I’m still playing now and the #1 rule is the referee’s decision is FINAL and they call plays based on spirit of the game
But no. I had the exact same experience last fall and the ref should’ve gotten fired. My coach ran onto the field yelling at the ref after half our team got hurt
@@rcole25_soccer you're just a player. I'm a ref AND a player and as a player I'm still almost always wrong
@@omarsahibzada5117 the other team literally tackled us and the ref was a player for the opposing club
Someone appealing for a charging foul is a soccer game is one of the most American things I've ever heard.
"ref that was a charging foul" lol
Should have been at the line for a couple of free throws
But the goalie just ran a straight line, the white guy ran into him why would he just run at him like that he made no attempt to go for the ball
Haha, yeah right.
Ref did a good job. Idiot spectators.
Law 12
Direct and indirect free kicks and penalty kicks can only be awarded for
offences and infringements committed when the ball is in play.
1. Direct free kick
A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences
against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless,
reckless or using excessive force:
• ***CHARGES***
• jumps at
• kicks or attempts to kick
• pushes
• strikes or attempts to strike (including head-butt)
• tackles or challenges
• trips or attempts to trip
what does that even mean
Keeper did nothing wrong it’s not basketball charging on the keeper 😂
I thought the same thing but i think he elbowed him in the face on purpose
christisn salas no its human instinct the kid literally ran into him wtf did he expect 🤣🤣
@@sellouttttttt2538 human instinct or not if you lung out your elbow to a face even if to protect yourself...its a foul. With no elbow if the kid ran into his shoulder id say yeah kid got what he deserved lol...but im pretty sure i see an intentional elbow
christisn salas the keeper had his elbow out before the kid even ran into him
@@ronak2127 its hard to say...maybe your right ..
Lmfao, the kid in the white tried to check the goalie and the goalie only stood his ground. Applause to him.
Yea your right 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
You are right the keeper stood his ground
He stood his ground in a game of foot ball what did the guy in white pull a gun on him the goalie delt with it terribly he could have just kicked it away but nope he charge tackled him
DerpyTrollGamer facts
The player in white ran into the keepers elbow it's his fault
As a fellow goalie, this man did nothing wrong. He's just a brick wall.
... that is NOT a foul. The player rammed into the goal keeper. If anything its the goal keeper who should get the free kick. smh
+shane lobato You are CORRECT this is NOT a foul as the Ref played Advantage... Another words the keeper had possession of the ball and the opponent charged the keeper once he charged the keeper and tried to knock him off the ball, the keeper was able to maintain possession of the ball therefore advantage played out. Now having said that at the next stoppage if I were the ref I would have yellow carded white for that charge as he didn't look like he was even trying to play the ball. The coach was out of line and as the ref I would have handled him differently
Next Play DOES look like OFFSIDE CALL was missed
Next when the keeper looks to be taunting the two attackers he gets a Yellow, I didn't really see a foul but it could be for Unsporting Behavior
Next Play was the thrown in where yellow pushed white during stoppage-I would have red carded that player
Next Play was a slide tackle -That was called correctly but I believe a red was due to the white player who pushed the carded player also for Violent Conduct
Overall the video title is not really accurate as I didnt see this game get out of control
+shane lobato By addressing your comment to all Americans as if we all think alike is your personal prejudice. A well-rounded understanding of the world and its people would be good for you
I totally agree and then after that it seemed the players in white started getting a little pushy. And the kid getting booted at the end that was a close call. Free kick maybe but ejection
+Legendary CR7 He did indeed but that not makes it a foul. He try to hit him he was avoiding a collision. The player made this fault. Second action with keeper if you see at hitting some one it should be red and a penalty (which it even was with yellow).
Wait the ref did nothing wrong
Actually, the restart after the Caution to the GK is questionable; it looks like he was going to drop the ball. What was the Caution for, other than the GK pushing the attacker or swinging his arm at the attacker (which would be attempting to strike)? When play is stopped for a DFK foul, it should be a DFK restart, in this case a penalty kick. The more sensible approach would be to say the game was stopped for misconduct by both attacker and GK and restart with an IFK for the defending team since the attacker's misconduct was committed first.
Unsporting behavior is misconduct and is not a DFK or an IFK. Ref screwed up by not throwing out white coach and for not cautioning white players for charges. Red card was a joke, questionable that was even a foul, let alone a yellow, no way in hell a red.
What do you mean UB is not a DFK or IFK? What is a tactical foul if not UB and a DFK? What is a reckless foul if not UB and a DFK? What is simulation if not UB and an IFK? I'll agree the coach should have been expelled from the field, but you think the tackle into the legs wasn't even a foul? Have you ever read the Laws of the Game? The scissors action on that play is a classic example of endangering the safety of an opponent - Violent Conduct.
Ben Justice I agree
UB is misconduct, which is not a foul (although UB may arise FROM a foul, it is distinct)--your examples of reckless foul or tactical foul are UB. But "UB" does not equal foul. UB may arise FROM a foul. If I'm centering that match, I've giving YC's to both attackers for challenging the goalkeeper (which is an IFK), a YC to the goalkeeper for his post-foul swing, and then restarting with an indirect free kick for the GK's team. I suspect this is what was called (except that referee decided against cards).
The restart is clearly going out, which makes no sense if the referee was actually calling this based on the GK's swing--in this case, this would be "Attempts to strike", which is a DFK foul, thus a penalty kick would be the restart. So clearly this is not what the referee called.
