Godox AD300 vs AD100 vs AD200 vs Profoto B10X, B10X Plus Neewer Q300 Q4 photography flash SURPRISE !

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 219

  • @MarkusPix
    @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +17

    Note: The Neewer Q300 does not have HSS or TTL. I do not use HSS much and never use TTL (I always shoot manual for full control). Remember HSS cuts flash power in half, drains your batteries much faster and can cause horizontal lines in the image when used with cameras like a Sony A7C and any camera using Electronic Front Curtain Shutter (EFCS) which can cause banding issues with HSS. If you do want HSS and TTL with a powerful but inexpensive flash, then I suggest the Neewer Q4 400ws It's available at this moment for $336 WITH a flash trigger! You can't beat that for value and power, plus it's Bowens mount amzn.to/40v8B3D and with a Leftfoto 7" reflector, it's just as bright as a Godox AD600!

    • @_HMCB_
      @_HMCB_ 18 дней назад +3

      @@MarkusPix awesome info Markus. Thank you.

  • @photohomie
    @photohomie 18 дней назад +30

    Only Profoto product you sold me on is that frenel attachment you can stick on AD100s. Thanks for doing the work for us nerds. Don’t think I need more than my 2 AD100s for travel , 3 AD200s and 2 AD600s for Studio work.

    • @LilaWolken1987
      @LilaWolken1987 18 дней назад

      do you have a link? for the frenel attachment?

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +1

      @@LilaWolken1987 amzn.to/48wkAA3

  • @UNIONFEATURES
    @UNIONFEATURES 18 дней назад +17

    These videos are so watchable. Marcus' presenting style is 💯

  • @Photomeike
    @Photomeike 18 дней назад +7

    I’m so glad you did this. This confirms my argument that the AD300 is really not worth the price over the AD200. I’ve been saying this ever since i bought and reviews the AD300 4 years ago. Still love my Profotos tho 😅.

  • @greggeis918
    @greggeis918 16 дней назад +3

    Can’t tell you how appreciative I am of you taking the time to do these. It really helps me out. Now if you could get an A9 III to come up with all the tips on the flash delay and global shutter workflow to get the most out of the flashes and how much more you can get out of the small flashes that would be awesome. Just $6k and a massive workflow video for a tiny sliver of the photo community lol.

  • @toddstrong1353
    @toddstrong1353 5 дней назад

    How fun was this video to make?! :D It was certainly fun to watch. This is practical knowledge everyone needs to have, especially beginners. Advertising creates an air of superiority for some brands. What I noticed a long time ago was that light was light and if you knew how to use it, you could get amazing results with ANY light no matter the brand or cost. You certainly have proved that through numerous videos and, you use of hard light is nothing short of astonishing. Always entertaining and useful material. Thanks Markus.

  • @Government_Username
    @Government_Username 18 дней назад +5

    Thanks for reviewing these light for us Markus. Going to purchase my first AD100

  • @harambesminion9266
    @harambesminion9266 18 дней назад +9

    Man you love those AD100’s!! I’m over here obsessed with the AD200’s lol! I’m loving my AD200 PRO II and probably going to buy another one here soon.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад

      Yes the 200s are great. I love the Quantum mount bare bulb. ruclips.net/video/WeFt5FkWXfU/видео.html

  • @Jwitherow1964
    @Jwitherow1964 18 дней назад +3

    I must have a boring life this was the best this I saw all week. Yahoo love y’all

  • @Cicilicious17118
    @Cicilicious17118 18 дней назад +4

    your videos are so informative and straight to the point. your channel is seriously such a valuable resource to anyone wanting to learn about lighting or make informed purchases. thank you for all that you do!!

  • @papaj0n
    @papaj0n 17 дней назад

    I don't go on YT much these days, but when I see one of your videos, Markus, I have to watch. Thank you!

  • @AprilG123
    @AprilG123 8 дней назад

    You nailed it, I want to have fun shooting and don't want to worry about a 2k light. Love the size of the ad100 as well, great video as always 🎉 👏

  • @toothoot8202
    @toothoot8202 18 дней назад +1

    Thank you for taking the time to make these videos. Another banger from Mr Markus!

  • @rhykko77
    @rhykko77 18 дней назад +1

    So glad that I found your channel ......been watching for years......great stuff thanks !

