This is unfortunately the problem with self-driving cars. If someone approaches the car and "attacks" you, you cannot just drive off which is what a human can do!
man, I wonder what's next for you Americans: bullet proof self driving cars? otherwise it's not safe enough? What a self destructive country you guys have there. You guys just cannot have what Japan has. hahaha
OK but that's kinda like if someone splashes paint on your windshield that cannot be wiped off by the wipers, then as a human driver you don't know what to do cos you can barely see anything. That's what the attacker is doing here basically--blinds the AI driver's ability to see.
It's always the humans that are the problem though, not the automated systems. The same thing can happen if a human is driving, right? And with worse outcomes.
Is just another problem... criminal intent should be a crime enforcer part of society eventually. Hence as said in above.. like paint attack to windshield does create a likely similar hinders.
Oh come on...nobody...especially criminals will break into cars through the car windows in SF/Oakland or anywhere in the bay area. And they definitely won't do that to steal your stuff in your car. That would be against the law :P
The question is why would you give up the control of a vehicle to an electronic entity ? and yes I mean entity....humans so ready to give up their sovereignty to IA,
Also think: "delegation". As when the human wants to sleep or do something more productive than driving a vehicle for that time period. Furthermore, this driverless technology can be integrated as a subsystem into a human's personal vehicle not just in AV taxis.
No one defends themselves here - they just politely cower. These machines are being tested and used as well - meanwhile the city is in shambles and people need jobs . Fancy .
San Francisco is the worst place to develop this technology. There are too many bicyclists and pedestrians here. I hate these with a passion. Theyre creepy surreal and promote antisocial behavior. They give me the willys. I will always prefer a professional driver taking me to appointments and for running errands. This preview of our future dystopian nightmare needs to take a hike.
You've never had a driverless car come towards you without stopping and it shows. You also don't live in the neighborhood that is disproportionately being used as the experiment location and it shows.
@@evelynwaugh4053 Elon Musk promised 8 years ago that Tesla will have Full Self Driving, and today they are nowhere close to delivering on that promise. They said the car will drive from LA to New York, door to door, automatically. What a J0ke.
Every car should have a driver. These "self driving" cars are not safe. Other cities have zero or very few traffic fatalities with basic things San Francisco and other cities in the US could be doing.
Cars in general are not safe. Some cities were able to reduce the deaths, but no large one got to zero over a full year. Looking at less severe accidents everyone is lightyears away, even in medium large cities are hundreds of accidents every day. Nobody reports about them because they are insanely common with human drivers. It can only get better if there are less tired, stressed, aggressive and drunk people in charge of heavy vehicles on public roads. Better strategy is shifting to more public transport and light vehicles like bicycles though.
Fake account because I don't want to get sued or anything. I worked for waymo for almost 2 years. they typically drive themselves. The cars are operated (for the most part) remotely, and we would only take over if the car gets "stuck". which happens quite frequently. Some do have drivers, but I digress. Usually we would just send roadside dispatch to have someone unstick the car back to the depot. this can take like 10-15 minutes, ive seen it happen. this isn't the only way to mess with these cars. we had learning modules on pedestrians laying in the road, protestors putting traffic cones in front of the cars, etc. There's some crazy stuff those cars will attempt to do on their own. If there is a safety event, whoever was watching the car (all cars are watched on a 1:1 ratio) should have immediately sent a LEO event, it auto notifies police. Depending on the police and waymo response time, someone made a big or even bigger whoopsie. This just after a waymo car hit a bicyclist a few days ago When cruze (waymo's main competitor) got suspended from operating in San Fran, I was amazed that Waymo was allowed to keep operating there.
Ok, I wasn't aware that Cruze was suspended in SF, what were the reasons they got sacked? Also how to one get "invited" to become a Waymo passenger? Do you need to make a certain amount of income or have connections?
Can a passenger override the system and take control? I would want that. The way life is, there are situations no one can predict, and I would want to be able to take charge and get myself to safety if possible! This also seems like a really cool job!
