US is Testing Brand New B-52s To Fly For A Full Century

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • Having made its first flight during the Cold War era, the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress continues to perform strategic missions into the 21st century.
    Having successfully stood the test of time and technology, the legendary bomber has proven its reliability and adaptability in ever-changing military environments around the world, becoming a symbol of strength and intimidation.
    But can numerous upgrades extend the B-52’s service life by another 50 years?
    Let’s find that out right now!

Комментарии • 201

  • @navysailor
    @navysailor 19 дней назад +42

    My dad flew on the B-52's in the 1960's as a Crew Chief. He's sadly is gone on but that plane he crewed in still goes on.

    • @BenBasile-y7b
      @BenBasile-y7b 18 дней назад +4

      I salute your Dad

    • @MrBonediver
      @MrBonediver 18 дней назад +4

      As did mine!!!!

    • @user-ni2zo5zo3c
      @user-ni2zo5zo3c 22 часа назад +1

      My gratitude to your father for his service to our country. My condolences to you and your family in his passing. My fervent appreciation to you for your serving in the Navy. I urge you to write a book on his and your respective duties in those times.

  • @pitsnipe5559
    @pitsnipe5559 18 дней назад +23

    I once met a young officer who was the command pilot of the same B52 her father piloted. Amazing aircraft.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 14 дней назад +3

      "Her" father piloted? I guess Hellen Reddy's song had an impact. Good for her, these primitive, outdated, biblical ideas about woman may finally be at an end. My sister's friend Flys a Grumman COD off aircraft carriers. You've come a long way baby.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 14 дней назад +2

      I got that wrong, Cod is the mission of the plane, it's name is the Grumman Greyhound. It's used to bring mail supplies and people to and from the carrier. Basically a puggy version of The E2C without the dish on top.

  • @michaelhayden725
    @michaelhayden725 18 дней назад +13

    As I understand it some of these H models are being flown by the grandsons and granddaughters of the men who first flew them. Incredible service length.

  • @elrobo3568
    @elrobo3568 15 дней назад +7

    I was a crew chief on F-4's and was on the "end of runway" crew so I got to be at the end of the runway when the B-52's took off and landed. I loved when they turned the landing gear to crab for landing in cross wind. Being under them at take off was a moving experience.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 14 дней назад

      @elrobo3568 F4 fathom, F4F Wildcat, F4u Corsair? So many planes have had that designation, if a B52 was involved it had to be the the Fanthom, since the others were WW2 planes

    • @Stylus-ms4cv
      @Stylus-ms4cv 5 дней назад

      Was ground crew park em pump em and inspect and call your specialists then put em to bed so preflight crews can get em ready for flight crews and launch

  • @sammyvh11
    @sammyvh11 18 дней назад +24

    The B52 and A10 must never be removed from service.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 14 дней назад +1

      I have a pix of my best friend next to an A10 Warthog at Mcguire AirForce base at an air show featuring The Blue Angels. The A10, like the Grumman F14, were both made right here on Long Island. Grumman and Republic are sadly out of business. My Father was supervisor of tool and die at Grumman. My uncle worked at Republic. The A10 was named the Thunderbolt 2, in honor of the p47 Thunderbolt. The pilots renamed it Warthog because they felt it was not attractive!

    • @protorhinocerator142
      @protorhinocerator142 10 дней назад

      @@RobertGraziose But if you're a soldier in the field and the enemy is closing in, some A-10's showing up and going BRRRRRRR against the enemy is more beautiful than Marylin Monroe in her prime.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 10 дней назад

      @@protorhinocerator142 did you know that the plane was designed around that gatling gun?

    • @protorhinocerator142
      @protorhinocerator142 10 дней назад

      @@RobertGraziose Absolutely.
      We need a big ol' gun that goes BRRRRRR.
      Oh, and make it fly somehow.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 10 дней назад

      @protorhinocerator142 The gun was around, they needed a platform to deliver it. You ever see the videos where they decimate a truck with a 3 second burst from the A 10?