Either he made an error in restart, or he went with the idea that play had already stopped by the actions of the two attackers. (I just don't understand why no card).
By the way, I am in agreement with you on the scissors tackle being a red, but it is "serious foul play"--still red, but not as severe a sanction as Violent Conduct.
Cheers
If you run head first into a brick wall, blame the brick wall.
thank you somebody actually understands
"The ref clearly should have given the goalie a card after that white team's player tried to tackle him with his face and failed."
-George Langevin
George Langevin lives and breathes the sport. Undoubtedly. He also bravely talks smack to young children.
There is no such thing in football (a.k.a. soccer in some circles...) as a "check". This is not hockey, as we can clearly see there is no ice on the field and players wear no protective gear. You are only allowed to push your opponent on the shoulder when trying to win possession of the ball.
0:24 “that is a charging foul” wtf is this basketball?🤦🏽♂️
There IS a charging foul call in soccer. This was not one of them.
Ghostlygamer25 bru dO u play basketball lol
The person who titled this vid is either high, drunk
Or American
Aaron Zimmerman he’s probably American so he is was probably the first 2 as well
As an american this had me rolling 😂
It’s called football
Bill Teasdale why yall hate America so much
Or a pendejo
Charging foul, this isn't backetball?
Charging is a foul.
Charging an opponent is a foul is soccer under Law 12. Whether the parent screaming actually knew this or was merely fortuitous is debatable.
Victor de Meireles The parent was still wrong, the goalie wasn't the one who charged. The one who charged was the kid that sprinted into the goalie
Haha charging is in hockey too
Christian McBride I totally agree. The parent was totally wrong. I was making light of the fact that man parents invent violations like playing on the ground. At least this one yelled , albeit incorrectly, about a real violation.
I thought the ref did a pretty good job. Never stay near an injured player once the coach or trainer comes on the field you're only going to get dissent. The only issue I had was when he carded the goalie at the 1:20 Mark the only restart you can possibly have is a PK. He obviously called some type of foul on the goalie inside the penalty area and the only possible restart is a direct free-kick for the opposing team which would be a PK.
Yes I agree with you. Ref gives YC to goalie in penalty area when the ball was in play.
Not as I saw it. The stoppage in play wasn't caused by the goalie. The card was for unsportsmanlike conduct by the keeper during the stoppage when he flicked the kid's ear or whatever it was (couldn't really see to well)
I woulda carded all 3 of them
@@scotthenderson873 at the very least the white players needed a verbal warning if that was the first time they did that
@@ejmckay2445 if thats you case, they other two players would have been carded to and an IN-DIRECT fk given, some many guys forget this exists. and even if it was given against the GK, the other players also prevented the goalkeeper from releasing the ball. which in itsself, is a free kick XD people gotta learn the rules if they wanna play
That wasn't a foul (phh Americans) the white player when straight into him. great goal though. Actually good reffing, if anyone wants to argue with the ref they should know what the fracking laws are, jesus.
WTF Reef did great !!!!! Who ever posted this has has ZERO knowledge about soccer !
MiXA28 np
@Vain Totuus how are you supposed to control angry idiots that have zero knowledge about football?
They watch too much on tv with the pros diving and having fouls given to them for fouls that aren't fouls
AidanCD its soccer in america
He did have control of the game. He handled the situation well.
In every clip i personally think the ref made the right calls. In the first clip the goalie just stood his ground and was bigger
Correct,it looked like the dude ran into the goalie.
Hugh White
Suarez, the super fake head injury actor!
KEN GUNPLA please, he acted out. look at him when he falls, I saw kids at 8 in hockey getting up after getting nailed illegally into the boards
KEN GUNPLA yeah but that was a dive, and the white team would loose the momentum and possession. Maybe do like in Hockey, if one is injured, you don't blow the whistle for like 30 seconds (max 45 or a 1min if he is on his knees but shaken up) unless if the injured player's team takes position of the puck
MrTehnoobshowfan i think that you are absolutly right
The fact that the coach spent more time bitching at the ref than checking on the well-being of his player (assuming the player wasn’t acting) tells me everything I need to know
100% agree disgraceful behavior.
"What do you want me to do? I'm not a doctor!"
there is no way on planet earth that first incident was a foul... the guy was just running too fast to stop...
The last challenge was probably a red...
Totally agree. The first one was never a foul. They just collide.
Agreed. The injured player initiated the contact by running in front of the much larger goalie. I agree with the no call.
Andy Jayroe If anything, considering how hot the game was at that point, it'd be a yellow for the injured player.
Oh, the first one was clearly a foul. I can't imagine any player coming in with that much speed, missing the ball entirely, and making contact with the opponent with that amount of force not being a foul.
It's just the it was the white player who committed the foul. The fact that he got injured doing it is irrelevant.
Reverse it in your mind: If that goal keeper came in late, missed the ball, and struck that attacker with that much force everyone would be screaming for a foul.
William Guynes you clearly don't know anything about football... no offence ;)
Check the FIFA rules for a foul... :)
the clear difference between both sides' supporters are that the yellow team's parents, which are mexican (presuming there accent), actually know about soccer while the white team's side, which are americans, clearly dont know jack about the game by saying "charging foul" or some other bs. Plus, the yellow team is focusing more on calming down and just playing the game, even the goalies dad told him to calm down in spanish, while the white team side was completely immature and unprofessional the whole time, and the coach shouldve been sent out cause they arent allowed to talk bad about the ref or enter the pitch at all. And they say mexicans are the dirty ones.
