Would be nice to see China have a greater understanding and appreciation for what Sg brought to China. Deng decided to open China up after seeing how we managed to advance so quickly, and this industrial park collaboration soon followed after. This isn't to say China owes us anything or that we should be credited for what China is today, but it would be good if it became more known to the Chinese the part we played in their history.
We only credited Mr.Lee Kuan Yew as a great man helping China in the past but not Singapore's foreign policy today as the US lapdog.....2016 SCS dispute and fully support Ukraine in 2022.
@@jimmylam9846By Western standards, Singapore is a great violator of so called human rights. They are afraid of US overthrowing the PAP regime under excuse of so called human rights and lack of democracy. This explain why they need to accept the role of lap dog.
@@jimmylam9846 The way i see it, if it wasn't for ASEAN firm commitment to staying natural, which Singapore plays a significant role, East & SE Asia could ended up like Ukraine and Europe. In SCS and Ukraine, Singapore was against the forceful actions that was used. Singapore was always on the side of, we can talk it out but how could we talk if you start throwing punches.
@@jimmylam9846 Neutral Policy only equals Lapdog in the useless logic of pro-china keyboard wolf warriors with no brains nor honour. Piss off with your nonsense rhetoric before you get a POFMA. Although perhaps, i should be more encouraging of your senseless foreign influence campaign. The more you lie about Singapore, cause trouble for our neighbours and slander us Southeast Asians for refusing to become your modern day vassals, the wider our eyes will open. The more you try to tighten your grip on your neighbours, the faster we will begin to wake up and see you for the ruthless coloniser wannabes you are. When that day comes, you will face a second century of humiliation as your imperialist ambitions will be halted at the feet of ASEAN.
China and US are Singapore's leading trading partners. The difference is the trade balance - surplus of $55b with China and deficit of $9b with the US.
Alot of diplomatic nice talks. No mention of why Singapore has stepped back from being a major shareholder in the joint venture at the beginning to becoming a minority one.
@@marinhopaais426 so has America copied from Germany, Britain, France in the 1960s....and Japanese from Ford Motor, and the European tech.. Some people can't even innovate , still slumming away ...🤣🤣🤣 By the way , you eat pasta, the Chinese invented it was called noodles, Chinese ramen and you use porcelain? Drink tea? Wear silk? Use 5G? Use crossbows? Compass? These are the inventions by the Chinese...so don't give me the crap that others don't copy from China . People innovate . The lift aka elevator was a French invention ..so your country also copy it?
There would be better accountability and transparency if annual profit margins for Suzhou and Tianjin Industrial Parks are disclosed to all Singaporeans.
Thanks to have this documentary. This is very good example of what cantonese said " have trainee, no master"..Singapore trained Suzou to replace Singapore😅. CCP have a big laugh.
Oh lastChang, not sure if you're indian, pinoy or American wanabee. But could be likely an indian troll. Maybe you should watch about your clean the air first in your capital city before even commenting about China. Lol.
@lastChang luckily the Singaporeans are fortunate enough to reduce their stake in the SIP so now they are able to stand and watch what happens to China without too much worries as they’re no longer major players. 😛
Looks like SG hasn't learnt the lessons from this saga. Was the project a success in terms of collaboration with PRC? No amount of spinning can change the fact that SG got a raw deal.
My good chum it is the most elementary of motives; self interest. Singaporean companies own stakes in a lot of the properties and companies, which they got to set up under some beneficial policies such as discounted land, lower taxes, etc etc. Singapore benefits when those companies and properties generate value. Which essentially means that both are on the same line.
Lee Kuan Yew stepped down from PM in 1990, then took on the role of developing a "second-wing" for Singapore. Think of it like expanding our geographical land, but overseas. Initial stake was 65% and China 35%. The local officials sabotaged the project and LKY complained openly all the way to Beijing. Then Singapore reduced its stake from 65% to 35% instead of pulling out entirely. Once China got back 65% all the "problems" were removed. Singapore learned a hard lesson at the government level of doing business with China.
