29:00 this combo of 10s is nice to bet with with cause… it blocks the j10s and Ace highs in villains range he could bluff river with? With the other combo of 10s ur better off checking cause u can pick off bluffs more with them? Am I thinking this through correctly. Jw
29:00 so u don’t want to bet as often of A♠️ cause A9 and AQ of♠️ are hands u want to target if u shove Ace high. Those are supposed to fold to a jam. It does make ur head hurt thinking why the server like certain combos.
this is not true at all (i would agree few yrs back). what seperates amateur and pros are their ability to get into juicy game. you can analyze all you want, but if you play with a bunch of TAG and nit, best of luck to your income even you are phil ivey
@@stanime3065luck doesn’t change if you’re a bad player or a good player. Luck only changes who thinks you’re a good player (and how much money you make)
With the first hand where he had qt in early position vs the sb, I thought he should bet around 63% because he might not have the range advantage but should have the nut advantage… and from watching upswing videos I’ve learned that as your bet frequency decreases your bet amount needs to increase… so since this is a board texture which will usually favour the blinds more than someone in early position (granted this is slightly different because he was a straddle and therefore acts as a blind), you want to bet a small range of hands with a bigger bet amount. Glad to see the upswing vids paying off.
great poker content, your videos are getting me back into the game. This still doesn't excuse you for picking Lost Temple against me in Orc vs UD, not cool Doug
I went to get some groceries and my card was declined... I was like wtf, so I called my bank. They informed me that my account was empty. You can imagine my surprise... I had like 200k in there... I owe you a punch in the face sir 😂😂😂😂❤❤
DP-wuts the haps? This may not be that current vid, however, super lay down vs PHelmuth. He is a pro & wundakinda from way back but DanielN, PIvey, TonyG, PAntonious & just a plethora of otha pros just continue to beat Philly like a circus monkey, to the point of full tilt. I know it's televised & select tourneys may b in play to maximize product, industry, ratings & to develop audience connections w specific player. I feel that the better players abuse him & find it relatively easy to beat him on so many levels. Good Luck- Eric NYC
#1 - first of all you never play at these stakes and won't #2 - you're nopt a winning player so your opinion or advice means absolutely zero here #3 - as said above being you have zero expereince/credibility/or success you have zero place criticizing anyone's play #4 - you come here to tell one of the top poker players in the world that your proceeses work better than their's - you're clearly both oblivious as well as extremely arrogant #5 - your post is also highly passive-aggressive Maybe shut-up, listen, and learn versus go around rpetending like you're an expert and others should listen to you despite your obvious inexperience
I had the exact same analysis as you in the 1010 hand verbatim. Like, spooky levels of verbatim to hear my exact thoughts be verbalized for 15 minutes or whatever - my best game was also HUNL so perhaps that's why. I loved the idea of jamming 1010 there. I'd also probably jam AA blocking a lot of airballs and A8 but unblocking all worse pocket pairs that can hero call, as well as Q, but that would be likely the bottom of my value range for that size.
Well the TT hand where Doug says he shouldve jammed w that particular combo, he never says WHY that combo. 2 bdfd blockers means your villian has what? Don't get why. Also Dougs bluffing freq is pretty high and people know this so I doubt better is folding. Even if he jams pairs higher than TT are calling vs Doug. I don't like the bet or jam since you're only called if you're beat and higher prs which is a lot of the 4 bet range are calling.
I'm actually not sure why that specific combo either, but also in GTO world it doesn't matter if the better doesn't fold because it means he gets value whenever he isn't bluffing, and in a 4-bet pot Q3 doesn't beat value (and if he never bluffs then Q3 folds everytime)
Oh I should have mentioned. When there are 2 clubs on the turn, his main bluff hands contain a club. That means when he checks back the turn, he has more of his giveups and marginal showdown. Usually when you have the turned suit you have more river bets vs missed turn bet.
The solver's love of the suit spades observed on the big hand with 10s does not lend to any rational explanation and calls into question the solver itself
@@santaclause3487I saw it treating differently, two of the same suited hand (and none of either suit on the board). I think your faith in computer programming is undeserved and there are still bugs to be worked out in these solvers that people treat like gospel. Maybe in a couple more years, you will be right
On the Q83 monotone board with the 6 on the turn how on earth is this not a bet? How can this be too thin? You likely would've raised w sets or often flushes and you didn't. His two pair is often ahead and can get called by hands like yours. Do not understand this at all
just for fun i,d like to see a high stakes game where solvers were allowed , computers don,t take luck into the equation, i think it,d be a blast to watch everyone just play by numbers and get wrecked !
on the 65 vs Q10 i think i check jam with 65 on the river only if i was up against Doug......because i know more then most he bluffs a lot more because of the solver. Also, Alex was way out of line......like after about 30 mins of his shit I would have said enough is enough.
