The army, the nation was perfect, Commanders and tank designers were genius. but that guy.. the painter. he is the only reason for destruction of germany
? The entire high command were idiots. Hitler Generals made a lot of stupid decisions. And what do you mean by perfect? Unreliable, badly designed Vehicles, built with lackluster steel?
Tigers were Trash, Got stuck in a Ditch so much, Not easy to replace, And Not easy to build as well. and if you got behind it You could kill it, Easy as that.
Crew bails Out, gets a new Sherman the Same day, Transmission on the old one is repaired and sent to a new unit. Meanwhile whatever fires that AP Shell is the target of 4 more Shermans atleast. And even If it is a tough Tank, artillery, airpower, Bazooka Teams, TDs or Just a Barrage of Sherman fire will do it in.
@@harmdallmeyer6449 What a waste of material. So much metal that could be used for upgrades, and they use it to build more and more Shermans. The tank itself is crap, it only wins in terms of quantity.
@@Rip_and_Tear_Until_it_is_Done ? The Shermans didn't need to be better. Think about it, upgrading the Sherman to a Point where they can kill and Withstand Tiger IIs, they would be unreliable, impractical and you wouldn't be able to ship them overseas. Upgrading the Sherman further didn't make sense. And Sherman was by No means useless. Most German AFVs we're hopelessly outmatched. And the ones that we're better in paper had many Problems concerning the soft factors, thus making them Not too usefull.
The tiger might have had better amor but the shamans where mass predouced and was modifiable and can ataped to any event as well it speed mostly alowed it to flank the tigers with an add on the Sherman was eazy to replace and where cheep to create
@@nathaniel21cabada33 and were extremely reliable, can go on long marches, is more advanced, had an 80% crew survival rate and had some of the best ammo storage and ergonomics of the war
Remember that shermans could not even scratch tigers armor with their 75mm cannon But the tigers 88mm cannon could pierce those tin cans like a hot knife through butter
@@natedebate3926 says the commander who ran back to base and fudged his kills after his tiger was annihilated by a sherman and apparently didn’t according to the german last light count data
On July 8th, 1943, a Tiger tank commanded by Franz Staudegger took on fifty attacking T-34 tanks as the only armored vehicle on its side (though it did have infantry support), destroying twenty-seven enemy tanks and forcing the remainder to break off their attack and fall back.
You sure it wasn’t the Panther’s top reaching hypersonic spee that inspired the V-2. I mean, if not for Goddard, the Panther upon meeting a Sherman probably did lol (3.6:1)
@@City1Tiger doubt its like a heavy sherman it has all the good soft factors of a sherman, and new improved hard factors like that 90mm gun and armor that is way better angled and way thicker than the tigers
“Sherman’s were always better” -American tanker as their sherman fails to penetrate tiger 1 armor and is simply blown up with a well placed shell from the tiger
Fun fact: the tiger 1 was so outdated because of no sloped armor only 1000 of it were made. Edit: it also gussled the fuel so fast it makes fun of badlands for chugging the entire ocean while it literally gussled so much fuel thats why it was bad too.
While the tiger did have a better destruction to destroyed ratio, it was almost cannon fodder for soviet and American tanks due to its low horsepower and slow speed
@@TheLordsFollower Did you forget that 60 percent of tigers were destroyed by their own crew after having optics destroyed, their engine failing, or just falling apart. Most tigers were abandoned and then just shot at later. Sure they did kill almost 10 times the number lost, but they were still so rare that the information is insignificant. The panzer IV made up most of the German army’s tanks and were steamrolled by late war tanjs
@@TheLordsFollower Both, panthers were more common during the war, with stug assault guns being even more common. Tigers were very very rare with the tiger B being even more rare
@@JohnLennonsImagimaryAccount They never abandoned tigers, since they didn't want the allies to capture it and use it as their own. The tigers had a self destruct button inside of them which the crews were under strict command to use if they had to leave the tank
The problem with german tanks werent that the transmition is bad, allmost all tanks in up to after ww2 had shit transmitions. The problem was : the germans didn't design/produce a recovery vehicle that could tow the massive tank.
