nope... It's working as intended. If "your side" is losing the electoral college, your side should be putting the work in to make your party more popular in ALL states.. and not just coasting on the states you are currently strong in...
@@kahner93 It's not "more" it's "count at all". If we just did popular vote, no rural voter's vote would mean anything. That's why we have the electoral college. It's a recognition, by the foundars, that giving centralized urban centers all the power is a bad thing. AND... there is nothing stopping dems from reaching out to rural communities and getting dems elected in those states. Look at the Montana Senator, he's had 2 terms in the senate in a deep red state (hoping he gets a 3rd term). No reason we can't elect dems in Oklahoma, North Dakota, or any other red state. But you know, we HAVE TO WORK FOR THEIR VOTES...
@@keanu7318 Yeah, but AGAIN, swing states are just proof that both parties aren't working hard enough to eliminate the non-swing states from the other party. Why haven't the dems put more of an effort into winning Texas (for example). Why haven't the republicans put more effort into winning California? The electoral college is not preventing either party from doing that.
@@bikebudha01 why does a vote in one state matter more than in another state? Make votes equal. That's like saying that in football, when a team scores a touchdown, the amount of points they get depends on the state they are from, its stupid.
Of course It is a big advantage for the Republican party, the electoral college for the simple reason that they had a chance to win presidential elections because if the elections will decide like the normal in every democratic country, The elections will be resolved by popular vote.
@@ozjohn8657after all the lying and terrible campaign? Hes lucky to cross 270.. he is a dishonest and corrupt man and only his loyal base ignores that..
Of course it will. A republican vote is inherently more valuable because of the electoral college
He just said that isn’t true.
Your statement is not correct and does not apply for all US Republicans.
The electoral college should be abolished
nope... It's working as intended. If "your side" is losing the electoral college, your side should be putting the work in to make your party more popular in ALL states.. and not just coasting on the states you are currently strong in...
@@bikebudha01 why should someone's vote count more depending on the state that they live in?
@@kahner93 It's not "more" it's "count at all". If we just did popular vote, no rural voter's vote would mean anything. That's why we have the electoral college. It's a recognition, by the foundars, that giving centralized urban centers all the power is a bad thing. AND... there is nothing stopping dems from reaching out to rural communities and getting dems elected in those states. Look at the Montana Senator, he's had 2 terms in the senate in a deep red state (hoping he gets a 3rd term). No reason we can't elect dems in Oklahoma, North Dakota, or any other red state. But you know, we HAVE TO WORK FOR THEIR VOTES...
@@keanu7318 Yeah, but AGAIN, swing states are just proof that both parties aren't working hard enough to eliminate the non-swing states from the other party. Why haven't the dems put more of an effort into winning Texas (for example). Why haven't the republicans put more effort into winning California? The electoral college is not preventing either party from doing that.
@@bikebudha01 why does a vote in one state matter more than in another state? Make votes equal. That's like saying that in football, when a team scores a touchdown, the amount of points they get depends on the state they are from, its stupid.
Maine and Nebraska have the best electoral models in the US; while not perfect, individual votes for president actually count …what a concept.
Is it just me, or does Mr. Skelley bear a strong resemblance to TJ Miller?
Go blue if you all make that mistake we all will regret. It
We are not going back to the Biden administration. Vote red ❤️
Yes. If you vote democrat we will all regret it.
Vote blue 💙
Of course It is a big advantage for the Republican party, the electoral college for the simple reason that they had a chance to win presidential elections because if the elections will decide like the normal in every democratic country, The elections will be resolved by popular vote.
Imagine if Trump wins the PV and Harris wins the EC this time.
That would actually make me happy.
Impossible. He would need to win in places like California, and she would need to win in places like Wyoming for that to happen.
@@AxelsAndGears I would still call for the abolition of the electoral college.
Quick answer: no
Not worried. Nate Cohn says democrats are all good, and that's all I need to hear. Trump is simply unfit 💙
All I know is I am voting for trump
If democrats can make Texas a stable blue which is possible eventually then we will see a change.
Trump 272 Harris 266
Trump will be in the 320s
@@ozjohn8657after all the lying and terrible campaign? Hes lucky to cross 270.. he is a dishonest and corrupt man and only his loyal base ignores that..
@@bizarrocker lol. Lying and terrible campaign? You listen to Kamala Chameleon and the liberal news too much.
I don't think so. Dems are coming out in record numbers. I've seen more women than usual in voting lines.
@@ozjohn8657I've been seeing more women in voting lines than I've ever seen. We shall see.
Let's hope so! Trump Vance 2024.
Haris 283
lol. Get ready to be disappointed.