Number 2, the Shane Warne one is out. Not offering a shot so it doesn’t have to pitch in line or hit in line with the stumps and looked like it was going onto the stumps.
The issue is, there is no way you can predict that going on to hit the stumps. There was so much doubt you can't possibly give that out other than complete guess work.
It "probably" would have hit the stumps in fairness to Bucknor, but no way could he be "sure". That said, serves the batsman right. He's got bat in his hands, use it! Personally I've never had a problem with the bowler getting the benefit of the doubt when the batsman pads up. Speaking as a former bowler of course!
The two decisions given by the third umpires - the run out by Kalu and the catch by Inzi were not umpire mistakes. They were basically match fixing.. period
@@ramangarg9990 sir I am telling you what was told in that match in the commentary after that decision ... Please watch full match highlights .. because it was criticized straight away
Agreed. That would have been very close. Especially when you consider Warne used to bowl batsman from that delivery quite regularly. He could turn the ball that far and hit the stumps. It should not have been on this list, let alone number 2.
@@karannagodsuriya8535 Every LBW decision is a guess. No shot offered, and with the ball turning big; that looked like it was hitting the stumps to me. There's nothing wrong with the decision made there.
Amazing that Flintoff meekly walked after that bizarre decision. Knowing him, one would have expected him to raise at least an eyebrow in protest. As for the last one (Arvinda's), I think that called for a bit of sportsmanship from the fielder. 🙄
6, 5 and 3 were poor umpiring calls. No 1 was abysmal by the fielder who will have known they dropped the ball and still appealed. The others were before there was a chance to review decisions. In fact it was these kind of dismissals that reviews were brought in to be able to ensure the right one is made.
@@mangeshmahurkar6642 doesn’t matter if you don’t play a shot 🤷🏼♂️ Check the laws of the game. But I’d contend that there’s no way that was spinning back enough to hit the stumps when you consider how wide of off stump it pitched from a right arm bowler coming over the wicket and not bowling from particularly close to the stumps either. I know Warne spun the ball a lot, especially out of the rough, but not THAT much.
@@davidburke2132 in 2017 Australia tour of India, in 2nd test, shaun marsh will remains not out, even using the DRS. Shaun marsh offered no shot. So impact is important.
@@mangeshmahurkar6642 please, just read the laws of the game. Impact outside the line of off stump only protects a batter from LBW dismissal if playing a shot. It’s there in black and white in the rules. I’m not familiar with the case you mention, and if it’s as you briefly describe then it sounds like another umpiring error, and the rules aren’t based on umpiring errors, so I’ll just repeat again… read the rules.
Shakoor Rana was the worst Umpire in the world history. He used to openly cheat in favour of pakistan .. His many LBWs decisions were quite controversial
I used to umpire park level cricket. This guy's gone for a glance down leg side, and as far as I saw missed it by as much as Flintoff did his. But there was a noticeable noise.Not surprisingly the fielding side went up and I said not out. Which they weren't happy about. But I was sure he didn't hit it and the noise wasn't woody. Found out later it was the rubber grip on his bat that he had rolled down unrolling and popping back into place with a snap. The fella ended up making a ton, too his first every, so he was pretty happy.
At no 1 . Desilva was out. I remember that match ... He was declared out because the ball hit inizimam's trouser and not the ground.. his trouser was between ball and ground
I'm pretty sure Ricky Ponting got howler in his first innings of his first test match and was out for 96 Thus robbing him of a century on debut love Anthony Fed ex lol
If you go frame by frame on the last one, the ball lands in a fold in his pants, it looks like it might not actually make direct contact with the ground. Would be interesting to see what the rules state if that is indeed the case
Steve buckner was the king of Worst umpire. He was taking so much time and mostly did Wrong Decisions always. After DRS technology now Cricket Safe from Worst Decisions.
Darrell Hare gave Tendulkar out on 99 when the ball bounced off his shoulder into the wkeep's gloves and Hare raised his finger in a Lord's India-England test. I forget the year. Novelist Jeffrey Archer faced Hare at lunch and famously told him, " We came to witness a historic century by Tendulkar, not to watch your bloody-minded umpiring!" A few months later, Hare was black listed.
