What about the men who do not want the baby? How do you then alleviate their financial responsibility? In any state if a woman filed dot child support the state will ensure they receive it. They will imprison them if it is not paid.
@@christophersmatla1932 I think most people are in shock at what your posting 😲,Are you saying if you have a biological child (your blood) but you don't want to be financial responsible for it ???? Is that what you are asking???? 😧
@@christophersmatla1932 You're so close to seeing the actual point. Here's a hint. I'm pro-choice, and I don't agree that men should be forced to take care of a child they never wanted to have either.
@@eliesh3833 I used to be pro-choice until I saw some videos of the baby trying to get away as it’s being chopped up. Gross I know and I don’t say this lightly. To me it is a question of what Murder is legal. If the state allows it and the parents are ok with it Then it is what it is. A doctor can make that decision if a woman’s life is in danger as well. The whole thing makes me sad.
Abortion is murder, and murder is illegal. It doesn’t matter if you were raped or involved in incest. You should not kill a baby for the sins of the father. The child should be the only thing good that comes out of it. If a mother should have a choice, whether she lives or the baby lives, and she chooses her life over the child’s life, that would be one of the greatest sins. Her life at that point is no longer valuable. Always choose a child’s life over situation.
@@vincentproud6589 You have both zero common sense,and ignorant at the same time. At some point you’ll realize you are better off, moving off grid away from society, and innocent people that should never be exposed to your stupidity, incompetence and influence!
It really is not. If I'm going to cause sadness or not be able to provide things to the baby, it's better to abort. I'm talking about early abortions when there is not even limbs or digits on the fetus. It doesn't have a consciousness to feel the hurt or even what that was. It isn't a grown fetus. Please stop this madness of pro life pro abortion. Keep abortion accessible. If someone wants to get one, they should be able to and if someone prefers not to then please don't.
People need to understand that forcing someone to go through something as hard as a pregnancy AND birth should be entirely up to the mother because its HER body that will suffer.
what you fail to understand is the majoirty of abortion cases are not becuase of rape or incest but because aborition is being used as a form of birthcontroll.
why do liberals beleive that 1 woman’s right is more important than ALL of a baby’s rights? it’s the baby’s body, not hers. women can get tattoos, implants, surgeries, they DO have rights to their bodies. saying they don’t have rights to their unborn child’s life (or rather death) isnt their body. so where does the “my body my choice” arguement have any logic or validity?
It really is not. If I'm going to cause sadness or not be able to provide things to the baby, it's better to abort. I'm talking about early abortions when there is not even limbs or digits on the fetus. It doesn't have a consciousness to feel the hurt or even what that was. It isn't a grown fetus. Please stop this madness of pro life pro abortion. Keep abortion accessible. If someone wants to get one, they should be able to and if someone prefers not to then please don't.
Bad reporting, the majority of Americans support access to abortion. Mississippi and Alabama are the minority, not the mainstream. And as far as options for restoration of abortion rights, your research was extremely lazy and incomplete.
So tell me, where is there ANY "right" to commit pre-meditated [first-degree] murder - or for that matter - steal my money to pay for it ? How do people imagine that they have any "right" to do this ? Spare me the special cricumstances such as rape, incest, or the life of the mother. I don't know of any one that does not make an exception in these cases. But to simply murder the baby because it is not wanted is beyond my imagination - just like everything else that Satan and the Democrat Party are trying to impose on humanity. Do I have any "right" or obligation to prevent the murder of unborn babies? Abortion is not a solution for to unwanted pregnacies. If there is any valid reason for makeing first-degree murder illegal, then there is also a valid reason to make this sort of abortion illegal as well.
? "....lost your legal right to an abortion ..." ? No one has ever had a "right" to commit pre-meditated first-degree murder. Who has told you there is any such "right" and why do you believe it? There is no government in the universe that has the "right" to make a law that says you may do this. "A premeditated intent to kill requires that the defendant had intent to kill and some willful deliberation (the defendant spent some time to reflect, deliberate, reason, or weigh their decision) to kill, rather than killing on a sudden impulse. Prior planning and deliberation are often closely intertwined. Courts focus on the “pre” in premeditation, and generally look for evidence that the defendant deliberated and subsequently formed the intent to kill prior to the act of killing. This is justified because the defendant must have thought about the murder for a period of time and did not change their mind. There are several factors indicating premeditation and deliberation. These include: lack of provocation from the victim, actions and words of the defendant before and after the killing, any threats from the defendant before and/or during the killing, whether the victim and the defendant had a poor history, whether there was an additional lethal attack after the victim was already helpless, evidence of brutality, and the nature and number of wounds." Can you define an Abortion for accurately than that ? No. Abortion is pre-meditated murder of a perfectly innocent baby. AND YOU KNOW IT! "The U.S. averaged 82k abortions monthly in 2022, 90k monthly in 2023, and is averaging around 99k monthly so far in 2024. The number of abortions performed in the U.S. continued to climb in 2024, increasing 11% in April to June this year, compared to the same period last year, according to a national report released Tuesday. Aug 7, 2024" Less than 1% of these pre-meditated murders were for the sake of rape, incest, or the life of the mother. I absolutely despise the Democrat for trying to "legalize" the outrageous murder of innocent babies. May God Almighty deal with you ever so severely for your affiliation with the Democrat Party and this cardinal sin against God and Humanity.
It is not ok to murder helpless humans. Talk,talk,talk, ..don't make murder of innocents ok. Exercise your reproductive RESPONSIBILITIES!!! NOT MURDER.
Not a right to murder babies. Not a right that at 21 weeks mothers and their infants go in to have the babies limbs torn off. Explained by ex abortionists they drain the sack and then grab whatever they can and literally pull off whatever limb their forceps can grab. Not cut. Yank.off. They arent cells. They arent clumls.of flesh. Do you want to know the depth of the weeping of the mothers who found out that 21 weeks is long enough for the baby to live outside the womb? Yes live. As in in before that they were indeed alive inside the womb. Or of the abortion clinic/satanis temple in new Mexico called samuel alitos moms satanic temple, where they take the still alive babies from the mother to the other room? Where the mlthers often have no.idea their babies are screaming but just unable to make a sound yet while you all argue about them just being clumps of cells?
It will eventually. It'll happen all over the world. It's inevitable, you can't stop progress. The availability of birth control has made abortion unnecessary. Civilized people now consider it to be an archaic, barbaric, medieval form of birth control and see no reason to allow it. Banning it is no different than banning slavery. Those who still defend it are on the wrong side of history.
It hinges on the response at the polls. If the party in power is delivered a defeat then in the following election the pro-life politicians will skirt the issue knowing that to bring this issue up again would mean another defeat at the polls.
Not necessarily anything's possible if these cold harded narcissistic conservatives can put in all of the work in order to eliminate a woman's right to whatever she wants to do with her body. Thereby shutting down almost half of these planned parenthood clinics in what I refer to this country and continent DSA which stands for the decided states of America sense this fallen country ours. Is refusing to get itself from off of the ground and start standing on it and what I mean by that is the citizens in this country need to learn how to criticize a person in a positive way and not a negative or there'll continue to be insulting words coming out of peoples mouth's until the first day of Armageddon. And that's something that I refuse to see or be apart of until then this country doesn't deserve to called the United States of America. Because this country isn't even trying to make an effort in uniting mainly because there's such deep dark history throughout this country and continent so for those that true citizens and patriots of the country no not to keep saying that we in the greatest in the world when none these are true. It's because half white America's refusing to own up to the fact that this land that half of America keeps saying the ignorant words this country and land when. Deep down inside half America has no problem saying that this isn't our land meanwhile the other half of America has chasen to remain arrogant and cold harded instead of being loving and warm welcoming.
I agree this is what things typically hinge on; however, like most on the left (not saying you are) you are missing something. The ruling against Roe V Wade and abortion was not the result of republican politicians or even their influence. Despite what you hear from them; this was purely a legal decision. I understand if most offices were held by democrats, abortion could be made law, but to attempt to hold republican politicians responsible for the reversal in Roe v Wade is just ridiculous and short sightedness.
Fortunately, the re-criminalisation of abortion in Canada through legislative and/or judicial means will not see the light of day. Evidently, abortion has long remained a 'proverbial' third-rail of Canadian politics.
Abortion is not about the Woman’s body so much as it is about the *pre-meditated murder* of perfectly innocent babies. No one has any "right" to commit this heinous crime. Who has told you that this is a “right” or that you can make other people pay for abortions if it is declared by the Democrat that you have a “legal right” to murder your baby? This is absurd and totally evil. Is there no evil thing the Democrat does not support and facilitate?
"...gets it's abortion rights back" ??? What "right" do you imagine exists for pre-meditated [first-degree] murder of a perfectly inocent baby? Who has told you this is your "right" - and why do you want to believe it? Why do you think any sort of Satanicly inspired, man-made Govenment law can make this OK? "Reproductive Rights" ? This is an absurd phrase. The topic is not about your "right" to reporduce/pro-create! It's about the pre-meditated murder of inocent babies -- and-- trying to make it "legal" so the govenment can steal my money to pay it. *"First-degree murder is the most severe form of murder defined in the US legal system. In these cases, the crime is committed with the intent to cause harm to and kill the victim or victims with no regard for human life."*
Both sides need to come to the aid of a fetus' rights, as the mother can defend & has rights for herself. If not, the USA will become a UNBORN baby's # 1's worst national killer on the planet.
@@SlyFan-mp8dcso you're super informed with every justice system, politics, laws of every country in the world? Good for you👍. PASS the law🤷♂️? I dont care who does it...that wasnt my point!
They better do something because they’ve made inbreeding legal in the United States of America , One blood family member making another blood family member pregnant that’s called in breeding, and they are forced to have the baby oh my goodness, One never knows what will happen,
That is absolute rubbish. No one is being forced to have any baby. If yorkshire in uk decided abortion is illegal, and you lived in Bradford, what would you do? You'd go to derbyshire, or notts or lancs to get it done. They aren't tying women to beds for 9 months don't be so ridiculous. Each state makes its own law, just like each country in eu does so. The eu court has not issued any ruling on abortion, and us Supreme Court just did exactly the same thing. They said, its not up to us to decide. So the states each decide. They do so for THEIR population, based on what the voters want. If a citizen doesn't like it, they can freely move to another state. There are no boundaries. Also rape and incest victims DO have a legal right to abortion. Tell me, do you agree with California who HAVE legalized abortion at 9 months? A doctor either delivers the baby and just leaves it to die of starvation and exposure or injects it in the womb to stop its heart before aborting it. That sound right to you? Or does it sound like murder? Who needs 9 months to decide they don't want a baby? That's what this is all about. The 2 extremes. Those who want a total ban, and those who want to legalise murder. And the Supreme Court washed their hands of it and said YOU decide. It is not a constitutional right... that is all they ruled on. The Supreme Court are guardians of the constitution and ONLY rule on and hear cases regarding constitutional matters. If congress wants to make it law, they can. But they won't, because they know they will lose far too many voters. So they tried to dump this on the Supreme Court so they could blame them. And trump for some unknown reason since he has nothing whatsoever to do with this. The Supreme Court decide they weren't going to do the dirty work for spineless politicians. And now it's being used to try and paint the republican party as the devil. Which is simply not true. The president, btw, whoever it is, CANNOT make this decision, any more than king Charles can do so in uk. The president is like the monarch, with politics included. That what you want?😊
Not a right to murder babies. Not a right that at 21 weeks mothers and their infants go in to have the babies limbs torn off. Explained by ex abortionists they drain the sack and then grab whatever they can and literally pull off whatever limb their forceps can grab. Not cut. Yank.off. They arent cells. They arent clumls.of flesh. Do you want to know the depth of the weeping of the mothers who found out that 21 weeks is long enough for the baby to live outside the womb? Yes live. As in before that, they were indeed alive inside the womb. Or of the abortion clinic/satanis temple in new Mexico called samuel alitos moms satanic temple, where they take the still alive babies from the mother to the other room? Where the mothers often have no idea their babies are screaming but just unable to make a sound yet while you all argue about them just being clumps of cells?
"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe
This makes no sense at all. It is clearly the exact opposite of what you say. The unborn are easy to forget about. Born children are the ones who cause the burden - that is why you want to avoid them being born, right?
For all the uninformed Brit’s out there unable to mind there own country’s business- the Supreme Court did not outlaw abortion anywhere. All it said was that the constitution is neutral on the issue and therefore it’s left to the democratic process just like in every other developed country. Any restrictions are not from the court, but from democratic majorities. By the way, roe was extremely radical in allowing elective abortions for 24 weeks. Most countries’ abortion laws, including the UK, France, Denmark, and virtually all of Europe apart from the Netherlands, would be struck down under roe.
