Download iOS Military Summary Map: itunes.apple.com/app/id6477433117 THE MAP: dev.militarysummary.com Store: www.militarysummary.store/ Google doc: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18WfJv1_DOlFOzvjh6iT1N8ltDvaCeWu1cPK_eaHKCR4/edit?usp=sharing Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-1613003 Telegram channel: t.me/militarysummary Twitter: twitter.com/MilitarySummary Email: military.summary.info@gmail.com Patreon: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true Help the channel: www.donationalerts.com/r/military_summary Help the channel: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true
The Sarmat is an ICBM. Russia had ICBMS in Service for decades and nobody doubts their ability to deliver nuclear warheads to any point in the world. Moscow doesn´t need to demonstrate that by shooting a maneuverable hypersonic Avantgard vehicle into US territory with just a payload of concrete. Furthermore, the Sarmat missile has already been adopted into regular military service last year, which means that the testing phase was already over and the tests were successful. So whatever went boom on that test pad was most likely not a Sarmat missile, but who knows what new stuff gets tested there.
In real world if a worldpower wish to make a statement of its ablity to strike and it fails.. that's a big problem. It confirms what hardcore NaTO analysts alllege about russian capablities.
It's still embarrassing that it failed. It's also dangerous that it failed, because it now emboldens the US/NATO to attack Russia even harder. Then again, there have been several US and UK test missile exercises that have failed in the last few years. One of the funniest what when one of the UK's nuclear subs launched a missile, and instead of heading towards South Africa, it headed directly towards the US 🤣
I thinks with all the escalation, Dima is just saying the quite part out loud. Sure it’s a missile test but everyone knows what they can carry. Keep doing a good job Dima !!!
@@pierrepatapon1547 it was'nt even a test. It exploded in the silo.. sabotage for sure. Tighten up security would do the trick. I presume you are in the reciving end. Good luck.
Every single device that works flawlessly went through many failed tests during the development phase. I can only assume that the people who make fun of the failed Sarmat test have never been part of a serious project.
The sarmet was supposedly out of testing and in service, considering the last 2 tests have been complete failures, that might have been premature. Maybe Putin can beg a few ICBM’s off of North Korea but considering how many North Korean munitions Russia just squandered at Toropets, I don’t think more aid shipments are heading to Russia. Russia needs to stop shooting down these Ukrainian drones if that’s the damage falling debris are causing, that looked like a 5kt nuke going off
@@mindlos3960 how do you figure that? Over 1000+ F-35’s built and 4-5 crash’s mostly due to pilot era. Su-57 on the other hand has only 15-20 tops built and 2 have crashed and 1 to 2 lost to Ukrainian drones🤣. The Sarmat has exploded more times than it has flown
❤❤ Dima may need to show a certain level of impartiality in his reporting, perhaps to be in accordance with yt guidelines that we are not aware of but he, as a content creator, is required to do so, to keep his news channel viable and up on the platform. Dont be too hard on him, he has a family and 2 other helpers to support.
I was puzzled, but finally I figured what is Zelensky's victory plan: he will extract few more billions for himself and his Kiev friends, if you give it some thought that's really victory for him... not the kind of victory people expected, but hey, he's a comedian after all...
No, this is the illusion. The real reason the USA are supporting Ukraine is because Ukraine has over 12 trillion in natural resources in the eastern regions of Ukraine. All the evidence can be found by reading: Critical Minerals and U.S. Public Policy, U.S. Department of Defense’s National Defense Strategy, U.S. Critical Materials Strategy reports, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports, International Energy Agency (IEA) reports, Brookings Institution publications, Council on Foreign Relations publications, Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports, 2021 U.S.-Ukraine memorandum on critical minerals.
m3bmuadib Refinement is the main objective of a test. If it fails then something has to be fixed. If it flies, drives or plays music but doesn’t fulfill the original specifications then it’s not a complete failure it’s a work in progress
Lavrov stressed that Moscow also does not want an escalation of the Ukraine conflict that would drag the West in as a direct participant, but reiterated that this would inevitably be the case if Kiev is allowed to use long-range weapons deep inside Russia. “It would be a direct war of NATO against Russia… NATO is already waging a war against Russia, but it is a hybrid war through the hands of Ukrainians. If we are talking about long-range missile weapons, it is clear to everyone that the Ukrainians themselves will not be able to use them,” he stated, explaining that tasks such as target guidance, data collection from satellites and forming flight assignments can only be carried out by specialists from countries that produce a particular weapon. Lavrov went on to accuse Western officials who are seriously considering allowing Ukraine to make indiscriminate attacks on Russia of having the “mindset of a child” playing with matches. - RT
@@MartijnTijssen-y4m After 20 years of war and full occupation of Afghanistan, the US and its allies have only succeeded in replacing the Taliban with the Taliban, which is a much more ridiculous result. So, based on your reasoning, I should conclude that NATO is not even capable of defeating the Taliban? 🤣
❤❤ They are a triad nuclear mitary force. Which h one of 3 sources they use is up to the situation at hand and other conditions. AIR,SEA,LAND is considered a triad sources.
I totally disagree. Any missile started from a sub would have to fly too far to almost landlocked Ua. It would be far safer and quicker to launch a missile from a plane, together with other missiles. But you want to make sure that the air defence in your target area won't be able to counter you.
You are giving misinformation Dima. What was destroyed in the ammo depot strike (in terms of tonnage) is equivalent to what RF forces for SMO uses in 12 hours. It will have no impact on the progress of SMO. If you want to provide a balance, analytical report it is best to not rely so heavily on Ukrainian sources, which are almost always grossley exaggerated and thoroughly misleading.
Dima got Sarmat statistics wrong. Every launch was a success. Except for this one. Western sources have been saying of 2 unsuccessful launches based on unconfirmed sources. In reality only 1 bad launch. p. s. Can Dima provide the dates of when he thinks 4 launches of Sarmat had gone wrong? besides this one? It would be easy to check each one of them.
MILITARY TUBE TODAY - Strong footage of a powerful assault by the Airborne Assault Battalion of the 40th Guards Kamchatka Marine Brigade, shows the landing of stormtroopers on the front line, threatening the cauldron of the Armed Forces of Ukraine group in the town of Ugledar south of Donetsk. The Russian military correspondent shared the video on September 21, 2024, showing how the Russian assault force in an armored vehicle, successfully landed, attacked Zelensky's men, and occupied their stronghold. The thrilling assault was not without the work of scouts, where previously the Supercam unmanned aerial vehicle of the Pacific Fleet Marine Brigade, detected enemy positions, and the military equipment they were hiding. The Supercam UAV is used for in-depth reconnaissance, flying up to 70 kilometers into the enemy's rear, is almost silent and its integrated camera is the best in its class. The personnel and weapons found were destroyed on the same day, then the stormtroopers entered the next day. The Russian channel showed on the map the direction of the attack, after forcing Kashlagach River, the Kamchatka Marine Brigade continued to advance, and expanded the bridgehead west of Ugledar. The group of about 8 stormtroopers, in addition to driver, continued to bypass the Ukrainian defenses, hitting with shot after shot from close range directly in the enemy trenches, and without losses on the Russian side. They also attacked with FPV drones, eliminating Kiev personnel, and burning their equipment. As a result of the successful landing, the Marines occupied an important stronghold near Ugledar, which threatened to encircle the town. This meant that the town would soon be squeezed, the prospect of holding positions in such conditions was not encouraging for the Ukrainian troops still entrenched there. On the same day on the Ugledar cauldron, video footage was published of the breakthrough, where Kashlagach River and the advance to Novoukrainka began. More than 20 square kilometers of territory were liberated by Russian stormtroopers from the tank formations of the Vostok group from Buryatia, after fighting at the recently liberated Prechistovka. The ranks of Ukrainian soldiers wavered, about 12 men from the 58th Infantry Brigade, who valued life more than the Nationalist ideals, laid down their weapons, and raised their hands in repose. The surviving tank crew prisoners, lucky for the time being, spoke in a video published by Buryatia stormtroopers.
