WOW WOW WOW, man.....this sessions are insanely vigorizing. It just makes you want to dig it more and more. Keep it comming please. For the ones like me that don't have anyone to discuss this kind of stuff it's life saving. Thanks to all of you, each one of you looks so commited to share information that is so difficult to get FOR FREE that it blows my mind. Really thank you so much for the time you have give us!!!!!!!!! Greetings from Uruguay!
This is a treasure! So much bulshit is online these days. This is a real science, based on measurements. Not on assumptions from wrongly based calculators. You guys are going to change the industry.
Thank you John & Ron for sharing these findings and Karthik for hosting the discussion! The upcoming book you mention, is it the "“Recording Studios and Other Acoustic Spaces”"?
Rooms do not have a absorption coefficient. Surfaces do. If a anechoic chamber has a coefficient of 1 the surfaces reflect 0 back upon inertia. Direct sound will be heard because it hasn’t reached the absorptive surface.
At one point you guys talk about an absorption coefficient of a reflection free room. That you can't hear the sound coming out of a speaker when there is a 100% absorption. Well, rooms do not absorb. Surfaces absorb. So, in a room when there are non reflective walls you would still hear the direct sound.
@@markdelange980 I think that you missed the point. If you would like to understand more about what we've been discussing, please join my Facebook group - facebook.com/groups/517162262483268/
@@markdelange980 Seriously, you missed the point. 😅 Nowhere were we talking about a room or RFZ or anything like that. We were explaining how "some people," think that an absorption coefficient of 1 means 100% absorption. That is not true. It's a coefficient.
![BabyChiefDoit - Too Slow (feat. STAR BANDZ) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zayaxws7RPg/mqdefault.jpg)
WOW WOW WOW, man.....this sessions are insanely vigorizing. It just makes you want to dig it more and more. Keep it comming please. For the ones like me that don't have anyone to discuss this kind of stuff it's life saving. Thanks to all of you, each one of you looks so commited to share information that is so difficult to get FOR FREE that it blows my mind. Really thank you so much for the time you have give us!!!!!!!!! Greetings from Uruguay!
This was just absolutely amazing! Thank you Karthick, Marzban, Ron & John for doing this!
Keep these coming. Such great information.
This is a treasure! So much bulshit is online these days. This is a real science, based on measurements. Not on assumptions from wrongly based calculators. You guys are going to change the industry.
@@greganikin7003 we're working on it. Huge undertaking
Great!
Thank you John & Ron for sharing these findings and Karthik for hosting the discussion! The upcoming book you mention, is it the "“Recording Studios and Other Acoustic Spaces”"?
Yes.
Rooms do not have a absorption coefficient. Surfaces do. If a anechoic chamber has a coefficient of 1 the surfaces reflect 0 back upon inertia. Direct sound will be heard because it hasn’t reached the absorptive surface.
What ARE you talking about? 😂
And what you just said about a coefficient of 1 is utterly false. Watch more of our videos. 😎
At one point you guys talk about an absorption coefficient of a reflection free room. That you can't hear the sound coming out of a speaker when there is a 100% absorption. Well, rooms do not absorb. Surfaces absorb. So, in a room when there are non reflective walls you would still hear the direct sound.
@@markdelange980 I think that you missed the point. If you would like to understand more about what we've been discussing, please join my Facebook group - facebook.com/groups/517162262483268/
@@JHBrandt I didn't miss any point. What you stated was simply incorrect.
@@markdelange980 Seriously, you missed the point. 😅 Nowhere were we talking about a room or RFZ or anything like that. We were explaining how "some people," think that an absorption coefficient of 1 means 100% absorption. That is not true. It's a coefficient.