I have one cottage i have rented several times. The last 2 were bad being the last one was the worst. I have people begging me to do so…..I WILL NEVER RENT IT AGAIN.. EVER. Thanks NY🖕🏻
That’s exactly what I thought, why would anyone wanna be a landlord anywhere? The shit going on in this country needs to be stopped, I only hope we’re not past the point of no return.
Im in it now. Rome NY. Tenants stop paying me. Been in and out of court for almost a year. Trying to get them out. I live in the same house. The court gave them a free lawyer. Im done after this. Ill never rent that apartment again. Im gonna sell the rental properties. I have a good tenant in my other house. Shes paying way under market rate. Shes been a good tenant for 10 years. After i sell the houses. Who knows what someone else will do. No way in hell im staying in this landlord game. The government and these piece of shit tenants have caused me an incredible amount of stress. Im an industrial mechanic in a factory. I work tons of hours. Breaking my back. I dont have time for bullshit. Im a 100 percent a great landlord. Its not worth it.
You know what else? These piece of shit tenants stopped paying me. While I dumped almost $20,000 in the septic system. The government doesn't care. The tenants don't care. Never again.
@jcoolman4854 when the private property managers took control over public housing, in the 1970s, they made false promises. Then all the properties they managed died. It was a planned attack. Then the private housing sector promised good housing, and then why so many new laws to protect customers?
I have a 2 family home in NY. Currently have a great tenant. However, if and when she ever decides to move on, my plan is to convert the entire home into a duplex. Renting your propeert in NY is not worth it.
We have a 3 family in Connecticut and rent to no one our sons live with us on the other 2 floors. We lived here over 35 years and had a few renters do thousands in damage even with us living in the building so we stopped renting.
the other problem is that if th landlord is not able to get rid of bad tenants. then the bad tenants can make life bad forr the good tenants. to the point that good tenants will move. leaving nothing but bad tenants. in which it can cost the landlord money. cause all good tenants will look at the building and think no way i'm moving in this place with th bad tenants that the landlord is renting to.
@georgewagner7787 is it unlawful to smoke pot in NY ? And is the whole building listed as non smoking? It also appears that if smoking is allowed only in units, and that is happening, then there is no legal issue.
Thank you for helping bring attention to the problem. The GCE will have far reaching damage. I was limited in my response d/t length. The other huge fact is landlords who have owned their properties for decades and can afford to keep rent below Fair market rent will be penalized if they don't raise rent to FMR. When they go to sell, buyers knowing that the tenants and rent cost is grandfathered in. So if I charge $1000/flat but market rent is $1600 my potential buyer won't pay full value because there is no means to increase the rent except 5% + CPI. Thus unless I raise rents now to market which for some tenants will be $600, I will damaging my business.
I've kicked out a prospective tenant during a unit showing because they almost immediately started making threatening and incredibly disrespectful comments towards other people viewing the apartment and towards me when I refused to budge and demanded he submit written application and go through screening because I wasn't just going to hand him the keys based on his good-ol-boy story. The guy was also clearly drunk at the showing (and drove himself there). Sure its a potentially fuzzy line what behavior might be considered disrespectful or funny but seems to me if you are trying to qualify for a new apartment, you are on your best behavior. Showing up drunk or high, making inappropriate or threatening statements, getting overtly political or reli***us, demanding preferential terms or to skip screening (trying to haggle is one thing but being aggressive about it and refusing to accept it if owner/agent won't budge is another), messing with, damaging, or trying to take current tenants stuff if occupied, etc. None of that is a good look and is more than enough in most landlord's POV for skipping that applicant and moving on to the next one. (Note I've had every one of these examples happen to me when I self-managed my properties. Part of the reason I went to Property management is the people who try this kind of thing generally KNOW they are terrible tenants and are trying to push their way in via intimidation. This is much less likely with a good PM.)