@@mrvini1998 I'd love to see that too. Let's all write letters to Waymo asking that they start a pilot program of driverless taxis in Brazil. I'll make the popcorn.
Robocars: We wanna test drive our cars for a few years Govt: OK go do it in the least populated county or state Robocars: Nooo! Not like that! We wanna do it in the most congested place in the US! Govt: ???
AI programs cannot be debugged. Nothing programmers can do. Verify for yourself. Neural networks (core of self driving cars, ) cannot be modified by any human being. Just coefficients, billions of them.
We probably will hit the bicycle too... Those are some aggressive cycling... But with 5g maybe all entity can have communication modul that will talk to eaach other on the road hence practically remmove these kinds of accidents?
sensors should be on the top of the car and there should be an option for passengers to be able to access and take control of the vehicle in case of emergency
If the bicyclist was obscured by the truck and couldn't be seen with all those sensors and cameras, how could a human without sensors or cameras have seen it?
This is an example of why driverless cars are simply a bad idea. I think the idea will eventually be abandoned. Technologists always want to push there little ideas. Look at how much effort they’ve put into trying to develop chatbots to replace employees. They’ve been trying for decades! And we still demand actual human employees.
I no longer feel hurt nor regret for not being accepted by Cruise or Waymo as a user of their driverless cars. Before all that, I just force myself to deal with the difficulties of finding parking. Driving for myself and offering complimentary rides to friends I trust remains a lot safer and more predictable than using Cruise or Waymo. Now, I'm just so glad I made the decision to just drive my own car.
I won’t be blaming Waymo for hitting the cyclist looks like it was their fault, doing what everyone else does in cars, which is tailgate someone literally 0.1 seconds away from the car which is just loony.
Most if not all of these problems wouldn't happen if they would just put an employee in the car as a ride along. This should have been required from day 1 but apparently they paid off SF officials to use the city streets as a test track.
2:22 that’s so cool homeless people can identify what way no is, where the sensors are but still in spite of the sabotage waymo still keeps sending him obtrusive thoughts. Bike riders are often homeless so yeah it could have been worse😂
Self driving will be taking over in a way that very few people will drive cars in the future. Like how cars replaced riding horses. It’s making incremental improvements but it will get there.
On Feb 10 (Chinese new year) a waymo decided to drive into Chinatown in San Francisco - It was full of people celebrating and the vehicle stopped - the “revelers” broke the windows threw in fireworks and burned the vehicle to the ground; even though the doors are locked it would be trivial for somebody to break a window and set the car on fire - if I were in control of the car I could at least speed away here you’re trapped do you really want to get out of the vehicle when the people who just attacked it and tried to burn it to the ground are standing right there? Talk about a recipe for disaster.
Don't you know computers can never be wrong because they're considered a higher intelligence ? That presumption of perfection however is rebutted by the examples of confusion they show in ambiguous situations . Such as the Arizona death of a bicyclist walking his bike which made him a pedestrian not a cyclist . Similarly waymos have been stopped by interlopers placing orange cones on their hoods . Stimulus response whiplash rear-ended. Is waymos insurance premium paid up? Don't presume they're better drivers they're texting when driving.
Computers are definitely much more smart and faster then humans but at the end of the day they don't have consciousness so they can't be called higher intelligence. But the thing is AI technology in cars will make traveling in cars much safer.@@poollife777
Love how everyone is blaming the cyclist here when theres this unmanned behemoth that can't reason like any human hurtling down the street without the consent of the community its terrorising. Glad we're the guinea pigs and we don't even get any benefit from it.
COME ON MAN really the real story is the TREEHUGGING BICYCLIST dont obey TRAFFIC LAWS they simple blow right thru almost all the time i would blame those people and keep that 4x4 handy
2:09 how you gonna blame the city?? It's not like the city made waymo drive its streets. No, they chose to do this in a very congested city with lots of bikers and pedestrians. So you blaming the city shows how people are willing to do mental gymnastics for corporations just trying to make profits. And for what... its not solving any problems only cause more of them 😡
for real, and alot of these people arent even originally from here they are transplants that come here knowing they can get away with being the worst people
People who say "a couple minutes" just lose me. It's a slovenly and irritating way speaking. Say "a couple of minutes." Or I will not give you any of my time.