@@synchronium24 no because Doug may think he is jamming as a bluff and might call with marginal untho unlikely you might also get him to fold 88 or so hands
you have no experience playing at these limts nor any credibility so maybe shut up adn learn versus spouting off as though you're an expert in things you know little about
On the AJ vs KQ hand, you show on the screen pio wants to bet AJ most of the time but you state you shouldn't. Huh? Seems like a good hand to bet 4 betting w prd board and backdoors. Not understanding why you wouldn't range bet this. Your saying opposite of what pio is showing and what makes sense imo being the reraiser pre. You're just sooo good at poker? Is that why you're owned in live games most of the time? You made your money being a computer nerd doing what a computer tells you to do online. That works for online..not for the most part playing live vs humans which is why you use mostly live and Daniel owns you live but you can beat him only if it's analyzing computer stats w people probably assisting you. Just because pio says that's ok to check doesn't mean you're just sooo good at poker. By the way, most of the time pio says to bet most AJs here because you can get called by worse like kk qq or JJ or suited aces. While this is interesting you're biggest flaw in all this solver work is you don't node lock to what most villains actually do which changes the outputs dramatically. You are overly aggressive in my opinion so people know to call you wider. Just because a computer program says you should do something it doesn't automatically make it the correct play. It's all player dependant, image dependant, etc as well..ya know poker..not just what a computer program tells you. Honestly while pio you can learn from, most live poker to make the most amount of money should be more exploitative than solver based.
Ohhhh not even the great Doug Polk has memorized and executes every single solver range and scenario, and loses $$ when he don't cooler the opponent wow ain't that sumthin'. Buy the End Boss System where you learn to call with trash hands like the owner. wow
What separates the pros from the amateurs is enjoying endless solver analysis 💤 You do realize half of us are watching this on our phone and can’t read this stuff right? I love you Doug, but you’re losing me man. Constructive feedback: if you did the analysis offline, and just explained it to me verbally I’d get more out of it. I don’t need 90% of the screen filled up with stuff I can’t really see; and when you’re involved in it and referencing it, you’re in one place and now I’m totally lost. Just one person’s perspective
Развлечения
I was watching and was hoping wed get a breakdown on some hands. Thanks doug
Amazing analysis! Thank you for providing the free coaching!
Great stuff Doug. Thanks for the free coaching
thank you doug for another education takeaway it helps a lot for the viewers
This is amazing content
appreciate the content doug
"Here's where I made OUR first mistake today" Hey buddy.. leave us out of this it's all on you 😅
He didn't lose $200k. We lost $200k. Everyone has to pony up...
25:56 so the river bet was a bluff and not a value bet. There you go Alex. Good on you for breaking it down
27:00is a good point about going small with 4 straight spots. Heads up ranges so wide, so go smaller.
Finding the bluff with TT is really impressive. Alot of high stakes crusher would'nt typically find that bluff.
"23:02" brilliant take a bow, Doug did take on a CPU! HumanLand hilarious
I just love this title with this thumbnail 😂
I like the technical stuff!
It’s amazing that he has a poker teaching website
That was amazing. Thank you
great work, too bad I had to fast forward few times while I was waiting for a doc....:( keep up the good work!
Funny title and pic 😂
Please do more videos like this appreciated! 1:00:22 not following why we would 100% bet AJss and not AJcc?
29:00 this combo of 10s is nice to bet with with cause… it blocks the j10s and Ace highs in villains range he could bluff river with? With the other combo of 10s ur better off checking cause u can pick off bluffs more with them? Am I thinking this through correctly. Jw
This was a night where the best strategy was to never play a hand with Alex. Dude could not miss. Is there a setting in the solver for that?
TY so much for your videos !
29:00 so u don’t want to bet as often of A♠️ cause A9 and AQ of♠️ are hands u want to target if u shove Ace high. Those are supposed to fold to a jam.
It does make ur head hurt thinking why the server like certain combos.
my favourite video of yours
What seperares the pros from the amateur is the willingness to learn from failure.
