Real answer. QLED is pretty much LCD made to look closer to OLED in order to mislead potential customers. OLED has better image but is often too dim in bright rooms.
Wrong. Most of the time, the Qled will give a better picture quality over an OLED. Picture quality is a different thing than just having perfect blacks. When OLED were the new tech, they were better. But Qled has come a long way from where it started..
@@JuanDiaz-jo1rwoled actually has the better picture just less brightness like OP said. I’m a professional in the theater world and you’re not correct in what you said. OP is correct.
@xXPhIlIeSXx2010 When I compare the New Qled and the New OLED tvs available. The Qled has the better picture quality. The OLED might give a better RGB color spectrum, as in more accurate colors. But it is not anything that can not be adjusted on a QD-OLED. I'm not saying OLED is trash. I'm saying don't let the tech fool you. Because my eyes can see the QD- Oled picture is better than LGs picture quality at the current moment.
@@kougamecs3876bruh. Why would I want a crt over a qled? I know the response time is better but I can’t imagine it’s worth the sacrifice in image quality
I got a samsung neo qled. Qleds and neo qleds get brighter than oleds so they are better in a bright room and are better for hdr because of the extra brightess
Oled look the best but I don't like the low brightness and the burn in risk. As a gamer I already have burn in on my CX and it made me not want to get an oled for my next tv. Might get a samsung QN90C next.
OLED is just too good, you shouldn't go back to non OLED. OLEDs are getting better and better with burn in being almost a non issue. And brightness is also getting better. If price isnt an issue, definitely go for OLED.
@@nigma195 depends on your budget. The LG C3 is a great option for around 1k. But if you have a larger budget, any of the TVs that came out in 2023 or that will come out in 2024 should be good. Just do a bit of research. But the tech is ever improving.
@@gray_gogy OLED is getting marginally brighter, but mini LED is getting almost on par with black levels while hitting upwards of 2k nits and above nowadays while OLED is barely cracking 1k. The slightly better blooming isn't worth sacrificing that much brightness unless you're strictly watching in a dark room with absolutely no ambient light.
@@hyperactivetendencies7054 on my LG c2 I find myself lowering the brightness. I never have it on max brightness. I only go max brightness when there's a lot of day light in the room with the curtains open. I must admit, I do wish that it were a touch brighter so that I had more brightness in that scenario when there is way too much daylight, but in that case I just have to close the curtains. It's not too bad. But most other times, I never have it on max brightness. So to say that you need a fully dark room with zero ambient light seems like a huge exaggeration in my opinion. In fact, even with the lights on the c2 is too bright at max brightness. To be fair, I haven't used mini led so I can't speak on pros and cons. I don't know the black levels it reaches nor the amount of blooming to say whether or not the brightness boost is worth it. Perhaps it is. Just pointing out that in MOST scenarios the LG C2 is too bright at max brightness
I just bought an LG C4 77 inch OLED. I spent 3 months researching TVs. I'm blown away with the picture quality. No other TV comes close unless its an OLED. OLED tech is perfect image contrast and colour. As well OLED is superior for viewing gaming, movies. Q-LED is bad for your eyes. OLED wins on all factors. Pay more and go for OLED. Wait for a half price sale. It will put the biggest smile on your face.
People care because QLEDs are generally brighter than OLEDs. They kan output a higher peak brightness than OLEDs and MINILEDs with QLED technology go even beyond that. So people should consider it if they watch tv in bright rooms. OLEDs are generally better in dark rooms or less bright rooms and they have incredible viewing angles. People should consider it if they want the most natural colors I would say and don’t have too much (sun)light shining into their rooms and mostly watch TV in the evening. OLEDs are relatively to QLEDs more expensive though.
Both QLED and OLED displays can have glossy finishes. It’s less about the capability of each technology and more about the product design from the manufacturers.
More people of both genders really need to learn about Oled because it's so much better for movies, tv shows, live tv and more also it's more power efficient so not only is it better for viewing you also save money on your power bill!
OLEDs have great contrast and color but are a little compromised on brightness, unless you purchase a QD-OLED or Quantum Dot OLED and both tend to be on the higher end of the price range and can suffer from burn-in. QLEDs also have great color and contrast but, the brightness is really good because these is a grid array of variable intensity LEDS that can put our more light than the individually lit pixels and sub pixels of an OLED. They also tend to be mid range on price. A big downside is something called halo-ing where in scenes with a very bright object in a field of black, can cause this haloing effect where, because there are far more pixels than there are individual backlight LEDs, they (the LEDs) can only match what the pixels are displaying to a certain extent. So there will be some light bleed around objects in that scenario. I have a Samsung QN90A NEO-QLED from 2021 and it is a great display and I barely ever notice the haloing, really only when there is white text on a black background.
