Scarpa Ribelle Tech 2.0 Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 апр 2022
- Finally, a super in depth review of the Scarpa Ribelle Tech 2.0. I absolutely love this boot. Though it's not perfect, I highly recommend it.
If you enjoyed the video, please consider subscribing!
Be safe in the mountains
For Inquiries - teatimeinthealpine@gmail.com 
Спорт
The perfect summertime Alps boot. Climbed the Matterhorn (via Hornli), Dent du Geant, Breithorn traverse, Aiguilles Marbrees traverse, Aiguilles de Rochefort and the Weisshorn with these. They pair up very well with the Petzl Irvis Hybrid crampon for a very efficient F&L set-up. They do take some time to dry out due to the "gaiter". Great review!!
That’s awesome! These boots are awesome! Thank you for watching!!
Awesome vid man. Looking into my first mountaineering boots and heavily considering some Scarpas
Thanks for the thorough review! I picked up a pair after watching and really enjoyed them on their maiden voyage up a couloir here in Colorado this morning.
Heck yeah! That’s super awesome to hear!! Thank you for watching😁
Always inspiring your reviews, because I feel to have made similar experiences.
Hope your shoulder recovered completely Taylor. See you some day! 🙋🏻♂️
My shoulder is great! Thanks for watching brother!
Would like to see a head to head with the la sportiva aequilibrium st
thank you for this, looking at the ribelle hd has maybe a less sock grabby top
It does, and I think both options are great and depending on the user one will like one or the other more. I personally don't mind the sock like top. The ribelle tech is a much more capable boot then the ribelle HD as well, so that is something to consider.
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 again thank you i'll research both some more
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 When you say "much more capable", does that mean that its intended use is for more complicated terrain, or ? Is the Ribelle Tech more stiff than Ribelle HD for example ? Or is it just more insulated ? Thanks.
I'm wondering how these would perform as a winter hiking boot. Not really for mountaineering, but hiking on flat and/or on steep trails up mountains (3000m) in Canadian Rockie, In below freezing temps.
My winter boots aren't ideal for hiking. My backpacking boots are not big enough to wear a liner and a regular wool sock on top, so i need a dedicated winter hiking boot, that's a B2 for the times i do need crampons
Excellent review. I mostly hike but lately am getting into mountaineering and plan to hike Cotopaxi but also complete TMB. lol Do you think these would be appropriate for both? Thanks.
Thank you! The ribelle tech on certain days may be adequate for Cotopaxi. However, most people would steer you away and so would I. If you were moving super fast and are a very experienced climber, you could probably get away with it. For comfort reasons, I’d recommend something like the Mont Blanc or Nepal evo/cube on a warm day. On a cold day, something like the Scarpa phantom 6000 or the la sportiva G2. If I were to do it, I’d wear the Scarpa phantom tech, or la sportiva g5 evo because they split the lightweight and warmth category perfectly. As far as the TMB goes, the ribelle will be overkill. Some people wear hiking boots and some people wear trail runners. Boots are a safe bet. Though, I only wear boots on mountains. If I’m hiking, Sunshine, rain, or snow, I’ll be in trail runners.
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 : Thank you and no I do not move fast.
@@annas.5794 depending on your comfort weather, I’d recommend trail runners or hiking boots on the trail. Something like the la sportiva g5 evo, or the Scarpa phantom tech for Ecuador. If you plan on doing colder 6k peaks something, you could future proof and get a 6k boot now that would work in Ecuador. Something like the Scarpa phantom 6000 or the la sportiva g2 evo. And people will be wearing typical single boots on the mountain too. Such as the Scarpa Mont Blanc and the la sportiva nepal evo/cube. Depends on if your feet run cold, and if you are climbing in cold temps. If you aren’t going to be doing bigger mountains, the Scarpa phantom tech and la sportiva g5 evo are both really good boots that are also super light.
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 : Thank you on your recommendations. I use Altras mostly for hiking and they are great, not the best due to the grip being not the best, but the best I have found so far. I will look into Scarpa phantom tech for Cotopaxi and Chemborazee and these type of hikes. Thanks again. Keep your posts going :-)
@@annas.5794 Altras are great! That’s all I use. Good luck!!
Great review, really considering these boots as an all in one boot for Munro bagging in the Scottish highlands in autumn and winter. Would you recommend these in terms of comfort? Thanks
They are the most comfortable boot I’ve found!
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 brilliant! Thanks for the reply think I’m totally sold on them and will most definitely be getting a pair!
Ordered a pair, coming on mon and getting tried out on a couple of munros on tues, thanks for the advice mate!
@@robertmurray1978 how did you get on?