I also don't understand the logic behind expanding the court. What happens when Republicans have the house, senate and also the White House? They would want to expand to make sure they get the supreme court verdicts in their favor. Is it supposed to go on and on? Peope are so short sighted, they don't realise that if it wasn't for Harry Reid to change the rules in order to appoint Federal Judges Trump probably wouldn't have been able to appoint three Supreme Court judges.
@@willwell4450 unfortunately leftists operate on emotion instead of reason. So yes if democrats expand the court then republican voters would demand the same when they’re back in power and we’d end up with a court bigger than congress
I think the rest of the world might legitimately consider not minding America's business, when America starts minding its own business. Hmm? As well as there being general greater awareness of the US, as the worlds cultural hegemony, than other places and empathy for those effected by the defacto loss of rights (whatever the institutional or legislative route), there is also the worry that when US conservatives sneeze, British ones catch a cold.
We need for the Democrats to control Congress. If we had that, we could pass a bill protecting women’s right to abortions in perpetuity. If we DON’T control Congress, that bill will be impossible. THEREFORE, VOTE DEMOCRATIC IN NOVEMBER!
If women in certain states are forced to carry a fetus, maybe men should be required to get vasectomies. Since the right to abortion is taken away in many states from women, men should have the same happen to them with vasectomies. What is apparently good for the goose is should be good for the gander. It takes two to create a pregnancy.
@@historyrepeated4239 One issue is equality between men and women. I am a male but believe that men ,many times, have no idea what they are doing. Men do not have wombs thus should have zero say in the topic of abortion. Men should shut their mouths on this issue.
@@Toto-cl8rw Men should be hunted down and be held accountable for every life they create. No exceptions. The value of an unborn life should not be determined by the means of how it’s brought into the world. They cannot control that their mother hosts the womb. It’s ironic how you opine on who should speak or not speak, despite your mother giving you the right to life. The fact that you’re alive, negates your stance on who gets to live or die doesn’t it? You’d be advocating for your own destruction.
@@historyrepeated4239 what I am saying is that the sperm initiates the growth of the fetus. Most abortions are performed within the parameters of Roe V/S Wade. Roe V/S Wade was compromise, and the world cannot exist without compromise, and give a take. At least it was a fair decision on both sides. Now that is gone, and an unfair result, against strong public opinion favouring abortion. The government should not be allowed to decide on what a women decides. If my mother had decided to abort me at birth I would still on her side. It was her prerogative and right to decide. Circumstances were favourable when it came to my birth. The time was right, the family could afford me,etc. I do not think life would be the same for me if I was forced to be born and then rejected or put up for adoption. To me that is more cruel than abortion.
US States are still free to legalize abortion. I think this is the point of the originalists. Rather than having nine US Supreme Court justices force states to legalize abortion by "discovering" that the constitution guarantees the right, it is really a legislative matter that should be decided democratically. I must say, however, that the variety of state laws on this matter will give rise to bewildering legal complexity.
what’s wrong with america right now? In the 1960s, the ‘falling rate of profit’ caused the value of labor to fall so low that unions started forming, there was much pressure on the private sector to fix the labor issues by the media, and the government, in other countries they just started investing more in labor, but in America, a guy named Lewis Powell, a corporate lawyer talked the republicans and chamber of commerce into having the corporations just pay off the media, government, and politicians. This is all in the ‘Powell memo,’ and not but a few years later they got caught in the act during the watergate controversy, soon, almost all American manufacturing moved overseas to cheap labor colonies and Ronald and Nancy Reagan answered to the corporations by shining a light on abortion as a Republican voting issue and they shed a light on people who had actually no power whatsoever, black welfare queens who were not hired by small businesses and were abandoned In inner cities by both the growth from white generational wealth leaving in white flight and the manufacturers who hired them leaving the country. They married these issues to pro corporate legislation that a working class voter would never vote for. They claimed to be conservative but their economic policies multiplied the amount of feminists and housewives and mothers in the workforce from 60s and 70s and that caused crime to go up because no parents were home. Dark money was so successful that the private sector became the government and the democrats, a historically working class party that can never actually pass anti working class legislation soon joined that dark money and they are now a controlled opposition of the donor class, the same donors that own the republicans own the democrats, they are paid to introduce and block working class bills when they are in power, Democratic politicians want to be seen As incompetent against the republicans but they are laughing all the way to the bank every time someone like cenk calls them incompetent, they are not incompetent at destroying the progressive agenda for instance. Right now fox is telling its viewers there’s too many workers in the market and that’s because they are paid by the corporations to cushion the fall of a mass layoff so elite class can lower interest rates and invest again. If america was a production economy like before 70s when they gave all the jobs to China and Mexico instead of a ‘financialization’ / gambling economy, the elite class would still be making profits producing goods but all they do is gamble now. For thirty years the conservatives have had a majority in Supreme Court and tons of cases over abortion that could’ve overturned roe, why didn’t they? why now? Because Georgia and Arizona went blue, I’ve been keeping an eye on this for a long time, republicans gerrymander and throw out voting rights to cheat elections in these red states that their donors would never step foot and refer to as ‘fly over country’ but people keep moving into those states because cheap rent and property. Them axing roe actually isn’t enough to get people to stop moving there because abortion clinics weren’t available in most of these states before roe was even overturned, that’s why we’re going to see contraceptives become outlawed. if you follow the money you will find a donor class desperate to keep republican states Republican so they can continue paying gop politicians to pass corporate bills instead of paying dem politicians to sit on their hands.
@@DrGingerHamster lol, do you disagree with the main narrative of my poorly written on iPhone response? didn’t mean to make it sound like unions didn’t exist before 1970s
Imagine, anyone but the unborn themselves, deciding what the value of their life is. This is not a power struggle between women's rights (unless the woman is in the womb) and the reach of the federal gov't. It is a matter of who speaks for the value of the unborn life. Of course, nobody is qualified to determined the value of an unborn life. It's too bad there are too many derelict fathers out there that put too many women in this position. That's half the problem. The other half is looking at abortion being a solution to solve a problem.......at the cost of an unborn life.
Judges that are Christian should have to recuse themselves because of a conflict of interest with separating church and state. Abortion and contraception is a christian belief banned by the Pope.
The religious arguement of life begins at conception is actually a perfectly easy case to make secularly as well. A human fetus is a stage of human life that's scientifically irrefutable.
@Baxter An atheist shouldn’t remove women’s rights EITHER….. Abortion isn’t a religious issue, it’s a Liberty issue…… either a woman can get one or she can’t……
No, please don’t say that!….. The majority of Christians are pro-choice…. the majority of pro-choicers are Christians….. Most Christians are reasonable people who can see the difference between holding a private belief and executing public policy…… It’s just extreme rightwing fundies who have trouble with the concept…..
Cry blood. Abortions have won every time its on the ballots. My state overturned abortions last year and I am glad because no child deserves a world like this. Having a child is the most selfish thing anyone can ever do. You only want the unborn babies born so they can suffer. Your movement of pro life is sadistic. I call them pro sadists because they want children born so they can suffer.
@@ageis3250 The United States is not a theocracy. Given the zealotry of abortion opponents that abortion violates God’s Word, it might come as a surprise that neither the Old Testament nor the New mentions abortion-not one word. In fact there may be evidence to suggest The Book Of Numbers might even encourage it: 21-27.
@Paraphrase1-Z9 Not a right to murder babies. Not a right that at 21 weeks mothers and their infants go in to have the babies limbs torn off. Explained by ex abortionists they drain the sack and then grab whatever they can and literally pull off whatever limb their forceps can grab. Not cut. Yank.off. They arent cells. They arent clumls.of flesh. Do you want to know the depth of the weeping of the mothers who found out that 21 weeks is long enough for the baby to live outside the womb? Yes live. As in before that, they were indeed alive inside the womb. Or of the abortion clinic/satanis temple in new Mexico called samuel alitos moms satanic temple, where they take the still alive babies from the mother to the other room? Where the mothers often have no idea their babies are screaming but just unable to make a sound yet while you all argue about them just being clumps of cells?
Saw a yt short that said that if the mother dies during forced childbirth they should also then kill the father. Because if they're going to force one parent to endanger their own life, then it should be equal. Honestly, it kinda seems fair to me 🤷
So if the human fetus is killed intentionally, does that mean the mother, father, "doctor" and state governor should all be killed too? Seems very silly to me!
To hear Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana lament about infant mortality rates in his state and blame the fact that people of color are the reason these rates are so high is shocking. Maybe he’d prefer people Of color be treated as 3/5th of a human being. And this guy is a doctor.
Planned Parenthood convinces the ignorant that they should have an abortion..intellectuals need no convincing it is their "right" to kill their baby which they consider as a "parasite"...
What are the rights of the father of the child 🤔 What are the rights of he child to be aborted ? Does the mother have 100 % rights of the child nut when born the fathwr must pay money 💲💶💵💳💷 ? How does that work. The ferus created from two origins Father and mother !! Its not the mother's body here being violated. Its the body of the Fetus !! Anyone ever think ?
It is now up to the individual states, rather than liberals sat in cities hundreds/thousands of miles away. If the majority of people want something, it gets voted in and vice versa. This is better than painting all the states with the same brush and expecting everyone to be happy about it. Roe v Wade being cancelled was the right thing to do.
@@friccinfrosty4677 That's already happening. Some progressive cities have vowed to not 'enforce the law' in that state. It's going to be interesting to see how this all shakes out.
That divides society. The matter is Roe V. Wade, not how it affects the politics of republicans or conservatives. A fetus is not a baby, nor is an embryo a baby. The cherry picking republicans are real. The stage where people get an abortion is usually the stage where they bear an embryo or fetus within their womb. They are the precondition to humans, but they are not babies. Philosophically or otherwise. There are still liberals in every city advocating for the right stuff. Abortion should be a centralized human right; the consideration to keep yapping on about fetuses (which are not babies, they are literally not) instead of people who are actually alive and in need of help is the most disgusting cherry-picked action republicans have done so far. RVW was not cancelled. The democrats are acting quickly now. A democrat city in contrast within a republican state will mean the republicans have a stranglehold on the road areas to that city through law, and so on and so forth. That not only divides communities further, but it gives rise to more sinister neo-nazis, fascists, and conservatards. RVW will get codified. The Liberals are lobbying everywhere, it's not just in states where evil conservatives cuck their way into the law so they could feel, even if for a little while, that the World revolves around them.
This isn't a "reproductive rights" issue. It's a "cull my unborn child" issue. It isn't a human rights issue, it's a human wants issue. That fetus is totally human. Yes it's small, dependant, in the uterus and not fully developed but do these circumstances dictate that it has no rights? I'm 58 yrs old, 6'6" tall, 245 lbs. Do I automatically have more human rights than a new born? I'm bigger, much less dependant, much more developed and not in utero. Certainly I don't have more human rights than my very young relatives and friends. Answer this please! Why is no one talking about the reproductive rights of unborn human women?
There are six things the Lord hates, seven that are detestable to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
i’m in the uk so fortunately we are not going through this delicate subject i believe that we have enough forms of pregnancy prevention but they are not 💯 guaranteed i believe that women have the right to choose to end their pregnancies under a time limit ( i feel that 20 weeks in the uk is too high and should be like 12) also some women are not fit to be a parent and women who are victims of rape should not have to go through the pregnancy if they choose i’m sorry but if a woman is made to have a child against her will there could be a whole heap of problems down the road
They count from the first day of the last period not from fertilization. Some have longer cycles than others so its not easy to set a low limit cause then some are over it even before haveing a chance to know they are pregnant
But that is NOT what is happening in usa. I dont believe a single state has decided that abortion is illegal for rape victims. In vast majority of cases they have a limit of around 16 weeks. So please don't believe this alarmist garbage spewed by ch4. I'm british I live in Michigan. It really is no big deal to anyone apart from the nutters on the left and the crazies in California who have legalized abortion up to and including birth.
@@isaacvazquez627 How are women free when our choices about our bodies are disregarded and taken away from us? They aren't pro life they're pro forced birth and its ridiculous.
Accurate reporting/researching aside, don't you find it outrageous that we'll abolish the death penalty for convicted murderers--that is we MERCIFULLY let them LIVE--BUT we allow innocent not yet born babies/foetus to be KILLED UNMERCIFULLY!
It's hard to make legislative changes when you don't have the votes. For all the talk about the supposed support of abortion, the truth is people support it being RESTRICTED but legal in the first trimester. The Dems or almost any state could pass that.
