8 Tennis Records That Will NEVER Be Broken Again!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 окт 2022
- Subscribe for more great tennis content! 👇 👇
/ @tennisticproductions
/ @tennisticproductions
Follow me on social media!
Instagram 👉🏼 / tennisticpr. .
Twitter 👉🏼 / tennisticyt
Contact: Tennisticproductions@gmail.com
Djokovic's 16.950 atp points, 4 GS in a row on 3 different surfaces, Nadal FO wins, Federer's 237 consecutive weeks are quite unreal.
And maybe feds 5 consecutive second half dominations: 5 Wimbledon Us Open doubles, many atp finals wins etc.
Alcaraz will break the points record
@@BIG_Z19905 he needs to improve his consistency at different events.
@@BIG_Z19905 no chance .
Djoko’s 16950 points can actually be broken , but will be broken by himself again if he can keep the momentum on next year 🚬
Djokovic winning every big tournament (GS + ATP finals +masters) at least twice is the most impressive achievement in the world of tennis. Shows how complete of a player he actually is.
But he didn’t win the Olympics which is a big tournament
@@dewman7477 Olympics are a separate event, not part of usual tennis calendar. No ATP points are awarded for winning Olympics.
@@basileusbasileus9346 it’s still a significant tournament for any athlete to win though regardless
@@dewman7477 He only played it 3 times..and he got to one final. It's not as big a deal when it's played so infrequently.
@@joemarshall4226 he never made gold medal final only semifinal or bronze medal match. And that’s what made it impressive for Nadal to win 1 gold medal and Murray to win 2 gold medals it’s a rare once in every 4 years event so the gold medal is very hard to win
I think that Djokovic's achievement, winning all 9 masters, all 4 GS and ATP finals at least twice unbeatable record!
At least three times,Novak won all 4GS three times each
16950 points shows absolute dominance. when you understand, it happened in the era of Federer and Nadal. this is getting unbelievable
Yeah, even in 2022, Swiatek could not get that despite being clearly on her own league. 16950 points when there are 2 other all time greats (and Murray still there as a big challenger also) is impossible.
If it shows dominance how come he doesn't have the most slams?? how come 2 hard court slams a year & he has a total of 12 yet only 1 clay slam a year & Nadal has 14?? based on his "dominance he should have double the hard court slams 28 to Nadals' clay slams of 14...but he doesnt'...combine clay & hard court slams...Nadal has 20 & Novax 14.... We can see who really is the dominant player...
@@jmilne5751 Novak is goat..Just acept that and move on
@@madmax-nz2xh accept Nadal is GOAT & move on...
@@jmilne5751 dw lets watch next season saying goodbye to nadal
I would put Isner-Mahut as No.1 or No.2.
Also, I think djokovics 9 AO titles (with a perfect record in finals) are one of the most underestimated records. Probably only because rafa has 14 FO, nobody talks about how insane 9 AO titles are.
Fed has 8 wim
This is not a top 8 records list. Just 8 records.
Of course they won't talk about ND 9 wins from 9 finals...He has suffered more losses there compared to Nadal at RG has been pushed numerous times to 5 sets, whereas Nadal has played I believe only 3 5 set matches....So it is NOT worthy of a mention at all.
@@jmilne5751 Note that Nadal 3 losses at Roland Garos are constituted from 1 Soderling and 2 (TWO!) Djokovic, whilst Nadal never defeated Djokovic at Australian. If you look H2H at Roland Garos, Nadal leads Djokovic 8-2, while at Australian Open is 2-0 in Djok favor. Which only explains how consistent Djok was on Nadal's favorite GS and surface, he managed to go deep into the tournament quite often, while Nadal failed so many times to reach semis or finals at AO. Just shows how complete and all around player Djokovic is. Nadal's records at FO are ridiculous and will never be broken, but he is unarguably less complete player than Djok in every term. He always plays his game no matter the opponent and surface, he is one dimensional. He is beast, no question about it, but one dimensional beast. While Djokovic is much more complete and can adapt and change tactics, he is like a an AI that improves every time opponent improves, sometimes seems literally impossible to win against him, like a computer. Another proof is double career golden Masters, double career slam, non calendar slam, and 5 ATP finals, while nadal played 10 ATP finals, won 0, and also lacks 2 masters. Anyone who puts Nadal in front of Djokovic just because of his clay records is plain stupid, because tennis is not only clay. You have to play all three surfaces to be the best, you cannot just ignore 2 out of 3 and completely dominate 1 surface and call yourself a GOAT.