This is unfortunately the problem with self-driving cars. If someone approaches the car and "attacks" you, you cannot just drive off which is what a human can do!
man, I wonder what's next for you Americans: bullet proof self driving cars? otherwise it's not safe enough? What a self destructive country you guys have there. You guys just cannot have what Japan has. hahaha
OK but that's kinda like if someone splashes paint on your windshield that cannot be wiped off by the wipers, then as a human driver you don't know what to do cos you can barely see anything. That's what the attacker is doing here basically--blinds the AI driver's ability to see.
It's always the humans that are the problem though, not the automated systems. The same thing can happen if a human is driving, right? And with worse outcomes.
Humans seem to have the same issue with ppl protesting and blocking roads , u can't just run over people
Is just another problem... criminal intent should be a crime enforcer part of society eventually.
Hence as said in above.. like paint attack to windshield does create a likely similar hinders.
Kidnapped by a guy blocking sensors? Bay area needs Robocop
The Bay Area needs BATMAN - not more ROBOTS .
Crime - that is the theme here .
Exactly what I was thinking. 👍
Wrong, the attacker will break the window!
Oh come on...nobody...especially criminals will break into cars through the car windows in SF/Oakland or anywhere in the bay area. And they definitely won't do that to steal your stuff in your car. That would be against the law :P
Scary, especially given that a mob destroyed one of these yesterday.
The question is why would you give up the control of a vehicle to an electronic entity ? and yes I mean entity....humans so ready to give up their sovereignty to IA,
Because: 43,000 road fatalities due to human error, road rage, DUI, distraction. May this be a good enough reason for you?
@@MarioHerger check JohnSmith's post. Waymo cars are piloted by Humans.
@@batcactus6046 They are not. Fake News.
I am not ready to give up my sovereignty to Iowa just yet, maybe in 10 years
Also think: "delegation". As when the human wants to sleep or do something more productive than driving a vehicle for that time period. Furthermore, this driverless technology can be integrated as a subsystem into a human's personal vehicle not just in AV taxis.
No one defends themselves here - they just politely cower. These machines are being tested and used as well - meanwhile the city is in shambles and people need jobs . Fancy .
true. citizen are being groomed to basically do nothing and just let the crime happen.
@@_ShaDynasty to be spineless cucks
SF doesn't need driverless cars. It needs cars driven by Terminators.
"Get in to the waymo...NOW" (Arnold voice)
@@MrWiseinheart
terma-waymo in tenderloin at 2 AM:
“Come with me if you want to live”
San Francisco is the worst place to develop this technology. There are too many bicyclists and pedestrians here. I hate these with a passion. Theyre creepy surreal and promote antisocial behavior. They give me the willys. I will always prefer a professional driver taking me to appointments and for running errands. This preview of our future dystopian nightmare needs to take a hike.
The real culprit is the jerk who attacked the Waymo
Many people consider driverless cars unsafe, and are an 'attack' on pedestrians and other drivers.
You've never had a driverless car come towards you without stopping and it shows. You also don't live in the neighborhood that is disproportionately being used as the experiment location and it shows.
@@evelynwaugh4053 Elon Musk promised 8 years ago that Tesla will have Full Self Driving, and today they are nowhere close to delivering on that promise.
They said the car will drive from LA to New York, door to door, automatically. What a J0ke.
@@visibletoa11userz I have & they stop. They do not flee because they’re uninsured, unlicensed & are illegal aliens.
He just wanted a three some. Very common in SF.
Real drivers are waymo better
Best comment on this post!