  • @politicsuncensored5617
    @politicsuncensored5617 19 дней назад +25

    What is truly amazing about the B-52 is that it first took flight in 1952 - a year before I was born & will be flying long after I am gone. I do hope Boeing gets their act together. They have produced some of the greatest aircraft to fly. Shalom

    • @navysailor
      @navysailor 18 дней назад +1

      Yes the war was one by the B-17, B-24 form Boeing. As well as that great British Bomber the Lancaster.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 14 дней назад

      @politicsuncensored5617 Is Boing having problems? I know that spacecraft they sent up weeks ago stranded the crew. NASA is going to have to rescue them. But are they having other problems?

    • @politicsuncensored5617
      @politicsuncensored5617 13 дней назад +2

      @@RobertGraziose You have not watched any videos of the problems with the Boeing passenger aircraft? Problems over the past couple years with parts failing, falling off during flight, including engines. Where have you been during this time? Shalom

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 13 дней назад

      @politicsuncensored5617 Yea I have seen that stuff, the one where the whole top of the airplane was sad, they said a flight attendant was sucker's out. I did know all of these planes were all made by them. Me and the news lately are like the Paul Simon song "The Only Living Boy In New York," "I get the news I need on the weather report. I can gather all the news I need on the weather report"
      I guess I outgrew my morbid curiosity.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 13 дней назад

      @politicsuncensored5617 You did see that space rocket right? It messed up and a "Three Hour Tour", has turned into nightmare for those astronauts. They were supposed to come right away, now NASA will have to rescue them, I think months from now.

  • @eugenefleming1614
    @eugenefleming1614 20 дней назад +36

    Papa Buff lives forever🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍👍👍😁😎

  • @Dakotaman2003
    @Dakotaman2003 17 дней назад +4

    Ain't nothing ugly about this majestically beautiful bird!

  • @JeanManson-if1lr
    @JeanManson-if1lr 19 дней назад +18

    I WILL BE LONG BURID AND RETURNED TO DUST BEFORE THIS AIRCRAFT LANDS FOR THE LAST TIME…..GOD SPEED GRANDPA…PROTECTOR OF AMERICA AND HER ALLIES….GOD SPEED….❤

    • @user-ds6nh8nj3c
      @user-ds6nh8nj3c 15 дней назад +3

      The A-10&the B -52 should never be put in the scrap yard I’m a military brat be smart and keep them😊

  • @chrisnsefu
    @chrisnsefu 16 дней назад +6

    The B52 is simply a classic.Ageless,ever new,more deadly

  • @Bduh2
    @Bduh2 20 дней назад +16

    By far my favorite military airplane not to dish on the F-22s or the C-xx airplanes but I was able to see one at the Pima Air & Space Museum in Arizona. What an incredible airplane!

    • @cassandratq9301
      @cassandratq9301 19 дней назад +3

      A monster - which epitomizes American strength.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 14 дней назад +1

      @Bduh2 I have a picture here of me under a static display of a decommissiond B52 at the AirForce academy in Colorado. Shows how big this plane is.

  • @myfavoritemartian1
    @myfavoritemartian1 18 дней назад +10

    *** Being a Boeing project makes it suspicious to me. Boeing: "No job too big, no fee too big"

    • @markymark959
      @markymark959 16 дней назад

      Boing has gone downhill and needs to be redone top to bottom….

  • @garygarrett1917
    @garygarrett1917 20 дней назад +16

    The military has tried to replace the B-52 since the day it was placed in service.
    "Can't do it"

  • @louiegibbs2518
    @louiegibbs2518 7 дней назад +2

    I was crew chief on the b52d model during vetinam. GUAM AND OKINAWA. FLEW ON SOME MISSIONS WITH MY PLANE. NOT FOR ANYONE WHO CAN NOT STAND BEING IN TIGHT PLACES. I TRUST THE OLD BUFF

  • @dhroman4564
    @dhroman4564 20 дней назад +43

    Putting new engines on the BUFF doesn't make it brand new.