@@heavypeki It amazes me how much detail you forget to mention....Nadal loss to soderling was due to injury. An injury that kept him from Wimbledon. Look at the records that showed injuries to Nadal during majors...there are lots of them. You also forgot to mention that Nadal has more US Open majors than Djokovic on Djokovic favourite surface & even has 2-1 H2H at US Open to him...You forgot No Olympic gold for Djokovic, Nadal youngest to win 1st major, youngest to win all 4 slams, so stop sprouting that Djokovic is the better all round player... His stats ONLY look good because 2 of 4 majors are on hard & most ATP tournaments are on hard as well. If Djokovic was such an all round player & the GOAT he would have ALL the records...but he doesn't & yeah he is BEHIND Nadal H2H in Slam matches & finals....
Djokovic's 373 weeks at no. 1
THE PANDEMIC RANKING GIVEN AWAY DOZEN OF WEEKS, its a fake record
Nole will crush this record himself before he retires
@@evolvefromnow6735 agreed. No one else can 🔥
@@evolvefromnow6735 its not a record. WEEKS AT nº1 ARE NOT A TITLE, just decoration
@@compluto4190 😄
Kyrgios has the most unbreakable record in total fines and penalties
Are you sure that's not Johnny Mac?
@@SrbijaCG definitely. I came across that stat once 😂
It's more likely that it's Marat Safin with the most racquet smashes.
Illie Nastase made them look like Sunday school teachers.
Pretty that is the most easy to break record lol.... Unlike most other records here, smashing rackets, breaking stuffs and hurling vulgarities is something you have full control over.
Majority of these are held by the big 3 which speaks volumes of domination by them. However, the only record that seems ‘unbreakable’ to me is the 14 French Open one. Nobody has loved Nadal more than the court Philippe Chatrier. Federer’s 237 consecutive weeks is also the example of sheer dominance for straight 4-4 1/2 year. Djoko’s double career masters is also a specimen of its own. I mean to win all the masters twice speaks how many variety’s of gameplay that man has mastered. Simply Incredible!
5 US Open titles in a row is another one tough to achieve, considering that nobody was able to even defend his title since RF last won a US Open. Not even the djoker or Rafa were able to defend their US Open crowns in their absolute prime.
I also think that no one is touching #373 weeks at No.1
@@BG-mw5pt How about Lendl's record of 8 consecutive finals at the Open? That's almost as impressive.
What makes the Nadal record so astounding is that the French Open is really the toughest tournament to dominate, historically. Because the rallies are so much longer, and defense is so important, it tends to be won by younger guys, and it's easy for an outsider to grind his way through the mix. Michael Chang and Mats Wilander each won it at 17, for instance. Borg was barely 18.
@@sonicmoj1 RF consecutive weeks as no1 is also in no danger.
Djokovic’s achievement is made extraordinary not only because of each masters won at least twice, but also each big/elite tournament! He has won YEC 5 times, each slam also at least twice and so on! In other word all 14 ATP sanctioned tour level elite events won at least twice! When you put it into THAT context - it signifies this particular Novak’s achievement even more!
About Djokovic’s double golden masters, he also won all the slams and atp finals twice, making that record even more unbeatable. Also if he wins monte carlo and Cincinnati one more time which is quite possible (he won 2 of his last 3 tournaments in cincy), he would have the triple golden masters. Truly the most complete player!
Golden masters isn't a real term, it's a made up term by the cringe worthy Novax cult
@@bengray5013ATP say's different ruclips.net/video/C3DPYlkTFMM/видео.html
@@bengray5013 .... and then we are cringe
@@bengray5013 it is a real term go watch the highlights of 2018 cincy final
@@Zoran889 that means nothing. Atp call majors as grand slams even thought grand slam is the name for winning all four majors. You're clutching at straws 😂
People two decades ago: Sampras 14 slams are almost impossible to beat. Fast forward, and now Nadal has won 14… French opens.
THIS IS BRILLIANT!!
DJOKOVIC YOU'RE SIMPLY THE BEST!!
