Spiral Dynamics and the Divine Feminine
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
- Click the link below to support The Diamond Net on Patreon in exchange for rewards:
/ thediamondnet
This video is all about Spiral Dynamics and its relationship to human evolution and the repression and integration of the Divine Feminine. I also talk about some solutions for moving ourselves and our societies forward on the spiral, so that we can collectively shift more toward a society that is whole and has both the Divine Feminine and Divine Masculine integrated.
Spiral Dynamics is a model of human development on the societal and individual level which was created by Clare Graves. There are many different colors that represent the stages of human development including; Beige, Purple, Red, Blue, Orange, Yellow, and Turquoise. I talk about every stage in the video except Turquoise.
I originally found out about Spiral Dynamics from Actualized.org, which is where I've gleaned much of the basis for information that I'm sharing.
If you want a more a in depth look at the Spiral Dynamics model, Leo from Actualized has a ton of videos on the topic. Here is the link to his channel:
/ actualizedorg
I hope you enjoy the video! :)
🖤❤🧡💛💚💙💜🖤 Holy heck .... I've watched a fair few of your videos over the last week... I'm overwhelmed with information.... I'd already started taking steps on my shadow work and seriously.... your deliverance is INSANELY beautiful!.....
I know I'm late to this particular party 😂🤣
But ohhhhhhh man.... did this hit home...
I've been at battle with the divine feminine for years.... now I just want a cuddle.... and I've got ALOTTA work to do before I feel myself worthy.... but that's my shadow to squash 😋🙏
🖤❤🧡💛💚💙💜🖤 your content. ... faaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrr out!👽👽🖤❤🧡💛💚💙💜🖤
If you dont integrate Red you become a doormat, its an extremely important stage when its healthy.
instablaster.
One of your most relevant videos from my current perspective of
One World One Love.
That's a really interesting system. I might have used slightly different colors to say the same thing, but I think ultimately the different phases are heading toward a more centered integration, so there probably isn't really anything to extrapolate to beyond "yellow." Each phase before that has a sort of resistance either against the group or the individual, but to me "yellow" sounds like that space where there's no longer any resistance, no longer any need to fight against yourself or your surroundings/community.
There's self-transcendence beyond yellow - compare the final version of maslow's hierarchy. In yellow, you get a self-actualizing, more and more integrated individual. In the next phase the individual 'reaches out' again to cooperate with other to facilitate healing of everything, or rather goes beyond to see themselves as one with the world.
This si so wise and relevant!
Female version of Actualized.org
There is a lot more blue imitating green than many think, especially with younger people
Novel & interesting theory. Much in synch with hindu yugas, mayan baktuns & zodiacal time precessions; i.e. yellow shift matches the age of aquarius! Let us all move into it! Best regards from Cancún. CM.
For further immersion into these subjects, apply to reading S.J. Salvador Freixedo's: Teovnilogía (Theoufology) & La Granja Humana (The Human Farm)!
A magnificent knowledge expansion, towards factual evidence, regarding other advanced intelligences!
An interaction between cosmic & everlasting civilizations!?
Best wishes from Cancún, México. 😉
Nice video 👈 I just read a book about spiral Dynamics it's a good theme
Thank you! :) I think it's a really interesting system too.
Its not just that higher stages are better, often we can tape into the kinds of logic used in higher states well before we express them as our values systems
Making sure we can good foundations, example, dont mimic effective behaviours that make someone else miscible.. this will figuratively suck the best of purple and red right out of you can be a helpful start to raising your consciousness
This was invaluable to me, thanks so much for the hard work. Appreciate it.
What are you're thoughts on the kabbalah (tree of life)? Each sefirot on the kabbalah represents the state in which the mind resides. It resembles the spiral dynamic in a way. I find that within every theory there are thousands of others explaining the same thing. Anyways, I love your videos you hold so much knowledge and present it excellently.
im in yellow.... makes sense why i feel crucial to the planet, but not in a way that feeds any sense of self importance in a vain sense.
Where can I find information about your educational background. (Big fan of CG Jung.)
I don't have a formal educational background in psychology. Everything that I know about Jungian Psychology or psychology in general has come from experience, personal insights, and independent research. As far as formal education goes, I have a bachelor's degree in Fine Art, another bachelor's degree in Art Education (k-12), and minor in Art History.
Thank you. In my opinion, you present the material very well. I just discovered your channel and will be looking over older posts and look forward to newer ones. Cheers.
Just wondering. Is there anything like a divine masculine?
The Divine Masculine exists too, and much of it is still beneath the surface too. I am going to make a video about it in the future. We don't have as deep of a problem with it in our societies as we do with the Divine Feminine. But we do have what I call a 'reactionary' repression of the Divine Masculine. Ultimately, because the Divine Feminine has been repressed the Shadow Masculine comes up in its steed. So, because many have come to associate the Masculine in general with the Shadow Masculine, there is a reactionary repression.