This adds an in-depth insight to Dima's report and is valuable material contributing to general comprehension of the situation. Thank you for these additional reports of the current battle on this front.
@@Schurkie505 Russian aircraft (Su-34 for instance: $34M) aren't worth a hundred million per aircraft unlike the F-35 ($109M). 10 being gone is over a billion dollars down the drain. US pocketbook hurts way more than Russia's.
Hitler rationalizing indiscriminate violence and brutality of SA units (at the time he found them indispensable): "They do, what they do". Zelensky rationalizing existence of neonazi AZOV units: "They are, who they are."
Месяц назад+2
We know that they are the bad guys, but they are _our_ bad guys. - NATO
@@MrAppyCow There was a USA backed coup in 2014 in Ukraine. One can see that as an invasion and removing the government and plant puppets. There is a phone recording of Nuland planning this. Find it.
@@hongry-life That's a silly way to twist the meaning of my comment. Was there war before the invasion? Russia declared the war for which I see so many accounts demand peace from NATO. Playing the victim and downplaying Russia's role in all of it. NATO are no saints, but to think Russia is just a passager in all of this and doesn't act coercively for it's own interests is delusional. I'm pointing out hypocrisy and the ridiculousness of some of these comments that I suspect some are bots. I'm not an expert, on the matter but neither are you, so don't message me with a superior attitude.
@@MrAppyCow "Was there war [...]?" so you are saying there was no civil w** from 2014 to 2022 and AFU was not committing punitive strikes daily in the Donbas?
I don't think they are 'failing'. They are tweaking the variables, knowing that their predictions (simulations) may not be accurate. So each 'failure' is just a data point.
These silos generally are used for testing. It is more important that strategic missiles are mobile and not in silos, which are easy and static targets. And tests are for this, to test and can fail. All within normality.
@@MrAppyCowOH SORRY for encouraging the right side in this war sorry for being on the side that is historically right idc what you say you have no arguments the us did this and they will pay with all of Europe
@@d3vodestroyer519 Frist of all, I can tell you missed the point of my comment by the way you answered. No need to get emotional. I'm sane enough to accept different views of the world. What I can't stand is hypocricy and double standards. I agree that West is guilty as well, but the russian side of media is full of it. You just cognitively blur it so it's not appearent.
@@MrAppyCow You say that yet Russian media has provided really the only reliable reports about all of this for the last 2 years while western/Ukrainian sources have proven themselves unreliable wishful thinking and/or outright misinfromation. Established proven reality does not match your claims.
So far, the Sarmat had both successful and unsuccessful tests. That means it works but it has a flaw that can lead to some cases of failure. Iron it out.
Rocket tests are always complicated and don't have always the purpose to launch, but to put maximum stress on a single module and collect data how it behaved until everything broke apart. Very common at spaceX tests for example
It’s important to never look at isolated events or small victories here and there. The greater picture is what matters, and who wins in the end is what matters. And in that matter, Russia is beating Ukraine.
We Don't Negotiate With TERRORISTS: Russia Officially Refused To Negotiate With The WEST and UKRAINE The situation of the Ukrainian Army continues to deteriorate rapidly in the Kursk region and other directions of the front. Against this backdrop, the Russian Armed Forces continue to launch massive missile strikes on the territory of Ukraine almost every day. With these massive missile attacks, Russia is not only disrupting enemy logistics but also significantly reducing the combat potential of the Ukrainian Army and NATO forces. By the way, today was also no exception in terms of massive Russian missile attacks on the territory of Ukraine. - BORZZIKMAN
Wow, disinfo right at the start. No Nuclear Weapon was tested, it was allegedly a missile launch. Also, "according to Ukranian Sources"? You're kidding, right?
Guys, honest question: why is nobody mentioning the F16 gamechangers anymore? I mean, 17% of Ukrainian fleet was destroyed by the drunk pilot of the garbage plane, but still the remaining 83%, that is, the 5 of them left, what are they doing?
For the people who think that a missile exploding shows Russian weakness, just take a look at the number of rockets from Space X that exploded, Rockets are very complex and it only takes one tiny problem to cause a major failure.
Avangard is a HGV: hypersonic glide vehicle. It can carry nuclear and conventional payload. The kinetic impact alone is about 20 tons of TNT but that can be enhanced with an explosive payload. As for the claims that one storage facility provides ammo for 2 months of war that is nonsense. There is no such storage capability in a single facility on the face of the Earth. Ammo expenditure is so huge that one facility barely holds enough for a few days.
Don't you bring reality to this discussion... the OTAN fan boys need something, anything to give hope now that the battle on the ground is "developing not in Ukraine's favor" so hard every day.
Northrop was working on a stealth cruise missile in the late 80s and early 90s. TSSAM. TriService Standoff Attack cruise Missile.They spent 2 billion on the program but never got it to fly.
I am not sure about that claim of foreign intelligence of the missile explosion. That picture of the SARMAT test site seems suspicious to me. No tower or launch wreckage anywhere, no rescue vehicles and no smoke from small lingering fires that burnt all the grass at the site. All the foliage on the cleared part has supposedly burned off yet no black burned patches and all the tree and shrubbery in the area show zero signs of damage or fire. Who knows when this picture was taken. This picture could well have been taken months after a failed missile test years ago and no one can tell if the satellite picture is doctored. I'll wait for more evidence.
@@hongry-life you won't if it's a silo explosion. Only source for that is the US satelites that will have picked it up,they sit monitoring the silos for a launch.
Whatever. The revelation that Russian nukes can't get off the ground should be given to Biden along with Zelensky's Victory Plan, so he can make an informed decision.
Some confusions rised b your description of Avangard system : is not a "warhead" but yes, a hypersonic vehicle - a manuvering glider - who sits on top of the missile (the carrier) and is released at high altitude, moment when it starts maneuvering, in a variable, unpredictible trajectory, towards its target, at speeds reaching Mach 20 (high hypersonic). And yes, is true, easy to check for anyone with basic math skills, the kinetic energy of an object hitting its target as such speed multiplicated many times by the object mass, can reach very high values, in this case, equal or even bigger than the explosion of 18 tons of TNT. But the big problem for the target is in the fact the vehicle can be hardened enough to penetrate very deep underground, making such a weapon devastating even for deep, well protected bunkers...
it is a test to make it work %100. tests can fail. it is normal. Anyway its a newest missile(2023). Russia still got other active missiles like: RSM-56 Bulava (2018) MIRV-equipped/SS-NX-30 RS-24 Yars (2011): MIRV-equipped. R-29RMU Sineva MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Sineva mode 2 R-29RMU2 (2014) MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Liner R-36M2 Voevoda / SS-18 Satan UR-100N 15A30 / SS-19 Stiletto RT-2PM Topol / 15Zh58 / SS-25 Sickle RT-2PM2 Topol-M / SS-27 / RS12M1 / RS12M2 R-29R SS-N-18 Stingray R-29RK SS-N-18 Stingray Mod 2 R-29RL MIRV-equipped/SS-N-18 Stingray Mod 3 R-29RM MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Skiff Sleep well. all of them passed tests!!!