PETE SAMPRAS YOU WERE IN YOUR ERA.
APPRECIATE ALL OF YOU
AND WISH YOU BLESSINGS
INGRID.
I seriously doubt that any 2 players will meet h2h as many times as Djokovic and Nadal have met.
Maybe Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner can get close to that in the future.
I could see that happening, Though it's not likely.
Holding all 4 slams at the same time seems to be an underrated stat. Novak was the only player to do it in the modern era. I think this stat sometimes is forgotten about in this never-ending goat debate. I would put that higher than probably every achievement (except for slams total). If Novak ends up level or ahead on slams, then there is no statistical conversation to be had any more on this debate.
Until wada test him... Then it's bye bye records
I think that winning every Masters at least twice is more impressive than the slam records. Slams are five sets. and if you have better fitness, you have a huge advantage...like all the Big Four had. But it's easy to lose a three setter, if you run into a player who is in the zone....an Isner or a Karlovic, for instance. But Djoker won them all...and he won them twice. Everyone is trying to win the Masters just as hard as they are trying to win slams, but no one has come close to a single Masters sweep, never mind a double.....
@@bengray5013 you're mixing up Djokovic with Nadal 🤫
@@leonkozma9148 no I'm not. Wada already said they don't agree with Novax use of hyperbaric chamber and its well known that Novax has had outbursts on court at his team when he hasn't packed his secret drink bottles... Everyone knows he's on ped's.
Nadals done that twice the fuck are you on dude
Nole has the path of rocks..how he handles such a pressure that should also be counted as a record.. in 9 years Nadals hasn’t defeated him on hard courts or grass avoids him on these surfaces.. nole ❤️❤️❤️
Avoids him?wtf
It's called Ped's
@@danielepriori8483 m.ruclips.net/video/66XMLJIf6yU/видео.html
@@danielepriori8483 omg these rafans are outright delusional 😲 these guys cant even see and accept rafa dodges nole to maintain his h2h. Ridiculous... But they agree that rafa gets injured and withdraws conveniently. 🤦♂️
Watch this link to know how nadal avoids federer and nole on hard courts and grass🙏
How about double all GS, all Masters and Year End Finals?
Boris Becker was also only 17 when he won his first slam at Wimbledon.
Actually, in the Isner-Mahut match, they made only 50 unforced errors each! And that's just insane
That's what makes that match actually compelling. If it was a comedy of errors on both sides it would be one thing, but it was actually a high quality match.
That's because they had so few rallies. It was just serve, serve, serve or serve-winner, serve-winner
I remember Federer going a set and a half in the US open without a single unforced error will likely never see that broken either. It was 109pts without a single unforced error.
@@mattsavage9960 He won those sets 6-4 and 6-2. It's really not such a big deal. HE was playing Isner, and between the two of them, there were service winners all over the place. Is ner tried to hit a winner any time he got a neutral ball, so he either lost the point by missing, or won it by hitting a winner, which is not an unforced error.
This is not an impressive record, i cringe everytime people praise this match,
Great list but you missed a record that undeniably belongs here, which is Djokovic being ranked World #1 for 373 weeks.
Djokovic will brake that record in the future
Djokovic will brake that record in the future
Now it's 409
i think federer's 1526 matches played without a single retirement is also unbreakable... to reach that many matches played is already very hard... but to never retire in any match once it started is unreal...
Bravo, from Novak Djokovic fan. Amazing achievement that is.
This
Federer retired. So, he has 1 retirement.
hehehe why he will retire for no reason?
Yes this is Great...
Great video! I would have loved to hear you mention who was 2nd in each record, to have a reference and in some cases, to be even more amazed by such unachievable feats. Cheers!
1) Vilas: 681 Match wins on Clay
2) Nadal 892+ consecutive weeks in the top 10.
With Djokovic speed and technique...it will truly pound your heart😊🇵🇭👍👍😉
You forgot about Rod Laver's record of winning all the slams twice. I know it was in a era where most of the slams were played on grass, but It's still an impressive record that lasted for like 50 years.
that record has been broken tho, by novak and nadal
@@GallantNite nope, Laver won the calendar grand slam twice, only Steffi Graff has done the calendar grand slam in the open era
@@GallantNite not broken they equalled it
But Laver won his first calendar year slam when the games were amateur, and the admitted (by Laver) best players in the world were not allowed to compete because they were pros.....Pancho Gonzales and Lew Hoad both dominated Rod when he toured with them for a year after winning his first sla. Ken Rosewall also topped him at first Rod said, "It's nice to know where you really stand in the world." So that record is not so great.