I love the Tiger, (im american) but its problem was more American and Soviet tanks could easily outnumber tigers. Yea it had a massive gun, but the backside armor was weak so If it got ambushed it’s pretty much fucked. Overall 8.5/10 and 11/10 for looks
Imagine the military literally uses the tiger 131 (the only captured tiger) decided to change its engine for a modern tank engine, a refined current modern tank gun that can pierce through more tougher armor, and a stronger armor💀
The "indestructible technologically superior war machine" that violated the neutrality of a bunch of smaller nations and took a gamble with France and won only because of sheer luck, and then got obliterated by the Allies to the point of not existing for several decades 😂 ffs, they went from 2nd strongest army in Europe in 1942 to the 4th strongest army in Berlin in 1945 🤣🤣
"the tiger sucks the Sherman beats it" my guy brush up on your history the allies were getting beaten armor wise untill the Sherman firefly came and the addition of the "king tiger" didn't make it better that thing was a tiger I on steroids it had a flak 88 as it's main gun 💀☠️💀☠️💀☠️💀
the 88mm gave you an advantage in range, but that advantage was pointless if you never fought at that range, if you didnt than that gun became sort of a disadvantage
It wasn't trash. It was slightly bad. It was unreliable, had an outdated design for 1942, too few were produced. No seriously, only 1.3k were produced. It literally didn't change anything.
the tiger 1 designated [panzerkampfwagen 6] was a german heavy tank frontal armor 120mm main armament 8.8 cm kwk 37 gun info the tiger was a decent tank but must not be overestimated with movie’s the transmission had a likely hood to breakdown and lacked sloped armor and the tiger 1 H had a tall cupola which was a target for tanks to disable the tiger problem was fixed on the later tiger 1E tigers made around 1300
Idk why people compare tanks like video game weapons. On paper as a breakthrough tank, hulled down and destroying enemy tanks and fortifications the tiger has the edge. But thats about it, Sherman’s were higher in numbers, spare parts, had very useful tank destroyer variants, along with air superiority. Not to mention Sherman’s were still very good tanks. They had better anti infantry capabilities, were more mobile and quicker to respond. Easily upgradable to suit certain needs such as artillery, carrying infantry and supplies, anti air, more amor, better anti tank capabilities, better suspension, smarter ammo storage, mine clearer and more. They were easier to make, maintain, upgrade and use. All while serving well in its purpose. Considering 80% ish of the time tanks were not fighting other tanks, rather infantry and held down positions. To conclude the Sherman was a much better tank to have in an army. Though saying any tank is the best is objectively wrong imo, but the Sherman was a great tank for the US and I’d take jt over a tiger 9 times out of 10.
For germans to go up against all kinds of allied tanks. Please use those two... Hetzers and the stugs. Then modify them... Is it really that hard ? stop going bigger, start getting smaller, agile, and effective
@@Panzer_Craze It did not. The ones who designed the hetzer knew what they were doing. It was cheap, cheaper than the StuG IIIs and IVs, effective, and perfect for what kind of war Germany was fighting at the time.
Sherman is a tin can for a TIGER.
oh if it was so powerful than why didnt they win the war a sherman SINGULAR could take out a tiger by itself and it happened many times
@@Cr1n-l4sThere's a story of a M8 Greyhound taking down a Tiger.
@@justmrcrow yup and sherman and Chaffee too i bet
@@justmrcrowit was a tiger 2 actually
@@LEFISHY2 They have basically the same side armor so it doesn't matter that much
The army, the nation was perfect, Commanders and tank designers were genius. but that guy.. the painter. he is the only reason for destruction of germany
? The entire high command were idiots. Hitler Generals made a lot of stupid decisions. And what do you mean by perfect? Unreliable, badly designed Vehicles, built with lackluster steel?
hes the reason why everything got perfect
He was supposed to take care of politics not war
Leider, if he would have been at least a nice guy the world would look perfect for us
Le bro?