I hear about burn ins with oled I’m looking to buy a tv for gaming and watching any tips? Certainly can’t afford have it a burn in I wanna use the tv for years
Was going to get the c3 65 inch but damn it gonna end up trying out a 55 qn85d we have a bright living room even with the blinds closed so it might work out for the better
I have a 4k qled tcl tv. My first 4k tv, and first qled tv. Its more of a budget 4k tv at $500, but wow its amazing. I ordered a qd oled monitor yesterday, itll be my first oled screen apart from a phone. Very excited and i cant wait to compare the colors between the 2
Qd oled is a bit of both, but higher risk of burn in, since that's a new technology and that will take a few years before they figure out a way to find a fix. Was tempted to buy the a95L last year, but some people with the a95K reported burn uns already, whereas regular oled found a fix years ago. Although the risk will always be there for regular oled tvs. The chances of your TV getting burn in, is much much slimmer than older oled tvs and Qd oled tvs. I may get the G4 or wait for the G5
What would happen if you add a backlight behind the oled picels or edge lit an oled? Would it be a brighter OLED? Sort of a hybrid between OLED and QLED.
OLEDs are the one displays that do not benefit from backlighting. If anything it will take away from the contrast it offers. I’d only suggest bias lighting on LED TVs
Samsung and LG are making tandem oled. Which is basically just an OLED display stacked on top of another oled display. It makes the display brighter and I think more color-accurate.
Few people will believe it, my basics I thought that the screens worked like oled, that is, that there are millions of pixels everywhere that can turn on and off, and now I have just discovered that it is in modern times that we use this screen technology
Im thinking of getting a new tv its between the LG C2, Sony a95k and the samsung qn800b. The tv will be used for alot of movie watching and gaming. What’s best and any opinions.
Don’t get the Qn800b get the C there’s a noticeable difference in the picture and also the anti glare technology (to avoid sunlight reflecting on the screen) Honestly the best here is the A95K tho
The Concept of Using Prisms as Pixels in Visual Media Imagine a world where each pixel on a screen is replaced by a small prism, manipulating white light to transform it into the shapes and colors of film. This innovative idea employs the principles of optical prisms, but instead utilizes artificial, miniature prisms that can change the characteristics of light in ways that go beyond traditional pixel displays. Prisms as Pixels Prisms and White Light: Instead of each pixel displaying just one part of a color, envision each prism in the system being able to diffuse white light and convert it into various colors and shapes. As white light passes through a prism, it separates into its fundamental colors (red, blue, green, etc.), creating rich and dynamic images. This transformation could allow for a much more organic representation of visuals, as the prisms would be capable of creating smooth gradients and transitions rather than being confined to discrete units of color like traditional pixels. Artificial Prisms: Instead of glass prisms, we could use artificial materials that incorporate nanoparticle movements. These movements, controlled by a CPU (Central Processing Unit), can vibrate and change the wavelength of the white light passing through them. This enables the fine control and adaptation of the colors emitted by the prisms, creating more complex and precise visual effects. Mechanisms of Action Nanoparticle Movements and Vibrations: Nanoparticle technology can be employed to create flexible materials that respond to electrical impulses. These materials can vibrate at different frequencies, altering how light passes through them. Consequently, the prisms can simulate various colors and shapes in real time, enabling the creation of images that are both dynamic and interactive. Each prism can be adjusted to emit a specific color or shape based on the desired visual output, allowing for an unprecedented level of customization. CPU and Control: The CPU can analyze visual data and determine which colors and shapes should be displayed based on the content being played. For instance, when a scene featuring a blue sky is shown, the CPU can activate specific nanoparticle movements in the prism to create the corresponding shade of blue. This precise control allows for high-quality displays and realism. Advantages of This Technology Elimination of Pixelation: This technology could facilitate the display of images without visible pixelation, resulting in a smoother and more aesthetically pleasing visual experience. Prisms can create seamless transitions between colors, making the overall viewing experience more immersive. Removing the pixel grid could lead to a more organic perception of visuals, reducing the harsh edges and transitions often seen in traditional displays. Reduction of Artifacts: By utilizing prisms instead of pixels, it may be possible to minimize artifacts like the moiré effect or blurring commonly associated with standard screens. Prisms can provide more natural representations of motion and color, enhancing the overall clarity and quality of the visual experience. Interactivity: This technology opens doors to new forms of interaction with visual content. Users could manipulate colors or shapes through physical interactions, creating interactive art pieces and presentations that engage audiences in unique ways. The ability to alter the visual output in real-time could lead to innovative applications in gaming, virtual reality, and live performances. Challenges and Considerations Technical Feasibility: Developing this technology will require advanced materials and engineering. Creating functional artificial prisms that are precise and fast enough for real-time operation presents a significant challenge. Calibration would also be essential to ensure that images remain sharp and accurate despite the variability introduced by light manipulation. Costs: The cost of producing such devices may be high, potentially limiting their availability in the market. Research and development efforts are necessary to reduce costs and improve efficiency. Industry Adaptation: The film and media industry would need to adapt to new techniques of shooting and producing content that take advantage of this technology. This transition would require time and resources, as filmmakers and artists learn to work with new tools and methods. Conclusion The idea of using prisms as replacements for pixels that manipulate white light presents a revolutionary approach to visual media. Employing artificial prisms with nanoparticle movements allows for dynamic, interactive visualization that surpasses the limitations of traditional pixels. This technology holds the potential to create richer, more realistic, and engaging visual experiences, but it requires further research and development to become a reality. If successfully implemented, it could transform the way we experience films and other forms of visual art, offering a future where visual storytelling is not just seen but felt in a profound and interactive way.