It really is not. If I'm going to cause sadness or not be able to provide things to the baby, it's better to abort. I'm talking about early abortions when there is not even limbs or digits on the fetus. It doesn't have a consciousness to feel the hurt or even what that was. It isn't a grown fetus. Please stop this madness of pro life pro abortion. Keep abortion accessible. If someone wants to get one, they should be able to and if someone prefers not to then please don't.
How could you not mention the ability to pass a new amendment of the constitution making abortion a constitutional right, this is the only permanent solution and you didn’t even mention it? Yes the likelihood is near impossible but seems like a pretty major point to miss out. You also didn’t mention the dangerous precedent allowing numbers of justices to be expanded sets, it virtually defeats the point of having a judiciary and makes it completely politicised even more than it is today
Eventually they will be talking about expanding congress/the senate/the presidency if an election doesn't go their way. But not until they lower the voting age to 16 to lock in even more brain dead votes.
Don't you get it? The "Government" has no say whatsoever to "legalize" pre-meditated [first-degree] murder. Make all the "laws" you want. It's still a horrible crime to murder innocent babies - no matter how you label it. "Reproductive Rights" ? That's phrase has nothing to do with any imaginary "right" to commit murder. Your "right" to reproduce/pro-create has nothing to do with a fictitious "right" to commit murder. Educate me - the 9th amendment is in regard to rights not specifically listed in the Bill of Rights. It cannot be applicable to something that is not- and never has been, and never can be a "right". Where you people imagine their right to murder innocent babies is established?
If I'm on a diet and I see someone eating a cookie, I should not tell them that they aren't allowed to eat their cookie because I'm the one on a diet. If im a vegan and I see someone eating steak, I should not tell them that they aren't allowed to eat steak because I'm a vegan, because it doesn't affect them, my lifestyle is not their lifestyle and maybe they can't go on a diet because of health issues. I am not the person who should decide what they can and cannot eat, only they can. Just like how someone who believes abortions are wrong should not dictate whether I should or shouldn't have an abortion, because it's my life, not theirs. And if they're a stranger they have no right to tell me what I can't do with my body because I can't tell them what to do with theirs. It doesn't affect them, only me. if you're against abortions and don't want them then you don't need to have one, but it's important to have that option for the person who might need it. Romania illegalized abortions back in the 1980s I believe and it didn't help them at all, there were babies on the street dying because they were forced to be there. It didn't save children, it made children suffer alone because they weren't wanted, and the women died trying to get rid of them
Except, that nobody agrees with you On need the side of the argument There is no question that pregnancy will turn into a viable human being. Your argument, is that it’s yours, to decide whatever you want to do it. Does that include up till an hour before birth? The other argument is that it’s a woman’s right for what is a medical procedure; which falls right into the category of state control. It’s ridiculously complex situation.
@@Ont785 Yea if it's mine and it's gonna affect my life, it is my choice and my choice alone. And if giving birth to it will kill me then I don't see why I shouldn't have the option to abort.
@@Ont785 I believe restrictions on time is fine, I'd probably cut it off after the first 2/3 weeks after the third trimester has started. A six month year old baby can process pain, is breathing, heart is beating, thinking, etc. It's not just a clump of cells anymore. A fetus is just a clump of cells, it can't feel pain, it doesn't have a heartbeat during when most abortions take place and it's not breathing
@@StrawberryLaces2012 Well not exactly, the question of who or what we bestow rights to is a societal one, (and yes historically unborn children had the rights of life and inheritance).. when its reduced you're argument is basically that because its still growing its ok to kill it.. which isn't very convincing..
Well Roe v Wade was hanging on the right to privacy...I'm not a lawyer, but I'm in good company when I say that's a stretch, and sidesteps the entire argument about when a fetus has a right to life. The justices who voted against the overturn didn't argue it was constitutional, they argued it's a slippery slope because other rights are protected on similarly shaky ground
Im not american... But can u explain what kind of constitution that the SCOTUS breaks? I thought,after Roe V Wade being overturned,The Federal States are no longer in position to intervene abortion. But instead it's given to The Individual States,The 10th Amendment of The Constitution says : "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Hence,the decision are given back to The Individual States,how does The SCOTUS being "unconstitutional"? The Overturn of Roe V Wade does not prohibited abortion,but it is The Individual States who will Correct me if i'm wrong
How on earth does any one equate the 14th amendment with the imagineary "right" to Abortion/pre-meditated murder? Transcript AMENDMENT XIV Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the *male inhabitants* of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such *male citizens* shall bear to the whole number of *male citizens* twenty-one years of age in such State. Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Where do you find anyting whatsoever related to the imaginary Womans Right to an Abortion? With or without any sort of Originanist interpratation ? It's simeply not there. Never has been, and there is no "right" to commit pre-meditated murder. And what is pre-meditated murder ? Murder in the first-degree. " Prior planning and deliberation are often closely intertwined. Courts focus on the “pre” in premeditation, and generally look for evidence that the defendant deliberated and subsequently formed the intent to kill prior to the act of killing. This is justified because the defendant must have thought about the murder for a period of time and did not change their mind. There are several factors indicating premeditation and deliberation. These include: lack of provocation from the victim, actions and words of the defendant before and after the killing, any threats from the defendant before and/or during the killing, whether the victim and the defendant had a poor history, whether there was an additional lethal attack after the victim was already helpless, evidence of brutality, and the nature and number of wounds. However, many jurisdictions concede that there is no bright, arbitrary line when premeditation begins and ends." This is what Abortion is. It's absurd to even emaine that this is in anyway related to he 14th amendment.
50 million. That is the number of abortions since 1973 that were elective procedures, not needed for medical or legal reasons, but purely for ridding the inconvenience of having a child. That is a low estimate out of the 65 million total. That is a bigger population than any US state, and closer to making two state populations. And abortion is still alive and well, you can still have an Abortion up to 9 months in New York, other states have cut it down to not include people using abortion as contraception. More than 20% have had at least two abortions, and 8% have had over three. The Supreme court simply moved the matter back to the states, just like cannabis and legal gambling. In which everyone was happy about.
-That is the number of abortions since 1973 that were elective procedures: So? I'm not really sure how forcing women to have babies that they couldn't care for is a good thing... -You can still have an abortion up to 9 months in New York: Most women seeking an abortion in anti-choice states cannot afford to travel. Those women also face legal liability for such traveling, including if the procedure is meant to save their lives -The Supreme court simply moved the matter back to the states, just like cannabis and legal gambling: SCOTUS has never decided on the legality of cannabis. Nor has it decided a case regarding gambling in state law - Only in the Federal context. This was a removal of a right that women had. And no, everyone is not happy about this.
@@TheLegendOfRandy "Once you're out you're own your own" is a sentiment I've seen many give, which goes to show they care more for a fetus than a born child and mother combined.
Incredible right? Let me kill my unborn baby but you better wear this thing on your face or you can't see your child cheerleading or playing ball. Makes me sick.
Golly Gee whiz Wally… if being forced to wear a mask is outrageous….. imagine being forced to give birth against your will!…. That’s a lot worse in case you didn’t know…..
Calling the president of one country, "the most powerful man in the world", is a huge stretch, and very rude and misleading to other countries. Yes, the US has a lot of influence on other countries, but we are equal to other countries in many ways, superior in may ways and inferior in many ways. Its also important to remember check and balances, which keep the president in check. That statement is just neglectfully a hyperbole.
I'm a Christian, and one of God's commandments says "Thou Shall not murder." So I am so thankful that more babies are being saved! P.S. Trash me all you want, I fear God more than anybody else
hopefully this message will inspire persuade encourage motivate females to take back their divinity from males. 8 billion of USoAs are 100% equal bags of our mothers skin filled with our grandmothers muscles! we all live on planet Earth within blue planet. humans, people are bags of nutrients, sustenance, food, fruits, vegetables, grains, and mothers meats. all humans grew in our mothers uterus and are 100% bags of our mothers! The only 3 differences; scoop earth, soul, and history. The true pure all-natural cures for pregnancy, infectious parasitic Sexually-Transmitted Disease Venereal Disease is already built-in working perfectly miraculously effortlessly and will never fail your mom, thank Mother Nature a.k.a. GOD! Fatal only to Females preeclampsia eclampsia sudden-death of pregnancy must be prevented proactively requires a daily sweat equity 3×3:1 be your own medical doctor primary care provider with a complete recipe Grandmotherly-TLC-123. There are 3 GOD built into 1, Your mother, Our grandmothers, and Mother Earth. 1. Your Mother gave you birth, so your mother is GOD. 2. Your Grandmother gave your Mother Earth, so your Grandmother is GOD. 3 - Our grandmother was given birth by Mother Earth Blue Planet, so GOD.
65-year-old black male have always cautious of White males but not fear of White males and no fear of God because I know with absolute certainty males killing females wholesale don't go to jail it certainly white males groomed to become serial killers not go to jail back to the death penalty whereas black males get shot in the back of White males and they get memorials promotions statues streets named after them for being baby killers.
Congress are the ones to decide whether or not abortion is ok, and they need to pass such laws. The Supreme Court only interprets the law. The constitution needs a new amendment that protects abortion of an embryo, but you need to tell that to congress. Shitting on the court does not make a lot of sense imo
What are the actual rules of abortion? Upto how many weeks? These are the rules that should be set straight if ever Abortion becomes legal. And it should be under very valid reasons. Not just because they simply wanted to or didn’t want to. Pregnancy due to rape/incest or medical reasons that can endanger the mother’s life should be the only reasons and nothing else. And should only be done when the embryo is not yet formed at all.
@Martin ah I see. Perhaps one of the anti ppl from 2005-2015. Nah not a yes man fits the parallel speech patterns of the anti ppl but I don't see you as fully hooked. Good for you. Why say no when it feels so good to say yes and change your mind later?
@Martin you're awesome bro!! Go on you way thinking thats the case. Oh you will fail now and again but so what....still awesome.....still a chance to achieve that which is beyond awesomeness.... the ever elusive funk.. you get there i know it!! Go martin...yess sir!!
@Martin cool strawman bud. Truth is USA isn't failing any more or less than we've ever been and certainly no more than any other country. Trouble at home does an Armageddon make know what I'm saying? Of course we have problems, it's not like it's a big revelation, but I have very little interest in hearing about it from foreigners because the fact is they are biased like everyone else; they're just biased in a way that comes from THEIR society not mine.
Abortian is concerning to me, if there’s a place in the country where it’s legal to have a medical procedure and you live in a state where it’s not legal that your state can decide what you can and can’t do with your body, which is essentially based on a religious idea,”
Yeah, so a fetus can sense, so what?? Oh and don't forget, now a days even a person born a male can become pregnant so I guess it's also "your father's womb"? 😂😂😂
Everyone in this country has the right of bodily autonomy. It’s why you can’t force someone to give blood, or donate an organ. This right is still in effect after you die, and is the reason why the government can’t just come in and take all your organs after you pass on. Now, having said that, if you say a woman can’t have an abortion you are doing two things; you’re giving the embryo rights then any person already born, and you’re giving a woman less rights to her body then a corpse
actually 8 billion humans 1 DNA 1 genus 1 species 1 family ... Began procreating by male dominance hate rape incest million years ago ... have the exact same bag of skin filled with our mothers muscles going back to before the dinosaurs beginning of blue planet, when our greatest grandmother's was 4 footed running circles around T Rex.
You might've mentioned some very useful information: Progressive Democrats are necessary to protect such rights. Other Democrats are for sale to the highest bidder, or they are Democrat In Name Only. Run and vote Progressive.
‘Huge step’ as abortion access changes Tue, 11 July 2023 at 8:12 am AEST Undated : RU486 abortion pill - medical drugs tablets RU-486 All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it in a major change to abortion rules in Australia. All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it as new rules are brought in. Until now, prescribers and dispensers of the two-part medical abortion treatment needed extra certification or registration, meaning only about 10 per cent of doctors and 30 per cent of pharmacists are currently able to deal with the pill. But from August 1, restrictions around the MS-2 Step will be removed, in a move the government says will “improve equitable access to healthcare for all Australians”. Nurse practitioners - who represent about one per cent of nurses - will also be able to prescribe the medications under the PBS.
You have all your rights, that's between you and freedom. Sometimes there is a third party infringing on those rights, those rights don't go away, they're just repressed. Tyranny only gets as powerful as we allow it to get.
Right to have an abortion is not a positive right, it does not mean forcing someone to provide you an abortion then that would be a positive right, they are talking about the right to be allowed to have an abortion. Meaning the individual pays for it and the person providing the service is doing it voluntarily. No one’s individual rights are being violated in these circumstances. The only individual right being violated is the right to your own life and ability to do what you choose with your body which is being denied by state governments
Uh, yes, actually, they do. Their bodies, their rules. Period. End of story. And you aren’t going to stop abortions. In fact, I’ve got contacts to get girls and women to safe clinics through my employment, and I intend to do just that for anyone who needs one.
