On the technical front, they're probably quite similar. On the sound front, the ZSN Pro X is a very aggressive V-shape, the CRA is not far behind, but it's midrange is a bit more neutral (even if not to my taste) ZSN Pro X has some really wonky, grainy and yet also muffled treblet though, whilst the CRA is atleast only somewhat piercing. I'd reccomend you get CRA, but if you already have ZSN Pro X then you might wanna look to something higher up in the price range for an upgrade.
Tenho os dois. O ZSN PRO X tem mais volume, mais agudos (agudos que chegam a irritar em alto volume, agudos algumas vezes "cortantes") O CRA no geral é mais suave e pode ser ouvido por muito mais tempo sem cansar os ouvidos.
My CRA's feel cheap and anemic in comperison to BL-03, bass on BL is boomy , on CRA its punchy so they are not even in same ballpark. CRA's extended highs feel like combination of low res/distorted/shouty but I like the signature so ordered SSR.
@@he.236 Picked up SSR disappointed in that its nothing like CRA that its very average and not unique in any way. Basically a more expensive e500 . Vs BL-03, its similar sound signature and can be bassy with large tips but BL-03 are still better(premium). Never heard of E11c but my impression from brief searching is that they aren't relevant and 3 years old. Lumnerion posted new video comparing Ola to SSR, saying Ola better. Personally I would either try Tripowin Olina or not spend money and just EQ down bass on bl03 for cleaner sound.
@Donquixote Doflamingo Well TC-01 was update from bl03 but they couldn't last me 2 weeks without accident which was in part to how heavey they are. I got rid of SSR and bought $20 apple earbuds and basically life's kicking my ass, stopped caring about marginal improvements. I dont even mind using $10 jvc gumy HAF14. I wear them sideways.
Completely wrong bro these have clean bass it doesn't covers mids mids are nice and open vocals are great But one big disadvantage it had was the treble it's too peeky and harsh in some tracks that's the only downside it's better than Blon Bl03 and every iem under 30 dollars except Chu CRA is one of the best sounding one But I don't like the treble at all CRA is fairly clean and bright Don't look at graphs and be biased about it It has less mid bass than Blon Bl03 Blon sounds more fatty and Boomy mids are recessed as well
Obviously you haven't listened to the "good" IEMs(150~300bucks range). Compared to some really good ones, CRAs do have a lot of bass bleed and is no where near clean bass and its definition is not great. Although IMO for 15 bucks it's the best you're gonna get so no complaint here, just saying.
@@guybuddy1 LOL? My friend till now I own every single iem under $200 to 20 I have done so many reviews also I even have variations right now I already have Tin T3+ Aria Variations CCA CRA Moondrop CHU 7hz salnotes zero QKZ x HBB KZ EdX Ultra ZST X ZS10 pro ZSN pro X I also own headphones like AKG K361 Sennheiser HD58X Audio Technica M20x and M40x Dont tell me anything I know how a headphone or earphone should sound CRA is not bad treble is sharp or harsh But overall sound of CRA is very good I have nothing to complain aside treble
@@guybuddy1 CRA is not muddy You either never listened to it or you just don't know how it works CRA sounds better than 7hz salnotes zero overall even beating t3+ in certain songs
Hmm, I think I gave the CCA CRA a fair shake and didn't actively compare it to anything with higher price tags to demean it. The comparison to the KZ CRN was chosen due to its relevance, what with the close FR and KZ and CCA being one in the same, and even then I noted the CRA to be the overall winner despite the lower price tag. Whilst the KZ CRN is slightly more costly, I wouldn't put it in the premium segment. Indeed, more comparisons would be better of course. I would've loved to compare the CRA to the Moondrop Chu, had I had it. Ultimately, my ability to compare products spans only as far as what I have available, and what I have available at the price isn't of much relevance or being a good comparison point, thus was omitted. Even then, my viewership tends to prefer videos that didn't spill over the 20 minute mark, which with more comparisons the video would have gone over that point.
You've just watched the review for it. The CCA CRA is quite a nice find for its price, we'll have to see if the Moondrop Chu has anything to say about that in the future. If you do want a Moondrop that's decently available now, then the Quarks is still an excellent product with a lower profile housing. If you want something with a warmer, looser kind of sound, and a really nice build, you might want to check out the Auglamor F300 Light.
@@AmritSaroe it's better you buy some portable dac, there are so many usb dacs available for 1500 rupees. most IEM need dac to get their full potential
Very good job detailing the minute things others may miss out on. Ordered these to have something to try out while I wait for the Chus
These play my library excellently. I listen to hip hop and gaf about “audiophile” opinions.
Good review!
Review starts at 9:11
thanks 😂
Thanks
Remove the metallic nozzle filters and replace with 500/400 gauge felt/cloth filters to correct the treble.
Is kz zsn pro x is any good if we compare with CCA CRA ?
On the technical front, they're probably quite similar.
On the sound front, the ZSN Pro X is a very aggressive V-shape, the CRA is not far behind, but it's midrange is a bit more neutral (even if not to my taste)
ZSN Pro X has some really wonky, grainy and yet also muffled treblet though, whilst the CRA is atleast only somewhat piercing.