...And luck. So many of the just run hot when they first start to give them to kickstarter they need
Many high stakes amateurs already have f u money and don’t care enough to learn
That is true. Especially in my earlier years I would analyze my losses to a crazy degree. A lot of the time a big lost pot is an opportunity to learn.
this is not true at all (i would agree few yrs back). what seperates amateur and pros are their ability to get into juicy game. you can analyze all you want, but if you play with a bunch of TAG and nit, best of luck to your income even you are phil ivey
@@stanime3065luck doesn’t change if you’re a bad player or a good player. Luck only changes who thinks you’re a good player (and how much money you make)
very very very nice video !!
Yay Polker hands!!!
With the first hand where he had qt in early position vs the sb, I thought he should bet around 63% because he might not have the range advantage but should have the nut advantage… and from watching upswing videos I’ve learned that as your bet frequency decreases your bet amount needs to increase… so since this is a board texture which will usually favour the blinds more than someone in early position (granted this is slightly different because he was a straddle and therefore acts as a blind), you want to bet a small range of hands with a bigger bet amount. Glad to see the upswing vids paying off.
Great video Doug , thank you !
great poker content, your videos are getting me back into the game. This still doesn't excuse you for picking Lost Temple against me in Orc vs UD, not cool Doug
"36:02" speechless
Love it
How did Brettski do in that game???
According to GTO wizard TT are folding most of the time when getting 4betted from UTG2.
I went to get some groceries and my card was declined... I was like wtf, so I called my bank. They informed me that my account was empty. You can imagine my surprise... I had like 200k in there...
I owe you a punch in the face sir 😂😂😂😂❤❤
DP-wuts the haps? This may not be that current vid, however, super lay down vs PHelmuth. He is a pro & wundakinda from way back but DanielN, PIvey, TonyG, PAntonious & just a plethora of otha pros just continue to beat Philly like a circus monkey, to the point of full tilt.
I know it's televised & select tourneys may b in play to maximize product, industry, ratings & to develop audience connections w specific player.
I feel that the better players abuse him & find it relatively easy to beat him on so many levels.
Good Luck-
Eric NYC
I never solve hands from splashy games. I cant see the point. But still love the video. Thanks Doug!
#1 - first of all you never play at these stakes and won't
#2 - you're nopt a winning player so your opinion or advice means absolutely zero here
#3 - as said above being you have zero expereince/credibility/or success you have zero place criticizing anyone's play
#4 - you come here to tell one of the top poker players in the world that your proceeses work better than their's - you're clearly both oblivious as well as extremely arrogant
#5 - your post is also highly passive-aggressive
Maybe shut-up, listen, and learn versus go around rpetending like you're an expert and others should listen to you despite your obvious inexperience
wdym "unblocking some spade hands that can bet flop and check turn"? board had 2 clubs not spades no?
So it WAS a bluff
I had the exact same analysis as you in the 1010 hand verbatim. Like, spooky levels of verbatim to hear my exact thoughts be verbalized for 15 minutes or whatever - my best game was also HUNL so perhaps that's why. I loved the idea of jamming 1010 there. I'd also probably jam AA blocking a lot of airballs and A8 but unblocking all worse pocket pairs that can hero call, as well as Q, but that would be likely the bottom of my value range for that size.
😅
Douche
Well the TT hand where Doug says he shouldve jammed w that particular combo, he never says WHY that combo. 2 bdfd blockers means your villian has what? Don't get why. Also Dougs bluffing freq is pretty high and people know this so I doubt better is folding. Even if he jams pairs higher than TT are calling vs Doug. I don't like the bet or jam since you're only called if you're beat and higher prs which is a lot of the 4 bet range are calling.
I'm actually not sure why that specific combo either, but also in GTO world it doesn't matter if the better doesn't fold because it means he gets value whenever he isn't bluffing, and in a 4-bet pot Q3 doesn't beat value (and if he never bluffs then Q3 folds everytime)
Oh I should have mentioned. When there are 2 clubs on the turn, his main bluff hands contain a club. That means when he checks back the turn, he has more of his giveups and marginal showdown. Usually when you have the turned suit you have more river bets vs missed turn bet.
can you put your stats out like vpip, bluffs that got thru and value bets that got paid ect.
You can have 7 2 off suit with one main factor "LUCK" is on your side so your opponent who is holding aces, is pretty much running dead...
The solver's love of the suit spades observed on the big hand with 10s does not lend to any rational explanation and calls into question the solver itself
It’s always has a reason. It might be the tedious of reasons tho, and a tiny amount of EV difference.