The True power of DUESTCHLAND tiger panzer unleashed
the tiger sucks and you can fight me about it, i guarantee i know more than you
Das ist Deutschland nicht duestland
Panzerkampfwagon ist nett und groß
@@wack_tha_wackySame Thing?
You lost 😂😂
@@borisborence2687 still a pretty good tank
Sherman when angles: 😵🪦🪦😵
Tiger when angles: 💪💪💪💪
Tigers were Trash, Got stuck in a Ditch so much, Not easy to replace, And Not easy to build as well. and if you got behind it You could kill it, Easy as that.
@@Average_Burgabut it still was a very formidable tank it’s just not as good as people say it is
@@hypergidra2407 I think he means that it cant be mass produced
@@RMSMajestic1933 he was saying two things, one being it’s hard to replace and the other being it’s easy to kill
tigers don’t angle you gotta remember it takes multiple crew to run these things
"Shermans are way better" says this until taking an AP shell in the lower front armor and simply blowing up the entire tank.
Crew bails Out, gets a new Sherman the Same day, Transmission on the old one is repaired and sent to a new unit.
Meanwhile whatever fires that AP Shell is the target of 4 more Shermans atleast. And even If it is a tough Tank, artillery, airpower, Bazooka Teams, TDs or Just a Barrage of Sherman fire will do it in.
@@harmdallmeyer6449 What a waste of material. So much metal that could be used for upgrades, and they use it to build more and more Shermans.
The tank itself is crap, it only wins in terms of quantity.
@@harmdallmeyer6449 And the Tiger 1 is also Shit. A PTRD can penetrate the breaches and explode or kill the crew.
@@Rip_and_Tear_Until_it_is_Done ? The Shermans didn't need to be better. Think about it, upgrading the Sherman to a Point where they can kill and Withstand Tiger IIs, they would be unreliable, impractical and you wouldn't be able to ship them overseas. Upgrading the Sherman further didn't make sense.
And Sherman was by No means useless. Most German AFVs we're hopelessly outmatched. And the ones that we're better in paper had many Problems concerning the soft factors, thus making them Not too usefull.
@@harmdallmeyer6449 So, Sherman Calliope and Crocodile were modifications to match these requirements?
Tiger tanks were not shit sure their production was short and ours was longer but believe me they were not shit
Coming from an IS-4 dude I agree
they were shit fight me
The tiger might have had better amor but the shamans where mass predouced and was modifiable and can ataped to any event as well it speed mostly alowed it to flank the tigers with an add on the Sherman was eazy to replace and where cheep to create
@@nathaniel21cabada33 and were extremely reliable, can go on long marches, is more advanced, had an 80% crew survival rate and had some of the best ammo storage and ergonomics of the war
Remember that shermans could not even scratch tigers armor with their 75mm cannon
But the tigers 88mm cannon could pierce those tin cans like a hot knife through butter
Bud sherman firefly can destroy a tiger with no problem
@@ElEliteAzul Most shermans couldnt and the tigers 88 was still better
Someone: the tiger is trash and the Sherman is way better
Tiger 1: what’s a Sherman? That doesn’t exist to me 😈
Who actually said the Sherman is better I like the Sherman but just the regular m4 isn’t going to do shit to the tiger
@@ethanbiglefthand3476 oh it can it took out tigers many times
@@Cr1n-l4s true after this post I heard many times it took it out
The sherman is infact better in many factors, such as mobility
also the later shermans were equipped with guns capable of penetrating a tiger
whats a transmission doesn't exist on tigers either
i must get a tatoo with a tiger, legendary machine
thanks bro I'm german I love this
Is-2: laughing at the back
Pershing smileing
Maus:guten tag:)or no is 2 is really better than this shit called tank
The ratt:mere children
@@death5348 no my friend maus is the fat rat:)
Tiger 2: laughing in the corner
German Tanks Kills 578 t 34 and 1754 Sherman's At total
Or more
?