@@jacobmacdonagh4070 I hope your daughter gets pregnant at 13. Then you can watch her ruin her life with the baby she isn’t mature enough to handle because you wouldn’t let her abort
@@emmawieson2121 Did you read my comment? I’m pro choice, I’m saying abortion is a right. I was making the point that abortion is a negative right and not a positive right like the original comment was saying
ahh yes, the illiterate internet hobo who doesn't know anything about democracy but loves to complain about how any kind of political conflict in the country is antidemocratic. Tell us more about this democracy that you speak of.....
@@elcristoph7380 You mean the same states with gerry-mandered districts, where candidates can promise abortion laws that mean women who have miscarriages now have legal liability?
Should never be a political issue. Once it is, it becomes a problem that can never be solved. Too many variables. It’s not the governments job to solve personal problems. It’s not the governments job to pay for the cost of personal problems. Percentage wise it affects a small percentage of women. Probably 5-10 percent. Heath wise you can’t ban abortion and legally you can’t force the population to pay for it. At best ,the government should insure that all health facilities meet the strictest standards and then stay out of it. The Constitution doesn’t guarantee abortions!
Democracy rarely suits everyone. And as abortion isn't a constitutional matter it is a legislative matter, either at the state level or the federal level. Packing the Supreme Court would also have a negative fall out. There are several solutions to the matter on an individual level and a legal level. Attacking the Supreme Court for just doing their job is pretty daft though.
@@joebidenisyourpresidentget2481 Abortion is not protected under the US Constitution. Denying reality may be the fashion for some at the moment, however it's not a productive choice.
@@URBeingLiedTo The right to do what you want with your own body is protected. The government cannot force you to get a surgery nor can they deny you from getting a surgery. The same kind of freedom applies to abortion.
@@joebidenisyourpresidentget2481 Some people don't agree that abortion is a right as they feel it is killing an unborn life. So as it's not protected under the constitution, it has been returned to the state legislatures. So it's up to them to work through this issue or for the Federal Government to put laws in place. But feel free to think what you want to think 👍
@REEEEEEE . Scientifically speaking, a new human life begins at the moment of fertilization where a completely new DNA is created that has never existed before and will never exist again. The sperm itself is not considered a distinct human life according to science. When it comes to adoption, there is more demand than offer when it comes to the adoption of newborns.
Sadly we're dealing with a bunch of bloodthirsty lunatics who just want to murder innocent lives because the majority don't want to take responsibility for what they chose to create.
I trust that every single person who subscribes to the 'sanctity of life' philosophy in their opposition to abortion is also opposed the death penalty. The odd thing is that there is an anomalous correspondence between states now reverting to abortion bans and the continued use of capital punishment.
@REEEEEEE . no sir. A sperm is a chromosome male or female. At conception when a sperm and an egg meet, a distinct being with its own DNA and with its own identy has come into formation
@REEEEEEE . the rest of your argument is abhorrent. We do not kill to better society. African nations, which are statistically impovershed, do no kill there starving villages to make the general populace better off. Even though that would work it is a eugenics argument.
The reason pro lifers are against abortion is that they believe that the unborn child is alive, and that there is no such thing as a right to murder another human being. The reason that pro choicers don't agree is that they were told not to by their betters. That's really all that the debate comes down to.
@@TyrianHaze lol you blob of cells….. Covid was a public health emergency…. Abortion is a private medical decision….. You can’t catch pregnancy passing somebody in the store aisle…..
@@TyrianHaze Rightwads: You can’t make me wear a mask! you can’t make me take the vaccine!….. So if you don’t wanna do something….. the government shouldn’t force you…. what a concept!…… pro-choicers have said it for years…..
@@TyrianHaze Lol dummy!…… Vaccine mandates are over with…. Covid is gone….. But if forced-birthers had their way, no woman could get an abortion ever again….. They want the government to stomp all over women’s physical liberty and body autonomy….. Forever….. Who’s the hypocrite NOW?
I don't know about this its complicated as abortion being a constitutional right is debatable. The government should not at all be in control of life period. However the man should also have this right not to pay for child in these 9 months
@@chuckthebrindlepittie6820 what I was trying to point out, if we want government to be completely out of a women's choice to have baby or not, then also the man should have the possibility within that 9 months to opt out being responsible for the child , if you decided to have it, or not to have it. Since your still asking the government for help to get money from the farther, after baby is born then of course farther has to be responsible. you know? it will never work being just a one sided matter
@@andrewcharlton2709 I think unwanted pregnancies should end in legal abortions at the earliest date possible, prior to fetal age of viability. Now that the Supreme Court has made that virtually impossible, men, as well as women, need to be very careful indeed. The landscape around this will get uglier, more complicated between the genders. Everyone should be afraid.
MY BODY MY CHOICE IS THE MOST STUPID LINE..FIRST OF ALL ABORTION IS NOT FOUND ANYWHERE IN THE US CONSTITUTION..SO THEREFORE IT IS NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS..SECOND IF YOU DONT WANT A BABY TO GROW INSIDE YOUR WOMB..WHY DID YOU OPEN THEM LEGS??WHY DID YOU NOT PADLOCK YOUR UTERUS..A MOTHER SHOULD BE THE FIRST TO PROTECT THE BABY AND NOT THE FIRST ONE TO MURDER HER OWN BABY..
@@sarah29. aah yes, I should ask you whenever I wanna have s3x, you should also name my child, also, when I die, I should name my property to you as well.
Do you think infanticide is murder? Then raise those children. It’s that simple isn’t it? Do you think bank robbing should be illegal? Then support the children of bank robbers while they are in jail. It’s that simple isn’t it?
Maybe if you all want to force women to not have an abortion. Maybe force men to actually take care of their children with that same vigour.
What about the men who do not want the baby? How do you then alleviate their financial responsibility? In any state if a woman filed dot child support the state will ensure they receive it. They will imprison them if it is not paid.
@@christophersmatla1932 I think most people are in shock at what your posting 😲,Are you saying if you have a biological child (your blood) but you don't want to be financial responsible for it ???? Is that what you are asking???? 😧
Maybe teach women to keep their legs closed and choose better partners, instead of being so promiscuous. Oh… but it’s the man’s fault.
@@christophersmatla1932 You're so close to seeing the actual point.
Here's a hint. I'm pro-choice, and I don't agree that men should be forced to take care of a child they never wanted to have either.
@@eliesh3833 I used to be pro-choice until I saw some videos of the baby trying to get away as it’s being chopped up. Gross I know and I don’t say this lightly. To me it is a question of what Murder is legal. If the state allows it and the parents are ok with it Then it is what it is. A doctor can make that decision if a woman’s life is in danger as well. The whole thing makes me sad.
Abortion is murder, and murder is illegal. It doesn’t matter if you were raped or involved in incest. You should not kill a baby for the sins of the father. The child should be the only thing good that comes out of it. If a mother should have a choice, whether she lives or the baby lives, and she chooses her life over the child’s life, that would be one of the greatest sins. Her life at that point is no longer valuable. Always choose a child’s life over situation.
Actually, something is only murder if it's already illegal. Murder is a.legal term.
@@vincentproud6589 You have both zero common sense,and ignorant at the same time. At some point you’ll realize you are better off, moving off grid away from society, and innocent people that should never be exposed to your stupidity, incompetence and influence!
It really is not.
If I'm going to cause sadness or not be able to provide things to the baby, it's better to abort.
I'm talking about early abortions when there is not even limbs or digits on the fetus.
It doesn't have a consciousness to feel the hurt or even what that was.
It isn't a grown fetus.
Please stop this madness of pro life pro abortion.
Keep abortion accessible. If someone wants to get one, they should be able to and if someone prefers not to then please don't.
@@vincentproud6589 it’s fn murder! You take a life, it’s murder! Fn pug!
@user-zx7eo7nu4b
No. Murder is a legal term; it's only murder if it's illegal and under specific circumstances. That's just how words work.
People need to understand that forcing someone to go through something as hard as a pregnancy AND birth should be entirely up to the mother because its HER body that will suffer.
Including if it means killing someone for that matter?
Her body will suffer and so would the child who never had a law to protect him or her.
what you fail to understand is the majoirty of abortion cases are not becuase of rape or incest but because aborition is being used as a form of birthcontroll.
That’s murder! Heard of birth control?
What about the killed baby?
why do liberals beleive that 1 woman’s right is more important than ALL of a baby’s rights? it’s the baby’s body, not hers. women can get tattoos, implants, surgeries, they DO have rights to their bodies. saying they don’t have rights to their unborn child’s life (or rather death) isnt their body. so where does the “my body my choice” arguement have any logic or validity?
It really is not.
If I'm going to cause sadness or not be able to provide things to the baby, it's better to abort.
I'm talking about early abortions when there is not even limbs or digits on the fetus.
It doesn't have a consciousness to feel the hurt or even what that was.
It isn't a grown fetus.
Please stop this madness of pro life pro abortion.
Keep abortion accessible. If someone wants to get one, they should be able to and if someone prefers not to then please don't.
BTW that map is now outdated, the 11th circuit just allowed Georgia to enforce it's 6 week abortion ban
Bad reporting, the majority of Americans support access to abortion. Mississippi and Alabama are the minority, not the mainstream. And as far as options for restoration of abortion rights, your research was extremely lazy and incomplete.
Florida tries to ban abortion adverts ruclips.net/video/5BuiktGH6f8/видео.htmlsi=VsEZtRteY_mQJDp5
So tell me, where is there ANY "right" to commit pre-meditated [first-degree] murder - or for that matter - steal my money to pay for it ? How do people imagine that they have any "right" to do this ? Spare me the special cricumstances such as rape, incest, or the life of the mother. I don't know of any one that does not make an exception in these cases. But to simply murder the baby because it is not wanted is beyond my imagination - just like everything else that Satan and the Democrat Party are trying to impose on humanity. Do I have any "right" or obligation to prevent the murder of unborn babies? Abortion is not a solution for to unwanted pregnacies. If there is any valid reason for makeing first-degree murder illegal, then there is also a valid reason to make this sort of abortion illegal as well.
? "....lost your legal right to an abortion ..." ? No one has ever had a "right" to commit pre-meditated first-degree murder. Who has told you there is any such "right" and why do you believe it? There is no government in the universe that has the "right" to make a law that says you may do this. "A premeditated intent to kill requires that the defendant had intent to kill and some willful deliberation (the defendant spent some time to reflect, deliberate, reason, or weigh their decision) to kill, rather than killing on a sudden impulse. Prior planning and deliberation are often closely intertwined. Courts focus on the “pre” in premeditation, and generally look for evidence that the defendant deliberated and subsequently formed the intent to kill prior to the act of killing. This is justified because the defendant must have thought about the murder for a period of time and did not change their mind. There are several factors indicating premeditation and deliberation. These include: lack of provocation from the victim, actions and words of the defendant before and after the killing, any threats from the defendant before and/or during the killing, whether the victim and the defendant had a poor history, whether there was an additional lethal attack after the victim was already helpless, evidence of brutality, and the nature and number of wounds." Can you define an Abortion for accurately than that ? No. Abortion is pre-meditated murder of a perfectly innocent baby. AND YOU KNOW IT! "The U.S. averaged 82k abortions monthly in 2022, 90k monthly in 2023, and is averaging around 99k monthly so far in 2024. The number of abortions performed in the U.S. continued to climb in 2024, increasing 11% in April to June this year, compared to the same period last year, according to a national report released Tuesday. Aug 7, 2024"
Less than 1% of these pre-meditated murders were for the sake of rape, incest, or the life of the mother. I absolutely despise the Democrat for trying to "legalize" the outrageous murder of innocent babies. May God Almighty deal with you ever so severely for your affiliation with the Democrat Party and this cardinal sin against God and Humanity.
I thought they didn't know what a women was a couple of weeks ago.
It is not ok to murder helpless humans. Talk,talk,talk, ..don't make murder of innocents ok. Exercise your reproductive RESPONSIBILITIES!!! NOT MURDER.
3:53 you forgot one major thing, the people don't mean squat to the government
Thank God millions of babies will live
@@Timbergal Amen!
The people who think the government just got more powerful, that is.
@@Timbergal LOL! You do realize this means not only fetuses, but women will die from unsafe abortions now? Good job! Double kill just like you wanted!
@@Timbergal Babies were never going to die, look up the definition of a baby, an acorn isn't a tree.
We need to ban viagra and other drugs like it in response.
yeah if you cant get it up naturally, you shudnt be squirting.