I'm thrilled that Russia is finally taking their security seriously by testing Sarmats and Avangards. These are horrifying weapons the likes of which the world has never seen and will send a strong message of deterrence. It's disappointing to hear of the failed test but much like a space rocket it's important to test these weapons systems carefully to determine their boundaries and capabilities. These type of tests make the weapons systems more reliable which means less chance of danger to innocent civilians which Russia, unlike their nazi enemies, take quite seriously.
This calls for a revision control to learn if any sabotage has been taking place. Like the one time a Topol was found having the gyro upside down. Inspection showed 15 other Topols had the same flaw. It was a bunch of pacifist mechanics who sabotage them.
actually the missile was never launched the crater occurred after the fuelling stage of the test had encountered some fire anomalies, according to the west outlets the cobra ball which tracked such missile launches never detected sarmat launch at all and the type of crater showed it was caused by fire from fuel leak in a forest test site
It seems to me that Dima with some kind of pleasure reports on failure of the Sarmat launch and the damage caused by Ukrainian attacks on Russian ammo storages.
You were the only one who firmly thought they were drones, but if you looked carefully you would have known that the best drones supplied to Ukraine travel at most like the DJI Phantom 3 SE: 4 km, a little more if they have repeaters scattered around the place. In that sector in Russia it was impossible to install receivers, and it was at a good distance from any kind of drone at 400 km.
It is possible that Ukraine used Kursk operation to insert sabotage groups inside Russia armed with drones. Probably Russia stored missiles outside the silos while waiting for transport and that was a easy target.
For at least a year they've made stabs with modified UJ-22 and A-22 civilian prop planes. Few weeks ago one was videoed inside Russia near Finland being shot down. And it's happened before, wreckage included. These aren't quad copters! Modified passenger planes evade defense by flying very low and of course appear as civilian so pass unremarked. Also, whose to say they won't try even larger planes?
I doubt tests like that would be done near Moscow. There was a report a few days ago that the nuclear test site on Novaya Zemlya was brought back in order for new tests. So with so many test site areas more isolated for security. It's doubtful they would use a site so near the Moscow region.
@@Alec72HD But later indeed about a new warhead called Avantgard. Edit: The Avangard (Russian: Авангард, "Vanguard"; previously known as Objekt 4202, Yu-71 and Yu-74) is a Russian hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) that can be carried as an MIRV payload by the UR-100UTTKh,[9][10] R-36M2 and RS-28 Sarmat heavy ICBMs. It can deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads." (Wikipedia) Interesting that Avangard in Russian would be Vanguard (typo edited), like the USA entity with 1000 tentacle companies and institutions. Weird that USA loves the Russian word then. "The vanguard (sometimes abbreviated to van and also called the advance guard) is the leading part of an advancing military formation" Hm... shines a new light on throwing new conscripts in a van...
The Sarmat is a new missile. I don't even know if it is operational yet. This was not a nuclear test. That would have been major news. It would have meant that Russia was leaving the nuclear test ban treaty.
Complete list of things to read that will prove the USA is invested only in the resources: Critical Minerals and U.S. Public Policy, U.S. Department of Defense’s National Defense Strategy, U.S. Critical Materials Strategy reports, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports, International Energy Agency (IEA) reports, Brookings Institution publications, Council on Foreign Relations publications, Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports, 2021 U.S.-Ukraine memorandum on critical minerals.
Do we really have to let so many people die for these minerals. There are many counties that can sell mineral rights to the US let’s start there. This war is a silly man’s folly.
The failed test of a missile that has been already put in service (if correct)? This is quite a news to scratch it as briefly. Someone gotta clarify this. Too much hype and too much mess in the news (not unusual)
Fake news I'm thinking. Who knows when this picture was taken? No smoke, all shrubbery and perimeter trees have zero damage, no wreckage or rescue vehicles. Satellite photo would be easy to fake.
One learns more from one's failures in testing than from one's successes. Unless the Russians are paying less than no attention, then these failures aren't nearly as complete as is being supposed.
I look at the picture and ask a couple of questions having seen videos of some of the major launches of the huge ballistic missile launches. First, large crater but where is the debris? Nothing appears to be scattered like huge chunks of concrete. Second, not much of a scorch mark around the crater. Why with all that fuel wasn't a giant torch sent off into space as well as burning 50-100 meters out in all directions especially into the forests the way the two ammo dumps burned. Just above the word "time" is a typical missile silo. (You don't stick 2 silos together in the same area) It has a huge protective cap with a door that blows open seconds before the firing trigger. There is a strip to the right where the tractor trailed maneuvers in to set up for the massive tilting of the missile to lower it into the silo. In this region there are a number of combat silos (62 d 42.50m 99s North 40d 11 m 04.07 s East ) The Kosmodrom Piesetsk is at 62d 55m 39.75s North 40d 34m 30.0 s East. For a US Minuteman II silo (there are 4 north of this one off Nebraska Hwy 71) go to 41d 17m 42.55s North 103d 39m 41.45s West. Again only one missile per immediate area.
It seems that Kursk ukrainian operation can be now considered as a failure: huge lost of personnal, vehicles and other equipment, impossibility to reach the nuclear central of Kursk. Thus, Mr Zelensky is coming , day after day, to be the loser world champion ! Unfortunately, the support countries did not realize or cannot admit that the carrots are already cooked and this will certainly bring more and more issues to their own people standard of living conditions.
So. A few warehouses go bang? How many more does Russia have and how quickly can it stock such a warehouse? Answer. Lots and rather rapidly. At the moment Ukraine cannot strike such targets fast enough and all at once across all of Russia, so as to strategically impact the current direction of the conflict.
all this makes no sense. so close to Moscow towns are one next to another without any distance. They show area where NO FREE SPACE AVAILABLE for such testing site. all bs.
The US Minuteman III ICBM for example has failed on the launchpad both in 2023 and 2022 and its development is stalled. The Sarmat is in Military Service and is continually improved and updated its latest variants being 2018 and 2022. The Russians will just get back to work learn, improve and succeed because they are unrivaled by anyone this isn't a setup back, embarrassing or anything like that that is typical Western media whitewashing and Russians don't care I don't care (and I aint even Russian) Russia has many ICBM missiles which are decades ahead of US equivalents the marvelous 'Topol' for example. Then there is the 'Avangard' a nuclear powered jet engine intercontinental ballistic glide vehicle for which passed tests and has no equal in the World PERIOD! No one doubts Russian ICBM Missile Firepower but Western Media Propaganda will always paint the picture of the opposite. In War with NATO guess what Russia would do in the first few minutes Cripple American and NATO Satellite's and ISR and how will it do it? On September 17th Russia lunched the Angara-1.2 rocket carrying a classified payload into Earth's orbit, With military satellites on board, the exact mission remained undisclosed. Russia has launched the Kosmos 2575 military satellite in 2024 and similarly in 2002 and 2023 this baby sparked allot of concern in Washington. Off course this is not relevant to Country 404 formally Ukraine.