@@solaris5655 Exactly! Honestly cannot trust the Chinese in terms of business collaboration, most will try and cut you out eventually. Been working and living in China for 15+ years, about 6 years in Suzhou, watching the SIP changing from an industrial/economics based concept to a residential heavy reality, a direct reflection of what the Chinese wants: Fast Money!!! Also seeing the SND area slowly grinding towards an eventual downfall, exacerbated by the terrible economic factors in China post-COVID and ongoing geopolitical & economic tensions. Somehow, knowing that SND will eventually fail kind of make me smile inside 😂 😂
when nation help another nation in a win win situation, we improve lives and strengthen relationships on both sides.
really interesting partnership between china and singapore . Hope both countries can maintain a good and strong relationship in long coming future
Good example of win-win cooperation in spite of ideology differences
Would be nice to see China have a greater understanding and appreciation for what Sg brought to China. Deng decided to open China up after seeing how we managed to advance so quickly, and this industrial park collaboration soon followed after. This isn't to say China owes us anything or that we should be credited for what China is today, but it would be good if it became more known to the Chinese the part we played in their history.
We only credited Mr.Lee Kuan Yew as a great man helping China in the past but not Singapore's foreign policy today as the US lapdog.....2016 SCS dispute and fully support Ukraine in 2022.
@@jimmylam9846 lol , u need to take your medicine bro.
@@jimmylam9846By Western standards, Singapore is a great violator of so called human rights. They are afraid of US overthrowing the PAP regime under excuse of so called human rights and lack of democracy. This explain why they need to accept the role of lap dog.
@@jimmylam9846 The way i see it, if it wasn't for ASEAN firm commitment to staying natural, which Singapore plays a significant role, East & SE Asia could ended up like Ukraine and Europe. In SCS and Ukraine, Singapore was against the forceful actions that was used. Singapore was always on the side of, we can talk it out but how could we talk if you start throwing punches.
@@jimmylam9846 Neutral Policy only equals Lapdog in the useless logic of pro-china keyboard wolf warriors with no brains nor honour. Piss off with your nonsense rhetoric before you get a POFMA. Although perhaps, i should be more encouraging of your senseless foreign influence campaign. The more you lie about Singapore, cause trouble for our neighbours and slander us Southeast Asians for refusing to become your modern day vassals, the wider our eyes will open. The more you try to tighten your grip on your neighbours, the faster we will begin to wake up and see you for the ruthless coloniser wannabes you are. When that day comes, you will face a second century of humiliation as your imperialist ambitions will be halted at the feet of ASEAN.
This is why s'pore has a first-world PAP govt ranked the most effective in the world.❤
❤❤❤
China and US are Singapore's leading trading partners. The difference is the trade balance - surplus of $55b with China and deficit of $9b with the US.
Due to our weapon purchase from the us
Now this is good international relations!!!
I hope johor is watching, the JSSEZ needs to be led by Singapore if it wants to have the highest chance for success
Am surprised that this channel is talking positively about China
Did you expect American propaganda?
@ I’ve been watching been watching them quite recently and in most cases they parrot the American narrative
Really hope they succeed. Can finally have affordable drugs again
Chinese helping Chinese
华夏一家亲。
Haha..wrong..cantonese said "have trainee, no master".. Suzou gonna overtake Singapore.😅
中国🤝新加坡 合作共赢的典范
Nice to learn something new❤ loved shopping at the Singapore airport lol
Alot of diplomatic nice talks.
No mention of why Singapore has stepped back from being a major shareholder in the joint venture at the beginning to becoming a minority one.
After Suzhou industrial investment, CPF cannot draw out.
Asia's is risen
We suggest DBS to move it's regional HQ to China. That's LIFE 🧬
🇸🇬🇨🇳👍👍👍
What is Singapore really gaining financially from this?
World's largest market
@@directxxxx71 I highly doubt it Chinese do copycat everything.
哪个国家不抄？！你告诉我！谁好就向谁学习，这个道理很难理解吗！？@@marinhopaais426
@@marinhopaais426
so has America copied from Germany, Britain, France in the 1960s....and Japanese from Ford Motor, and the European tech..
