Since I'm sticking with my D4s for now I'm thinking D6 in a year or two. Once you've used a professional camera might as well stay with one. And mirrorless doesn't do anything for my landscape and wildlife for the money..
It's nice to hear that experience from you. True, D4 is a great camera, and D6 may have more functionality and capabilities. I don't know mirrorless doesn't as good as dslr in landscape and wildlife.
Nice video. I'm hesiting between d780 and d850(i have an opportunity to get a d850 with just 200$ more than the d780 that s why i hésitate) can you tell me on this year for wich one should i get? For wesding portrait and low light event. Thank you
@robertodi9245 If you have an extra budget and memory size, go for D850 because of price and image resolution (46mp), D780 only 25mp, but almost the same because it has a bit modern tech expeed 6 rather than expeed 5 for D850.
I'm not a Nikon shooter. However, if offered a choice to select one from D850 and D6, I would go for the latter. The reasons are clear. D6 can do all. But D850 won't be a good low-light performer due to its pixel density. The D6 with its bigger pixels will certainly perform far better. The other features clearly speak for themselves. Resolutions above 30mp on a full frame sensor is pure gimmick, not a useful feature.
@@geralkay3012 being a pure hobbyist Canon shooter, I'm in love with older reliable bodies. Use 1D Mark IV, 5D Mark III & 7D for wildlife photography. They never let me down and don't miss anything that I need. For example, 40fps of R1 is unnecessary for my needs. 120fps of Sony A9III is a great real-life joke. However, some people will fall for it and, that's how manufacturers earn their bread.😁
@@geralkay3012 being a pure hobbyist Canon shooter, I'm in love with older reliable bodies. Use 1D Mark IV, 5D Mark III & 7D for wildlife photography. They never let me down and don't miss anything that I need. For example, 40fps of R1 is unnecessary for my needs. 120fps of Sony A9III is a great real-life joke. However, some people will fall for it and, that's how manufacturers earn their bread.😁
Since I'm sticking with my D4s for now I'm thinking D6 in a year or two. Once you've used a professional camera might as well stay with one. And mirrorless doesn't do anything for my landscape and wildlife for the money..
It's nice to hear that experience from you. True, D4 is a great camera, and D6 may have more functionality and capabilities. I don't know mirrorless doesn't as good as dslr in landscape and wildlife.
Nice video.
I'm hesiting between d780 and d850(i have an opportunity to get a d850 with just 200$ more than the d780 that s why i hésitate) can you tell me on this year for wich one should i get? For wesding portrait and low light event.
Thank you
@robertodi9245 If you have an extra budget and memory size, go for D850 because of price and image resolution (46mp), D780 only 25mp, but almost the same because it has a bit modern tech expeed 6 rather than expeed 5 for D850.
@@geralkay3012 thank you for your answer
Convincing enough for me to buy a second D850 body for my studio work. Shame about the computer voice :-(
D850 is a superb camera top line DSLR. You'll never regret it.
Prefer D750, better @ higher iso handling & smaller body... inexpensive.
@@Stop-All-War True. D750 is a great choice. I recommend it.
I'm not a Nikon shooter. However, if offered a choice to select one from D850 and D6, I would go for the latter.
The reasons are clear. D6 can do all. But D850 won't be a good low-light performer due to its pixel density. The D6 with its bigger pixels will certainly perform far better. The other features clearly speak for themselves.
Resolutions above 30mp on a full frame sensor is pure gimmick, not a useful feature.
I'll go for D6 too for low light because newer sensor. But, D850 won't disappoint for a long run.
@@geralkay3012 being a pure hobbyist Canon shooter, I'm in love with older reliable bodies. Use 1D Mark IV, 5D Mark III & 7D for wildlife photography. They never let me down and don't miss anything that I need.
For example, 40fps of R1 is unnecessary for my needs. 120fps of Sony A9III is a great real-life joke. However, some people will fall for it and, that's how manufacturers earn their bread.😁
@@geralkay3012 being a pure hobbyist Canon shooter, I'm in love with older reliable bodies. Use 1D Mark IV, 5D Mark III & 7D for wildlife photography. They never let me down and don't miss anything that I need.
For example, 40fps of R1 is unnecessary for my needs. 120fps of Sony A9III is a great real-life joke. However, some people will fall for it and, that's how manufacturers earn their bread.😁
That Canon cameras are good, too. Sony A9III is a real deal joke XD.