We need to increase the amount of land covered by forests and jungles drastically. They're our best defense against rising temperatures. We're too distracted by technology when nature has so much to offer us at a fraction of the cost and it maintains itself. Better that than the alternative.
The deforestation makes since a 100 years, in average each 10 years an area half the size of India. That’s the cause of rising CO₂ levels, 280ppm to 420ppm since 1960. However, 540 million years ago, during the Cambrian, CO₂ levels were over 8000ppm, 20 times more as currently. No hot house earth, no boiling planet. That are measures, not models, having zero prediction value but can be tweaked suiting perfectly the political narrative.
Besides, below 200ppm, the flora starts to die, below 180ppm means end of all life as we know it on the surface on the planet. The survivors the micro biospheres surrounding the black smokers, 4 km deep submerged in the midst of the Atlantic Ocean.
It basically means a drastic reduction in much of general modern consumption, private motoring and global travelling, to name a few. Current commercialism together with human population growth and expansion is simply not viable, as the global average annual sustainable resource use now reaches the limit even before August. However, a minority of humans spend their share long before that, but still this profit based industry is supposed to grow. It's quite a mystery only how to make all the deniers/big consumers realise actuality.
The one thing you dont hear is that it is greenery that absorbs the carbon, and as a race we have chopped down more trees than at any other time in history because its easy to do. Nobody has said tbat for every tree you chop down you replace it with two of the same kind because trees asorb different amounts, so can take more than others. The other thing is the use of plastic which even today is still on the rise despite knowing that its not only Harmfull to all other life but also to us, and plus we are not very good at cleaning up after ourselves.
Hello I'm 65 about 40 years ago I worked for ept building a delta v power line in Queensland between Rockhampton and nebo, one day we came up on the Connors river roadhouse in the crystal highway, the petrol pumps had been torn out of the concrete along with the roof over them right up to the roadhouse itself, it was like surgery not a window was smashed , the roadhouse owner and his wife verified it was the wind, we could not even speak it was frightening to look at the detail of destruction was like an artist's work . The atmosphere speaks like that
Great show. I'm Canadian and we bought a pipeline that won't pay for itself for another 50 years...As one of the presenters in the documentary said, we can continue to do nothing but we are digging ourselves a much deeper hole to climb out of, and that has proved to be the truth. We will continue to do nothing substantial and we will leave a world much, much more different than the one we currently inhabit to our children and this is also a fact. The world will go on, the question really is will we?
Of all the lies we must deal with, Deliberate Omissions, are the most dangerous. Google search 2023 homeless in Canada. No new data for a decade?!!! . *How is that even possible?* "In Statistics Canada's 2023 review of Canadian homelessness data, the latest estimate they provide is from 2014. That estimate says 235,000 people experience “the many different types of homelessness” every year, according to the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, a research organization." I like Pierre, but... What do you think stops Poilievre from challenging Finance Minister Freeland in Parliament for holding a chair at the World Ecinomic Forum board of directors table in Geneva since 2019? The fact that that fact has never been reported in the Canadian Press for 5 years, should disturb all of us. Is PM Harper just as dedicated to the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset Agenda success as PM Trudeau and Finance Minister Freeland? The fact that he was at Davos in 2024 with Chrystia Freeland is compelling evidence that he is. Because of PM Harper, and deliberate Press failures to report the facts to the public, Canada is economically weaker than we think. Did you know that PM Harper sold off 100% of Canada's Gold Reserves at bottom of the market values? Did you know that Canada is the only G-20 country in the World to hold ZERO Gold reserves today? 100% true. The fact that that fact is never mentioned in Parliament, and (almost) never reported in the Canadian Press, should disturb all of us.
@@mujkocka Quebec is not powered by 95% hydrogen. And even if it was Hydrogen is just as bad at the moment, if not worse, for mitigation than the continual use of fossil fuels. It takes massive amounts of energy to produce, transport and store. And even when it is used H2O is the byproduct which is another greenhouse gas. Hydrogen is greenwashing.
@1:24:00 Some parts of Arctic has already warmed by 5C (Barents sea) or even 7C (near sea ice, Svalbard). So these "predicted" temperature changes are partially here already.
Not sure that I agree with it all, as for the wind turbines, only to give one example, which we know they are not zero carbon emission since their production is very costly: ecologically low-effective... I believe you will understand why. However, for most of the rest of the program, I have to say that I was amazed by the quality of the researches and the narration, which I found really compelling!
@@the_piper001 it is convenient for them; i wonder where has the ice before 800k years ago went. If we truly want to know the bigger picture, that has to be discussed. 800k years sounds a long time ago, but humans were already around on Earth by then. On the flip side, I am convinced that the rise in CO2 levels are caused by humans burning stuff, as explained around 34:40
@@10kmilesy i work in green houses and we add co2 to nearly all of them, long story short more co2 means better faster and bigger yields in all fruiting plants. adding co2 is not new and is done all over the world so yes we are doing it for sure 100% lol they even now have co2 kits for home gardeners "mainly the wacky tobacy". right now outside is just over 400ppm of co2 we go as high as 1200.
Look, the weather is controlled, manipulated and modified, it all started way back in 1946, the Americans actually said by 2021 we will control the weather. Co2 is too low at present, it is around 400ppm, it needs to be at 1000ppm to make plants flourish.
That is really a very interesting subject. I moved from Sweden to Thailand almost two years ago and the clouds here never look like the clouds do in Sweden. So I weren't sure if Sweden was doing it until I moved here and couldn't see any straight line clouds anymore.
Norfolk has a history of flooding, there have been less typhoons and extreme weather patterns in recent years, and the polar icecaps are following their normal cycle of variation, like they have been since polar bears were invented. Is the United Nations a criminal organisation? Just wondering.
This documentary is so true..Thanks for the great effort PBS America, every government must do more not only in talking and paperwork, and they must exert more substantial effort in protecting our planet, The Government must show the initiative and action to show as an example so that each citizen of a nation will see they are really committed to fulfill this important endeavor for our own future...but sad to say they did a lot of talking and tons of paperwork with a bit, tiny bit of action.
Because it based on understood scientific principles using fairly accurate data to make predictions and, to explain extreme weather events or climate trends..
"most people sense change in weather" Meanwhile, our winter which usually starts at December is now starting from January 20th while the December was warm
I've noticed seasons being later and later. Used to always have snow before Halloween and for sure deep snow by Halloween, now it's December/January before any snow adds up
@@MatthewBandstra-kt7yj If you changed location. Say to another state or to another elevation the weather can be very different to what you had at the previouse location. 500 miles can be a vast difference. It is very usual for there to be be variations from year to year with never an exact replication. This year here in England we seemed to have a mild December but a colder November. I tend to find than many many people are shocked at how their supposed summer never happened. As if it was over with in a blink of an eye. That suprises me or used to suprise me. But as a person who monitors tempretures and really feel the heat. I am usually aware that summer had been happening for the usualy length of time. They seem to be looking for the precise same peaks and if they do not happen they seem to miss the fact that for the usuall three months we have had long sunny days. I usually say that a person has to go out and experience it when it is happening. Otherwise it is easy to miss it whilst sat in an air conditioned room. You could easily miss a whole summer living in a new City with High Rise buildings casting penumbric hadows.
