Herod's Death 4 BC Date Refuted

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @Nivalian
    @Nivalian 10 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks for these videos

  • @ezekielsaltar4728
    @ezekielsaltar4728 2 месяца назад

    Born April 7th, 5 BC and resurrected April 7th, 30 AD, 33 Years.

    • @JustScriptureMinistries
      @JustScriptureMinistries  2 месяца назад

      That's 34 years. 35 subtract that there is no 0 AD makes it 34 exactly with your conjecture of being born and died on April 7th.

    • @ezekielsaltar4728
      @ezekielsaltar4728 2 месяца назад

      @@JustScriptureMinistries Use a "Calculate days between dates" tool. April 7th, 5BC to April 5, 30AD (his death) is 12,416 days which is 33.99 years. The Rabbis like to say that a righteous person is born and dies on the same day, in Jesus' case, he was born and resurrected on the same day, April 7th. Also if you check out His Bar Mitzva on April 7th, 8AD (4383 days/12 years old), it was Passover. April 7th is the 18th day from the Equinox, and the gematria Hebrew word for life (Chai) is 18!

    • @str.77
      @str.77 Месяц назад +1

      @@ezekielsaltar4728 The date of crucifixion is most likely correct. The date of birth is more possible than the one proposed in this video but not only is there nothing like "33.99 years" or translating years into days and back into years - time doesn't work like that - but more importantly is "the Rabbis like to say" not solid evidence for anything. There were quite a lot of righteous ones in Israel's long history and to think that they all were born and died on the same day is absurd.
      Furthermore, this idea is actually the basis for the two competing dates for Christmas. Assuming that Jesus was conceived on the same day he died - which church fathers thought was either March 25th or April 6th - and adding nine months of pregnancy led to December 25th or January 6th, i.e. Christmas Day and Epiphany.

    • @ezekielsaltar4728
      @ezekielsaltar4728 Месяц назад

      @@str.77 Of course it is all conjecture. I arrived on the April 7th date because I was trying to determine the orientation of the Temple. The stipulation is that the Temple was orientated to the sunrise of Passover, but which Passover. I use the Gregorian date to show the day from the Equinox, so the 30 AD date is the right Passover date. The number 18 shows up all over Judaism. Also using the 18th date from the Autumn equinox (Sep 4) yields some very interesting items when aligning this day with Rosh Hoshana. Because of the drift in the Hebrew calendar the last time Tishrei 1 falls on Sep 4th is 2089/5850.

    • @str.77
      @str.77 Месяц назад +1

      @@ezekielsaltar4728 Now that's quite a stretch. I've never heard of such a "stipulation" and even if it were true, which I doubt very much, it would have no connection to any date in Jesus's life.
      30 (or 33) AD is the correct year of Jesus's death because only in these years did Passover fall on a Saturday, with Preparation Day (when the lambs were slaughtered) on a Friday - which is what the Gospel of John says. Passover never fell on a Saturday (which would fit what the Synpotic Gospels imply).
      18 is irrelevant.

  • @lemonobrien
    @lemonobrien 10 месяцев назад

    jesus was born 9/11/03 b.c. 0r 9/1102 b.c. in sterillium

    • @mpaq01
      @mpaq01 9 месяцев назад +1

      He is born on 9/11/-03! In Stellarium they add the year 0, this is why the real date sky of 9/11/-03 appear on 9/11/-02 in Stellarium.

    • @undergroundpublishing
      @undergroundpublishing 6 месяцев назад

      @@mpaq01 Why do you guys say it is on 9/11? Do you realize the the Norman Kingdom was (from which RIchard the Lionhearted and John descend) was founded in 911? Do you have a reference that places the birth of Jsus on this date, or is this an occult thing?

    • @str.77
      @str.77 Месяц назад

      @@undergroundpublishing No Norman KINGDOM was founded in 911.

    • @undergroundpublishing
      @undergroundpublishing Месяц назад

      @@str.77 I misspoke when I said the kingdom started at that point. It was the fomalization of the original Norman colonies in France. Here is the article. The colonies swore fealty to the king of France I think so they wouldn't have been an independent kingdom at the time. But that is the beginning of Normandy from where the Norman Kings descended.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normans?wprov=sfla1

    • @str.77
      @str.77 Месяц назад

      @@undergroundpublishing It was when the Western Frankish king installed the Viking Rollo as Count at the mouth of the Seine, which developed into the Duchy of Normandy. As you now correctly say there never was a king of Normandy nor was the territory ever outside of France.