    • @DonAbrams-hq7ln
      @DonAbrams-hq7ln 19 дней назад +7

      What about the other modifications, she's not the same bird

    • @windforward9810
      @windforward9810 19 дней назад +5

      They have just about replaced everything on buff more than once, rebuilt to J that is a lot of rebuilds. Some mods the stripped the skin off on some at some point to check for damages.

    • @CMZballofficial-2712
      @CMZballofficial-2712 18 дней назад +3

      It works tho

    • @mikewalsh1402
      @mikewalsh1402 18 дней назад +7

      No one said it would be a new plane, it has evolved over the years, and overall it’s nothing like the original B-52.

    • @roark1138-
      @roark1138- 16 дней назад +2

      ​@@mikewalsh1402the TITLE says it😂

  • @colinstevens8968
    @colinstevens8968 20 дней назад +12

    Superb UK Rolls Royce engines on board now.

    • @mothmagic1
      @mothmagic1 19 дней назад +2

      Actually Rolls Royce USA which means th UK will see no benefit from this contract

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad 12 дней назад

      @@mothmagic1 There had to be a catch to it . . .

  • @KevinHochstatter
    @KevinHochstatter 20 дней назад +14

    I cannot imagine any of our new bombers lasting 100 years unless that was part of the design criteria...

    • @ssaraccoii
      @ssaraccoii 19 дней назад +3

      Like all old, dependable aircraft, it was designed with slide rules, manual math, and manual drafting. The advent of CAD began the slide to engineering exactly to specifications and not real-world likelihoods and conditions.

    • @TheNortheastAl
      @TheNortheastAl 11 дней назад

      @@ssaraccoiiThe Slide rule got us to the moon and back too. 55 years ago and we still are having an effort getting back.

    • @alexrebmann1253
      @alexrebmann1253 11 дней назад

      ​@@ssaraccoiiThe original rough design was done by 3 Boeing engineers in a hotel room in Ohio and used balsa wood to carve a model.

  • @jamesrhodes377
    @jamesrhodes377 15 дней назад +1

    I was a crew member on the buff ten years ago and my eyes light up every time i see one.

  • @stealthg35infiniti94
    @stealthg35infiniti94 19 дней назад +15

    Is it really necessary to create a Stupid Photo Shop of 12 engine BUFF. It's just insulting.

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad 12 дней назад +1

      @WindsurferHD Sometimes it's essential to criticise stupidity . . .

    • @louiegibbs2518
      @louiegibbs2518 7 дней назад

      It does not have 12 engines has 8 felt safer on that plane than any commercial plane made

  • @josephsanchez262
    @josephsanchez262 18 дней назад +6

    They are the coolest looking bombers to me

  • @cassandratq9301
    @cassandratq9301 19 дней назад +6

    This video was fascinating to a novice like myself, thank you.

  • @HeirloomGameCalls
    @HeirloomGameCalls 17 дней назад +4

    The Buff is tired but she keeps on keeping on. I was a crewchief on them
    Would LOVE to see how one built with Modern Materials and practices would perform. Lighter weight, better fuel economy and longer range. IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES. The ONLY limit is someone's check book.
    I

  • @davidw2204
    @davidw2204 18 дней назад +4

    I imagine that there will be very few crewed aircraft in the military fleet by 2050.

  • @richardhenry1742
    @richardhenry1742 20 дней назад +5

    I enjoy your content it's both interesting and exciting. I like to see the growth and power of the USA military. Thank you.

  • @johnmaynard3445
    @johnmaynard3445 10 дней назад +1

    Station at KAFB Mi. in the early 60's, we had F106 & B52's. I worked on the 6's, but what was interesting the F106 used 1 truck to load fuel, and the B52 used many trucks to load fuel.

  • @ChrisPowellMerleApAmber
    @ChrisPowellMerleApAmber 15 дней назад +1

    Every time a B-52 launches, the Earth's orbit perturbs and its spin is either slowed or sped up. Gads they're heavy beasts! And that's before adding payload!

  • @robertvincent5859
    @robertvincent5859 17 дней назад +2

    I never heard any "Mud Marine" turn down an "Arc light" when the nva was breathing down their neck!!!!