@@joemarshall4226 What about the 2nd calendar slam ? Just FYI, it's sufficient to say Grand Slam no need to say Calendar Year Slam. One AO, RG, W or USO would be called a Grand Slam Title.
I will add two more, Djokovic 7 time finishing year as n1 and most weeks on n1 position probalbly 400+weeks will be
7 time will definitely be broken, can’t say for the other one
Novak’s records can all be taken in a very weak era... the only impossible record of the sport is rafas 14 FOs.
Weeks at no.1 probs not
But 7year end number one can still be broken lol, that's possible for rafa to do
@@tennis-man1902 For Rafa? I mean only if Nole retires tommorow 😂
@@aleksa4924 Not even then, Rafa doesn’t care about it. He’s ended this season even though he could easily take year end . This record is unattainable for someone with so many injury concerns like Rafa . One of Novak’s best qualities is his durability . Other than 2017 he hasn’t missed many GS chances at all, that’s where he gained the edge over Rafa . Novak’s style of play will probably give him another 4-5 years easily
Nadal - RG and Monte Carlo (11,8) records
Djokovic - Masters 1000 records, season 2015 stats (6/8+3/4+WTF)
Rafa weeks consecutive in Top 10 (also weeks in Top 2). There's a lot of rankings stats by the big three that will be almost impossible to break
It's amazing, considering he had long amounts of time off with injuries....
@@joemarshall4226 because he always won RG
Federer's 24 consecutive tournament finals won from 2003 Vienna Open to 2005 Thailand Open seems unreachable too.
Dayumm , Robin Soderling was a giant killer at RG. Beat Nadal to stop Nadal from having 5 RG in a row and possibly 10 as Nadal won the next 5 after RG titles after that loss and Soderling ALSO stopped Fderer's 23 SF in a Grand Slam appearance in a row?! Trippy man.
Nadal's 891 consecutive weeks in the top 10 is mind blowing.
Yeah, and it go well into the 900s. This will NEVER be broken.
Nadal never won in year end ATP finals that's super record
I wonder how many players even have that many weeks in their professional careers with any ranking. 10 maybe? Nadal does this while staying at top 10, consecutively.
@@santaklaus11 it will be 900 at the end of the year. Federer has 968 but not consecutive. If Nadal plays another two years he may pass 968.
What's his top 5 consecutive record?
27 Grand Slam match winning in a row, the same calendar year ! In 1969, Rod Laver did 26 when he won the only Grand Slam of the Open Era.
If Djokovic can win one more RG he'll be the only ATP player ever with a 3x career slam. He is also two Masters titles away from a 3x Golden Masters (missing a 3rd Monte Carlo & a 3rd Cincinnati)
Not possible until nadal lives
@@adityaiyer3172 Nadal was alive even before when Novak won them ,
@@draganpaunovic5596 luck lol
Novak is too old to win another French Open.
@@adityaiyer3172 luck stick to cricket indian idli boy
Hello ! Great video ! Small question as I also started making videos, how do you not have any complaints about the videos you use to illustrate yours?
Thank you very much for the answer!
I’m pretty sure that Djokovic’s double Elite Title sweep will be extraordinary hard to ever match, not to mention better! And he is 1 MC, 1 RG and 1 Cinci title away from his 3rd!! Will be hard to do, but not impossible…it’s been a while since he was successful at MC tournament, so i’d imagine this would be hardest of the three to collect again as he pretty much “forgot how to win” there…but i can see another french and another Cinci somewhere down the road…
Honorable Mention: Roger Federer's 10 consecutive Grand Slam finals
Could you, please, elaborate on how you came up with 53 matches win-streak for Borg? According to my data, the longest winning streak in Open Era belongs to Guillermo Vilas - 46 matches. Borg shares 5-6 place with Federer - 41 match each. Also you did not mention the real reason the streaks are harder nowadays. The structure of the tour does not allow to play lesser tournaments in big successions, because on the week when masters are held, there is no other tournaments (just like with Slams). It was different in Borg's time and players had more choices in where to play.