"Good Cause" makes no sense, a lease should end when it ends. I do not recommend investing in areas with such laws, but to the ones that have no choice, it is important, vital, to have a good strong lease, because it is almost a certainty that tenants violate the lease in some way, and those violations do amount to good cause for eviction. Even if a property owner isn't in such a draconian area, a strong lease is still important. But I see so many property owners with a lease that is just five or six pages long, and I can assure them, that those leases are inadequate. I'm in Texas, a supposedly "landlord friendly" state, and my lease, when including addendums and house rules, is over 20 pages, and covers everything from when the refuse receptacles must be removed from curb side, to the presence of lithium batteries (cell phones, tablets, children's toys and ev/hybrid vehicles), even the rent due date. Any one violation is not enough for eviction, because a judge would likely order the tenant to cure the default (like put away the trash can in accordance to the lease) and consider the matter resolved. But if the tenant breaches the lease, then does it again, then does it again, and the landlord documented each violation and informed the tenant each time with a notice of default, then this repeat behavior is enough for the property owner to prove that the tenant has no intention of following the terms of the lease and needs to be evicted. If rent is a day late, that is a breach of the lease. Doesn't matter if it's not late enough to trigger a late fee, the due date is what is stated in the lease, and any day after is a breach of the lease, and if done frequently enough, is cause for eviction, so long as the property owner issued the notice each time. Please, have a good strong lease everyone, and document and send notice with each violation. Even if it's a good tenant, if the tenant is not following the lease, I've found that a notice of default tends to get the tenant (good ones at least) to change their behavior for the better.
What lease is there here? Since so many state laws makes one universal lease agreement impossible. I don't understand this whole thing because of it. And again criticizing law is not a defense from making mistakes you must be held accountable. Or worse violations of building codes and customer protection laws.
@@stevengoldstein114, I'm just stating the obvious, eviction is only possible with good cause, and if the lease is a good lease, then the tenant is probably violating the lease in some way and providing the property owner with the good cause needed to evict. It all starts with a good lease, and then the property owner can sift through the lease, identify the violations, and begin the eviction process
It’s not a good idea to put a judge in the middle of all this. Courts are already backed up. Landlords are going to have to waste time and money on lawyers. I doubt if judges really care about making the right decisions. They are just going to do whatever looks good at the moment, which is ruling in favor of the tenant almost all the time. It’s not their money. Landlord can deal with it. All this is going to make landlords disappear and rents go up.
@@stevengoldstein114 we all know "requiring" something is no guarantee of making it true. All tenants are required to pay their rent on time, for example. You are constantly railing against the few bad landlords out there, despite myriad laws requiring them to behave better. You expect all landlords to damage their business in futhering of more tenant protections instead of altering their business models to protect themselves. Another example, In my city prosecutors are actually boycotting a particular city judge who was appointed during our far left council phase as that judge is known for always finding criminal cases not guilty no matter how clear cut the evidence was. Now all this judge sees is parking enforcement cases.
@madderscience all this ranting and story telling. You cannot just say your opinions and expect them to be considered evidence. This is the same old song and dance.
Let me tell you guys something else. I called 7 lawyers. To handle my eviction. All but one of them took my case. The others said they stopped doing evictions. Because its an enormous pain in the ass.
Every democratic politician in New York State from the governor on down to lowly council members try to make a name for themselves with tenant protections. New York tenants are over protected with laws and regulations. Tenant advocacy groups never stop complaining, and the courts are overwhelmed. Tenant advocacy groups basically own democratic politicians. As a small landlord, it's sickening. New York has become the "free housing" state.
I emailed my Council person...she is a Democrat I know I will get back a standard gaslighting nice email back........but I wanted it in writing that my sister is a senior citizen with severe health issues and she has a professional tenant.. and the repercussions to her health and finances....and the family who is now helping pay lawyers fees............my family are former police, teachers and firemen......not wealthy people hard working...We worked for our homes.