Sarmat not quite as bad as USSR's N1 moon rocket that blew catastrophically 4 times in a row with out ever reaching space, first launch killing almost a 100 people
Testing a missile system (not a “nuclear warhead”) popping up from a nuclear hardened bunker is quite complex. The silo itself must be properly built and maintained. If you have 3 successes and 5 failures for a brand new system, that’s actually not a very bad ratio. The missile has proven it works with 3 successes. After successes, the designers will test for abnormal launch conditions or the silo may have reached a point of degradation such that it no longer provides a viable launch environment. Remember, this is not an open air launch. Massive amounts of explosive power must be properly vented, this is a liquid propulsion rocket so the lines attached to the missile must be fully functional. If you keep using the same test silo over and over for the same missile - that wear and tear could cause problems. The Sarmat is a HUGE and heavy missile. The Baluga missile (SLBM) went through 10 years of nothing but failure before it was perfected. As for using such an outrageously expensive strategic missile system on Ukraine - that would be insane. These are not mass produced missiles and serve as the core, or backbone, of Russia’s strategic deterrent. For all the emotions surrounding this conflict - it would make no sense to use this missile in that theater. That would be absurd beyond belief.
Download iOS Military Summary Map: itunes.apple.com/app/id6477433117
THE MAP: dev.militarysummary.com
Store: www.militarysummary.store/
Google doc: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18WfJv1_DOlFOzvjh6iT1N8ltDvaCeWu1cPK_eaHKCR4/edit?usp=sharing
Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-1613003
Telegram channel: t.me/militarysummary
Twitter: twitter.com/MilitarySummary
Email: military.summary.info@gmail.com
Patreon: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true
Help the channel: www.donationalerts.com/r/military_summary
Help the channel: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true
You are best thank you for your updates❤
The test could have been a failed test on purpose to show the West that Russia is serious about the nuclear option.
Dima. The test is a test to check the fuel flow. Has nothing to do with the missile itself. Its a failure in the pipes at the facility. Sabotage??
Z
nuclear test failed,what a suprise 😏
The Sarmat is an ICBM. Russia had ICBMS in Service for decades and nobody doubts their ability to deliver nuclear warheads to any point in the world. Moscow doesn´t need to demonstrate that by shooting a maneuverable hypersonic Avantgard vehicle into US territory with just a payload of concrete.
Furthermore, the Sarmat missile has already been adopted into regular military service last year, which means that the testing phase was already over and the tests were successful.
So whatever went boom on that test pad was most likely not a Sarmat missile, but who knows what new stuff gets tested there.
Russia has a missile with a nuclear jet engine that can fly around the globe until given a target.
In real world if a worldpower wish to make a statement of its ablity to strike and it fails.. that's a big problem. It confirms what hardcore NaTO analysts alllege about russian capablities.
Idioot😂😂😂
@@Ricardo-lb4soand what does it confirm? 🤔
Sounds a bit odd, for NATO who doesn't even have hypersonic weapons yet
They prob testing something new
Dima its not nuclear test its missle test capable of carying nukes. Dont be fool.
Exactly.
It's still embarrassing that it failed. It's also dangerous that it failed, because it now emboldens the US/NATO to attack Russia even harder. Then again, there have been several US and UK test missile exercises that have failed in the last few years. One of the funniest what when one of the UK's nuclear subs launched a missile, and instead of heading towards South Africa, it headed directly towards the US 🤣
I thinks with all the escalation, Dima is just saying the quite part out loud. Sure it’s a missile test but everyone knows what they can carry. Keep doing a good job Dima !!!
@@MnemonicCarriercrazy times , This situation can definitely lead to global catastrophe if not extinction.
Power corrupts!!!
Correct!
.
This is why you test your stuff. To make sure it wont fail in a hot situation.
The cope is strong here.
@@pierrepatapon1547 it was'nt even a test. It exploded in the silo.. sabotage for sure. Tighten up security would do the trick. I presume you are in the reciving end. Good luck.
@@bjabbbjabb1286 😂😂😂😂😂
Ruscism lead to psychiatry, obviously.
Dude, take care of your mental health
@@bjabbbjabb1286 I don't even know if it is true, it is only reported by ukranian sources
Ugledar is standing. Slava Zelenski
Every single device that works flawlessly went through many failed tests during the development phase. I can only assume that the people who make fun of the failed Sarmat test have never been part of a serious project.
@@nightelfuser sure but consider for a second the differences between this and Franklins kite experiment
Sarmat testing was completed almost two years ago, it entered serial production. The whole story is just bs.
The sarmet was supposedly out of testing and in service, considering the last 2 tests have been complete failures, that might have been premature. Maybe Putin can beg a few ICBM’s off of North Korea but considering how many North Korean munitions Russia just squandered at Toropets, I don’t think more aid shipments are heading to Russia. Russia needs to stop shooting down these Ukrainian drones if that’s the damage falling debris are causing, that looked like a 5kt nuke going off
Just refer critics of the Sarmat to the F35 jet if they are loooing for a military dud.
@@mindlos3960 how do you figure that? Over 1000+ F-35’s built and 4-5 crash’s mostly due to pilot era. Su-57 on the other hand has only 15-20 tops built and 2 have crashed and 1 to 2 lost to Ukrainian drones🤣. The Sarmat has exploded more times than it has flown
Dima..''According to Ukrainian sources''......😂🤣😂😅
Dima got a medal from a box of Captain Crunch cereal and Zelenski put him on the team. Now while spinning yarns he guzzles Ukraine Kool-aid.
❤❤ Dima may need to show a certain level of impartiality in his reporting, perhaps to be in accordance with yt guidelines that we are not aware of but he, as a content creator, is required to do so, to keep his news channel viable and up on the platform.
Dont
be too hard on him, he has a family and 2 other helpers to support.
Yeah, this was an odd story, an explosion in a mine and then it would be a nuclear test. Not much info and details to back that story.
I was puzzled, but finally I figured what is Zelensky's victory plan: he will extract few more billions for himself and his Kiev friends, if you give it some thought that's really victory for him... not the kind of victory people expected, but hey, he's a comedian after all...
No, this is the illusion. The real reason the USA are supporting Ukraine is because Ukraine has over 12 trillion in natural resources in the eastern regions of Ukraine. All the evidence can be found by reading: Critical Minerals and U.S. Public Policy, U.S. Department of Defense’s National Defense Strategy, U.S. Critical Materials Strategy reports, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports, International Energy Agency (IEA) reports, Brookings Institution publications, Council on Foreign Relations publications, Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports, 2021 U.S.-Ukraine memorandum on critical minerals.
@@James-z6x3u I know... but that's Russia now, or in the near future
This is afgsnistan 2.0.. churn out a battle with no real plan to win for the next 20 years.. all so russia cant sell oil and gas to europe.
Zelensky is 💯% only consernewith saving his life. They even brought Zulshney to Keiv as a little reminder they have a replacement
One thing is certain - Zelensky is the first comedian in history who is responsible for so many dead and crippled human beings.