If we could just stop the wars, we would do much better . Taking care of our Oceans and Forests are the most important things we can do as humans who care about this Planet! ♥️ There needs to be co - operation not Confrontation !!
Sea level rise is estimated to be 12-20 meters at 2C warming by 2300 (State of cryosphere). Or 10-20 meters with current ghg's. (IPCC). This brings huge threats to all who live by the sea or near sea level in inlands. But this is only one threat that comes by the rapidly warming climate. Current warming trend is toward 3.5C. We can only stop making the situation ever worse. We need to stop burning fossil fuels. Today.
Any roofs of new construction should be finished white ,trees must be planted ,gardens must be grown instead of grass to feed the poor because poor people can pollute more. Tidal power is the greenest because it works all the time and not many use it. Heat is the big issue and we must use lighter colours for our surfaces to reflect the heat. Using energy from dead plant life is renewable untilized by gasification. Alge blooms need to be harvested and utilized for biodiesel production. The land fills can be turned into energy through gasification plants to run carbon capture plants. Lots we can do if we have less governmental corruption stealing tax payers money.
Brilliant stuff! I love science and nature, but I always had the sense that people who love the planet seem to hate other people. There are extreemists in all fields, but thoughtfull content like this will bring good resource management to the mainstream.
I don't hate other people, I don't hate humanity, I have immense compassion for everybody around me. But humanity is crushingly, appallingly stupid, we're ruining our ability to live, we're doing it to ourselves knowingly, and I cannot abide such senseless foolishness. I love humanity, but I hate our foolish, greedy, shortsighted stupidity. We're about to get what's coming to us.
lol and here we are adding co2 to all our green houses lol you hate us famers. we have burners running just to keep the co2 way up . fun fact you drop the co2 by just 20 ppm and you see with your eye and drop off in yeild in most fruiting plants
This situation describes the gradual rising of land elevations as it springs back after thousands of years of being crushed under the weight of continental glaciers. The west coast of Hudson Bay is known as one of the more dramatic areas of isostatic rebound where the land still rises at a rate of a metre per century
Now that we have a theory about changing the climate through trapped carbon release, we fly all over the world to attend conferences on climate change, we ship goods all over the world by sea and air, we have been burning gases, byproduct of petroleum extraction, to keep the lights on at night generating light pollution, we maintain a naval fleet constantly on the go consuming oil, we start wars to sell weapons and detonante bombs as a business, meanwhile we cry wolf regarding climate change... Neurosis any one...
@1:13:00 Even higher national security risk than rising sea level becomes from rising toll on climate events that drives nations in the wars for vanishing resources. Vanishing mountain glaciers and rivers will bring major threats to global security. Already we can see nations nearing the war on water in Egypt, Gulf nations and so on. This will only worsen due to coming warming with extreme heatwaves, droughts, wildfires and floods. Also military emissions are not going down, because the equipments that they use are not done with greener technologies. Current global spending spree on militaries will make sure that future emissions remains at high levels for decades to come. Military emissions are not even measured due to "national security reasons". But that is a FALSE statement, because greater national threat is the climate change.
These feelgood optimistic endings to these programs has helped get us into this mess. Tech is not going to sprinkle pixy dust and stop this locomotive that has so much inertia. We need to be afraid of how far we have let this go, very afraid, and scared into evasive action globally.
They’re not asking. It’s just being presented that way for the purposes of telling a story so more people will (hopefully) get it. The stance is clear from the start.
The way I understand it , is that the increase in vegetative sequestration as CO2 concentration rises is likely to be much lower than the number mentioned. There is more to it than just tree mass. There is soil carbon retention and the changes in water and nuitrient availability as completion for these components increases with the demand to increase tree mass. And macro environmental effects like draught and temperature and salination and the change from forest to Savanah are also negative feed back effects to the absolute volume of fossill fuel emissions that the vegetation can absorb. There is still more bad news to come on this as research and models catch up. Trees are part of the preindustrial carbon cycle equilibrium. Planting trees, or even expecting existing trees to sequestrate more can never be the reason to keep burning fossil fuels. Emissions trading schemes have done enormous damage by pretending there is carbon equivalence of tree and fossil fuels.
Not a fluke at all...concreting fields, building houses on floodplains and big expensive houses in fire prone mountains like california is why the weather is causing more trouble than before, overpopulation, 2 hundred years ago ,these same events would have caused little or no damage to people as there was no one there, there i said it
It’s not so much distrust of government but science denial. Many people are not adherents to evidence based thinking. They believe in concepts implicitly without citing any evidence to support their perspective often in the face of very substantial evidence that points the other way. Evidence-based thinking needs to be better represented in the school system (the resistance to teaching young people about natural selection and evolutionary biology is a good example - there is no need in science to provide counter theories unless based on demonstrable evidence). Climate science should be looked upon with an open mind. Of course scepticism is part of the process of finding credible solutions to important questions but it needs to be rational
Last 40 years has shown that we are not "clever enough" to climb out of the climate emergency that we have created. Emission has been only ever rising since scientists have alarmed everyone. 28 COP's and onyl worst emitters are allowed to make this body to increase their profits. Coutries hits in last months by major extreme climate events: Saudi-Arabia UAE Oman Brazil Kenya Tanzania New Zealand Bangladesh Spain Portugal ... Coming hurricane season will be wild. More than alphabetical number of named tropical storms and 2-8 major hurricanes are shown by the models. Our food production is under major threat, because the harvest season is becoming unpredictable and swings are reaching 20C making normal conditions to freezing ones (ie. Finland). Also many areas are under heatwaves, droughts and floods. We are losing coral reefs (4th global bleaching event, NOAA) while also losing dolphins and seaweeds (ie. Spain). We are already seeing changes in food security and amount of the people under hunger (UN). It is time to stop burning fossil fuels. Stop making situation ever worse.
Soon as I'm up and running I'm coming to help out I'm almost there with my project to create a great deal of wealth just lacking actual cash lol but i will manage eventually to help.out our world ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Is there a reason the acidification of the ocean was not mentioned? Was that corn field that does not till the soil a GMO crop? There must be a change in carbon absorption for farmers using chemicals in their operations? I did not see any reference to this aspect either, but both highly problematic.