😅
literally laughed out loud.. best comment on this topic yet :)
🤣
Every car should have a driver. These "self driving" cars are not safe. Other cities have zero or very few traffic fatalities with basic things San Francisco and other cities in the US could be doing.
I'm with you. Like what though?
driverless cars will not work until GPS and everything else they depend on works perfectly all the time. That ain't gonna happen.
Cars in general are not safe. Some cities were able to reduce the deaths, but no large one got to zero over a full year. Looking at less severe accidents everyone is lightyears away, even in medium large cities are hundreds of accidents every day. Nobody reports about them because they are insanely common with human drivers. It can only get better if there are less tired, stressed, aggressive and drunk people in charge of heavy vehicles on public roads. Better strategy is shifting to more public transport and light vehicles like bicycles though.
Seriously..terrible idea
This is just Dumb.
Umm just because they can't use a door handle dont mean. Your safe inside a box stuck
Fake account because I don't want to get sued or anything.
I worked for waymo for almost 2 years. they typically drive themselves. The cars are operated (for the most part) remotely, and we would only take over if the car gets "stuck". which happens quite frequently. Some do have drivers, but I digress.
Usually we would just send roadside dispatch to have someone unstick the car back to the depot. this can take like 10-15 minutes, ive seen it happen.
this isn't the only way to mess with these cars. we had learning modules on pedestrians laying in the road, protestors putting traffic cones in front of the cars, etc.
There's some crazy stuff those cars will attempt to do on their own.
If there is a safety event, whoever was watching the car (all cars are watched on a 1:1 ratio) should have immediately sent a LEO event, it auto notifies police. Depending on the police and waymo response time, someone made a big or even bigger whoopsie. This just after a waymo car hit a bicyclist a few days ago
When cruze (waymo's main competitor) got suspended from operating in San Fran, I was amazed that Waymo was allowed to keep operating there.
What happens if you surround a Waymo car with orange cones all the way around?
you dont even need to go that far. just put a few cones on a 1 way that it cant fit around. 🤣
@@jaycho6747self destruct mode enables
Ok, I wasn't aware that Cruze was suspended in SF, what were the reasons they got sacked? Also how to one get "invited" to become a Waymo passenger? Do you need to make a certain amount of income or have connections?
you can just use their app. I wouldnt exactly recommend it.
cruze also hit someone, this was a few months ago.
no way am i riding in one of those things.
These cars should not be on the road. Way too many problems.
why would anyone get in a car like that
Just like Tesla, In case of a fire... With electronic doors ... You are stuck inside with instant flames ..
Tesla doors have mechanical releases.
Tesla cars are death traps. Too many accidents in my area because of stuck accelerators etc. I would never consider buying one.
@ALT-vz3jn
You mean because drivers stomp the accelerator instead of the brake which has been proven over and over again.
Good for you.
You can open the door mechanically, just as with all other vehicles.
The pedal will obviously stay stuck if the driver keep pressing it the entire time ☠️🤣@@ALT-vz3jn
It's extremely safe driver. Better than any human. I use Waymo all the time.
Can a passenger override the system and take control? I would want that. The way life is, there are situations no one can predict, and I would want to be able to take charge and get myself to safety if possible! This also seems like a really cool job!
💯 agree
Human driven cars hit pedestrians and cyclists many times.
Aimed to be better😊
Closed captioning put question marks on the end of the rider's statements. LOL
Thanks for the laugh as I otherwise completely hated this video.
A place like San Francisco is probably one of the better places to develop such a technology.
Now, only if they could somehow fireproof their autonomous vehicles.
I would love to see them trying to test it in Brazil. Transit in the bigger cities is a free for all and motorcyclists are insane.
@@mrvini1998 I'd love to see that too. Let's all write letters to Waymo asking that they start a pilot program of driverless taxis in Brazil. I'll make the popcorn.
Robocars: We wanna test drive our cars for a few years
Govt: OK go do it in the least populated county or state
Robocars: Nooo! Not like that! We wanna do it in the most congested place in the US!
Govt: ???