Pretty much sums up my whole experience on the pitch.
they are from Florida relax
Hella True I'm Mexican we know soccer more than whites they should just stick with football
VertixxJJ 23 that moment when you are racist af
harrellbrad lmao
"hmm I wonder if I can tackle the goalie if he is running towards me full speed, oh and he is much bigger that me" -runs into goalie and falls back." FOUL ON THE GOALIE!" 😂😂
Why did the player just run in to the goalkeeper 😂 What did he expect
The first play was absolutely not a foul: player ran straight into the goalkeeper, and fouled the keeper with appropriate advantage played. The keeper's arm was in a natural position and he didn't cock his elbow up at all. However, I would have stopped play for a potential head injury
agreed. Should have stopped play and then restart with a dropped ball
If you stop play for that and give a drop ball ...you are penalizing the team that did no wrong and this will give motivation for aggressive teams with reckless players the freedom to ram Into players willing to hurt themselves knowing that if they dont get what they want on the play at least the play will be stopped
That said if the player looked knocked out then obviously....but we have to remember we have players that do act up the foul and it is hard to always recognize it
Player safety and potential concussions are more important than scoring a goal.
I Agree about that but no way of knowing if the refs saw or believed the kid was hit in the head ..the kid ran into the goalie and he fell pretty good from his own momentum its gonna happen and nothing was malicious by the goalie so play continues until change of possession..the goal occurs in the next 6 touches in 15 seconds...not exactly an excessive amount of time at all..players will absolutely abuse the loophole of slamming into people if it stops the offensive teams momentum...the other team was more upset about the goal occurring...or trying to frame the goalie as the attacker
No Foal By The Goalie !
White Team Is Provoking The Goalie
Not only were they provoking the goalie, they were obstructing him from taking the kick.
I’m a casual viewer at best and even I knew that
How can parents who watch their kids not know the rules of the game their kid is playing?
@@jackjon7763 US parents?
Still a foul and yellow card. The Referee should have whistled for obstruction
"Upon the review of the plays
goalie was in possession of the ball,
goalie's heading was not towards white jersey,
white jersey was never in possesion of the ball,
white jersey's heading was directly towards goalie,
goalie protected his possession of the ball without breaking any rules.
White jersey coach should had been yellow-carded.
Second play,
yellow jersey tackled white jersey sideways,
white jersey wins an Oscar award for his acting.
That should had been a yellow card to yellow jersey.
Third play,
goalie is in possesion of the ball when two white jerseys taunt him,
both white jerseys step in front of him within inches to goalie's face,
ref lets the crowd pressure get to him and unfairly yellow cards goalie.
That should had been a warning to both white jerseys.
The whining crowd gets a yellow card for being such moaning little bitches."
Mauricio Muñoz disagree about the goalie he clearly pushes/swings at the white player earning himself the card, but spot on review otherwise and they were definetly taunting him and it worked
If ref's purpose is to keep game "under control" then he did a lousy job keeping white jerseys under control.
As a referee, I completely agree, the only thing I thought was that the throw-in directly before the tackle ( which was a yellow IMO) was a foul throw, as he throws it down from in front of him not releasing it above the head as he should
@@mauriciomunoz6223 - having the parent section hosed-down should be an option for any referee in a youth match. I know I wanted to assemble these morons and hose them all down, retroactively. Is anyone here from the club(s) involved here? Could we make this happen?
@@aidanhagley8805 I'd probably give that a red also. Dangerous tackle. Coming from the side and lunging in isn't a great tackle, hard to see from that angle alone though and i'd give it to the ref for giving a red.
The only thing I don't like about the ref, is that he didn't card the coach for dissent.
i don't think the ref lost control of the game. the only one he missed / overlooked was the push off the pitch. he got all the other decisions right imo. the parents / coaches should be ashamed of themselves for their continued abuse and insightful statements. end of.
stuart bradley damn you stupid
@@noahrodriguez2185 how exactly? Ref did well, coach and parents clearly dont know the rules of football
Not the second call, he was all good
Hugs Epiphany Referees have to deal with abuse constantly in every game. All they can do is continue to referee the game. That's what happened here. He didn't lose control.
When he yellow carded the goalie he should’ve blown it dead earlier and carded the two players who got into the goalies face
I'm a soccer player from the us these spectators don't know shit.you can't run at a goalie and think he won't do anything.
You don't "no" shit about spelling
no, you're a football player.
no, you're a football player.
Adam Bratvold well first of all it's keeper not goalie and second the keeper can't do anything more than 2 hand push
jimmy johnson your are right but you dont have to be a soccer player to know that, its common sense
coach or whoever that guy was, should be expelled from the game. youre not allowed to run into the field, at all!
finally a smart one.
I am assuming that the referee summoned the coach on the field to deal with the injured player. Now, he could have been tossed out for argument, considering how aggressively he was pursuing the issue, and the fact that he was ignoring the injured player to yell at the official.
agree players hurt coachs get u butts on the fild
ru8en v I semi agree but in the coaches defense he was doing what a coach should do which is defend his players
Against the ref who let play go because his player was the one that caused this? That argument makes no sense.