Amazing, almost perfect. We will immediately link to our product's homepage. This is a product page aimed at reducing the amount of air conditioners used, which was recently posted on the Japanese Ministry of the Environment, so please allow this as the purpose is the same. However, the perception is that the situation is about 20 years worse than the simulation from 40 years ago, so I think there is still some oversight. One is the phenomenon that a Japanese university proved last year that as the ocean temperature rises, it emits CO2. Another thing that comes to mind is that when CFCs were abolished, they were replaced with CFCs that added carbon, making the gas dozens of times more effective at warming the planet, and cooling efficiency also declined, resulting in more CO2 being emitted than before. Isn't it related? I agree with the complete abolition of CFCs used in spray cans, but I think it was a mistake to remove the CFCs from car air conditioners and replace them with alternative CFCs, and there is a possibility that a lot of CFCs were released. And there's something I've been concerned about lately. Is it really eco-friendly to charge EVs, which emit a lot of CO2 during manufacturing, at night when there is no solar power and then drive them during the day? If the number increases further, I think the correct answer up until now will become incorrect. This may still be true in the United States, where nuclear power generation is in operation, but depending on the state, CO2 emissions may be increasing due to charging at night. Now we need to think carefully.
“…whether something similar in the atmosphere was doing the same thing…” is redundant. Corrected: ‘…something in the atmosphere was doing the same thing…’
Hate to be simplistic but could we just not cover non farmable land with trees its sustainable renewable and a source of building material. If you do a quick calculation if the rain forests hadn't been touched we wouldn't be in the mess were in now. And trees are cheep compared to the other ideas been knocked around.
The CO2 & CH2 are past previous peaks now and still claiming. In the past, it peaked and then dropped quickly as shown throughout the show. All things being equal and applying the "Basic Physics", the proverbial pendulum swing will be equally drastic and "planet changing".
@123.00 climate model inputs are sorely incomplete to be anywhere near accurate. They nowhere near predicted the temperatures of 2023, the hottest year on record.
Adaptation is simply not enough. Without stopping emissions, specially burning fossil fuels, there is no planet where we can survive. 7C teperature rise or over by 2100. Most of the farming due to lack of stable climate will become impossible. And that is the downfall of the civilization and will bring us neat extinction. Human extinction scenarios begins at 3C upwards. Try to adapt the coastal cities to predicted 12-20 meters of sea level rise (or much more, because this is for only 2C warming). When situation goes really bad, we will have billions of refugees and many wars will start. We can only hope they won't be nuclear wars. Only real alternative: Stop burning fossil fuels. Today.
Just out of curiosity 9:30 It is mentioned that addressing the issue will be "enormously expensive". So how expensive is human survival? Because i can go ask the Bank for a loan or borrow them! I wouldn't want to be the only human that can afford their survival... :P
Have these scientists ever thought of the Great Flood (?) when our Creator and Living God destroyed the complete earth because of the evil of mankind that time? And rescued Noah, his wife and his 3 sons with their wives and a lot of animals in the Arch ??? That's why they found shells and organisms in the earth.!!!
there are only three countries that us Imperial measurements (feet inches fahrenheit) they are USA and two banana republics why don't you realise this when you make a video for a global audience
There's one country cant spell use. What drives me mad is the countries that use half and half, example the United Kingdom. Wind and road speed MPH imperial, weights, volumes and (lengths as in lengths you buy) metric and of course plumbing just has to be imperial. So you ask for two meters of three and quarter inch copper pipe. Mind you here in Ireland plumbing isn't any batter.
Hottest xyz on record. Maybe we should check in on the data points of these records. Copernicus I believe is the organisation providing this data. When do these records start? Oh they changed that. Yeah didn't hear much about it. Starting all the way back in 1979. No not a typo, not 1879, but 1979. Hmm
I've seen several climate change graphs where data conveniently leaves out earlier that that would make the graph less dramatic. Let's face it, it is big business now.
Considering in late 1970s to early 1980s, there were record snow accumulation. (Ontario Canada). In 2021 a WW1 bunker was discovered when "climate change" melted the glacier on a mountain (Scorluzzo). For the cave to be accessible in WW1, the ice could not have been there, and came after. Also consider the "Dust Bowl" in the 1930's, the area was not developed back then. If Global warming is in total from fossil fuels, how does that explain Glaciation Periods where the world's temperature changes every 100,000 years or so by at least 10°C (18°F). Some studies have it at 15°C (27°F). Now ask what would you like to face, (highest estimate) average temperature of 21°C (37°F) (Iowa summer 43°C (110°F))., or a mile of Ice covering 35% Iowa. North of Iowa would be 3 miles of ice.
Why not try redirecting the warm water flow away from the extreme North and likewise the southpole too , We do direct huge volumes of water to our desires now. Plus they put white sheets on glaceurs ,why not start anyway?
As long as the banks and the insurance companies give out long term loan's and insurances to beach properties I don't believe in this. When they stop I'll buy one 😂
@@kellywinston5811 So the prices of beach properties are plummeting because people can't get loans or insurance on them anymore? Guess I'm in the buyers market then 😂
Hi, I kind of agree with you, but in many cases like bushfrires and floods they don't cover anymore, or exorbant annual premiums. Actually, did you see that 25M beachfront mansion ready to collapse? If you haven't, let me know and i will try to find it. Cheers! 👍
they normally broke before they realise things like that happening :D they not have Crystal balls or anything more than ordinary people, more than estatistical risk data and math based on the past. they may be even more missinformed than you or me. you are giving bank and insurance companys more powers than they have. they only profit and bet with the past risk data in their favor. and even this way, they already are asking for more money for flooding in advance of past data, expecially in coast areas., when it start to flood evidently more they will wont give insurance for flood on beach areas anymore.
They're working on predicting the climate of the future by using historic data. Predicting the weather for the next few days into the future is a different thing.
@@GloryDaze73 Nice try. 1000s of weather reporting stations, 100s of satellites, and you are trying to tell me it's easier to predict weather/climate over the long term not using any of these modern tools? PS: still waiting for the polar ice caps to melt like they predicted in 2012.... or polar bears to go extinct (eventhough their population is HIGHER than it was in 2012). But hey, 98% of GOVERNMENT FUNDED Scientists agree....
Build loads of cheap boat drones with a fan and pump to circle the Arctic and use the sea water to pump the water to the fans and make snow and as they are so cheap to make send thousands every month
In the atmosphere, water vapour varies from 0-4% while carbon dioxide varies from 0.038-0.043% at any given moment in time ... has anyone been doing the OBVIOUS science of tracking the H2O molecule? ... instead we pull our hair out regarding the CO2 molecule. H2O is periodically100 times more plentiful and it's power to alter the temperature is 1000s of times more powerful. Now, how, as a dumbfk (like me) say that? 'cause I live in the real world, OUTSIDE ... how much does the (radiant) heat go up on your skin when the sun comes out from behind a (H2O) cloud? ... milliseconds. Just how much CO2 would be required to do that? well SCIENCE says that it's not a straight line effect, it's an exponential curve ... not the way you're think though, we are approaching the flat section where you add a whole shtload of CO2 and nothing detectable happens to the temperature. Do the science ... with the number of satellites in the sky now we should be able to classify H2O percentages globally at any moment in time, why is nobody doing the science on H2O and temperature? Ever notice what happens when you by a (let's say) a Volkswagen ... suddenly, wherever you look you see Volkswagens. Perhaps obsessing on CO2 just allows you to invent more places to see CO2 and IGNORE the obvious ... what do you think? not even possible? SHAME on you. Sure wish this documentary was not so over-the-top biased against science in it's true form while purporting/insinuating to be the exact opposite. Do you know why working horses on the farm had bridals with blinders on the sides? ... they were there so the horses concentrated on the work at hand ... straight ahead. That is what this video is all about, to encourage you to keep YOU "looking straight ahead" and miss EVERYTHING else around you. If we (humans) were less arrogant ... thinking that we HAVE to be a force of nature, perhaps we would admit that we STILL don't know ANYTHING. My advice: TAKE OFF YOUR BLINDERS or you will be so far down the rabbit hole that you'll be useless to the species.
what i find funny is no one talks about food, in our green house any of them that we do not up the co2 in we have a 100% air exchange rate as if the co2 drops even 20 ppm we start to see a drop offs in things yeild.
