Vertical Aerospace vs Lilium, Joby & Archer 🚁 Which eVTOL Is Better? SPAC Merger eVTOL Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024

Комментарии • 57

  • @FGain
    @FGain  3 года назад +3

    eVTOL Playlist ruclips.net/p/PLHfrGGnUZnJ272uueXK5_hRngmKcbx5wz
    AST SpaceMobile Playlist ruclips.net/p/PLHfrGGnUZnJ106f84_mu3RFnBzpTMCot_
    Select eVTOL videos:
    🚁 Lilium vs Joby Which Electric Jet Quieter? ruclips.net/video/3rpzgwDsdOI/видео.html
    🚁 Ultimate eVTOL Comparison: ruclips.net/video/IbIY1f05OrY/видео.html
    🚁 Lilium vs Joby vs Archer | Which eVTOL Is Better ruclips.net/video/OWx_Ea2s7us/видео.html
    🚁 Vertical Aerospace vs Lilium, Joby & Archer. Which Is Better? ruclips.net/video/YyYmluyB0nU/видео.html
    🚁 Joby Aviation (JOBY) vs. Archer (ACHR) ruclips.net/video/5kBecB3l3jo/видео.html
    🚁 Lilium Jet Architecture, Engineering, Ducted Fan ruclips.net/video/k3UbgqM-srU/видео.html
    🚁 Lilium Capital Markets Day - Part 1 ruclips.net/video/uAzQJ2OzO8I/видео.html
    🚁 Lilium’s Inaugural Analyst Day Webcast ruclips.net/video/dvLXCLcYyb0/видео.html
    🚁 Lilium 7-Seater Cabin Unveil. Evolution of Lilium Jets ruclips.net/video/d3eYyfXnl3c/видео.html
    🚁 Joby - Things To Know Before Merger Day ruclips.net/video/Xz_k73WqoQE/видео.html
    🚁 Joby Longest eVTOL Flight 154.6 Miles In 1 Hour 17 Minutes ruclips.net/video/98Qmx7-iImY/видео.html
    🚁 Joby Aviation Analyst Day June 2021 ruclips.net/video/BI98MctsJFc/видео.html
    🚁 Joby Aviation Company Overview ruclips.net/video/Czqz7F-ccH8/видео.html
    🚁 EHang Earnings Call Q1/Q2 2021 ruclips.net/video/MEdm0dSz72U/видео.html
    🚁 EHang (EH216) Completes First Trial Flight Over South China Sea ruclips.net/video/GdZR0bBD-wM/видео.html
    🚁 Archer Aviation Unveil Event Highlights ruclips.net/video/9Gf98XTSsv4/видео.html
    🚁 VoloConnect by Volocopter - Extended Urban Transport ruclips.net/video/3SZqYcBsYZs/видео.html
    🚁 Electric Flying Racing Car Airspeeder MK3 EXA Series ruclips.net/video/ZMrJObbr1xQ/видео.html
    🚁 VoloCity Air Taxi Design by Volocopter ruclips.net/video/5lY4RYgbjbw/видео.html
    🚁 Volocopter Autonomous Urban Air Taxi Test Flight ruclips.net/video/MQTxh462Ac0/видео.html
    🚁 Vahana & CityAirbus Airbus’ eVTOL ruclips.net/video/Kq5hjiNrlww/видео.html

  • @pvsnrj
    @pvsnrj 3 года назад +3

    Excellent data presentation and it is a great state of the art information on EVTOL. Please keep it a regular program sir with quarterly updates.

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +1

      Thank you for the kind words. I will most certainly continue reviewing eVTOLs.
      I have many more videos on eVTOLs, including updated comparisons. Here is the playlist ruclips.net/p/PLHfrGGnUZnJ272uueXK5_hRngmKcbx5wz.
      Thanks for watching and commenting!

  • @michaelisaacson9735
    @michaelisaacson9735 3 года назад +8

    Lilium's 6 +1 passenger capability speaks the best to me as far as the air-taxi business model goes. Price for a ride will be the determining factor for B2B and an aircraft that can carry more people will have the better chance of being full for more flights due to lower fares. It looks like Lilium intends to roll out a 16-passenger model that take up nearly no more footprint space than does the seven-seater. Can Joby manage that? The extra 50mph of cruising speed won't overcome a Lilium ride at 78% of that velocity at half the cost when the flight already represents maybe 20% of the ground taxi travel time.

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +2

      Yes, Lilium's unit economics would arguably be better then the rest of the eVTOL currently in development.
      Thanks for watching!

    • @ckdigitaltheqof6th210
      @ckdigitaltheqof6th210 2 года назад +3

      Lilium is by far the most appealing look, holds up to 6 passengers & pilot, but their compromise vs sound polution, resulted in too many heavy small engines, using a single row & diameter blades per engine, made it very slow, more drag, running like a 'verticle glider,' which contradicts the flight craft concept use. Heh, why not add a chamber of mini afterburner fuel pipes, for high altitude and distance flight.