How tank can get killed?they destroyed,not killed
You do know 44k t34 were destroyed rigth?
you really believe that? the tiger commanders almost all the time, fudged their kills saying the have more than what they actually killed
@@monikaalts3905 yea
*engine catches fire*
Yeah, after obliterating 4 Shermans
@@natedebate3926 it would burn down before getting within 2 miles of the shermans
@@CurbyKai you wish 🤡
@@CurbyKai it would break down before that lmao 🤣
@@natedebate3926 says the commander who ran back to base and fudged his kills after his tiger was annihilated by a sherman and apparently didn’t according to the german last light count data
On July 8th, 1943, a Tiger tank commanded by Franz Staudegger took on fifty attacking T-34 tanks as the only armored vehicle on its side (though it did have infantry support), destroying twenty-seven enemy tanks and forcing the remainder to break off their attack and fall back.
1 tiger vs 60 t-34? Happened, tiger 1? Takes down 20 shermans no doubt
1 Sherman 75 vs 1 Tiger? Happened, Sherman 75.
@@harmdallmeyer6449 no lmao. 75mm cant pen tiger 1.
@@PercySufferson it could. Enough evidence If that.
It did struggle from the Front. But you don't need to penetrated a Tanks armor to kill it.
@@harmdallmeyer6449 those sims are not real. Lmao.
@@PercySufferson Sims?
76mm Sherman’s be like
Never attack a Tiger when it’s angled..
The top of the Sherman flying off due to the ammo rack exploding is what invented NASA
You sure it wasn’t the Panther’s top reaching hypersonic spee that inspired the V-2. I mean, if not for Goddard, the Panther upon meeting a Sherman probably did lol (3.6:1)
@@danielmolinar8669 a sherman has no chance against a Panther
What a Machine it was 🔥
Hill entered the chat
Tiger tank can destroy 4 sherman but remember america always have 5 sherman
M26 Pershing: 😐
Tiger 1 would smoke it
@@City1Tiger doubt its like a heavy sherman it has all the good soft factors of a sherman, and new improved hard factors like that 90mm gun and armor that is way better angled and way thicker than the tigers
@@Cr1n-l4s yeah I know your right
after burning all its ammo trying to hit its upper plate@@City1Tiger
Learned this from BF V:
The tiger tanks would run out of ammo faster then the Americans running out of tanks.
This is what I call, “poggers”
“Sherman’s were always better”
-American tanker as their sherman fails to penetrate tiger 1 armor and is simply blown up with a well placed shell from the tiger
yeah if they didn't get stuck in a ditch or Hit from behind with a Sherman shell.
“Tiger is better”
-German taker after his transmission catch on fire, his track are rail off, and his Tiger stuck in mud.
How to destroy a Tiger:
Step 1: watch it drive
Step 2: Congratulations, you've successfully destroyed a tiger!
In what world does a good shot from a Sherman NOT pen a tiger 1? Especially from typical combat range?
Hans shtart ze panzer
Hans"happy Deutch noises"
You even put GuP big respect also agreed Maho best leader for commanding the Tiger I
* sherman fireflay sounds *
And bounce
hmm i smell garbage
Firefly
Gay Firefly
@@deagleqw8950 I smell uneducated
Begining: just random shlart about tiger being bad
End type of area: Get shat on
Fun fact: the tiger 1 was so outdated because of no sloped armor only 1000 of it were made.
Edit: it also gussled the fuel so fast it makes fun of badlands for chugging the entire ocean while it literally gussled so much fuel thats why it was bad too.
Is-2: Really?
ARL-44:Really?
Fv-4005 stage II:Really?
