The Russians have the CAPABILITY to deploy all three legs of the 'nuclear triad' (air launched, surface/silo launched, and submarine launched missiles). Currently dues to costs, mostly only land-based and submarine missiles are being used.
Yeah, so hypersonic missles are very easy to detect, from launch too. Ehat makes them dangerous is their difficulty to be intercepted. Which actually isn't too difficult either. The missles have to reach very high altitudes during their trajection which means that when they come down they can be easily intercepted by slow moving missles. How? By figuring out their flight path, which is incredbly easy for modern military computers and personnel to do. If you don't believe me, look it up. Why this creator tried to make a big scare about hypersonic missles is beyond me.
I have worked on the argis system amd it can take every missile Russia has even warheads. You have no idea what your talking about and nuclear missile are aegis also. The aegis system send ballistic missiles over 800 miles in land.
@@Typexviiib The Patriot missile system is a piece of crap. It’s alway-on radar makes it easy to hit. It can’t intercept most of the missiles in the Russian inventory. For one.
@@jag5316 Russia hasn’t managed to cause serious damage to one yet, despite spending over 250 million dollars in missiles trying. They spent 120 million dollars to scratch the pain on a launcher in one night. Try again. “Always on radar” where do you get this nonsense?
It's a good anti-missile system, but it can't knock down oreshnic (a hazel) tree. It's like shooting down a meteorite, or rather a meteor shower. The Aegis anti-missile system operates on a "fist-to-fist" principle. But the all-metal hazel warheads fall at hyperspeed in a plasma cloud (4000'C). Even if an anti-missile (sm_) hits a warhead, it's like trying to knock down an icicle falling from a roof with a snowflake. A completely different physical principle of counteraction is required here, but the existing missile defense against a nuclear strike (and the US has one) is not very effective against a hypersonic plasma bolide. So far, only Russia has such a missile-system (the Nudol rocket), but it also works 50/50 against hypersonic 🤷♂️🤫
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
A fair amount of people think missiles have rendered surface fleets mostly obsolete. Its always easier to attack with missiles than defend with them.
US Navy actually used AEGIS to shoot a satellite that was in orbit >> shot from a Destroyer several years back .
That guy has no idea what he's talking about I worked at Lockheed martin and we built the aegis system.
They are most definitely not designed to be difficult to detect. The missiles being shown are just normal ballistic missiles…
❤ his defense stories
None of the people really understand the ability of a 1 megawatt laser system
Unavailable due to charging of vehicles 😅
Whats with the Terminator 1 type music sharing lately.
Anyone notice the numbers on the Russian missile?
Большое спасибо за эту информацию, я передам своему командиру. Наслаждайтесь гамбургерами, мои американские друзья.
🍔
Thank you, hae a good day🍔
Well that was a mishmash of stuff.
Difficult to intercept? My brother in christ, basic patriot system can shoot them down.
Russia is anything but competent
😂😂😂😂
No one for talk about the AEGIS ship from Red Alert 2 ? Fine i do it my self then
The Russians have the CAPABILITY to deploy all three legs of the 'nuclear triad' (air launched, surface/silo launched, and submarine launched missiles). Currently dues to costs, mostly only land-based and submarine missiles are being used.
Don't ya Just Love how the US always point out their Weaknesses and tells their Potential enemies how to get through their Defenses
The aegis system can shoot satellites out of orbit that's has no idea what he's talking about. Where I work we build the aegis system
That's just scary 😳
Yeah, so hypersonic missles are very easy to detect, from launch too. Ehat makes them dangerous is their difficulty to be intercepted. Which actually isn't too difficult either. The missles have to reach very high altitudes during their trajection which means that when they come down they can be easily intercepted by slow moving missles. How? By figuring out their flight path, which is incredbly easy for modern military computers and personnel to do. If you don't believe me, look it up. Why this creator tried to make a big scare about hypersonic missles is beyond me.
America never fails never joke always real let's meet at the battle ground will know why USA is the super power up to date
😂😂😂😂
I have worked on the argis system amd it can take every missile Russia has even warheads. You have no idea what your talking about and nuclear missile are aegis also. The aegis system send ballistic missiles over 800 miles in land.
Well hopefully we never find out.
Metric! Not idiotic!
All we know now is that some significant fraction of US weapons system capability is hype.
WRONG. Actually, it’s Russia, whos weapons have the hype but not the performance to back it up. How can you be so wrong? 😂
So name one
@@Typexviiib The Patriot missile system is a piece of crap. It’s alway-on radar makes it easy to hit. It can’t intercept most of the missiles in the Russian inventory. For one.
@@jag5316 Russia hasn’t managed to cause serious damage to one yet, despite spending over 250 million dollars in missiles trying. They spent 120 million dollars to scratch the pain on a launcher in one night. Try again.
“Always on radar” where do you get this nonsense?
@@Typexviiib you live in a world of misinformation
It's a good anti-missile system, but it can't knock down oreshnic (a hazel) tree. It's like shooting down a meteorite, or rather a meteor shower. The Aegis anti-missile system operates on a "fist-to-fist" principle. But the all-metal hazel warheads fall at hyperspeed in a plasma cloud (4000'C). Even if an anti-missile (sm_) hits a warhead, it's like trying to knock down an icicle falling from a roof with a snowflake. A completely different physical principle of counteraction is required here, but the existing missile defense against a nuclear strike (and the US has one) is not very effective against a hypersonic plasma bolide. So far, only Russia has such a missile-system (the Nudol rocket), but it also works 50/50 against hypersonic 🤷♂️🤫
Write that down that's your homework
Hahahahahaha, you think this can get through AEGIS? Patriot alone is knocking their “hypersonic” missiles out of the sky.
This is idioti, that is not how missle defense or air defense works. It almost never has anything to do with air speed. What a joke, read a book.
Enter the Kinzhal.
@@Slight-patriot burned 😂
Quran burned, not a single patriot system though. 😂 @@mohamedhussein4124
@@mohamedhussein4124no real loss in comparison to all the Russian crap that’s been burned, in a way I do feel sorry for them.
@@mohamedhussein4124if by burned you mean slightly damaged and put back in service a few hours later you are correct.
@@mohamedhussein4124the name suggests a third world country.. don’t think you have an opinion on the matters of a real country🤣
Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!… 💪💪💪🇷🇺