  • @NathanPurvis-hm8nc
    @NathanPurvis-hm8nc 18 дней назад +4

    I'll never understand how they can retire planes like the F-117 or SR-71 and talk about retiring the F-22 and maybe the B-2 at the same time as upgrading this old bird. Crazy logic!

    • @jamesbowen2105
      @jamesbowen2105 18 дней назад +1

      B2 was a FUBAR money pit.
      The redt never really had more than niche use.
      B52 is comparably a practical, utilitarian platform with multiple misdion.use and has been upgraded and modernised repeatedly.
      Apparently it can still be upped to ever-changing needs.
      It alsobwas dedigned ehrn Boeing was really Boeing.

    • @adrianpoole9201
      @adrianpoole9201 17 дней назад +2

      ​@@jamesbowen2105Any chance you can slow down typing on your keyboard. It avoids writing a complete load of incoherent bollocks.

    • @jamesbowen2105
      @jamesbowen2105 17 дней назад

      @adrianpoole9201 sorry, the B2 was an obsolete money pit before production was canceled.
      F117 likewise was nonfunctional in its original role before limited production was started.
      F22 has been superseded by its modular descendants on the same platform.
      Only the B52 pergotmef ad intended and witj multi versatile utility, with a sound original design that has been proven capable of being upgraded and modernized repeatedly.
      It also was dedigned by the real BOEING Corporation before it was integrated into McDonnell Douglas group.

    • @ChrisPowellMerleApAmber
      @ChrisPowellMerleApAmber 15 дней назад +1

      Add, it's so big Atlas himself could be mounted to one and they'd still have space left over. Before it's done I wouldn't be surprised to see a Megawatt laser weapon system integration b4 retirement.

    • @dr.jamesolack8504
      @dr.jamesolack8504 12 дней назад

      @@jamesbowen2105
      What is meant by ‘pergotmef ad’??

  • @MrBonediver
    @MrBonediver 18 дней назад +2

    My dad worked on this while in TAC and SAC!!

  • @johngould7795
    @johngould7795 20 дней назад +9

    Russia,China - watch this!

    • @luisbustamante9869
      @luisbustamante9869 6 дней назад

      They don't have to. China builds roads instead of bombers and they are building a spiderweb around the US and their ME ally.

  • @marvinbush9330
    @marvinbush9330 8 дней назад

    I am so happy for the B-52. I can remember when she first became a shiny new part of the U.S. Air Force and I wish for her many more active years in the future.

  • @silverhammer7779
    @silverhammer7779 19 дней назад +4

    Just build updated versions of the basic aircraft. But they won't, because that makes too much sense.

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 18 дней назад +1

      It actually does not make that much sense. These aircraft have very limited application in that they can only be used against tier 3 adversaries, where the US can establish air superiority and suppress integrated air defense networks. For most other adversaries, stealth has become essential and the B-1B and even the B-2 is no longer stealthy enough, so the Air Force knows it must upgrade to the B-21 to fight more capable adversaries. There are only about 75 B52s left in service, and that is probable all you need for tier 3 opponents, and it does not make sense to spend money on an updated B52 because of the small numbers needed, and the F-35 was so much more expensive than it was supposed to be, that the Air Force simply does not have the budget to design and build 75 more advanced B-52, and to continue to buy F-35s and B-21s. These newer aircraft are far more expensive to purchase and operate than they were supposed to be, so the budget simply does not allow them to take these side roads.

  • @melchurmoreau5677
    @melchurmoreau5677 2 дня назад

    That's how it supposed to be, don't retire those planes, is just modernized and maintained them and good to go, that's why America is the best in the world!

  • @kenschaub4119
    @kenschaub4119 19 дней назад +3

    These things have been re-skinned a couple of times,re-engined a bunch, avionics replaced and replaced again, the electronic warfare officer of 20 years ago would not recognize the gizmos on board now. Subsonic and not particularly stealthy, The plane keeps on ticking. I wonder if they still have the retractable iron sight at the center of the cockpit window in case all else fails. ( not kidding. They were there. Probably still are)

  • @Philc231
    @Philc231 18 дней назад +3

    Forget the green house gas bs . Until these people stop using heat for their homes , gas for their cars and stop flying I don’t want to hear it

  • @348indian
    @348indian 6 дней назад

    Just like the A-10, the B-52 was created and designed to serve a particular both, and both planes exceeded expectations. With modern upgrades, they will carry on serving the purpose they were designed for.