Esse Baharmast, a HOF ref, once told a group of us USSF refs that calling fouls in the pros is easy, b/c the skill level of the players is very high. Calling fouls at the
You can’t run into a goalie. Foul on white. You can’t push another play 1:56 . Foul on white
The ref struggled but the parents don’t know what they are talking about
Charlie M i swear I’d punch the shit outta him if he kept pushing me 😂😂
Do Americans make new rules at every sport?
@@d-24 Just the parents do...have to justify the bellyaching somehow....and when their team loses, they can all blame the officials.
you're right.
you can run into a goalie if he's out of the penalty area (which he is). once he leaves that box he forfeits all of his GK privileges and it is treated like any other non-GK player interaction.
That foul throw at 2:02 though.
Sorry Paul, I don’t understand how that’s a foul throw
Jawsh Clippos are you mad that’s a clear foul throw, if they throw it to the ground then it’s illegal
Thomas Newling-Ward what about the people who can’t do a good throw in that guy could very well be trash at throw ins and that’s the best he can do
@@seju9959 dude, literally no one would do that bad
@@Feriux11 people would believe me
The white teams parents need to read a long book about how soccer/football is played. The first “foul” wasn’t even a foul. The white team player ran straight at the goalie and smashed into him and fell down. Then the white teams parents were yelling things like “charging foul” and “straight red”.
What do Americans no about the beautiful game...
I been playing goalie since I was 6 years old, and the goalie did absolutely nothing wrong his body is 2x bigger than the guy who ran straight at him with no intention on fighting for the ball read ur shit first before talking shit and saying it’s the goalies fault his elbow wasn’t even raised
Armando Pineda it wasn’t a foul but everyone who is saying the ref did nothing wrong are forgetting that when there is a head injury, play needs to be stopped.
@@garymitchell854 "What do Americans no about the beautiful game..."
I guess we no knowthing.
@@SARDiverDave correct ...nothing ..so much so you called it Soccer......the rest of world call it football ...
The low iq commentary from the sidelines was unbearable 🤣
I like how people are yelling "foul on the goalie". If anything it's a foul on the striker for not playing the ball. Good play from the goalie. Unfortunately he screws up by smacking a player later in the game. I don't see in any way the ref losing control. He actually does a good job. The only thing I think he could be criticized for is for not giving a yellow to the player who shoved the guy who was about to get the red. The spectators seem like a bunch of idiots though, especially the guy yelling, "foul on the goalie, offsides, that was a charging foul, he elbowed him in the face, ref you have more authority than that you can do better". And if I were the ref I would have told the coach after he started yelling about his player who wasn't fouled that one more word about it and he would be gone.
That's the worst thing about being a referee. Getting shit from players and sometimes even coaches is one thing - it's the parents that are the absolute worst. They're obnoxious, distracting and they yell, scream and criticize everything you do, usually without having the slightest clue of what they are talking about. I've been coaching since I was 13, I've coached games with parents like the ones above when I was just a kid.
It's bloody horrible, makes me hate the game I used to love.
Kristian Jörgensen I've seen my fair share of terrible parents as a player, coach, and ref. I've had to kick the same coach off the field two separate times. I've coached for over 10 years and fortunately I've had great parents who sometimes yelled, but never got mean or obnoxious. A lot of that has to do with teaching the game to the parents at the same time as the kids.
As far as players, I was surprised to find that girls between 13 and 17 years old are the absolute worst. The only games I've had to abandon were girls games. Boys usually take the hint after the first couple of yellows. Some girls however, just don't care.
This was not a foul at all from the goalkeeper. Sorry to say but the coach that is going off is just blinded by the fact his player got injured. The player ran full speed into the goalkeeper. Not his fault. The complaints show a lack of understanding! The referee was totally correct!
yea but a ref is still supposed to blow whistle if a player on any gets injured, yea it wasn't a foul, but the ref shouldve blown the whistle thats what the coach said, he never told him that it was a foul
What elbow to the head? that was just a shoulder of defence
The goalie didnt even foul him, the dude ran straight into the goalie and fell down.
Exactly. The goalie just stood his ground and he deserves applause, not a red card.
I love how the clueless woman said, "well none of the parents liked that". Does she think the rules are subject to parent approval?
Puckman637 I have the exception, my dads a referee
Maybe a yellow card on the slide tackle, but that's it. The only way the ref lost control was letting the parents dictate his calls.
lamontshandy yellow for that that was a leg breaker
I like how he charged the goalie and the guy watching is saying it was a “charging foul” the goalie had clear possession of the ball and buddy charged him and he bounced right off him. That coach and those spectators don’t know what there talking about.
Is this what American parents are like at football games 😂 not a clue what they are on about and wtf is a charging foul 🤣🤣
Yes, and basketball games too
My thoughts, having watched this multiple times, including one time watching frame by frame:
First clip: The ball was three yards away then the white player made the challenge, making no contact with the ball and running into the keeper. The keeper's elbow was not raised, nor did it make any movement towards the white player. This is a yellow card for white at the least, possibly red, due to the extreme lateness of the challenge. Had the keeper gone down, a professional referee would've likely shown red.
Second clip: It appears that the keeper made a movement towards the face of the opposing player with no contact. A yellow card would be correct here.
Third clip: White should be cautioned for a needless push on the yellow player after the ball is out of play.
On the foul, yellow makes contact with the ball almost simultaneously with white (possibly even just before), but comes through the back. The nature of the challenge was not deserving of a red. A yellow card could be given. The white player here clearly feigns injury. Almost immediately after the challenge, he attempts to kick out at the yellow player with his 'injured' foot and then flails it around, even kicking the ground, something he would clearly not do were he really injured.