Not a right to murder babies.
Not a right that at 21 weeks mothers and their infants go in to have the babies limbs torn off.
Explained by ex abortionists they drain the sack and then grab whatever they can and literally pull off whatever limb their forceps can grab. Not cut. Yank.off.
They arent cells. They arent clumls.of flesh.
Do you want to know the depth of the weeping of the mothers who found out that 21 weeks is long enough for the baby to live outside the womb? Yes live. As in in before that they were indeed alive inside the womb.
Or of the abortion clinic/satanis temple in new Mexico called samuel alitos moms satanic temple, where they take the still alive babies from the mother to the other room? Where the mlthers often have no.idea their babies are screaming but just unable to make a sound yet while you all argue about them just being clumps of cells?
I hope this doesn't happen in the UK.
?
We riot if they try
Is the UK filled with gullible zealots?
The U.K isn't quite as stupid as America .
It will eventually. It'll happen all over the world. It's inevitable, you can't stop progress. The availability of birth control has made abortion unnecessary. Civilized people now consider it to be an archaic, barbaric, medieval form of birth control and see no reason to allow it. Banning it is no different than banning slavery. Those who still defend it are on the wrong side of history.
It hinges on the response at the polls. If the party in power is delivered a defeat then in the following election the pro-life politicians will skirt the issue knowing that to bring this issue up again would mean another defeat at the polls.
Ah yes the party in power… the Democrats?
Suuuure because US politicians care so much about what citizens want
Not necessarily anything's possible if these cold harded narcissistic conservatives can put in all of the work in order to eliminate a woman's right to whatever she wants to do with her body. Thereby shutting down almost half of these planned parenthood clinics in what I refer to this country and continent DSA which stands for the decided states of America sense this fallen country ours. Is refusing to get itself from off of the ground and start standing on it and what I mean by that is the citizens in this country need to learn how to criticize a person in a positive way and not a negative or there'll continue to be insulting words coming out of peoples mouth's until the first day of Armageddon. And that's something that I refuse to see or be apart of until then this country doesn't deserve to called the United States of America. Because this country isn't even trying to make an effort in uniting mainly because there's such deep dark history throughout this country and continent so for those that true citizens and patriots of the country no not to keep saying that we in the greatest in the world when none these are true. It's because half white America's refusing to own up to the fact that this land that half of America keeps saying the ignorant words this country and land when. Deep down inside half America has no problem saying that this isn't our land meanwhile the other half of America has chasen to remain arrogant and cold harded instead of being loving and warm welcoming.
@@AragornRespecter *Vaccine existing* is to *20th booster*
As
*running stop signs* is to *T-bone accident*
I agree this is what things typically hinge on; however, like most on the left (not saying you are) you are missing something. The ruling against Roe V Wade and abortion was not the result of republican politicians or even their influence. Despite what you hear from them; this was purely a legal decision. I understand if most offices were held by democrats, abortion could be made law, but to attempt to hold republican politicians responsible for the reversal in Roe v Wade is just ridiculous and short sightedness.
Fortunately, the re-criminalisation of abortion in Canada through legislative and/or judicial means will not see the light of day. Evidently, abortion has long remained a 'proverbial' third-rail of Canadian politics.
SO HOW TO WOMEN GET THEIR BODY INCLUDED INTO THE CONSTITUTION?
Abortion is not about the Woman’s body so much as it is about the *pre-meditated murder* of perfectly innocent babies. No one has any "right" to commit this heinous crime. Who has told you that this is a “right” or that you can make other people pay for abortions if it is declared by the Democrat that you have a “legal right” to murder your baby? This is absurd and totally evil.
Is there no evil thing the Democrat does not support and facilitate?
Hope this happens and the usa gets its abortion rights back
Unbased
there is no right to abortion, because there is no right to murder
They didn't lose them. Go educate yourself to the facts
"...gets it's abortion rights back" ??? What "right" do you imagine exists for pre-meditated [first-degree] murder of a perfectly inocent baby? Who has told you this is your "right" - and why do you want to believe it? Why do you think any sort of Satanicly inspired, man-made Govenment law can make this OK? "Reproductive Rights" ? This is an absurd phrase. The topic is not about your "right" to reporduce/pro-create! It's about the pre-meditated murder of inocent babies -- and-- trying to make it "legal" so the govenment can steal my money to pay it. *"First-degree murder is the most severe form of murder defined in the US legal system. In these cases, the crime is committed with the intent to cause harm to and kill the victim or victims with no regard for human life."*
Both sides need to come to the aid of a fetus' rights, as the mother can defend & has rights for herself. If not, the USA will become a UNBORN baby's # 1's worst national killer on the planet.
Why does the supreme court not make it law that every rapist gets a vacectomy....hmmmm.....let me think long and hard about that one🤔🤔🤔
Maybe because the Supreme Court doesn’t make laws? How are people so uninformed?
@@SlyFan-mp8dcso you're super informed with every justice system, politics, laws of every country in the world? Good for you👍.
PASS the law🤷♂️? I dont care who does it...that wasnt my point!
@@mynameiseve.1 Then what was your point?
1st, abortion for rape victims is not outlawed.
2nd, they did not ban abortion, the states get to decide, and citizens can move wherever they want.
😂 you stupid. Supreme court not Made law . But judging the law whether it is in accordance with the constitution
They better do something because they’ve made inbreeding legal in the United States of America , One blood family member making another blood family member pregnant that’s called in breeding, and they are forced to have the baby oh my goodness, One never knows what will happen,
Yeah sure it is epidemic....
That is absolute rubbish. No one is being forced to have any baby.
If yorkshire in uk decided abortion is illegal, and you lived in Bradford, what would you do?
You'd go to derbyshire, or notts or lancs to get it done.
They aren't tying women to beds for 9 months don't be so ridiculous.
Each state makes its own law, just like each country in eu does so. The eu court has not issued any ruling on abortion, and us Supreme Court just did exactly the same thing. They said, its not up to us to decide. So the states each decide. They do so for THEIR population, based on what the voters want.
If a citizen doesn't like it, they can freely move to another state. There are no boundaries.
Also rape and incest victims DO have a legal right to abortion.
Tell me, do you agree with California who HAVE legalized abortion at 9 months?
A doctor either delivers the baby and just leaves it to die of starvation and exposure or injects it in the womb to stop its heart before aborting it. That sound right to you? Or does it sound like murder?
Who needs 9 months to decide they don't want a baby?
That's what this is all about.
The 2 extremes. Those who want a total ban, and those who want to legalise murder. And the Supreme Court washed their hands of it and said YOU decide. It is not a constitutional right... that is all they ruled on.
The Supreme Court are guardians of the constitution and ONLY rule on and hear cases regarding constitutional matters.
If congress wants to make it law, they can. But they won't, because they know they will lose far too many voters.
So they tried to dump this on the Supreme Court so they could blame them. And trump for some unknown reason since he has nothing whatsoever to do with this. The Supreme Court decide they weren't going to do the dirty work for spineless politicians.
And now it's being used to try and paint the republican party as the devil. Which is simply not true.
The president, btw, whoever it is, CANNOT make this decision, any more than king Charles can do so in uk. The president is like the monarch, with politics included.
That what you want?😊
Not a right to murder babies.
Not a right that at 21 weeks mothers and their infants go in to have the babies limbs torn off.
Explained by ex abortionists they drain the sack and then grab whatever they can and literally pull off whatever limb their forceps can grab. Not cut. Yank.off.
They arent cells. They arent clumls.of flesh.
Do you want to know the depth of the weeping of the mothers who found out that 21 weeks is long enough for the baby to live outside the womb? Yes live. As in before that, they were indeed alive inside the womb.
Or of the abortion clinic/satanis temple in new Mexico called samuel alitos moms satanic temple, where they take the still alive babies from the mother to the other room? Where the mothers often have no idea their babies are screaming but just unable to make a sound yet while you all argue about them just being clumps of cells?
"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe
The unborn do breathe…
@@TheMrSONIC4 It’s extremely telling that that’s the part of that whole quote you’ve focused on.
This makes no sense at all. It is clearly the exact opposite of what you say. The unborn are easy to forget about. Born children are the ones who cause the burden - that is why you want to avoid them being born, right?
@@hottiestbiscotti8164 Of course! That info alone makes all the difference!
@@TheMrSONIC4 🙄 oh Jake go away
For all the uninformed Brit’s out there unable to mind there own country’s business- the Supreme Court did not outlaw abortion anywhere. All it said was that the constitution is neutral on the issue and therefore it’s left to the democratic process just like in every other developed country. Any restrictions are not from the court, but from democratic majorities. By the way, roe was extremely radical in allowing elective abortions for 24 weeks. Most countries’ abortion laws, including the UK, France, Denmark, and virtually all of Europe apart from the Netherlands, would be struck down under roe.
I also don't understand the logic behind expanding the court. What happens when Republicans have the house, senate and also the White House? They would want to expand to make sure they get the supreme court verdicts in their favor. Is it supposed to go on and on? Peope are so short sighted, they don't realise that if it wasn't for Harry Reid to change the rules in order to appoint Federal Judges Trump probably wouldn't have been able to appoint three Supreme Court judges.
@@willwell4450 unfortunately leftists operate on emotion instead of reason. So yes if democrats expand the court then republican voters would demand the same when they’re back in power and we’d end up with a court bigger than congress
I think the rest of the world might legitimately consider not minding America's business, when America starts minding its own business. Hmm? As well as there being general greater awareness of the US, as the worlds cultural hegemony, than other places and empathy for those effected by the defacto loss of rights (whatever the institutional or legislative route), there is also the worry that when US conservatives sneeze, British ones catch a cold.
Don't worry we mostly know the media lies constantly in the UK
😂 is this an American say mind your own business 👏🏾😂👏🏾😂
Bravo
I will once you lot do yea
We need for the Democrats to control Congress. If we had that, we could pass a bill protecting women’s right to abortions in perpetuity. If we DON’T control Congress, that bill will be impossible. THEREFORE, VOTE DEMOCRATIC IN NOVEMBER!
If women in certain states are forced to carry a fetus, maybe men should be required to get vasectomies. Since the right to abortion is taken away in many states from women, men should have the same happen to them with vasectomies. What is apparently good for the goose is should be good for the gander. It takes two to create a pregnancy.
Not a bad idea. However, in all cases the unborn should have a shot at life.....remember 50% of the unborn are women.
@@historyrepeated4239 One issue is equality between men and women. I am a male but believe that men ,many times, have no idea what they are doing. Men do not have wombs thus should have zero say in the topic of abortion. Men should shut their mouths on this issue.
@@Toto-cl8rw Men should be hunted down and be held accountable for every life they create. No exceptions. The value of an unborn life should not be determined by the means of how it’s brought into the world. They cannot control that their mother hosts the womb. It’s ironic how you opine on who should speak or not speak, despite your mother giving you the right to life. The fact that you’re alive, negates your stance on who gets to live or die doesn’t it? You’d be advocating for your own destruction.
@@historyrepeated4239 what I am saying is that the sperm initiates the growth of the fetus. Most abortions are performed within the parameters of Roe V/S Wade. Roe V/S Wade was compromise, and the world cannot exist without compromise, and give a take. At least it was a fair decision on both sides. Now that is gone, and an unfair result, against strong public opinion favouring abortion.
The government should not be allowed to decide on what a women decides. If my mother had decided to abort me at birth I would still on her side. It was her prerogative and right to decide.
Circumstances were favourable when it came to my birth. The time was right, the family could afford me,etc.
I do not think life would be the same for me if I was forced to be born and then rejected or put up for adoption. To me that is more cruel than abortion.
@@historyrepeated4239
Fetuses aren’t women.
Congress doesn’t have the authority to regulate abortion
yep unless the constitution is amended. im glad the courts are actually doing their jobs now.