I agree with everything you say. Everything in this video has been debunked for decades but the truth doesn’t make the elites the money and give them control over us as Climate Crisis propaganda does!
Exactly. This is like watching a Hollywood movie just drama with no science. The more CO2 they stop the less food we will have. Everything in this video is not science, it is carefully prepared propaganda to push the global agenda because without it their narrative would fall flat in its face.
Climate Change is real and I understand ports like Port of Vancouver are being hammered by Climate Change, including atmospheric rivers. America's farmers and producers may want to redirect exports through Duluth, the Great Lakes and the Seaway. If independent investigation confirms Rome's grain port, portus, is now and always was, about 40 meters higher than current sea levels, then America's farmers and producers may want to export through Duluth, the Great Lakes and the Seaway which are much higher than current and future sea levels. You'll need independent experts in order to attract investors and infrastructure.
What if all the money that is now put on wars and unemployment were put on actions to increase forests and and other means to adverse the direction of destiny?????? Ex: pick up te Sundays and convert it electricity and convert that to hydrogen and run cars and industry with hydrogen, this way we keep atmosphere clean and do not use so much fossil fuels. etc. etc. etc. And put our scientists to think of even more methods to advance new methods.
As 180 ppm CO2 brings death, AND 400 ppm is current state of affairs, AND farmers put ca 1600 ppm into greenhouses it is evident that we need more co2 --- NOT less. Witness Jurassic time had even 9000vppm CO2. THEN Sahara and other deserts could become green rainforests like The Amazon. As all deserts would become green rainforests the sun's power to heat would be less as it would shine on green vegetation not on bare sand. What we are missing is an giganting air conditioner and the deserts could be the Missing Links. he problem is that the needed co2 is on the water of the oceans water. How to take it to air conditioner use is the get the water to the surface and it would by itself turn to gas form of co2. We would need gigantic pipelines to get enough water up to the surface of the seas, by pumping air into the pipes the bubbles would get th water moving to the surface. With Complimets. Ole Lindell
Climate change is both natural and man made, you have to accept both, by not accepting both you have the other side not listen. Currently man made climate change is out pacing natural change, but both are at play.
Hello question could we not pipeline glaciar water to drought condit6ions south of northern Alberta slow down rising sea levels before it hits the oceans just asking would proubley help forest fire as well
Earth will be like a tatoin in starwars in 2500..imagine a planet without a seas..human life become only millions in numbers..water evaporate fast because of heat..the future is scary...
This is the way science should be used for! For the betterment of humanity and protection of nature.
I agree.
its utter bullshit and you have been conned.
@@oojimmyflipok bumpkin
Only if humans change it will be or the betterment of humanity and protection of nature, If we change and change in a Big way!!
We need to increase the amount of land covered by forests and jungles drastically. They're our best defense against rising temperatures. We're too distracted by technology when nature has so much to offer us at a fraction of the cost and it maintains itself. Better that than the alternative.
Pity that the exact opposite is happening worldwide.
@@Barbarra63297 agreed. We need those forests back, they're so crucial for our continued survival.
The deforestation makes since a 100 years, in average each 10 years an area half the size of India. That’s the cause of rising CO₂ levels, 280ppm to 420ppm since 1960. However, 540 million years ago, during the Cambrian, CO₂ levels were over 8000ppm, 20 times more as currently. No hot house earth, no boiling planet. That are measures, not models, having zero prediction value but can be tweaked suiting perfectly the political narrative.
Besides, below 200ppm, the flora starts to die, below 180ppm means end of all life as we know it on the surface on the planet. The survivors the micro biospheres surrounding the black smokers, 4 km deep submerged in the midst of the Atlantic Ocean.
It basically means a drastic reduction in much of general modern consumption, private motoring and global travelling, to name a few. Current commercialism together with human population growth and expansion is simply not viable, as the global average annual sustainable resource use now reaches the limit even before August. However, a minority of humans spend their share long before that, but still this profit based industry is supposed to grow. It's quite a mystery only how to make all the deniers/big consumers realise actuality.
You mention the importance of trees but yet we are cutting down old growth trees like they are worth nothing to the us .
The one thing you dont hear is that it is greenery that absorbs the carbon, and as a race we have chopped down more trees than at any other time in history because its easy to do.
Nobody has said tbat for every tree you chop down you replace it with two of the same kind because trees asorb different amounts, so can take more than others.
The other thing is the use of plastic which even today is still on the rise despite knowing that its not only
Harmfull to all other life but also to us, and plus we are not very good at cleaning up after ourselves.
Ok.........20 000 years ago.
Were you THERE!!!!!??????
Hello I'm 65 about 40 years ago I worked for ept building a delta v power line in Queensland between Rockhampton and nebo, one day we came up on the Connors river roadhouse in the crystal highway, the petrol pumps had been torn out of the concrete along with the roof over them right up to the roadhouse itself, it was like surgery not a window was smashed , the roadhouse owner and his wife verified it was the wind, we could not even speak it was frightening to look at the detail of destruction was like an artist's work . The atmosphere speaks like that
Great show. I'm Canadian and we bought a pipeline that won't pay for itself for another 50 years...As one of the presenters in the documentary said, we can continue to do nothing but we are digging ourselves a much deeper hole to climb out of, and that has proved to be the truth. We will continue to do nothing substantial and we will leave a world much, much more different than the one we currently inhabit to our children and this is also a fact. The world will go on, the question really is will we?
Of all the lies we must deal with, Deliberate Omissions, are the most dangerous.
Google search 2023 homeless in Canada. No new data for a decade?!!!
. *How is that even possible?*
"In Statistics Canada's 2023 review of Canadian homelessness data, the latest estimate they provide is from 2014. That estimate says 235,000 people experience “the many different types of homelessness” every year, according to the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, a research organization."
I like Pierre, but... What do you think stops Poilievre from challenging Finance Minister Freeland in Parliament for holding a chair at the World Ecinomic Forum board of directors table in Geneva since 2019? The fact that that fact has never been reported in the Canadian Press for 5 years, should disturb all of us.