The same white player from before comes from 15 yards out and pushes the yellow player for the second time in a situation where play is stopped. This should be a second caution or a straight red.
The ref really did lose control of that match. He allowed the parents to issue that red card.
You are so determined to get to the bottom of a pointless soccer game aren't you?
Jonah Janeway Yes, I am. Also, you should've ended that question with a question mark.
Its been fixed, thanks.
As a football player (european) i didnt like what i see how the white players do to get cheap benefits and the referee is ignorant and succumbing to the parents and white coach. this isnt football/soccer more like idiots trying to pick fights.
What puzzles me is how the ref didn't award a direct FK in the second clip.
Ya if someone ran at me full speed with no intention of stopping I would raise my arm to protect my body, even if you did say he raised his elbow too far, that's a natural reaction when someone is charging you that fast, that would be like head butting someone and then falling on the ground saying he should've moved his head so that I didn't hit mine so hard.
Idk how the ref calling a penalty on him would've magically healed his head
Ash playz why should he call a penalty when it was like 30 meters outside, but i see ur point. But what the manager wanted was to get the referee to void the goal cause of head injury something that is a good argument
it was actually a foul committed by the white player on the goalie so fuck them
im confused how was that a foul? he ran into his arm
How was the first one a foul? The white shirt charged at him and the gk didn't even push him
Exactly. If anything it was a free to the goalie. But play should have been stopped either way for head injury.
George, that was not a foul, simple as that. Also, on the yellow card to the goalie, that should have been yellow for the 2 forwards that provoked him. Coach and people's involvement does not help much. You all wanted to see this go down quickly.
True that the players who interfered with the goalies ability to distribute the ball should have been carded and an indirect free kick for the goalie, but that still doesn't excuse the goalies actions. I think yellow for all three players would have been warranted.
+Stephen Malacaria I disagree. I think the official got it right with a YC to the goalie. The players in white went in following the ball incase the goalie misplayed it. The goalie was not attempting to release the ball so how could they be interfering with his releasing the ball?
+BruinsChampions2011 because once the goalkeeper has the ball they have to give him space
The LoTG state that
"It is an offence for a player to prevent a goalkeeper from releasing the ball from his hands."
It says nothing about having to give the Goalkeeper space if he/she has the ball. In this case, they didn't prevent him from releasing the ball because there had been no attempt to release the ball that could be prevented. All the players were doing was making sure that he didn't make a mistake. No yellow to the players, YC to the GK is the correct decision.
This would never happen in English Sunday league. There would be a fight and the ref would send them off
Batman's Nan so true, can't wait for my game tommorow 😂😂😂
It happens all the time in sunday league. Even kids games have got out of control in the UK.
UTG OTIB mate Sunday league is the best at times 😂
Actually, the goalie wasn’t in the wrong, obviously shouldn’t have mauled him but in 99% of high school and lower leagues and even most pro leagues, you can’t run into the goalkeeper or the fouls on the runner
hahahahaha... that was no charge. Americans are so fragile.
Yeah.. because all you NON Americans don't flop in this pussy game of SOCCER either..(That's SARCASM because you probably won't understand that).. Don't generalize ALL Americans because of people you see playing this dumb ass game..
BlizzleCham
LOL... typical American reaction. First you resort to foul language because you have nothing else to say, then you belittle soccer. BlizzleCham, you are a such a hoot! Keep it up, cowboy!
BlizzleCham
Dude... you need to calm down. Gosh, so sensitive! I hope you're not butt hurt.
"Look at me, I'm BlizzleCham... I'm a 'Merican! My country sucks at soccer, but it's okay because we rule at the sports we invented! Gaaaah... soccer is for pussies anyway! hm.....donut"
Ricardo K. LMAO! You got the troll thing going on pretty well there!
BlizzleCham
Really? So does that mean you're butt hurt by what I said about 'Mericans?
First incident.This is called an "advantage" play.
Team white (A)Team yellow (B)
Team member of A charges at player B who is in control of the ball. There is NO intent of going for the ball, and you can see this because he never stuck a foot out or anything, all body. A could have been penalized actually for dangerous play. But what happened was B kept control and was allowed to keep control through the rest of the play. Ref did not stop play, because the action was moving away from the "injury" and 99% of the time in soccer... "injury" is a flop to try to drag penalties and milk the clock.
Coach needs to teach his players to ALWAYS play through the wistle!
Now, at 1:04 the ref was completely wrong. 2 offensive players deliberately obstructed goalie, who in most leagues has about 6 seconds to release the ball. Keeper raises arm, looks like posts player A, definitively NOT a penalty, or even a cardable one as it wasn't even assault. BOTH A players should have been at minimum, talked to, possibly carded at the END of the next play. This is LAW 12. When a goalkeeper has gained control of the ball, an opponent CANNOT challenge the goalkeeper in any way. Slow walking in front of the goalie, depending on how your game is going, could result in a consult or a YELLOW card following the end of play.
Reff also messed up because he stopped play in B possession in the goal box and then allowed B to continue with possession... It NEVER works that way, unless there is an obvious BAD injury, and game play is moving towards that player...
OY....
1:55 A player shoves player B in the back. Player B never faced A player. Ref let the play continue because he felt B was obstructing... Which is a redundant decision... Play A should have been carded for the shove, and then allowed to keep possession with the toss in.