Failures are the main objective of a test
m3bmuadib Refinement is the main objective of a test. If it fails then something has to be fixed. If it flies, drives or plays music but doesn’t fulfill the original specifications then it’s not a complete failure it’s a work in progress
Lavrov stressed that Moscow also does not want an escalation of the Ukraine conflict that would drag the West in as a direct participant, but reiterated that this would inevitably be the case if Kiev is allowed to use long-range weapons deep inside Russia.
“It would be a direct war of NATO against Russia… NATO is already waging a war against Russia, but it is a hybrid war through the hands of Ukrainians. If we are talking about long-range missile weapons, it is clear to everyone that the Ukrainians themselves will not be able to use them,” he stated, explaining that tasks such as target guidance, data collection from satellites and forming flight assignments can only be carried out by specialists from countries that produce a particular weapon.
Lavrov went on to accuse Western officials who are seriously considering allowing Ukraine to make indiscriminate attacks on Russia of having the “mindset of a child” playing with matches. - RT
i like to let you know Ukraine successfuly attack ammo dumps 400-500km from Ukraine wcalp or ATCSM have range 350 or 250 km
@@MartijnTijssen-y4m After 20 years of war and full occupation of Afghanistan, the US and its allies have only succeeded in replacing the Taliban with the Taliban, which is a much more ridiculous result. So, based on your reasoning, I should conclude that NATO is not even capable of defeating the Taliban? 🤣
@@MartijnTijssen-y4m You are obviously the grandchild of the child playing with matches.
A most brilliant reply, love from UK
@@MartijnTijssen-y4m Ukraine and the 52 countries that are backing it will eventually lose.
If Russia uses nukes I'd bet they would come from a submarine.
there has been a theory for a long time that they have nukes in American cities already, in hiding waiting for a signal to blow.
Doesn't take the brain's of Einstein to work that one out,same would happen on both sides.
❤❤ They are a triad nuclear mitary force. Which h one of 3 sources they use is up to the situation at hand and other conditions. AIR,SEA,LAND is considered a triad sources.
This says nothing about end result of test...
I totally disagree. Any missile started from a sub would have to fly too far to almost landlocked Ua. It would be far safer and quicker to launch a missile from a plane, together with other missiles. But you want to make sure that the air defence in your target area won't be able to counter you.
You are giving misinformation Dima. What was destroyed in the ammo depot strike (in terms of tonnage) is equivalent to what RF forces for SMO uses in 12 hours. It will have no impact on the progress of SMO. If you want to provide a balance, analytical report it is best to not rely so heavily on Ukrainian sources, which are almost always grossley exaggerated and thoroughly misleading.
👏👏👏
He's afraid if he doesn't, they will cut him off of Ukraine Kool-aid!
Funny as hell adabotnik seems you're watching too much Orcky TV propaganda always down playing Ukrainian achievements 😂
@@tetractysAur What has Ukraine achieved since this w*r began outside of bleeding the EU and NATO dry of their money and weapons?
@@tetractysAur turn the mirror 🪞 around 👿🤡
Dima got Sarmat statistics wrong. Every launch was a success. Except for this one. Western sources have been saying of 2 unsuccessful launches based on unconfirmed sources. In reality only 1 bad launch.
p. s. Can Dima provide the dates of when he thinks 4 launches of Sarmat had gone wrong? besides this one? It would be easy to check each one of them.
😂😂😂😂....I think Dima is now turning into. Parrot...🤣🤣🤣🤣
Even this One Is unconfirmed, the pictures look dodgy
" Russia is never as strong as it looks. Russia is never as weak as it looks." Napoleon
interesting quote
Anyway, the most dangerous vector of nukes is the submarines, neither planes, nor balistic missiles
MILITARY TUBE TODAY - Strong footage of a powerful assault by the Airborne Assault Battalion of the 40th Guards Kamchatka Marine Brigade, shows the landing of stormtroopers on the front line, threatening the cauldron of the Armed Forces of Ukraine group in the town of Ugledar south of Donetsk. The Russian military correspondent shared the video on September 21, 2024, showing how the Russian assault force in an armored vehicle, successfully landed, attacked Zelensky's men, and occupied their stronghold. The thrilling assault was not without the work of scouts, where previously the Supercam unmanned aerial vehicle of the Pacific Fleet Marine Brigade, detected enemy positions, and the military equipment they were hiding. The Supercam UAV is used for in-depth reconnaissance, flying up to 70 kilometers into the enemy's rear, is almost silent and its integrated camera is the best in its class. The personnel and weapons found were destroyed on the same day, then the stormtroopers entered the next day.
The Russian channel showed on the map the direction of the attack, after forcing Kashlagach River, the Kamchatka Marine Brigade continued to advance, and expanded the bridgehead west of Ugledar. The group of about 8 stormtroopers, in addition to driver, continued to bypass the Ukrainian defenses, hitting with shot after shot from close range directly in the enemy trenches, and without losses on the Russian side. They also attacked with FPV drones, eliminating Kiev personnel, and burning their equipment. As a result of the successful landing, the Marines occupied an important stronghold near Ugledar, which threatened to encircle the town. This meant that the town would soon be squeezed, the prospect of holding positions in such conditions was not encouraging for the Ukrainian troops still entrenched there.
On the same day on the Ugledar cauldron, video footage was published of the breakthrough, where Kashlagach River and the advance to Novoukrainka began. More than 20 square kilometers of territory were liberated by Russian stormtroopers from the tank formations of the Vostok group from Buryatia, after fighting at the recently liberated Prechistovka. The ranks of Ukrainian soldiers wavered, about 12 men from the 58th Infantry Brigade, who valued life more than the Nationalist ideals, laid down their weapons, and raised their hands in repose. The surviving tank crew prisoners, lucky for the time being, spoke in a video published by Buryatia stormtroopers.
Must be true then...
This adds an in-depth insight to Dima's report and is valuable material contributing to general comprehension of the situation. Thank you for these additional reports of the current battle on this front.
@@robertmartin8436 which are sadly for you,not the truth.
SARMAT has been tested successfully many times. This time was to test new warheads. It blew up. Looks like it is ready.
Yep that was testing weapon. Imagine ukraine supporters thought it was caused by drone attacking arsenal in rusia lmao 🤣🤣🤣
What's some failed tests... Americans lost more than 10 F35s just taking off and landing😂
They lost another when a female pilot bailed out over North Carolina and it kept flying until running out of fuel. Found it three days later.
And Russian planes fall also out of the sky like flies
@@Schurkie505 Russian aircraft (Su-34 for instance: $34M) aren't worth a hundred million per aircraft unlike the F-35 ($109M). 10 being gone is over a billion dollars down the drain. US pocketbook hurts way more than Russia's.
Ask any US Marine if they like flying in an Osprey.
Even some that they cannot find any more, including the pilots. Very weird.
Hitler rationalizing indiscriminate violence and brutality of SA units (at the time he found them indispensable):
"They do, what they do".
Zelensky rationalizing existence of neonazi AZOV units:
"They are, who they are."
We know that they are the bad guys, but they are _our_ bad guys. - NATO
Peace not NATO🧙♂️
Who invaded who again?
@@MrAppyCow There was a USA backed coup in 2014 in Ukraine. One can see that as an invasion and removing the government and plant puppets. There is a phone recording of Nuland planning this. Find it.