    • @michaelisaacson9735
      @michaelisaacson9735 2 года назад +2

      @@ckdigitaltheqof6th210 No, no, no! Lilium, you have it all backwards! Ducted fans are 40% more efficient than open propellers. That allows the use of smaller, lighter motors that contribute less drag. Lilium's motors are also in-line, so again, lower drag and the airflow across the wing increases lift, though only a small amount. As far as noise goes, ducted fans produce less of it mostly because the noise is in-line with the motors, not radiating in all directions. The smaller ducted fans do produce much higher frequencies than does the Joby aircraft but high frequencies do not travel far, low ones do, and that's what the Joby produces. Lastly, the overall drag on the LIlium is less due to the thrust vectoring, which can control the craft in cruse without control surfaces, which work by adding drag. Both designs fly and both can be viable, but in the world of passenger transport, which is the ONLY business case for these at this point, Lilium wins.

    • @ckdigitaltheqof6th210
      @ckdigitaltheqof6th210 2 года назад +1

      @@michaelisaacson9735 🙄 ...😏well we would definatly like to be asured of that, since other have posted a differing perfomance status, then again, ironically its exactly what your also saying about this product. compared.

  • @henningfriedrich4243
    @henningfriedrich4243 3 года назад +5

    Great content , hight appreciated !

  • @IsaaxTeddy
    @IsaaxTeddy 2 года назад +3

    i am going to bet on lilium, biggest capacity of passenger, heck i can even vision itself taking over short haul hopping journeys for off shore oil drill platforms, search and rescue, paramedic/fire/police, island hopping or sightseeing tours. The problem is range, as 280km is a bit too short for my opinion, a go and back radius of 500km (single straight journey 1000+ km)

  • @ckdigitaltheqof6th210
    @ckdigitaltheqof6th210 2 года назад +1

    At 02:00 , the debate with Wisky & Archer, both need modifications with the rear propellers of the main wings, eighter use a reverse dimention position of the front wing engines&blade with a close to blades neck pivit, (avoiding short ground blade height) - or - during horizontal fly, revert the rear blades angle pitch switched, turn 90° and turn back on. This will increase velocity of horizontal travel across lands.

  • @bluenova5599
    @bluenova5599 3 года назад +8

    Joby on top

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +2

      I tend to agree. However, I believe Lilium is not too far behind. Thanks for watching!

    • @bluenova5599
      @bluenova5599 3 года назад

      @@FGain no lok

    • @ruipedrooliveira4677
      @ruipedrooliveira4677 3 года назад +1

      Yes and the money will help but have in consideration that others have started way later, it’s very soon to pick winners

  • @RyanJosephLong
    @RyanJosephLong 3 года назад +1

    Thank you for this very comprehensive video!!!

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад

      You are very welcome. Thanks for watching and commenting, Ryan.
      You may also like the comprehensive eVTOL comparison videosI recently made. Part 1 ruclips.net/video/IbIY1f05OrY/видео.html
      Part 2 ruclips.net/video/YFuUEt5FZSw/видео.html

  • @Edb4paxUSMC
    @Edb4paxUSMC Год назад +2

    Lilium is way ahead of anyone else. They are just as commited to assist in developing new a/c standards and routes with the FAA. they lead the pack in technology development.

  • @rahuldevgun8703
    @rahuldevgun8703 3 года назад +2

    Very good and informative .... I think Vertical has solid partnerships on the technology side + UK DoD + leasing companies & airlines ... Interesting would be to know the defense element / application of these plaforms

    • @rahuldevgun8703
      @rahuldevgun8703 3 года назад +1

      Further it’s also imp to run the sums related to total cost of ownership for a buyer say for 5 years, how much would servicing cost incl. the cost of overhauling the power plant and transmission. So when they say it would cost 40 usd for a ride I would be careful ... if possible do you have access to cost roll up calculation from the OEMs or which you have have worked out
      .. above said definitely this industry looks promising ... and does Elon musk / naval Ravikant have a view on this ? ?

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +1

      They did not provide that level of detail.
      Thanks for watching and commenting, Rahul!

  • @jeromeavila3195
    @jeromeavila3195 Год назад +1

    Nice presentation!

  • @yumoo4439
    @yumoo4439 Год назад

    I link LILIUM is the most beautiful evtol aircraft!!! A way beyond the others.

  • @Jeff-wb3hh
    @Jeff-wb3hh Год назад

    Joby has the clear all around advantage and it's far ahead of all of them. Also, latest tests show that Joby is far quieter than Lillium. Lullium sounds like a jet plane where Joby sound very quiet at a lower more plesant frequency. Joby plans to delever their first production aircraft early next year.