2:12 ABSOLUTELY right on the ref. RED card for scissor kicking player, even though it didn't look, from the camera angle like it was malicious. Dangerous play is not tolerated, BUT physical contact is still encouraged in soccer. I would have also carded the A player who came in with the shove. 2 cards would have been far better than 1... (1 red for 12, 1 yellow for 10, 1 POSSIBLE yellow for the downed player. Think I saw a little bit of boot hooking)Carding everyone would have helped control the game, because 1 more, would result in an ejection so should, hypothetically, keep the play at bay for making stupid decisions... The ref could have controlled the game MUCH better by handing out candy cards....
whatever league this is... needs to NOT put 1 ref in for this age group on a field this size... I didn't once see a line judge....
Experience: I have been officiating soccer up to a collegiate level, for 12 years.
***** I'm noting your comments as well! Always good to have the most information to use! I will use them for Official development for sure
+AZ.LUNATIC_ I agree with all your decisions except the 1:55 one. I agree with the part that it was a foul he obviously shoved him even if he was standing in the way, however no matter what if you card a player, the opposing team gets possession of the ball with either an indirect or direct free kick.
+AZ.LUNATIC_ I largely agree. One clarifying point / question: you stated regarding the keeper/attacker collision "A could have been penalized for a dangerous play". Given the clear contact, that would be a charge in my book. Did I miss a point you were making, or did you "misspeak"? Cheers. (lowly Grade 8... ;) )
+Infintee Is that correct? "however no matter what if you card a player, the opposing team gets possession of the ball with either an indirect or direct free kick."
I'm a new ref and thought the advice was correct but I see you disagree. Any source for your claim in the laws?
Mark Gregory I must have misstated what I said. I meant it would not continue as a throw in, but rather a foul on the ground for a direct free kick. It was clearly a shove and that is a direct free kick worthy foul.
Its not the goalie's fault that kid was weak because he ran towards him
Referees don’t lose control, players do.
I'm white, but some of these parents are "too white" if ya know what I mean. They don't know soccer
Stuebe Doo football was invented by a white man.
U don't know football either since you are calling it "soccer"....
The game is called Football & the colour of your skin makes no difference!
What a pathetic moron & from what I have read, you talk a good game but unfortunately you are full of shit lol
It strange how you have to abuse & everyone you engage with...we can't all be wrong in our opinion of you..maybe you should learn to have a conversation & argue your corner, rather than shouting & screaming abuse, when someone has a different view point!
from my perspective the goalie didnt make that foul because the player in the white charged him the goalkeeper was just the stronger player
Except the Goalkeeper elbowed him in the head. Which should have been a red card for violent conduct.
Later when he the caution the goalkeeper he should’ve restarted with a penalty kick not a drop ball.
Shocking foul throw not spotted also.
statto74 actually he didn’t take his arm up as it was already up if the player would have gone for the ball he wouldn’t have been injured. And yes you’re right you can’t hit after another player but it wouldn’t have been a penalty because there were no contact at all. The ref didn’t loose control he just didn’t see everything, yes a ref does need special training but at this stage he hasn’t received professional training and isn’t even close to becoming a pro ref.
statto74 no arms raised 😆
0:50 Coach is an absolute bellend ref should get him sent off
+Dom Ryan At this level, unless things have changed since I hung it up about 6 years ago, you can not send off a non-player. If the match becomes unworkable due to the actions of a coach, the only option would be to suspend the match until they are under control, or terminate the match at that point. I've suspended twice, and it brought about the desired behavior quickly in both cases.
+yvwic50 in recent years, you are now allowed to dismiss the coach. Happened after the 2012 season, I believe. No reason to punish the players for the coaches behavior.
ParodyKing124 Thanks, I haven't recertified in about 7 years now, and I was wondering if this had been addressed. It would have made life easier on a few occasions- not necessarily to use it, but to have the coach know that they faced this consequence if necessary.
if someones running at you like that of course your gonna lift your arm up to protect yourself
America + football = Never should have happened
Tomos Edney your a bitch dude u are rude I play football and I am American and I love it and I am really good at it so shut tf up
Onyx lol
@@emmaroach9344 Americans can't play football so you can't be good.
@@cooperw685 No. The real name is football.
@@cooperw685 Nope. The official name is football. Only the americans, who can't play football, name it soccer.
Sorry but as a former goalie who got his butt handed to him in collisions, this goalie did nothing wrong, he had 1st contact with the ball and he DID nor forcefully try to drive it into the other player, the fact that he ran over him means nothing, he who has the E=mc2 rules
Isn't it amazing how everyone can do the ref's job better than he can, but no one volunteers to actually do it.
From experience, I can tell you that there is definitely a underlying touch of xenophobia/racism in those games...
“You have the whistle”
I have the right too throw you off my soccer field
In England we just get on with it👍🏼
Exactly
Goalkeeper with clear possession of the ball, smaller dude charges him and gets the worst of it. If there's any foul to be called, it's on the smaller dude. It's hard to be an official at youth sports, I can tell you that much!
the first one is not a Foul at all the striker was running full speed at a human wall he wasn't playing the ball he was trying to hurt the goalkeeper but it backfired at 1:05 it shouldn't of been a yellow but a warning if you look closely the keeper did try to slap the players but they were provoking him and finally on the throw in the white player did push number 12 on the dead ball he should of earned a yellow card and when number 12 went in for the tackle that was a great call and a deserving red card he came from behind always will be a redcard and when the white player pushed him while his foot was tangled that should have been a yellow card therefore the title is misleading and the ref had total control of the game with a few mistakes
You'd try to slap them too if they kept trying to run into you. He's only human.