@@MrAppyCow The history of the conflict did not start at Feb 2022 out of the blue. Inform yourself better.
@@hongry-life That's a silly way to twist the meaning of my comment.
Was there war before the invasion? Russia declared the war for which I see so many accounts demand peace from NATO. Playing the victim and downplaying Russia's role in all of it.
NATO are no saints, but to think Russia is just a passager in all of this and doesn't act coercively for it's own interests is delusional.
I'm pointing out hypocrisy and the ridiculousness of some of these comments that I suspect some are bots.
I'm not an expert, on the matter but neither are you, so don't message me with a superior attitude.
@@MrAppyCow "Was there war [...]?" so you are saying there was no civil w** from 2014 to 2022 and AFU was not committing punitive strikes daily in the Donbas?
Thank you Dima, great updates and analysis
I don't think they are 'failing'. They are tweaking the variables, knowing that their predictions (simulations) may not be accurate. So each 'failure' is just a data point.
😂No. Missile explodes impromptu on the ground prior to doing the whole flying to destination thing ... that's a failure!
These silos generally are used for testing. It is more important that strategic missiles are mobile and not in silos, which are easy and static targets. And tests are for this, to test and can fail. All within normality.
Exactly, and the bots that mock Russia for the failed tests don't get it because they have never partaken in a serious project before.
@@MrAppyCowOH SORRY for encouraging the right side in this war sorry for being on the side that is historically right idc what you say you have no arguments the us did this and they will pay with all of Europe
@@d3vodestroyer519 Frist of all, I can tell you missed the point of my comment by the way you answered. No need to get emotional. I'm sane enough to accept different views of the world.
What I can't stand is hypocricy and double standards. I agree that West is guilty as well, but the russian side of media is full of it. You just cognitively blur it so it's not appearent.
@@d3vodestroyer519 A country that spent 8 year bombing his civilian and had neo-nazi in it's governement can not be called "the right side"...
@@MrAppyCow You say that yet Russian media has provided really the only reliable reports about all of this for the last 2 years while western/Ukrainian sources have proven themselves unreliable wishful thinking and/or outright misinfromation.
Established proven reality does not match your claims.
So far, the Sarmat had both successful and unsuccessful tests. That means it works but it has a flaw that can lead to some cases of failure. Iron it out.
Like Minuteman III (see november 2023 test) and the last two English Tridents launched from submarines.
Reminds me of SpaceX with bunch of failures in 2014+ years. It's a normal thing to fail and collect data to improve.
The test doesn't have to be about carrier but also warhead. There's a reason why conventional warheads are not used in ICBMs (physics).
Rocket tests are always complicated and don't have always the purpose to launch, but to put maximum stress on a single module and collect data how it behaved until everything broke apart. Very common at spaceX tests for example
Musk figured it out after dozens of failures practice make perfect
It’s important to never look at isolated events or small victories here and there. The greater picture is what matters, and who wins in the end is what matters. And in that matter, Russia is beating Ukraine.
We Don't Negotiate With TERRORISTS: Russia Officially Refused To Negotiate With The WEST and UKRAINE
The situation of the Ukrainian Army continues to deteriorate rapidly in the Kursk region and other directions of the front. Against this backdrop, the Russian Armed Forces continue to launch massive missile strikes on the territory of Ukraine almost every day. With these massive missile attacks, Russia is not only disrupting enemy logistics but also significantly reducing the combat potential of the Ukrainian Army and NATO forces. By the way, today was also no exception in terms of massive Russian missile attacks on the territory of Ukraine. - BORZZIKMAN
Zele still thinks he's a king, while living on hand outs. The king with no clothes 😂👍
What has he achieved since he became a president lol only found new foster parrent for his country lol Biden being his foster father lol
the emperor that destroyed his empire and people sadly
Wow, disinfo right at the start. No Nuclear Weapon was tested, it was allegedly a missile launch. Also, "according to Ukranian Sources"? You're kidding, right?
Guys, honest question: why is nobody mentioning the F16 gamechangers anymore? I mean, 17% of Ukrainian fleet was destroyed by the drunk pilot of the garbage plane, but still the remaining 83%, that is, the 5 of them left, what are they doing?
Apparently scrapped the idea of using them...
The Americans keep them back to avoid sales disaster in other countries. What, you think they care for the pilots safety? LOL
Good point. What about them?
It did not change any game... That's why..
Hiding
For the people who think that a missile exploding shows Russian weakness, just take a look at the number of rockets from Space X that exploded, Rockets are very complex and it only takes one tiny problem to cause a major failure.
Avangard is a HGV: hypersonic glide vehicle. It can carry nuclear and conventional payload. The kinetic impact alone is about 20 tons of TNT but that can be enhanced with an explosive payload. As for the claims that one storage facility provides ammo for 2 months of war that is nonsense. There is no such storage capability in a single facility on the face of the Earth. Ammo expenditure is so huge that one facility barely holds enough for a few days.
Don't you bring reality to this discussion... the OTAN fan boys need something, anything to give hope now that the battle on the ground is "developing not in Ukraine's favor" so hard every day.
Some people are impressed by fireworks. Ukraine needs new weapons: the Sparkler, the Screeching Devil, the Roman Candle.
The Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle travels at Mach 25, which explains its tremendous kinetic energy.
It is just a missile test only. Not a nuke test.
"The comet of Defeat is falling to UA with lightning speed and nothing can change it's course"
~ 🦕🦕🦕🌠☄️🔥🔥~
well i did see some comet landed in russia and it did create 3,8 magnitude eathquake
@@michalzajic8602 I'm sure the russians collected all the data on that...
Northrop was working on a stealth cruise missile in the late 80s and early 90s. TSSAM. TriService Standoff Attack cruise Missile.They spent 2 billion on the program but never got it to fly.
I am not sure about that claim of foreign intelligence of the missile explosion. That picture of the SARMAT test site seems suspicious to me. No tower or launch wreckage anywhere, no rescue vehicles and no smoke from small lingering fires that burnt all the grass at the site. All the foliage on the cleared part has supposedly burned off yet no black burned patches and all the tree and shrubbery in the area show zero signs of damage or fire. Who knows when this picture was taken. This picture could well have been taken months after a failed missile test years ago and no one can tell if the satellite picture is doctored. I'll wait for more evidence.
It's a silo explosion,which is hardened.
I see no signs of a recent explosion either.
@@hongry-life you won't if it's a silo explosion. Only source for that is the US satelites that will have picked it up,they sit monitoring the silos for a launch.
Whatever. The revelation that Russian nukes can't get off the ground should be given to Biden along with Zelensky's Victory Plan, so he can make an informed decision.
If it was an image from Maxxar it is a CIA production.
And the one that the brits were testing just end up next to the submarine that made the launch 😂😂😂
It's called a test,which happens. It's different to a silo explosion
@@SnakePliskin762 witch you can also call a test, and check the picture and you can see how old it looks
@@JohnSmith-lc6gq it's a test gone seriously wrong to cook a silo.
Just imagine what one of those Avingaurd hypersonic warheads would do to the European Parliament.
If the Russian can lift it off ground. Looks like they still can't.
I can't believe Dima swallowed that Sarmat story so easily. Big disappointment.
You can use Putin-Vril energy to fix that.