Florida tries to ban abortion adverts ruclips.net/video/5BuiktGH6f8/видео.htmlsi=VsEZtRteY_mQJDp5
US States are still free to legalize abortion. I think this is the point of the originalists. Rather than having nine US Supreme Court justices force states to legalize abortion by "discovering" that the constitution guarantees the right, it is really a legislative matter that should be decided democratically. I must say, however, that the variety of state laws on this matter will give rise to bewildering legal complexity.
what’s wrong with america right now? In the 1960s, the ‘falling rate of profit’ caused the value of labor to fall so low that unions started forming, there was much pressure on the private sector to fix the labor issues by the media, and the government, in other countries they just started investing more in labor, but in America, a guy named Lewis Powell, a corporate lawyer talked the republicans and chamber of commerce into having the corporations just pay off the media, government, and politicians. This is all in the ‘Powell memo,’ and not but a few years later they got caught in the act during the watergate controversy, soon, almost all American manufacturing moved overseas to cheap labor colonies and Ronald and Nancy Reagan answered to the corporations by shining a light on abortion as a Republican voting issue and they shed a light on people who had actually no power whatsoever, black welfare queens who were not hired by small businesses and were abandoned In inner cities by both the growth from white generational wealth leaving in white flight and the manufacturers who hired them leaving the country. They married these issues to pro corporate legislation that a working class voter would never vote for. They claimed to be conservative but their economic policies multiplied the amount of feminists and housewives and mothers in the workforce from 60s and 70s and that caused crime to go up because no parents were home. Dark money was so successful that the private sector became the government and the democrats, a historically working class party that can never actually pass anti working class legislation soon joined that dark money and they are now a controlled opposition of the donor class, the same donors that own the republicans own the democrats, they are paid to introduce and block working class bills when they are in power, Democratic politicians want to be seen As incompetent against the republicans but they are laughing all the way to the bank every time someone like cenk calls them incompetent, they are not incompetent at destroying the progressive agenda for instance. Right now fox is telling its viewers there’s too many workers in the market and that’s because they are paid by the corporations to cushion the fall of a mass layoff so elite class can lower interest rates and invest again. If america was a production economy like before 70s when they gave all the jobs to China and Mexico instead of a ‘financialization’ / gambling economy, the elite class would still be making profits producing goods but all they do is gamble now. For thirty years the conservatives have had a majority in Supreme Court and tons of cases over abortion that could’ve overturned roe, why didn’t they? why now? Because Georgia and Arizona went blue, I’ve been keeping an eye on this for a long time, republicans gerrymander and throw out voting rights to cheat elections in these red states that their donors would never step foot and refer to as ‘fly over country’ but people keep moving into those states because cheap rent and property. Them axing roe actually isn’t enough to get people to stop moving there because abortion clinics weren’t available in most of these states before roe was even overturned, that’s why we’re going to see contraceptives become outlawed. if you follow the money you will find a donor class desperate to keep republican states Republican so they can continue paying gop politicians to pass corporate bills instead of paying dem politicians to sit on their hands.
@@lessimcdowell9897 Unions were formed decades before the 1960s. Perhaps read a book or two, yes?
@@DrGingerHamster lol, do you disagree with the main narrative of my poorly written on iPhone response? didn’t mean to make it sound like unions didn’t exist before 1970s
@@lessimcdowell9897 My apologies. Yeah, I likely misunderstood. I get your point however. Thank you.
Imagine, anyone but the unborn themselves, deciding what the value of their life is. This is not a power struggle between women's rights (unless the woman is in the womb) and the reach of the federal gov't. It is a matter of who speaks for the value of the unborn life. Of course, nobody is qualified to determined the value of an unborn life. It's too bad there are too many derelict fathers out there that put too many women in this position. That's half the problem. The other half is looking at abortion being a solution to solve a problem.......at the cost of an unborn life.
I say if women want to have an abortion go ahead have an abortion, but you pay for it. Don’t make the taxpayers pay for the areas you screwed up in.
If a woman is rape, coerced, or the baby is deformed - what then?.
@ yes what then? Is it the taxpayers fault she got pregnant to begin with are you saying we should pay for the abortion?
Judges that are Christian should have to recuse themselves because of a conflict of interest with separating church and state. Abortion and contraception is a christian belief banned by the Pope.
The religious arguement of life begins at conception is actually a perfectly easy case to make secularly as well.
A human fetus is a stage of human life that's scientifically irrefutable.
Daniel Joo; NOT SO. There are many religious who do not believe in abortion, not just Catholics. RIGHT TO LIFE.
Where is "separation of church and state" written into law? Also, personal religious values doesn't not equal "church."
@Baxter
An atheist shouldn’t remove women’s rights EITHER…..
Abortion isn’t a religious issue, it’s a Liberty issue……
either a woman can get one or she can’t……
No, please don’t say that!…..
The majority of Christians are pro-choice….
the majority of pro-choicers are Christians…..
Most Christians are reasonable people who can see the difference between holding a private belief and executing public policy……
It’s just extreme rightwing fundies who have trouble with the concept…..
Abortion is not protected under the Constitution murder is not protected
Cry blood. Abortions have won every time its on the ballots. My state overturned abortions last year and I am glad because no child deserves a world like this. Having a child is the most selfish thing anyone can ever do. You only want the unborn babies born so they can suffer. Your movement of pro life is sadistic. I call them pro sadists because they want children born so they can suffer.
@@ageis3250 The United States is not a theocracy. Given the zealotry of abortion opponents that abortion violates God’s Word, it might come as a surprise that neither the Old Testament nor the New mentions abortion-not one word. In fact there may be evidence to suggest The Book Of Numbers might even encourage it: 21-27.
Numbers, chapter 5.
Numbers, chapter 5.
@Paraphrase1-Z9 Not a right to murder babies.
Not a right that at 21 weeks mothers and their infants go in to have the babies limbs torn off.
Explained by ex abortionists they drain the sack and then grab whatever they can and literally pull off whatever limb their forceps can grab. Not cut. Yank.off.
They arent cells. They arent clumls.of flesh.
Do you want to know the depth of the weeping of the mothers who found out that 21 weeks is long enough for the baby to live outside the womb? Yes live. As in before that, they were indeed alive inside the womb.
Or of the abortion clinic/satanis temple in new Mexico called samuel alitos moms satanic temple, where they take the still alive babies from the mother to the other room? Where the mothers often have no idea their babies are screaming but just unable to make a sound yet while you all argue about them just being clumps of cells?
You will not get this privilege back sorry 😞.
Do I have white privilege?
Saw a yt short that said that if the mother dies during forced childbirth they should also then kill the father. Because if they're going to force one parent to endanger their own life, then it should be equal.
Honestly, it kinda seems fair to me 🤷
If men's lives were on the line I wonder how fast we'd see these bans disappear
And if a woman kills her unborn baby she should be hung.
So if the human fetus is killed intentionally, does that mean the mother, father, "doctor" and state governor should all be killed too? Seems very silly to me!
@@wordforever117 stop calling whores who kill babies ''mothers''
To hear Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana lament about infant
mortality rates in his state and blame
the fact that people of color are the
reason these rates are so high is shocking. Maybe he’d prefer people
Of color be treated as 3/5th of a human
being. And this guy is a doctor.
Planned Parenthood convinces the ignorant that they should have an abortion..intellectuals need no convincing it is their "right" to kill their baby which they consider as a "parasite"...
Rape and incest are 1% don’t use that excuse for murder
Exactly.
A Brit telling Americans what to do? No ma’am, not since 1776. Bye.
?
Democrats had decades to do this. Democrats make more money fighting this issue.
Right and they're stupid people who fall for this.
What are the rights of the father of the child 🤔
What are the rights of he child to be aborted ?
Does the mother have 100 % rights of the child nut when born the fathwr must pay money 💲💶💵💳💷 ?
How does that work.
The ferus created from two origins
Father and mother !!
Its not the mother's body here being violated.
Its the body of the Fetus !!
Anyone ever think ?
It is now up to the individual states, rather than liberals sat in cities hundreds/thousands of miles away. If the majority of people want something, it gets voted in and vice versa. This is better than painting all the states with the same brush and expecting everyone to be happy about it. Roe v Wade being cancelled was the right thing to do.
Why leave it up to the states, why not counties? Surely a democrat city in a Republican state should be allowed to decide this for themselves.
@@friccinfrosty4677 That's already happening. Some progressive cities have vowed to not 'enforce the law' in that state. It's going to be interesting to see how this all shakes out.
@@DrGingerHamster Hadn't heard about that, good to know!
That divides society. The matter is Roe V. Wade, not how it affects the politics of republicans or conservatives. A fetus is not a baby, nor is an embryo a baby. The cherry picking republicans are real. The stage where people get an abortion is usually the stage where they bear an embryo or fetus within their womb. They are the precondition to humans, but they are not babies. Philosophically or otherwise.
There are still liberals in every city advocating for the right stuff. Abortion should be a centralized human right; the consideration to keep yapping on about fetuses (which are not babies, they are literally not) instead of people who are actually alive and in need of help is the most disgusting cherry-picked action republicans have done so far.
RVW was not cancelled. The democrats are acting quickly now. A democrat city in contrast within a republican state will mean the republicans have a stranglehold on the road areas to that city through law, and so on and so forth. That not only divides communities further, but it gives rise to more sinister neo-nazis, fascists, and conservatards.
RVW will get codified. The Liberals are lobbying everywhere, it's not just in states where evil conservatives cuck their way into the law so they could feel, even if for a little while, that the World revolves around them.
@@friccinfrosty4677 we will do everything we can to stop it.
Abortion ‘rights’
The right to kill? No thx!
>"rights"
@@MmM20978 Oh but we do, that's why everyone's got a gun at home remember 😉😉
@@jamieconnolly6290 Let’s see guns for self protection or killing innocent life?
@@MmM20978 killing innocent lives at school, America's specialty😁😁😁
This isn't a "reproductive rights" issue. It's a "cull my unborn child" issue. It isn't a human rights issue, it's a human wants issue.
That fetus is totally human. Yes it's small, dependant, in the uterus and not fully developed but do these circumstances dictate that it has no rights? I'm 58 yrs old, 6'6" tall, 245 lbs. Do I automatically have more human rights than a new born? I'm bigger, much less dependant, much more developed and not in utero. Certainly I don't have more human rights than my very young relatives and friends.
Answer this please! Why is no one talking about the reproductive rights of unborn human women?
There are six things the Lord hates, seven that are detestable to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
God loves rapists though....
How does he feel about killing unborn human beings for convenience?
Evangelical Christianity needs to be put in its place.
Yes, it does, the lunatic asylum.
@@rachel.mcgowan Keep the Same Energy about Islam
@James Mohler, agreed. Let's start with taxing the churches.
@@thetonetosser Let's start by protesting in front of them.
@Attila Hun All those red states can stop getting free money from the blue states then. No more local government you free football stadiums either.
i’m in the uk so fortunately we are not going through this delicate subject
i believe that we have enough forms of pregnancy prevention but they are not 💯 guaranteed
i believe that women have the right to choose to end their pregnancies under a time limit ( i feel that 20 weeks in the uk is too high and should be like 12) also some women are not fit to be a parent and women who are victims of rape should not have to go through the pregnancy if they choose
i’m sorry but if a woman is made to have a child against her will there could be a whole heap of problems down the road
The truth is that you just enjoy seeing innocent babies ripped apart. People who support abortion have no morals.
They count from the first day of the last period not from fertilization. Some have longer cycles than others so its not easy to set a low limit cause then some are over it even before haveing a chance to know they are pregnant
Also some medical stuff you simply cant know really early.
But that is NOT what is happening in usa. I dont believe a single state has decided that abortion is illegal for rape victims. In vast majority of cases they have a limit of around 16 weeks.
So please don't believe this alarmist garbage spewed by ch4. I'm british I live in Michigan. It really is no big deal to anyone apart from the nutters on the left and the crazies in California who have legalized abortion up to and including birth.
Sodom and Gomorah
The best hope for abortion rights in the US is Jane's Revenge. "If abortions aren't safe then you aren't either"
I didn't see this outrage at lockdowns, so I guess women love abortion more than they love their own freedom.
@@isaacvazquez627 How are women free when our choices about our bodies are disregarded and taken away from us?
They aren't pro life they're pro forced birth and its ridiculous.
@@isaacvazquez627 abortion is freedom? Plus if you wore a mask you were still free to do whatever?
try that in a conceal and carry state. see what happens
Of course, all commie revolutions must start with violence. Yes, we've read the playbook...
Accurate reporting/researching aside, don't you find it outrageous that we'll abolish the death penalty for convicted murderers--that is we MERCIFULLY let them LIVE--BUT we allow innocent not yet born babies/foetus to be KILLED UNMERCIFULLY!
God Bless this Supreme Court.
And God Bless the Dobbs decision.
DeSantis, 2024
NO. TRUMP 2024 BOT.
God Bless - this is a big win!
this is why we wont win the election. we are too split on who we will vote for. and yet the democrats will all focus on one person.
It's hard to make legislative changes when you don't have the votes. For all the talk about the supposed support of abortion, the truth is people support it being RESTRICTED but legal in the first trimester. The Dems or almost any state could pass that.
I would have expected a modicum of understanding of the American governmental system from this reporter. Alas. I was disappointed.
For ch4 read democrat screeching luny banshee. 😊
It's murder in my opinion.
It really is not.
If I'm going to cause sadness or not be able to provide things to the baby, it's better to abort.