@@milco8755 I had to send them back, let water in massively so got them tested by the mountain boot company and they found a manufacturer fault so I exchanged them for a pair of manta pro for winter and got a pair of Mescalito trk for spring/summer, great boots both of them and great after sales care from scarpa!
Which Lowa boots did you show? Currently own the older Mont Blancs that I use for winter ice climbing, but I need a light 3 season mountaineering boot and considering either the Ribelle Tech or the Lowa Cadin II Mid.
Those are the alpine expert boots. I love Lowa but would recommend the ribelle tech over the Cardin II. Durability issues.
Have you ever felt this Ribelle Tech 2.0 digging into your foot (from the top) when you flex them ? I have tried Ribelle Lite HD (should be a bit softer than Tech) and had to return them for that reason. They flexed at a weird spot (further from the toe and slightly on the inner side) and every time I put some weight on the toe I could see a crease which dug into the feet from the top. When you tried flex test I could see a very similar flex point/crease so I wonder if you can feel something on these too. Not sure if they were simply too wide for me or it's some weird design flaw. Thanks. Very nice review btw.
I never felt that! But, is it at all possible that those boots were too small? I have felt that with other boots when they were too small or tied too tight. It's to the point where they were leaving bruises on the top of my feet for at least a week! Horrible!
Hi! Thanks for this video. I have a question regarding Scarpa boot’s specifically, in case you know the answer: How does the sizing on the Mont Blanc Pro compare to the Phantom 8000 and/or Phantom 6000? I have the Mont Blanc Pro in size 47.0.
Almost identical! If the 47 works for you, i'd recommend a 47 or potentially a 48. Your feet will swell and enlarge if you are on extended expeditions. I've seen it first hand, where it's actually taken multiple people to remove a climbers boots!
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 Awesome. Thank you for your response and input!
Hey there. Great review. Can you give me an advise about the size I should go for?. I mean, for how much should size up from a regular shoes size?. I always struggle with mondo point measurement as I'm not sure whether 1cm or above should be fine. And what do you think about using them in Spanish Pyrenees in summer mountaineering?. Could they be too warm for our climate? Much appreciated your feedback.
Sure! What’s your current shoe size?
@@teatimeinthealpine5752. Thanks. That's a bit of the problem as I usually wear bettwen 9 and 9.5 UK depending on the brand (e. g. Adidas) while with trail running shoes I usually go up to 10UK but not always.
I have a pair of Scarpa Phantom Tech in 9.5UK (44 EU) and I feel that it may be a bit tight but since I only use them in winter I feel the foot doesn't expand as it can do in summer. Also i have got a Montura Vertigo GTX 10UK that are fine but then I've got hotpots in some areas and blisters in my heels; and really sweated feet in summer.
@@mattwild4175 That makes sense. The EU 44 is a 9-9.5 UK. Scarpa tends to run a half size smaller then the La Sportiva, and other brands. I wear a 49 Scarpa and a 48 La Sportiva. You always want to size up in a mountain boot. For the foot swell, but also for descending. You don't want your feet smashing into the toe box. Also consider kicking steps or ice climbing. It can brutal in too small of boots. I have found a full size up to be necessary for me. I can mitigate the fit with the laces that way, and never have to worry about it being too small. An EU 45 would be on the large side of a UK 10. If you are a 9-9.5, the 45 in theory, should be the perfect boot!
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 much appreciated 👌🏻☺️
Hey, thank you for this review. Do you thing these boot, with better insultation in this model, are suitable for winter? I am not talking about some 6000+ peaks, but something like ~3000 in winter with lots of snow or non-winter Mont Blanc ? Also, do you thing they compare to Zamberlan 2093 Brenva GTX RR?
I think they would work for Mont Blanc on a nice day during peak climbing season. I’m not sure I’d recommend them as a winter boot for 3,000+ meter peaks. You’d have to move fast and opt for ideal weather days.
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 hey, thanks so much for your reply. After all I went for Zamberlan Expert Pro and I am very happy with them. I think they are a bit warmer.
Ribelle vs Ribelle Lite vs Ribelle HD 2.0??? Any thoights?
Hello.. What will be the minimum temperature on the Ribelle? wonder if they could work for Scottish winter mountaineering or climbing Mont Blanc or higher than 4000 mts.. thanks
Hey. I’ve worn them several times on peaks over 4000 meters. It really depends on the conditions. I had great conditions and was moderately cold during breaks. These certainly wouldn’t be my only boot if I was frequenting mountains over 4000 meters. Hence why they are not. They come out on great weather days where the temps are over 10F and sun is forecasted.
Is it possible to remove the innersoles in the Scarpa Ribelle Tech 2.0 so that I can switch them by my orthopedic innersoles?
