Fascinating. I never knew Steiner wrote about Stirner and came to the same conclusion I did. But, then, there is still ambivalence and a respect for their different projects in the way I see it, because I feel closer to Nietzsche, as a spiritual empath or heyoka. While Nietzsche believed he was aiming for the self (himself) but this self (his-self) is characterized by a "going out", - paradoxically, a going inward, - or an exploratory zeal, bordering on hubris, to see from every perspective, and simultaneously to affirm and undermine every perspective, at once. So, even if he sometimes had this ideal (and his impeccably self-possessed ubermensch looks exactly like Max Stirner), ultimately, he ends by celebrating the mad adventure and his oneness with the whole. Stirner knew himself as The One who goes over the bridge; and remains Himself, on either side: Nietzsche discovered himself as The Bridge To Nowhere, and a child-artist, creating sand-kingdoms on the shores of time. Steiner, perhaps, envisioned a kind of Magician, where the I/Not-I are alchemically blended into one, I-In-I movement.
@1:04:00 Steiner like someone like Jordan Hall had the Christ experience because the descent into matter is the path inward. Meaning to follow the Christ as an existential experience not propositional or axiomatic is to enter into physical matter more and more. What Steiner would call death forces. This is unlike the idealists he adored. He knew as Owen Barfield says there must be a coming of age of those thinkers. Great chat
Interestingly Steiner's Stirner starts to sound a bit like we're doubling back to Fichte. Arriving at a unifying world spirit through the self-positing of the being
GUYS IF YOU DONT GOT A DEMON LIVING IN YOUR RIGHT EYE THEN IM A FRIEND AND MY WILL IS GOOD AND IF YOU DO THEN CONTINUE PLAYING YOUR PART IN MY HISTORY.
Steiner against Capitalism. First you must understand the myth of Capitalism. Coz you and me aint never witnessed such a thing. Shit nobody in the modern world
Really excited for this one
Fascinating. I never knew Steiner wrote about Stirner and came to the same conclusion I did. But, then, there is still ambivalence and a respect for their different projects in the way I see it, because I feel closer to Nietzsche, as a spiritual empath or heyoka. While Nietzsche believed he was aiming for the self (himself) but this self (his-self) is characterized by a "going out", - paradoxically, a going inward, - or an exploratory zeal, bordering on hubris, to see from every perspective, and simultaneously to affirm and undermine every perspective, at once. So, even if he sometimes had this ideal (and his impeccably self-possessed ubermensch looks exactly like Max Stirner), ultimately, he ends by celebrating the mad adventure and his oneness with the whole. Stirner knew himself as The One who goes over the bridge; and remains Himself, on either side: Nietzsche discovered himself as The Bridge To Nowhere, and a child-artist, creating sand-kingdoms on the shores of time. Steiner, perhaps, envisioned a kind of Magician, where the I/Not-I are alchemically blended into one, I-In-I movement.
I'll be taking notes!
BRILLIANT YOU'VE OUTDONE YOURSELF YET AGAIN James!! A TOUR DE FORCE!!A CROWNING ACHIEVEMENT!! FlooDING THE PATREON AS I TYPE!! BRAVO JAMES BRAVO
flooding not founding sorry
@@fuanon3441 you can edit if you click on the three vertical dots, to the right of your comment
@@TheRealValus a gentleman and a scholar ty sir
BRAVO! ENCORE! ENCORE!!!!
@@fuanon3441 Keep it in your trousers.
Holy is the "I", -
The Inner Identity, shared alike by all;
for everyone is known, each to oneself, as "I".
New age mysticism at its finest.
I feel like my teenage intrests and young adult intrests are colliding.
Which is which?
I think it was Goethe who defined
genius as perpetual adolescence.
*thoughtful noises*
@1:04:00 Steiner like someone like Jordan Hall had the Christ experience because the descent into matter is the path inward. Meaning to follow the Christ as an existential experience not propositional or axiomatic is to enter into physical matter more and more. What Steiner would call death forces. This is unlike the idealists he adored. He knew as Owen Barfield says there must be a coming of age of those thinkers. Great chat
Interestingly Steiner's Stirner starts to sound a bit like we're doubling back to Fichte. Arriving at a unifying world spirit through the self-positing of the being
Holy is the "I", -
The Inner Identity, shared alike by all;
for everyone is known, each to oneself, as "I".
GUYS IF YOU DONT GOT A DEMON LIVING IN YOUR RIGHT EYE THEN IM A FRIEND AND MY WILL IS GOOD AND IF YOU DO THEN CONTINUE PLAYING YOUR PART IN MY HISTORY.
Are you schizophrenic?
Count me in brother. What should I do?
Anarchists vying for power? Yeah, no 😂
"Libertarians: Diligently Plotting
To Take Over The World, And
Leave You Alone." 😅
Steiner against Capitalism.
First you must understand the myth of Capitalism. Coz you and me aint never witnessed such a thing.
Shit nobody in the modern world
its a "Spook," as Stirner said, a straw man, it has never existed and never will, as you both said
"Capitalism" is just
another word for consent,
but in the economic sphere.