They are sales pitch for people to pay more money when IRL u can't tell the difference and the specs don't even matter when ur streaming or playing classic movies
@@Josh-gi3tu the specular highlights will look much better on a mini LED. Black levels are extremely close nowadays and most people don't watch their TV in pitch black room where the difference would be noticable. Meanwhile OLEDS are hyper reflective in a lit room and barely crack 1k nits on the most expensive models.
My 65" Sony Bravia OLED TV developed large clusters of dead pixels. This is something different than burn-in. Sony refuses to fix it after 3 years. Consider QLED if you care for longevity. I paid for mine 3000 $.
Incomming light has a huge influence on how you perceive the quality. Good ballans makes the screen lifelike and vibrent then when it has to compete with the sun. It that case will oled be more present, and satisfy the experience. But if you have a relatively dimed setting (not to many windows around), than oled will look better. You can also adjust the settings (turn auto-dim off) to make it consistently bright. If you want the best of both, go for the LG G3, imo the best tv but its expensive 🥲 As an avaerage consumer I personal thing both are aewsome, go with the biggest aewsome you want/can get. Keep in mind that sound also adds to the experience, so if you can save a few 100dollars, keep those for better 2.0 or 2.1 speaker system 💫 (i.m.o. try to avoid sound bars though).
If you have a LG C3 I heard there is a special remote you can get for it that allows you to make changes that the regular remote cant and that you can use this to turn off the auto brightness.
@@Gabe_B-1better off getting a QLED. Many OLED get burn in. Yes OLED is the best in pure picture quality, sure. But that technology has not been perfected yet. QLED is nearly as good, for cheeper price 🤷
@@Gabe_B-1 Yeah no. OLED black levels are only marginally better than mini LEDs nowadays, meanwhile OLED barely cracks 1k nits while a Hisense U8K hits 2k. Unless you're watching in a pitch black room mini LED is better.
CRT is better... It has an immersive feel than a flat picture feel... If we watch anything in CRT we feels like it's an actual object with life like feel... But in OLED or QLED whatever LED it's only high contrast image... That's it...
Idk wtf the comment section or this guy is talking about buy you can’t just compare any QLED to an OLED Tv. All QLED is is a Quantum Layer that goes over the LED’s unlocking a billion colours. That’s it. Any tv can be a QLED which is why there’s so many variants from the Samsung Q60-80 many other brands have multiple diff QLED models which all depend on how they’re lit (Dual LED, Direct Full Array, or Mini LED even QD-OLED) so you can’t just say woooooow QLED is the best and then go for a Q60 Samsung which looks dog shit compared to the worst OLED on the market. Any OLED will give you perfect blacks infinite contrast and a very sharp looking picture with no blooming and ultra wide viewing angles. QLEDS can’t. Simple as that.
@@NIGHTMARE.ONLINE until you put it in a well lit room. Mini LED hits 2k nits nowadays. Meanwhile only the best most expensive OLED hits 1k nits. Mini LED is also like 99% as black as an OLED with almost no noticeable blooming nowadays. Any mini LED will smoke a plasma.