Rochester NY just fell (got infected with Good Cause legislation). Syracuse and Buffalo to follow. They are also abandoning the "10 units or more" trope. They all are adopting more than ONE unit you are a "large landlord"
Government is too involved in daily life. Seems everywhere that can stick their grubby hands in, they have. No remorse. No repentance. Just get in it an see if they can receive a gain in some way from it.
Thanks for the breakdown! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
Bro there are 1,000s of TERRIBLE LANDLORDS THATs why we need the protections and to think its idiotic is exactly why we need the law. Landlords forget one simple aspect that lease is a "Busines agreement." The tenant is not a subordinate they are an agreement Business partner. The laws protect businesses' interests . The tenant is a Business representative. Imaging buying a home and the landlord is a supreme ass and just decides to bot renew the lease? Thats insane to even assume you should have the power. The expectation of renting is never assumed to be short term . So thats crazy to evict them after a year or paying rent because of your feelings. Lol 😅😅😅😅😅
The laws are heavy on the tenants side...tenants also get free lawyers....the law is so much on the tenants side that a child can represent in court............These laws should not be the same for a building and a small 2 family or a Brownstone in Brooklyn......These laws were written to squeeze the middle class....buildings can afford to lose rent....and have more for lawyers..........there are PROFESSIONAL tenants that so this...over and over...and stay months even a year or two..... these types target older people with a 2 family..Imagine going through that...and I know of people in that situation and the people are selling drugs....
@CynthiaBiel All of that May be true , but that is a truth in all aspects of every business. However when it comes to "Homes " sorry but save the drama. You are dealing with people who are looking for "for ever " or close to you and you Decided to represent that need and fulfilled it. Imagine saying that its hard for a landlord as it tenants are some secondary to the process when their the primary, without them you have no income or business. To get into business to sell homes no you should not have the ability to govern if they can stay or go based on how you feel. Nothing in your agreement states you have to like them or even be friends. Do you realize how Insanely terrible landlords because of their "feelings " about everything. I have see 100's of full families on the streets in the cold of winter with their kids in the friggin snow.. landlords that are not controlled are a nuisance to a family. My last landlord threatened me , out dead rats in front of my door.. had many many dudes stand in my driveway to intimated me when coming home.. they have their family's members pull guns on my lil nephew family and friends... see when the owner passed away she didnt leave the house to her oldest son... he hated me so for 13 years he terroirized my entire family. I avoided going to cour to no have my public record damaged whike I'm seeking new property. Boom god bless me i finally found one after 5 years with my 2 dogs... 7 months after moving in the management has tried to extort extra $500.. has bought 2 fraudlent cases against me when i refused to pay them extra $500 on top of our agreement for rent.. then threatened to have any gove assistance removed . Ao they called hra and claimed that I was on drugs ( never did any in my entire life) and they started a c.a.s.a againsts me.. save me the poor landlord defense. Time after time landord assumes tenants are subordinates in service to them and has to do what they say and we don't. You're not selling socks its homes. If you treated the tenants like the business partner they are you would avoid most issues but nope.
By the way, RUclips is starting a massive change to prohibit clickbaiting. Which is something Tony has been doing for years. Maybe he will be forced to stop making videos about unproven or worse very fake interpretations of REAL NEWS.
Madderscience constantly clams that judges are unfair to landlords and in a recent rant also said they are biased toward criminals. Remember the US Constitution says it is assumed innocent before proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. And that rules and chains of evidence and criminal procedures must be followed. This is why the challenge results in 10 guilty men free for 1 innocent to be convicted.
Face it the landlords will all leave based on your advice. Since you have no evidence of who are the good landlords or bad ones, AND that with your own evidence, you select bad tenants all the time. At best your process does not work because you have no records of proven true positive selection, true negative selection and most importantly no false positive selection and false negative selection.
Positive selection starts with the State and market in which you invest your equity. Investors with options are moving out of markets where the deck is stacked against them.