Is PM Harper just as dedicated to the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset Agenda success as PM Trudeau and Finance Minister Freeland? The fact that he was at Davos in 2024 with Chrystia Freeland is compelling evidence that he is. Because of PM Harper, and deliberate Press failures to report the facts to the public, Canada is economically weaker than we think.
Did you know that PM Harper sold off 100% of Canada's Gold Reserves at bottom of the market values? Did you know that Canada is the only G-20 country in the World to hold ZERO Gold reserves today? 100% true. The fact that that fact is never mentioned in Parliament, and (almost) never reported in the Canadian Press, should disturb all of us.
Quebec though generates 95% of electricity via hydrogen. The right person leading matters
@@mujkocka Quebec is not powered by 95% hydrogen. And even if it was Hydrogen is just as bad at the moment, if not worse, for mitigation than the continual use of fossil fuels. It takes massive amounts of energy to produce, transport and store. And even when it is used H2O is the byproduct which is another greenhouse gas. Hydrogen is greenwashing.
@@Ominousheat you hav misinterpreted my comment. 95% hydro. i.e. electricity created using DAMs. not hydrogen
@1:24:00 Some parts of Arctic has already warmed by 5C (Barents sea) or even 7C (near sea ice, Svalbard). So these "predicted" temperature changes are partially here already.
Not sure that I agree with it all, as for the wind turbines, only to give one example, which we know they are not zero carbon emission since their production is very costly: ecologically low-effective... I believe you will understand why. However, for most of the rest of the program, I have to say that I was amazed by the quality of the researches and the narration, which I found really compelling!
yeah there ids a reason they only talk about the last 800k years lol cause if they git back longer it thows all their numbers out
Do not worry you will sink with all of us.
@@the_piper001 it is convenient for them; i wonder where has the ice before 800k years ago went. If we truly want to know the bigger picture, that has to be discussed. 800k years sounds a long time ago, but humans were already around on Earth by then.
On the flip side, I am convinced that the rise in CO2 levels are caused by humans burning stuff, as explained around 34:40
@@10kmilesy i work in green houses and we add co2 to nearly all of them, long story short more co2 means better faster and bigger yields in all fruiting plants.
adding co2 is not new and is done all over the world so yes we are doing it for sure 100% lol they even now have co2 kits for home gardeners "mainly the wacky tobacy".
right now outside is just over 400ppm of co2 we go as high as 1200.
The farmer and his simple yet so effective way he harvests his field....I like this alot. Must save in so much waste too. Green light here 👌
NOOOOOOOO
Look, the weather is controlled, manipulated and modified, it all started way back in 1946, the Americans actually said by 2021 we will control the weather.
Co2 is too low at present, it is around 400ppm, it needs to be at 1000ppm to make plants flourish.
Look - you're not a scientist.
No. That's BS. A study was done to debunk that myth. Look it up.
Get some PBS in your life.
If you are a brainwashed fool
PBS Peasants Brainwashing Bullshit
Prove Oil is a fossil fuel
Better tell all the 50 countries to stop geo engineering and stop blaming it on the masses
None are.
@Element-oe8hn do your research buddy
That is really a very interesting subject. I moved from Sweden to Thailand almost two years ago and the clouds here never look like the clouds do in Sweden. So I weren't sure if Sweden was doing it until I moved here and couldn't see any straight line clouds anymore.
@SethEques Looks like they didn't like my reply comment as its been removed! :)
@@scottbaileyExplores Nah, it seems to be a sensitive subject all over the world. No one is openly admitting anything about it.
Norfolk has a history of flooding, there have been less typhoons and extreme weather patterns in recent years, and the polar icecaps are following their normal cycle of variation, like they have been since polar bears were invented.
Is the United Nations a criminal organisation? Just wondering.
This documentary is so true..Thanks for the great effort PBS America, every government must do more not only in talking and paperwork, and they must exert more substantial effort in protecting our planet, The Government must show the initiative and action to show as an example so that each citizen of a nation will see they are really committed to fulfill this important endeavor for our own future...but sad to say they did a lot of talking and tons of paperwork with a bit, tiny bit of action.
Ever wondered why mountainous areas are cooler than industrial lowlands despite the fact it's more closer to the sun.
That's not so strange, planes are flying at 10.000 feet and it's really freezing there around minus 45degr. Celsius.
Bravo NOVA!
We need to act NOW!!!!
yea co² making the planet greener
Climate is very very complex and involves several scientific disciplines, so how can there be any real Climate Scientist? Only self proclaimed ones ?
Because it based on understood scientific principles using fairly accurate data to make predictions and, to explain extreme weather events or climate trends..
"most people sense change in weather"
Meanwhile, our winter which usually starts at December is now starting from January 20th while the December was warm
I've noticed seasons being later and later. Used to always have snow before Halloween and for sure deep snow by Halloween, now it's December/January before any snow adds up
❤
@@MatthewBandstra-kt7yj If you changed location. Say to another state or to another elevation the weather can be very different to what you had at the previouse location. 500 miles can be a vast difference. It is very usual for there to be be variations from year to year with never an exact replication. This year here in England we seemed to have a mild December but a colder November. I tend to find than many many people are shocked at how their supposed summer never happened. As if it was over with in a blink of an eye. That suprises me or used to suprise me. But as a person who monitors tempretures and really feel the heat. I am usually aware that summer had been happening for the usualy length of time. They seem to be looking for the precise same peaks and if they do not happen they seem to miss the fact that for the usuall three months we have had long sunny days. I usually say that a person has to go out and experience it when it is happening. Otherwise it is easy to miss it whilst sat in an air conditioned room. You could easily miss a whole summer living in a new City with High Rise buildings casting penumbric hadows.
@@MatthewBandstra-kt7yj Exactly what the Holy Bible tells us, summers will be winters and winters will become sommers.
If we could just stop the wars, we would do much better . Taking care of our Oceans and Forests are the most important things we can do as humans who care about this Planet! ♥️ There needs to be co - operation not Confrontation !!
Sea level rise is estimated to be 12-20 meters at 2C warming by 2300 (State of cryosphere). Or 10-20 meters with current ghg's. (IPCC).
This brings huge threats to all who live by the sea or near sea level in inlands.
But this is only one threat that comes by the rapidly warming climate.
Current warming trend is toward 3.5C. We can only stop making the situation ever worse.
We need to stop burning fossil fuels. Today.
You're absolutely right. Man creates this priblem. He has the solution BUT, he wants to remain the PROBLEM. Tnk you so much for all your effort.
Any roofs of new construction should be finished white ,trees must be planted ,gardens must be grown instead of grass to feed the poor because poor people can pollute more. Tidal power is the greenest because it works all the time and not many use it. Heat is the big issue and we must use lighter colours for our surfaces to reflect the heat. Using energy from dead plant life is renewable untilized by gasification. Alge blooms need to be harvested and utilized for biodiesel production. The land fills can be turned into energy through gasification plants to run carbon capture plants. Lots we can do if we have less governmental corruption stealing tax payers money.