Oled can't be turned off completely... Also the near black level chrominance overshoot is terrible ... Plus they require special technologies to avoid color banding as the hdr gredations of ths oled are limited
Do you really need a QLED TV. I use to think I need to upgrade from 1080p to 4K TV and found my 1080p TV was better. 4K TVs makes the picture look like your watching soap opera shows. Also It distorts the light displaying on the TV. I had to go into setting to change it to movie mode so I can get a better picture. Also my 1080p has louder speakers than my 4K TV. On my 4K TV I have to turn the sound up more to hear it. I think the manufacturer makes the speakers in 4K TV's less powerful. Because they want you to buy the sound bar. Just a scam if you ask me. If the TV is not broken why go out and get a new one just a waste of money.
I'm an ordinary person. My new LED TV is better than the old TV with sluggish visuals. I actually compared side to side. Anyone with eyes can tell the difference.
Just got my first OLED. LG C3. It’s niice
Think I got b2 but still love the oled. Kinda got used to it but from time to time it amazes me
Make sure to turn on hdr if you’re gaming on ps5 or pc. It makes it extra bright. (Windows or ps5 system hdr not the in game one)
@@hondarider100r the price tag is not nice though 💀
Juat got my c4
Im never going back to regular tvs b 😂
@@KingDavidTBEwhat size you have
I have neo QLED mini led and also Sony oled. Both amazing displays. Love both technologies
The 65 inch lg mini led costs half the price of a 65 inch oled
@@gatosgataros2218 miniled tv is just led with more brightness
Yo
Cool
i still have a CRT bruh
Real answer.
QLED is pretty much LCD made to look closer to OLED in order to mislead potential customers.
OLED has better image but is often too dim in bright rooms.
Wrong. Most of the time, the Qled will give a better picture quality over an OLED. Picture quality is a different thing than just having perfect blacks. When OLED were the new tech, they were better. But Qled has come a long way from where it started..
@@JuanDiaz-jo1rwoled actually has the better picture just less brightness like OP said. I’m a professional in the theater world and you’re not correct in what you said. OP is correct.
@xXPhIlIeSXx2010 When I compare the New Qled and the New OLED tvs available. The Qled has the better picture quality. The OLED might give a better RGB color spectrum, as in more accurate colors. But it is not anything that can not be adjusted on a QD-OLED. I'm not saying OLED is trash. I'm saying don't let the tech fool you. Because my eyes can see the QD- Oled picture is better than LGs picture quality at the current moment.
@@JuanDiaz-jo1rw good for you. OLED is a better picture than qled. No matter what you say. Have a great day.
@xXPhIlIeSXx2010 loljajaja sure, because you said so? Ok.
If you are gaming and you just need a bright , crisp screen without breaking the bank with great motion, go TCL QLED
Or buy a crt? You can easily get 120 Hz
i don't know any 77-inch CRTs. @@kougamecs3876
@@kougamecs3876bruh. Why would I want a crt over a qled? I know the response time is better but I can’t imagine it’s worth the sacrifice in image quality
@@Josh-gi3tu get a CRT panel from the 2000s
@@Josh-gi3tuAll but if not most CRT monitors are crisp with no damage to the quality of the picture or resolution.
I got a samsung neo qled. Qleds and neo qleds get brighter than oleds so they are better in a bright room and are better for hdr because of the extra brightess
Is it better to stream or play blu ray movies for best quality?
@@BayAreaBikeLifeplay blurays and 4kuhd blurays if you want better quality
If your fine with 65 inch go 100% with a95k! I got the a80k man love it
I have the same TV. Still blows me away every time I use it. I upgraded from a Samsung 4k LED
Oled look the best but I don't like the low brightness and the burn in risk. As a gamer I already have burn in on my CX and it made me not want to get an oled for my next tv. Might get a samsung QN90C next.
OLED is just too good, you shouldn't go back to non OLED. OLEDs are getting better and better with burn in being almost a non issue. And brightness is also getting better. If price isnt an issue, definitely go for OLED.
@@gray_gogy any particular oled tv you recommend to address my concerns?
@@nigma195 depends on your budget. The LG C3 is a great option for around 1k. But if you have a larger budget, any of the TVs that came out in 2023 or that will come out in 2024 should be good. Just do a bit of research. But the tech is ever improving.
@@gray_gogy OLED is getting marginally brighter, but mini LED is getting almost on par with black levels while hitting upwards of 2k nits and above nowadays while OLED is barely cracking 1k. The slightly better blooming isn't worth sacrificing that much brightness unless you're strictly watching in a dark room with absolutely no ambient light.
@@hyperactivetendencies7054 on my LG c2 I find myself lowering the brightness. I never have it on max brightness. I only go max brightness when there's a lot of day light in the room with the curtains open. I must admit, I do wish that it were a touch brighter so that I had more brightness in that scenario when there is way too much daylight, but in that case I just have to close the curtains. It's not too bad. But most other times, I never have it on max brightness. So to say that you need a fully dark room with zero ambient light seems like a huge exaggeration in my opinion. In fact, even with the lights on the c2 is too bright at max brightness.