I'm talking about early abortions when there is not even limbs or digits on the fetus.
It doesn't have a consciousness to feel the hurt or even what that was.
It isn't a grown fetus.
Please stop this madness of pro life pro abortion.
Keep abortion accessible. If someone wants to get one, they should be able to and if someone prefers not to then please don't.
How could you not mention the ability to pass a new amendment of the constitution making abortion a constitutional right, this is the only permanent solution and you didn’t even mention it? Yes the likelihood is near impossible but seems like a pretty major point to miss out. You also didn’t mention the dangerous precedent allowing numbers of justices to be expanded sets, it virtually defeats the point of having a judiciary and makes it completely politicised even more than it is today
Eventually they will be talking about expanding congress/the senate/the presidency if an election doesn't go their way. But not until they lower the voting age to 16 to lock in even more brain dead votes.
There is no right to murder the helpless. You should be drawn and quartered.
You could make the case its a 9th amendment right.
Don't you get it? The "Government" has no say whatsoever to "legalize" pre-meditated [first-degree] murder. Make all the "laws" you want. It's still a horrible crime to murder innocent babies - no matter how you label it. "Reproductive Rights" ? That's phrase has nothing to do with any imaginary "right" to commit murder. Your "right" to reproduce/pro-create has nothing to do with a fictitious "right" to commit murder.
Educate me - the 9th amendment is in regard to rights not specifically listed in the Bill of Rights. It cannot be applicable to something that is not- and never has been, and never can be a "right". Where you people imagine their right to murder innocent babies is established?
If I'm on a diet and I see someone eating a cookie, I should not tell them that they aren't allowed to eat their cookie because I'm the one on a diet.
If im a vegan and I see someone eating steak, I should not tell them that they aren't allowed to eat steak because I'm a vegan, because it doesn't affect them, my lifestyle is not their lifestyle and maybe they can't go on a diet because of health issues. I am not the person who should decide what they can and cannot eat, only they can.
Just like how someone who believes abortions are wrong should not dictate whether I should or shouldn't have an abortion, because it's my life, not theirs. And if they're a stranger they have no right to tell me what I can't do with my body because I can't tell them what to do with theirs. It doesn't affect them, only me.
if you're against abortions and don't want them then you don't need to have one, but it's important to have that option for the person who might need it.
Romania illegalized abortions back in the 1980s I believe and it didn't help them at all, there were babies on the street dying because they were forced to be there. It didn't save children, it made children suffer alone because they weren't wanted, and the women died trying to get rid of them
Except, that nobody agrees with you On need the side of the argument
There is no question that pregnancy will turn into a viable human being.
Your argument, is that it’s yours, to decide whatever you want to do it. Does that include up till an hour before birth?
The other argument is that it’s a woman’s right for what is a medical procedure; which falls right into the category of state control.
It’s ridiculously complex situation.
@@Ont785 Yea if it's mine and it's gonna affect my life, it is my choice and my choice alone. And if giving birth to it will kill me then I don't see why I shouldn't have the option to abort.
@@pinkkkkkkkkk
So there shouldn’t be a restriction on time.
why have a restriction at 26 weeks, why not six months after it’s born?
@@Ont785 I believe restrictions on time is fine, I'd probably cut it off after the first 2/3 weeks after the third trimester has started. A six month year old baby can process pain, is breathing, heart is beating, thinking, etc. It's not just a clump of cells anymore. A fetus is just a clump of cells, it can't feel pain, it doesn't have a heartbeat during when most abortions take place and it's not breathing
@@pinkkkkkkkkk
Thank you doctor, lol.
Thank you for raising awareness
Of? Killing babies?
@@MmM20978 there are no babies getting murdered. It’s a embryo / foetus.
@@StrawberryLaces2012 which is a developmental state of a human being.. its not static. if left a baby will be born..
@@elcristoph7380 right, but at that current moment it’s not a baby. A foetus is not a person which therefore gives it no rights.
@@StrawberryLaces2012 Well not exactly, the question of who or what we bestow rights to is a societal one, (and yes historically unborn children had the rights of life and inheritance)..
when its reduced you're argument is basically that because its still growing its ok to kill it.. which isn't very convincing..
Liar
Isn't just me, or is the supreme court being unconstitutional
It's just you
What Tommy said.
Well Roe v Wade was hanging on the right to privacy...I'm not a lawyer, but I'm in good company when I say that's a stretch, and sidesteps the entire argument about when a fetus has a right to life. The justices who voted against the overturn didn't argue it was constitutional, they argued it's a slippery slope because other rights are protected on similarly shaky ground
@@a.i.l1074 yea, it was always very flimsy.. if the USA wants federal abortions' rights then it will need a democratic mandate..
Im not american...
But can u explain what kind of constitution that the SCOTUS breaks?
I thought,after Roe V Wade being overturned,The Federal States are no longer in position to intervene abortion.
But instead it's given to The Individual States,The 10th Amendment of The Constitution says :
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Hence,the decision are given back to The Individual States,how does The SCOTUS being "unconstitutional"?
The Overturn of Roe V Wade does not prohibited abortion,but it is The Individual States who will
Correct me if i'm wrong
How on earth does any one equate the 14th amendment with the imagineary "right" to Abortion/pre-meditated murder?
Transcript
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the *male inhabitants* of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such *male citizens* shall bear to the whole number of *male citizens* twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Where do you find anyting whatsoever related to the imaginary Womans Right to an Abortion? With or without any sort of Originanist interpratation ?
It's simeply not there. Never has been, and there is no "right" to commit pre-meditated murder.
And what is pre-meditated murder ? Murder in the first-degree.
" Prior planning and deliberation are often closely intertwined. Courts focus on the “pre” in premeditation, and generally look for evidence that the defendant deliberated and subsequently formed the intent to kill prior to the act of killing. This is justified because the defendant must have thought about the murder for a period of time and did not change their mind.
There are several factors indicating premeditation and deliberation. These include: lack of provocation from the victim, actions and words of the defendant before and after the killing, any threats from the defendant before and/or during the killing, whether the victim and the defendant had a poor history, whether there was an additional lethal attack after the victim was already helpless, evidence of brutality, and the nature and number of wounds. However, many jurisdictions concede that there is no bright, arbitrary line when premeditation begins and ends."
This is what Abortion is. It's absurd to even emaine that this is in anyway related to he 14th amendment.
50 million. That is the number of abortions since 1973 that were elective procedures, not needed for medical or legal reasons, but purely for ridding the inconvenience of having a child. That is a low estimate out of the 65 million total. That is a bigger population than any US state, and closer to making two state populations. And abortion is still alive and well, you can still have an Abortion up to 9 months in New York, other states have cut it down to not include people using abortion as contraception. More than 20% have had at least two abortions, and 8% have had over three. The Supreme court simply moved the matter back to the states, just like cannabis and legal gambling. In which everyone was happy about.
-That is the number of abortions since 1973 that were elective procedures: So? I'm not really sure how forcing women to have babies that they couldn't care for is a good thing...
-You can still have an abortion up to 9 months in New York: Most women seeking an abortion in anti-choice states cannot afford to travel. Those women also face legal liability for such traveling, including if the procedure is meant to save their lives
-The Supreme court simply moved the matter back to the states, just like cannabis and legal gambling: SCOTUS has never decided on the legality of cannabis. Nor has it decided a case regarding gambling in state law - Only in the Federal context. This was a removal of a right that women had.
And no, everyone is not happy about this.
Does any human have the right to use another body without their consent?
So who's paying for those 50 million _extra_ unwanted children in 2022? _Do you actually care about their lives and well-being, Harsh?_
@@TheLegendOfRandy "Once you're out you're own your own" is a sentiment I've seen many give, which goes to show they care more for a fetus than a born child and mother combined.
Murdering is a SIN, wages of sin is death,and that's why America will fall
Based based AND BASSD
God willing they don't get it back because it ain't a right.
Dont American women know about contraception????
And yet I get called evil because I don't have a mask on at the school football stdium
Incredible right? Let me kill my unborn baby but you better wear this thing on your face or you can't see your child cheerleading or playing ball. Makes me sick.
Golly Gee whiz Wally…
if being forced to wear a mask is outrageous…..
imagine being forced to give birth against your will!….
That’s a lot worse in case you didn’t know…..
What if you were forced to wear a mask for NINE SOLID MONTHS?….
@@hexl702too5 wow, clown
@@hexl702too5 imagine living in a backeards world where being maskless isn't okay, but killing a baby is
Calling the president of one country, "the most powerful man in the world", is a huge stretch, and very rude and misleading to other countries. Yes, the US has a lot of influence on other countries, but we are equal to other countries in many ways, superior in may ways and inferior in many ways. Its also important to remember check and balances, which keep the president in check. That statement is just neglectfully a hyperbole.
I'm a Christian, and one of God's commandments says "Thou Shall not murder." So I am so thankful that more babies are being saved!
P.S. Trash me all you want, I fear God more than anybody else
hopefully this message will inspire persuade encourage motivate females to take back their divinity from males.
8 billion of USoAs are 100% equal bags of our mothers skin filled with our grandmothers muscles!
we all live on planet Earth within blue planet.
humans, people are bags of nutrients, sustenance, food, fruits, vegetables, grains, and mothers meats.
all humans grew in our mothers uterus and are 100% bags of our mothers!
The only 3 differences; scoop earth, soul, and history.
The true pure all-natural cures for pregnancy, infectious parasitic Sexually-Transmitted Disease Venereal Disease is already built-in working perfectly miraculously effortlessly and will never fail your mom, thank Mother Nature a.k.a. GOD!
Fatal only to Females preeclampsia eclampsia sudden-death of pregnancy must be prevented proactively requires a daily sweat equity 3×3:1 be your own medical doctor primary care provider with a complete recipe Grandmotherly-TLC-123.
There are 3 GOD built into 1, Your mother, Our grandmothers, and Mother Earth.
1. Your Mother gave you birth, so your mother is GOD.
2. Your Grandmother gave your Mother Earth, so your Grandmother is GOD.
3 - Our grandmother was given birth by Mother Earth Blue Planet, so GOD.
65-year-old black male have always cautious of White males but not fear of White males and no fear of God because I know with absolute certainty males killing females wholesale don't go to jail it certainly white males groomed to become serial killers not go to jail back to the death penalty whereas black males get shot in the back of White males and they get memorials promotions statues streets named after them for being baby killers.
And god kills more unborn than we ever could. Twenty percent of all pregnancies end in miscarriage.
wow🎯
Congress are the ones to decide whether or not abortion is ok, and they need to pass such laws.
The Supreme Court only interprets the law.
The constitution needs a new amendment that protects abortion of an embryo, but you need to tell that to congress. Shitting on the court does not make a lot of sense imo
I’m ready for the long fight.
Same. and I’ve got contacts who can get girls and women to safe abortion clinics who will perform the procedure for fair cash amounts under the table.
What are the actual rules of abortion? Upto how many weeks? These are the rules that should be set straight if ever Abortion becomes legal. And it should be under very valid reasons. Not just because they simply wanted to or didn’t want to. Pregnancy due to rape/incest or medical reasons that can endanger the mother’s life should be the only reasons and nothing else. And should only be done when the embryo is not yet formed at all.
What is a woman?
xx chromosome
A teletubby
A creature who can give birth
@@dominusdone5023 even trans men can give birth
lol
@@sabijsoti8169 trans men, are women mate...
I alwyas thought America was a democracy so vote of people
This was a terrible representation of the situation, such lazy journalism!
Absolutely bang on!
It happened during Biden's administration period, thatz the problem, cant simply blame the previous
Man I love hearing about my countries politics from snobby foreigners. It's one of life's true joys
The say we suck....I know better
Shame does not sell to those who love themselves
@Martin are you one of the self loathing Americans I've been reading about?
@Martin ah I see. Perhaps one of the anti ppl from 2005-2015. Nah not a yes man fits the parallel speech patterns of the anti ppl but I don't see you as fully hooked. Good for you.
Why say no when it feels so good to say yes and change your mind later?
@Martin you're awesome bro!! Go on you way thinking thats the case. Oh you will fail now and again but so what....still awesome.....still a chance to achieve that which is beyond awesomeness.... the ever elusive funk.. you get there i know it!! Go martin...yess sir!!
@Martin cool strawman bud. Truth is USA isn't failing any more or less than we've ever been and certainly no more than any other country. Trouble at home does an Armageddon make know what I'm saying? Of course we have problems, it's not like it's a big revelation, but I have very little interest in hearing about it from foreigners because the fact is they are biased like everyone else; they're just biased in a way that comes from THEIR society not mine.