Should we just rely on people to guide themselves?
We already know how that works!
Brilliant stuff! I love science and nature, but I always had the sense that people who love the planet seem to hate other people. There are extreemists in all fields, but thoughtfull content like this will bring good resource management to the mainstream.
You want to try living in nature it couldnt give a fuck. You can love nature but it won't love you back there has to be a ballance between the two
I don't hate other people, I don't hate humanity, I have immense compassion for everybody around me. But humanity is crushingly, appallingly stupid, we're ruining our ability to live, we're doing it to ourselves knowingly, and I cannot abide such senseless foolishness.
I love humanity, but I hate our foolish, greedy, shortsighted stupidity.
We're about to get what's coming to us.
I only hate people that denies facts, don't want to change to protect the ecosystems and don't respect animal welfare and nature.
Hate other people? Are you a 3 yr old child with no reasoning ability?
Sensers are like a box of chocolates, you never know what your going to get.
Right-wingers must hate this show due to its reliance on things like facts and science.
That’s a pretty bigoted statement
lol and here we are adding co2 to all our green houses lol you hate us famers. we have burners running just to keep the co2 way up .
fun fact you drop the co2 by just 20 ppm and you see with your eye and drop off in yeild in most fruiting plants
You really think there are no left-wing conspiracy theorists? Politics and science are substantially acorrelational.
@@Element-oe8hn yep that is whyn the left always cenor and delete comments cause akll the have is lies
i love the co2 we spent a lot of money on system to make co2 to add to our green house, we famers love the co2
This situation describes the gradual rising of land elevations as it springs back after thousands of years of being crushed under the weight of continental glaciers. The west coast of Hudson Bay is known as one of the more dramatic areas of isostatic rebound where the land still rises at a rate of a metre per century
Now that we have a theory about changing the climate through trapped carbon release, we fly all over the world to attend conferences on climate change, we ship goods all over the world by sea and air, we have been burning gases, byproduct of petroleum extraction, to keep the lights on at night generating light pollution, we maintain a naval fleet constantly on the go consuming oil, we start wars to sell weapons and detonante bombs as a business, meanwhile we cry wolf regarding climate change...
Neurosis any one...
Maybe Let's Face It..? "We're Fucked & Doomed 2 Extinction"
1) it's not a "theory"
2) did you want the scientists to keep it secret? Why? 😅
@1:13:00 Even higher national security risk than rising sea level becomes from rising toll on climate events that drives nations in the wars for vanishing resources. Vanishing mountain glaciers and rivers will bring major threats to global security. Already we can see nations nearing the war on water in Egypt, Gulf nations and so on. This will only worsen due to coming warming with extreme heatwaves, droughts, wildfires and floods.
Also military emissions are not going down, because the equipments that they use are not done with greener technologies. Current global spending spree on militaries will make sure that future emissions remains at high levels for decades to come.
Military emissions are not even measured due to "national security reasons". But that is a FALSE statement, because greater national threat is the climate change.
These feelgood optimistic endings to these programs has helped get us into this mess. Tech is not going to sprinkle pixy dust and stop this locomotive that has so much inertia. We need to be afraid of how far we have let this go, very afraid, and scared into evasive action globally.
Given the state the planet's in, it's amazing we still get shows like this, that is still pretty much asking is "is there climate change or not."!
They’re not asking. It’s just being presented that way for the purposes of telling a story so more people will (hopefully) get it. The stance is clear from the start.
The way I understand it , is that the increase in vegetative sequestration as CO2 concentration rises is likely to be much lower than the number mentioned. There is more to it than just tree mass. There is soil carbon retention and the changes in water and nuitrient availability as completion for these components increases with the demand to increase tree mass. And macro environmental effects like draught and temperature and salination and the change from forest to Savanah are also negative feed back effects to the absolute volume of fossill fuel emissions that the vegetation can absorb. There is still more bad news to come on this as research and models catch up. Trees are part of the preindustrial carbon cycle equilibrium. Planting trees, or even expecting existing trees to sequestrate more can never be the reason to keep burning fossil fuels. Emissions trading schemes have done enormous damage by pretending there is carbon equivalence of tree and fossil fuels.
Had they filmed during the winter it would've been pitch dark - and dead cold...
You should never mess around with nature
Not a fluke at all...concreting fields, building houses on floodplains and big expensive houses in fire prone mountains like california is why the weather is causing more trouble than before, overpopulation, 2 hundred years ago ,these same events would have caused little or no damage to people as there was no one there, there i said it
Very nice documentary.
Hemp is one great way to help in so many ways.
Planet X is affecting the weather on every planet in the solar system
It’s not so much distrust of government but science denial. Many people are not adherents to evidence based thinking. They believe in concepts implicitly without citing any evidence to support their perspective often in the face of very substantial evidence that points the other way. Evidence-based thinking needs to be better represented in the school system (the resistance to teaching young people about natural selection and evolutionary biology is a good example - there is no need in science to provide counter theories unless based on demonstrable evidence). Climate science should be looked upon with an open mind. Of course scepticism is part of the process of finding credible solutions to important questions but it needs to be rational
Last 40 years has shown that we are not "clever enough" to climb out of the climate emergency that we have created. Emission has been only ever rising since scientists have alarmed everyone. 28 COP's and onyl worst emitters are allowed to make this body to increase their profits.
Coutries hits in last months by major extreme climate events:
Saudi-Arabia
UAE
Oman
Brazil
Kenya
Tanzania
New Zealand
Bangladesh
Spain
Portugal
...
Coming hurricane season will be wild. More than alphabetical number of named tropical storms and 2-8 major hurricanes are shown by the models.
Our food production is under major threat, because the harvest season is becoming unpredictable and swings are reaching 20C making normal conditions to freezing ones (ie. Finland). Also many areas are under heatwaves, droughts and floods. We are losing coral reefs (4th global bleaching event, NOAA) while also losing dolphins and seaweeds (ie. Spain). We are already seeing changes in food security and amount of the people under hunger (UN).
It is time to stop burning fossil fuels. Stop making situation ever worse.
Soon as I'm up and running I'm coming to help out I'm almost there with my project to create a great deal of wealth just lacking actual cash lol but i will manage eventually to help.out our world ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Thanks, it is more important
Yr.no Greenland 14/4/2024: -30° C
Antarctica: -54° C
Bravo Dave Legvold.!
HARRP?
Is there a reason the acidification of the ocean was not mentioned? Was that corn field that does not till the soil a GMO crop? There must be a change in carbon absorption for farmers using chemicals in their operations? I did not see any reference to this aspect either, but both highly problematic.
yeah nah we're not allowed to talk about the ill effects of GMO, geoengineering or known forever chemicals literally everywhere even our own bodies.