  • @spost26
    @spost26 18 дней назад +1

    Thank you so much for making this video!! I’m just starting my off camera flash journey and this is extremely valuable!! I love your straightforward and down to earth style of presenting!

    • @_HMCB_
      @_HMCB_ 18 дней назад +1

      He’s the best.

    • @UNIONFEATURES
      @UNIONFEATURES 18 дней назад +2

      I'm a professional photographer of 30+ years and I can still learn from Marcus' videos.

  • @steveritchie4926
    @steveritchie4926 14 дней назад

    Love these videos, Markus. Super happy with my AD100 and some additional gadgets thanks to your advice.

  • @eoslove2022
    @eoslove2022 18 дней назад +1

    These are the best product reviews out there in terms of performance numbers versus price point.

    • @earlekimel7771
      @earlekimel7771 18 дней назад

      Solid as always! I’m hoping Neewer sends you its new round body style Q200 for a test before you (eventually) get rid of your AD 300 again. They’re advertising the flash as on sale but the only reviews I’ve seen are for the Q3, which is an AD 200 copy.

  • @mapgrrl
    @mapgrrl 16 дней назад +1

    as a photo student without a lot of spare $$ to spend on these I appreciate this advice. Ive gotten nice results with only the AD200 + umbrella.

  • @allabouthim03
    @allabouthim03 18 дней назад

    Thanks brother, that was a mouth and mind fill 😅. I just shot a wedding yesterday with a GTX Studio TTL-480. It's actually a rebranded Neewer product that I can't seem to find anymore. It's cheap but effective. I like it because the transmitter has most of the functionality of the more expensive brands.

  • @Potalakh
    @Potalakh 18 дней назад +2

    Love my ad100pro for mobility and lightweight, I use it in reportage work on stick in my hand and sometimes in portraits and backlight.
    Love my ad200pro in reprtage work, I light them halls, and use on stands in corners.
    Love my ad300pro for portrait work in combo with godox ad-s85 softbox.
    Love my ad400pro for power and recycling speed. I use it in advertising and overpovering the sun.

  • @anushtechreviews
    @anushtechreviews 18 дней назад

    Hi markus, im a long time viewer of your channel, today you cleared my doubt that i have got in my mind for a long time thank you so much.

  • @uncle_trapper
    @uncle_trapper 18 дней назад +1

    Hey Marcus, new subscriber here. Love reviewers that actually review the product in real world scenarios. Discovered you thru Kasey of Camera Conspiracies. Great work in your colabs.

  • @DAVE_WHITE
    @DAVE_WHITE 18 дней назад +1

    Great information.. I still only use 1 Ad600 and 2 ad200 with the diffusers you tested and Recommended

  • @chickerson1425
    @chickerson1425 18 дней назад

    I watched your video right before this session
    Use one ad200 and 2 ad300 out the box. Came out great thanks

  • @mxilplict
    @mxilplict 18 дней назад

    Thanks Markus - you have confirmed what I have long suspected since i own all of the Godox line and have gravitated toward AD100s for their portability, flexibility (using all the round attachments and profoto fresnels!), price and relative power. I only use my AD300s in my quick flip soft boxes. And not seen in a long time on your channel, my AD360 II’s still get love on my boom pole and stroboframe pro bracket when the venue or shoot style call for them!

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад

      Yes the 360s are still the perfect output!

  • @uncle0eric
    @uncle0eric 18 дней назад +1

    Got the AD100 at your recommendation. No regrets.

  • @By_Rant_Or_Ruin
    @By_Rant_Or_Ruin 18 дней назад

    Good quality as usual. Audio is great. footage is great as usual. Thanks.

  • @AnthonyBonillaPR
    @AnthonyBonillaPR 17 дней назад

    Love your honest and no nonsense reviews.

  • @TravisCurry
    @TravisCurry 11 дней назад

    Man you’re great! Thanks for putting this together. I have 2 AD300 Pros that I use at the studio with my 3 AD 600 ‘s. For location work I bring the 300 Pro’s and some flashes. I’d love to have a very light location kit with 3-4 AD 100s and those great popup modifiers made by Angler and some lightweight stands and keep the heavier shit in my studio!

  • @1977borg
    @1977borg 18 дней назад +2

    Hi Markus! Great content as always! Try the ad300 without the frosty reflector - protector which is on top of the bulb. Maybe then the results will be different...