@@Br1cht Using brain is enough for me, I hope that thing you mentioned, whatever it is, helps you.
Denial is not a river in Egypt
He has to otherwise his site would be deleted like London real
Some confusions rised b your description of Avangard system : is not a "warhead" but yes, a hypersonic vehicle - a manuvering glider - who sits on top of the missile (the carrier) and is released at high altitude, moment when it starts maneuvering, in a variable, unpredictible trajectory, towards its target, at speeds reaching Mach 20 (high hypersonic).
And yes, is true, easy to check for anyone with basic math skills, the kinetic energy of an object hitting its target as such speed multiplicated many times by the object mass, can reach very high values, in this case, equal or even bigger than the explosion of 18 tons of TNT.
But the big problem for the target is in the fact the vehicle can be hardened enough to penetrate very deep underground, making such a weapon devastating even for deep, well protected bunkers...
Excellent content as usual. For English speakers "silo" would be more accurate than "mine" when referring to the launch sites.
it is a test to make it work %100. tests can fail. it is normal. Anyway its a newest missile(2023). Russia still got other active missiles like:
RSM-56 Bulava (2018) MIRV-equipped/SS-NX-30
RS-24 Yars (2011): MIRV-equipped.
R-29RMU Sineva MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Sineva mode 2
R-29RMU2 (2014) MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Liner
R-36M2 Voevoda / SS-18 Satan
UR-100N 15A30 / SS-19 Stiletto
RT-2PM Topol / 15Zh58 / SS-25 Sickle
RT-2PM2 Topol-M / SS-27 / RS12M1 / RS12M2
R-29R SS-N-18 Stingray
R-29RK SS-N-18 Stingray Mod 2
R-29RL MIRV-equipped/SS-N-18 Stingray Mod 3
R-29RM MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Skiff
Sleep well. all of them passed tests!!!
About the silo explosion lets wait what the russians say .
Yep. That will be the truth😂😂😂😂😂
Sarmat is the new russian ICBM. New weapons take time to BE reliable.
I is not even relevant to this war.
They have a lot of SS-18s.
Kid, you do not know what nuclear tests are?
I'm thrilled that Russia is finally taking their security seriously by testing Sarmats and Avangards. These are horrifying weapons the likes of which the world has never seen and will send a strong message of deterrence. It's disappointing to hear of the failed test but much like a space rocket it's important to test these weapons systems carefully to determine their boundaries and capabilities. These type of tests make the weapons systems more reliable which means less chance of danger to innocent civilians which Russia, unlike their nazi enemies, take quite seriously.
The USA had an icbm fail a few months ago. So this isn’t a big deal it happens. That’s why you test
This calls for a revision control to learn if any sabotage has been taking place. Like the one time a Topol was found having the gyro upside down. Inspection showed 15 other Topols had the same flaw. It was a bunch of pacifist mechanics who sabotage them.
Spasibo Bolshoye General Dima!
That seems like a burnt surface and not an explosion. 🤷♂️
Amazing news Dima.
Dima is talking a lot of nonsense about Sarmat and Avangard.
Avangard is so fast it is perfect bunker buster... So Zelensky will take long vacation somewhere out of UA i think
Avangard is a carrier for a nuclear warhead. It is a maneuverable carrier. One sarmat costs alot, too much to use randomly
That's why you test, the United States as far as we know hasn't done any.
actually the missile was never launched the crater occurred after the fuelling stage of the test had encountered some fire anomalies, according to the west outlets the cobra ball which tracked such missile launches never detected sarmat launch at all and the type of crater showed it was caused by fire from fuel leak in a forest test site
Sarmat is an ICBM. It can carry various armaments. So it was not a failed *_nuclear_* test. Click bait title.
I hear ukraine tanks have entered Moscow and are also on the outskirts of Vladivostok!😅
It seems to me that Dima with some kind of pleasure reports on failure of the Sarmat launch and the damage caused by Ukrainian attacks on Russian ammo storages.
Nyet to Naziukropnato...🤗❤️🇷🇺👍
No to new axis of evil Russia-North Korea-Iran
The sarmat test failed according to osint. Osint is open source intelligence.
osint is a pro-ukranian us backed group. weeb union made a report about their "work" and the flaws in it to favour ukranian positions
You were the only one who firmly thought they were drones, but if you looked carefully you would have known that the best drones supplied to Ukraine travel at most like the DJI Phantom 3 SE: 4 km, a little more if they have repeaters scattered around the place. In that sector in Russia it was impossible to install receivers, and it was at a good distance from any kind of drone at 400 km.
And if drones, was the ammo being stored in garden sheds? A drone cannot take out a hardened bunker!
It is possible that Ukraine used Kursk operation to insert sabotage groups inside Russia armed with drones. Probably Russia stored missiles outside the silos while waiting for transport and that was a easy target.
They use Cessna planes remote controlled
It makes it hard to shoot down because you risk killing a civilian
For at least a year they've made stabs with modified UJ-22 and A-22 civilian prop planes. Few weeks ago one was videoed inside Russia near Finland being shot down. And it's happened before, wreckage included. These aren't quad copters! Modified passenger planes evade defense by flying very low and of course appear as civilian so pass unremarked. Also, whose to say they won't try even larger planes?
Back to school Dima nobody test the missile Near the cities 😊 bla bla like always
Masters of the witches cauldron.
This is called "silo" not "mine" :)
Nuclear weapons will likely work in real life situations over 90%
I doubt tests like that would be done near Moscow. There was a report a few days ago that the nuclear test site on Novaya Zemlya was brought back in order for new tests. So with so many test site areas more isolated for security. It's doubtful they would use a site so near the Moscow region.
He never said there were any nuclear tests.
Pay attention.
@@Alec72HD He mentioned nuclear warheads at 3:29 min.
@@Alec72HD But later indeed about a new warhead called Avantgard.
Edit: The Avangard (Russian: Авангард, "Vanguard"; previously known as Objekt 4202, Yu-71 and Yu-74) is a Russian hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) that can be carried as an MIRV payload by the UR-100UTTKh,[9][10] R-36M2 and RS-28 Sarmat heavy ICBMs. It can deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads." (Wikipedia)
Interesting that Avangard in Russian would be Vanguard (typo edited), like the USA entity with 1000 tentacle companies and institutions. Weird that USA loves the Russian word then.
"The vanguard (sometimes abbreviated to van and also called the advance guard) is the leading part of an advancing military formation"
Hm... shines a new light on throwing new conscripts in a van...
@@Alec72HD And neither did I,read better.
@@hongry-life avant-guard is a French word, vanguard is originating from the French like many word used in the military.
Getting really tired of your misinformation and relying on “Ukrainian sources” and MSM. Just stick to the battleground.
This channel really took a nosedive
Sarmat is not a nuke Dima..😂😂.it is an ICBM. not yet armed when testing. Just a delivery machine.
The Sarmat is a new missile. I don't even know if it is operational yet. This was not a nuclear test. That would have been major news. It would have meant that Russia was leaving the nuclear test ban treaty.
Read this: Critical Minerals and U.S. Public Policy ... that explains this war.
12 trillion in rare earth minerals in Ukraine...
