Why Did Counter-Strike: Source Fail Competitively?

The Source entry is seen as the black sheep of the Counter-Strike franchise if we forget about Condition Zero existence, but why is it so?
Find it out in this video!

[@krazzy6440]

You always have the best topics!

[@supertuna123]

You too dude, really enjoyed the iceworld vid! I am an hardcore fy_snow fan

[@syafiqhakimi5225]

Great analysis!

[@supertuna123]

Thx mate!

[@Luke_4044]

counter strike source could've been more polished on launch when valve didnt rush its development releasing it alongside half life 2

[@supertuna123]

Some claim HL2 to be just a tech demo for the Source engine, but imo CSS was the true tech demo

[@christiansmemefactory1513]

The recoil actually isn't different. I think Valve revealed in 2005 they used the same values as 1.6. It's really just the bigger players and smaller maps.

[@supertuna123]

The values might be the same but tbh bursting and tapping.feel very different from 1.6

[@christiansmemefactory1513]

@@supertuna123 different engine. Did you ever try CS Promod?
ruclips.net/video/Aaah4Nc7RpU/видео.html&t=

[@destroso]

I loved Source