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +1

      Great question! I did . You'd think it would be better, but what's even more surprising is the results are actually worse! Its one tenth of a stop less bright when I removed the frosted cover, same results with all 3 reflectors!

  • @petrgabaj4958
    @petrgabaj4958 6 дней назад

    Thank you for this helpful video Markus! After 20 years shooting with various Elinchroms (which I still love) I am hunting for small size battery flashes because some jibs are simple & fast and I am becoming lazy to carry heads + battery unit + cables. And I am not willing to pay extra money for the brand anymore - so after I gave enough time to Chinese factories to learn (and they really did) I am open now to step out of my habits :) AD 100 seems to be amazing - but what I miss in your battery flashes comparison is the battery capacity - and this info would be extra helpful. How many shots in full power gives you AD 100 and Q4? Especialy AD 100 size means small battery :) Can you shoot with AD100 while it is charging? Can you feed it from extra power bank? Are their batteries replacable when they degrade too much? Many thanx again, you do great job 👏👏👏

  • @e_Dave
    @e_Dave 18 дней назад +8

    Neewer seriously needs more recognition, they’re a great universal camera company with great bang-for-your-buck deals. The ONE time I was unsatisfied with their product they gave me a refund no questions asked. Wonderful company!

    • @AndrewDaughtry
      @AndrewDaughtry 18 дней назад +1

      Absolutely correct. The only issue seems to be their clones can't seem to stay in stock

    • @o0YumRamen0o
      @o0YumRamen0o 17 дней назад +1

      Agreed they bring prices back down to reasonable levels when big boys like Aputure and Profoto push them sky high

  • @isoawe1888
    @isoawe1888 7 дней назад

    Another informative video. Thanks. I love all my Godox. Didn’t know about the 100 vs 300 comparison. Totally sold me, until I want to reach for a Godox softbox that attaches to 300 and 400. For hard light, will probably be a couple more fresnel lenses for 100. Thanks

  • @hiepvophan
    @hiepvophan 2 дня назад

    Another great video Markus! Thank you for sharing. BTW, the Elinchrom One and Three have a similar bulb design as that Neewer Q300. Elinchrom advertised their One (131Ws) just as powerful as the B10 with the OCF Magnum. Might be worth a check.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  2 дня назад +1

      Yes I just tested an Elinchrom 3. The light output was actually less than an AD100 at full power! I was shocked. Nice interface, sounds, etc, but pretty big and heavy for only being 261ws.

    • @hiepvophan
      @hiepvophan 2 дня назад

      @@MarkusPixinteresting to hear. I think that would cover the majority of the portable strobe category. Thank you. Also it might be interesting for you. I recently got a Leekai LK-51Pro, a super compact, lightweight and quick to deploy lightstand that can handle my AD300 with ease. Only available in China.

  • @bn5fg
    @bn5fg 18 дней назад +3

    Nice tests as always! But let’s get practical:
    The AD300 isn’t just brighter with the SMDV softbox; it also fills the front diffuser more effectively, resulting in softer light. The same goes for the AD200. There’s a specific SMDV adapter for the AD200 bare bulb, which requires a firm push-sometimes involving a bit of rubber tearing-to fully fit and properly illuminate the softbox. Without a softbox, the AD100 performs excellently, and I often use four of them as ambient fills indoors and for accents or FX. In fact, for indoor shots, AD100s/V1 are my main tools. I even use two V350s as accent lights indoors because they’re so lightweight, and two MF12s as rim lights.
    Outdoors, though, I’m a bit skeptical. For me, outdoor lighting usually starts at the AD200 level since I need a softbox as a key light outside. SMDV softboxes are optimized for the AD100, but if I want to use a different softbox, the AD100 isn’t quite suitable. I often use the AD100 with a 120cm white umbrella indoors, but that setup isn’t realistic outdoors-the umbrella would likely break. Indoors, you can even bounce light off the ceiling for a key light, but unfortunately, there’s no ceiling outdoors.
    And I’ll say this again: the AD300’s default reflector is more of a bulb protector, so running power tests with it isn’t entirely fair.
    As for Profoto... well, it’s just not worth the money for me. But the Magnum clic reflector/fresnel are cool, and I wish Godox offered a similar, more affordable options. SMDV reflectors require an adapter, so they end up being a bit too clunky for my setup.
    And thank you for highlighting the value of Neewer lights!