So you have NO clue that WATER is Ph 8,1.. Ignorance buys every lie
Amazing, almost perfect.
We will immediately link to our product's homepage.
This is a product page aimed at reducing the amount of air conditioners used, which was recently posted on the Japanese Ministry of the Environment, so please allow this as the purpose is the same.
However, the perception is that the situation is about 20 years worse than the simulation from 40 years ago, so I think there is still some oversight.
One is the phenomenon that a Japanese university proved last year that as the ocean temperature rises, it emits CO2.
Another thing that comes to mind is that when CFCs were abolished, they were replaced with CFCs that added carbon, making the gas dozens of times more effective at warming the planet, and cooling efficiency also declined, resulting in more CO2 being emitted than before. Isn't it related?
I agree with the complete abolition of CFCs used in spray cans, but I think it was a mistake to remove the CFCs from car air conditioners and replace them with alternative CFCs, and there is a possibility that a lot of CFCs were released.
And there's something I've been concerned about lately.
Is it really eco-friendly to charge EVs, which emit a lot of CO2 during manufacturing, at night when there is no solar power and then drive them during the day?
If the number increases further, I think the correct answer up until now will become incorrect.
This may still be true in the United States, where nuclear power generation is in operation, but depending on the state, CO2 emissions may be increasing due to charging at night.
Now we need to think carefully.
😊😅😅😂
🎉🎉😊😊😅😊😊😂😅😅😂😅😂😅😊😂🎉
Your reference to CFC's is just a distracting irrelevance.
PBS be dropping dimes in back to back week!!! Whose cooking this content? 😂
What an entertaining and thorough review!! You had me nailed to the screen, Thanks a bunch for sharing!
“…whether something similar in the atmosphere was doing the same thing…” is redundant. Corrected: ‘…something in the atmosphere was doing the same thing…’
But the c02 is hevvy that ossigen,how got tote air?
Dr. Milankovic And Stevacevic said everything a long time ago why this happening with Klima
Hate to be simplistic but could we just not cover non farmable land with trees its sustainable renewable and a source of building material. If you do a quick calculation if the rain forests hadn't been touched we wouldn't be in the mess were in now. And trees are cheep compared to the other ideas been knocked around.
Bro I hate school this is home work now😭🙏
What's the chances of the climate changing in way totally unexpected way...mini ice age, dont rule it out.
We had a mini ice-age for 500 years. It ended 1850, roughly.
Its not you its not CO2 its the sun David Dubyne adapt 2030 channel
The CO2 & CH2 are past previous peaks now and still claiming. In the past, it peaked and then dropped quickly as shown throughout the show. All things being equal and applying the "Basic Physics", the proverbial pendulum swing will be equally drastic and "planet changing".
Very well done and informative
The earth is shifting from tectonic plates earthquakes removal of plant life. Heat from cars factories houses highrises changing wind directions etc.
@123.00 climate model inputs are sorely incomplete to be anywhere near accurate. They nowhere near predicted the temperatures of 2023, the hottest year on record.
Figures please for the %’s CO2, water Vapor and methane? How do con trails increase water Vapor %’s and cloud cover?
It did come with a manual it's called the BIBLE
Adaptation is simply not enough.
Without stopping emissions, specially burning fossil fuels, there is no planet where we can survive. 7C teperature rise or over by 2100. Most of the farming due to lack of stable climate will become impossible. And that is the downfall of the civilization and will bring us neat extinction. Human extinction scenarios begins at 3C upwards.
Try to adapt the coastal cities to predicted 12-20 meters of sea level rise (or much more, because this is for only 2C warming).
When situation goes really bad, we will have billions of refugees and many wars will start. We can only hope they won't be nuclear wars.
Only real alternative:
Stop burning fossil fuels. Today.
What will negatively impact the UK most in the next 20yrs, climate change or uncontrolled immigration?
Just out of curiosity 9:30
It is mentioned that addressing the issue will be "enormously expensive".
So how expensive is human survival?
Because i can go ask the Bank for a loan or borrow them!
I wouldn't want to be the only human that can afford their survival... :P
😅😅
Its natural boys and ginks😊
It will be interesting to see this science intersect with AI advancements
❤?? Il gas inpulsa energia elettrica che se convierte in piccola particella che diventa carbone ciò passaggio del magma gas carbone bombe 🌑🥶
wow,,its the seasons....
Did you stop seeing when you got there, that it is the seasons that decide?
Thank you so much for an out of context quote. Quite meaningless.
The greed of the elite will be the downfall of humanity
Music go bang bang for no reason 😂
Have these scientists ever thought of the Great Flood (?) when our Creator and Living God destroyed the complete earth because of the evil of mankind that time? And rescued Noah, his wife and his 3 sons with their wives and a lot of animals in the Arch ??? That's why they found shells and organisms in the earth.!!!
there are only three countries that us Imperial measurements (feet inches fahrenheit) they are USA and two banana republics why don't you realise this when you make a video for a global audience
There's one country cant spell use. What drives me mad is the countries that use half and half, example the United Kingdom. Wind and road speed MPH imperial, weights, volumes and (lengths as in lengths you buy) metric and of course plumbing just has to be imperial. So you ask for two meters of three and quarter inch copper pipe. Mind you here in Ireland plumbing isn't any batter.
I am Joseph Bigsky l from frog lake Alberta in Canada 😊😅
Is the fog okay.
Hottest xyz on record. Maybe we should check in on the data points of these records. Copernicus I believe is the organisation providing this data. When do these records start? Oh they changed that. Yeah didn't hear much about it. Starting all the way back in 1979. No not a typo, not 1879, but 1979. Hmm
I've seen several climate change graphs where data conveniently leaves out earlier that that would make the graph less dramatic. Let's face it, it is big business now.
@@Project2013B ain't it just. Same games just played on repeat
Considering in late 1970s to early 1980s, there were record snow accumulation. (Ontario Canada). In 2021 a WW1 bunker was discovered when "climate change" melted the glacier on a mountain (Scorluzzo). For the cave to be accessible in WW1, the ice could not have been there, and came after. Also consider the "Dust Bowl" in the 1930's, the area was not developed back then. If Global warming is in total from fossil fuels, how does that explain Glaciation Periods where the world's temperature changes every 100,000 years or so by at least 10°C (18°F). Some studies have it at 15°C (27°F). Now ask what would you like to face, (highest estimate) average temperature of 21°C (37°F) (Iowa summer 43°C (110°F))., or a mile of Ice covering 35% Iowa. North of Iowa would be 3 miles of ice.
Why not try redirecting the warm water flow away from the extreme North and likewise the southpole too , We do direct huge volumes of water to our desires now. Plus they put white sheets on glaceurs ,why not start anyway?
Best climate documentary i've watched so far.
(It's a bit lengthy, just break it up into like, 4 half hour episodes maybe?) 👍
Lmik😊imi0pp
As long as the banks and the insurance companies give out long term loan's and insurances to beach properties I don't believe in this. When they stop I'll buy one 😂
You’re misinformed.