The Diamond Net thank you so much for the reply. I have never heard of divine and masculine used together. It seems in the era we live in any appreciation of masculine characters is a strict no no. I have found your channel like a breath of fresh air ......really..because you present your videos in a very honest straightforward and stoic way .........there is no bull and no manipulative charm. I see very few women interact that way especially if they are good looking. Most gorgeous women seem to be in their own world of entitlement . I hope you don't take that in the wrong way. Notice that I did call you good looking. I have just discovered your work a few days back and have subscribed . going through your videos one by one. You are really good in presenting your ideas in front of the camera. The videos on ego integration and ego transgression were amazing. Unfortunately only regular meditators will be able actually grasp the depth of what you have said in those videos. I'm glad I found your work . wish you well ma'am. Deep gratitude. Tc.
jaguarfocus how is this comment not bigoted? The same "manipulative" nature can be applied to men, but you choose to describe the opposite gender with this terminology.
Would you talk about the divine masculine, please?
I can put it on my list of videos to record, for sure.
Interesting!
Thank you! :)
You seem interested in Carl Yung. What are your honest thoughts on Dr. Jordan Peterson?
I love Carl Jung's work, but I'm not a fan of Jordan Peterson... to put it lightly. I see him as using Jung's work and his other talking points/buzz words to try to plant the seeds for re-establishing old social orders, essentially trying to go backward in human evolution. I see him primarily as a resister of the Divine Feminine, and an effective one at that. And my guess is that it's on purpose and that he knows exactly what he's doing because of his esoteric knowledge.
But he's very crafty not to say too much and makes himself difficult to pin down in terms of what he's in favor of. That way he gets plausible deniability, and when he brings up controversial ideas in debate or conversation he simply looks like an open-minded, free-thinking philosopher-type who is just mulling over all the different possibilities or perhaps just playing Devil's Advocate. But I'm certain that he knows that many within his audience are already connecting the dots in a rather regressive way.
The unfortunate thing is that he is excellent at appealing to Conservatives, Moderates, and Liberals alike because he has a level-headed and intellectual way of talking and speaking, and his self-help advice is otherwise solid. He basically knows all the right words to say. So, his rhetoric goes down smooth.
And I've never seen him debate against someone who could actually join him in the esoteric/Jungian paradigm to truly challenge his ideas. So, all his debaters look stupid because they brought knives to a gun fight, which lends him even more credibility.
So, I see him as a bit of a wolf in sheep's clothing. That said, I'm sure he thinks he's saving "Western Civilization" and doing a great thing.
But if my experiences, insights, and research are any indicator of what's true, the direction he's trying to lead people in will be (at best) a waste precious time or (at worst) will add gasoline to the dumpster fire that is the continued shift toward terrible things that I see society move closer and closer to.
The Diamond Net I agree, there's been a rise in pseudo intellectual "philosophers." He associates feminity with chaos, claims secular moral people are playing out a "Judea Christian" morality, and fundamentally misunderstands post modernism.
He also blames everything on the "neo Marxists" and "gang of nihilists." And creates this false narrative that men are "oppressed" in society, and claims "feminity" is the problem in society. Which is an unbelievably superficial analysis, because virtually all the genocides, and massive crimes against humanity are predicated in toxic "masculinity".
This desire for control, and selfish hierarchical domination has fundamentally corrupted civilization. That does not mean women are superior to men, however it does mean that masculinity is objectively inferior to feminine values.
I agree with everything you've said except for the very last line about masculinity being inferior to feminine values. Both are honestly necessary and equal in their necessity. That said, in the current era the feminine should be prioritized, because it is the principle that is being repressed. It is what society sorely needs. And unfortunately, pseudo-intellectuals like Jordan Peterson are using their esoteric knowledge to fortify the barrier to the repression of the feminine principle.
Curious if you still feel the same about JP?
What interview(s) or work lead to your opinion of him.
I’m interested to understand what im missing…
You are making a mistake with regards to collectivism being a positive thing: all the atrocities in history were due to collectivism. From nazism, fascism to socialism and communism, all have cost the lives of millions of people. Socialism and communism - which aimed at making society equal - killed and starved around 100 million people throughout history and counting (Venezuela).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes
Individualistic ideals like democracies are environments where humans thrive, generate ideas together and create innovative technologies for the benefit of society.
Also, I find that 'green people' are extremely hateful, intolerant and sometimes violent.
Most of those people that I meet are anti-semitic, anti-asian, anti 'straight white male' and anti older people. They silence people from having conversation at threat of losing their job or even getting arrested. Its can be scary sometimes talking to them..