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад

      The SMDV is double diffusion.
      Here are several shoots I did with AD100 in softboxes outdoors
      ruclips.net/video/yxwJRoD2u1U/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/2Vg-WYMlqWk/видео.html
      but of course they were full power, but it is possible.

    • @bn5fg
      @bn5fg 18 дней назад

      ​@@MarkusPix SMDV is more than just a double-diffusion softbox; it features a thoughtfully designed inner diffuser placement with large gaps on the outer ring, which helps balance the hotspot created by the AD100's fresnel head. However, a central hotspot still becomes easily visible at f/22. This can be somewhat mitigated with an AK-R11 dome, but it costs about a stop of light.
      When using the AD200 and AD300 with the SMDV softbox, you can achieve bright edges and a soft center, resulting in overall softer light and more gradual shadow terminators. You might call me a light snob, but I can definitely spot the difference!
      With the Godox S85/120T, the AD300 provides a perfectly illuminated front diffuser(so I think, we can get fewer highlights compared to the SMDV with the AD300, which creates a bright-edge, beauty-dish-like effect.). However, these things are heavier compared to SMDV. Not so portable and much slower to set up.

  • @MartinV.
    @MartinV. 18 дней назад

    Great Video! I'm going to have to pick up a few of those ad100's

  • @Augnos
    @Augnos 18 дней назад

    Thank you so much, Markus! This is a super in-depth comparison. Would you also be able to compare t.1 times for each of these as well? For me, freezing motion is just as important as getting the most light for my strobes.

  • @aCuria.
    @aCuria. 17 дней назад

    Great comparison, this is why I use AD100 and 600

  • @YudhaWManggala
    @YudhaWManggala 17 дней назад

    Thank You Master !!! This is so informative . Especially for me! Thank you once again

  • @NebulousFilms
    @NebulousFilms 18 дней назад

    Hey Markus, very informative video as always. Saving us from overspending. Do you have any insights in how these flashes compare in regards to firing off multiple shots in quick succesion. Let's say you have to shoot multiple people very quickly right after one another. Or if you have to react quick while shooting events. The generally cheaper or older equipment I've used so far often lets me down by not firing consistantly after one or two shots.

  • @luke_angling
    @luke_angling 15 дней назад

    Thank you for the great information on your videos about cameras. I'm just starting making videos and at the moment use a Gopro for tripod, but I am looking for a better camera. You have lot of really helpful information on your channel. Have you used a Sony a7S II, they seem to be good and I can buy a used one.

  • @rawbsworld6604
    @rawbsworld6604 16 дней назад

    Very illuminating vid 👍 well done thanks ✌️🤙

  • @_HMCB_
    @_HMCB_ 18 дней назад

    Hey Markus, I wonder how the Neewer Q300 performs through a softbox. Would love to see a Q300 dedicated video. Seems like a super value and seeing it put through various paces would be awesome. Great video by the way.

  • @daveinportland
    @daveinportland 18 дней назад

    Love these comparisons.
    Do you have a video about the light meter you use and what the numbers mean?
    Appreciate it.

  • @AidanCusack
    @AidanCusack 18 дней назад

    Great info as always.....what about recycle times?.......if say at a fashion show with quick fire flashing would the AD300 not perform better overall than an AD100?.......I have them all and love the 100's for portability.

  • @georgehenry3384
    @georgehenry3384 16 дней назад

    I love the 100, inexpensive, powerful and portable!!! And the sync can do three of them!!!

  • @surreal_youtube
    @surreal_youtube 17 дней назад

    Great comparison 👍
    if in regards to color accuracy for archival reproduction would there be a big difference ?
    Thanks & have a great day

  • @paoescobar_photography
    @paoescobar_photography 18 дней назад +2

    I love the ad200 and 600

  • @bwest6275
    @bwest6275 18 дней назад

    Dropping the ka-nowledge bombs as usual 👌I just ordered an AD100pro after watching this 😄

  • @MileyonDisney
    @MileyonDisney 18 дней назад +1

    And. it helps to have a beautiful model, Mr. Lucky! hehe

  • @photorealm
    @photorealm 18 дней назад

    Great video, packed with useful information. If you fired off all o the flashes you have at the same time, they would see it on the space station and the cities grid would brown out LOL

  • @stefano_campani
    @stefano_campani 17 дней назад

    Thank you Markus! Interesting comparison in a practical way of using.
    What about a speedlite, like the godox v1?
    Have you ever tried something?