I'd reccomend you get CRA, but if you already have ZSN Pro X then you might wanna look to something higher up in the price range for an upgrade.
@@lumeri0n Thank you .
Tenho os dois. O ZSN PRO X tem mais volume, mais agudos (agudos que chegam a irritar em alto volume, agudos algumas vezes "cortantes")
O CRA no geral é mais suave e pode ser ouvido por muito mais tempo sem cansar os ouvidos.
My CRA's feel cheap and anemic in comperison to BL-03, bass on BL is boomy , on CRA its punchy so they are not even in same ballpark. CRA's extended highs feel like combination of low res/distorted/shouty but I like the signature so ordered SSR.
Ssr is better than blon n cra or e11c
E11c and ssr which is best
@@he.236 Picked up SSR disappointed in that its nothing like CRA that its very average and not unique in any way. Basically a more expensive e500 . Vs BL-03, its similar sound signature and can be bassy with large tips but BL-03 are still better(premium). Never heard of E11c but my impression from brief searching is that they aren't relevant and 3 years old. Lumnerion posted new video comparing Ola to SSR, saying Ola better. Personally I would either try Tripowin Olina or not spend money and just EQ down bass on bl03 for cleaner sound.
@Donquixote Doflamingo Well TC-01 was update from bl03 but they couldn't last me 2 weeks without accident which was in part to how heavey they are. I got rid of SSR and bought $20 apple earbuds and basically life's kicking my ass, stopped caring about marginal improvements. I dont even mind using $10 jvc gumy HAF14. I wear them sideways.
blon bl-03 sounds muffled sometimes but you can fix it with eq
Nice, was waiting for this.
Completely wrong bro these have clean bass it doesn't covers mids mids are nice and open vocals are great
But one big disadvantage it had was the treble it's too peeky and harsh in some tracks that's the only downside it's better than Blon Bl03 and every iem under 30 dollars except Chu
CRA is one of the best sounding one
But I don't like the treble at all
CRA is fairly clean and bright
Don't look at graphs and be biased about it
It has less mid bass than Blon Bl03
Blon sounds more fatty and Boomy mids are recessed as well
paajeet go use your mi basic earphone 🤣
Obviously you haven't listened to the "good" IEMs(150~300bucks range). Compared to some really good ones, CRAs do have a lot of bass bleed and is no where near clean bass and its definition is not great.
Although IMO for 15 bucks it's the best you're gonna get so no complaint here, just saying.
@@guybuddy1 LOL? My friend till now I own every single iem under $200 to 20 I have done so many reviews also I even have variations right now
I already have Tin T3+ Aria Variations CCA CRA Moondrop CHU 7hz salnotes zero QKZ x HBB KZ EdX Ultra ZST X ZS10 pro ZSN pro X
I also own headphones like AKG K361 Sennheiser HD58X Audio Technica M20x and M40x
Dont tell me anything
I know how a headphone or earphone should sound
CRA is not bad treble is sharp or harsh
But overall sound of CRA is very good I have nothing to complain aside treble
@@Smzxe you wish you did. lol
@@guybuddy1 CRA is not muddy
You either never listened to it or you just don't know how it works
CRA sounds better than 7hz salnotes zero overall even beating t3+ in certain songs
I have blon bl-03 and moondrop spaceship now which earphone buy for comfortable n good sound not bass head
I would perhaps check out the Moondrop Chu, or the Moondrop Quarks which I regard to be better then the Spaceship at a lesser price.
@@lumeri0n other company
@@he.236 kz zex is nice too
nice review
Any thing at $20 . Why are u even mentioned about any thing related to premium ??
Hmm, I think I gave the CCA CRA a fair shake and didn't actively compare it to anything with higher price tags to demean it.
The comparison to the KZ CRN was chosen due to its relevance, what with the close FR and KZ and CCA being one in the same, and even then I noted the CRA to be the overall winner despite the lower price tag. Whilst the KZ CRN is slightly more costly, I wouldn't put it in the premium segment.
Indeed, more comparisons would be better of course. I would've loved to compare the CRA to the Moondrop Chu, had I had it. Ultimately, my ability to compare products spans only as far as what I have available, and what I have available at the price isn't of much relevance or being a good comparison point, thus was omitted.
Even then, my viewership tends to prefer videos that didn't spill over the 20 minute mark, which with more comparisons the video would have gone over that point.
Cca cra or kz zex ..?
CRA
mario judah
lilith the second angel from the hit show neon genital erection (1995)
If i just want to buy an iem for good music and Netflix experience which one should I buy? Under $25
You've just watched the review for it. The CCA CRA is quite a nice find for its price, we'll have to see if the Moondrop Chu has anything to say about that in the future.
If you do want a Moondrop that's decently available now, then the Quarks is still an excellent product with a lower profile housing.
If you want something with a warmer, looser kind of sound, and a really nice build, you might want to check out the Auglamor F300 Light.
@@lumeri0n can you review KZ ZEX and compare that with CRA actually kz zex have better build quality and design CRA looks cheap
it also depends on the device you using.
@@greedyboi8431 redmi note 7 pro
@@AmritSaroe it's better you buy some portable dac, there are so many usb dacs available for 1500 rupees. most IEM need dac to get their full potential
Squared face dude. 😂