To be fair, I haven't used mini led so I can't speak on pros and cons. I don't know the black levels it reaches nor the amount of blooming to say whether or not the brightness boost is worth it. Perhaps it is. Just pointing out that in MOST scenarios the LG C2 is too bright at max brightness
I just bought an LG C4 77 inch OLED. I spent 3 months researching TVs. I'm blown away with the picture quality. No other TV comes close unless its an OLED.
OLED tech is perfect image contrast and colour. As well OLED is superior for viewing gaming, movies.
Q-LED is bad for your eyes. OLED wins on all factors.
Pay more and go for OLED. Wait for a half price sale.
It will put the biggest smile on your face.
People care because QLEDs are generally brighter than OLEDs. They kan output a higher peak brightness than OLEDs and MINILEDs with QLED technology go even beyond that. So people should consider it if they watch tv in bright rooms. OLEDs are generally better in dark rooms or less bright rooms and they have incredible viewing angles. People should consider it if they want the most natural colors I would say and don’t have too much (sun)light shining into their rooms and mostly watch TV in the evening. OLEDs are relatively to QLEDs more expensive though.
Oled imo is best. You cant beat the level of darkness and still be able to see clearly without everything blooming
Qled is better anti-glare in a bright room.
No not at all
Both QLED and OLED displays can have glossy finishes. It’s less about the capability of each technology and more about the product design from the manufacturers.
I just bought a QLED 4k Samsung and its the best Tv ive ever seen.
Awesome man I have a Q80C on the way .... excited!!!
I still use my favorite plasma Panasonic VT50 from 2012
Damn. Plasma TV today is rare.
More people of both genders really need to learn about Oled because it's so much better for movies, tv shows, live tv and more also it's more power efficient so not only is it better for viewing you also save money on your power bill!
Wtf does gender have to do with OLED technology? 😂
@@trashcantacoslmao
@@trashcantacos😁🤷
@@trashcantacosIt's the opening that grabs the attention into actual act 😅 this guys must be testing this theory out 😉
OLEDs can burn-in if you're not careful, remember to turn on the screensaver or have to screen brightness not be too high, otherwise 🔥🍞📺
OLEDs have great contrast and color but are a little compromised on brightness, unless you purchase a QD-OLED or Quantum Dot OLED and both tend to be on the higher end of the price range and can suffer from burn-in. QLEDs also have great color and contrast but, the brightness is really good because these is a grid array of variable intensity LEDS that can put our more light than the individually lit pixels and sub pixels of an OLED. They also tend to be mid range on price. A big downside is something called halo-ing where in scenes with a very bright object in a field of black, can cause this haloing effect where, because there are far more pixels than there are individual backlight LEDs, they (the LEDs) can only match what the pixels are displaying to a certain extent. So there will be some light bleed around objects in that scenario. I have a Samsung QN90A NEO-QLED from 2021 and it is a great display and I barely ever notice the haloing, really only when there is white text on a black background.
This becomes more important when filming for a livestream like on a sim racing rig. I wouldn’t take anything less than OLED.
Shoutout to the PSVita, paving the way for OLED in tech.
I FINALLY UNDERSTAND IT!! THANK YOU!!! ! ❤❤
I hear about burn ins with oled I’m looking to buy a tv for gaming and watching any tips? Certainly can’t afford have it a burn in I wanna use the tv for years
why would you buy a tv for gaming
I heard that oled tv get burn while gaming I think qled is the best @grumblydoore8551
Console gaming? @@tooslze
basic the QLED is cheaper option oled still king
Thank U for this video
Was going to get the c3 65 inch but damn it gonna end up trying out a 55 qn85d we have a bright living room even with the blinds closed so it might work out for the better
I have a 4k qled tcl tv. My first 4k tv, and first qled tv. Its more of a budget 4k tv at $500, but wow its amazing. I ordered a qd oled monitor yesterday, itll be my first oled screen apart from a phone. Very excited and i cant wait to compare the colors between the 2
Qd oled is a bit of both, but higher risk of burn in, since that's a new technology and that will take a few years before they figure out a way to find a fix. Was tempted to buy the a95L last year, but some people with the a95K reported burn uns already, whereas regular oled found a fix years ago. Although the risk will always be there for regular oled tvs. The chances of your TV getting burn in, is much much slimmer than older oled tvs and Qd oled tvs. I may get the G4 or wait for the G5
OLED vs edge led? A brilliant idea! Can I compare it with CRT?