T29:Really?
Does the ARL 44 and FV 4005 really count? They were built after ww2
And the t29 too@@hypergidra2407
Panther 2>
the m36/any sherman with 76
Laughs in tiger E
i remember that one battle where there was a bunch of shermans fight panthers and tigers and the shermans just utterly dominated
@@Cr1n-l4spretty sure that was cuz one rammed the tiger
@@emeliawiranata5256 no it wasnt lol
@@Cr1n-l4s what was the battle name?
@@Cr1n-l4s cuz if u don't know what the name is then you're point is invalid
In fury: 4 Sherman vs 1 Tiger= Tiger dead but destroyed 3 of them, POWER OF DEUTSCHLAND
*Jumbo sharmen has joined the chat
Any 76mm sherman laugh in corners
While the tiger did have a better destruction to destroyed ratio, it was almost cannon fodder for soviet and American tanks due to its low horsepower and slow speed
r we forgetting that in the battle of kursk 1 tiger fended off 50 t 34 and took 22 of them out while not one penetrated its armor?
@@TheLordsFollower Did you forget that 60 percent of tigers were destroyed by their own crew after having optics destroyed, their engine failing, or just falling apart. Most tigers were abandoned and then just shot at later. Sure they did kill almost 10 times the number lost, but they were still so rare that the information is insignificant. The panzer IV made up most of the German army’s tanks and were steamrolled by late war tanjs
@@JohnLennonsImagimaryAccount those are true aganist the tiger 2... this is really just a question wether you talk about tiger 1 or 2
@@TheLordsFollower Both, panthers were more common during the war, with stug assault guns being even more common. Tigers were very very rare with the tiger B being even more rare
@@JohnLennonsImagimaryAccount They never abandoned tigers, since they didn't want the allies to capture it and use it as their own. The tigers had a self destruct button inside of them which the crews were under strict command to use if they had to leave the tank
The problem with german tanks werent that the transmition is bad, allmost all tanks in up to after ww2 had shit transmitions.
The problem was : the germans didn't design/produce a recovery vehicle that could tow the massive tank.
the later shermans had excellent transmissions
@@Cr1n-l4s true
They did create the Panther recovery vehicle.
Yeah just use a Panther that had transmission issues already to tow even bigger vehicles
Führer Someone is making a edit of our tanks
Hitler: We don't fear Americans that's why
You are right 👍
you better, they feared america when they saw a sea full of out metal, oh wait they weren’t afraid they were terrifyed
yup.@@Cr1n-l4s
meanwhile me a sturmtiger enjoyer:
Me an Abrams X enjoyer:
POV : Hans got better transmission
Ahem you forgot his twin
His twin :tiger 131: remember me
Piooola wey, chidisimo
I love the Tiger, (im american) but its problem was more American and Soviet tanks could easily outnumber tigers. Yea it had a massive gun, but the backside armor was weak so
If it got ambushed it’s pretty much fucked. Overall 8.5/10 and 11/10 for looks
“76 mm intensifies” lol
*M4A3E8 and Sherman Firefly enter the chat*
Jumbo joins the chat@@ProbablyNotSomethingImportant
Literally the Sherman just beated the tiger in the movie
700 views wtf?
Song name and version ?
My Voiceline when become Tank Commander:TARGET 11 O'clock 1736 YARD
*king tiger Enter chat*
*Tiger left chat
Gute Wunderwaffen für das Vaterland.