The best players also faced off against each other much less frequently
16950 ATP points...81 Consecutive wins on clay, ATP masters won twice are just unreal......one more to Add is Rafa being in the top 10 since 2005 these are unbeatable
Federer's consecutive GS finals (he has first and second place) and/or winning 2 majors 5 consecutive years (Wimbledon and US Open) should definitely be on the list.
I don't understand why some people think that the number of QF SF F in any tournaments is an important record. Titles are important in tennis, I guess one GS title is more important than 5 finals. I will not say that it is easy to achieve such things, but that record is not even in the top 10...
Andre Vacherot (17 years, 30 days) 1894 Roland Garros
Michael Chang (17 years, 95 days) 1988 Roland Garros
i guess he meant in professional era
I think Michael Chang's youngest GS male singles champion should be on this list. Winning a slam at 17 years and 109 days is quite impressive to say the least. There are hardly any players this young who even manage to get in the main draw of the slams these days.
Becker also won Wimbledon with 17
@@Smileater You're right. Chang was a few months younger though.
Djokovic has actually in one moment 16975 points 😉
Isn't it 16970?,
@@NopeP It could be so. I only know that it happened in the middle of the week because of some points from the Davis Cup and that it was not included in the official counting of the ATP list because they release a new list every Monday.
Love the pattern I´ve seen all my life: People saying ¨it will never be ... again¨ and some time after life proves them wrong.
Nadal's 14 French Open is insane and will never be broken. It is the best and rated top as clay court being the toughest, it tests a player's strength, agility and control.
Along with that he has the most match wins in any grand slam. That also will never be touched
Federer's 5 consecutive wins at Wimbledon & US Open almost at the same time. That's quite impossible to repeat .
Consecutive weeks at no1 by RF. Surprised that didn’t make the cut. But awesome vid!
Steffi's Golden Slam is possibly the hardest record to beat. You only get a chance every 4 years. Hard to even win a grand slam.
Added bonus if you're rival gets stabbed 👍
@@leonkozma9148 Actually, Steffi Graf achieved the Golden Slam in 1988 (she was 19 years old). That was 5 years before Monica Seles was stabbed.
golden slam can only be matched thou, not broken.
@@stevennorris7181 It can be broken with the Calendar Super Slam, which is a Golden Slam + the ATP Finals.
Nobody has ever done that.
@@andreazonin then let me add it will only be broken by calender super slam plus all masters 1000 win in a year
you could have mentioned andy murray’s record of most wins vs big 3 as roger has retired and the next gen hasn’t won many matches vs big 3 so this will never be broken
Winning 5 consecutive titles Wimbledon and US open. Super difficult to ever beat this record imo. I think it will stand longer than any of the ones you listed.
Another one: 237 consecutive weeks world Nr. 1
still Rogers consecutive semi finals record is totally insane.
I'm not a big ND fan but 2 Golden Masters is crazy. there is not one masters on grass tho but he has 7 wimbledon so probably he would have a grass masters also if there was one.
I was going to mention Roger's 5 back to back's - thanks. ;)
No doubt Novac is the most remarkable one among all these legendary players. Champion on court, a great human being, a real role model.
While I agree that Novak is remarkable champon and great human being, I will say that the most remarkable stat is Rafa's 14 RG.
@@Vaisin indeed... From the Novak's supporter.
Of course, one might question how he did it: strategy, in terms of not playing (that much) at other tournaments, devotion to one surface, etc. but the number itself is really staggering. Especially given the fact that most of the players never win a single GS.
To bad that Novak will not be able to do the same with AO. I mean, there is a chance 🙂 optimistically speaking, but in reality, not that much.
@@vladimirmarkovic4947 Rafa won 14 RG while also being able to win the other majors at least twice, he's really versatile player. Either way, I think the most versatile player is Novak, who won his 22nd GS.
How does Rafa do it on clay? It's his heavy topspin and his brutal resilience that gives him the edge.
I suppose you have to be a nadal fan to consider 16 950 points less important record than 14 wins on one slam
I don't think Djokovic's 10 AO titles record will be broken as well. Then there is Rafa's Monte Carlo and Barcelona titles as well.