@robgrey6183 You are not addressing the landlord responsibility or the lack of evidence to support any selection process that results in inevitable desperate impact housing discrimination. Which is illegal. To prove disparate impact discrimination in housing, you need to demonstrate that a seemingly neutral housing policy or practice has a disproportionate negative effect on a protected group, such as people of a certain race, ethnicity, or familial status, without a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the disparity, essentially showing that the policy's outcome, not necessarily its intent, is discriminatory; this is usually done through statistical analysis comparing the impact of the policy on different groups
@@stevengoldstein114 Your word salad means nothing to me. In MY market I can evict for cause in a week. In MY market I don't have to justify non-renewal of a lease.
@robgrey6183 well looks like you are writing more fiction, since we have no evidence or sword affidavits under penalties of perjury here. Too much fiction.
Robgrey believes that by intimidating and making claims here are facts, they are only opinions . Well looks like you are writing more fiction, since we have no evidence or sworn affidavits under penalties of perjury here. Too much fiction.
I have one cottage i have rented several times. The last 2 were bad being the last one was the worst.
I have people begging me to do so…..I WILL NEVER RENT IT AGAIN.. EVER. Thanks NY🖕🏻
Why is anyone a landlord in New York?
That’s exactly what I thought, why would anyone wanna be a landlord anywhere? The shit going on in this country needs to be stopped, I only hope we’re not past the point of no return.
Atlanta still got my back as a landlord. You WILL be evicted in about 2-3 months
It's a mistake. I know. I did it.
NYC tenants go years without paying rent before landlords may evict.
Im in it now. Rome NY. Tenants stop paying me. Been in and out of court for almost a year. Trying to get them out. I live in the same house. The court gave them a free lawyer. Im done after this. Ill never rent that apartment again. Im gonna sell the rental properties. I have a good tenant in my other house. Shes paying way under market rate. Shes been a good tenant for 10 years. After i sell the houses. Who knows what someone else will do. No way in hell im staying in this landlord game. The government and these piece of shit tenants have caused me an incredible amount of stress. Im an industrial mechanic in a factory. I work tons of hours. Breaking my back. I dont have time for bullshit. Im a 100 percent a great landlord. Its not worth it.
You know what else? These piece of shit tenants stopped paying me. While I dumped almost $20,000 in the septic system. The government doesn't care. The tenants don't care. Never again.
But the City's housing authority is evicting tenants at a higher rate than ever. So the city can evict but individual landlords can't.
Same old Democrat "rules for thee but not for me"
@jcoolman4854 wrong the report showed private managed public housing is evicting more than public managed housing, get the news correct.
You never read the report. Private managed public housing is doing most of the evicting, not public managed public housing. Get it accurate.
@stevengoldstein114 As long as it has "public" in it. No comment.
@jcoolman4854 when the private property managers took control over public housing, in the 1970s, they made false promises. Then all the properties they managed died. It was a planned attack. Then the private housing sector promised good housing, and then why so many new laws to protect customers?
I have a 2 family home in NY. Currently have a great tenant. However, if and when she ever decides to move on, my plan is to convert the entire home into a duplex. Renting your propeert in NY is not worth it.
The Empire State is now the Nanny State. Sad.
yeah
Same in California, chasing out the old-time landlords.
Good tenants want to live next to good tenants. When bad tenants are untouchable the neighborhood declines.
We have a 3 family in Connecticut and rent to no one our sons live with us on the other 2 floors. We lived here over 35 years and had a few renters do thousands in damage even with us living in the building so we stopped renting.
the other problem is that if th landlord is not able to get rid of bad tenants. then the bad tenants can make life bad forr the good tenants. to the point that good tenants will move. leaving nothing but bad tenants. in which it can cost the landlord money. cause all good tenants will look at the building and think no way i'm moving in this place with th bad tenants that the landlord is renting to.
We almost have that. Gal upstairs smokes a lot of pot and makes noise.
Fortunately I live in the back
@georgewagner7787 is it unlawful to smoke pot in NY ? And is the whole building listed as non smoking? It also appears that if smoking is allowed only in units, and that is happening, then there is no legal issue.