Jumbo joins the chat
Imagine the military literally uses the tiger 131 (the only captured tiger) decided to change its engine for a modern tank engine, a refined current modern tank gun that can pierce through more tougher armor, and a stronger armor💀
1947 our indirect friend❤❤❤❤
Soviet tanks with ridiculous speeds: 💀
Soviet tank destroyers: 💀
British firefly: 💀
Literally any infantry which can get below the line of sight: 💀
No extra parts: 💀
No fuel: 💀
Complete allied air superiority: 💀
More than 1000 soviet artillery: 💀
The red army at Berlin gate: 💀
The "indestructible technologically superior war machine" that violated the neutrality of a bunch of smaller nations and took a gamble with France and won only because of sheer luck, and then got obliterated by the Allies to the point of not existing for several decades 😂
ffs, they went from 2nd strongest army in Europe in 1942 to the 4th strongest army in Berlin in 1945 🤣🤣
The music 😂😂😂
Que lindo bicho es el tiger 1 😍
Make a edit about Stefanbof battlefield v with this music
The crew for the tiger in fury probably didn't even go to tank school
The t35-85’s honest reaction tot eh tiger 100mm in close range:😂
I❤ it
Laughs in mosquito FB mk IV
All fun and games until the t24 pershing showes up
Tiger 1 and tiger 2
Is king tiger for me
Germany :WHAT YOU SAY BOYS DEAL WITH THEM
TIGER 1
TIGER 2
KING TIGER
PANTHER
LÖWE
STURM TIGER
MAUZ
WHITE TIGER
They lost
@@unsuisseegare1291 for numbers not for other think
Average wehraboo fantasy:
@@saffronorc1724 ???
@@chile780 just saying
"the tiger sucks the Sherman beats it" my guy brush up on your history the allies were getting beaten armor wise untill the Sherman firefly came and the addition of the "king tiger" didn't make it better that thing was a tiger I on steroids it had a flak 88 as it's main gun 💀☠️💀☠️💀☠️💀
the 88mm gave you an advantage in range, but that advantage was pointless if you never fought at that range, if you didnt than that gun became sort of a disadvantage
The Tiger II did not have a 88mm Flak, if you want to talk about it do it correctly.
@@justmrcrow yea it did… dumbass 8.8cm KwK 43 L/71
@@justmrcrow 8.8 cm KwK 43 L/71 anti-tank cannon. My bad I confused it with the 88...
@@tofu68 💀
The tiger managed to destroy 3 shermans (possibly more) before even dying
thats a myth, a sherman singular, could take out a tiger all by itself and it happened many times
@@Cr1n-l4s bro learned about tanks from mcdonalds tank academy
@@dev6923-yd1tg bro learned his tank knowledge from dumbass wehraboos and the german tank commanders memoirs
Bro you dont know about something called :Jumbo:@@dev6923-yd1tg
@@dev6923-yd1tgwhy? What he say is true. In multiple reports (with confirmation, I might add) 1 Sherman kill a Tiger.
Every Sherman destroyed, 5-8 more replaced it.
Have fun with that.
they prob had more problems with the m10s and m36sin the bushes
Shermans armor isnt enough to protect it from the tigers 88 but the shermans had the upper hand with numbers
To be fair, the M4 Sherman was never really meant to be affective against tanks in the first place
Until firefly
So a Sherman is WEAK bro the armor is THIN
Someone who say tiger I is trash, they really needed some history therapy
It wasn't trash. It was slightly bad.
It was unreliable, had an outdated design for 1942, too few were produced.
No seriously, only 1.3k were produced. It literally didn't change anything.
@@justmrcrowno it was also pretty bad with everything else
@@Cr1n-l4s Yeah
A lot of tigers were lost to either engine breakdowns/fires or due to the transmission breaking down
is it still that good when it cant even move?