Yup! Almost all mountain boots have removable soles. Certainly to replace, but also to dry out at camp!
what kind of socks do you wear? I wear nice Smartwool compression mountaineering socks, I'd all but guarantee they won't get pulled down. But not that I've tried these boots yet.
I wear several different socks. But, I usually lean towards Darn Tough. I'd LOVE to give those socks a shot though. I'll get some and give them a shot this weekend! Thanks for the rec!
Out of interest, if the Ribelle has 200g of insulation, the Mont Blanc 400g, what would the Phantom 6000 be in terms of insulation weight?
I have looked everywhere, sometimes it's difficult to find Scarpa's insulation information. I used to have the Phantom 6000 but don't remember what the insulation amount was, or if I ever knew. Ha! Thanks for watching!
i know it's very individual but still will ask this question: what size of Scarpa Ribelle Tech 2.0. would be the best for regular USA 10 / EU 43 size person: should i grab 10.5/44 or 11/44.5 ?
No option to check size in local store, currently only online from other country (possible to return, but would like to avoid that).
Like you said, hard to say. If you have a lot of toe box room in your size 10 shoes, you may be able to get away with a 44. If you don’t, I’d go a full size up.
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 thanks for response (and review).
For a 8 hours trek in wet snow which is better the mont blanc or the ribelle ?
I’d go with the ribelle.
Would you recommend these for winter mountaineering (4000+ peaks)? Ive read mixed reviews of people claiming that they're not waterproof
winter not sure , but summer 4000+ all was ok
Opinion on Scarpa manta VS and Ribille
The Scarpa Manta is less mountain, more hike. Completely capable of both, but would be out of place Ice climbing, and may not be the best choice if you’re looking for a warm-ish mountaineering boot for a lot of snow/ice walking with crampons on. The ribelle tech is is more mountain, less hike. Though also capable of both. I wouldn’t want to hike long distances in them, but I would be very comfortable climbing ice with the minimal flexibility. Great mountaineering boot and fairly warm considering. To fine tune my answer, what mountains are you looking to climb?
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 Thanks for info, Climbing Harding ice filed my asolo fell apart so , for 10 hours I was basically hiking it barefoot. NO fun. Looking for more dependable boots as my La sportivas boots are to narrow and hurts after awhile. Headed to Katahdin in October. Thinking Manta Tech or Ribille. Also Looked into hangwags but don’t know much about that brand. Just having a hard time finding a boots as the area I live in ,no one carries a good set a boots that I can try on in the store.
@@NBay_ if you’re going to be walking on ice/snow primarily, especially with crampons on. I would certainly get the ribelle tech. Also, they are much wider then the sportivas!
How warm are they compared to the Mont Blanc ?
The Mont Blanc is warmer. Arguably, the wider toe box on the ribelle tech 2.0 makes it easier to toe dance and the difference is null. I have wide feet so this made a huge difference to me. If you have narrow feet, the Mont Blanc will feel much warmer.
I’m planning on climbing Mont Blanc in sep this year ….and can’t decide between the scarpa ribble tec 2 or the La sportiva Nepal cube
@@snorbie awesome! It depends on your feet! If you have wide feet, I’d go with the Scarpa ribelle tech 2.0 or the Scarpa Mont Blanc. If you have narrow feet I would go with the La Sportiva product. Deciding whether to wear the Mont Blanc or the Ribelle Tech more or less depends on how fast you move. Ever since I got the Ribelle tech, I stopped wearing the Mont Blanc entirely. I sweated way too much. But I try to move fast, pack light, and cover a lot of miles in a day. I was happy in the Ribelle Tech down to -5 degrees Fahrenheit . If you plan on taking lots of breaks and taking your time, I’d opt for the Mont Blanc.
How do these compare to the Scarpa Charmox?
There is a place for both boots. I love the charmoz for fast single day endeavors. They are not insulated. The ribelle can certainly do more, and is much warmer. The ribelle is also a wider fitting boot.
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 Thanks for the info, that’s exactly what I need to know.
And also Ribelle techs lace tensioner SUCKS it’s so small and flimsy it’s such a joke.
That’s interesting! I have never had an issue. Thank you for the comment. I’m curious if others have had an issue.
@@teatimeinthealpine5752 I’ve posted this issue elsewhere and gotten multiple replies confirming others having the same problem
@@user-nw2si7hu3u Awesome! Thank you for the added information!
I have Size 46 in SCARPA Men's Charmoz HD Waterproof Boots which are known to be small. I wear normal size 11 shoes. For Ribelle Tech 2.0 should I get 45 or 46 is it known to be small ?
Well, a 46 usually translates to a US12. I would recommend sizing up 1 size from your street shoe. So, a 46 should be perfect. They have a decently wide toe, which is awesome. A 46 should be perfect.