You could have given a Red card to the first incident on the striker for excessive force. If the goalie was of equal size of the white player, that goalie would have sent flying.
- On the two white attackers getting into the space of the goalie when he had the ball, they are trying to intimidate the goalie and should have been given a Yellow Card. What's curious to me is since the referee stopped the game for what the goalie did (I suspect he gave him a Yellow for Unsporting Behavior), then that foul occurred inside the box and should be a free kick to the white team. I wonder how he restarted play? I can't see what the goalie did too clearly but I would assume by your comments he tried to slap them. If so, that is a Striking and the player should receive a Red card and be sent off and White team should have a Penalty Kick.
- On the red card at the end - I agree with the call. However, the play shouldn't have even occurred. If the referee had noticed the push by the White player on that Yellow player on the sidelines just before the thrown in, the Yellow player probably would not have retaliated. He should have given a Yellow/Caution to the White player that threw the ball in. It would have helped to diffuse the situation by allowing tempers to calm down while he documented the incident.
it ws foul throw for the throwing foul
A Vegetarian ran into a Carnivore at 0:01 😂🤣😅 No Foul. Emotionally weak parents lost their minds.
Honestly, he ran into him
😂😂😂 kid ran right into that one! No fault play here.
wow really?
this is what you call losing control over a match?
just because he didn't give the cards the way u wanted?
no wonder America is so far behind when it comes to football
I know. I want to move to europe
jamaie nelson i get you man but honestly In america you'll probably have a better chance of being scouted than in Europe !
the white team ran up and stood in front of him, they are not innocent.
“You have to live with that” lmao how will he ever sleep at night knowing he made a “bad call” 😂
😂😂😂
I disagree with the complaints in the published by George Langevin Productions. The ref made a decision on a 50/50 call and decided to make a no call. He tried to let them play and the game got more intense and to the refs credit, he started giving out cards. The kids and the coaches have more control over player conduct. The referree does the best he can and was assigned to that game for good reason.
Now, for all of the refs out there, let's do a quick assessment. First, when play is stopped for an injury, and the coach is invited onto the pitch to tend to his player, the REFEREE should get the ___ away from the injured player. Guys, it looks terrible to have you and the coach standing next to each other while he is yelling at you. After you have stopped play and beckoned the coach onto the field, then jog away from the injured player and the coach. Watch and observe and if the coach wants to make a beef, let him look foolish flaying his arms and shouting at you 30 yards away. If he continues to create a distraction, send the coach off.
Second, during play and when long balls are kicked, then quickly move toward the landing spot so that you can ''be there' before any contact. When the 'keeper' got a card, the referee had to sprint 30+ yards and was completely out of the frame. With an intense game being played, the referee needs to be physically fit to be alert to problems and let his presence felt by the ''bandits'' on the field. More trouble can be eliminated by keeping up with the level of play instead of standing stationary.
+Jerry Sinclair As a fellow referee, this is pretty much spot on. Well said.
I personally don't tolerate a coach who I summon onto the field to tend to an injury protesting anything. No matter where I am standing, if the coach starts trying to protest and ignoring the injured player, I am, at a minimum, telling the coach (I skip ask) that he is on the field for one reason only and I will dismiss him if he continues.
BruinsChampions2011
I am just quoting the guidelines from an assessors point of view. If an official wants to stand next to an injured player and angry coach - that is asking for trouble. It is far better to see a silly coach screaming at you and you cannot hear him because he is so far away. Players and fans see this nonsensical tirade from a coach and they will not want to be a part of his silly tirade. It is just a suggestion - not a mandate to move away. If you think it is better to hang around an injured player and have a coach start barking at you in close range, then go for it. I for one would rather be far away so I have many witness including two AR that can attest to how unprofessional he is. If he is having a heated conversation next to me, then there is no to hear what he is saying. No biggy, but staying away from an inured player during dead time is my preference.
I personally just use the time to start getting myself set up for the next play. If that is near the situation, then I may move slightly away, but I am not going to go out of my way to move away. I was more stating that IMO, coaches protesting while on the field shouldn't be tolerated whatsoever
As an official of 20+ years, I don't disagree with anything stated here. :)
thats nothing you should see english sunday league football
Hackney Marshes.
The white team were way over the top and dramatic. I thought the yellows were pretty decent considering!
that not even a foul the gollie straight bodiesd that kid that was a clean ass play
arse*
That was not a goalie foul. What a bunch of know nothing sissies..... get out of contact sports ASAP please.
Wtf is a charging foul
I think they have gotten the rules of basketball and soccer mixed up.
In Law 12 of the Laws of the Game, charging an opponent is punishable by a direct free kick.
*CLEARLY NO FOUL, The kid in white ran towards the GOALIE who was protecting himself.
The kid in white clearly crashed towards his shoulders.
The ref could Have STOPPED THE GAME AND GIVE THE player IMMEDIATELY attention due to a serious injury.
NO FOUL but game should’ve been STOPPED.