  • @normsti000
    @normsti000 18 дней назад +2

    It's a great, old plane..... old plane. Maybe, just maybe, we should start planning a replacement for it. A big, modern great new plane.

  • @raymond7880
    @raymond7880 18 дней назад +2

    As long as these design changes are properly thought through and executed given Boeing's recent record. They're screwing up regularly.

  • @rvnmedic1968
    @rvnmedic1968 11 дней назад

    Rome, New York (former Griffiss AFB) had a tornado recently that damaged quite a few buildings and churches downtown. Amazingly, the twister was so strong it moved the static B52 display off of the stanchions onto the grass.
    On my first day in Vietnam (377th USAF Dispensary E.R.) I was on the night shift and talking to another medic when the windows started rattling and minor floor vibrations. I was told it was BUFFs working out about 20 miles away. Hotel Sierra!
    Cheers, Bob Powell, CMSgt, USAF(Ret)

  • @fredboat
    @fredboat 12 часов назад

    Thanks , Enjoyed, Have been able to look inside a B52 at a few airshows over the years. One hell of an aircraft.

  • @mikeday62
    @mikeday62 8 дней назад

    When an average citizen can afford one of these beauties...life will get much more fun!

  • @wallywalpamur4951
    @wallywalpamur4951 20 дней назад +8

    Where's the 10/12 engine version shown in the pic? I enjoyed the video but you bs to viewers for clicks. 👎

  • @gillavoie8501
    @gillavoie8501 10 дней назад

    I refueled these amazing aircraft in the early 60's. Love to see them still flying.

  • @carlthornton3076
    @carlthornton3076 3 дня назад

    I worked at Columbus AFB when the B-52s were there. I worked on the new longer runway in 1968... Carl Thornton

  • @warrenholmes3311
    @warrenholmes3311 18 дней назад +2

    On the 'cover' of this video, to attract you, it shows a ground troop of maintainers, with a BUFF that is carrying 12 engines (3 propulsion pods per wing) when normally there are two propulsion pods with two engines -- on EACH wing, making it an 8-engined aircraft. That alone should show you that this is a load and the authors -- not much better (if at all)!

  • @aseriesguy
    @aseriesguy 10 дней назад

    "Brand new" B-52s? Something of an overstatement. Curb your enthusiasm.

  • @edcew8236
    @edcew8236 19 дней назад +1

    Loop hose refueling? That's not the picture... "Eight twin engines..." sort of...

  • @greggholman547
    @greggholman547 19 дней назад +1

    Being in SAC for 3 and a half years KAFB,MI get a little teary eyed seeing B 52's flying , I was 18 year old in aircraft electric shop ugly planes lol

  • @tundralou
    @tundralou 3 дня назад

    As a Structures mech. I havent heard of any really great upgrades to the main spars and associated structures

  • @Paul-if1dr
    @Paul-if1dr 9 дней назад

    A flight of these would end the war in both the Middle East and Ukraine

  • @johnprice1700
    @johnprice1700 7 дней назад

    Nothing new here. When I worked with the DoD Ageing Aircraft program twenty years ago, the Air Force announced they planned to fly the B-52 until it was 100 years old.

  • @thomasm.rodgers9020
    @thomasm.rodgers9020 18 дней назад +1

    Did Tect School on B-52. Chanute. Westover AFB Headquarters 8th Air Force SAC. KC-135 Sgt Ground Crew, launch&recovery. No Hero's, but you can sleep tight my little baby's. Pease the old fashion way!!

  • @russvoight1167
    @russvoight1167 12 дней назад +1

    The B-36 and B-47 preceded the B-52, not the B-29

  • @dtaylor2623
    @dtaylor2623 14 дней назад

    A major player in ending the Vietnam War and not even mentioned! Conventional weapons had a major role in it's past and should have been mentioned. I worked with them at Utapao Thailand in 1969-1970.