This relates in no way to what I was saying. I was saying that we as individuals should be focused globally instead of locally, so that we aren't just advocating for our individual societies but for the Earth, its creatures, and humanity as a whole. So, don't think that I'm advocating for some one world government or something like that. Also, half the social structures in Spiral Dynamics have its focus on the collective. They are not inherently bad phases. It's just the way human nature develops according to this model.
Ok, but the examples you gave in your talk that green people are people who focus on social issues like 'minority groups or women'. Those same people that who really look out for minority groups and women, necessarily hate minority groups that are 'doing better' such as Jews, Indians, Chinese, Korean as well as 'straight white males'. It is not productive to society, in this context to love some collectives in society, but hate other collectives.
If you are suggesting that green people are the final stage of evolution and those are largely people on the left side of the political spectrum, you might be disappointed as there will always be people on the right side of the spectrum.
Conservatives are not 'less evolved' by trying to keep social norms in place, because a lot of those social norms have kept our society alive and somewhat harmonious.
How can you tell me that 'getting back to nature' and being 'green people' will not cause our society to break into pieces and lead us back to a more primitive time?
@@JonathanLevinTKYEach stage builds on top of each other, it's not either or. A lot of the stage green people you see today have not integrated the positive aspects of stage orange. In the ideal situation you would integrate the positive aspects from each stage and then move on to the next stage.
Jonathon this stuff is not inherint or essential to stage green. It is really about love and a focus on people rather than greed or achievement. Stage green also includes hippies, recylcling, inclusivity, focusing on emotions and listening to people's feelings, volunteering, and many other peaceful loving and non hateful things
A tip on your speech delivery. You do a good job overall at avoiding the very problematic overuse of "ummm" and "like." However you do overuse "ya know" as a filler phrase. Also, I noticed the abuse of the less obvious word "basically" as an unnecessary filler at the 24:00 minute mark for awhile.
"Oh look at me, I'm in the yellow phase above all those other phases. No I make no value judgment, everyone is just as good, but I'm in the top of the ladder. All phases are equal, but some phases are more equal than others ".
If I were you, I would take a look in the shadow of this theory of yours. How self serving it is.
Here's a video dedicated to yellow. It's a good watch, if you have the time :)
ruclips.net/video/w0d1TsOcbQs/видео.html
I never said that I'm in Yellow. And personally, I'm not super interested in it as a model for individual human development, as a person can exist in many stages at once. That said, I think it's an incredibly compelling system for understanding how societies develop.
In this case I shall simply explain why that is bollocks. The first phase never existed in humans. We are social animals and have evolved from social animals, the last time we were interested in our own survival and not that of others, we were rats.
The Neanderthaler already practiced funeral, indicating a concern for others and spirituality, would that be purple?
At the same time, chimpanzees already live in a male dominated society, is that red? But wait a moment, researcher have observed that the warlord kind of leader don't last very much. Only the ones that value friendship can establish long lasting realm. So they just skipped blue and went direct to orange.
Also did you knew we have poems of the late middle ages complaining about the environmental problems. Actually one of the reason for the end of the middle ages was the environmental limitations given the growing population. Green is absolutely nothing new, Nature has always been valued for more romantic types. What we have now is that we are no longer constantly worrying not to starve to death, so we have time for a small clean up.
Do you see the problem, this theory has absolutely no bases in actual history. It is just perceived history by our bias popular understanding. It is also extremely suspicious that we were stuck in lower phases for hundreds of years and now we are at full speed to progress.
The whole theory is based in this progressivist idea that history moves up. Eugenics and the prohibition of drugs were progressive ideals once, look at what happened.
But the worse is the end. Promoting social change based in a "compelling" Ideology. Haven't we learned not to do that after the XX century? No, we haven't, because no one knows anything of history.
I have questions about the theory as well. But you should try reading a book on spiral dynamics before making such a harsh criticism after one video.
First, it's not like there haven't been green, yellow. or even turquoise people in history before. AFAIK, even Buddha was turquoise.
Second, green has little to do with the environment, or progressive politics. These things tend to manifest themselves as a result of embracing your feminine side, which balances out the masculine. This is something that orange (esp. orange males) know very little about. Trying to understand green without this feminine energy is like trying to get a boner without any testosterone. Or a man reading a romance novel, ya know? You might get to a point where you understand things logically, but you'll never really 'get' it.
Also, you're right that progressivism has serious limitations, which is why yellow exists :) Yellow isn't progressive, but is all about neutrality - setting aside your biases to see things as they really are.
Edit: Stage turquoise video is up :)
ruclips.net/video/ci1s0ztLYwc/видео.html