Thank you sir for the video. it's great and helpful. But I can't find the paper you mentioned in 9:50. There's any link? Or can you write author's name?
This is the paper I referenced: Jean-Claude Monod. “Heaven on Earth? The Löwith-Blumenberg Debate.” Radical Secularization?: An Inquiry into the Religious Roots of Secular Culture 2 (2014). It appears as the first chapter in this collection: Radical Secularization? An Inquiry into the Religious Roots of Secular Culture Stijn Latré (Anthology Editor) , Walter Van Herck (Anthology Editor) , Guido Vanheeswijck (Anthology Editor) www.bloomsbury.com/us/radical-secularization-9781628921793/
I've thought about Karl Lowith for many years, but it's only in the past year, and especially in relation to the debate with Blumenberg, that I've been able to better appreciate what he was getting at.
Thank you for this outstanding summary of the lowith and Blumenberg debate. I fell into the topic by accident while studying Husserl's Krisis. It turns out that lowith provided a serious challenge to Husserl's claim that transcendental phenomenology can be a remedy to the rising in barbarism in the west.
11:30 Blumenberg's quote : I am not sure I understand Blumenberg's idea. It is that part where I am lost. I will read Blumenberg's and Vogel's ideas again, their books are hard to find in my postal code though!
Some time after this episode I posted an episode on Husserl: ruclips.net/video/T25e0L90VPY/видео.html Voegelin directly attacked Husserl’s philosophy of history, and Löwith’s argument can be applied to Husserl, though Husserl is not mentioned in Meaning in History. Although I have now done episodes on Husserl, Voegelin, and Löwith, I haven’t by any means gotten to the bottom of this, not least because, the more I dig, the more I find.
Thank you for the video! It really helped me studying for my exam!
I'm pleased to hear that you found it helpful.
Thank you sir for the video. it's great and helpful. But I can't find the paper you mentioned in 9:50. There's any link? Or can you write author's name?
This is the paper I referenced:
Jean-Claude Monod. “Heaven on Earth? The Löwith-Blumenberg Debate.” Radical Secularization?: An Inquiry into the Religious Roots of Secular Culture 2 (2014).
It appears as the first chapter in this collection:
Radical Secularization? An Inquiry into the Religious Roots of Secular Culture
Stijn Latré (Anthology Editor) , Walter Van Herck (Anthology Editor) , Guido Vanheeswijck (Anthology Editor)
www.bloomsbury.com/us/radical-secularization-9781628921793/
Don't transcendentalist the eminent.
Such an interesting assertion.
Very engaging episode.
I've thought about Karl Lowith for many years, but it's only in the past year, and especially in relation to the debate with Blumenberg, that I've been able to better appreciate what he was getting at.
Thank you for this outstanding summary of the lowith and Blumenberg debate. I fell into the topic by accident while studying Husserl's Krisis. It turns out that lowith provided a serious challenge to Husserl's claim that transcendental phenomenology can be a remedy to the rising in barbarism in the west.
11:30 Blumenberg's quote : I am not sure I understand Blumenberg's idea. It is that part where I am lost. I will read Blumenberg's and Vogel's ideas again, their books are hard to find in my postal code though!
Thank you again ! Great channel
Some time after this episode I posted an episode on Husserl: ruclips.net/video/T25e0L90VPY/видео.html
Voegelin directly attacked Husserl’s philosophy of history, and Löwith’s argument can be applied to Husserl, though Husserl is not mentioned in Meaning in History.
Although I have now done episodes on Husserl, Voegelin, and Löwith, I haven’t by any means gotten to the bottom of this, not least because, the more I dig, the more I find.