  • @russvoight1167
    @russvoight1167 12 дней назад

    Going from 8 to 4 engines would require a full rebuild of the wings. As told to me by a B-52 crew chief

  • @robertgamble0
    @robertgamble0 19 дней назад +1

    Thank you Sir !

  • @Qreur
    @Qreur 5 дней назад

    What a Beautiful aircraft!.... close, but not there, to the Warthog...

  • @theodorecarlin296
    @theodorecarlin296 8 дней назад

    Sometimes the government gets things right. This time they maxed getting it right by not ordering unneeded and superfluous things.

  • @antonkosmas7179
    @antonkosmas7179 День назад

    US must keep those aircrafts B52 and A10 they are very powerful aircrafts

  • @brealistic3542
    @brealistic3542 20 дней назад +2

    They just don't make um like they use to.

  • @thekat9593
    @thekat9593 11 дней назад

    This picture is wrong, the engines are supposed to be turned the other way around

  • @arth.4196
    @arth.4196 19 дней назад +1

    Yes let those know what they can expect 👊👊👊👊👊👊👊

  • @jimsanders4412
    @jimsanders4412 11 дней назад

    If it still does the job, why not keep it around?!👍😄

  • @user-nm8wv6it4v
    @user-nm8wv6it4v 15 дней назад

    I hope the new engines don’t put the B52 out of Balance.

  • @kevinthompson2111
    @kevinthompson2111 18 дней назад

    Truly a site to see seen one in side and outside huge plain😅

  • @306champion
    @306champion 11 дней назад

    I am sure the thumb nail for this flick showed THREE pairs of engines per wing ( meaning twelve engines all up ). You're full of it.

  • @turbo-bike7999
    @turbo-bike7999 17 дней назад

    Finally retiring Puff and Weeze and installing first class Rolls Royce Allison engines is the way to go! Woo hoo!!!

  • @rickluttrell5529
    @rickluttrell5529 9 дней назад

    The only Boeing aircraft I have any confidence in anymore. Don’t F this up too Boeing.

  • @user-gh2ff3yn4j
    @user-gh2ff3yn4j 7 дней назад

    Why the hell didn't they get upgraded Pratt engines?

  • @goodday5570
    @goodday5570 20 дней назад +1

    Where is the massive drone force. its time , we know how.

  • @russellarmer-ml1ir
    @russellarmer-ml1ir 12 дней назад

    from what i can gather this is just a made over b52 in other words same air frame just new equipment

  • @ulaysoe6742
    @ulaysoe6742 15 дней назад

    What about metal fatigue of wings,fuselage.

  • @budhealey3020
    @budhealey3020 19 дней назад +1

    No, but new avionics do!

  • @olddog103
    @olddog103 19 дней назад +2

    LOVED WATCHING BUFFY PICKLING OFF NAPE AND SNAKE IN THE VALLEYS AROUND DANANG,,,TRULY FUKING AWESOME….VETERANS FOR TRUMP-VANCE 2024 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @theodorecarlin296
    @theodorecarlin296 8 дней назад

    Going built this long before boing started Have problems like flying apart in mid sir. Keep in mind the landed it after part of it landed before the rest of the plane did. Never sit close to a door or anything that looks like one.

  • @jimcushman5060
    @jimcushman5060 16 дней назад

    Just a great old work horse🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @user-ni2zo5zo3c
    @user-ni2zo5zo3c 22 часа назад

    David R Lentz, Columbus, Ohio, USA (Thursday, 12 September, 2024)
    You start with giving us an immensely interesting historical look during apprehensive times with a remarkable physical symbol of our constant vigilance and readiness as deterrence, the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress USAF Strategic Bomber. At 1:50, you show how in 1957 another element of that process, the means to refuel in flight our long-legged guardian, had come into operational use.
    Oddly enough, at 2:08, you show footage of President Harry S. Truman (who well prior to that date had left office) meeting with the dictator Jozef Stalin, who in 1953 had died. Such errors of composition, editing, fact checking, etc., quite trouble me, for they fail to match the flow of actual events. The very essence of historical chronicling and journalistic reportage is accuracy in fact. In other words, truth.