Thank you for helping bring attention to the problem. The GCE will have far reaching damage. I was limited in my response d/t length. The other huge fact is landlords who have owned their properties for decades and can afford to keep rent below Fair market rent will be penalized if they don't raise rent to FMR. When they go to sell, buyers knowing that the tenants and rent cost is grandfathered in. So if I charge $1000/flat but market rent is $1600 my potential buyer won't pay full value because there is no means to increase the rent except 5% + CPI.
Thus unless I raise rents now to market which for some tenants will be $600, I will damaging my business.
NY Landlord Tenant laws are out of control. It's so unfair to landlords.
I like the new law.
The example of evicting a tenant because they looked at your wife in a "disrespectful" manner was awful. 😂
He uses that often. Maybe it happened. Not a look but something
I've kicked out a prospective tenant during a unit showing because they almost immediately started making threatening and incredibly disrespectful comments towards other people viewing the apartment and towards me when I refused to budge and demanded he submit written application and go through screening because I wasn't just going to hand him the keys based on his good-ol-boy story. The guy was also clearly drunk at the showing (and drove himself there).
Sure its a potentially fuzzy line what behavior might be considered disrespectful or funny but seems to me if you are trying to qualify for a new apartment, you are on your best behavior. Showing up drunk or high, making inappropriate or threatening statements, getting overtly political or reli***us, demanding preferential terms or to skip screening (trying to haggle is one thing but being aggressive about it and refusing to accept it if owner/agent won't budge is another), messing with, damaging, or trying to take current tenants stuff if occupied, etc. None of that is a good look and is more than enough in most landlord's POV for skipping that applicant and moving on to the next one. (Note I've had every one of these examples happen to me when I self-managed my properties. Part of the reason I went to Property management is the people who try this kind of thing generally KNOW they are terrible tenants and are trying to push their way in via intimidation. This is much less likely with a good PM.)
No it isn't. Have respect.
"Good Cause" makes no sense, a lease should end when it ends. I do not recommend investing in areas with such laws, but to the ones that have no choice, it is important, vital, to have a good strong lease, because it is almost a certainty that tenants violate the lease in some way, and those violations do amount to good cause for eviction. Even if a property owner isn't in such a draconian area, a strong lease is still important. But I see so many property owners with a lease that is just five or six pages long, and I can assure them, that those leases are inadequate. I'm in Texas, a supposedly "landlord friendly" state, and my lease, when including addendums and house rules, is over 20 pages, and covers everything from when the refuse receptacles must be removed from curb side, to the presence of lithium batteries (cell phones, tablets, children's toys and ev/hybrid vehicles), even the rent due date. Any one violation is not enough for eviction, because a judge would likely order the tenant to cure the default (like put away the trash can in accordance to the lease) and consider the matter resolved. But if the tenant breaches the lease, then does it again, then does it again, and the landlord documented each violation and informed the tenant each time with a notice of default, then this repeat behavior is enough for the property owner to prove that the tenant has no intention of following the terms of the lease and needs to be evicted. If rent is a day late, that is a breach of the lease. Doesn't matter if it's not late enough to trigger a late fee, the due date is what is stated in the lease, and any day after is a breach of the lease, and if done frequently enough, is cause for eviction, so long as the property owner issued the notice each time. Please, have a good strong lease everyone, and document and send notice with each violation. Even if it's a good tenant, if the tenant is not following the lease, I've found that a notice of default tends to get the tenant (good ones at least) to change their behavior for the better.
I like your lease is spelled out in plain language. Tenant signed off and agree to the terms.
What lease is there here? Since so many state laws makes one universal lease agreement impossible. I don't understand this whole thing because of it. And again criticizing law is not a defense from making mistakes you must be held accountable. Or worse violations of building codes and customer protection laws.