Where r s k bansal rudi koertzen dharmasena aleem dar Russel tiffin n asoka desilva n marais erasmus,they have made the worst decisions a human eye could ever make
Instead of so much filters and sorting just get all the Steve Bucknors umpiring decisions to Sachin Tendulkar.. I'm sure not even one will be fair 🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️
You give me ball tracking on number 2 (Warne, LBW, WI player not offering a shot) and it's hitting the stumps. Doesnt have to be in line if he's just padding it away. Can see why Bucknor gave that one out.
some of them are so clearly not out that its"suspicous"and as such match fixing comes into the equation the 4 wides were leg byes number 2 is the only one out of the 10 that i'm not sure about his first leg was obviously well wide of the stumps(when the ball having not made contact with the bat in any way whatsoever)hit it.but the ball then went off his shoe(that was well wide of the stumps)and across and onto his other leg which was placed almost in front of the stumps because of the somewhat complex nature of the incident it should have been looked by a third umpire if they can do it with lbw decisons then they can do it with this.......
10. Difficult one for the umpire as Yuvraj's wrist action implied that he missed it, and it went quickly and there was a lot of noise. Probably should have been called correctly, but not a horrible miss. Sympathy for the batsman because this wasn't a lucky edge, he genuinely hit it. 9. Prior to DRS giving something like this not out was completely unremarkable. Big step forward by the batsman. The ball hit the pad very shortly after coming off the pitch. Very hard to be confident on where the ball was going. Umpires are better trained these days. 8. These are classically difficult and controversial to call. The English players genuinely thought it was an edge. However the umpire had a good view of it, much better than the umpire at square leg. He should have a better feel for it than he did, and I would have to rate the decision as poor. 7. Very poor decision. Unsure why the umpire thought this was not out. Perhaps he thought it off the pad. 6. Shocking decision. Pitched way outside leg stump, and probably wasn't going to hit the wickets. 5. Complete shocker. The umpire got penalised for this one. 4. Brain fart. Even if it hadn't hit is legs, it's gone between them, and if he hadn't moved his legs it would have hit them. 3. Terrible decision. Clearly no where near the ball, and the batsman didn't even really play at it. Even if there was a sound it's still not remotely acceptable. 2. Needs to be assessed in the context of the play. If the batsman had been consistently doing that by blocking the ball with his pads and not playing a shot then the umpire is quite right to give one of them out. Even if it was a one off block with the pads it wasn't a terrible decision, though probably not a good one, but then again it might have been a good one as it is difficult to assess from the video whether or not the ball would hit the stumps. Pre DRS bowlers were often given the benefit of the doubt when batsmen were padding up this way. Zero sympathy for the batsman, completely unethical play. This is not a decision that an umpire should receive too much criticism over. 1. Complete shocker. Even the Pakistani players seem stunned.
Wasim, Inzi, nobody's celebrating because they know the absurdity of the decision. That's how you react when you know the opposition was done wrong, not proud of that wicket
A few things stood out for me: I half expected all of them to be Indian batsmen The last one - I have a different word for that - rhymes with beating The Jayasuriya one I don’t think belonged in this list; it wasn’t as egregious and would have been a hard call to make. Why not Broad middling the ball to first slip in the list?
The warne lbw? How many lefties did he bowl from that exact spot? More than a couple. It was going on to hit the stumps i think. No shot and its gonna probably hit offered you HAVE to give it.
If this video did not include the famous 2008 Sydney test of Bharat Vs Australia where upmpires had given around 10 incorrect decision then i would very poor research on video creation
Bucknor is such an a******. I would still give some grace to other umpires but bucknor used to give wrong decisions purposely.. i don't understand even after so many wrong decisions by him, why the hell he wasn't removed.. looks like he has some connections
Surprised Steve Bucknor is only featured once here. I was expecting at least 8 appearances
same here ahahah
I expected all 10
Indian fans still mad about that Aus series in 2008, this video is some REAL perspective that he wasn't that bad
@@IzinTheBzin Ouch some western nigga is butthurt and has special place for Indians in his heart
Because of Steve Buckner we are having DRS system in cricket
Steve Buckner is the worst umpire compared with all umpires
Right India ka sath to khas
Don't forget Billy Bowden.
Not as bad as the worst ever umpire Shakor Rana
Acha hua sala buckner mar gaya nahi to usne kitno ka carrire tabaah kar diya tha..
