Fascinating! It appears to have a far smaller selection of fathers than the ACCS, but with the trade-off of having more/longer commentary from the fathers that it does have. Certainly, the layout and overall design is more interesting than the ACCS. I'm particularly interested in the attempt at balance between Augustine and Jerome/Hebrew vs Greek. Throw in that the base text is Latin--it's as hodge-podge and brilliant as all things medieval. Excellent review, as always!
Thanks for commenting, Athanasius! In the preface, Dr. Klumpenhouwer says, "I intend to continue translating more books of the _Glossa Ordinaria_ and invite other scholars to join in this worthy venture." So I hope to see additional volumes in the future.
@@RGrantJones Dr. Klumpenhouwer has said that Emmaus Academic plans to release more volumes. He is already working on Matthew after which they hope to jump back to more of the Old Testament.
During my research on Bible commentaries, I have found that single-volume Bible commentaries are not that popular, as not much is there in this category, unlike Study Bibles. Both lay people and scholars prefer Study Bibles, and later move towards multi-volume commentaries, like the one you showed in this interview, for more depth. Will it be correct to assume?
Do you know what translated version of The Holy Holy Holy Heavenly Father written Word is written instructions such a way that it is written all of the herbs and erbs of the Earth are for man to eat and CONSUME (???)
The parallel MT and LXX Codex traditions are older than Jesus himself. In Dead Sea Scrolls proto-MT and proto-LXX canons are there already 💪. Jerome wanted to submit to Jewish Proto-MT tradition of 4th century and was against Apocrypha books. Whereas Augustine accepted the LXX tradition of Catholic Church for OT canon ✍ I personally and many Islamic scholars agree with Jerome's Biblical canon.
Thank you for bringing attention to this volume, I had never known something like this existed. Absolutely fascinating.
'Absolutely fascinating.' I think so, too. Thanks for commenting!
Thanks for keep posting all these in depth Bible videos. Always keep you in my prayers. God bless you.
Thank you. That's very kind of you. May God bless you and yours as well.
Fascinating! It appears to have a far smaller selection of fathers than the ACCS, but with the trade-off of having more/longer commentary from the fathers that it does have. Certainly, the layout and overall design is more interesting than the ACCS.
I'm particularly interested in the attempt at balance between Augustine and Jerome/Hebrew vs Greek. Throw in that the base text is Latin--it's as hodge-podge and brilliant as all things medieval.
Excellent review, as always!
Thanks for the encouragement, Paul!
I didn’t know an English translation of the medieval gloss exists. Thanks for the interesting review!
Thanks for commenting, Athanasius! In the preface, Dr. Klumpenhouwer says, "I intend to continue translating more books of the _Glossa Ordinaria_ and invite other scholars to join in this worthy venture." So I hope to see additional volumes in the future.
@@RGrantJones Dr. Klumpenhouwer has said that Emmaus Academic plans to release more volumes. He is already working on Matthew after which they hope to jump back to more of the Old Testament.
While it's certainly going to take forever, I hope they carry on with translating the entire Glossa.
I hope so, too. Thanks for commenting, Treeckonius!
Congratulations such a great Bible.
During my research on Bible commentaries, I have found that single-volume Bible commentaries are not that popular, as not much is there in this category, unlike Study Bibles. Both lay people and scholars prefer Study Bibles, and later move towards multi-volume commentaries, like the one you showed in this interview, for more depth. Will it be correct to assume?
I haven't spoken to many people about their preferences, but I think you're right.
Thank you for the review!
Thanks for commenting, kree935!
Impressive looking volume! The medieval commentaries are very interesting, the layout of the pages reminds me of the jewish talmud.
Thanks for commenting, EnragedKaiser237!
Is it well made , and does it come in a protective box .
Mine was shipped in a bubble wrap envelope. The book itself was tightly wrapped in transparent plastic.
@@RGrantJones many thanks .
God bless you .
Interesting.
Your sound quality has improved.
I think so, too. Thanks for commenting, Michael!
Thank you, Grant.
My pleasure. Thanks for commenting, Tony!
your sound is mainly or only coming from the left speaker. Check the audio settings to fix.
Thanks for your Review 🔥🤟 WoW💪💪💪🔥🤟
Thanks for commenting on these videos, Larrym.!
this looks amazing
Is this part of a set?
It is the first and only published volume. The translator has said that Matthew and Exodus are forthcoming.
Do you know what translated version of The Holy Holy Holy Heavenly Father written Word is written instructions such a way that it is written all of the herbs and erbs of the Earth are for man to eat and CONSUME
(???)
That sounds a bit like Genesis 1.29 to me. Thanks for commenting!
Thank you sir for the thorough review. It definitely looks interesting. I may have to put this is on my Christmas list. Blessings
i want this so bad !
Thanks for commenting!
You should consider reviewing a Rainbow Study Bible
The name Rainbow comes from God's promise to Noah, and not the lgbt
Thanks for the recommendation! I'll look into that study Bible.
The Navarre Study Bible has Official Latin Text of all of Catholic Bible, apart from RSV and commentary.
I haven't seen that study Bible yet, Hassan. Perhaps one of these days. Thanks for commenting!
The parallel MT and LXX Codex traditions are older than Jesus himself. In Dead Sea Scrolls proto-MT and proto-LXX canons are there already 💪. Jerome wanted to submit to Jewish Proto-MT tradition of 4th century and was against Apocrypha books. Whereas Augustine accepted the LXX tradition of Catholic Church for OT canon ✍ I personally and many Islamic scholars agree with Jerome's Biblical canon.