One record will certainly not be broken. It will not happen again that the three greatest tennis players in history of the game play at the same time. And that lasted for more than a decade. They played each other about 150 time. Almost all their duels were in the finals or semi-finals. In the last 15 years, less than 10 GS have been won by other tennis players.
Alcaraz's record is near invincible because of what it required to happen. If circumstances were normal, it wouldn't have happened. But between Djokovic being banned, Nadal almost exclusively playing slams and winning them, and Wimbledon not having points, it set up crazy scenarios for world number 1. Look no further for proof than the fact that Casper Ruud could have become number one if he made the finals and lost as long as Alcaraz didn't make the final. To put into perspective how crazy that is, he would have been world number 1 without a single title in his entire career above ATP 250.
Ruud obviously would have won at least one GS to become No.1 so that's not entierly true. You can't just make up some hypotheticals that never happend this way and then say: look how crazy the scenarios have been.
@@radieschen79 he didn't have to win at least one slam to become number 1. He just had to make the final, which he did, and Alcaraz not make the final. So if he made the final and Tiafoe beat Alcaraz (which he was very close to doing) and then Tiafoe beat him in the final, he still would have been number 1 without a single title above 250.
@@loganflowers3133 Dude, you're just making up hypotheticals here. Tiafoe didn't beat Alcaraz, Alcaraz did make the final (obviously), so for Ruud becoming World No.1 he would have had to win a GS, which makes your claim obsolete, that he wouldn't have become World No.1 without any title above ATP 250.
Federer's 24 consecutive finals win gotta be here
Nadal 870 odd and counting weeks in the top 10 is also very hard to see anyone beating it, especially as he will stay in until at leat RG next year.
892
An impressive set of records for sure....
....Federer's consecutive weeks at #1 and Nadal's consecutive weeks in the top 10 make a nice top ten list of records that will be very hard to beat.
Fingers crossed that Djokovic can win those extra couple of Masters 1000 events so he can make it a triple Golden Masters record. 👍👍
What are statistics on who played the most finals in Grand Slams?
Big3 are insane
I think, below 2 also qualify
1) Once entered Top 10 in 2005, Nadal never left Top 10 (even for single day). Continous 17 years and continuing.
2) Nadal qualifying for number of ATP Finals
Borg's 53 match win record, Federer's consecutive Semis, Djokovic's twice Golden masters
Nadal's continous Top 10 are near impossible to break.
If Djokovic continues like now, he may break 14 times champion at a Slam.
1- Roger's 36 consecutive QF's, 2- He won 105 straight points without an unforced error in 2007 against Isner, 3- Never retired from a match due to injury!
Winning 105 straight points without an UFE is impossible. If you won 48 points in a row, you won two sets. If you won 72 points in a row you won three sets. I think you must mean that he PLAYED 105 points in a row without an UFE. Which is relatively easy against Isner, since he takes the racquet out of your hand with his big serve and first-strike forehand....so it's hard to make an UFE if you can barely touch the ball. AT the same time, if you can hit some pretty good serves and forehands yourself, like Roger clearly can, John is not going to return many, since he has the lowest break of serve rate in the ATP. Where was the match?
I think these are some of the least important records. In tennis, it's important how many titles you won, not how many QF SF F you played. I guess one title is more valuable than 5 semi-finals. That story about unforced errors, come on dude. Don't you have anything else left? Some of the minor records that are brought to the fore. Fed is the guy who made in total most UFE(more than Rafa and Novak).
He had less GS titles than these two, who cares how many semis or finals he play..
@@thenotorious2226 Well, as I said before, your whims aren't the only things that count. Finals and semifinals are obviously important to a thinking person who is trying to evaluate a player's career. If someone wins a title, then loses in the first round eight times, he should not be considered a better player than someone who got to the semifinals nine times in a row. Every win counts, and wins at Grand Slams, because they are worth more ranking points, and the competition is toughest, are extra special. One of the most amazing records in tennis history is Chris Evert's record of reaching at least the semifinals of every grand slam she played, except one when she had food poisoning, for 16 years!
@@joemarshall4226 Those records are nice, when you say it its impressive but nothing more that. I agree with you that some will probably never be brought down, but you can always get such records from players who play for 20 years at a high level. The records that makes you the greatest and separate you from others are titles and weeks at number one and i would say H2H with biggest rivals. Fed lost so many most important matches, believe me he will give all his semifinals togheter to win one more wimbledon or USO or Rg...