What would happen if you add a backlight behind the oled picels or edge lit an oled? Would it be a brighter OLED? Sort of a hybrid between OLED and QLED.
OLEDs are the one displays that do not benefit from backlighting. If anything it will take away from the contrast it offers. I’d only suggest bias lighting on LED TVs
Samsung and LG are making tandem oled. Which is basically just an OLED display stacked on top of another oled display. It makes the display brighter and I think more color-accurate.
I got my first oled tv samsung S95D really good ☺️☺️
So QLED is just LCD
yes, with Quantum Dots. That's it.
@@BMAChannel. isn’t quntum the stuff smaller than nucleons like leptons quarks and stuff
@@عمار_طواف yes it's just marketing strategy. People see quantum and think it's some kind of super tech.
It's WORTH.
We learn better through movies and shows nowadays.
How can I buy the wheel tv mount you’re using?
Amazon
OLED sounds pretty good right? WRONG! IT CAN BE BURNT!!! TEAM QLED ; LIKE THIS.
QLED is 7 year old technology. Don't overpay for that overrated LCD screen.
Exactly. The qd led is the next gen.
I have QD-OLED 😍
Few people will believe it, my basics I thought that the screens worked like oled, that is, that there are millions of pixels everywhere that can turn on and off, and now I have just discovered that it is in modern times that we use this screen technology
wow , very informative sir thank
Samsung ❤️
I love my Amoled screen ❤
Im thinking of getting a new tv its between the LG C2, Sony a95k and the samsung qn800b. The tv will be used for alot of movie watching and gaming. What’s best and any opinions.
OLED TVs are the best. Also check whether TV is Android or not, because it is a lot easier to transfer media files to Android TVs.
Don’t get the Qn800b get the C there’s a noticeable difference in the picture and also the anti glare technology (to avoid sunlight reflecting on the screen)
Honestly the best here is the A95K tho
The Concept of Using Prisms as Pixels in Visual Media
Imagine a world where each pixel on a screen is replaced by a small prism, manipulating white light to transform it into the shapes and colors of film. This innovative idea employs the principles of optical prisms, but instead utilizes artificial, miniature prisms that can change the characteristics of light in ways that go beyond traditional pixel displays.
Prisms as Pixels
Prisms and White Light:
Instead of each pixel displaying just one part of a color, envision each prism in the system being able to diffuse white light and convert it into various colors and shapes. As white light passes through a prism, it separates into its fundamental colors (red, blue, green, etc.), creating rich and dynamic images.
This transformation could allow for a much more organic representation of visuals, as the prisms would be capable of creating smooth gradients and transitions rather than being confined to discrete units of color like traditional pixels.
Artificial Prisms:
Instead of glass prisms, we could use artificial materials that incorporate nanoparticle movements. These movements, controlled by a CPU (Central Processing Unit), can vibrate and change the wavelength of the white light passing through them. This enables the fine control and adaptation of the colors emitted by the prisms, creating more complex and precise visual effects.
Mechanisms of Action
Nanoparticle Movements and Vibrations:
Nanoparticle technology can be employed to create flexible materials that respond to electrical impulses. These materials can vibrate at different frequencies, altering how light passes through them. Consequently, the prisms can simulate various colors and shapes in real time, enabling the creation of images that are both dynamic and interactive.
Each prism can be adjusted to emit a specific color or shape based on the desired visual output, allowing for an unprecedented level of customization.
CPU and Control:
The CPU can analyze visual data and determine which colors and shapes should be displayed based on the content being played. For instance, when a scene featuring a blue sky is shown, the CPU can activate specific nanoparticle movements in the prism to create the corresponding shade of blue. This precise control allows for high-quality displays and realism.
Advantages of This Technology
Elimination of Pixelation:
This technology could facilitate the display of images without visible pixelation, resulting in a smoother and more aesthetically pleasing visual experience. Prisms can create seamless transitions between colors, making the overall viewing experience more immersive.
Removing the pixel grid could lead to a more organic perception of visuals, reducing the harsh edges and transitions often seen in traditional displays.
Reduction of Artifacts:
By utilizing prisms instead of pixels, it may be possible to minimize artifacts like the moiré effect or blurring commonly associated with standard screens. Prisms can provide more natural representations of motion and color, enhancing the overall clarity and quality of the visual experience.
Interactivity:
This technology opens doors to new forms of interaction with visual content. Users could manipulate colors or shapes through physical interactions, creating interactive art pieces and presentations that engage audiences in unique ways.
The ability to alter the visual output in real-time could lead to innovative applications in gaming, virtual reality, and live performances.