  • @wheijden1
    @wheijden1 Год назад

    Very helpful, thanks

  • @GG-Anaximander
    @GG-Anaximander Год назад

    Lillium is the only feasible technology to yield in a "large" scale transport. These things won't be able to replace city taxis. They just won't. Think about it for a second. They will rather extend the existing air transport to final destination or closer to the final destination for the most part. Especially realistic once solid state batteries scales up .Lillium's design is the only one that can do it safely in masses. Open propeller design compromises safety in large scale implementation. High winds, adverse weather, birds, anyone who can cast a hefty stone and happen to have bad intentions for any reason are some to start with.

  • @amberchannel4520
    @amberchannel4520 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so much for the information, very helpful!

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад

      You are so welcome! thank you for watching and commenting!

  • @irak9369
    @irak9369 3 года назад +1

    Thank you

  • @julieta203
    @julieta203 Год назад

    Well only one of these companies actually has a fully tested product with a low volume production line

  • @emoney822
    @emoney822 Год назад

    I'm thinking where there going to get all pilot's from it's a pilot shortage right now

  • @evandrodaolio
    @evandrodaolio Год назад

    I have shares of all❤

  • @Atyrabcde
    @Atyrabcde 3 года назад +1

    why do you think JOBY will have zero revenue in 2027 according to Vertical Aerospace's homepages(15:31)? thank you for the video btw

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +1

      According to Vertical Aerospace's slide deck, Joby would have positive revenue in 2027 however, they will have negative cash flow. This is because Joby business model is B2C (business to customer). Meaning, Joby plans to operate its own passenger network rather than selling its jets to other carriers (B2B or business to business model). The benefit of B2C is higher return on investment, but delayed payback. Hence the negative cash flow in the initial years of operation. Benefits of B2B (is the primary business model of Vertical Aviation, Lilium and Archer) is immediate payback, but likely at a lower return on investment. I will discuss these concepts in my next video. Subscribe to not miss it.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @raymondmay2136
    @raymondmay2136 2 года назад +1

    I am going with the smartest investor "Ballie"

  • @staceyvieira6946
    @staceyvieira6946 3 года назад +1

    i think blade urban air mobility, which will be the transportation platform of evtol transportation like the uber/lyft of urban air mobility, might benefit more then the makers of the actual evtol's

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +1

      I believe you may be right. With one exception - Joby. Joby plans to manufacture and operate its own passenger network (B2C). Essentially competing with Blade. Other eVTOL like Lilium, Archer and Vertical have a B2B as their primary business model.

  • @Birdylockso
    @Birdylockso 3 года назад +1

    Instead of picking one or two, what about buying the ETF that will track them? Anything like that yet? Anyone know?

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +1

      No such etf exists, as far as I know, at least not yet.

    • @TeslaBulldotcom
      @TeslaBulldotcom 2 года назад

      Fairly sure cathy wood now has an etf to track this sector

    • @Birdylockso
      @Birdylockso 2 года назад

      @@TeslaBulldotcom , thanks, Cathy.

    • @FGain
      @FGain  2 года назад +1

      No she does not. She has the space etf ARKX in which JOBY and ACHR are the smallest holdings. It can hardly be called eVTOL ETF (and space ETF for that matter).

    • @Birdylockso
      @Birdylockso 2 года назад +1

      @@FGain , thanks, this sounds much more reasonable, as the whole sector is still 2-3 years before even attempt to be profitable. I might start a small position in the next few days with JOBY and ACHR, as well as LILM, now that they have all stabilized in a new low range. Then, depending on additional news, they would all dip further or start to trend up...

  • @blueosaka2553
    @blueosaka2553 3 года назад +8

    Joby and ehang.

    • @hisokamorow8388
      @hisokamorow8388 3 года назад +5

      Ehang to the moon! 📈🙌🏼🌙💦

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +1

      EHang is very popular in this comment section.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @mattster303
    @mattster303 3 года назад +2

    Vertical x4 aircraft looks the best!

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад

      It does carry a certain gravitas that I like.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @0Turbox
    @0Turbox 3 года назад +1

    4 props only for the hoover mode? What a waste.

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад +1

      There are certain benefits (simplicity and ease of manufacturing) associated with such design. Although I agree, tiltable propellers are the way to go.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @bradkubota6968
    @bradkubota6968 2 года назад

    Honda Jet sells for 5ish million. How exactly is this vehicle with so much new technology, likely more or at least as much carbon fibre, plus expensive batteries going to be built for around 1/4 the retail of a Honda jet? I don't see it happening. Battery VTOL is likely going to cost AT BEST 1/2 per mile of Heli. No mention of charge time between flights which must run the REAL per hour cost up considerably. These are not planet savers so much as expensive toy options for the rich or VERY rich even.

  • @hasanchoudhury5401
    @hasanchoudhury5401 2 года назад

    JOBY EH UAVS TAKOF. Long.

  • @leoh2502
    @leoh2502 3 года назад +5

    EHang

    • @FGain
      @FGain  3 года назад

      Ehang gang is very active in this comment section. I like it.
      Thanks for watching!