Novak still has time to achieve Triple Career Golden Master, and Career Grand Slams 3 times.
237 consecutive weeks at number 1 by Roger Federer, imposible to break it today and 10 consecutive Grand Slams finals by Federer
It is broken by Novak Djokovic
@@jugoslavnamljidjiu9021 no it's not... novak has the total weeks on no.1 but the most consecutive weeks at no.1 is still with Roger by a long shot, in fact the second place is held by Jimmy conners which is 160...
@@jugoslavnamljidjiu9021 He is talking about consecutive weeks as world number 1
@@marshaloga3047 I could see that being broken. If an Alcaraz type player came along, started young, and had no one outstanding competitior, 4 1/2 years at the top doesn't seem out of reach, as long as he can stay pretty healthy. I could see both Alcaraz or the Polish girl pull this off....not saying it's likely, but it's possible.....If Carlos was a little taller it would help....
@@marshaloga3047 You guys talk about that record like it's more important than the total number of weeks at number one which is nonsense..
i would also add novak's weeks as world no 1 (380+) and also 912 consecutive weeks of nadal being top-10 player
It's not hard to be No1 when the real No1 is denied 2 GS's, gets and an additional 2000 points stolen,even though he won.
Nadal's consecutive weeks at the Top 10 is also another unreal record.
I don't understand why anybody thought Sampras' 14 was unbreakable. He only broke the record by 2, and Sampras could not play on clay. It should have been very conceivable at the time that someone who could play on all 3 surfaces would break his record (Rafa and Novak are halfway to lapping Sampras for Pete's sake).
Borg didn't compete at the Australian and retired early. If it wasn't for that, Sampras doesn't even have the slam record. Whoever ends up with the record between Rafa and Novak will be unbreakable because there is a massive gap between the big 3 and everyone else. There has to be a gap for a record to be unbeatable.
Never say never except for the longest game as the Isner match led to a rule change.
So…everyone in the comment section is ignoring the fact that Nadal holds a record of 14 fricking grand slams on a single surface💀💀
It's in the video dude!
Andy Murray winning 2 gold single medals !
The only record here that will never be broken is isner and mahut's match length, unless they'll reverse the rules.
All this records can be broken despite the fact that the title says:
“8 Tennis Records That Will NEVER Be
Broken Again!”
They can be broken but they won't be.
Great collection. But as Vladimir pointed out, Federer's 237 is unthinkable to break as well.
If the weak period of tennis comes again, it is possible. For now, if Alcaraz continues to play like this and progress, and no strong competition appears, as was the case with Federer, he can easily break that record...
@@thenotorious2226 only time will tell
@@thenotorious2226 🤣
@@thenotorious2226 Guess who was playing professional tennis during Roger's 4 1/2 year reign? Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic. "no competition"
You forgot to mention the 23 grand slams and still going strong.
Borg winning strike and Djokovic winning strike cant compare.
Awesome Nole you still the champ
8 Wimbledons by Federer ( Djokovic has a chance to equal this record in my opinion but not to beat it)
9 Australian Open titles by Novak Djokovic
377 weeks at no. 1 by Steffi Graf
9 Wimbledons by Martina Navratilova
167 titles won by Navratilova
1442 matches won during the whole career by Navratilova
1651 matches played during the whole career by Navratilova
900 115 ( 88.7 percent) by Steffi Graf
103 ATP titles by Federer ( Novak has a slight chance to beat or equal that in my opinion but it will be hard. 20 to 30 percent chance I give him
22 GS titles by Nadal ( Novak got a shot at this to equal or surpass it)
23 GS by Serena Williams in Open era
11 Australian open titles by Margaret Court
Golden Slam by Steffi Graf
38 Masters 1000 titles by Novak Djokovic
12 Wimbledon finals by Federer
And of course 237 consecutive weeks at no. 1 by Federer
1251 matches won by Federer in whole career
1526 matches played in career by Federer in whole career ( 82 percent win )
Good luck with those records too
😘🥳
Nice!
the number 6 was broken by navratilova i think it was
Someone convert Roger's points in 2006-2007 season to the modern ATP ranking
Not even close. Because of the clay courts.