Kuromorimine 😱😰🤯🥶😳
the tiger 1 designated [panzerkampfwagen 6] was a german heavy tank
frontal armor 120mm
main armament 8.8 cm kwk 37 gun
info
the tiger was a decent tank but must not be overestimated with movie’s
the transmission had a likely hood to breakdown and lacked sloped armor and the tiger 1 H had a tall cupola which was a target for tanks to disable the tiger problem was fixed on the later tiger 1E
tigers made around 1300
The Tiger 1 (E & H) Both Had a 102mm Upper front plate
Firefly and tiger are equal in my opinion. Both have good gun. Tiger has better armor, but firefly has better reliability
M4A3E8 is the best of all the sherman variants and better than the tiger
If only they had more tigers than panzers
German Tank was always the best
nah
Not actually
Video/Content: 👍🏻
German translations: ☠️ (Greetings im german)
No wonder why when I use tiger H1 those Sherman’s one shot me
In reality fury is a good movie don’t get me wrong it’s one of my favorites but is not historically correct
it was mostly
wasnt tiger in war with 5 m4 shermans in this movie and destroyed 4😈?
Not all shermans can destroy a tiger
And 4 shermans can be replaced with ease
nah if you see and angled tiger thats the time you know your ded
Omg fury
500th comment🎉
First video cool and strong Tiger I!... Second video☠️
It’s true because the normal Sherman the tigers shell could penetrate the armor and kill the crew
thats true it could and it happened alot
@@Cr1n-l4s thank you for fact checking them
After 3 shots
One thing the tiger 1 loses at is 1 IS2
122 MM VS 88 MM
The music Name is is low im german best edit
Idk why people compare tanks like video game weapons. On paper as a breakthrough tank, hulled down and destroying enemy tanks and fortifications the tiger has the edge. But thats about it, Sherman’s were higher in numbers, spare parts, had very useful tank destroyer variants, along with air superiority.
Not to mention Sherman’s were still very good tanks. They had better anti infantry capabilities, were more mobile and quicker to respond. Easily upgradable to suit certain needs such as artillery, carrying infantry and supplies, anti air, more amor, better anti tank capabilities, better suspension, smarter ammo storage, mine clearer and more.
They were easier to make, maintain, upgrade and use. All while serving well in its purpose. Considering 80% ish of the time tanks were not fighting other tanks, rather infantry and held down positions.
To conclude the Sherman was a much better tank to have in an army. Though saying any tank is the best is objectively wrong imo, but the Sherman was a great tank for the US and I’d take jt over a tiger 9 times out of 10.
Tigee 1😎
There was flaws such as the transmission but in all fairness: A it was sexy asf
B it had a good gun
C good armour
D based
Yet it’s weakness was its engine bc it’s the vulnerable spot and it breaks down PRETTY OFTEN
the sherman 75mm could easily pen the side of the tiger
@@Panzer_Craze fr
My Tiger in War Thunder Mobile could literally kill anyone who stands in his way
Press X to doubt
No?
@@Cr1n-l4s sorry, i forgot to put angling
@@BlackSkull1984 nah ur good
@@Cr1n-l4s ofc, im good, i never be bad
If only the movies were based on a true story😂
Sauce name:Girls Und Panzer
"Miho panzer is drifting, Maho Tiger is turning"
Bro I watched Girls und Panzer and I know that Tiger I was destroyed
Bro I like to Edit But if your favorite tank is the tiger You're probably a little Wild
For germans to go up against all kinds of allied tanks. Please use those two...
Hetzers and the stugs.
Then modify them... Is it really that hard ? stop going bigger, start getting smaller, agile, and effective
Those who engineered the Hetzers and StuGs knew what they were doing at least.
the hetzer kind of sucked
@@Panzer_Craze why ? It's much better than the stugs...
@@Panzer_Craze It did not. The ones who designed the hetzer knew what they were doing. It was cheap, cheaper than the StuG IIIs and IVs, effective, and perfect for what kind of war Germany was fighting at the time.
@@justmrcrow It was effect in combat mostly because it was given to more experience crews
angling is useless
tiger: are you sure about that?
nobody angled irl
Sherman may be a Lion in pacific but in west its just a little rat
O Tiger I é um dos tanques de guerra mais lindos que conheço
Honestly, in firepower and armor, Tiger is better then sheman. But in mobility and Replaceability, Sherman is top.
bro 2025 tiger1 will be modernized fort armor are 875mm💀💀