At the same time, aus and pak players worst cheating players
Steve be like: I am always willing to give out Sachin
😔
Where there is will there is a way
Where there is a Steve, Sachin is out.
@@yatinawaal6682 😀😀
The fact that all 10 are not Steve Bucknor decisions automatically proves that these cannot be the worst 10.
ndian fans still mad about that Aus series in 2008, this video is some REAL perspective that he wasn't that bad
@@IzinTheBzin Ouch some western nigga is butthurt and has special place for Indians in his heart
indian hypocrite, millions of them
All I learned is if you play against Sri Lanka umpire will be blind
Steve bucknor had no eyes.. Thats why he wore black glasses always
Love it !
Number 2, the Shane Warne one is out. Not offering a shot so it doesn’t have to pitch in line or hit in line with the stumps and looked like it was going onto the stumps.
yes that was a seriously goood bowling
The issue is, there is no way you can predict that going on to hit the stumps. There was so much doubt you can't possibly give that out other than complete guess work.
It "probably" would have hit the stumps in fairness to Bucknor, but no way could he be "sure". That said, serves the batsman right. He's got bat in his hands, use it! Personally I've never had a problem with the bowler getting the benefit of the doubt when the batsman pads up. Speaking as a former bowler of course!
The two decisions given by the third umpires - the run out by Kalu and the catch by Inzi were not umpire mistakes. They were basically match fixing.. period
❤❤❤
Not really
Desilva was out brother ball hit inzi trouser and not the ground I remember that match
@@muhammadfaisalmaqsood are u mad
@@ramangarg9990 sir I am telling you what was told in that match in the commentary after that decision ... Please watch full match highlights .. because it was criticized straight away
I can sorta understand the Keith Arthurton one. No shot offered, and to me the ball is gonna come back just enough. But the rest are terrible
😔
#2 wasn’t that bad. Arthurton had a Bat and didn’t use it. Little Sympathy!
You can't guess the benefit goes to the batsmen unless the umpire goes out of his way to give batsmen out because he wants to.
Agreed. That would have been very close. Especially when you consider Warne used to bowl batsman from that delivery quite regularly. He could turn the ball that far and hit the stumps.
It should not have been on this list, let alone number 2.
@@karannagodsuriya8535 Every LBW decision is a guess. No shot offered, and with the ball turning big; that looked like it was hitting the stumps to me. There's nothing wrong with the decision made there.
How can the 3rd umpires still give them out?? With the benefit of replays??
Bookies work in mysterious ways.
Amazing that Flintoff meekly walked after that bizarre decision. Knowing him, one would have expected him to raise at least an eyebrow in protest.
As for the last one (Arvinda's), I think that called for a bit of sportsmanship from the fielder. 🙄
Definitely 😌
that was OUT, watch full match highlights. it hit Inzi's trousers and as per laws of cricket kit is considered as part of player's body.
@@ZarbakhtAliKhan Typical Pakistani defending it 😂 brother clearly it touched the ground have some shame
@@AnshDoshi19265 Typical and sheer ignorance just go and watch full match highlights. Have the guts to test your comment.
@@ZarbakhtAliKhan I have watched it before 🤡
6, 5 and 3 were poor umpiring calls. No 1 was abysmal by the fielder who will have known they dropped the ball and still appealed. The others were before there was a chance to review decisions. In fact it was these kind of dismissals that reviews were brought in to be able to ensure the right one is made.
No. 3 looked out in real time. There was also a sound which the umpire assumed was the ball touching the bat.
Plus, the bowling team appealed like hell.
appeal or no appeal no 1 was given out after umpire referring to third umpire you can look in the end even fielder was amazed at the decision
If you look closely at number one it actually hits his pants when he dropped it and then collects it so I say fair catch
Number 10 was rubbish umpiring
England audience when England team get bad umpiring “ boooo” but when other team undergo bad umpiring “yeaaaah”
Well ofc bcs they support England 😂
I'm surprised Justin Langer's non dismissal in Hobart in '99 wasn't on here. He smashed the cover off it and went on to score a century.