@@stevengoldstein114, I'm just stating the obvious, eviction is only possible with good cause, and if the lease is a good lease, then the tenant is probably violating the lease in some way and providing the property owner with the good cause needed to evict. It all starts with a good lease, and then the property owner can sift through the lease, identify the violations, and begin the eviction process
We also use what I call a "kitchen sink lease"; it includes everything, including the kitchen sink.
@@vivillager let’s ignore clueless Steve.
It’s not a good idea to put a judge in the middle of all this. Courts are already backed up. Landlords are going to have to waste time and money on lawyers. I doubt if judges really care about making the right decisions. They are just going to do whatever looks good at the moment, which is ruling in favor of the tenant almost all the time. It’s not their money. Landlord can deal with it. All this is going to make landlords disappear and rents go up.
Judges are required to be unbiased and follow rules of evidence, civil procedures, and the law. Simple as that
@@stevengoldstein114 we all know "requiring" something is no guarantee of making it true. All tenants are required to pay their rent on time, for example. You are constantly railing against the few bad landlords out there, despite myriad laws requiring them to behave better. You expect all landlords to damage their business in futhering of more tenant protections instead of altering their business models to protect themselves.
Another example, In my city prosecutors are actually boycotting a particular city judge who was appointed during our far left council phase as that judge is known for always finding criminal cases not guilty no matter how clear cut the evidence was. Now all this judge sees is parking enforcement cases.
@madderscience all this ranting and story telling. You cannot just say your opinions and expect them to be considered evidence. This is the same old song and dance.
@@stevengoldstein114 you need to work on some new comebacks if you are going to accuse me of same old same old.
Let me tell you guys something else. I called 7 lawyers. To handle my eviction. All but one of them took my case. The others said they stopped doing evictions. Because its an enormous pain in the ass.
And bad landlords are being rewarded and good tenants being punished goes both ways
Every democratic politician in New York State from the governor on down to lowly council members try to make a name for themselves with tenant protections. New York tenants are over protected with laws and regulations. Tenant advocacy groups never stop complaining, and the courts are overwhelmed. Tenant advocacy groups basically own democratic politicians. As a small landlord, it's sickening.
New York has become the "free housing" state.
I emailed my Council person...she is a Democrat I know I will get back a standard gaslighting nice email back........but I wanted it in writing that my sister is a senior citizen with severe health issues and she has a professional tenant.. and the repercussions to her health and finances....and the family who is now helping pay lawyers fees............my family are former police, teachers and firemen......not wealthy people hard working...We worked for our homes.
In alameda ca. we have good cause eviction, the tenants might as well own their apartment!
Same boat. Going through one now. We only have 7 units half of em are bad
Rochester NY just fell (got infected with Good Cause legislation). Syracuse and Buffalo to follow. They are also abandoning the "10 units or more" trope. They all are adopting more than ONE unit you are a "large landlord"
They are greedy monsters.
I hear living in your car is cozy.
The communist way. That's all they want well expect for themselves.
Government is too involved in daily life. Seems everywhere that can stick their grubby hands in, they have. No remorse. No repentance. Just get in it an see if they can receive a gain in some way from it.
Thanks for the breakdown! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
Bro there are 1,000s of TERRIBLE LANDLORDS THATs why we need the protections and to think its idiotic is exactly why we need the law.
Landlords forget one simple aspect that lease is a "Busines agreement." The tenant is not a subordinate they are an agreement Business partner. The laws protect businesses' interests . The tenant is a Business representative. Imaging buying a home and the landlord is a supreme ass and just decides to bot renew the lease? Thats insane to even assume you should have the power. The expectation of renting is never assumed to be short term . So thats crazy to evict them after a year or paying rent because of your feelings. Lol 😅😅😅😅😅
The laws are heavy on the tenants side...tenants also get free lawyers....the law is so much on the tenants side that a child can represent in court............These laws should not be the same for a building and a small 2 family or a Brownstone in Brooklyn......These laws were written to squeeze the middle class....buildings can afford to lose rent....and have more for lawyers..........there are PROFESSIONAL tenants that so this...over and over...and stay months even a year or two..... these types target older people with a 2 family..Imagine going through that...and I know of people in that situation and the people are selling drugs....
