Wow. This fact right here is going to be evidence in the shure to come trial over AI training data. Using stock a stock photo site where none of the data is subject to royalties is one thing (as long as the fee was paid. And it being used as AI training data and letting a program scour every single image contained on the site must shurely warrant a different rate than a typical customer pulling stock images lol)...but using music, art, films, ect. that is copyright and involves royalty rights is completely another. I think it's obvious by the progress that all of human art was silently pilfered and high jacked in the creation of thier "product" and to be able to do what it does... and in order for it have the now truly viable value it now has (i.e. profits). I've recently heard some AI generated Udio songs that ate essentially rip offs of hit songs, word for word and nearly note for note. They have illegally used human art, that will be a large step towards making the artists who helped train it obsolete. AI is here...there needs to be regulations and disclosure laws ASAP. Everyone's should have a say I'm whether they want what they own to be used as training, and if it is used...they need to be compensated. As of now, we are actively helping and participating in the creation of thier "commercial product"... for free.
Scary what progress AI made in 2 years.
Like a bad LSD trip.
........................................i dun getit.
Now you need AI to remove 'Shutterstock' from the movie :) - but indeed, quite intersting..
Haha I wonder what they could have possibly trained it on! /s
Cool! Why Shutterstock on watermarks?
They must've used free stock photos to train the model
Wow. This fact right here is going to be evidence in the shure to come trial over AI training data. Using stock a stock photo site where none of the data is subject to royalties is one thing (as long as the fee was paid. And it being used as AI training data and letting a program scour every single image contained on the site must shurely warrant a different rate than a typical customer pulling stock images lol)...but using music, art, films, ect. that is copyright and involves royalty rights is completely another. I think it's obvious by the progress that all of human art was silently pilfered and high jacked in the creation of thier "product" and to be able to do what it does... and in order for it have the now truly viable value it now has (i.e. profits).
I've recently heard some AI generated Udio songs that ate essentially rip offs of hit songs, word for word and nearly note for note.
They have illegally used human art, that will be a large step towards making the artists who helped train it obsolete.
AI is here...there needs to be regulations and disclosure laws ASAP. Everyone's should have a say I'm whether they want what they own to be used as training, and if it is used...they need to be compensated. As of now, we are actively helping and participating in the creation of thier "commercial product"... for free.
That's spooky
Yeah it's some real weird stuff!
Isso vai valer milhões daqui a 10 anos.
beautiful history