Some people can't even innovate , still slumming away ...🤣🤣🤣
By the way , you eat pasta, the Chinese invented it was called noodles, Chinese ramen and you use porcelain? Drink tea? Wear silk? Use 5G? Use crossbows? Compass? These are the inventions by the Chinese...so don't give me the crap that others don't copy from China . People innovate .
The lift aka elevator was a French invention ..so your country also copy it?
@@marinhopaais426you are so short-sighted
What is city what is IP? Know the difference
Why Singapore doesn't invite China to establish a naval base in Singapore? why only USA can threaten Chinese lifeline in Strait of Malacca?
RED means Prosperity 😁
Greetings, When the West does not interfere in the cooperation and development of Asia.
a realty suzhou, sez, btn china +singapore took 30 years _ another 10 yrs...m'sia n sg TALK TALK TALK sez but zip... never happened
Bt one hs t look at the mny oth intve that tk off.
What are you yapping about bro?
@@meganuke9091 m'sia all talk; no way will sez b a realty with sg...flip flop govt.. won't pay up..
30 years, how about showing some transpancy - disclose the Profit Margins fr om 1st to the 30th year ?
There would be better accountability and transparency if annual profit margins for Suzhou and Tianjin Industrial Parks are disclosed to all Singaporeans.
Capitaland is divesting assets in China. Schizo?
Thanks to have this documentary. This is very good example of what cantonese said " have trainee, no master"..Singapore trained Suzou to replace Singapore😅. CCP have a big laugh.
History has taught us: when you make friends with China 🇨🇳, it always takes advantage of you.
Oh lastChang, not sure if you're indian, pinoy or American wanabee. But could be likely an indian troll. Maybe you should watch about your clean the air first in your capital city before even commenting about China. Lol.
Ukraine: CHINA SO EVIL. The West only takes my life when I make friends with them.
Henry Kissinger once say, "To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal".
@lastChang luckily the Singaporeans are fortunate enough to reduce their stake in the SIP so now they are able to stand and watch what happens to China without too much worries as they’re no longer major players. 😛
@@conti-vl6txcontextual to Vietnam war
抄袭很学习是不一样的哦！
hahaha
Looks like SG hasn't learnt the lessons from this saga. Was the project a success in terms of collaboration with PRC? No amount of spinning can change the fact that SG got a raw deal.
Rubbish... Singapore leaders are from the cream of the crop...they don't need your advice !
BTO, very successful. 😂
how much money
we lost how many Billions or trillions?
How? You are an absolute eddiote
First time heard a country helping another country to build a city. A bit strange and weird to me. What is the agenda here?
win win why not?dumbass
My good chum it is the most elementary of motives; self interest. Singaporean companies own stakes in a lot of the properties and companies, which they got to set up under some beneficial policies such as discounted land, lower taxes, etc etc. Singapore benefits when those companies and properties generate value. Which essentially means that both are on the same line.
Mutual benefits and not a zero sum game.
Lee Kuan Yew stepped down from PM in 1990, then took on the role of developing a "second-wing" for Singapore. Think of it like expanding our geographical land, but overseas. Initial stake was 65% and China 35%. The local officials sabotaged the project and LKY complained openly all the way to Beijing. Then Singapore reduced its stake from 65% to 35% instead of pulling out entirely. Once China got back 65% all the "problems" were removed. Singapore learned a hard lesson at the government level of doing business with China.
@@solaris5655 Exactly! Honestly cannot trust the Chinese in terms of business collaboration, most will try and cut you out eventually. Been working and living in China for 15+ years, about 6 years in Suzhou, watching the SIP changing from an industrial/economics based concept to a residential heavy reality, a direct reflection of what the Chinese wants: Fast Money!!! Also seeing the SND area slowly grinding towards an eventual downfall, exacerbated by the terrible economic factors in China post-COVID and ongoing geopolitical & economic tensions. Somehow, knowing that SND will eventually fail kind of make me smile inside 😂 😂
History has taught us: @ahmetTekin101 and his cohorts are a stain on humanity.