Challenges and Considerations
Technical Feasibility:
Developing this technology will require advanced materials and engineering. Creating functional artificial prisms that are precise and fast enough for real-time operation presents a significant challenge.
Calibration would also be essential to ensure that images remain sharp and accurate despite the variability introduced by light manipulation.
Costs:
The cost of producing such devices may be high, potentially limiting their availability in the market. Research and development efforts are necessary to reduce costs and improve efficiency.
Industry Adaptation:
The film and media industry would need to adapt to new techniques of shooting and producing content that take advantage of this technology. This transition would require time and resources, as filmmakers and artists learn to work with new tools and methods.
Conclusion
The idea of using prisms as replacements for pixels that manipulate white light presents a revolutionary approach to visual media. Employing artificial prisms with nanoparticle movements allows for dynamic, interactive visualization that surpasses the limitations of traditional pixels. This technology holds the potential to create richer, more realistic, and engaging visual experiences, but it requires further research and development to become a reality. If successfully implemented, it could transform the way we experience films and other forms of visual art, offering a future where visual storytelling is not just seen but felt in a profound and interactive way.
Oled is just too good. I cant stand any kind of LCD displays
BS
They are sales pitch for people to pay more money when IRL u can't tell the difference and the specs don't even matter when ur streaming or playing classic movies
Perhaps, but any hdr content will look better on an oled
@@Josh-gi3tu the specular highlights will look much better on a mini LED. Black levels are extremely close nowadays and most people don't watch their TV in pitch black room where the difference would be noticable. Meanwhile OLEDS are hyper reflective in a lit room and barely crack 1k nits on the most expensive models.
@@hyperactivetendencies7054 have you seen the new qd-oled? There are very little mini-led tvs that match their peak brightness
You definitely can tell the difference..
Your probably color blind if you cant tell the deffrence
My 65" Sony Bravia OLED TV developed large clusters of dead pixels. This is something different than burn-in. Sony refuses to fix it after 3 years. Consider QLED if you care for longevity. I paid for mine 3000 $.
Isn't QLED newer than OLED?
I bought A95L… hope it wont disappoints ne
how is it ? bouts buy the same
LG❤
I now feel like my asus OLED is special 💀
No burn in in qoled
Burn? Idk what I’ve heard but I’ve never experienced that lol
LCD does not experience burn in because I have a LCD tv and still going strong and my next tv Is going to be QLED 4k TV.
The deciding factor is: will the manufacturer cover burn-in qled are covered up to 10 years.
Samsung has this feature
What’s the difference between a
QOLWD &
WOLED
Not the best video ever made but can help you. Woled have gotten better with MLA.
ruclips.net/video/6dZplEqP2lw/видео.html
Just got my first oled (LG C4) ; Im never going back to LED lol
Oled. A90J
New to oled very dissatisfied because of the damn auto dimming I’ve tried everything from turning the ambient light sensor off to resetting it 😢
Incomming light has a huge influence on how you perceive the quality. Good ballans makes the screen lifelike and vibrent then when it has to compete with the sun. It that case will oled be more present, and satisfy the experience. But if you have a relatively dimed setting (not to many windows around), than oled will look better. You can also adjust the settings (turn auto-dim off) to make it consistently bright. If you want the best of both, go for the LG G3, imo the best tv but its expensive 🥲
As an avaerage consumer I personal thing both are aewsome, go with the biggest aewsome you want/can get. Keep in mind that sound also adds to the experience, so if you can save a few 100dollars, keep those for better 2.0 or 2.1 speaker system 💫 (i.m.o. try to avoid sound bars though).
If you have a LG C3 I heard there is a special remote you can get for it that allows you to make changes that the regular remote cant and that you can use this to turn off the auto brightness.
@@nigma195 yea man unfortunately I have the Sony
@@michaelcatalano6208 which sony oled do you have so I can avoid it?
Dose anyone else own cheap L.E.D. T.V.'s like me?
Just say OLED is better than QLED😂
how are UST vs OLED?
what's ust
I found a TCL 65 inch TV smart 4k ultra hd hdr QLED for 500£ is a good tv ? The other QLED tvs costs about 750-1000£ price range
Buy an oled Tv they are around £1600 for 65 inch
@@Gabe_B-1better off getting a QLED. Many OLED get burn in. Yes OLED is the best in pure picture quality, sure. But that technology has not been perfected yet. QLED is nearly as good, for cheeper price 🤷
@@Gabe_B-1 Yeah no. OLED black levels are only marginally better than mini LEDs nowadays, meanwhile OLED barely cracks 1k nits while a Hisense U8K hits 2k. Unless you're watching in a pitch black room mini LED is better.