Bucknor was the worst umpire the game has ever seen. And wrong decisions despite the technology should ban those umpires for ever.
ndian fans still mad about that Aus series in 2008, this video is some REAL perspective that he wasn't that bad
Umpires like steve buckner are the reason that review system is introduced
😌
steve buckner is the dirtiest umpire in cricket history
Parore and Inzimam cheated.
The Warne one would have hit the stumps and was therefore out.
But impact is very much outside off stump. So he was not out.
@@mangeshmahurkar6642 doesn’t matter if you don’t play a shot 🤷🏼♂️ Check the laws of the game.
But I’d contend that there’s no way that was spinning back enough to hit the stumps when you consider how wide of off stump it pitched from a right arm bowler coming over the wicket and not bowling from particularly close to the stumps either. I know Warne spun the ball a lot, especially out of the rough, but not THAT much.
@@davidburke2132 in 2017 Australia tour of India, in 2nd test, shaun marsh will remains not out, even using the DRS. Shaun marsh offered no shot. So impact is important.
@@mangeshmahurkar6642 please, just read the laws of the game. Impact outside the line of off stump only protects a batter from LBW dismissal if playing a shot. It’s there in black and white in the rules. I’m not familiar with the case you mention, and if it’s as you briefly describe then it sounds like another umpiring error, and the rules aren’t based on umpiring errors, so I’ll just repeat again… read the rules.
@@mangeshmahurkar6642
No shot played. So can pitch outside off and still be lbw.
Shakoor Rana was the worst Umpire in the world history. He used to openly cheat in favour of pakistan .. His many LBWs decisions were quite controversial
As Mike Gatting discovered to his cost....
I used to umpire park level cricket. This guy's gone for a glance down leg side, and as far as I saw missed it by as much as Flintoff did his. But there was a noticeable noise.Not surprisingly the fielding side went up and I said not out. Which they weren't happy about. But I was sure he didn't hit it and the noise wasn't woody. Found out later it was the rubber grip on his bat that he had rolled down unrolling and popping back into place with a snap. The fella ended up making a ton, too his first every, so he was pretty happy.
💗💗💗
Number 9 is right decision broo...
Yaa, Sometimes it might be umpire calls.
Superb
Next part
Some times in our real life we too suffer from these kind of persons
😔😔😔
At no 1 . Desilva was out. I remember that match ... He was declared out because the ball hit inizimam's trouser and not the ground.. his trouser was between ball and ground
Yaa I think so too
Right
He dropped it. Not out.
Absolutely not out...
Thank god we have drs and reviews
You didn't include the two in a row where McGraths LBWs against Inzamam ul Haq were ignored on a day where now LBWs were given???? Wow!
I'm pretty sure Ricky Ponting got howler in his first innings of his first test match and was out for 96
Thus robbing him of a century on debut love Anthony Fed ex lol
It's Ponting, the biggest whinger in cricket, so I'm glad he didn't get his century.
And thus we have DRS.
I think it's one technology that's helped the most.
@@SharjeelSahibzada Even DRS would have kept no. 2 out if hawk eye showed the ball swinging enough to hit the stumps.
Nice collection.
Thank goodness for replay challenges. They're not 100% accurate but better than relying on half blind old men.
❤
4:04 what the hell did he say to ponting to make him understand that wide ball
Steve buckner was the inventor of Drs
😂😂😂
It would help if players didnt constantly appeal when it is obviously not out
If you go frame by frame on the last one, the ball lands in a fold in his pants, it looks like it might not actually make direct contact with the ground. Would be interesting to see what the rules state if that is indeed the case
It hit the ground mate.
9th one was fun to watch 😂
That decision to give Flintoff out was absolutely horrendous.
I have seen few more run outs like that from Sri Lankan umpires back in 90s.
Why is #2 a bad mistake? It can be out - but it's not a horrible one at all
Worst was Andrew flintoff's decision
😔
Shane Warne wicket is no less than blunder
Number 1 looks like it bounced on his pants.. So it's out?
How was Stuart Broad smashing it to slip not on this list? Inzi cheating is nothing new.
You can make Top 10 wrong decisions against Sachin by Steve
I will try it ❤
Gr8 effort to camouflage the ball by inzy
❤
Those umpires who gave faulty outs were in hurry to complete the match and go back home soon
😂😂😂
Steve buckner was the king of Worst umpire. He was taking so much time and mostly did Wrong Decisions always. After DRS technology now Cricket Safe from Worst Decisions.