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад +1

      The AD100 is twice as bright, smaller and more fun ruclips.net/video/o8bdbLW2gAs/видео.html

    • @stefano_campani
      @stefano_campani 16 дней назад

      @MarkusPix thank you markus

  • @HagaishiSama
    @HagaishiSama 18 дней назад

    Awesome video as always 👌🏿

  • @NakormiteVasu
    @NakormiteVasu 18 дней назад

    You are hacking my flashworld, thank you! =)

  • @GEORGEEEJ
    @GEORGEEEJ 18 дней назад

    Great informative review. Thank You

  • @bluerainbug
    @bluerainbug 18 дней назад

    Out of curiosity, I took out my ad100 and ad300 for testing too. I set my camera to manual and both flashes to maximum power. I faced both flashes towards the ceiling. I then intentionally set my camera settings for an underexposed base shot then took test shots of the entire room with each flash. The ad300 being a more powerful flash always lit the entire room to the point of overexposure whereas the ad100 just looked properly exposed. I did this several times with similar results. I think therefore the ad300 in my opinion is a stronger flash than the ad100.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад

      1. Use a light meter.
      2. Sounds like you weren't aware of the 28 or 85mm setting on the 100.
      Like I said, the 300 is better for architectural photography, while the 100 is more suited to portraits.

  • @lachopakapura
    @lachopakapura 18 дней назад

    Markus as usual your videos are top notch.
    Do you think you can give some pointers on how to get in touch and persuade or even collaborate with producers.
    What i mean is i have several ideas for making TV shows or even movies but I don't have the power to do it myself and really wish I could collaborate with someone.
    I once seen in one of your videos where you talk about your career that you said that if you believe in something and that something is great you can get others to follow along .
    would love to hear your tips and thoughts

  • @numara585
    @numara585 17 дней назад +1

    Even though the Neewer is now on sale for $215 with a trigger, I own many Godox flashes. Unfortunately, each brand uses its own wireless flash trigger, and they aren't compatible with each other. A Universal Flash Trigger would be a valuable addition.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад

      Yes I have the same problem with clothes. Do I wear casual pants with shirt hanging over, or dress pants with shirt tucked in. It's either or, but cant have both

  • @WongTanabaNg
    @WongTanabaNg 16 дней назад

    Danke Herr Markus. Sehr Schoen und schnell

  • @paristo
    @paristo 18 дней назад

    It is difficult to recommend anything else than AD100 for beginners and anyone who needs to be on mobile. If going for softboxes in studio, gamefield is different.
    But AD100 hits well above price, size, weight and power it is challenged for. Well done Godox.
    I have AD200's and now wondering should I upgrade to the "Pro II" model that would have the LED modeling light with bulb head. As sometimes in studio it is very nice to be able get the better idea how to position the flash without taking few test shots first. But it really is not so big deal as I do not shoot anymore film or polaroids and waste money and time via that way.
    The AD200 works great when you need those softboxes and need to be mobile. So pairing AD100 and AD200 is really something.
    I have in storage a old large format flashes. It has power pack that can power three flashes, but all at same power, so no individual channel/cable control. But you do that with moving lights distance. But unusable as they are too powerful. I needed f/32 and 2 stops ND filter to get a acceptable exposure for face from 1 meter distance of the subject to the softbox surface (1 meter diameter) when the power was for one flash and at minimum. The power can be adjusted only in nine levels, and IIRC is 3 stops between lowest and highest, so 1/3 stops per click (it has big black knob to select from 1 to 9).
    But oh boy were those nice when doing large group photo shoots, like a 200 people in the frame. All three flashes evenly distributed to front of the people in that 20-25 meter wide group and....
    Didn't need anything else. That is the reason I hang on those even today, even when I don't ever need those anymore.

  • @CarlosDavidFoto
    @CarlosDavidFoto 18 дней назад +1

    Can you try removing the glass on the AD300 as a test of it's clean output with and without those reflectors. I just wish the AD100s used the same battery as the AD200 and AD300.

  • @misaelmarroquin6504
    @misaelmarroquin6504 18 дней назад

    You should try some of the magmod light diffusion and see what the power is.

  • @olafschermann1592
    @olafschermann1592 17 дней назад

    Diffusors spread the light energy to a larger area. Therefore the more focused AD100 shows a higher light output at the meter.