He didn’t even try to get the ball, he wanted to run into a brick wall xD No foul
It was defo no foul but ref should stop if there's a head injury
First things first: There is NO SUCH THING as a charging foul in this sport. Probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard. First off, the original play on the ball at 0:01 is not even close to a foul on the keeper. The attacking player was out of control and the keeper didn't do anything wrong. Beyond that as an official, I would've sent the coach after his outburst. Secondly, when the goalie slapped the kid in the head, that doesn't warrant a send off what so ever. That is simply unsporting behavior which is punishable with a caution but not a send off. Third, ANY player that makes contact with the official shall be awarded a caution. This isn't MLS, you don't have that right. Fourth, the tackle by the yellow team at 2:06 is a definite send off as it is from behind and it was a retaliation. The shove after that same tackle was worthy of a caution. As for the parents, you all need to learn the laws of the game before you try and give your scholarly input. Asking for a red card after every little push and shove makes you sound ridiculously uneducated. To the owner of this video, don't put in the description that play should've been stopped because it should not have been. Advantage to the team that was fouled shouldn't be taken unless there is to be a caution/ejection.
Matt, Law 12 says "A direct free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a player commits any of the following seven offences in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force: charges an opponent."
I'm not sure to which part of the comment you are referring to but if there is a 'send-off offense', you may play advantage if possible, so long as it isn't endangering any player or unless there is an immediate need for medical attention. I learned that one on a test I had a few years ago. Before that, I would've stopped it on a dime.
Matt Nieland
First off you are wrong, Matt. There is clearly a law against charging a player with careless, reckless or using excessive force. ... Which the player in WHITE did.
I support this referee. Only thing I would've done differently is sent the coach home.
That definitely wasn't a foul the player was running full speed and ran into the goalie the keeper he's probably super built because he didn't even budge
That was a foul on white team player. He just picked to make that challenge on the wrong player
1:13 Red card??? WTF?
Even yellow card was so ridiculous, the keeper has every right in that area to protect himself, even the ref. must protect the keeper as well. So yellow cards must go to the opponents instead!
So the keeper should be able to throw a punch at the other players in the name of protecting himself? Even when the opposing players present no threat?
Andy Jayroe Punch? You call that very soft slap a punch. C'mon don't be sissy this is Football dude!
A punch is a punch. You do't classify it as good left jab or soft sissy punch. If he even takes a swipe at another player, that is an attempt and should be punished appropriately.
Andy Jayroe They ran into his face and obviously had been the entire match. You just don't get to fuck with keepers like that, and those strikers doing it are lucky they're in the states. They'd get some tribal justice otherwise.
To the goalie? Are you color-blind? That *was* a yellow card. He swatted at the other players because they must have said something to him, or crowded him for longer than necessary.
It wasn't a foul, but the ref should have stopped the game as it was a head injury. You all have to watch more soccer
Obvious goal scoring opportunity though
The goalie had possession. It was a foul on the player without the ball. You can't just run into the player with the ball and call for a foul. Bad call by the ref, should have called a penalty on the striker.
what? why penalty`?
+Matthew Hoffman Not really. yellow profited off a defensive error. Game should definitely been stopped with a drop ball as the restart.
YaGunnersYa you mean football
This video is just ignorant to anybody who knows the sport well..
+NG A
I do not know the sport well, but it seemed to me that the white team was in the wrong most of the time here. On the first play, the white player ran into the goalie. On the second play, the white players were blocking the goalie from continuing play. Only on the third play did I see the yellow team commit what I thought should be a foul, but even that seemed like it should have been a minor foul - akin to a personal foul in basketball, not intentional or unsportsmanlike.
White teams fans seem like a bunch of crybabies.
But, like I said, I do not know the sport that well.
+cazinger The first play was a foul on the white player for a ridiculous tackle. The 2nd play the white players were provoking the goalie (the white players are required to give the goalie space after he gains possession like that but it was too soon for the ref to call a foul on them) and the goalie gave in so he got a yellow card for harmfully touching the white player. at 1:56 more provoking from the white team.. at 2:04 foul on the yellow player (possibly already on his first yellow card) didn't seem like a red to me but the ref might have been pressured by his surroundings to give it. Also the player at 2:09 should have at least received a yellow for this behavior but idk why the ref felt like the yellow players were in the wrong that's why i think he was influenced by the stupid coach/parents
Don’t you just love parents who think they know everything? My husband was a referee for years. He was a referee coordinator. No way would he put up with this. Not for one second. That parent would have been asked to leave.
only team really playing dirty is the team in white. The goalie hit was nothing more then him putting hands up to protect himself. Then they intentionally surround the goalie and somehow the goalie gets a card. Then the red card on the end is simply a yellow card, he just missed his tackle, might have been intentional after all the stuff the ref let the white team get away with.
+Kartracer6 This was all handled quite well by the referee. However, the tackle at 2:00 was 100% a sending off offense...no doubt about this. It was clearly excessive in force and it was retaliatory. That young man should've likely seen an additional suspension with that.
would that be a penalty shot at 1:05 he got a yellow card for it.
Actually, white should've gotten a penalty kick for the keeper's attempt to strike his opponents. Even if it had been strictly a misconduct issue, the referee still would've been wrong for not giving white an IFK.
Depends on the yellow card. This card was not given while the ball was not in play. If any of the 10 fouls that result in a direct kick was the reason for the yellow, it would be a PK.
2:01 foul throw
Only problem I have with this is that he did not caution to two white players who crowded the keeper and he did not caution the white player who shoved the yellow kid in the back
Haha! No foul by the goalie at the beginning. The opposing player ran into the goalie while the goalie was in normal stride. Good job ref! As a coach , I frequently find parents are not familiar with the rules.