You Will get 16,740, which is still very close
You forgot 373. weeks on Number 1 by Novak Djokovic!
I think Djokovic can win 14 Australian Open, even after last year stopping him ! Nadal or any one never will be 373. weeks on No 1 again , for sure !
And 7. years No 1 at the end of year .
Hard to be broken yes but never nothing like that
Some records I don't think can be breakable (in addition to those reminded in the video):
Federer records - 5 consecutive titles in 2 Grand Slam tournaments; 237 consecutive weeks at No. 1; 10 consecutive Grand Slam finals; winning more than 100 matches in 2 different Grand Slams (unless science allows players to be feat till their fifties in the future) - the only one who can maybe break this record is Novak Djokovic.
Nadal records - 884 consecutive weeks (and counting) at the top 10; 8 consecutive titles in a single big title (Monte Carlo Masters in his case); 4 Grand Slam titles won without losing a set; winning a Grand Slam tournament 4 times before the first loss.
Djokovic records - holding all four majors and the ATP finals title at once; completing a full Career Grand Slam both in the 20s and the 30s; 6+ finals in every Grand Slam tournament; 6 masters titles in the same season (as well as 8 masters finals); top seed in 30 Grand Slam events (for now).
Andy Murray - 2 Olympic gold medals in singles.
These are just some of the records. Full Disclosure: I'm a Novak Djokovic fan.
Does any one know the pray in background?
The GOAT is great on all surfaces, for years. Only one man fits the description, Novak Djokovic.
I would say double masters only. Golden should only refer to Olympic gold medal
It doesnt sound as good tho
The time stamps are messed up
Regarding number 5, theoretically you can have even a single game that can last for hours…
Records are there to be broken
Alcaraz was youngest world number one by default.
I think Nadal's record will be the one that will never ever be beaten, simply because you have to win the event 15 times to beat his record (so far...).
Nadal 4 tournaments with 10+ titles is ridiculous
You have not discussed about Rod Laver the great . Calendar GS.
Fed winning his first 7 grand slam finals
Dont forget Novak's 3 consecutive sunshine doubles titles
You forgot some other important records:
891+ consecutive weeks in the top 10
Winning 2+ titles for 18 consecutive years.
Longest span between first and last grand slam (17 years)
All held by Nadal
Irrelevant records. That only shows that Roger and Novak had injuries for a longer period of time than Rafa.
@@MoistyHydration Rafa clearly has been injured for way longer than Novak and Roger and because of this he has less Grand Slam appearances than the other two but despite that he has the highest GS count
@@joshuathomas2012 Sure he has. He comes every season on clay to win Roland Garos, but as soon as the grass and Hardcourt season starts he's nowhere to be found or he is "injured" what a coincidence. Novak for the last 2 years Novak wasn't let to play on 4 grandslam tournaments (in which he was the favourite) and no-one points it out. Rafa lost every credibility of he's injury status. So many times he says "I'm not prepared, I'm still not felling that well" and procedes to play a insane level of tennis. Seriously who can believe that guy anymore?
@@MoistyHydration Excuse me but could you remind me the 4 grand slams he missed out on the past 2 years?
He missed AO and USO this year and played every GS the previous year. What are you talking about ?
@@joshuathomas2012 Wimbledon that has been cancelled and USO (harsh) disqualification.
Nobody said that anyone would ever beat Gretzky's goal scoring record either. But Ovechkin will do that before he retires. Never say never.
You just need one of big three to be reincarnated without the other two and you can have any of these records repeated or even beaten. I am almost certain I won't see this in my life of course. But never is a big word. I think we don't really understand how exceptional the last 20 years of tennis have been. Eisner-Mahut is however impossible by definition as I believe they put rules in place to avoid it.
Andy Murray's record of winning every big title in 2016
Olympics (🥇)
Grand Slam (x1)
ATP finals
Masters (x3)
500 (x3)
Djokovic has the highest record that can never be broken in the tennis world❤❤❤❤ that make him the greatest of all..
Can a wild card like Goran to win a Wimbledon grand slam?
Novak Records at Australian open 9 for 9💯💯💯💯💪💪
it is practically 10 from 10 ! Even 14, at that moment looked not impossibile!