Crescent symbol of Islam | Allama Iqbal letter | Khurram Ali Shafique

Crescent is universally regarded as a symbol of Islam but was not so during the times of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and his companions, should the symbol therefore be regarded as a deviation? Iqbal received this query in 1916 and wrote a very interesting reply, which is being shared in this video, based on the book "Iqbal Ka Rasta" by Khurram Ali Shafique, three times recipient of the Presidential Iqbal Award.
The video has been sponsored by Allied Marketing Pvt (Ltd) Pakistan in celebration of their 125th anniversary.

[@syedfasih74]

Thanks for sharing such valuable information

[@KhurramsDesk]

Thanks

[@barkhiasworld2983]

Thank you for clearing our minds of all doubts, Sir.

[@KhurramsDesk]

Thanks

[@quote4every1]

It is very unfortunate that we often regard Iqbal as just an Islamic poet. In reality, he is one of the greatest philosophers of all time. I believe he was more of a reader and researcher than merely a writer and poet.

[@KhurramsDesk]

Thanks

[@TheNqa]

Really important information! We must know about Iqbal’s worlldview to comprehend his method of reasoning as he is the best interpreter of Islam in modern times according to Quad i Azam, M.A. Jinnah.

[@KhurramsDesk]

Thanks

[@synergyplus]

Great can you kindly share this quote of Quaid e Azam

[@KhurramsDesk]

@@synergyplus Thanks for asking. You will find that quote in this video: ruclips.net/video/8AoME-G0-xo/видео.html&t

[@SyedaQudsiyaMashhadi]

Beautiful video. It is true that Ijma of Ummah has never been on evil. It's only the Kharijites who leave the fold of Ummah and apply those verses/injunctions of the Quran on Muslims that were meant for non-believers.

[@KhurramsDesk]

Thanks :)

[@aarifboy]

Aaj tak tau Ummat ne saarey Ijmaa 'ghalat' hee kiye hain. Photos na lene ka Ijmaa bhi 'ghalat', loudspeaker na use kerne ka Ijmaa bhi 'ghalat' aur phir printing press ko na use kerne ka Ijmaa bhi 'ghalat' 🥲

[@KhurramsDesk]

Thanks for your comment but the instances which you have mentioned were not ijma from Iqbal's point of view presented in this video :). It is very interesting (and helpful) that you have mentioned "ummat kay ijma". This video is part of a series which will show us that Iqbal wanted us to differentiate between the ijmas of the ummat, which cannot be wrong, and the ijmas of ulema which have often been wrong since the end of the World War I, i.e. in the last hundred years.

[@aarifboy]

Ijmaas of Ulema were accepted by Ummat and thus became Ijmaas of Ummat, so no difference between two. With time Ummat will leave all of Ijmaas one by one, bcoz all r 'wrong', just wait n watch haha

[@RaaziaAttique]

@@aarifboyI think your limited mind is keeping ummat term to Pakistani nation. It is much greater than that.

[@aarifboy]

@@RaaziaAttique People of Pak never did any Ijmaa, people in Pak r not free to do these things, Pak people just follow the Ijmaas done by Ummat, especially S Arabia n 'Iran', although those two r also no longer free. Only free person is me, n 'bound' followers like u wont like my comments thus lol.

[@braveheart8318]

The so-called ijmah were done by the "imams" Christian, jahudi and Zoroastrian converts. They managed to get higher positions in the court of Abbasi kings and created fake history, sunnah, and hadith to destroy islam from within by revolting against bani ummayah's Arab rule over Persia. The so-called pillars are nothing but majusi and yahudi rituals incorporated in Islam whom everyone is following blindly for the last 12 centuries.