Complete list of things to read that will prove the USA is invested only in the resources: Critical Minerals and U.S. Public Policy, U.S. Department of Defense’s National Defense Strategy, U.S. Critical Materials Strategy reports, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports, International Energy Agency (IEA) reports, Brookings Institution publications, Council on Foreign Relations publications, Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports, 2021 U.S.-Ukraine memorandum on critical minerals.
Do we really have to let so many people die for these minerals. There are many counties that can sell mineral rights to the US let’s start there. This war is a silly man’s folly.
Using Sarmat to deliver conventional warheads would be insanely expensive. Far more expensive than 18 x Kinzhal.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂lol my Man do you really believe in the info from Ukraine?😂😂😂😂😂😂
This launch pad 43 of Plesetsk cosmodrome is like that since March 1980, when a Vostok 2M launch failed. The picture can be found on the internet.
Russia doesn't need to use nukes.
Go RUSSIA!!🇷🇺
The failed test of a missile that has been already put in service (if correct)? This is quite a news to scratch it as briefly. Someone gotta clarify this. Too much hype and too much mess in the news (not unusual)
Fake news I'm thinking. Who knows when this picture was taken? No smoke, all shrubbery and perimeter trees have zero damage, no wreckage or rescue vehicles. Satellite photo would be easy to fake.
Silo explosion,happened to a US Titan in 1980.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😜😛😜😜😛😝🤪🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
One learns more from one's failures in testing than from one's successes. Unless the Russians are paying less than no attention, then these failures aren't nearly as complete as is being supposed.
More than 6 minutes wasted on speculations. Stick with facts please. No need to play the "crystal ball" game.
Every time he spins a yarn, Zelenski sends him more Ukraine Kool-aid!
I look at the picture and ask a couple of questions having seen videos of some of the major launches of the huge ballistic missile launches. First, large crater but where is the debris? Nothing appears to be scattered like huge chunks of concrete. Second, not much of a scorch mark around the crater. Why with all that fuel wasn't a giant torch sent off into space as well as burning 50-100 meters out in all directions especially into the forests the way the two ammo dumps burned. Just above the word "time" is a typical missile silo. (You don't stick 2 silos together in the same area) It has a huge protective cap with a door that blows open seconds before the firing trigger. There is a strip to the right where the tractor trailed maneuvers in to set up for the massive tilting of the missile to lower it into the silo. In this region there are a number of combat silos (62 d 42.50m 99s North 40d 11 m 04.07 s East ) The Kosmodrom Piesetsk is at 62d 55m 39.75s North 40d 34m 30.0 s East. For a US Minuteman II silo (there are 4 north of this one off Nebraska Hwy 71) go to 41d 17m 42.55s North 103d 39m 41.45s West. Again only one missile per immediate area.
Interesting. What, then, would you speculate is the cause?
It seems that Kursk ukrainian operation can be now considered as a failure: huge lost of personnal, vehicles and other equipment, impossibility to reach the nuclear central of Kursk. Thus, Mr Zelensky is coming , day after day, to be the loser world champion ! Unfortunately, the support countries did not realize or cannot admit that the carrots are already cooked and this will certainly bring more and more issues to their own people standard of living conditions.
Russia has killed more than 15,000 in Kursk so far and the majority of the rest cannot escape. But Zelenski's plan is on target?
Bet you a dollar the US won't
Excellent reporting.
So. A few warehouses go bang? How many more does Russia have and how quickly can it stock such a warehouse? Answer. Lots and rather rapidly. At the moment Ukraine cannot strike such targets fast enough and all at once across all of Russia, so as to strategically impact the current direction of the conflict.
Nearly everyone commenting in chat is an expert. Jelly brain Crackups. 😂😂😂
Military summary channel telling us all again that we are about to be nuked...must be Sunday.
all this makes no sense. so close to Moscow towns are one next to another without any distance. They show area where NO FREE SPACE AVAILABLE for such testing site. all bs.
So the last 2 tests of the Sarmat either blew up in the silo or shortly after?!😂 I’m sure they have plenty left stored at Toropets….😂
The US Minuteman III ICBM for example has failed on the launchpad both in 2023 and 2022 and its development is stalled.
The Sarmat is in Military Service and is continually improved and updated its latest variants being 2018 and 2022.
The Russians will just get back to work learn, improve and succeed because they are unrivaled by anyone this isn't a setup back, embarrassing or anything like that
that is typical Western media whitewashing and Russians don't care I don't care (and I aint even Russian)
Russia has many ICBM missiles which are decades ahead of US equivalents the marvelous 'Topol' for example.
Then there is the 'Avangard' a nuclear powered jet engine intercontinental ballistic glide vehicle for which passed tests and has no equal in the World PERIOD!
No one doubts Russian ICBM Missile Firepower but Western Media Propaganda will always paint the picture of the opposite.
In War with NATO guess what Russia would do in the first few minutes Cripple American and NATO Satellite's and ISR and how will it do it?
On September 17th Russia lunched the Angara-1.2 rocket carrying a classified payload into Earth's orbit, With military satellites on board, the exact mission remained undisclosed.
Russia has launched the Kosmos 2575 military satellite in 2024 and similarly in 2002 and 2023 this baby sparked allot of concern in Washington.
Off course this is not relevant to Country 404 formally Ukraine.
COUNTRY 404, "FORMERLY" yakettyyak.
So a Sarmat was tested in a mine? Sounds odd to me.
Slava RUSSIA FROM MOROCCO!!!!!!
The Samart missiles could be repurposed to carry the father of all bombs it’s not a nuke but it packs quite a punch
Z Z Z Z until I die
You're already dead inside, Z-ombis.
Z- zombies eat brains, but there aren't any in UA...that's why.
that will be prety soon.russia is already Z nation
@@michalzajic8602 you have been in russia?
#2 🥉 🥉
Sarmat not quite as bad as USSR's N1 moon rocket that blew catastrophically 4 times in a row with out ever reaching space, first launch killing almost a 100 people
Testing a missile system (not a “nuclear warhead”) popping up from a nuclear hardened bunker is quite complex. The silo itself must be properly built and maintained. If you have 3 successes and 5 failures for a brand new system, that’s actually not a very bad ratio. The missile has proven it works with 3 successes. After successes, the designers will test for abnormal launch conditions or the silo may have reached a point of degradation such that it no longer provides a viable launch environment.
Remember, this is not an open air launch. Massive amounts of explosive power must be properly vented, this is a liquid propulsion rocket so the lines attached to the missile must be fully functional. If you keep using the same test silo over and over for the same missile - that wear and tear could cause problems.
The Sarmat is a HUGE and heavy missile. The Baluga missile (SLBM) went through 10 years of nothing but failure before it was perfected.
As for using such an outrageously expensive strategic missile system on Ukraine - that would be insane. These are not mass produced missiles and serve as the core, or backbone, of Russia’s strategic deterrent.
For all the emotions surrounding this conflict - it would make no sense to use this missile in that theater. That would be absurd beyond belief.
Nonsense, speculating every time.
I don't quite understand. If the missile blew up in the mine, why then was the test site destroyed off all vegetation?
Dima lives off his videos.
He needs to make it interesting even if is not completly true.
the day the west underestimating russian nuclear abilty is the day they lower their guard
Samrmat is not yet in production. Russia uses the highly tested RSM-56 and RS-24 Yars.
When you first fail, try and try again - it can only get better