@@santaclause3487I saw it treating differently, two of the same suited hand (and none of either suit on the board). I think your faith in computer programming is undeserved and there are still bugs to be worked out in these solvers that people treat like gospel. Maybe in a couple more years, you will be right
Damn, I was watching Eram & missed this stream! Next time for sure. My bad. ;-)
On the Q83 monotone board with the 6 on the turn how on earth is this not a bet? How can this be too thin? You likely would've raised w sets or often flushes and you didn't. His two pair is often ahead and can get called by hands like yours. Do not understand this at all
Sets and flushes call flop
Flushes and sets aren't 3 betting the flop.
My calculator says you can only beat a bad bluff with red J 10...
Haven't seen Vanessa in a while. Welcome back, Vanessa!
just for fun i,d like to see a high stakes game where solvers were allowed , computers don,t take luck into the equation, i think it,d be a blast to watch everyone just play by numbers and get wrecked !
How’s making the money back you lost this year?
Way too much time spent on 1st hand u have to also think about player type .. he's not putting you on a jack or pp so he played it decent
Excellent video
Any lawyers in here? I didn't sign any contract with Doug and I can't afford to lose $200k together. Please help!
huge fail on thinking you're funny
on the 65 vs Q10 i think i check jam with 65 on the river only if i was up against Doug......because i know more then most he bluffs a lot more because of the solver. Also, Alex was way out of line......like after about 30 mins of his shit I would have said enough is enough.
65s is a made hand on that board, so if he overbluffs, calling is best. Jamming just gets him to fold his bluffs and call with better.
@@synchronium24 no because Doug may think he is jamming as a bluff and might call with marginal untho unlikely you might also get him to fold 88 or so hands
you have no experience playing at these limts nor any credibility so maybe shut up adn learn versus spouting off as though you're an expert in things you know little about
10s just a fold against that huge 4bet. Why would you say its a slam dunk call?
And its not even a 3bet really preflop. Just a call 90% of the time cuz its deep + low rake
you're a nit.
Here’s an idea. Don’t play in tough lineups.
copium.
Is Doug even good at poker?
On the AJ vs KQ hand, you show on the screen pio wants to bet AJ most of the time but you state you shouldn't. Huh? Seems like a good hand to bet 4 betting w prd board and backdoors. Not understanding why you wouldn't range bet this. Your saying opposite of what pio is showing and what makes sense imo being the reraiser pre. You're just sooo good at poker? Is that why you're owned in live games most of the time? You made your money being a computer nerd doing what a computer tells you to do online. That works for online..not for the most part playing live vs humans which is why you use mostly live and Daniel owns you live but you can beat him only if it's analyzing computer stats w people probably assisting you. Just because pio says that's ok to check doesn't mean you're just sooo good at poker. By the way, most of the time pio says to bet most AJs here because you can get called by worse like kk qq or JJ or suited aces. While this is interesting you're biggest flaw in all this solver work is you don't node lock to what most villains actually do which changes the outputs dramatically. You are overly aggressive in my opinion so people know to call you wider. Just because a computer program says you should do something it doesn't automatically make it the correct play. It's all player dependant, image dependant, etc as well..ya know poker..not just what a computer program tells you. Honestly while pio you can learn from, most live poker to make the most amount of money should be more exploitative than solver based.
Doug screwed Daniel so hard that even Daniels fan boys are but hurt, YEARS after the fact.
Noice
Play for 15 years still d0nks
i can't explain it but that titles just pisses me of
Ohhhh not even the great Doug Polk has memorized and executes every single solver range and scenario, and loses $$ when he don't cooler the opponent wow ain't that sumthin'. Buy the End Boss System where you learn to call with trash hands like the owner. wow
This guy bought a course and still loses :(
wow alex is horrible
What separates the pros from the amateurs is enjoying endless solver analysis 💤
You do realize half of us are watching this on our phone and can’t read this stuff right?
I love you Doug, but you’re losing me man. Constructive feedback: if you did the analysis offline, and just explained it to me verbally I’d get more out of it. I don’t need 90% of the screen filled up with stuff I can’t really see; and when you’re involved in it and referencing it, you’re in one place and now I’m totally lost. Just one person’s perspective
i agree,
Why are you watching it? The video was MEANT to be watched on a screen and given your thoughts, not meant to be watched by you at all.
Your phone suxx bad then. Mine is 4 years old and I can read everything clearly.
That sucks. I am sorry. TOO FEW PEOPLE MAKES MONEY IN POKER. Get out!
Imagine Vanessa selbt comment on wsop ME with this detailed style
has Mike postle jailed? He's best live poker player, ever