  • @frantzfilms
    @frantzfilms 18 дней назад +1

    there are also some factors as color consistancy and possibility to make like 10-20 flashes burst without issues

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад

      People like to say that but I've never had issues with Godox. The colors always look the same.

  • @taqx
    @taqx 18 дней назад

    You are the best!Sr!! thank you!!!

  • @nicksavage4763
    @nicksavage4763 18 дней назад

    SMALLER, MORE COMPACT and As
    EFFICIENT AS LARGER.
    Thanks Marcus

  • @rasicaal
    @rasicaal 18 дней назад

    Hello Markus, thanks for the video. What settings did you use for the Sekonic for the tests?

  • @TheMrKonov
    @TheMrKonov 17 дней назад

    Great video! Would you find a way to attach ad 100 to a camera for wedding and events. I saw people walk with monopod in their other hand, but it’s not convenient and it’s bad for videographers.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад

      ruclips.net/video/VZQM3EJ8IXc/видео.html

  • @jaimesilva3934
    @jaimesilva3934 16 дней назад

    Interesting test, as I own both the AD200 Pro and the AD300 Pro. I did not get at what power are you testing the flashes. Are they been tested at full power?

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  15 дней назад +1

      Yes full power, 8 ft non-HSS is about 2/10ths of a stop more than HSS

    • @jaimesilva3934
      @jaimesilva3934 14 дней назад

      @MarkusPix Thank you for clarifying. I want to buy another flash, but I'm a bit unsure. I own a Godox AD300 and 2x Godox AD200 Pro. I was about to buy another 300, but maybe I will get the new AD200 Pro II instead.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  8 дней назад

      definitely get a 200! Or even a 100 ruclips.net/video/2C_M2Edg9OE/видео.html

  • @saucelove
    @saucelove 17 дней назад +1

    What about the actual quality of the light from the B10X? and the Ad100? is it a better light?

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад +1

      Both are good. The B10X shots are no better looking.

  • @Cinders7
    @Cinders7 18 дней назад

    Informative so thanks! Just curious about your thoughts on the Leofoto reflector. I searched your profile but nothing comes up about it. Have you done a review on it?

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +1

      You need to watch more of my videos. I've done numerous videos about it
      ruclips.net/video/AYB_4LYhezs/видео.html and
      ruclips.net/video/L6VpoYlFoZU/видео.html

    • @Cinders7
      @Cinders7 17 дней назад

      @@MarkusPix thanks kindly! Watching both now. I appreciate your help.

  • @Creatorcho7
    @Creatorcho7 19 часов назад

    Make speedlite flash comparison too.❤❤❤

  • @amorosasdelperu_oficial
    @amorosasdelperu_oficial 17 дней назад

    Hola, excelente video. Me recomiendas un GODOX AD100 Pro. actualmente tengo un Godox AD200 Pro. Queria comprarme un Godox AD300 Pro. Pero por lo que vi tengo mis dudas.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  16 дней назад +1

      Recomiendo otros 200 o 100 ruclips.net/video/L6VpoYlFoZU/видео.html

  • @marcinmrzyglocki
    @marcinmrzyglocki 18 дней назад

    One more plus for AD200: I have a running "habit" of falling down lightstands due to wind or overlook, yet no flash has been harmed - "horned" protectors make AD200s jump and hop around on pavements or asphalt like cute balls. No light was damaged this way so far. No other light mentioned here seems to have similar silicone attachments, so I would probably need to replace them almost instantly.
    Edit: there are bumpers for XPLOR 100 and 300, which are rebrands of AD100 and AD300 respectively, I highly recommend them for outdoor shooters with a bit too much spontaneity for their gear to handle.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +1

      Always weight them down when outside ruclips.net/video/hz89VIMQZDY/видео.html

    • @marcinmrzyglocki
      @marcinmrzyglocki 18 дней назад

      @@MarkusPix with the weights I have at my disposal, I still lose so many times...

  • @Hennequing
    @Hennequing 18 дней назад +7

    The video everyone was wishing for

  • @jamesgamerguy3
    @jamesgamerguy3 18 дней назад

    as someone who likes to hike or beach to photograph i never take my ad300s unless i absolutely know im going to use them. they are too heavy and take up too much space. but seeing how the ad100 outperform them. i might have to re evaluate and get some of them in place of my ad300s.