❤😌
Darrell Hare gave Tendulkar out on 99 when the ball bounced off his shoulder into the wkeep's gloves and Hare raised his finger in a Lord's India-England test. I forget the year. Novelist Jeffrey Archer faced Hare at lunch and famously told him, " We came to witness a historic century by Tendulkar, not to watch your bloody-minded umpiring!"
A few months later, Hare was black listed.
Where r s k bansal rudi koertzen dharmasena aleem dar Russel tiffin n asoka desilva n marais erasmus,they have made the worst decisions a human eye could ever make
Instead of so much filters and sorting just get all the Steve Bucknors umpiring decisions to Sachin Tendulkar.. I'm sure not even one will be fair 🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️
😭😭 cry me a river 😭😭
@@davidgraham8299 🤣🤣 hope u are not any relative of that stupid fellow Bucknor
@@davidgraham8299 British dog butthurt 😂😂
DRS has brought a significant revolution in cricket world
Steve Buckner never digest the success of Sachin Tendulkar.. he always hate Sachin and eager to give out without thinking.
The last one with inzamam..the ball actually didn't hit the ground, it bounced off the pants.. interesting
Stuart broad vs Australia when he smacked it straight to slip and given not out
The Gilchrist one makes me laugh. Why would he walk when he gets a bad decision against him nobody calls him back.
😔
Steve bukner is wrost umpire of cricket history
0:17 the way dhoni turn says all
Even Akram was shocked with that decision at @6:09
Not decisions !!!! You must term as Cheating by umpires b!!!
Everyone makes mistakes. It's not cheating.
You give me ball tracking on number 2 (Warne, LBW, WI player not offering a shot) and it's hitting the stumps. Doesnt have to be in line if he's just padding it away. Can see why Bucknor gave that one out.
some of them are so clearly not out that its"suspicous"and as such match fixing comes into the equation the 4 wides were leg byes number 2 is the only one out of the 10 that i'm not sure about his first leg was obviously well wide of the stumps(when the ball having not made contact with the bat in any way whatsoever)hit it.but the ball then went off his shoe(that was well wide of the stumps)and across and onto his other leg which was placed almost in front of the stumps because of the somewhat complex nature of the incident it should have been looked by a third umpire if they can do it with lbw decisons then they can do it with this.......
Umpire Decision review system most useful at this moment.
Steve bucknor was a disgrace as an umpire
Umpire GOAT s - Steve Bucknor and Darrell Hair 😂
Ironically the steve bucknor decision at 2 might be the most justfiable one, no shot played and who knows how much warne was spinning that
Even Inzi and Akram was shocked how it was given out
😥
10. Difficult one for the umpire as Yuvraj's wrist action implied that he missed it, and it went quickly and there was a lot of noise. Probably should have been called correctly, but not a horrible miss. Sympathy for the batsman because this wasn't a lucky edge, he genuinely hit it.
9. Prior to DRS giving something like this not out was completely unremarkable. Big step forward by the batsman. The ball hit the pad very shortly after coming off the pitch. Very hard to be confident on where the ball was going. Umpires are better trained these days.
8. These are classically difficult and controversial to call. The English players genuinely thought it was an edge. However the umpire had a good view of it, much better than the umpire at square leg. He should have a better feel for it than he did, and I would have to rate the decision as poor.
7. Very poor decision. Unsure why the umpire thought this was not out. Perhaps he thought it off the pad.
6. Shocking decision. Pitched way outside leg stump, and probably wasn't going to hit the wickets.
5. Complete shocker. The umpire got penalised for this one.
4. Brain fart. Even if it hadn't hit is legs, it's gone between them, and if he hadn't moved his legs it would have hit them.
3. Terrible decision. Clearly no where near the ball, and the batsman didn't even really play at it. Even if there was a sound it's still not remotely acceptable.
2. Needs to be assessed in the context of the play. If the batsman had been consistently doing that by blocking the ball with his pads and not playing a shot then the umpire is quite right to give one of them out. Even if it was a one off block with the pads it wasn't a terrible decision, though probably not a good one, but then again it might have been a good one as it is difficult to assess from the video whether or not the ball would hit the stumps. Pre DRS bowlers were often given the benefit of the doubt when batsmen were padding up this way. Zero sympathy for the batsman, completely unethical play. This is not a decision that an umpire should receive too much criticism over.