@@kellywinston5811 So the prices of beach properties are plummeting because people can't get loans or insurance on them anymore? Guess I'm in the buyers market then 😂
Hi, I kind of agree with you, but in many cases like bushfrires and floods they don't cover anymore, or exorbant annual premiums.
Actually, did you see that 25M beachfront mansion ready to collapse?
If you haven't, let me know and i will try to find it.
Cheers!
👍
they normally broke before they realise things like that happening :D they not have Crystal balls or anything more than ordinary people, more than estatistical risk data and math based on the past. they may be even more missinformed than you or me. you are giving bank and insurance companys more powers than they have. they only profit and bet with the past risk data in their favor. and even this way, they already are asking for more money for flooding in advance of past data, expecially in coast areas., when it start to flood evidently more they will wont give insurance for flood on beach areas anymore.
They can't predict weather a month from now, but we believe they can predict the weather 10 years from now??
They're working on predicting the climate of the future by using historic data. Predicting the weather for the next few days into the future is a different thing.
@@GloryDaze73 Nice try. 1000s of weather reporting stations, 100s of satellites, and you are trying to tell me it's easier to predict weather/climate over the long term not using any of these modern tools? PS: still waiting for the polar ice caps to melt like they predicted in 2012.... or polar bears to go extinct (eventhough their population is HIGHER than it was in 2012). But hey, 98% of GOVERNMENT FUNDED Scientists agree....
Choose one... will humans die de-hydrati g, or.... drowning....
Come to europe, we have no "global" warming. So where is it?
Build loads of cheap boat drones with a fan and pump to circle the Arctic and use the sea water to pump the water to the fans and make snow and as they are so cheap to make send thousands every month
How ironic that the internet is an Energy Monster that is 'anti-climate'
In the atmosphere, water vapour varies from 0-4% while carbon dioxide varies from 0.038-0.043% at any given moment in time ... has anyone been doing the OBVIOUS science of tracking the H2O molecule? ... instead we pull our hair out regarding the CO2 molecule. H2O is periodically100 times more plentiful and it's power to alter the temperature is 1000s of times more powerful. Now, how, as a dumbfk (like me) say that? 'cause I live in the real world, OUTSIDE ... how much does the (radiant) heat go up on your skin when the sun comes out from behind a (H2O) cloud? ... milliseconds. Just how much CO2 would be required to do that? well SCIENCE says that it's not a straight line effect, it's an exponential curve ... not the way you're think though, we are approaching the flat section where you add a whole shtload of CO2 and nothing detectable happens to the temperature.
Do the science ... with the number of satellites in the sky now we should be able to classify H2O percentages globally at any moment in time, why is nobody doing the science on H2O and temperature?
Ever notice what happens when you by a (let's say) a Volkswagen ... suddenly, wherever you look you see Volkswagens. Perhaps obsessing on CO2 just allows you to invent more places to see CO2 and IGNORE the obvious ... what do you think? not even possible? SHAME on you.
Sure wish this documentary was not so over-the-top biased against science in it's true form while purporting/insinuating to be the exact opposite. Do you know why working horses on the farm had bridals with blinders on the sides? ... they were there so the horses concentrated on the work at hand ... straight ahead. That is what this video is all about, to encourage you to keep YOU "looking straight ahead" and miss EVERYTHING else around you.
If we (humans) were less arrogant ... thinking that we HAVE to be a force of nature, perhaps we would admit that we STILL don't know ANYTHING.
My advice: TAKE OFF YOUR BLINDERS or you will be so far down the rabbit hole that you'll be useless to the species.
what i find funny is no one talks about food, in our green house any of them that we do not up the co2 in we have a 100% air exchange rate as if the co2 drops even 20 ppm we start to see a drop offs in things yeild.
For h2o contribution. ..just open an ipcc report. ..
I agree with everything you say. Everything in this video has been debunked for decades but the truth doesn’t make the elites the money and give them control over us as Climate Crisis propaganda does!
Exactly. This is like watching a Hollywood movie just drama with no science. The more CO2 they stop the less food we will have. Everything in this video is not science, it is carefully prepared propaganda to push the global agenda because without it their narrative would fall flat in its face.
Can't put a carbon tax on water vapour
Climate Change is real and I understand ports like Port of Vancouver are being hammered by Climate Change, including atmospheric rivers. America's farmers and producers may want to redirect exports through Duluth, the Great Lakes and the Seaway. If independent investigation confirms Rome's grain port, portus, is now and always was, about 40 meters higher than current sea levels, then America's farmers and producers may want to export through Duluth, the Great Lakes and the Seaway which are much higher than current and future sea levels. You'll need independent experts in order to attract investors and infrastructure.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Funny as bruv,and I suppose fairy's are real as well 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
It is too late in 2024, good luck with thinking a way out of this with your university degrees and technology.
I cant stop thinking someone is going to have egg on their face when the upcoming cooling happens.
What if all the money that is now put on wars and unemployment were put on actions to increase forests and and other means to adverse the direction of destiny?????? Ex: pick up te Sundays and convert it electricity and convert that to hydrogen and run cars and industry with hydrogen, this way we keep atmosphere clean and do not use so much fossil fuels. etc. etc. etc.
And put our scientists to think of even more methods to advance new methods.
As 180 ppm CO2 brings death, AND 400 ppm is current state of affairs, AND farmers put ca 1600 ppm into greenhouses it is evident that we need more co2 --- NOT less. Witness Jurassic time had even 9000vppm CO2. THEN Sahara and other deserts could become green rainforests like The Amazon. As all deserts would become green rainforests the sun's power to heat would be less as it would shine on green vegetation not on bare sand.
What we are missing is an giganting air conditioner and the deserts could be the Missing Links. he problem is that the needed co2 is on the water of the oceans water. How to take it to air conditioner use is the get the water to the surface and it would by itself turn to gas form of co2. We would need gigantic pipelines to get enough water up to the surface of the seas, by pumping air into the pipes the bubbles would get th water moving to the surface.
With Complimets. Ole Lindell
the life expectancy of the future generation si rapidly decrease
Bir gram bile dinlenilecek gibi değil. Teknoloji övücülüğü ile başladı.
Climate change is both natural and man made, you have to accept both, by not accepting both you have the other side not listen. Currently man made climate change is out pacing natural change, but both are at play.
Carbon capture and carbon removal is a pipedream.
To say we can adapt as an option is laughable.
ive watched over 30 climate change videos, and for some reason not 1 has mentioned geoengineering, extremely odd i must say
Hello question could we not pipeline glaciar water to drought condit6ions south of northern Alberta slow down rising sea levels before it hits the oceans just asking would proubley help forest fire as well
we have bunners running to up our co2 as 400 ppm is just a little low to grow in green house
Earth will be like a tatoin in starwars in 2500..imagine a planet without a seas..human life become only millions in numbers..water evaporate fast because of heat..the future is scary...
Real window into the past is not for you to see