Abortian is concerning to me, if there’s a place in the country where it’s legal to have a medical procedure and you live in a state where it’s not legal that your state can decide what you can and can’t do with your body, which is essentially based on a religious idea,”
"YOU still have the SAME heart that began beating in your mother's womb" ~Houston Kat
I bet you have no adopted kids in your household.
Yeah, so a fetus can sense, so what??
Oh and don't forget, now a days even a person born a male can become pregnant so I guess it's also "your father's womb"? 😂😂😂
@@III............ What does this have to do with anything?? u triggered or what LOL
Everyone in this country has the right of bodily autonomy. It’s why you can’t force someone to give blood, or donate an organ. This right is still in effect after you die, and is the reason why the government can’t just come in and take all your organs after you pass on. Now, having said that, if you say a woman can’t have an abortion you are doing two things; you’re giving the embryo rights then any person already born, and you’re giving a woman less rights to her body then a corpse
actually 8 billion humans 1 DNA 1 genus 1 species 1 family ... Began procreating by male dominance hate rape incest million years ago ... have the exact same bag of skin filled with our mothers muscles going back to before the dinosaurs beginning of blue planet, when our greatest grandmother's was 4 footed running circles around T Rex.
Don't Murder Your Children.
Abortion is murder only in the delusional minds of the Prolife control freaks since no anti-abortion laws would trigger murder charges.
the most simple thing that democrats cannot understand
@@WeakestHater Amen
You might've mentioned some very useful information: Progressive Democrats are necessary to protect such rights. Other Democrats are for sale to the highest bidder, or they are Democrat In Name Only. Run and vote Progressive.
Good job supreme court 👍👍👍
More like disgusting humans
‘Huge step’ as abortion access changes
Tue, 11 July 2023 at 8:12 am AEST
Undated : RU486 abortion pill - medical drugs tablets RU-486
All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it in a major change to abortion rules in Australia.
All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it as new rules are brought in.
Until now, prescribers and dispensers of the two-part medical abortion treatment needed extra certification or registration, meaning only about 10 per cent of doctors and 30 per cent of pharmacists are currently able to deal with the pill.
But from August 1, restrictions around the MS-2 Step will be removed, in a move the government says will “improve equitable access to healthcare for all Australians”.
Nurse practitioners - who represent about one per cent of nurses - will also be able to prescribe the medications under the PBS.
Deceptive headline at best. So many liars, so little time.
venom?
Hi can you make an updated video about the inability of democratic party to codify the bill supporting reproductive Freedom.
You don’t need a video. Congress has no authority to regulate abortion. It is a state police power. Glad to help
You never had a right to an abortion that's how rights work you have every right you'll ever have there is no such thing as positive rights
You have all your rights, that's between you and freedom. Sometimes there is a third party infringing on those rights, those rights don't go away, they're just repressed. Tyranny only gets as powerful as we allow it to get.
Right to have an abortion is not a positive right, it does not mean forcing someone to provide you an abortion then that would be a positive right, they are talking about the right to be allowed to have an abortion. Meaning the individual pays for it and the person providing the service is doing it voluntarily. No one’s individual rights are being violated in these circumstances. The only individual right being violated is the right to your own life and ability to do what you choose with your body which is being denied by state governments
Uh, yes, actually, they do. Their bodies, their rules. Period. End of story. And you aren’t going to stop abortions. In fact, I’ve got contacts to get girls and women to safe clinics through my employment, and I intend to do just that for anyone who needs one.
@@jacobmacdonagh4070 I hope your daughter gets pregnant at 13. Then you can watch her ruin her life with the baby she isn’t mature enough to handle because you wouldn’t let her abort
@@emmawieson2121 Did you read my comment? I’m pro choice, I’m saying abortion is a right. I was making the point that abortion is a negative right and not a positive right like the original comment was saying
Nope prolife wins again
Welcome to Gilead
That's funny! Gilead...🤣
Honest question. Have you read the actual book? I haven't. Perhaps you have.
This is always also debated and free damn year and if we live in a democracy why weren't we given in the freedom to vote on this
Before exporting democracy to other countries, apply democracy to your home.
you do realize that by passing it to the states that's exactly what the court did..
$evfm
ahh yes, the illiterate internet hobo who doesn't know anything about democracy but loves to complain about how any kind of political conflict in the country is antidemocratic. Tell us more about this democracy that you speak of.....
@@elcristoph7380 You mean the same states with gerry-mandered districts, where candidates can promise abortion laws that mean women who have miscarriages now have legal liability?
They are only Americans. The metastasis of the world.
Should never be a political issue. Once it is, it becomes a problem that can never be solved. Too many variables. It’s not the governments job to solve personal problems. It’s not the governments job to pay for the cost of personal problems. Percentage wise it affects a small percentage of women. Probably 5-10 percent. Heath wise you can’t ban abortion and legally you can’t force the population to pay for it.
At best ,the government should insure that all health facilities meet the strictest standards and then stay out of it. The Constitution doesn’t guarantee abortions!
You never had the right to abortion.
You do not have a right to murder a baby period...
⍢⃝♥️⍤⃝🍎⍥⃝🍉⍣⃝🍒⍨⃝🍓
⍢⃝🧡⍤⃝🍊⍥⃝🥐⍣⃝🍔⍨⃝🎃
⍢⃝💛⍤⃝🍯⍥⃝🍋⍣⃝🌻⍨⃝🎗
⍢⃝💚⍤⃝🍏⍥⃝🥝⍣⃝🥑⍨⃝🍀
⍢⃝💙⍤⃝🐳⍥⃝🐟⍣⃝🐬⍨⃝💎
⍢⃝💜⍤⃝🍆⍥⃝🍇⍣⃝👾⍨⃝🔯
Right to commit murder !
What a joke
This news reporter looks very beautiful,no need to show skin.only little makeup,well dressed and gender behaviour,hygiene.
Democracy rarely suits everyone. And as abortion isn't a constitutional matter it is a legislative matter, either at the state level or the federal level.
Packing the Supreme Court would also have a negative fall out.
There are several solutions to the matter on an individual level and a legal level.
Attacking the Supreme Court for just doing their job is pretty daft though.
Rights are not a legislative matter. It is 100% a constitutional matter.
@@joebidenisyourpresidentget2481 Abortion is not protected under the US Constitution. Denying reality may be the fashion for some at the moment, however it's not a productive choice.
@@URBeingLiedTo The right to do what you want with your own body is protected. The government cannot force you to get a surgery nor can they deny you from getting a surgery. The same kind of freedom applies to abortion.
@@joebidenisyourpresidentget2481 Some people don't agree that abortion is a right as they feel it is killing an unborn life. So as it's not protected under the constitution, it has been returned to the state legislatures. So it's up to them to work through this issue or for the Federal Government to put laws in place.
But feel free to think what you want to think 👍
@@URBeingLiedTo I dont care what you believe. A fetus is not a person. A egg cell is not a person.Its up to you to mind your own body.
Why is a British broadcast company getting involved with a US policy issue? Fix your own problems, bongers, like your grooming gang issues
Hahaha. They're scared that it might affect their country. The US has enormous influence and impact in the West.
when it's immigrants doing the grooming they'll have it on the early morning news then sweep it under the rug.
So if someone gets raped they keep the baby? Ok 😂
Alabama wants to be how Alabama wants to be and that's how it should be.
Indeed, marrying their cousins and hating everything non white and gay.
Yep.....CONFEDERATE FLAG FLYING..BACKWOODS..my BROTHER is my COUSIN AND my UNCLE is my DADDY disgusting type SHYT
Alabama believes that nine year olds need to be giving birth. Is that really what Alabama should be?
Abortion is a violation of baby’s human rights.
So the baby has the right to violate my body.
It’s a foetus and a foetus is not yet a person so has no human rights
@@hahahaaha7208 The baby didnt ask to be there.. you had to make a series of choices to lead up to that point..
@@hahahaaha7208 Anything that can move naturally is a life, whatever they are in the world, and more importantly the mother is its roots for living.
Always with hating women with you folks
How many states are common law?
It is a fact that life starts at conception. The most liberal, athiest scientist will not disagree with that
@REEEEEEE . Scientifically speaking, a new human life begins at the moment of fertilization where a completely new DNA is created that has never existed before and will never exist again. The sperm itself is not considered a distinct human life according to science.
When it comes to adoption, there is more demand than offer when it comes to the adoption of newborns.
Sadly we're dealing with a bunch of bloodthirsty lunatics who just want to murder innocent lives because the majority don't want to take responsibility for what they chose to create.
I trust that every single person who subscribes to the 'sanctity of life' philosophy in their opposition to abortion is also opposed the death penalty. The odd thing is that there is an anomalous correspondence between states now reverting to abortion bans and the continued use of capital punishment.
@REEEEEEE . no sir. A sperm is a chromosome male or female. At conception when a sperm and an egg meet, a distinct being with its own DNA and with its own identy has come into formation
@REEEEEEE . the rest of your argument is abhorrent. We do not kill to better society. African nations, which are statistically impovershed, do no kill there starving villages to make the general populace better off. Even though that would work it is a eugenics argument.
The reason pro lifers are against abortion is that they believe that the unborn child is alive, and that there is no such thing as a right to murder another human being. The reason that pro choicers don't agree is that they were told not to by their betters. That's really all that the debate comes down to.
@@TyrianHaze
lol you blob of cells…..
Covid was a public health emergency….
Abortion is a private medical decision…..
You can’t catch pregnancy passing somebody in the store aisle…..
@@TyrianHaze
Rightwads: You can’t make me wear a mask! you can’t make me take the vaccine!…..
So if you don’t wanna do something…..
the government shouldn’t force you….
what a concept!……
pro-choicers have said it for years…..
@@TyrianHaze
Lol dummy!……
Vaccine mandates are over with….
Covid is gone…..
But if forced-birthers had their way, no woman could get an abortion ever again…..
They want the government to stomp all over women’s physical liberty and body autonomy…..
Forever…..
Who’s the hypocrite NOW?
I don't know about this its complicated as abortion being a constitutional right is debatable. The government should not at all be in control of life period. However the man should also have this right not to pay for child in these 9 months
Why. The cost of pregnancy -- prenatal care and delivery -- often costs in excess of $10,000. The sperm-producing male initiated the pregnancy.
@@chuckthebrindlepittie6820 Um...in a criminal situation. If consensual, she also said yes. Come on now...it takes two to tango.
@@chuckthebrindlepittie6820 what I was trying to point out, if we want government to be completely out of a women's choice to have baby or not, then also the man should have the possibility within that 9 months to opt out being responsible for the child , if you decided to have it, or not to have it. Since your still asking the government for help to get money from the farther, after baby is born then of course farther has to be responsible. you know? it will never work being just a one sided matter
@@andrewcharlton2709 I think unwanted pregnancies should end in legal abortions at the earliest date possible, prior to fetal age of viability. Now that the Supreme Court has made that virtually impossible, men, as well as women, need to be very careful indeed. The landscape around this will get uglier, more complicated between the genders. Everyone should be afraid.
The man can wear a condom. Men don't risk their lives to give birth. It's different. A man should absolutely be forced to be pay child support
With the repeal of legal abortions we can expect more back ally procedures,baby’s left in dumpsters or otherwise abandoned and women ER visits.
Oh please, nobody took anyone’s rights away, go to another state!
Jeremiah 1:5
5 “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.”
MY BODY MY CHOICE IS THE MOST STUPID LINE..FIRST OF ALL ABORTION IS NOT FOUND ANYWHERE IN THE US CONSTITUTION..SO THEREFORE IT IS NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS..SECOND IF YOU DONT WANT A BABY TO GROW INSIDE YOUR WOMB..WHY DID YOU OPEN THEM LEGS??WHY DID YOU NOT PADLOCK YOUR UTERUS..A MOTHER SHOULD BE THE FIRST TO PROTECT THE BABY AND NOT THE FIRST ONE TO MURDER HER OWN BABY..
You didn't actually read the constitution did you?
@@Pk-io6xe You don’t have to read the constitution to know that abortion isn’t a human right, a simple google search will suffice.
@@teampls4312
According to you. Maybe you should read the constitution
People who are like "it's mrdr", raise them, raise those children then, it's that simple, isn't it.
How about simply dont open your legs! It would never have been a problem then!
@@sarah29. aah yes, I should ask you whenever I wanna have s3x, you should also name my child, also, when I die, I should name my property to you as well.
Do you think infanticide is murder? Then raise those children. It’s that simple isn’t it?
Do you think bank robbing should be illegal? Then support the children of bank robbers while they are in jail. It’s that simple isn’t it?
Too late. Ask the fetus when it is 18 years old if it should be here or not