  • @mikercflyer7383
    @mikercflyer7383 6 дней назад

    Ist it an easy target for anti aircraft long range missiles?

  • @justinhaslam-lucas8711
    @justinhaslam-lucas8711 20 дней назад +2

    Mr WATOP!!!

  • @American_Made
    @American_Made 20 дней назад +3

    Trump made sure this plane will live on for a long time.

  • @colinmiller5502
    @colinmiller5502 17 дней назад +1

    Could you get someone other than Kermit the frog to narrate ?

  • @randyhance4477
    @randyhance4477 11 дней назад

    The last BUFF pilot has yet to be born

  • @ackack612
    @ackack612 13 дней назад

    LISTEN UP! There will never, EVER be a fleet wide program to replace the engines on the B-52. NEVER, EVER for one simple reason: the aircraft simply do not fly enough hours annually to justify the cost. Retaining and maintaining the current engines being much more cost effective. PERIOD, FULL STOP.

  • @outsider7658
    @outsider7658 8 дней назад

    BTW, at 7.59, it's not "left" wing, it's the right one!
    Make a rewrite in facts.
    Just a thought.

  • @55nsmooth
    @55nsmooth 14 дней назад

    Brand new ENGINES, not "brand new B-52s".

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 6 дней назад

    There are ZERO "brand new" B-52s.
    ONLY THE ENGINES ARE BRAND NEW (and maybe some of the electronics).

  • @nathanthompson3401
    @nathanthompson3401 19 дней назад

    Middle of the next century? 2150? El Toro Caca!

  • @colinmccann7123
    @colinmccann7123 11 дней назад

    These are not new planes these are rebuilt and updated planes !!!

  • @billhenchen3392
    @billhenchen3392 17 дней назад

    Great Bomber for years but flying it with the modern anti aircraft weapons that China and Russia has today makes me wonder if the plane is still suitable for today's wars .

  • @ed-jf3xh
    @ed-jf3xh 5 дней назад

    Flying, not fat.

  • @lawrencewiddis2447
    @lawrencewiddis2447 11 дней назад

    So it goes a little faster. So what? If you don’t control the skies…

  • @jpajpaassi6614
    @jpajpaassi6614 20 дней назад +2

    🕉 Satyameva Jayate: Truth and Honesty and Reality gets created when Good Thoughts, Good Deeds, Good Acts are allowed to achieve the small steps needed for the correct choices and correct decisions to be made. Satyameva Jayate

  • @user-is7up6ln6m
    @user-is7up6ln6m 13 дней назад

    I love 8 engines

  • @derekhutton9855
    @derekhutton9855 18 дней назад

    Naceller? Surely you mean nacelle?

  • @Jaysqualityparts
    @Jaysqualityparts 18 дней назад

    The only time that the taxpayers really got our money’s worth.

  • @bradart7289
    @bradart7289 11 дней назад

    Humanity continues to destroy humanity !!

  • @larrysorenson4789
    @larrysorenson4789 8 дней назад

    Your photo shop first image is just silly. Not going to listen to article.

  • @sharonburmeister4149
    @sharonburmeister4149 3 дня назад

    Not enough money to buy new, next generation planes?

  • @SolarMillUSA
    @SolarMillUSA 10 дней назад

    Brand new is a lie. The last B-52 (H) airframe was laid down in 1962, 62 years ago! No 'brand new' ones have been made. It's an overhaul and a refit.

  • @gailmrutland6508
    @gailmrutland6508 20 дней назад +2

    *Air-frame fatigue??????*

    • @DonAbrams-hq7ln
      @DonAbrams-hq7ln 19 дней назад

      Well engineered, not using old airframes

    • @RogerSutton-pz8lf
      @RogerSutton-pz8lf 18 дней назад +1

      They have been upgraded and overhauled many times. This was in part to relieve stress and improve structural support.