  • @j.bojrgensen4260
    @j.bojrgensen4260 17 дней назад

    Hi Marcus !
    Thanks for your informative video’s.
    One thing is the output, but what about the quality and concinstasy of the light.
    I have a couple og Canon speedlights and a godox ad 600 pro, which I use in stable color mode.
    I find the godox is giving me a much more pleasing look, than the Canon . I find the Canon is much more blue and hard looking.
    I have tried to compensate by moving the interval color slider from blue to red, which gives me a much more pleasing look.
    The godox however looks better.
    Is there any difference with the lights in this video ?
    It could be interesting, as you have testing all of them!
    Thanks 🏅🏅🏅🏅⛱️

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад

      These all look good. I've posted many videos showing photoshoots with the AD100, 200, 600. The Profoto definitely doesn't look better and the Neewer looks good so far, I haven't done any shoots yet with them but you can see the color and look in the test shots on the white wall ruclips.net/video/L6VpoYlFoZU/видео.html

  • @kennethnielsen3864
    @kennethnielsen3864 18 дней назад

    Thanks for sharing.

  • @lorisbon
    @lorisbon 18 дней назад

    Hi Markus, have you seen the new panasonic 4k camcorder hc-vx3 ?
    If yes, are you gonna review him ?
    Big shout out from France !

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад +1

      Doesn't look like it's much different than the VX1 (which I don't like). They say it's supposed to have better low light capabilities, but with a tiny 1/2.5" sensor, I would guess its just software enhancement. I'm definitely not running out to get one

  • @denizahmet2299
    @denizahmet2299 13 дней назад

    Business idea - Someone (maybe you!) needs to bring a Fresnel mount for the ADS2.

  • @jonnezb
    @jonnezb 18 дней назад

    Thanks Markus! I have the AD300 but going to pick up the AD100 instead to save the weight! What's the power difference with the AD100 in the 24/28 vs the 32 inch quick setup soft box? Is there much in it?

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +1

      The bigger the light source, the softer and more flattering the portraits. The 32 isn't that much bigger when collapsed. I think 32-36 is the perfect portable softbox size.

  • @YorkBryan1
    @YorkBryan1 15 дней назад

    Markus,
    How do you store all your Ad100's and AD200's? Do you have a special case you bought?
    I have one of each and the cases they come in are great but I would like to store them all together and get more AD100's.
    Also where do you buy your fresnel attachment for the AD100 and diffused reflector for the AD200?
    Thank you!

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  14 дней назад

      AD100 fresnel amzn.to/3YWDQ6w
      AD200 reflector amzn.to/4hB1sVF
      This is where I store them ruclips.net/video/QoClhx6QG4A/видео.html

    • @YorkBryan1
      @YorkBryan1 14 дней назад

      @@MarkusPix Thank you sir!

  • @BlkInc1
    @BlkInc1 17 дней назад

    Seems like the Neewer Q4 is the way to go

  • @rkgaustin
    @rkgaustin 17 дней назад

    Are you going to review the new Panasonic camcorders?

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад

      You mean the VX3? No diff than VX1 except some software to enhance low light shots on that tiny 1/2.5 sensor

  • @JohnnyMotel99
    @JohnnyMotel99 18 дней назад

    How about colour rendition? Will the Neewer give the exact same colour temp flash after flash?

  • @Walter_Kircher
    @Walter_Kircher 11 дней назад

    Markus, give the Godox AD-R11 7" reflector and diffuser a try for the AD300 Pro... light quality is already better or same without diffuser than AD-R14 with diffuser... and brighter

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  11 дней назад +1

      Yeah the 14 doesn't do much

    • @Walter_Kircher
      @Walter_Kircher 10 дней назад

      @@MarkusPix I found and went for this AD-R11 because of your AD300 clip with the custom refelctor... it is same with native Godox mount... not available in Europe and US... so Ali sent me two plus the diffusers from Ad600. 🙏 Dankeschön!

  • @jimpurcell
    @jimpurcell 17 дней назад

    Thanks

  • @josecolon8143
    @josecolon8143 18 дней назад

    Making my life so much easier 🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗

  • @vickydec1
    @vickydec1 18 дней назад +1

    does Godox trigger work with combination of lights (Ad400 + Q300) type lighting

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +1

      Godox only works with Godox, not Neewer.