1. Complete shocker. Even the Pakistani players seem stunned.
And this is why DRS was introduced but there's also the problem of players using it wastefully.
Wasim, Inzi, nobody's celebrating because they know the absurdity of the decision. That's how you react when you know the opposition was done wrong, not proud of that wicket
Definitely ❤❤❤
A few things stood out for me:
I half expected all of them to be Indian batsmen
The last one - I have a different word for that - rhymes with beating
The Jayasuriya one I don’t think belonged in this list; it wasn’t as egregious and would have been a hard call to make.
Why not Broad middling the ball to first slip in the list?
Its funny how many batsmen stand around--the umpire's decision was final(pre DRS)
😌😌😌
All those saying that Bucknor was the worst umpire obviously didn't see enough of Merv Kitchen in his latter years.
Same mold Merve must have been watching Bucknor to sharpen his skills.
My first competitive game, my first competitive innings, I was given out caught behind by a ball that clipped the top of my pad.
Even Tv umpires were drunk😂😂
🤦♀️😬😃
Why is the Warne one at #2 a bad decision? He didn’t play a shot and that would be smashing into middle stump. That’s a superb decision.
Impact outside stump 😉
@@faizanahmedsiddique9675doesn’t need to impact in line if no shot was offered 😉
This would be the 10 worst in the television era, as opposed to 'ever'.
3:38 best of all
❤
Glad we have DRS. Umpires were given too much importance in the past!
❤❤❤
Don’t know why we even bother with having a square leg out there. Use three umpires in a team and just rotate then through so they’re well rested
Pathetic. What makes it worse is that none of those umpires ever got docked their match fee as a fine!
Steve Buckner's decisions against India has been missing in the video
I Will upload another video about Steve Buckner's worst decisions ..
What is the background music called
Hahaha ...venkatraghvan was drunk at that time....worst decision
Steve buckner father of DRS🔥👍
😌😌😌
2nd number decision by Steve Buckner can be right as no shot was offered by player and rules says in this case impact doesn’t matter
With the onset of gambling in cricket maybe the umpires should be investigated there have been to many suspicious decisions
In the days of home umpires for tests, there were plenty of these in Australia.
Darryl Hair was the leader in this!!!
Why ICC given him chance and chance again to repeat worst Umpiring.
Some time player r cheater as shown dropped catch n appeals
Other team player's watching n not responding.
😃
The second one Warne took lbw was correct decision, pitching outside of offstump and hitting the wickets considered in lbw
#1
Third umpire: the fell out of his hand
Umpire: So it is out
The warne lbw? How many lefties did he bowl from that exact spot? More than a couple. It was going on to hit the stumps i think. No shot and its gonna probably hit offered you HAVE to give it.
Crazy all of them, too many sleeping pills these umps are on.😂
Almost every umpiring decision by Indian umpires before the introduction of neutral umpire should count as the worst ever.
I never liked venkat raghvan's attitude. He was always over confident with bad judgements and casual body language
❤️❤️❤️
Yesterday also h.pandya out 🤔 I think that is not out 👻
Yaa I think so too..it's not out
Steve bucknor overtook khizar hayat, shakoor rana, mian aslam, darryl hair in biased umpiring
1 and 2 are correct but 3 and 4 were horrible!
❤
J'surya was out in gully cricket. One tip one hand. 😂🤭. Oh boy he was livid.
Yes poor umpire decisions, but players appealing for what is clearly not out is just cheating
You know you made a bad call as an umpire if the appealing team also looks nervous after your decision
❤️❤️❤️
If this video did not include the famous 2008 Sydney test of Bharat Vs Australia where upmpires had given around 10 incorrect decision then i would very poor research on video creation
In PE, South Africa, we get bad umpire decisions like these multiple times in every club and social league match played.
Bucknor is such an a******. I would still give some grace to other umpires but bucknor used to give wrong decisions purposely.. i don't understand even after so many wrong decisions by him, why the hell he wasn't removed.. looks like he has some connections
Definitely
The last one - Even the Pakistanis couldn't believe it was given out 😂.