If you wanna go with tcl get the tcl Q750
Oled all day qleds have a bunch of blooming problems
Oled burns and have dead pixel resulting of a much lower lifetime.
When they make some new movies worth watching I’ll buy an OLED tv 😂
So QLED is just CRT version 2
Yes 😂 exactly
How in God's name people don't realize crt and oled is the same picture somehow.
Critical race theory?
CRT is better... It has an immersive feel than a flat picture feel... If we watch anything in CRT we feels like it's an actual object with life like feel... But in OLED or QLED whatever LED it's only high contrast image... That's it...
@@കുളിരളിയൻസ്സ് what if a oled and crt hybrid was made?
@@lunch2102Cathode ray tube
Problem is CRT is heavy
I wish i had $1k for an oled tv
LG G4❤️
Tela QLED é o tradicional LCD
A pertinent question not asked is energy use!
OLED is more energy efficient.
Almost all what he said is so so wrooo g.
CRTs are still better.
qled is just an lcd with a different method for polarization
You said Q L.E.D and then said organic light emitting diode to make it sound like you weren’t just saying L.E.D again lmfao.
Organic led or oled are not qled
@@Sailed_away read what I said then come back.
@@Sailed_away 0 reading comprehension
Idk wtf the comment section or this guy is talking about buy you can’t just compare any QLED to an OLED Tv. All QLED is is a Quantum Layer that goes over the LED’s unlocking a billion colours. That’s it. Any tv can be a QLED which is why there’s so many variants from the Samsung Q60-80 many other brands have multiple diff QLED models which all depend on how they’re lit (Dual LED, Direct Full Array, or Mini LED even QD-OLED) so you can’t just say woooooow QLED is the best and then go for a Q60 Samsung which looks dog shit compared to the worst OLED on the market. Any OLED will give you perfect blacks infinite contrast and a very sharp looking picture with no blooming and ultra wide viewing angles. QLEDS can’t. Simple as that.
Ok then why is an Qled tv more expensive then Oled tv?
they are not
Oled is more expensive bro
They’re not
What if I watch movies
Oled or miniled
QNED is like 🗿?
I cat tell the difference between a 5000$ tv and a 1000$ tv of the same size now days, only difference to me are the options ...
Nienow Ridges
Cool story bruv
So in short OLED
OLED is the best than QLED
Its called LCD cudi
My 2008 pioneer elite plasma still looks better than most new TVs I’ve tried to replace it with
We need plasmas back,i have g30 that is almost 13 years old,was thinking to.go panadonic oled, not sure will i
Dad has too
You’re trying to replace it with the wrong TV’s. Any oled c or g series will smoke that thing.
@@NIGHTMARE.ONLINE until you put it in a well lit room. Mini LED hits 2k nits nowadays. Meanwhile only the best most expensive OLED hits 1k nits. Mini LED is also like 99% as black as an OLED with almost no noticeable blooming nowadays. Any mini LED will smoke a plasma.
I come here for spandex where are they? Wtf
Basically OLED is better
She looks like Shay Sights 😅
I read it QLED vs QLED 3 times
Ohhh F**k... I wnaty CRT back 🙁🙁🙁
My iq +1 .ty ❤️
Nothing is going to compare to the qd led
Sony is among all of them lol
They have it backwards. Lol
"what's the difference between oled and qled" - "oled displays have millions of pixels" 🤦
Oled can't be turned off completely... Also the near black level chrominance overshoot is terrible ... Plus they require special technologies to avoid color banding as the hdr gredations of ths oled are limited
what is quantum layer ? :D i tell you scam !
What a figure
Basically oled is better.
it is better but way more expensive. what's better is whatever fits your budget
🧢
how
135th comment
Do you really need a QLED TV. I use to think I need to upgrade from 1080p to 4K TV and found my 1080p TV was better. 4K TVs makes the picture look like your watching soap opera shows. Also It distorts the light displaying on the TV. I had to go into setting to change it to movie mode so I can get a better picture. Also my 1080p has louder speakers than my 4K TV. On my 4K TV I have to turn the sound up more to hear it. I think the manufacturer makes the speakers in 4K TV's less powerful. Because they want you to buy the sound bar. Just a scam if you ask me. If the TV is not broken why go out and get a new one just a waste of money.
I hate RUclips shorts.
No ordinary person gives a toss I have a 20 year TV and a 5 year TV put the together no difference 🤨
I'm an ordinary person. My new LED TV is better than the old TV with sluggish visuals. I actually compared side to side. Anyone with eyes can tell the difference.
You are almost blind😎 bro...
You must have such an amazing living room... And eye sight.. lol.
Mini Led💪🏻