  • @izphstudio
    @izphstudio 11 дней назад

    you can link to the Fresnel lens for the AD100

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  11 дней назад +1

      I did. It's in the description box
      amzn.to/48wkAA3

  • @jpdj2715
    @jpdj2715 17 дней назад

    You outed the Watt.seconds trap. Ws are a unit of energy consumption and not light output. That this can happen, what you unveil, is no surprise, but was already a theme in photography school in 1970.
    I would have loved to see the ~new 200Pro as well, by the way.
    Nevertheless, thank you for this video.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад

      Yeah men are so obsessed with numbers like horsepower, size, speed, brightness, loudness and price. Like a macho guy at a stoplight with an 800 hp car feeling all cocky.... until a motorcyle shows up 😅

  • @glssjg
    @glssjg 18 дней назад

    Some of those flashes look like they’re using cob leds. How are you finding the transition from bulbs like the ad200 to the new led versions. Better battery life, more power, color temperature, flicker?

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад

      I hate the new ones. Nothing beats the original bare bulb

  • @coleargue7194
    @coleargue7194 18 дней назад

    I would be curious to hear your thoughts on the new neewer q200. It looks like a cross between the ad100 and ad200.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад

      I didn't get it because its comparable to the AD200 but doesn't have a bare bulb which is what makes the AD200 so fantastic. Plus the Q200 is bigger.

  • @rictar_rat
    @rictar_rat 18 дней назад

    what are you thoughts with 2 AD200's in the AD-B2? One of the reasons I picked 2 Ad200's over the AD400 was the versatility though its kinda awkward with everything mounted up there.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +1

      Not a big fan of the ADB2. I have it but never use it. The weight of the ADB2 and two AD200s together is pretty hefty, might as well get a 400 or 600. One 200 is actually pretty good by itself in a modifier even in bright sunlight ruclips.net/video/WeFt5FkWXfU/видео.html If I use 2 AD100s, I would much rather split them up from different directions using ADS2, filling in shadows and giving same output as AD600 ruclips.net/video/L6VpoYlFoZU/видео.html

  • @Imbrondiir
    @Imbrondiir 18 дней назад

    I’m curious of the difference between ad100 and ad300 with a softbox

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад

      Watch the whole video!!!! ruclips.net/video/_07Z6JT4fSg/видео.html

  • @VladimirHidalgo
    @VladimirHidalgo 17 дней назад

    What is the Fresnel used in the AD100? thank you

  • @stkuj
    @stkuj 17 дней назад

    Is there a less expensive fresnel head other than the Profoto one for the AD100?

  • @genejoanen
    @genejoanen 18 дней назад

    Is the AD300 just designed for faster flash reset? Or better with heat? I struggle to understand. Getting a Neewer now! Q4 is tempting. I broke my prophoto and sorta glad I did😅

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  18 дней назад +3

      Funny- people think Profotos are built out of superhero material, they break like every other flash lol.

    • @genejoanen
      @genejoanen 18 дней назад

      @MarkusPix you speak the truth! I try to always buy stuff that's going to last a long time and usually it pans out pretty good. Then I run into some brands that are just overrated. I have learned that flashes are expendable!

  • @poetcurious
    @poetcurious 11 дней назад

    The AD200 is also easier to pack multiple lights in a small bag as it’s not round.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  11 дней назад

      You would think but that's not true. Its considerably bigger and heavier. The length is what makes it not fit as well and the weight is almost double that of a 100. You could never fit a 200 in this kit ruclips.net/video/7HYD9r1ZeAs/видео.html
      Here is a bag where I have 3 AD 100's ruclips.net/video/5bJQVHnH2po/видео.html
      and ruclips.net/video/o8bdbLW2gAs/видео.html

  • @JAK-e4k
    @JAK-e4k 17 дней назад

    How about the Elinchrom Three as a comparison? Very dependable and 1/3 the price of Profoto... but the same size.

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  17 дней назад

      A 131ws flash for 900 dollars?? and the bigger one needs a cord and separate power supply? Where's the joy in that? 🤔

    • @JAK-e4k
      @JAK-e4k 16 дней назад

      @@MarkusPix Not the One, The Three, it's a 261Ws unit and tests have shown that it is more than that. No separate power supply, uses UBS C charging and the battery lasts over 500 full flashes. I got it for 700$. Very reliable, takes Profoto and Elinchrom modifiers, has an external flash tube and it's made in Switzerland, not China ;-)😄

    • @MarkusPix
      @MarkusPix  8 дней назад

      Ok, I will get one and check it out! Thank you.