The waymo made a left turn in front of the bicycle who was not visible due to a truck. Programmers need to work on that.
AI programs cannot be debugged. Nothing programmers can do. Verify for yourself. Neural networks (core of self driving cars, ) cannot be modified by any human being. Just coefficients, billions of them.
We probably will hit the bicycle too...
Those are some aggressive cycling...
But with 5g maybe all entity can have communication modul that will talk to eaach other on the road hence practically remmove these kinds of accidents?
So you could basically disable the vehicle with a $3.00 can of spray paint if you wanted to!
HERE'S A TEACHING MOMENT: STAY THE HELL OUT OF S.F.
sensors should be on the top of the car and there should be an option for passengers to be able to access and take control of the vehicle in case of emergency
If the bicyclist was obscured by the truck and couldn't be seen with all those sensors and cameras, how could a human without sensors or cameras have seen it?
Unless the cyclist also hv system that communicate with others
So breaking the window would not let you in🤔 sus
Same thing I said 😂. Like uhh naw, pushing unlock is not the only way to get in lol.
That's why we don't need driverless cars. No one asked for this
Oh well, at least San Francisco is a richly diverse and highly progressive Democrat community 😱
This is an example of why driverless cars are simply a bad idea. I think the idea will eventually be abandoned.
Technologists always want to push there little ideas. Look at how much effort they’ve put into trying to develop chatbots to replace employees. They’ve been trying for decades! And we still demand actual human employees.
I no longer feel hurt nor regret for not being accepted by Cruise or Waymo as a user of their driverless cars. Before all that, I just force myself to deal with the difficulties of finding parking. Driving for myself and offering complimentary rides to friends I trust remains a lot safer and more predictable than using Cruise or Waymo. Now, I'm just so glad I made the decision to just drive my own car.
Wait, Robert and his husband? Maybe if it was a girl and a MAN this wouldnt have happened !
Just wait. Putting a traffic cone over the sensor stops the vehicle. Once he was gone go out and remove the cone.
Passengers of driverless cars should be required to carry firearms 😂
I won’t be blaming Waymo for hitting the cyclist looks like it was their fault, doing what everyone else does in cars, which is tailgate someone literally 0.1 seconds away from the car which is just loony.
Yup that what those aggresive cyclist does...
Motorcycles are even worse... usually lead to fatality unlike cyclist 😅
Total fail, this is stupid. This is in no way safe, theyre TRAPPED in there. No f'n way.
The more I read and watch videos like these, les I want to have an EV or ride into this silly self cars. People have lost it, no common sense.
This has what to do with electric cars?
I think the one who has no common sense is you. Just typical narrow minded guy
AI, EV cars there the same.@@gergc4871
Should be heavy penalties for doing this.
News flash: Waymo car also cannot cure cancer! It's not good enough!
So if it rolls in a crash, a good semeratin can't help you because the door handles are hidden
You can’t have nice things in a society of lawlessness.
There should be an alarm in the cars that passengers can use in an emergency
How are these cars legal?
Stupidity is in control , right along with cowardice
Ive ridden one its better than a taxi or an Uber driver that talks your ear off and expects a 20 dollar tip.......
Are the windows indestructible???
This is horrible on multiple levels 😂
Do all the “Men” in SF talk with a lisp
Some say continues exposure to human excrement in your mouth can develop a lisp. But I do not agree.
Stupid technology. Dangerous vehicles. Should be outlawed.
blud mad
I’m not sure who thought this would be a good idea in San Francisco of all places. That’s like putting on of these on skid row, it’s not safe
Most if not all of these problems wouldn't happen if they would just put an employee in the car as a ride along. This should have been required from day 1 but apparently they paid off SF officials to use the city streets as a test track.
Are you expecting for the employee to fight off the homeless person?
“A person who looked homeless,” Kanye looks homeless. It means nothing. Why say it.
Because we know what kind 😅😅😅😅😅
No thank you it's electric they catch fire you will be trapped in a fire.