@CynthiaBiel All of that May be true , but that is a truth in all aspects of every business. However when it comes to "Homes " sorry but save the drama. You are dealing with people who are looking for "for ever " or close to you and you Decided to represent that need and fulfilled it. Imagine saying that its hard for a landlord as it tenants are some secondary to the process when their the primary, without them you have no income or business. To get into business to sell homes no you should not have the ability to govern if they can stay or go based on how you feel. Nothing in your agreement states you have to like them or even be friends. Do you realize how Insanely terrible landlords because of their "feelings " about everything. I have see 100's of full families on the streets in the cold of winter with their kids in the friggin snow.. landlords that are not controlled are a nuisance to a family. My last landlord threatened me , out dead rats in front of my door.. had many many dudes stand in my driveway to intimated me when coming home.. they have their family's members pull guns on my lil nephew family and friends... see when the owner passed away she didnt leave the house to her oldest son... he hated me so for 13 years he terroirized my entire family. I avoided going to cour to no have my public record damaged whike I'm seeking new property. Boom god bless me i finally found one after 5 years with my 2 dogs...
7 months after moving in the management has tried to extort extra $500.. has bought 2 fraudlent cases against me when i refused to pay them extra $500 on top of our agreement for rent.. then threatened to have any gove assistance removed . Ao they called hra and claimed that I was on drugs ( never did any in my entire life) and they started a c.a.s.a againsts me.. save me the poor landlord defense. Time after time landord assumes tenants are subordinates in service to them and has to do what they say and we don't. You're not selling socks its homes. If you treated the tenants like the business partner they are you would avoid most issues but nope.
By the way, RUclips is starting a massive change to prohibit clickbaiting. Which is something Tony has been doing for years. Maybe he will be forced to stop making videos about unproven or worse very fake interpretations of REAL NEWS.
its been nice knowing you.
@madderscience but I am not clickbaiting. So are you saying Tony is leaving?
You are funny!!
@@stevengoldstein114 admit it you
Wah
Madderscience constantly clams that judges are unfair to landlords and in a recent rant also said they are biased toward criminals. Remember the US Constitution says it is assumed innocent before proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. And that rules and chains of evidence and criminal procedures must be followed. This is why the challenge results in 10 guilty men free for 1 innocent to be convicted.
where is your evidence? You should be very careful about engaging in personal defamation.
Face it the landlords will all leave based on your advice. Since you have no evidence of who are the good landlords or bad ones, AND that with your own evidence, you select bad tenants all the time. At best your process does not work because you have no records of proven true positive selection, true negative selection and most importantly no false positive selection and false negative selection.
Positive selection starts with the State and market in which you invest your equity.
Investors with options are moving out of markets where the deck is stacked against them.
@robgrey6183 You are not addressing the landlord responsibility or the lack of evidence to support any selection process that results in inevitable desperate impact housing discrimination. Which is illegal.
To prove disparate impact discrimination in housing, you need to demonstrate that a seemingly neutral housing policy or practice has a disproportionate negative effect on a protected group, such as people of a certain race, ethnicity, or familial status, without a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the disparity, essentially showing that the policy's outcome, not necessarily its intent, is discriminatory; this is usually done through statistical analysis comparing the impact of the policy on different groups
@@stevengoldstein114 Your word salad means nothing to me. In MY market I can evict for cause in a week.
In MY market I don't have to justify non-renewal of a lease.
@robgrey6183 well looks like you are writing more fiction, since we have no evidence or sword affidavits under penalties of perjury here. Too much fiction.
I'm having Rumsfield flashbacks here.
This is a rerun
Yeah no it's not, doofus.
Oldie, but goodie.
Robgrey believes that by intimidating and making claims here are facts, they are only opinions . Well looks like you are writing more fiction, since we have no evidence or sworn affidavits under penalties of perjury here. Too much fiction.