2:22 that’s so cool homeless people can identify what way no is, where the sensors are but still in spite of the sabotage waymo still keeps sending him obtrusive thoughts. Bike riders are often homeless so yeah it could have been worse😂
Nope..no..i prefer to drive myself
What if your Wifi stops working😱
Duuuh!! If you are in the car then you have a cellphone. Try pressing the number 9 followed by a 1 and another 1. Yes you can use your thumbs.
Democrat Utopia….
So does that mean human drivers killing 40,000 people in the US each year is the Republican Utopia?
Omg shut up. Fuck
That sucks .
Him and his husband, eh...ok.
It would be nice to have my own driverless car to take me to all of my monthly doc appts and surgeries.
Oh no a homeless looking person got close to the driverless taxi I was in 😂😂
Is this satire?
Robert, and his husband…
Waymo are for lazy people. Someone attacks me in my car, you better pray my throttle breaks.
Self driving will be taking over in a way that very few people will drive cars in the future. Like how cars replaced riding horses. It’s making incremental improvements but it will get there.
On Feb 10 (Chinese new year) a waymo decided to drive into Chinatown in San Francisco - It was full of people celebrating and the vehicle stopped - the “revelers” broke the windows threw in fireworks and burned the vehicle to the ground; even though the doors are locked it would be trivial for somebody to break a window and set the car on fire - if I were in control of the car I could at least speed away here you’re trapped do you really want to get out of the vehicle when the people who just attacked it and tried to burn it to the ground are standing right there? Talk about a recipe for disaster.
Well probably can call support to let u drive the car. And 911
this is an AI voice?
Effing homeless people
Don't you know computers can never be wrong because they're considered a higher intelligence ? That presumption of perfection however is rebutted by the examples of confusion they show in ambiguous situations . Such as the Arizona death of a bicyclist walking his bike which made him a pedestrian not a cyclist . Similarly waymos have been stopped by interlopers placing orange cones on their hoods . Stimulus response whiplash rear-ended. Is waymos insurance premium paid up? Don't presume they're better drivers they're texting when driving.
Computers are definitely much more smart and faster then humans but at the end of the day they don't have consciousness so they can't be called higher intelligence. But the thing is AI technology in cars will make traveling in cars much safer.@@poollife777
How can a calculator calculate faster if created by human? Oh wait... it can 😅😊
Love how everyone is blaming the cyclist here when theres this unmanned behemoth that can't reason like any human hurtling down the street without the consent of the community its terrorising.
Glad we're the guinea pigs and we don't even get any benefit from it.
You mean you don't get a contact high from their arrogance? It's really entitling! (sarcasm, of course.) Cheers!
His husband
its okay to be gay
u can tell he's the bottom
@@governoret
It’s okay to be weak and useless too.
When will the first car system get hacked and not follow the speed limit?
traffic info is processed offline , will probably not happen
COME ON MAN really the real story is the TREEHUGGING BICYCLIST dont obey TRAFFIC LAWS they simple blow right thru almost all the time i would blame those people and keep that 4x4 handy
this is a problem with waymo or homeless person?
SanFranPoopSco
2:09 how you gonna blame the city?? It's not like the city made waymo drive its streets. No, they chose to do this in a very congested city with lots of bikers and pedestrians. So you blaming the city shows how people are willing to do mental gymnastics for corporations just trying to make profits. And for what... its not solving any problems only cause more of them 😡
Hilarious. A City of nutz.
for real, and alot of these people arent even originally from here they are transplants that come here knowing they can get away with being the worst people
😖😱🤪🤯😱
Lmaoooo😂
lmao
😂😂😂😂
People who say "a couple minutes" just lose me.
It's a slovenly and irritating way speaking.
Say "a couple of minutes." Or I will not give you any of my time.
Don’t you mean, any of my time ?
@@mrgreg431 Thanks. Man, I gotta fire my proofreader.
😂
How can such thing be allowed. Only in progressive CA. Oblivious of human nature and untested technology.
blud yapping